DOCSLIB.ORG

Pulsar Timing Arrays for Nanohertz Gravitational Wave Astronomy Jim Cor Des Cornell University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pulsar Timing Arrays for Nanohertz Gravitational Wave Astronomy Jim Cor Des Cornell University Pulsar Timing Arrays for Nanohertz Gravitational Wave Astronomy Jim Cor des Cornell University • The physics of gravitational wave detection using pulsars • The astrostatistics of PTAs 8/24/2016• Forecasts andSAMSI Pulsar future TIming GW Arrays requirements 1 The Spectrum of Gravitational Wave Astronomy h • Cosmic strings dimensionless strain strain dimensionless 20 orders of magnitude in GW frequency corresponds to the 20 orders of magnitude between radio waves and high-energy gamma rays Using Pulsars as Clocks: Differential rotation, Precision Timing of Pulsars superfluid vortices Uncertainties in Interstellar dispersion planetary ephemerides and scattering and propagation in Glitches interplanetary Spin noise medium Magnetosphere Emission region: GPS time transfer beaming Additive noise and motion Instrumental polarization 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 3 The GW Spectrum Schematic PTA sensitivities Schematic GW stochastic background 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 4 Phases of Supermassive BH binary Mergers Dusty Madison 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 5 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 6 Basic Picture • Pulsar pulses = radio-wavelength photons. • The travel time to reach us is affected by the spacetime metric along the photon path. • Gravitational waves are ripples in spacetime that alter the distance that a photon travels. • With sufficient precision, we measure the presence of GWs by monitoring pulsars over long intervals T = 10 years and longer • Detector size = cT ~ 10+ light years (not the pulsar distance) 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 7 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 8 Basic GW Effect on Pulsar Timing Pulse width: W ≥ 40 μs Want TOA error: σt ≤ 100 ns factor of: > 400 Consider timing over T = 10 yr and a GW with strain h GW induces a frequency shift Δν/ν ~ h h+ ν = pulse frequency = 1/P Phase shift Δφ = ΔνT TOA shift Δt = PΔφ = hT For Δt = 100 ns and T = 10 yr: h× 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 9 1011 cycles 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 10 See Armstrong, Living Reviews in Relativity (Cassini spacecraft, etc.) 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 11 Sazhin 1978 large h(t)! • 1979: the fastest known pulsar was the Crab pulsar – P = 33 ms … a lousy clock! • We measure the spin rate of the crust • The internal superfluid spins slightly faster • `spin noise’ is from crust-superfluid interactions • 1982: Millisecond pulsars discovered • B1937+21 = 1.56 ms pulsar; much more spin stable (but still not good enough) • Now: about 200 MSPs known with different spin qualities; some are excellent clocks 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 12 Difficulties of GW Detection ΔL/L~ h Pulsar Timing Array Ground-based Interferometer L ~ cT ~ 3 pc L ~ 3 km -16 -14 -23 hmin ~ 10 – 10 hmin ~ 10 ΔL ~ 103 to 105 cm ΔL ~ 10-16 cm -3 -3 10 RNS 10 Rnucleus PTA: δt includes: •Translational motion of the NS ~ 100 to 1000 km/s •Orbital motions of the pulsar and observatory: 10s – 100s km/s •Interstellar propagation delays: ns to seconds 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 13 Definition of Pulsar Timing Array • Pulsars are rotating neutron stars emitting EM pulses by virtue of a rotating beam of radiation (radio to γ rays) • Millisecond pulsars (1.4 to 10 ms spin periods) are the best pulsar clocks (spin stability, narrow pulses) • Pulsar timing array = an array of MSPs monitored with precision time-tagging of pulses to detect GW perturbations • Multiple MSPs to measure correlated GW perturbation (quadrupolar) •8/24/2016Current pulsar timingSAMSI Pulsar is TIming done GW Arrays with large single14- Worst timing: ) 1 • Long periods - • Large fields • Fast spindown Issues: NS-NS binaries: • Differential rotation between crust and superfluid • Torque log Period(s derivative s variations Best timing: • Accretion •Short periods events? •Small fields • Injected •Slow spindown Period (sec) asteroids? 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 15 A galactic-scale GW detector: the Pulsar Timing Array GW perturbations are correlated among different pulsars. Need to observe an ensemble of MSPs to extract the correlated signal from the noise. 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays Pulsar angular separation (degrees) 16 Obser vat or y NANOGrav A collaboration of 70 scientists in the U.S. and The Green Bank TelescopeCanada and Arecibo Observatory Arecibo Observatory (AO), PR Green Bank Telescope (GBT), WV World’s largest World’s largest steerable radio telescope radio telescope 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 17 The International Pulsar Timing Array (IPTA) A Consortium of Consortia: NANOGrav + Parkes PTA (Australia) + European PTA 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 18 The PTA Challenge 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 19 PTA Challenges • Time-tag a pulse with w ≥ 40 μs to a precision δt < 100 ns Spk • Simplest case: localization with matched w filtering Matched filtering • Need large telescopes, wide bandwidths, long integrations Signal term = replica of template n(t) = white, Gaussian noise • Repeat for 10 years with cadence Δ < (idealized PTA) 1 month 8/24/2016 • Done?SAMSI No! Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 20 Departures from matched filtering Spinning NS = the clock Single pulses show phase jitter ~ 10 km radius relative to a fiducial spin phase Net effect: N pulses averaged ~uncorrelated jitter Mitigation: N >> 1 < 0.4 ns Crab pulsar Relativistic emission regions shot pulses (ns) • magnetosphere ~ 100 – 105 km • RLC ~ 50,000 km Pspin (sec) Hankins & Eilek 2007 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 21 Synchronous Averaging M×P P … • Stack M pulses (M= multiples of 105) • Time-tag using template fitting W • Repeat for L epochs spanning N=T/P spin periods (T=years) • N ~ 108 – 1010 cycles in one year • ⇒ P determined to • B1937+21: P = 0.0015578064924327±0.0000000000000004 s • J1909-3744: eccentricity < 0.00000013 (Jacoby et al.) 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 23 ~ [S/N]-1 See also Caballero et al. 2016 ISS Variations Above S/N > 100 for 2 min averages, RMS residual becomes independent of S/N Pulse jitter 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 24 Dispersion Delays Multipath broadening Diffractive (scattering) Scintillation Deterministic, removable Stochastic, not 100% modulations of with coherent dedispersion easily removable flux density Epoch dependent 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 25 Dispersed Pulse Coherently dedispersed pulse ∆t = 8.3 µs DM ν-3 ∆ν 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 26 Coherent Dedispersion pioneered by Tim Hankins (1971) Dispersion delays in the time domain represent a phase perturbation of the electric field in the Fourier domain: Coherent dedispersion involves multiplication of Fourier amplitudes by the inverse function, For the non-uniform ISM, we have where DM is known to high precision for known pulsars. The algorithm consists of • Application requires Nyquist sampling of large bandwidths (high data rate) • Scattering distortion is not removed • Coherent dedispersion yields the best timing precision and is 8/24/2016used routinely in NANOGravSAMSI Pulsar observationsTIming GW Arrays at Arecibo and with27 Coherent Dedispersion pioneered by Tim Hankins (1971) Dispersion delays in the time domain represent a phase perturbation of the electric field in the Fourier domain: Coherent dedispersion involves multiplication of Fourier amplitudes by the inverse function, For the non-uniform ISM, we have where DM is known to high precision for known pulsars. The algorithm consists of • Application requires Nyquist sampling of large bandwidths (high data rate) • Scattering distortion is not removed • Coherent dedispersion yields the best timing precision and is 8/24/2016used routinely in NANOGravSAMSI Pulsar observationsTIming GW Arrays at Arecibo and with28 Depar tures from Matched Plasma turbulence in theFiltering interstellar medium causes multipath propagation distortion of pulses Coherent waves from compact sources illuminate turbulent plasma in the ISM Scattering angle ~ λ2 Solid angle ~ λ4 Main effects: • Dispersive time delays • Multipath delays • Pulse distortion 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 29 Stochasticity of the PBF Nspeckles = Nscintles Speckles Nscintles = number of bright patches in the t-ν plane Nscintles ≈ (1+η B/Δνd)(1+ηT/Δtd) Timing error: θy Mitigation: use pulsars with low amount of scattering and θx high frequencies 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 30 Topocentric arrival times solar system barycenter (SSBC) Pulse phase To model is pulsar evaluated at the SSBC Differences in JPL Eart ephemerides: h DE 418, 421, 430 @ Saturn’s orbital period Roemer delay Solar system barycenter is near the 500 s sun’s photosphere 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 31 Simulated results for a millisecond pulsar Deterministic terms in the clock phase φ(t) Spin noise due to torque fluctuations (e.g. crust-core interactions) 8/24/2016 SAMSI Pulsar TIming GW Arrays 32 Timing M odel TOA = Deterministic terms + Stochastic terms + Systematic Errors > 18 terms White noise • Solar system • Spindown polynomial Red noise: ephemeris (location of • Astrometric Spin/torque noise SS barycenter) • Pulsar orbit ISM noise • Polarization calibration (post-Keplerian) • Time transfer (GPS) • Variation of pulse • Observatory clock shape with RF stability GW signal increases with data-span length •+ StochasticGravitational background waves(SBG + bursts with memory) • Continuous waves 2 • Bursts (memory) But so does red spin noise (rms ~ T ) GWs correlate between pulsars, red noise not Residuals = data - model 8/24/2016
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:2009.10649V3 [Astro-Ph.CO] 30 Jul 2021
    CERN-TH-2020-157 DESY 20-154 From NANOGrav to LIGO with metastable cosmic strings Wilfried Buchmuller,1, ∗ Valerie Domcke,2, 3, † and Kai Schmitz2, ‡ 1Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron DESY, 22607 Hamburg, Germany 2Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland 3Institute of Physics, Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, EPFL, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland (Dated: August 2, 2021) We interpret the recent NANOGrav results in terms of a stochastic gravitational wave background from metastable cosmic strings. The observed amplitude of a stochastic signal can be translated into a range for the cosmic string tension and the mass of magnetic monopoles arising in theories of grand unification. In a sizable part of the parameter space, this interpretation predicts a large stochastic gravitational wave signal in the frequency band of ground-based interferometers, which can be probed in the very near future. We confront these results with predictions from successful inflation, leptogenesis and dark matter from the spontaneous breaking of a gauged B−L symmetry. Introduction nal is too small to be observed by Virgo [17], LIGO [18] The direct observation of gravitational waves (GWs) and KAGRA [19] but will be probed by LISA [20] and generated by merging black holes [1{3] has led to an in- other planned GW observatories. creasing interest in further explorations of the GW spec- In this Letter we study a further possibility, metastable trum. Astrophysical sources can lead to a stochastic cosmic strings. Recently, it has been shown that GWs gravitational background (SGWB) over a wide range of emitted from a metastable cosmic string network can frequencies, and the ultimate hope is the detection of a probe the seesaw mechanism of neutrino physics and SGWB of cosmological origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitational Waves with the SKA
    Spanish SKA White Book, 2015 Font, Sintes & Sopuerta 29 Gravitational waves with the SKA Jos´eA. Font1;2, Alicia M. Sintes3, and Carlos F. Sopuerta4 1 Departamento de Astronom´ıay Astrof´ısica,Universitat de Val`encia,Dr. Moliner 50, 46100, Burjassot (Val`encia) 2 Observatori Astron`omic,Universitat de Val`encia,Catedr´aticoJos´eBeltr´an2, 46980, Paterna (Val`encia) 3 Departament de F´ısica,Universitat de les Illes Balears and Institut d'Estudis Espacials de Catalunya, Cra. Valldemossa km. 7.5, 07122 Palma de Mallorca 4 Institut de Ci`enciesde l'Espai (CSIC-IEEC), Campus UAB, Carrer de Can Magrans, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vall´es(Barcelona) Abstract Through its sensitivity, sky and frequency coverage, the SKA will be able to detect grav- itational waves { ripples in the fabric of spacetime { in the very low frequency band (10−9 − 10−7 Hz). The SKA will find and monitor multiple millisecond pulsars to iden- tify and characterize sources of gravitational radiation. About 50 years after the discovery of pulsars marked the beginning of a new era in fundamental physics, pulsars observed with the SKA have the potential to transform our understanding of gravitational physics and provide important clues about the early history of the Universe. In particular, the gravi- tational waves detected by the SKA will allow us to learn about galaxy formation and the origin and growth history of the most massive black holes in the Universe. At the same time, by analyzing the properties of the gravitational waves detected by the SKA we should be able to challenge the theory of General Relativity and constraint alternative theories of gravity, as well as to probe energies beyond the realm of the standard model of particle physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2009.06555V3 [Astro-Ph.CO] 1 Feb 2021
    KCL-PH-TH/2020-53, CERN-TH-2020-150 Cosmic String Interpretation of NANOGrav Pulsar Timing Data John Ellis,1, 2, 3, ∗ and Marek Lewicki1, 4, y 1Kings College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom 2Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 3National Institute of Chemical Physics & Biophysics, R¨avala10, 10143 Tallinn, Estonia 4Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw ul. Pasteura 5, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland Pulsar timing data used to provide upper limits on a possible stochastic gravitational wave back- ground (SGWB). However, the NANOGrav Collaboration has recently reported strong evidence for a stochastic common-spectrum process, which we interpret as a SGWB in the framework of cosmic strings. The possible NANOGrav signal would correspond to a string tension Gµ 2 (4×10−11; 10−10) at the 68% confidence level, with a different frequency dependence from supermassive black hole mergers. The SGWB produced by cosmic strings with such values of Gµ would be beyond the reach of LIGO, but could be measured by other planned and proposed detectors such as SKA, LISA, TianQin, AION-1km, AEDGE, Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer. Introduction: Stimulated by the direct discovery of for cosmic string models, discussing how experiments gravitational waves (GWs) by the LIGO and Virgo Col- could confirm or disprove such an interpretation. Upper laborations [1{8] of black holes and neutron stars at fre- limits on the SGWB are often quoted assuming a spec- 2=3 quencies f & 10 Hz, there is widespread interest in ex- trum described by a GW abundance proportional to f , periments exploring other parts of the GW spectrum.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitational Wave Astronomy and Cosmology
    Gravitational wave astronomy and cosmology The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Hughes, Scott A. “Gravitational Wave Astronomy and Cosmology.” Physics of the Dark Universe 4 (September 2014): 86–91. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2014.10.003 Publisher Elsevier Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/98059 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Physics of the Dark Universe 4 (2014) 86–91 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics of the Dark Universe journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dark Gravitational wave astronomy and cosmology Scott A. Hughes Department of Physics and MIT Kavli Institute, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States article info a b s t r a c t Keywords: The first direct observation of gravitational waves' action upon matter has recently been reported by Gravitational waves the BICEP2 experiment. Advanced ground-based gravitational-wave detectors are being installed. They Cosmology will soon be commissioned, and then begin searches for high-frequency gravitational waves at a sen- Gravitation sitivity level that is widely expected to reach events involving compact objects like stellar mass black holes and neutron stars. Pulsar timing arrays continue to improve the bounds on gravitational waves at nanohertz frequencies, and may detect a signal on roughly the same timescale as ground-based detectors. The science case for space-based interferometers targeting millihertz sources is very strong.
    [Show full text]
  • Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds
    Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds Nelson Christensen1;2 z 1ARTEMIS, Universit´eC^oted'Azur, Observatoire C^oted'Azur, CNRS, 06304 Nice, France 2Physics and Astronomy, Carleton College, Northfield, MN 55057, USA Abstract. A stochastic background of gravitational waves can be created by the superposition of a large number of independent sources. The physical processes occurring at the earliest moments of the universe certainly created a stochastic background that exists, at some level, today. This is analogous to the cosmic microwave background, which is an electromagnetic record of the early universe. The recent observations of gravitational waves by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors imply that there is also a stochastic background that has been created by binary black hole and binary neutron star mergers over the history of the universe. Whether the stochastic background is observed directly, or upper limits placed on it in specific frequency bands, important astrophysical and cosmological statements about it can be made. This review will summarize the current state of research of the stochastic background, from the sources of these gravitational waves, to the current methods used to observe them. Keywords: stochastic gravitational wave background, cosmology, gravitational waves 1. Introduction Gravitational waves are a prediction of Albert Einstein from 1916 [1,2], a consequence of general relativity [3]. Just as an accelerated electric charge will create electromagnetic waves (light), accelerating mass will create gravitational waves. And almost exactly arXiv:1811.08797v1 [gr-qc] 21 Nov 2018 a century after their prediction, gravitational waves were directly observed [4] for the first time by Advanced LIGO [5, 6].
    [Show full text]
  • PULSAR TIME and PULSAR TIMING at KALYAZIN , RUSSIA
    PULSAR TIME AND PULSAR TIMING at KALYAZIN , RUSSIA Yu.P. Ilyasov Pushchino Radio Astronomical Observatory (PRAO) of the Lebedev Physical Institute, Russia e-mail: [email protected] BIPM, 2006 MAIN LEADING PARTICIPANTS Belov Yu. I. Doroshenko O. V. Fedorov Yu.Yu.A. A. Ilyasov Yu. P. Kopeikin S. M. Oreshko V. V. Poperechenko B.A. Potapov V. A. Pshirkov M.S. Rodin A.E. Serov A.V. Zmeeva E.V. BIPM, 2006 • Precise timing of millisecond binary pulsars was started at Kalyazin radio astronomical observatory since 1996. (Tver’ region, Russia -37.650 EL; 57.330 NL). • Binary pulsars: J0613-0200, J1020+1001, J1640+2224, J1643- 1224, J1713+0747, J2145-0750, as well as isolated pulsar B1937+21, are among the Kalyazin Pulsar Timing Array (KPTA). • The pulsar B1937+21 is being monitored at Kalyazin observatory (Lebedev Phys. Inst., Russia-0.6 GHz) and Kashima space research centre (NICT, Japan-2.2 GHz) together since 1996. Main aim is: • a) to study Pulsar Time and to establish long life space ensemble of clocks, which could be complementary to atomic standards; • b) to detect gravitational waves extremely low frequency, which are generated Gravity Wave Background – GWB BIPM, 2006 Radio Telescope RT-64 (Kalyazin, Russia) Main reflector diameter 64 m Secondary reflector diameter 6 m RMS (surface) 0.7 mm Feed – Horn (wideband) 5.2 x 2.1 m Frequency range 0.5 – 15 GHz Antenna noise temperature 20K Total Efficiency (through range) 0.6 Slewing rate 1.5 deg/sec Receivers for frequency: 0.6; 1.4; 1.8; 2.2; 4.9; 8.3 GHz BIPM, 2006 Pulsar Signal of pulsar J2145-0750 on the monitor Radio telescope RT-64 Kalyazin pulsar timing complex Mean Pulse Profiles of Kalyazin Pulsar Timing Array (KPTA) pulsars at 600 MHz by 64-m dish and filter-bank receiver J0613-0200 J1012+5307 J1022+1001 J1640+2224 Р=3,1 ms, Pb=1,2 d, DM=38,7911 Р=5,2 ms, Pb=14,5 hrs, DM=9,0205 Р=16,5 ms, Pb=7,8 d, DM=10,2722 Р=3,2 ms, Pb=175 d, DM=18,415 S=10,5 mJy, Δt = 20 μs, Тobs.
    [Show full text]
  • European Pulsar Timing Array
    European Pulsar Timing Array Stappers, Janssen, Hessels et European Pulsar Timing Array AIM: To combine past, present and future pulsar timing data from 5 large European telescopes to enable improved timing of millisecond pulsars in general, and in specific to use these millisecond pulsars as part of a pulsar timing array to detect gravitational waves. Gravitational Wave Spectrum α hc(f) = A f 2 2 2 2 Ωgw(f) = (2 π /3 H0 ) f hc(f) LISA PTA LIGO Detecting Gravitational Waves With Pulsars • Observed pulse periods affected by presence of gravitational waves in Galaxy • For stochastic GW background, effects at pulsar and Earth are uncorrelated • With observations of one or two pulsars, can only put limit on strength of stochastic GW background, insufficient constraints! • Best limits are obtained for GW frequencies ~ 1/T where T is length of data span • Analysis of 8-year sequence of Arecibo observations of PSR B1855+09 gives -7 Ωg = ρGW/ρc < 10 (Kaspi et al. 1994, McHugh et al.1996) • Extended 17-year data set gives better limit, but non-uniformity makes quantitative analysis difficult (Lommen 2001, Damour & Vilenkin 2004) A Pulsar Timing Array • With observations of many pulsars widely distributed on the sky can in principle detect a stochastic gravitational wave background resulting from binary BH systems in galaxies, relic radiation, etc • Gravitational waves passing over the pulsars are uncorrelated • Gravitational waves passing over Earth produce a correlated signal in the TOA residuals for all pulsars • Requires observations of ~20 MSPs over 5 – 10 years; with at least some down to 100 ns could give the first direct detection of gravitational waves! • A timing array can detect instabilities in terrestrial time standards – establish a pulsar timescale • Can improve knowledge of Solar system properties, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Astro2020 Science White Paper Fundamental Physics with Radio Millisecond Pulsars
    Astro2020 Science White Paper Fundamental Physics with Radio Millisecond Pulsars Thematic Areas: 3Formation and Evolution of Compact Objects 3Cosmology and Fundamental Physics Principal Author: Emmanuel Fonseca (McGill Univ.), [email protected] Co-authors: P. Demorest (NRAO), S. Ransom (NRAO), I. Stairs (UBC), and NANOGrav This is one of five core white papers from the NANOGrav Collaboration; the others are: • Gravitational Waves, Extreme Astrophysics, and Fundamental Physics With Pulsar Timing Arrays, J. Cordes, M. McLaughlin, et al. • Supermassive Black-hole Demographics & Environments With Pulsar Timing Arrays, S. R. Taylor, S. Burke-Spolaor, et al. • Multi-messenger Astrophysics with Pulsar Timing Arrays, L.Z. Kelley, M. Charisi, et al. • Physics Beyond the Standard Model with Pulsar Timing Arrays, X. Siemens, J. Hazboun, et al. Abstract: We summarize the state of the art and future directions in using millisecond ra- dio pulsars to test gravitation and measure intrinsic, fundamental parameters of the pulsar sys- tems. As discussed below, such measurements continue to yield high-impact constraints on vi- able nuclear processes that govern the theoretically-elusive interior of neutron stars, and place the most stringent limits on the validity of general relativity in extreme environments. Ongoing and planned pulsar-timing measurements provide the greatest opportunities for measurements of compact-object masses and new general-relativistic variations in orbits. arXiv:1903.08194v1 [astro-ph.HE] 19 Mar 2019 A radio pulsar in relativistic orbit with a white dwarf. (Credit: ESO / L. Calc¸ada) 1 1 Key Motivations & Opportunities One of the outstanding mysteries in astrophysics is the nature of gravitation and matter within extreme-density environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Masha Baryakhtar
    GRAVITATIONAL WAVES: FROM DETECTION TO NEW PHYSICS SEARCHES Masha Baryakhtar New York University Lecture 1 June 29. 2020 Today • Noise at LIGO (finishing yesterday’s lecture) • Pulsar Timing for Gravitational Waves and Dark Matter • Introduction to Black hole superradiance 2 Gravitational Wave Signals Gravitational wave strain ∆L ⇠ L Advanced LIGO Advanced LIGO and VIRGO already made several discoveries Goal to reach target sensitivity in the next years Advanced VIRGO 3 Gravitational Wave Noise Advanced LIGO sensitivity LIGO-T1800044-v5 4 Noise in Interferometers • What are the limiting noise sources? • Seismic noise, requires passive and active isolation • Quantum nature of light: shot noise and radiation pressure 5 Signal in Interferometers •A gravitational wave arriving at the interferometer will change the relative time travel in the two arms, changing the interference pattern Measuring path-length Signal in Interferometers • A interferometer detector translates GW into light power (transducer) •A gravitational wave arriving at the• interferometerIf we would detect changeswill change of 1 wavelength the (10-6) we would be limited to relative time travel in the two arms, 10changing-11, considering the interference the total effective pattern arm-length (100 km) • •Converts gravitational waves to changeOur ability in light to detect power GW at is thetherefore detector our ability to detect changes in light power • Power for a interferometer will be given by •The power at the output is • The key to reach a sensitivity of 10-21 sensitivity
    [Show full text]
  • Rutger Van Haasteren (Jet Propulsion Lab) Detecting Gravitational-Waves
    Detecting gravitational-waves by observing pulsars, nature's most accurate natural clocks. Rutger van Haasteren (Jet Propulsion Lab) Credit: David Champion Outline 1. Gravitational-wave detector principles 2. Pulsars and pulsar timing 3. Examples of pulsar timing 4. Gravitational-waves sources 5. Pulsar timing arrays 6. Outlook and detection prospects What is a GW? Gravitational wave: ripple in Gravity wave: refer to one of in the curvature of spacetime Tokyo's local surfers that propagates outward from the source as a wave. Effect and detectability of GWs Effect of GWs is an oscillating Speed of light is constant. Riemann curvature tensor, possible in two polarisations. Measure time, not distance. → Measure propagation length! Effect and detectability of GWs a b Credit: Advanced Technology Center, NAOJ Emit light, and reflect back LASER has precise frequency → equivalent to clock Now it is truly a 'timing experiment' Interferometry for detection Need precise frequency/clock Could say that KAGRA uses What about pulsar's spin a LASER as an accurate frequency? frequency standard Period of PSR B1937+21: T = 0.00155780644887275 s Strain sensitivity per frequency Energy density function of wavelength Electromagnetic waves: Ω∝∣E∣2+∣B∣2 Gravitational waves: Ω∝∣h˙∣2=f 2h(f )2 Atomic nucleus is ~1e-15m With 3km arm, reach sensitivity down to distance variations of ~1e-21m?? (zepto-meter) Yardley et al. (2010) Pulsars Discovery: LGM1 Pulsar discovery in 1967: LGM1 (= PSR B1919+21) 'Knocking sound' Discovery: LGM1 Pulsar discovery in 1967: LGM1 (= PSR B1919+21) 'Knocking sound' Explanation: neutron star Baade & Zwicky in 1934: "With all reserve we advance the view that a supernova represents the transition of an ordinary star into a new form of star, the neutron star, which would be the end point of stellar evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Hobbs G., Coles W., Manchester R., Chen D.: Developing a Pulsar
    DEVELOPING A PULSAR-BASED TIMESCALE G. HOBBS1, W. COLES2, R. MANCHESTER3, D. CHEN4 1 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science PO Box 76, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia [email protected] 2 Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California La Jolla, California, U.S.A. [email protected] 3 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science PO Box 76, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia [email protected] 4 National Time Service Center CAS, Xian, China [email protected] ABSTRACT. We show how pulsar observations may be used to construct a time standard that is independent of terrestrial time standards. The pulsar time scale provides a method to determine the stability of terrestrial time standards over years to decades. Here, we summarise the method, provide initial results and discuss the possibilities and limitations of our pulsar time scale. 1. INTRODUCTION Almost 2000 rapidly rotating neutron stars, known as pulsars, have now been discovered (Manchester et al. 2005)1. Pulses of radiation from these pulsars are detected using large radio telescopes. The pulses are thought to be caused by a beam of radiation that sweeps across the Earth as the star rotates. As pulsars are very stable rotators, the pulse arrival times (ToAs) can be predicted very accurately over many years. Recent work (Hobbs, Lyne & Kramer 2010a) has shown that, for some pulsars, every rotation of the neutron star over the previous ∼ 40yr can be accounted for. That work also confirmed the existence of unexplained irregularities in the rotation rate of many pulsars. Such irregularities are generally divided into “glitch events” (e.g., Wang et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulsar Timing Array Constraints on the Induced Gravitational Waves
    Prepared for submission to JCAP Pulsar Timing Array Constraints on the Induced Gravitational Waves Rong-Gen Cai,a;d Shi Pi,b Shao-Jiang Wang,c Xing-Yu Yang a;d;1 aCAS Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 2735, Beijing 100190, China bKavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277{8583, Japan cTufts Institute of Cosmology, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, 574 Boston Avenue, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA dSchool of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.19A Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. If the black holes detected by LIGO/VIRGO are primordial black holes (PBHs) sourcing from a large primordial curvature perturbation on small scales, the corresponding induced gravitational waves (GWs) would peak at nanohertz that is detectable by the current and future observations of pulsar timing array (PTA). In this paper we show that with the mass function estimated from the merger rate of LIGO O1 and O2 events, the induced GWs from such a curvature perturbation with a Gaussian narrow peak at some small scale would be in a seemingly mild tension with current constraints from PTA. However, if the curvature perturbation is of local-type non-Gaussianity with a non-linear parameter fNL & O(10), the tension could be relieved.
    [Show full text]