State of the Art
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Organic in Europe PROSPECTS and DEVELOPMENTS Editor and Publisher
ORGANIC IN EUROPE PROSPECTS AND DEVELOPMENTS EDITOR AND PUBLISHER: IFOAM EU Group, FiBL and CIHEAM-IAMB IFOAM EU Group Rue du Commerce 124, BE - 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone: +32 2280 1223 - Fax: +32 2735 7381 [email protected] www.ifoam-eu.org EDITORS: Stephen Meredith and Helga Willer PRODUCTION SUppORT: Laura Ullmann, Ann-Kathrin Trappenberg, Laura Maeso and Kathleen Delage COUNTRY REPORT AND STATISTICAL DATA COLLECTION, DRAFTING AND EDITING: FiBL Projekte GmbH LANGUAge EDITING: Alastair Penny SpeCIAL THANKS FOR THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS TO: Bram Moeskops, Emanuele Busacca, Antje Kölling, Gianluigi Cardone and Patrizia Pugliese, Marie Reine Bteich, Lina Al-Bitar, Virginia Belsanti, Jürn Sanders, Otto Schmid, Diana Schaack and all ORGANIC national experts who contributed to the country reports. DESIGN AND LAYOUT: fuel.bvba/sprl – www.fueldesign.be The opinions expressed by the authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of IFOAM EU. While all IN EUROPE efforts were taken to ensure the accuracy of the publication’s content and to collect statistics and reports from all countries, errors and omissions cannot be entirely ruled out. Corrections and additional content should be sent in writing to helga. [email protected]. Should revisions or additional content be necessary they will be published at: www.ifoam-eu.org. PROSPECTS AND PARTNERS: DEVELOPMENTS SUPPORTERS: Green Organics This publication was printed on FSC certified paper, by an FSC Chain of Custody certified printer, making use of vegetable inks. FOREWORD The organic movements are custodians of good food and good farming promoting the diversity of European food culture, safeguarding the long-term vitality of our countryside and contributing to development of a truly green economy underpinned by agro-ecological approaches. -
THE EUROPEAN UNION POST-2013 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY REFORM Contested Representations of Biodiversity
THE EUROPEAN UNION POST-2013 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY REFORM Contested representations of biodiversity A Research Paper presented by: ANNE-CECILE GALLET (France) in partial fulfillment of the requirements for obtaining the degree of MASTERS OF ARTS IN DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Specialization: Agriculture and Rural Development (ARD) Members of the Examining Committee: Bram Büscher Ingrid Nelson The Hague, The Netherlands December 2012 ii Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The European Union’s project of biodiversity conservation 2 1.2 Reactions and interactions with social movements 2 1.3 Research objectives and delimitations 3 Chapter 2 Politics and discursive constructions in policy process 7 2.1 The politics behind the environmental Common Agricultural Policy reform: an interactive approach between European institutions and society 7 2.1.1 Politics at the core of policy-making 7 2.1.2 The European Union conceptualized as a state 7 2.1.3 Towards an interactive approach of the Common Agricultural Policy reform 8 2.2 Power 8 2.3 The political interactions between the European Union and social movements 9 2.4 Placing the Common Agricultural Policy reform in its discursive contents 10 2.4.1 Discourse 11 2.4.2 Biodiversity discourse 11 Chapter 3 The Common Agricultural Policy reform: Interplay of actors and power 13 3.1 Historical context of the Common Agricultural Policy reform 13 3.1.1 The porosity between change and continuity 13 3.1.2 Policy narratives serving continuity 15 3.2 The post-2013 CAP reform: renewed dynamics between -
Elusive Publics
Elusive publics Citation for published version (APA): Mitzschke, A. (2018). Elusive publics: understanding techno-scientific controversy and democratic governance in the GM crops debate. Datawyse / Universitaire Pers Maastricht. https://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20181220am Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2018 DOI: 10.26481/dis.20181220am Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. -
European Food Politics and Social Movements
EUROPEAN FOOD POLITICS AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS ‘To what extent would CAP post-2020 integrate agroecological practices to smooth the transition towards a post-growth economy?’ by Ana-Maria Gatejel 15023702 11 June 2019 The Hague University of Applied Sciences Faculty of Management and Organizations European Studies P. Pijlman Word Count: 17474 Abstract The European Common Agricultural Policy is the only political project worldwide regulating and financially supporting food production transnationally, however there has been continued criticism regarding its impact on the environment and rural communities. This paper is concerned with evolution of the CAP in the context of the backlash against conventional agriculture and the emergence of more sustainable alternatives. As food production is only a fraction of the contemporary food regime, the question of a systemic change arises and is fed by a new school of thought, Degrowth. The development of an ecological type of agriculture rooted in the idea biophysical limits cannot compete with the fully-established production forms without challenging them. Furthermore, this paper is open to determine the likelihood of agroecology reaching the policy discussions in the context of a non-growth dependent strategy. Through the detailed examination of the current CAP debate and the wider implications for agroecology and degrowth, the research argues that despite climate emergency and rural socioeconomic realities, the European Commission lacks political will in properly addressing systemic failures. It does so in spite of strong public support in favour of radical reform. Moreover, this research further supports the benefits of agroecology for a transition towards a more sustainable society beyond the growth paradigm. -
URBACT Sustainable Food in Urban Comminities
Sustainable Food in Urban Communities Developing low-carbon and resource-efficient urban food systems Basel Baseline Study - 31 October 2012 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS STATE OF THE ART ___________________________________________ 3 I. Global context & main urban issues ____________________________________ 4 II. Food system stakeholders & policies __________________________________ 8 III. Spatial & human dynamics of Food for a resilient food system ____________ 14 PROFILES OF THE PARTICIPATING CITIES ______________________ 23 City profile for Amersfoort _____________________________________________ 23 City profile for Athens ________________________________________________ 30 City profile for Bristol _________________________________________________ 37 City profile for Brussels _______________________________________________ 45 City profile for Gothenburg ____________________________________________ 53 City profile for Lyon __________________________________________________ 59 City profile for Messina _______________________________________________ 64 City profile for Oslo __________________________________________________ 70 City profile for Ourense _______________________________________________ 78 City profile for Vaslui _________________________________________________ 83 SYNTHESIS _________________________________________________ 89 Synthesis of the state of the art ________________________________________ 89 Synthesis of the city profiles, converging points, expectations & contributions 90 Resulting themes and crosscutting issues _______________________________