differentiates

relating

understandings.

‘In

chance

Seattle’s what

that

and

countries,

shocked

number

overwhelmed

In

homophobic

necessity

serve

creates

has

for with

Project

equated

subject,

which becomes

death this

association

The

outburst

Amy

A

The

this

the

specifically

the

seemed

Response

received,

association,

fuelled

is

life.

It

to/understanding/being

the

essay,

and

to

used is

Saunders

a

Sexuality

regulation

of

Dan

early

Gets

including

naturalizes

by

straightening

with

lead

of

propaganda

oppressive

within Using

and

Saunders Abstract

showcase hegemonic

In

association

intertwined

from

activists,

suicides,

the

I

as

Through

that

to

use

‘To

queer’

the

violence

the

Savage,

this

a

by

these only

Judith

the Better

image

verb

be

the fall

death,

queer’

of

concepts

queerness

‘sudden’

a

normative

events;

as

a

changing

word

essay,

to

rather

nation

LGBT

of

the

by

wave

nature

youth

LGBT

a

critically

as stories

well

of

of

the

or

Halberstam’s

of

of

discourse

writer of

the

way Project,

and

lives, with

The

the

device whereas

well

‘queer’

‘queering white,

homosexuality

than

the

2010,

critical

media

the

Death:

from

Amy

as

for

the of

of

outburst

mode

youth.

the

heteronormative

ideology

suicides

to

and

death

communities

of

a

in

as

both

modern

It

of homosexual

homosexual the

“It

and

noun.

that

a

death

that

wake

Jasbir

privileged

investigates

of

queer

its

of

the

the

homosexuality

of’

a

happier

Saunders

attention

Gets

of

the

It

‘queering’

Gets

heteronormativity

the

thinking

In

37

and

queer

project

acceptance

nation

is

In

is

the

column

suicides

of

Gets

in

world

day

used

of

response

Puar’s

in

that

of United

youth

and

a

queer

the

Better”

the

nation

the

Better

FOOTNOTES

line

necropolitics.

life

to

and

and

Queer

this

Better

and

to

as

that subject,

and

normative

explores

the

youth

death

create Western

organized

homosexual

queerness

Savage

both discourse. Terrorist

understanding-

themselves.

with

suicide

thrive the

for

youth

of

normative.

death

to

outburst

state:

of

States

the

campaign

LGBT

specific

have

a

an

Time

Project

queer

the of

hornonormative

the

suicides,

Campaign

mode

the

It is

identity

through

suicides

Love,

the

ideas

world,

of

the

have

Assemblages

desperate

with

and

LGBT the

Gets

biopolitical

subject,

and

societal

in

of

allies

of

the

youth,

The

and

nation.

Volume

of

subject.

heteronormative

thinking

itself,

The

prospect

in

and

This

and

response

death.

America

become the

jumped

of

nation.

Better

Place,

struck

this

It

highlights

suicides

gay-bashing,

in

‘othemess’is

community,

questioning

actions

a

nation

the

Gets

the

producing

means

sense

is

regulation

normative

situation,

a

queerness

Opposing

that

Through

climate

4

equated

aims

Project

by

of

at

Better

and a

(2011)

to

for

was

was

had

tool

the

life,

the

the

to an FOOTNOTES the Project. The showcases Dan Savage and his partner, both white, gay, male subjects who associate with the homonormative discourse, reaching out to queer youth in order to explain that their lives could get better, if only they chose to live them.

Dan Savage and his partner exemplify the existence of homonormativity, defined as the heteronormative lifestyle lived out by subjects who identify as homosexual. This lifestyle includes marriage, proper work, consumption, adopting children, becoming an upstanding citizen that can uphold the standards set upon heteronormative subjects. The allowance of gay subjects into this heternormative discourse of life implies that the current climate in which we live is a climate of supposed sexual acceptance, of sexual exceptionalism the It Gets Better campaign, Dan Savage and his partner.In create propaganda for a homonationalist way of life, a homosexual2 way of life that follows the heteronormative discourse, which benefits the nation state. This is a time and space of queer temporality, as “homonationalism is [...j a temporal and spatial illusion, a facile construction that is easily revoked, dooming the exceptional ” This is to say that the temporal existence of a queer nationalism,3 of a homonormative and homonationalist discourse, is always. on the brink of its own demise. Within its own existence, sexual exceptionalism, which allows propaganda like that of It Gets Better to exist, is always a moment away from its own death. Queerness is always in tandem with death, whether through the queer body, the queer youth of the nation or the ideology of queerness itself.

Judith Halberstam’s In a Queer Time and Place focuses the first two chapters of the book on the death of Brandon Teena, a white female to male transgender subject living in small-town Nebraska in the United States who was brutally murdered once being ‘discovered’ to be living as a transgendered man. Halberstam argues that Teena was living “literally and figuratively out of time and place” and argument is that there4exists a time and place through which Halberstam claiming that is not ‘out’ but rather ‘in’ for queer subjects., The notion of US sexual exceptionalism paints the Western World, specifically the United States,5 as a place that welcomes queer subjects and queer bodies

2 Jasbir Puar, Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times (United States: Duke University Press, 2007), 67. Puar, Terrorist Assemblages, 78.

Judith Halberstam, In a Queer Time & Place (United States: New York University Press, 2005), 16. A concept borrowed from Puar, Terrorist Assemblages, which can be described as the notion of the States being a place that accepts all different types of people (including homosexuals) and the idea that because of this ‘acceptance’ the United States is on the forefront of modernity, progress and sexual libertaion.

38

6

their

climate

nation

example,

space

homosexual

death.

also

normative

Because

show

normativity,

applaud

association

accepted boundaries

in

Due

adopted

aside

partner

queer

positive

disease

Halberstam,

Halberstam, rents

are

By

accumulation:

familial

normative

Halberstam

the

through

narratives,

incapable

way

of

claims, identification

subjects

concurrent

the

friend

death

‘in’.

line

face

doing

subjects

age.

life

small-town

not to

little

boys,

in

from

The

of like Contradictorily,

time.

of

in

with

(sex

the

which

are

of

the

out

time

who

of

the death,

barebackers)

into

Clementi

the

the

sexuality

son (heterosexuals)

Queer in

Queer

Dan

modes

or

subjects

so,

of

who

time

the

the

sex

took

of colour

In

pursuit

fact

that

two

subjects

of

workers).

with

as

no

the

face

subject associated

offers

as

did

victims

situating

line the

fact,

they

of

time

he

normative

here

Savage’s

do

a

workers” 6 .

fact

Time the

Time

concern

well

“we

because

who

it

time

that

homonationalist

hetemormative

are

queerness

in

occurs

normative

of

lived

the of

upon

in that

himself

to

with not there

queer

that

& [he]

& of

fact

we

and

homophobia

the

living,

as

whose

beat

the

of

Place,

create

the

Place,

that

the

ideology

of associated

In

death,

long

to

itself

the

his

on

could themselves

take

homosexuality

they

for

cross

with

also

space,

Brandon

is

he

the

US

normative

life,

reasoning

only

subject

homophobic

Outside

lives

story

the

Teena,

allowed

and

the

It

4.

not

life,

was

10.

with

longevity” 7 .

life,

he

opted

discourse.

homosexuality

It

longevity

their

were in

happen

Gets

often

represent

the

death;

subject edges

consider

much Gets

the

of of

became

a

after

they subjects

the

of

only

39

and death.

association

and

his

narrative

heterosexual

and

of

lives

subjects

not

Teena

Better

Teena

“to

Dan

with

for

perpetuation

to

live[d]

Better

homonationalist/heteronormative

the of

that

association

girlfriend

pathologize about

are from

discourses

eighteen

to

queer

a

.

homonationalist

kill

the

who live

THE

Their

bullying,

in

does. logics

as Since

[...J

Savage,

automatically

the

be normative

who

long

is

Project

subjects death,

the

did

Teena

Teena

freedom

Project,

the

that

that

the

outside

outside

their

not

in

life

will

did

normative

HIV-positive

The

SEXUALITY

with

association

face

represent

Teena

of

not

a

years

life

life.

and

most of

diseased

can

clearly has

same-sex

lifestyles

not

and

labour

his

of

was

soon

of

queering only

Tyler

modes

with

operated

his

of

who

The

align

death:

construction

Dan

of

of

the

his

of

life,

been

was,

associate

of

partner,

thus

contribute

an

life:

desirable

life,

created

his

reproductive

associated

subjects,

be boys

differently-abled

the

happiness

logic

and

age,

are

ever-changing

Savage

do

furthering

Clementi, normative attitude

subject

of

himself

murdering

with

as

render

diminished

‘queering’

that

which

relationship.

but

barebackers,

of

ridden

perpetuation

they

OF

not

production.

temporally

living

Halberstam

outside

who

an

of

time

and

for

with

rather

is

death

DEATH

and

due

age

of

future,

live

to

capital

his

queer,

that

(HIV

were

were

is

live

with

with

their

with

time

and

that

and

the

for

life;

and

his

to

at life

life

an

the

the

the

in

is his

of

in

in is FOOTNOTES which one is not yet able to involve themselves thoroughly with the life of the nation through acts of marriage and reproduction. In this sense, Clementi and the other subjects of the It Gets Better Project queered time and space more so than Dan Savage and his partner currently do. The critical differences of these two lives is as follows: Dan Savage has aligned himself with the life of the nation through homonationalism and following the heteronormative discourse, perhaps in order to survive. Tyler Clementi aligned himself with death through his inability to follow a heteronormative discourse, not only by way of homonationalism but also by way of his queerness, which queered the space he was in to a point of uncomfortability, leading to his suicide. In short, Clementi is a queer subject, whereas Dan Savage is a homonationalist, albeit homonormative subject.

Halberstam introduces the idea of “geographies of resistance” in relation to the queer body. The queer body and the queer subject as a site of resistance becomes problematic for heteronormative discourses that homonormative subjects tend to follow in order to be associated with the life of the nation, rather than death. Queer bodies and queer subjects as tools for resistance become associated with “improper, norinational queerness” Puar states, “we have a split between proper, national (white)8 homosexuality [...] and improper (colored) nonnational queerness [...] therefore proliferating the sexualities of which Foucault. speaks (the good patriot, the bad terrorist, the suicide bomber, the married gay boy, the monster-terrorist-fag, the effeminate turbaned man...)”. This split is reflected in the It Gets Better Project; Dan Savage and his partner are the proper, white, nationalist homosexual subjects, whereas Tyler Clementi and the other queer youth who committed suicide are representative of improper nonnational queerness. This is due to the fact that Dan Savage and his partner have chosen to associate themselves with life, through living, as well as through the It Gets Better campaign, while Tyler Clementi has become associated with death through his suicide and through the campaign’s exploitation of his suicide. Dan Savage is representative of life, whereas Tyler Clementi is only representative of death because it is all he is known for.

Non-normativity is associated with people of colour; people of any race other than white. In this sense, the It Gets Better campaign is not only a straightening device for proper homosexuality, but also a whitening device, as queer youth of colour are completely absent from the campaign. Nor is the subject of race or class at all touched upon. Instead, what It Gets Better enlists is a reproduction of whiteness in life; to deviate from whiteness is to assume otherness, such as blackness, which is to associate with death; just as to deviate from heterosexuality is to assume homosexuality, which is to associate with

8 Puar, Terrorist Assemblages, 78.

40

power,

death

necropolitics

and

Culture

10

of public

spectrum,

exceptionalism utilizing

use

queerness necropolitics

This

practice

discursive

repressive,

heterosexuality

homosexuality

the

were

that

officers 9 .

In

own

therefore

propaganda

Puar, with

lower

the Homophobia

continually nation,

put

has

white,

the

differences

family

Savage’s “strolling the

improper

death.

Iraqi

the

concept

Terrorist

of

ideology

of

project

Dan

mainstream

occur

narrative

being

that

Terrorist

nature

right

practice

15,]

life

a

tortured

on

S/M

and

queer

homonormative,

rather taking

prisoners

sexual

of

taken Savage

to

allows

(2003):

through

the

is

a

Images

with for

Dan

relates

nonnational

narrative

heterosexual in the

normalizing

power

practices

utilized

decide different

fail

be

fail

Assemblages,

subject.

of

Assemblages,

necropolitics’°

that

of

racialized

through

Abu

queers

and

from

of

than

of a

by

barbarism,

streets

in

‘othered’

practices queerness

Savage’s

11-40.

to

dictates

deviance

and

to

through trip

in

him

who

his

any

pushes

light of

in

the

racism

creates

become

necropolitics

Achille

means

Ghraib,

discuss

of

a

death,

the

to

The

these

class.

gets position

on

of life.

highlights

torture.

and

improper,

racial

to

of

the

life

heterosexuality Paris, queerness

of

79.

body

the

colour,

tool.

concept Iraqi

middle

Mbembe’s

subjects.

associate

to

heteronorniative

seen

his

Paris

reflect

lifestyle

associated the

Dan

in

a

and

of

the are

animalistic

associated

anti-hegemonic

live events

Puar

the

Iraq.

The

tortured

differences

void

whiteness,

relation

homosexual

death

France

in

of

Heterosexuality

prisoners

of

things

white,

necropolitical

as

and

In

possible

is

and

Savage

nonnational

to

differently-abled

It

one

privilege.

the

for

discusses the

In

deviant

that

warfare

41

“Necropolitics,” between

who

in

Dan

circulated

of

these

upper

himself itself

Gets

Abu

chatting”.

prisoner. terms

there

queer

body

with another

that

in

regulation

to

project’s

normative

with

gets

characteristics

power,

Savage

THE

discusses

which

of

maleness

idealizes

class

standardizes

acceptance

Better

Ghraib,

is reflects

and

class

are

instances

subjects,

to

homosexuality

in

by

the

life,

The

actions

a

of

the

the

with

die.

position

discursive

queemesses,

has

practices

in

not

on

perverse

SEXUALITY

sexuality,

and

Abu using

The

Iraqi

he

This

becomes

and

subject

In trans.

two

with

events

lifestyle

their

inability

Project

the

the

discourse

of

wherein life

available

relation

Iraqi

details

spent

upon

‘regular’

and

queers,

race.

power

notion

the

by

prisoners’ Ghraib,

Libby

specific

ends

homosexuality

death. into

of

sexuality internet,

consistent

power

of

and

and

class,

who

of

the

by

other

white,

of

prisoners

time

to

the

Dan

this

race

that

to once

homosexuality.

sexual

a

about

the

Meintjes,

deviance.

sexual

to

of

that

by

the

the

this

sexual

of and

dictate

with

basis

to

discursive

sexuality

function

forward

has

OF

members

Dan

all

with

the part

US

where

ideology

discuss

paralleling and

Savage

association

essay,

American everybody.

upholding

American

again

life

will

sexuality

the

queers

parallels

his

ability

access

of

the

DEATH

torture,

torture

for

sexual

sexual

of

Public

torture

Savage class

ability

of

his

of

which

by

white

The

as

war

is

Dan

the

the and

by

is

son

the

of

the

its

of

of

to

a

to

of

in

a a FOOTNOTES

interplaying with S/M, versus the American, white heteronormative or homonormative subject’s sexuality. This creates the ideology that the racialized other must have a regularized and therefore acceptable sexual personality in order to escape death. Based on the regularization of sexuality in Dan Savage’s propaganda The It Gets Better Project, the prisoners of the Iraqi prison, as racialized subjects, deserved to be subjected to having the decision of the continuance of the their lives or their eminent deaths rest in the hands of the white American soldiers, at whose hands they suffered. These prisoners were used as a tool of regulation of the othered body, outside and inside sexualities.

The torture at Abu Ghraib regulates the racial other and the queer subject simultaneously, ousting both as relative to the death of one nation (Iraq) to perpetuate the life of another nation (America). As this war has meant the death of many Iraqi civilians and Iraqi and American solidiers. The placement of not just a sexual torture, but rather a homosexual torture reinstates the interplay of shame of homosexuality and its dependence upon the presence of death in order to exist. Just as in the case of Tyler Clementi’s suicide, the homosexual tortures in Abu Ghraib only exist in a space that has a dependence on the death of something - if even just the death of the possibility of acceptance of queerness (not just a queerness that follows heteronormative scripts and becomes homonormative) as a societal norm. The fact that heterosexuality was not used as a torture device on the bodies of Abu Ghraib prisoners shows that there is nothing deviant or shame-worthy in heterosexual sex practices. What the It Gets Better Project aims to do is justify and honour the deaths of a number of white, male, American homosexual subjects in order to produce a proper homosexuality that is in line with the aims of the nation state. This project fails to access an audience of any ‘true’ queerness, whose subjects deviate from the norm of homonormativity and whiteness. What Dan Savage’s campaign in fact does is highlight the existence of death within the life of the homosexual as well as the regulatory power of heteronormativity and its relationship with a ‘proper’ homosexuality. Through this process of ‘othering’, Dan Savages campaign does not only virtually murder the possibility of life for nonnormative sexual subjects, but also nonnormative subjects whose ‘queerness’ and ‘othemess’ rests in their race, class and/or ability- even the life of a heterosexual subject who queers societal norms, such as a queer subject or homosexual that does not fight for marriage rights or aim to mimick nuclear, heterosexual family ideals, is left out of the equation of this image of life, only to find themselves aligned with death. Through Dan Savage’s campaign there is a clear idolization of successful homosexuality as well as a red herring for failed homosexuality. Through this propaganda for the biopolitical functions of a ‘proper’ sexuality, there is an evident and oppressive presence of the death of the homosexual and queer subject, always present in a life that lives within a society that adheres to dominant heterosexual discursive power.

42

Puar,

Mbembe,

Halberstam,

Works

Jasbir,

United

Culture.

University

Cited

Achille,

Terrorist

Judith,

States:

15,1

“Necropolitics,”

In

Press,

Assemblages:

(2003):

a

Duke

Queer

2005.

University

11-40.

Time

43

trans.

Homonationalism

&

THE

Place.

Press,

Libby

SEXUALITY

United

2007.

Meintjes,

States:

in

Queer

Public

OF

New

DEATH

Times. York