DOCSLIB.ORG

Full Programme Monday 12 July Welcome

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Full Programme Monday 12 July Welcome Full Programme Monday 12 July Welcome Speech and Presentation: 13.00 – 13.45 Gilbert Murray Hall, Main Hall Professor Mike Hough (President, British Society of Criminology) Adrian Beck (Head of Department, Department of Criminology, University of Leicester) Presentation of the BSC Outstanding Achievement Award 2010 Parallel Session 1: 14.00 – 15.30 Session Title Room Number Authors Meet Critics Panel – Public Criminology? John Foster Hall, Tilton and Professor Ian Loader and Professor Richard Sparks Swithland Suite Film Stream: U R Boss John Foster Hall, Quenby Suite Pirates, Paedophiles and Pimps: Representations of Crime in the 1.1 Media Craig Webber, University of Southampton THE WIRE, SHADOW CRIMINOLOGY AND EMPIRICAL RETREAT Maggie Wykes, University of Sheffield Gilbert 'CYBER-PAEDS': RECONSTRUCTING THE SEXUAL ABUSE OF CHILDREN Murray Hall, Seminar Martin Parker, University of Leicester Room 1 ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS: OUTLAWS, CRIME AND CULTURE Chair: Maggie Wykes, University of Sheffield 1.2 Drug Interventions in Criminal Justice Emma Wincup, University of Leeds BRINGING IN THE OUTSIDERS? SOCIAL REINTEGRATION AND DRUG POLICY Anthea Hucklesby, University of Leeds RESTRICTION ON BAIL: PLUGGING GAPS IN THE DRUG INTERVENTIONS Stamford PROGRAMME? Hall, Library Alex Stevens, University of Kent ALTERNATIVES TO WHAT? DRUG TREATMENT SENTENCES AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO PRISON OVERCROWDING AND EXPANSION Chair: Alex Stevens, University of Kent 1.3 Higher Education Forum for Learning and Development in Policing Allyson MacVean, University of Cumbria EMERGING FORMS OF POLICE RECRUIT TRAINING: ARE THEY FIT FOR PURPOSE? Stephen Tong, Canterbury Christ Church University GRADUATE POLICE OFFICERS: RELEASING THE POTENTIAL FOR PRE- Stamford EMPLOYMENT UNIVERSITY PROGRAMMES FOR ASPIRING POLICE Hall, Warden OFFICERS Room Stephen Moss, Liverpool John Moores University MEETING THE CHALLENGE OF THE POLICE PROFESSIONALISATION AGENDA – A CASE STUDY Chair: Dominic Wood, Canterbury Christ Church University 1.4 Contesting Risk Sandra Walklate, University of Liverpool CRIMINOLOGY AND SOCIETY: RECONSIDERING THE (AB)USES OF RISK Teela Sanders, University of Leeds Shirley RISKY SEXUALITY: CRIMINALISING SEX AND RELATIONSHIPS House Room 2 Hazel Kemshall, De Montfort University CRIME AND RISK: CONTESTING TERRITORY FOR RISK THEORISING Chair: Mary Bosworth, University of Oxford 1.5 The European Dimension of Criminal Justice Estella Baker, University of Sheffield WHAT CONTRIBUTION DO MEMBER STATES MAKE TO PENAL POLICY- MAKING IN THE EU? Shirley House Room Laure Guille, University of Leicester 3 POLICE AND JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN EUROPE: IS BILATERAL COOPERATION BEING LEFT ASIDE AND TAKEN OVER BY MULTILATERAL COOPERATION AT A SUPRANATIONAL LEVEL? Christopher Harding, Aberystwyth University CARTEL CRIMINALITY IN EUROPE: A COMPLEX GRID OF EUROPEAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE Chair: Christopher Harding, Aberystwyth University 1.6 Communicating Rehabilitation Nicholas Blagden, University of Huddersfield WHAT CAN BE DONE WITH INCARCERATED SEXUAL OFFENDERS WHO DENY THEIR OFFENDING? DILEMMAS, CONTROVERSIES AND DEBATES FOR TREATMENT MANAGEMENT Harriet Pierpoint, University of Glamorgan OFFENDERS WITH SPEECH AND LANGUAGE DISORDERS: A PILOT Shirley STUDY House Room 9 Sarah Pemberton, Nottingham Trent University “...THEY KIND OF USED WORDS THAT I WOULD NEVER HAVE USED LIKE... ‘SELF GRATIFICATION’ AND ...‘PRE COGNITIVE’ AND ALL THIS STUFF...”: THE IMPACT OF TREATMENT UPON CONVICTED ADULT RAPISTS TALK Chair: Harriet Pierpoint, University of Glamorgan 1.7 Writing Wrongs: Graffiti, Vandalism and Youth Crime Myra Taylor, University of Western Australia GRAFFITI: A NUSIANCE OFFENCE OR A TRAJECTORY TOWARDS SERIOUS CRIMINAL OFFENDING? Bridget Harris, Monash University Shirley HUMAN WRITES: ANTI-GRAFFITI INITIATIVES AND OTHERING House Room 11 Matthew Long, Nottingham Trent University and James Irving, Sheffield Hallam University ‘A SMASHING TIME’ – VANDALISM AND THE ‘CRIMINALYBER’ Chair: Matthew Long, Nottingham Trent University 1.8 Policing Disorder: Reflections on G20 Colin Rogers and James Gravelle, University of Glamorgan POLICING DISORDERS AND ENSURING RIGHTS – THE VALUE OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Shirley Stuart Twigg, University of Glamorgan House Room 'KETTLING', AND THE ALTERNATIVE IS? 12 Clifford Stott, University of Liverpool POLICING CROWD PSYCHOLOGY: G20, THE HMIC AND THE FUTURE OF PUBLIC ORDER POLICING IN THE UK James Hoggett, University of the West of England IS PUBLIC ORDER POLICE TRAINING IN ENGLAND AND WALES 'NURTURING THE BRITISH APPROACH TO POLICING' OR HEADING DOWN AN 'INTELLECTUAL CUL-DE-SAC'? Chair: Colin Rogers, University of Glamorgan The Social Life of the Prison – Perspectives from Beyond the West 1.9 (Facilitated by the Global Prisons Research Network – GPRN) Tomas Martin, Roskilde University "HUMAN RIGHTS MAKE OUR WORK EASIER” – THE PRAGMATIC IMPORT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN UGANDAN PRISONS Marie Rosenkrantz Lindegaard, Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement GANG AFFILIATION: A WAY TO BE SAFE IN A SOUTH AFRICAN JUVENILE PRISON John Foster Sasha Gear, Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation Hall, Rothley (CSVR) and Oakham THE SOCIAL PLACE OF SEX AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN SOUTH AFRICAN Suite MEN’S PRISONS Mahuya Bandyopadhyay, University of Delhi and Andrew Jefferson, Rehabilitation and Research Centre for Torture Victims, Denmark ENTANGLED INTERACTIONS: PRISONER-STAFF RELATIONS IN INDIA AND SIERRA LEONE Chair: Andrew Jefferson, Rehabilitation and Research Centre for Torture Victims, Denmark 1.10 Violence, Identity and Theoretical Criminology Simon Harding, University of Bedfordshire MY PET WEAPON: EXPLORING THE CULTURAL PHENOMENON OF STATUS DOGS AND WEAPON DOGS Simon Winlow, University of York RETALIATE FIRST: MEMORY, HUMILIATION AND MALE VIOLENCE John Foster Hall, Senior Tammy Ayres and James Treadwell, University of Leicester Common BARS, DRUGS AND FOOTBALL THUGS: COCAINE USE AMONGST Room ENGLISH FOOTBALL FIRMS Curtis Fogel, University of Guelph TOLERABLE VIOLENCE ON THE CANADIAN GRIDIRON Chair: James Treadwell, University of Leicester 1.11 Risk, Youth and Justice Stephen Case, Swansea University Shirley THE CHAOS OF RISK PREDICTION House Room 13 Di Kelly, De Montfort University MANAGEMENT OF RISK IN YOUTH JUSTICE PENAL POLICY: ARE OUR POLITICIANS SUBSCRIBING TO THE RULE OF LAW? Chair: Vicky Kemp, Legal Services Research Centre 1.12 Law, Retribution and Vengeance Simon Green, University of Hull MALADAPTED JUSTICE: THE CASE FOR VENGEANCE AND RETRIBUTION Shirley Mark Brown, University of Melbourne House Room THE NEW GULAG: POST-SENTENCE DETENTION AND SOCIAL HYGIENE 7 IN AUSTRALIA Chair: Simon Green, University of Hull Refreshment Break: 15.30 – 16.00 Gilbert Murray Hall, Junior Common Room Parallel Session 2: 16.00 – 17.30 Session Title Room Number Evaluating Police Behaviour, Research Focus Group 1 Gilbert Murray Hall, Senior Common Room Film Stream: 14 Days in May John Foster Hall, Quenby Suite 2.1 The Policy Value of Criminology – sponsored by SAGE Adam Crawford, University of Leeds DELIVERING CHANGE THROUGH POLICY: SOME LESSONS FROM THE ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR AND RESPECT AGENDA Gilbert Murray Hall, Janet Foster, London School of Economics Seminar CRIMINOLOGY CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE Room 1 Karen Evans and Sandra Walklate, University of Liverpool AFTER CORSTON – INTERPRETING AND IMPLEMENTING AN AGENDA FOR CHANGE Patrick Carr, Rutgers University CRIMINOLOGICAL PLURALISM OR CRIMINOLOGICAL CHIMERA? EVALUATING LOADER AND SPARKS’ CALL FOR A BIG-TENT CRIMINOLOGY Chair: Adam Crawford, University of Leeds 2.2 Art, Music and Crime Michael Rowe, Northumbria University IS YOUR CITY PRETTY ANYWAY? PERSPECTIVES ON GRAFFITI AND THE URBAN LANDSCAPE Stamford Jonathan Ilan, University of Kent Hall, Library THE INDUSTRY’S THE NEW ROAD: THE DECLINE OF STREET CULTURAL TROPES IN UK URBAN MUSIC Chair: Michael Rowe, Northumbria University 2.3 Racist Violence and Harassment Jon Garland and James Treadwell, University of Leicester ‘NO SURRENDER TO THE TALIBAN!’ FOOTBALL HOOLIGANISM, ISLAMOPHOBIA AND THE RISE OF THE ENGLISH DEFENCE LEAGUE Loretta Trickett, Nottingham Trent University FALLING THROUGH THE GAP: HOW HATE CRIME FAILS ASYLUM SEEKERS Stamford Bankole Cole, Northumbria University Hall, Warden YOUTH RACISM: IMPLICATIONS OF FINDINGS FROM RECENT STUDIES Room ON UK CHINESE VICTIMS OF RACIALLY MOTIVATED CRIME Corinne Funnell, Cardiff University WRITING WRONGS: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO HATE CRIME SCHOLARSHIP Chair: Jon Garland, University of Leicester Sex, Crime and Abjection: Interventions in Theory, Policy and Praxis 2.4 with Marginalised Groups Jo Phoenix, Durham University PROTECTION, CONSUMERISM, SEX AND YOUNG PEOPLE: THE NEW GOVERNANCE OF YOUTH SEXUALITY Shirley Laura Kelly, Durham University House, FAIR PLAY? ANALYSING SPORTS-BASED RESPONSES TO Room 11 MARGINALISED YOUNG PEOPLE Lizzie Seal, Durham University A GENEALOGY OF THE ’SOCIALLY INADEQUATE’ IN TWENTIETH CENTURY BRITAIN AND THE UNITED STATES Maggie O’Neill, Durham University CULTURE, CRIME AND JUSTICE: ASYLUM SEEKERS, REFUGEES AND THE UNDOCUMENTED Chair: Teela Sanders, University of Leeds 2.5 Financial Crime and the EU Brendan Quirke, Liverpool John Moores University CROATIA: FIGHTING EU FRAUD – A CASE OF WORK IN PROGRESS? Simone White, European Anti-Fraud Office Shirley DEBARMENT AT EU LEVEL: WHAT IS FAIR? House Room 3 Jackie Harvey, Northumbria University MONEY LAUNDERING: PHANTOMS, IMAGERY AND FACTS Chair: Brendan Quirke, Liverpool John Moores University 2.6 Anti-Social Behaviour Tom
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introductory Handbook on the Prevention of Recidivism and the Social Reintegration of Offenders
    Introductory Handbook on The Prevention of Recidivism and the Social Reintegration of Offenders CRIMINAL JUSTICE HANDBOOK SERIES Cover photo: © Rafael Olivares, Dirección General de Centros Penales de El Salvador. UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Introductory Handbook on the Prevention of Recidivism and the Social Reintegration of Offenders CRIMINAL JUSTICE HANDBOOK SERIES UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2018 © United Nations, December 2018. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. Preface The first version of the Introductory Handbook on the Prevention of Recidivism and the Social Reintegration of Offenders, published in 2012, was prepared for the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) by Vivienne Chin, Associate of the International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy, Canada, and Yvon Dandurand, crimi- nologist at the University of the Fraser Valley, Canada. The initial draft of the first version of the Handbook was reviewed and discussed during an expert group meeting held in Vienna on 16 and 17 November 2011.Valuable suggestions and contributions were made by the following experts at that meeting: Charles Robert Allen, Ibrahim Hasan Almarooqi, Sultan Mohamed Alniyadi, Tomris Atabay, Karin Bruckmüller, Elias Carranza, Elinor Wanyama Chemonges, Kimmett Edgar, Aida Escobar, Angela Evans, José Filho, Isabel Hight, Andrea King-Wessels, Rita Susana Maxera, Marina Menezes, Hugo Morales, Omar Nashabe, Michael Platzer, Roberto Santana, Guy Schmit, Victoria Sergeyeva, Zhang Xiaohua and Zhao Linna.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Nursery Programs
    Prison Nursery Programs Executive Summary Prison nursery programs (PNPs) provide incarcerated mothers with educational training in child development and parenting skills, while also giving them an opportunity to bond with their newborns. Eight states currently have PNPs; their policies and practices vary from state to state. The Missouri Department of Corrections currently has procedures for incarcerated pregnant women, including prenatal care, counseling, delivery, and follow-up care. Missouri currently does not offer a PNP for incarcerated pregnant women. Highlights ● In Missouri, approximately 1% of the incarcerated woman population is pregnant. ● PNPs are associated with reductions in recidivism and improved maternal mental health. ● Children of mothers in PNPs have lower rates of depression, anxiety, and learning disabilities than babies who were unable to maintain their mother-child connection. ● State PNPs differ in qualification criteria, staffing, procedures, offerings, and length of stay. Limitations ● Studies on the effectiveness of PNPs for reducing recidivism, improving mental health, and child development outcomes for the long-term are still ongoing. ● The relationship between the length of participation in a PNP and reduction in recidivism, improvements in mental health, and child development outcomes remains unknown. ● Low-risk offenders are eligible for participation in PNP programs; it is unknown how a program would affect recidivism and mental health in high-risk offenders. ● Most incarcerated women are likely to be afflicted with poverty, homelessness, substance abuse, mental illnesses and will often return to those same situations once leaving the corrections system. o Community aftercare programs that can provide additional support to mothers being released may be necessary to ensure they transition successfully back to life outside the corrections system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Crime and Criminal Justice”
    Fayetteville State University, the Department of Criminal Justice, and the Center for Community Justice & Service Learning Congratulate Dr. Melissa Hickman Barlow ACJS President, 2011-2012 and celebrate her accomplishments in pursuing Sustainable Justice. You are cordially invited to the President’s Reception on Wednesday, March 14, 2012 from 6:00 to 8:00 p. m. in the Marquis Ballroom. Dr. Jon Young, Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs Dr. James Anderson, Chancellor Fayetteville State University is a constituent institution of the University of North Carolina. Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences 49th Annual Meeting Sustainable Justice March 12-17, 2012 Marriott Marquis Times Square New York, New York Cover Photography by Kaitlyn Barlow www.kaitlynbarlow.com NOTICE TO ALL ATTENDEES Pursuant to the ACJS Code of Ethics and ACJS Policies, all ACJS Annual Meeting attendees should be aware of the following: 1. All attendees at the ACJS Annual Meeting shall abide by the ACJS Code of Ethics. A copy of the Code of Ethics can be found on the ACJS website, www.acjs.org. 2. No attendee shall have on his or her person a weapon of any type. 3. Any organization hosting an event in an ACJS meeting room or any Annual Meeting attendee assumes entire responsibility and hereby agrees to protect, indemnify, defend, and save ACJS and its employees, officers, volunteers, and representatives from and against all claims, losses, and damages to persons or property, governmental charges or fines, and attorneys fees arising out of or caused by the use of meeting or other space, excluding any liability caused by the sole negligence of the conference host hotel or ACJS, its employees, officers, volunteers, and representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Incarcerated Pregnancy: an Ethnographic Study of Perinatal Women in English Prisons
    The Incarcerated Pregnancy: An Ethnographic Study of Perinatal Women in English Prisons Laura Jane Abbott Submitted to the University of Hertfordshire in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Health Research (DHRes) February 2018 Contents Page Contents ………………………………………………………………………………………….. i Abstract …………………………………………………………………………………………… vi Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………………………… vii Abbreviations …………………………………………………………………………………….. viii Glossary ………………………………………………………………………………………….. ix List of Tables and Figures ………………………………………………………………………. x 1: Introduction and Background …………………………………………………………… 1 Demographics of female prisoners in the UK ….………………………………………… 1 Historical perspective ………………………………………………………………………. 3 Women in current UK prisons ……………………………………………………………... 3 Existing knowledge about pregnant women in prison …………………………………... 4 Theoretical perspectives: Criminology ……………………………………………………. 4 Minor disorders of pregnancy: normal physiological response ………………………... 7 Rights of the pregnant woman ……………………………………………………………... 8 Midwifery care in prison ……………………………………………………………………. 10 Personal motivation ………………………………………………………………………... 10 Research aim ……………………………………………………………………………….. 11 Chosen methodology ………………………………………………………………………. 11 Summary ……………………………………………………………………………...…….. 11 Chapter one: introduction and background ………………………………...……... 11 Chapter two: literature review ………………………………...…………………….. 11 Chapter three: methodology ………………………………………………………… 12 Chapter four: findings …………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Nurseries: Experiences of Incarcerated Women During
    JOURNAL OF OFFENDER REHABILITATION 2016, VOL. 55, NO. 1, 1–20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2015.1107001 Prison nurseries: Experiences of incarcerated women during pregnancy Stephanie Fritz and Kevin Whiteacre Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, University of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA ABSTRACT KEYWORDS The rate of incarceration for women has risen dramatically in the Correctional programming; past three decades. Many incarcerated women are pregnant female offenders; upon incarceration and give birth in prison. Prison nurseries incarcerated mothers; allow women to remain with their newborn babies within the offender rehabilitation; qualitative research; prison prison for a specified span of time. Evidence suggests such nursery programs increase mother–child attachment, improve parenting efficacy, and reduce participant recidivism. Through interviews with 27 formerly incarcerated women who gave birth while in prison, the present study compares the birth experiences of women participating in a prison nursery program and a group of women giving birth prior to implementation of the program. Introduction The growth in women’s incarceration rates in the United States is well documented (Carson, 2014; Chesney-Lind, 2002; Pollock, 2013; The Sentencing Project, 2012). Though women still comprise a small percentage (about 7%) of the total prison population, their incarceration rate has been growing faster than men’s in recent decades (Carson, 2014; Chesney-Lind, 2002; Pollock, 2013). Between 1990 and 2001, the number of incarcerated women increased by 114% compared to 80% for men (Pollock, 2013). Between 2003 and 2012, the average annual growth for women prisoners was 1.2% compared to 0.7% for men, and female prisoners sentenced to more than a year in state or federal prison grew by almost 3% between Downloaded by [Indiana University Libraries] at 09:11 17 December 2015 2012 and 2013, while male prisoners increased 0.2% (Carson, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • System Changer's Guide to Incarceration
    INCARCERATION SYSTEM CHANGER’S GUIDE TO INCARCERATION www.mibreastfeeding.org/incarceration SYSTEM CHANGER’S GUIDE TO INCARCERATION BREASTFEEDING IS GOOD FOR EVERYONE Breastfeeding is a public health imperative and research has long touted its tremendous nutritional, developmental, social, and environmental benefits for children, mothers, and society as a whole. The World Health Organization recommends breastfeeding until at least two years of age, the American Academy of Family Physicians for at least 12 months, and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life with continuation of breastfeeding for up to one year or longer as mutually desired by mother and child. Recent estimates show that over 800,000 child lives and 20,000 maternal lives could be saved each year if every child were exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life. Additionally, associated medical cost differences equaled a savings of $40.2 million per year (Breastfeeding Medicine, December 2017). Breastfeeding provides valuable protection against acute illnesses such as diarrhea, pneumonia, and upper respiratory infections in addition to protection against Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), particularly during the first year of life (Pediatrics, October 2017). Breastfeeding benefits extend well beyond infancy, providing lasting health benefits with lower incidences of allergy, asthma, high blood pressure, and obesity as breastfed infants enter into childhood and adolescence. In addition to these health benefits, breastfeeding promotes social and emotional development as well. Breastfeeding contributes to positive maternal self-image and the development of a stable, nurturing maternal-infant relationship. The emotional security and warmth developed within the breastfeeding relationship promotes an early and secure attachment for the child, which is central to subsequent development.
    [Show full text]
  • Cafeteria, Commissary and Cooking: Foodways and Negotiations of Power and Identity in a Women’S Prison
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2013 Cafeteria, Commissary and Cooking: Foodways and Negotiations of Power and Identity in a Women’s Prison Amy Brooks Smoyer Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1974 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] CAFETERIA, COMMISSARY AND COOKING: FOODWAYS AND NEGOTIATIONS OF POWER AND IDENTITY IN A WOMEN’S PRISON by AMY B. SMOYER A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Social Welfare in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2013 ii © 2013 AMY BROOKS SMOYER All Rights Reserved iii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Social Welfare in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ______Deborah L. Tolman. EdD_______________ ________________________ _________________________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee ______Harriet Goodman, DSW________________ ________________________ _________________________________________ Date Executive Officer ______Mimi Abramovitz, DSW________________ ______Willie Tolliver, DSW__________________ ______Rosemary Barberet, PhD________________ Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iv ABSTRACT CAFETERIA, COMMISSARY AND COOKING: FOODWAYS AND NEGOTIATIONS OF POWER AND IDENTITY IN A WOMEN’S PRISON by Amy B. Smoyer Adviser: Professor Deborah L. Tolman This study uses foodways theory to build knowledge about the lived experience of incarceration by analyzing women’s narratives about prison food and eating.
    [Show full text]
  • Baby Cribs in Prison Cells: Assessing Opinions About Prison Nursery Programs by Humanizing Incarcerated Mothers Erin Ostheimer Union College - Schenectady, NY
    Union College Union | Digital Works Honors Theses Student Work 6-2016 Baby Cribs in Prison Cells: Assessing Opinions About Prison Nursery Programs by Humanizing Incarcerated Mothers Erin Ostheimer Union College - Schenectady, NY Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses Part of the Community-Based Research Commons, Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Ostheimer, Erin, "Baby Cribs in Prison Cells: Assessing Opinions About Prison Nursery Programs by Humanizing Incarcerated Mothers" (2016). Honors Theses. 194. https://digitalworks.union.edu/theses/194 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Union | Digital Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Union | Digital Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Baby Cribs in Prison Cells: Assessing Opinions about Prison Nursery Programs by Humanizing Incarcerated Mothers By Erin Ostheimer * * * * * * * * Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Honors in the Department of Sociology UNION COLLEGE March, 2016 ABSTRACT OSTHEIMER, ERIN Baby Cribs in Prison Cells: Assessing Opinions about Prison Nursery Programs by Humanizing Incarcerated Mothers. Department of Sociology, March 2016. ADVISOR: Janet Grigsby Through my research, I analyzed prison nursery programs in the United States. Prison nurseries are programs that exist in nine states that allow mothers who are pregnant when they are incarcerated to keep their infants with them in prison for a finite amount of time. Previous scholarship on the topic has shown that prison nurseries are effective in reducing rates of recidivism and fostering a bond between mother and infant.
    [Show full text]
  • International Report on the Conditions of Children of Incarcerated Parents a Survey of Prison Nurseries
    International Report on the Conditions of Children of Incarcerated Parents A Survey of Prison Nurseries Author: Melanie Paurus (The University of Minnesota) International Survey of Prison Nurseries Introduction Children of Incarcerated Caregivers (CIC) has compiled information on the status of children in other countries who are affected by the incarceration of a caregiver. The United States is distinct in its tendency to separate young children from their mothers upon incarceration. Internationally, it is much more common for young children to accompany their incarcerated caregiver to prison. Prison nurseries—more broadly defined as the facilities designated to provide services for children incarcerated with their caregivers—exist in most countries around the world. Whether prison nursery placement is in the best interest of a child depends on the conditions of the prison nursery and the alternatives available to the child. Research reveals that where prison nurseries are thoughtfully designed to serve the best interests of children, they may present a compelling form of alternative sentencing, This survey focuses primarily on children residing with caregivers in prison and the conditions of prison nurseries. Prison nurseries take many forms throughout the world, and children in these facilities have a broad range of experiences. In evaluating prison nursery programs, however, the framework applied is simply whether these institutions serve the “best interest of the child.” This standard was recommended by the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) following their “children of incarcerated parents” General Day of Discussion (DGD). i Outside of the United States, and where allowed by law, it is most often assumed that children within an established age limit will accompany their caregivers to prison for a portion or the totality of the sentence.
    [Show full text]
  • Babies Behind Bars: an Evaluation of Prison Nurseries in American Female Prisons and Their Potential Constitutional Challenges
    Pace Law Review Volume 35 Issue 3 Spring 2015 Article 8 April 2015 Babies Behind Bars: An Evaluation of Prison Nurseries in American Female Prisons and Their Potential Constitutional Challenges Seham Elmalak Pace University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Juvenile Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation Seham Elmalak, Babies Behind Bars: An Evaluation of Prison Nurseries in American Female Prisons and Their Potential Constitutional Challenges, 35 Pace L. Rev. 1080 (2015) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr/vol35/iss3/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Babies Behind Bars: An Evaluation of Prison Nurseries in American Female Prisons and Their Potential Constitutional Challenges Seham Elmalak I. Introduction The focus of the legal profession, perhaps even the obsessive focus, has been on the process for determining guilt or innocence. When someone has been judged guilty . the legal profession seems to lose all interest. When the prisoner is taken way, our attention turns to the next case. When the door is locked against the prisoner, we do not think about what is behind it.1 The harsh reality is that most Americans have little knowledge or concern about what happens behind prison walls.2 Unless a story of extreme cruelty floods the media or if a prisoner riot breaks out, prisoners’ issues generally are far removed from the popular consciousness.3 This simply should not be the case.
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Nurseries: a Review of Maternal and Infant Rooming in Outcomes for Incarcerated Mothers
    Prison Nurseries: A Review of Maternal and Infant Rooming in Outcomes for Incarcerated Mothers Amanda Dowling, BA, BMW, RM and Colleen Fulton, MA, BMW RM ABSTRACT Women are the fastest growing prison population in Canada, and at incarceration, 4-10 percent of women are pregnant. These women, their correctional facilities, and Canadian health care services are increasingly forced to address the issues of motherhood and Amanda Dowling, BA, reproductive health care during incarceration. Most incarcerated BMW, RM is a practicing women are separated from their infants soon after birth. The authors midwife serving the East claim that prison nurseries, as a harm reduction strategy, are a positive Vancouver area. She alternative to this separation. Midwives could play a valuable role in has a BA in History and these health care units. Women’s Studies from the Methods: This paper is a literature review examining the outcomes University of Victoria, and a of mother-infant dyads who have access to prison nurseries. The Bachelor of Midwifery from search strategy included 15 health research databases, applying similar the University of British search terms to all databases. Columbia. KEYWORDS Colleen Fulton, MA, BMW, prison nursery, rooming in, women, pregnancy, incarceration, infants RM isa practicing midwife in Vancouver, British This article has been peer reviewed. Columbia. Canadian Journal of Midwifery Research and Practice Volume 16, Number 2, 2017 35 BACKGROUND incarcerated fathers are primary care providers. In 2013, the Alouette Correctional
    [Show full text]
  • Children of Incarcerated Parents
    HILDRE N OF N ATIO N AL C C O N FERE nc E nc AR C ERATED ARE N T S of I P STATE LEGI S LATURE S By Steve Christian March 2009 he nation’s growing prison and jail population has raised serious questions about the collateral effects of incarceration on children, families and communities. Whatever one’s views about the appropriate role Tof incarceration in the criminal justice system, it is clear that imprisonment disrupts positive, nurturing relationships between many parents—particularly mothers—and their children. In addition, many families with children suffer economic strain and instability when a parent is imprisoned. Research suggests that intervening in the lives of incarcerated parents and their children to preserve and strengthen positive family connections can yield positive societal benefits in the form of reduced recidivism, less intergenerational criminal justice system involvement, and promotion of healthy child development. In the words of one prominent researcher, “[s]tudies . indicate that families are important to prisoners and to the achievement of major social goals, including the prevention of recidivism and delinquency.”1 Because this area is fraught with major data gaps, it is recommended that policymakers begin their exploration of the subject by posing a series of questions to their staffs and the heads of agencies with jurisdiction over law enforcement, corrections, child welfare, education and welfare, as well as child advocates, the university com- munity and others who have an interest in ensuring the well-being of children whose parents are in custody. This report proposes a list of such questions, each followed by a discussion that is intended, not so much as a definitive answer, but as general background information.
    [Show full text]