DOCSLIB.ORG

Tiny Marsh Important Bird Area Conservation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tiny Marsh Important Bird Area Conservation Plan Tiny Marsh Important Bird Area Conservation Plan May 2001 Prepared for the Tiny Marsh Important Bird Area Stakeholders by William Wilson and Edward Cheskey Table of Contents Acknowledgments .........................................................................................................................................................2 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................3 2.0 The Important Bird Area Program..........................................................................................................................4 3.0 IBA Site Information...............................................................................................................................................5 4.0 IBA Species Information.........................................................................................................................................7 4.1 Why Tiny Marsh Is an Important Bird Area........................................................................................................7 4.2 Natural History of IBA Species...........................................................................................................................8 4.2.1 Black Tern (Chilidonias niger).....................................................................................................................8 4.2.1.1 Distribution and abundance ...................................................................................................................8 4.2.2.2 Natural history ......................................................................................................................................9 4.2.2 Least Bittern (Ixobrychus exilis).................................................................................................................10 4.2.2.1 Distribution and abundance .................................................................................................................10 4.2.2.2 Natural history .....................................................................................................................................11 4.2.3 King Rail (Rallus elegans)..........................................................................................................................12 4.2.3.1 Distribution and abundance .................................................................................................................12 4.2.3.2 Natural history .....................................................................................................................................13 5.0 Other Elements of High Conservation Value ........................................................................................................14 6.0 Land Ownership and Use ......................................................................................................................................14 6.1 Land Ownership ................................................................................................................................................14 6.2 Land Use............................................................................................................................................................14 6.2.1 Historical ....................................................................................................................................................14 6.2.2 Current........................................................................................................................................................15 7.0 Conservation Management Achieved at Tiny Marsh ............................................................................................16 8.0 Stakeholders ..........................................................................................................................................................17 9.0 Opportunities .........................................................................................................................................................18 10.0 Threats................................................................................................................................................................19 11.0 The Action Plan...................................................................................................................................................20 11.1 Vision ..........................................................................................................................................................20 11.2 Goals and Objectives.......................................................................................................................................20 12.0 Evaluation............................................................................................................................................................23 References ...................................................................................................................................................................24 Appendix 1 IBA Program Partners............................................................................................................................26 Appendix 2. Least Bittern Survey, Tiny Marsh and Matchedash Bay ....................................................................27 Appendix 3 Final Report by the MTM-IBA Committee ...........................................................................................28 Introduction ............................................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Acknowledgments ................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Methods................................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Survey Techniques .................................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Results of Black Tern Surveys at Tiny Marsh......................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Least Bittern, Tiny Marsh and Matchedash Bay ..................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Discussion ............................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Black Tern Surveys, Tiny Marsh......................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Least Bittern, Tiny Marsh and Matchedash Bay ................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Habitat Observations ........................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Table of Figures Figure 1. Black Tern......................................................................................................................................3 Figure 2. Tiny Marsh Important Bird Area Location Map ............................................................................6 Figure 3. Tiny Marsh Provincial Wildlife Area and IBA Boundaries ...........................................................7 1 Acknowledgments The Important Bird Area (IBA) Program is part of the Natural Legacy 2000 program, a nation- wide initiative to conserve wildlife and habitats on private and public lands. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Government of Canada's Millennium Partnership Program. We also acknowledge the financial support of the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation to Great Lakes Basin Important Bird Areas. Canadian Nature Federation and Bird Studies Canada are the national partners of BirdLife International in Canada. The Federation of Ontario Naturalists is responsible for site conservation planning in Ontario IBAs. The following people, listed alphabetically by last name, were part of the Tiny Marsh IBA Steering committee. They have contributed considerable time and effort to the development of this conservation plan, and the conservation of Tiny Marsh: Jim Broadfoot, Robin Craig, Andy Fletcher, Dorothy and Sid Hadlington, Margo Holt, Mike Lavin, Bob Livsey, Dave McLachlin, Dan Middleton, Kevin Rich, and Jim and Pat Woodford. The following agencies and organizations have contributed to the development of this conservation plan: MTM Conservation Association Inc. Ducks Unlimited Canada Canadian Wildlife Service Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Orillia Field Naturalists Midland-Penetanguishene Field Naturalists Photographic credit: Figure 1. Black Tern: Bird Studies Canada Citation: Wilson, W.G. and E.D. Cheskey 2001. Tiny Marsh Important Bird Area Conservation Plan. Can. Nature Fed., Bird Studies Can., Fed. of Ont. Naturalists. 26 pages plus 3 appendices. 2 1.0 Introduction Camille was mesmerized by the aerial acrobatics of the elegant, sooty black birds swooping and darting in pursuit of flying insects over the expanse of open water. His eyes followed the ballet back and forth. “I wish I could fly,” he told me, giving voice to my exact thoughts. If ever a bird made me want to fly, it had to be this species, a master of graceful and effortless flight. Later, reflecting on his first “birdathon,” Camille confided that Black Tern was his favourite
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
    [Show full text]
  • Navigating the Swamp: Lessons on Wetland Offsetting for Ontario
    NAVIGATING THE SWAMP Lessons on wetland offsetting for Ontario Ontarioa Nature’s GreenwayNavigating Guide the Series Swamp: Lessons on wetland offsetting for Ontario Navigating the Swamp: Lessons on Wetland Offsetting for Ontario July 2017 David W. Poulton, M.A., LL.M, and Anne Bell, Ph.D. Acknowledgements The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the following people who provided valuable information and insights: Suzanne Armstrong, Shari Clare, Royal Gardner, Arlene Kwasniak, Larry McDermott, Angus Norman, Joanna Salsberg and Joshua Wise. Further, staff in government agencies and environmental groups across Canada were generous with their time, explaining the various offset systems across Canada. For that we thank Kamal Abdel-Razek, Craig Bishop, Lyle Gawalko, Thorsten Hebben, Peter Joyce, Anish Neupane and Christie Ward. Note, however, that the views presented in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the aforementioned individuals. Of course, the authors take responsibility for any errors inadvertently made in conveying the information provided by the people mentioned above. This report was made possible through the generous support of The McLean Foundation. Review: Sarah Hedges, Ron Corkum Copy editor: Sarah Weber Design: Lauren McVittie Cover photos: (top) Joe Crowley, (left to right) Peter Ferguson, Peter Ferguson, Missy Mandel, Scott Gillingwater This guide can be downloaded free of charge from the Ontario Nature website, ontarionature.org/publications. Copyright © 2017: Ontario Nature Navigating the Swamp: Lessons on wetland offsetting for Ontario Executive Summary The Government of Ontario is proposing to develop a wetland offsetting policy to enable compensation for the negative impacts of development through the restoration or creation of new wetlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Desktop Biodiversity Report
    Desktop Biodiversity Report Land at Balcombe Parish ESD/14/747 Prepared for Katherine Daniel (Balcombe Parish Council) 13th February 2014 This report is not to be passed on to third parties without prior permission of the Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre. Please be aware that printing maps from this report requires an appropriate OS licence. Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre report regarding land at Balcombe Parish 13/02/2014 Prepared for Katherine Daniel Balcombe Parish Council ESD/14/74 The following information is included in this report: Maps Sussex Protected Species Register Sussex Bat Inventory Sussex Bird Inventory UK BAP Species Inventory Sussex Rare Species Inventory Sussex Invasive Alien Species Full Species List Environmental Survey Directory SNCI M12 - Sedgy & Scott's Gills; M22 - Balcombe Lake & associated woodlands; M35 - Balcombe Marsh; M39 - Balcombe Estate Rocks; M40 - Ardingly Reservior & Loder Valley Nature Reserve; M42 - Rowhill & Station Pastures. SSSI Worth Forest. Other Designations/Ownership Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty; Environmental Stewardship Agreement; Local Nature Reserve; National Trust Property. Habitats Ancient tree; Ancient woodland; Ghyll woodland; Lowland calcareous grassland; Lowland fen; Lowland heathland; Traditional orchard. Important information regarding this report It must not be assumed that this report contains the definitive species information for the site concerned. The species data held by the Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre (SxBRC) is collated from the biological recording community in Sussex. However, there are many areas of Sussex where the records held are limited, either spatially or taxonomically. A desktop biodiversity report from SxBRC will give the user a clear indication of what biological recording has taken place within the area of their enquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Ontario Hunting Regulations Summary
    Map 1 – Southwestern Ontario Tobermory ! Map 1 Wildlife Management Unit (WMU) Boundaries o NORTHERN 010 20 40 60 80 100 Kilometres BRUCE WMU boundaries are roads, lakes, rivers and other physical PENINSULA features wherever possible. For many roads and rivers, only 1:1,400,000 GE the portions that form WMU boundaries are shown on the map. O 83A R For detailed information on WMU boundaries, G 10 83C I visit ontario.ca/hunting. ! A ! N o 83B ALL WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT UNITS SHOWN ON MAP 1 N GEORGIAN B ARE IN THE “SOUTHERN DISTRICT FOR WATERFOWL”. BLUFFS A Y O Southampton SOUTH10 BRUCE PENINSULA ! 82C Port Elgin R o ! "Owen SAUGEEN Sound Meaford ! Legend SHORES U o ARRAN- 6/10 Municipality licence required to ELDERSLIE hunt pheasant and rabbit 82B H 40 ! BRUCE CHATSWORTH o MNR District or Area Office Kincardine ! Chesley ! Collingwood BROCKTON Saugeen THE BLUE Provincial or National Park E 10 82A MOUNTAINS 84 SIMCOE r HURON- Walkerton ! WEST GREY ! ! G R E Y Stayner Wildlife Management Area K KINLOSS GREY 29 Hanover ! Durham HIGHLANDS 42 Municipal Boundary - A 86 SOUTH BRUCE River 124 85A CLEARVIEW District and Upper Tier Municipalities ASHFIELD- L o COLBORNE- Municipal Boundary - WAWANOSH ! Wingham SOUTHGATE !81B Goderich ! MELANCTHON Lower and Single Tier Municipalities NORTH 15 18 ! Mount Forest HURON HOWICK MINTO ! MULMUR International or Interprovincial 8 89 81A 4 Harriston Boundary DUFFERIN MORRIS- TURNBERRY ! WELLINGTON 8! NORTH MONO 7 Ontario King's Highway " Clinton Palmerston CENTRAL HURON! 85B 10 7 HURON EAST EAST LUTHER AMARANTH GRAND VALLEY !9 County/Regional Highway NORTH MAPLETON ! 37 HURON PERTH EAST Orangeville 80 GARAFRAXA BLUEWATER WELLINGTON 509 Secondary Highway N 93C Mitchell 86A CENTRE ! 85C WELLINGTON Erin ! ! WEST PERTH Elmira 87C o o Exeter PERTH EAST ! LAMBTON WELLESLEY WOOLWICH POINT SOUTH HURON PERTH WMU Boundary and Number SHORES 5 GUELPH/ EDWARD WATERLOO ERAMOSA Forest! Halton 5 NORTH MIDDLESEX ! SARNIA Stratford Guelph ! PLYMPTON- 86B Waterloo MILTON Hills PERTH SOUTH ! " ! WYOMING Ausable R.
    [Show full text]
  • S Conservation Activities on Ramsar Wetlands from March 1996 to February 1997 6 April 1998
    Ducks Unlimited's Conservation Activities on Ramsar Wetlands from March 1996 to February 1997 6 April 1998 At the 6th Ramsar Conference of the Parties in Brisbane, March 1996, Dr Alan Wentz, representing Ducks Unlimited, made an intervention which was summarized in the Conference Report (paragraph 267) as follows: "Ducks Unlimited, noting its previous financial commitments to Ramsar sites in several countries, pledged on behalf of Ducks Unlimited organizations in Australia, Canada, Europe, Mexico, New Zealand, and the USA, to commit at least SFR 3.1 million in fiscal year 1996-97 for habitat protection, restoration and management, wetland education and training programs at 21 Ramsar sites worldwide and in support of National Ramsar Committees and proposed listings of new sites, in addition to its US$ 68 million earmarked in 1996/97 for other wetland initiatives outside of Ramsar sites but in support of Ramsar objectives." This is a reprint of the text of Ducks Unlimited's 8-page printed report on its Ramsar-related activities from March 1996 to February 1997, just issued and available free from Ducks Unlimited, Inc., One Waterfowl Way, Memphis, Tennessee 38120-2351, USA (fax +1 901 758 3850). Table 1, listing expenditures at individual sites (pages 6-7) totalling SFR 3,028,714.63, has not been reproduced here, and the map of Ramsar sites on page 8 has been reproduced mainly ornamentally and not at a large enough file size really to be legible. Consult the printed report for these details. The text is reprinted here with permission. Intro . During the 1996 Ramsar Conference of the Parties in Brisbane, Australia, Ducks Unlimited pledged 3.1 million Swiss francs to be spent for habitat protection, restoration and enhancement, and wetland education and training programs at Ramsar sites; as well as support of National Ramsar Committees and proposed listings of new sites.
    [Show full text]
  • NOMINATION and LISTING of WETLANDS of INTERNATIONAL IMPORTANCE in CANADA Procedures Manual
    NOMINATION AND LISTING OF WETLANDS OF INTERNATIONAL IMPORTANCE IN CANADA Procedures Manual Revised Edition November 1999 Compiled by C..D.A. Rubec Wildlife Conservation Branch Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada First Edition February 1994 Revised Edition November 1999 This document. Nomination and Listing of Wetlands of International Importance in Canada: Procedures Manual has been produced as one of a series of Canadian Ramsar Network Reports . These documents provide information and general guidance to Ramsar site managers and decision makers involved in the implementation of the Ramsar Convention within Canadian jurisdictions . This report is designed to be updated on a periodic basis as new Ramsar site nomination or designation criteria and procedures are adopted by the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance . Copies of this Report are available from: Wildlife Conservation Branch Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, Ontario _ K1A OH3 NOMINATION AND LISTING OF WETLANDS OF INTERNATIONAL IMPORTANCE IN CANADA Procedures Manual Revised Edition November 1999 Compiled by C .D.A. Rubec Wildlife Conservation Branch Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada First Edition February 1994 Revised Edition November 1999 This document Nomination and Listing of Wetlands of International Importance in Canada: Procedures Manual has been produced as one of a series of Canadian Ramsar Network Reports . These documents provide information and general guidance to Ramsar site managers and decision makers involved in the implementation of the Ramsar Convention within Canadian jurisdictions. This .report is designed to be updated on a periodic basis as new Ramsar site nomination or designation criteria and procedures are adopted by the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance .
    [Show full text]
  • The Council Study
    The Mekong River Commission THE COUNCIL STUDY STUDY ON THE SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE MEKONG RIVER, INCLUDING IMPACTS OF MAINSTREAM HYDROPOWER PROJECTS BioRA PROGRESS REPORT 1: APPENDIX D: Field Trip Part I: Specialist’s Field Notes April 2015 Appendix D. FIELD TRIP PART I – SPECIALISTS’ NOTES This appendix presents summary trip notes, insights and comments on Field Trip Part I: Mekong Delta and Tonle Sap Great Lake from the specialists as follows: Dr Lois Koehnken: Sediment, water quality and geomorphology Dr Dirk Lamberts Tonle Sap Great Lake processes Dr Andrew MacDonald Vegetation Prof. Nguyen Thi Ngoc Anh Delta macrophytes Ms Duong Thi Hoang Oanh Delta algae Dr Ian Campbell Macroinvertebrates Prof. Ian Cowx Fish Dr Kenzo Utsugi Delta fish Dr Duc Hoang Minh Herpetofauna Mr Anthony Stones Birds and mammals. These contributions have been left fairly unstructured, as the intention here was to capture individual impressions of (and responses to the opportunities to see parts of) the ecosystem and its users. D.1. DR LOIS KOEHNKEN (SEDIMENTS, WATER QUALITY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY LEAD SPECIALIST) The Council Study field trip provided an extended opportunity to discuss the various disciplines with the NMC representatives and international specialists. Especially useful was being able to discuss the ‘linkages’ between the disciplines within the DRIFT context. During the trip, observations and linkages that were highlighted and discussed in the fields of geomorphology, sediment transport and water quality included: The turbidity levels in the canals in the delta were much higher than those present in the mainstream Mekong or Bassac on the same days. This demonstrated that the canals generate additional suspended sediment in the system, which needs to be considered within the context of DRIFT.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Birds from the Maldives, with Notes on Other Species
    FORKTAIL 17 (2001): 67–73 New records of birds from the Maldives, with notes on other species R. CHARLES ANDERSON and MICHAEL BALDOCK Twelve species of bird were recorded from the Maldives for the first time: Lesser Whistling-duck Dendrocygna javanica, Fork-tailed Swift Apus pacificus, Spotted Redshank Tringa erythropus, Pomarine Jaeger Stercorarius pomarinus, Brahminy Kite Haliastur indus, Jouanin’s Petrel Bulweria fallax, Streaked Shearwater Calonectris leucomelas, Swinhoe’s Storm-petrel Oceanodroma monorhis, Leach’s Storm-petrel O. leucorhoa, Long-tailed Shrike Lanius schach, Red-rumped Swallow Hirundo daurica and Streak-throated Swallow H. fluvicola. In addition, published records of Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis, Rose-ringed Parakeet Psittacula krameri, Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybridus, Red-billed Tropicbird Phaethon aethereus, and Forest Wagtail Dendronanthus indicus were not included in the 1994 checklist of birds (J. S. Ash and A. Shafeeg, The birds of the Maldives. Forktail 10: 1-31). This raises the total number of bird species recorded from the islands to 167. Unusual records of other species, and recent bird conservation measures in the Maldives are noted. INTRODUCTION tuna schools, and is essential for the successful operation of the fishery. In addition, a book on Maldivian seabirds The birds of the Maldives were recently reviewed by by Ahmed Shafeeg (1993), which was available to Ash Ash and Shafeeg (1994). They listed 150 species, with a and Ali Shafeeg (1994) only in manuscript form, has further ten species listed as unconfirmed. Five other been published. (Ali Shafeeg is the son of Ahmed species have been recorded from the Maldives, but were Shafeeg).
    [Show full text]
  • THE COMMON TERN in SOUTII AUSTRALIA by JOHN -ECKERT
    THE S.A. ORNITHOLOGIST 87 THE COMMON TERN IN SOUTII AUSTRALIA By JOHN -ECKERT On January 26, 1967 a flock of about study skin, the other three being taken to 50 Crested Terns (Sterna bergii) were the S.A. Museum intact. resting on the sand near the Murray Mouth. Later in February, John Endersby found With them were 12 to 20 smaller terns with some of these terns present in the same area black bills and black caps, but with the but a further visit by myself on March 27 forehead white. I assumed that they must was unsuccessful. However a bird of similar be immature Fairy Terns (Sterna nereis), appearance was in the same vicinity on but took two as specimens. When measuring October 22 and a week later at least two these birds later, it became obvious from were present at a freshwater swamp on their length of 13 inches that they could 'Poltalloch Plains,' 9 miles south of Welling­ not be Fairy Terns. The long forked tails ton. These were among a flock of some ruled out the possibility of either the Marsh 5,000 Marsh Terns and 20 Crested Terns. Tern (Chlidonias hybrida) or White-winged They were distinguishable from the Marsh Black Tern (C. leucopteris). Although my Terns by their slightly larger size and long, knowledge of the rarer terns was almost nil, deeply forked tails. They showed a willing­ I had made a copy of diagrams of primary ness to perch on posts in the water, a habit feathers shown by Hitchcock (1965a). From shared by the Crested but not the Marsh these I was able to deduce that the birds Terns.
    [Show full text]
  • Dallas Taylor M.Sc Thesis
    EFFECTS OF IMPOUNDMENT OF COASTAL WETLANDS IN GEORGIAN BAY LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF IMPOUNDMENT ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONS OF COASTAL WETLANDS IN GEORGIAN BAY By DALLAS TAYLOR, B.Sc. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies In Partial Fulfillments of the Requirements For the Degree Masters of Science McMaster University ©Copyright by Dallas Taylor, April 2014 McMaster University MASTER OF SCIENCE (2014) Hamilton, Ontario (Biology) TITLE: Long-term Effects of Impoundment on Ecosystem Functions of Coastal Wetlands in Georgian Bay AUTHOR: Dallas Taylor, B.Sc. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Dr. Patricia Chow-Fraser NUMBER OF PAGES: xi, 97 ii PREFACE This Master of Science thesis is composed of two chapters formatted as individual manuscripts to be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. These chapters have been put into context with a unifying theme discussed in a general introduction and conclusion. The first chapter has been submitted to the journal Wetlands, Ecology and Management and we are in the preliminary stages of considering a journal for the second chapter. As the author of this thesis, and under the supervision of Dr. Patricia Chow- Fraser, I collected and analyzed all data presented that are not otherwise referenced and wrote both chapters presented. All field work and data were collected with the help of dedicated field technicians. Taylor, D.R. & Chow-Fraser, P. Comparison of long-term changes in wetland communities of a diked and undiked wetland in southern Georgian Bay Taylor, D.R. & Chow-Fraser, P. Ecosystem changes in a chain of beaver impounded wetlands in eastern Georgian Bay: a glimpse of the future in a low water-level crisis iii GENERAL ABSTRACT Seasonal and annual water-level fluctuation is a primary mechanism that maintains high aquatic biodiversity in coastal marshes of the Laurentian Great Lakes by preventing formation of dense mono-cultures of emergent or submergent plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Minesing Wetlands Biological Inventory
    Minesing Wetlands Biological Inventory February 2007 Prepared for: Friends of Minesing Wetlands Minesing Wetlands Biological Inventory & Nottawasaga Valley Conservation12/13/2007 Authority Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority MINESING WETLANDS BIOLOGICAL INVENTORY Prepared by ROBERT L. BOWLES, JOLENE LAVERTY and DAVID FEATHERSTONE February 2007 Prepared for Friends of Minesing Wetlands & Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority Minesing Wetlands Biological Inventory 12/13/2007 Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority FOREWARD The Minesing Wetlands Biological Inventory and Evaluation was conducted during 2005-2006 field season. Technical investigations were conducted within the Minesing Wetlands by Bowles Environmental Consultants and Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority (NVCA) for the NVCA Minesing Wetlands Management Plan and for Friends of Minesing Wetlands (FOMW). This report received technical review prior to its publication and does not necessarily signify that its contents reflect the views and policies of the Friends of Minesing Wetlands or their partners; nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. For additional copies of this report or information about NVCA or FOMW, please contact: Nottawasaga Valley Conservation Authority Centre for Conservation John Hix Conservation Administration Centre 8195 Concession Line 8 Utopia, Ontario L0M 1T0 Phone: (705) 424-1479 Fax: (705) 424-2115 www.nvca.on.ca Friends of Minesing Wetlands www.minesingswamp.ca Minesing Wetlands
    [Show full text]
  • Greenprint: How We Can Stop the Sprawl
    Greenprint: How we can stop the sprawl by Helena Rusak Beyond the Greenbelt, urban hotspots expand and highways multiply. Is there a cure for sprawl? Ontario Nature’s strategy for a livable landscape Picture this: You are being taken on a fantastic aerial tour of southern Ontario. As if you were sitting in an IMAX theatre, you are surrounded by sounds and images of unsurpassed size, clarity and impact. You feel yourself soaring over the landscape. This virtual experience is highly realistic, except that the narrator tells you the year is 2025: the near future. What does southern Ontario look like 20 years from now? From your vantage point in the sky, you can see rolling hills of farmland and some smaller woodlots, many of them set off in perfect squares and rectangles below. A dense network of roads and highways stretches across the landscape. The river valleys retain a slim buffer of trees and vegetation. Ironically, the sprawling cities and towns, with their irregular boundaries, have taken on a more organic form than nature has. Urban areas are the new closed canopy of southern Ontario. In the Greater Golden Horseshoe area, this is particularly evident: since 2005, 3 million more people are living and working in the region, 9 million more cars are on its roads and as much as 1,070 more square kilometres have been swallowed up by urban centres - a staggering 45 percent increase in urbanized land. Today we are at a crossroads in our planning for the future of southern Ontario. Provincial decisions made now regarding land use and urban growth will determine what kind of landscape you might fly over in 20 or 30 years.
    [Show full text]