DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 Stainless Steels in Ammonia Production

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 Stainless Steels in Ammonia Production STAINLESS STEELS IN AMMONIA PRODUCTION A DESIGNERS’ HANDBOOK SERIES NO 9013 Produced by Distributed by AMERICAN IRON NICKEL AND STEEL INSTITUTE INSTITUTE STAINLESS STEELS IN AMMONIA PRODUCTION A DESIGNERS’ HANDBOOK SERIES NO 9013 Originally, this handbook was published in 1978 by the Committee of Stainless Steel Producers, American Iron and Steel Institute. The Nickel Institute republished the handbook in 2020. Despite the age of this publication the information herein is considered to be generally valid. Material presented in the handbook has been prepared for the general information of the reader and should not be used or relied on for specific applications without first securing competent advice. The Nickel Institute, the American Iron and Steel Institute, their members, staff and consultants do not represent or warrant its suitability for any general or specific use and assume no liability or responsibility of any kind in connection with the information herein. Nickel Institute [email protected] www.nickelinstitute.org CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................ 4 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ............ 5 CORROSIVES IN AMMONIA PROCESSES ............... 5 CONSIDERATIONS FOR SELECTING STAINLESS STEELS .......................................... 6 Desulfurization of Natural Gas ....................... 6 Catalytic Steam Reforming of Natural Gas ....................... 6 Carbon Monoxide Shift .............. 8 Removal of Carbon Dioxide . 10 Methanation ............................. 11 Synthesis of Ammonia ............. 11 Turbine-Driven Centrifugal Compression Trains ............ 14 STAINLESS STEELS ................... 15 Metallurgical Structure ............. 16 High-Temperature Mechanical Properties ........ 16 Thermal Conductivity ............... 20 Oxidation Resistance ............... 21 Sulfidation Resistance ............. 22 REFERENCES ............................. 22 The material presented in this booklet has been prepared for the general information of the reader. It should not be used without first securing competent advice with respect to its suitability for any given application. While the material is believed to be technically correct, neither the Committee of Stainless Steel Pro- ducers nor the companies represented on the The Committee of Stainless Steel Producers acknowledges the help Committee warrant its suitability for any gen- by Gregory Kobrin, Senior Consultant, Materials Engineering, E.I. eral or particular use. DuPont de Nemours & Company in assembling data for this booklet. single-train plants came increasing demands on materials of construc- INTRODUCTION tion. The process for making am- monia is considered to be only Approximately 12 elements are es- moderately corrosive, so considera- sential to plant growth. Of these, nit- ble use is made of carbon and low- rogen is the main nutrient and is re- alloy steels for vessels and piping. quired in much larger amounts than However, numerous applications any other element. Ammonia is the have been found for the AISI 300 and principal source of fertilizer nitrogen, 400 Series stainless steels because and most of the ammonia production of their superior performance under a in the world is applied directly to the wide variety of process conditions, soil or used in the manufacture of not only for original fabrication but for urea and other important nitrogen- replacement equipment and piping as base fertilizers. (1)* Because of am- well. monia's importance to human needs, For example, stainless steels are it is considered to be one of the most used in valuable and most widely produced Catalytic steam reforming because chemicals in the world. of resistance to oxidation, carburi- The ammonia production industry zation and nitriding at elevated has grown by leaps and bounds since temperatures; 1964, with U.S. production in 1977 an estimated 17 million to 18 million short Carbon dioxide removal systems tons per year, about four tirnes that of where piping and vessels are sub- 1960 (4.8 million short tons). (2) jected to hot, aqueous solutions Up until 1963, plant capacities containing carbon dioxide at ranged between 50 and 400 short moderate to high velocities; tons per day, many using a multiplicity Ammonia synthesis for superior of parallel process systems, called performance in hot nitriding gases, multiple trains. In 1963, the first 600- resistance to hydrogen embrittle- short-tons-per-day single-train am- ment and hydrogen attack, and ex- monia plant came on stream. This cellent toughness at low tempera- represented the beginning of large- tures; capacity, single-train plants and was the first to use centrifugal compres- Centrifugal turbomachinery where sors driven by steam turbines to com- rotating and stationary components press synthesis gas to elevated pres- are subjected to erosion by high- sures. (2) velocity steam and corrosion by Between 1965 and 1970, many ammonium carbamate, CO and single-train ammonia plants with CO2; capacities of 600 to 1000 short tons Coolers and condensers for resis- per day were built throughout the tance to corrosion and fouling by world. In recent years, larger plants natural waters. have been commissioned, several with 1500 short tons per day capacity The purpose of this booklet is to and one of 1700 short tons per day, identify the many applications of ranked the largest in the world at pre- stainless steels in a typical process sent. (2) for manufacturing anhydrous am- With the advent of high-capacity monia. *Numbers in ( ) indicate reference. 4 Partial oxidation of heavy hydro- 1. Desulfurization of natural gas carbons (oils, distillates); 2. Catalytic steam reforming of PROCESS Cryogenic recovery from petroleum natural gas refinery gases or other cracking 3. Carbon monoxide shift DESCRIPTION operations; 4. Removal of carbon dioxide 5. Methanation Anhydrous ammonia is manufac- Gasification of coal or coke. 6. Synthesis of ammonia. tured by combining hydrogen and The first, third, fourth and fifth Currently, a high percentage of nitrogen in a molar ratio of 3:1, com- steps are designed to remove im- world ammonia production (an esti- pressing the gas and then cooling it purities such as sulfur, carbon mated 70 to 80%) uses hydrogen to about –27ºF (–33ºC). monoxide, carbon dioxide and water produced by catalytic steam reform- Nitrogen is obtained from air. Hy- from the feed, hydrogen and syn- ing operations, with natural gas drogen is produced from a feedstock thesis gas streams. In the second (methane) as the primary feedstock. by one of the following processes; step, hydrogen is manufactured and As a result, the following process de- nitrogen is introduced into the pro- scription is limited to ammonia pro- Catalytic steam reforming of natu- cess. The sixth step produces duction by catalytic steam reforming ral gas or naphtha; anhydrous ammonia from synthesis of natural gas, using six basic gas. All ammonia plants use this basic process, although process condltions such as temperatures, pressures and flow rates vary from plant to plant. Approximately 65 to 75% of the natural gas is used as feedstock for the primary reformer; and 25 to 35% is used as fuel for the reformer radiant section and for steam pro- duction. As natural gas reserves continue to dwindle, feedstocks based on heavier hydrocarbons and coal gasification processes (3) will undoubtedly be used increasingly in ammonia plants in years to come. A process flow schematic of a typi- cal ammonia plant which uses catalytic steam reforming of natural gas is shown in Figure 1. The six process steps are described in detail in the following sections. CORROSIVES FOUND IN MANY AMMONIA PROCESSES Sulfur– present in natural gas feedstock, it causes high- temperature sulfidation of metals, 5 and it combines with other ele- poisoning the nickel catalyst in the Applications for Stainless Steels ments to form aggressive com- primary reformer and depositing The system for removing sulfur from pounds, such as hydrogen sulfide, carbon on the catalyst. Sulfur can be the feedstock natural gas consists of sulfur dioxide, and carbonyl sulfide. present as hydrogen sulfide, mer- two pressure vessels, each containing captans, carbonyl sulfide and organic Chlorides–may be present, either by activated carbon for removal of sulfur compounds. Carbon beds are entrainment in natural gas, as mercaptan sulfur and hydrogen usually used when the sulfur content carryover from boiler feedwater, or sulfide. Each vessel is designed to is less than 10 grains/per standard in cooling waters. They may cause handle all the sulfur expected in the cubic foot (SCF), whereas hot iron localized attack of some stainless feed gas. As soon as the activated oxide or zinc oxide (4) beds are used steels. carbon in the first vessel becomes for gas with higher sulfur content. saturated with sulfur, the feed gas Carbon Dioxide–occurs in steam Most modern ammonia plants use stream is diverted to the second reforming of natural gas. It com- activated carbon for feedstock vessel to allow steam regeneration of bines with moisture to form car- desuIfurization. the carbon bed in the first vessel. bonic acid. Natural gas at several hundred For the most part, operation takes psig and ambient temperature is Ammonia–at high temperature has place above the dew point and carbon passed through the activated carbon high potential for nitriding metals. steel is a satisfactory material of con- bed. Sulfur compounds are absorbed At high pressure, corrosive am- struction for the vessels and related on the carbon or reacted
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toxicological Profile for Hydrogen Sulfide and Carbonyl Sulfide
    HYDROGEN SULFIDE AND CARBONYL SULFIDE 149 6. POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE 6.1 OVERVIEW Hydrogen sulfide has been found in at least 34 of the 1,832 waste sites that have been proposed for inclusion on the EPA National Priorities List (NPL) and carbonyl sulfide was detected in at least 4 of the 1,832 waste sites (ATSDR 2015). However, the number of sites evaluated for these substances is not known and hydrogen sulfide and carbonyl sulfide are ubiquitous in the atmosphere. The frequency of these sites can be seen in Figures 6-1 and 6-2. Carbonyl sulfide and hydrogen sulfide are principal components in the natural sulfur cycle. Bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes (a fungus-like bacteria) release hydrogen sulfide during the decomposition of 2- sulfur containing proteins and by the direct reduction of sulfate (SO4 ). Hydrogen sulfide is also emitted from volcanoes, stagnant or polluted waters, and manure or coal pits with low oxygen content (Aneja 1990; Khalil and Ramussen 1984). The majority of carbonyl sulfide that enters the environment is released to air and it is very abundant in the troposphere (Conrad and Meuser 2000; EPA 1994c, 1994d; Meinrat et al. 1992; Simmons et al. 2012; Stimler et al. 2010). It enters the atmosphere from both natural and anthropogenic sources (EPA 1994c, 1994d; Meinrat et al. 1992; Stimler et al. 2010). Carbonyl sulfide is released from wetlands, salt marshes, soil, oceans, deciduous and coniferous trees, and volcanic gases (Blake et al. 2004; EPA 1994c, 1994d; Meinrat et al. 1992; Rasmussen et al. 1982a, 1982b; Stimler et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Stainless Steels in Ammonia Production
    Stainless Steels in Ammonia Production Committee of Stainless Steel Producers American Iron and Steel Institute Washington, D.C. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................... 4 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ....... 5 CORROSIVES IN AMMONIA PROCESSES .......... 5 CONSIDERATIONS FOR SELECTING STAINLESS STEELS .................................... 6 Desulfurization of Natural Gas ................. 6 Catalytic Steam Reforming of Natural Gas ................. 6 Carbon Monoxide Shift ......... 8 Removal of Carbon Dioxide . 10 Methanation .......................... 11 Synthesis of Ammonia ......... 11 Turbine-Driven Centrifugal Compression Trains ........ 14 STAINLESS STEELS ................ 15 Metallurgical Structure ......... 16 High-Temperature Mechanical Properties ..... 16 Thermal Conductivity ........... 20 Oxidation Resistance ........... 21 Sulfidation Resistance .......... 22 REFERENCES .......................... 22 The material presented in this booklet has been prepared for the general information of the reader. It should not be used without first securing competent advice with respect to its suitability for any given application. While the material is believed to be technically correct, neither the Committee of Stainless Steel Pro- ducers nor the companies represented on the The Committee of Stainless Steel Producers acknowledges the help Committee warrant its suitability for any gen- by Gregory Kobrin, Senior Consultant, Materials Engineering, E.I. eral or particular use. DuPont de Nemours & Company in assembling data for this booklet. single-train plants came increasing demands on materials of construc- INTRODUCTION tion. The process for making am- monia is considered to be only Approximately 12 elements are es- moderately corrosive, so considera- sential to plant growth. Of these, nit- ble use is made of carbon and low- rogen is the main nutrient and is re- alloy steels for vessels and piping. quired in much larger amounts than However, numerous applications any other element.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Rising Natural Gas Prices on U.S. Ammonia Supply
    A Report from the Economic Research Service United States Department www.ers.usda.gov of Agriculture WRS-0702 August 2007 Impact of Rising Natural Gas Prices on U.S. Ammonia Supply Wen-yuan Huang Abstract The volatile and upward trend in U.S. natural gas prices from 2000-06 has led to a 17- percent decline in the Nation’s annual aggregate supply of ammonia. During the period, U.S. ammonia production declined 44 percent, while U.S. ammonia imports increased Contents 115 percent. Also, the share of U.S.-produced ammonia in the U.S. aggregate supply of ammonia dropped from 80 to 55 percent, while the share from imports increased from Introduction ........................1 15 percent to 42 percent. Meanwhile, ammonia prices paid by farmers increased from $227 per ton in 2000 to $521 per ton in 2006, an increase of 130 percent. Natural gas is Background ........................3 the main input used to produce ammonia. Additional increases in U.S. natural gas prices could lead to a further decline in domestic ammonia production and an even greater rise Impact of Natural Gas Prices on Ammonia in ammonia imports. Prices ................................5 Keywords: Natural gas and ammonia prices, ammonia supply, nitrogen fertilizers Effects of Natural Gas Prices on Ammonia Producers .........................6 Acknowledgments Effects of Rising Natural Gas Prices on Farmers .....................10 The author thanks the Fertilizer Institute, the International Center for Soil Fertility and Future Sources of Agricultural Development, and the National Gas Company of Trinidad and Tobago Ammonia Supply in Limited for providing data used in this study. The author also thanks the following indi- the United States ............12 viduals for their helpful suggestions: Stan Daberkow and Greg Pompelli of USDA’s Economic Research Service and James Duffield of USDA’s Office of Energy Policy Summary and Implications ......................15 and New Uses, and Harry Vroomen, the Fertilizer Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • SAFETY DATA SHEET Carbonyl Sulfide
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Carbonyl Sulfide Section 1. Identification GHS product identifier : Carbonyl Sulfide Chemical name : carbonyl sulphide Other means of : Carbon oxide sulfide; Carbonyl sulfide; Carbon oxide sulphide (carbonyl sulphide); identification Carbon oxide sulfide (COS); carbon oxysulfide Product use : Synthetic/Analytical chemistry. Synonym : Carbon oxide sulfide; Carbonyl sulfide; Carbon oxide sulphide (carbonyl sulphide); Carbon oxide sulfide (COS); carbon oxysulfide SDS # : 001012 Supplier's details : Airgas USA, LLC and its affiliates 259 North Radnor-Chester Road Suite 100 Radnor, PA 19087-5283 1-610-687-5253 24-hour telephone : 1-866-734-3438 Section 2. Hazards identification OSHA/HCS status : This material is considered hazardous by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). Classification of the : FLAMMABLE GASES - Category 1 substance or mixture GASES UNDER PRESSURE - Liquefied gas ACUTE TOXICITY (inhalation) - Category 3 GHS label elements Hazard pictograms : Signal word : Danger Hazard statements : Extremely flammable gas. May form explosive mixtures with air. Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated. May cause frostbite. Toxic if inhaled. Precautionary statements General : Read and follow all Safety Data Sheets (SDS’S) before use. Read label before use. Keep out of reach of children. If medical advice is needed, have product container or label at hand. Close valve after each use and when empty. Use equipment rated for cylinder pressure. Do not open valve until connected to equipment prepared for use. Use a back flow preventative device in the piping. Use only equipment of compatible materials of construction. Always keep container in upright position. Do not depend on odor to detect presence of gas.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbonyl Sulfide, Dimethyl Sulfide and Carbon Disulfide In
    Atmospheric Environment 44 (2010) 3805e3813 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Atmospheric Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/atmosenv Carbonyl sulfide, dimethyl sulfide and carbon disulfide in the Pearl River Delta of southern China: Impact of anthropogenic and biogenic sources H. Guo a,*, I.J. Simpson b, A.J. Ding c,T.Wanga, S.M. Saunders d, T.J. Wang c, H.R. Cheng a, B. Barletta b, S. Meinardi b, D.R. Blake b, F.S. Rowland b a Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong b Department of Chemistry, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, USA c School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, China d School of Biomedical, Biomolecular and Chemical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia article info abstract Article history: Reduced sulfur compounds (RSCs) such as carbonyl sulfide (OCS), dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and carbon Received 28 October 2009 disulfide (CS2) impact radiative forcing, ozone depletion, and acid rain. Although Asia is a large source of Received in revised form these compounds, until now a long-term study of their emission patterns has not been carried out. Here 19 June 2010 we analyze 16 months of RSC data measured at a polluted rural/coastal site in the greater Pearl River Accepted 22 June 2010 Delta (PRD) of southern China. A total of 188 canister air samples were collected from August 2001 to December 2002. The OCS and CS2 mixing ratios within these samples were higher in autumn/winter and Keywords: lower in summer due to the influence of Asian monsoon circulations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Haber Process
    Making ammonia - the Haber process Background During the last century, the populations of Europe and America rose very rapidly. More food and more crops were needed to feed more and more people. So farmers began to use nitrogen compounds as fertilisers. The main source of nitrogen compounds for fertilisers was sodium nitrate from Chile. By 1900 supplies of this were running out. Another supply of nitrogen had to be found or many people would starve. The obvious source of nitrogen was the air (about 78% of the air is nitrogen). Unfortunately, nitrogen is not very reactive. This made it difficult to convert it into ammonium salts and nitrates for use as fertilisers. A German chemist called Fritz Haber solved the problem. In 1904, Haber began studying the reaction between nitrogen and hydrogen. By 1908 he had found the conditions needed to make ammonia (NH3). Eventually, the Haber process became the most important method of manufacturing ammonia. 1. Why did farmers start to use nitrogen compounds as fertilisers? 2. What problem did farmers face in 1900? 3. How long did it take Fritz Haber to work out the conditions needed to make nitrogen and hydrogen react together? 4. What does the Haber process make? 5. Haber was an apprentice plumber before studying to become a chemist. How was Haber’s background useful to him as a chemist? The Haber process The raw materials for the Haber process are Natural gas, air and water. In the first stage, Natural gas (which is mostly methane) is reacted with steam to produce carbon dioxide and hydrogen.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind to Hydrogen to Ammonia Pilot Project
    Renewable Energy Storage and Utilization Using Hydrogen and Anhydrous Ammonia MN House Energy and Climate Committee August 27, 2020 Michael Reese, Director - Renewable Energy Dr. Prodromos Daoutidis, Professor UMN West Central Research and Outreach Center UMN Dept. of Chemical Engineering and Morris, MN Material Science Minneapolis, MN Renewable Ammonia for Energy Storage University of Minnesota is a global research leader in this field. NH3 UMM 1.65 MW 131 kW solar PV Wind Turbine and two 10 kW small wind turbines 1.65 MW Vestas V82 Wind Turbine H2 & NH3 Pilot Plant Existing Wind-to-Ammonia Pilot Plant at the UMN WCROC, Morris, MN G. Soloveichik, US Dept. of Energy, 2016 Slide 2 Benefits for using ammonia as regional-scale energy storage •Provides both distribution and transmission-scale energy storage, •Wide range of fuel uses (ICE genset, turbine, fuel cell, and thermal energy) •Seasonal storage capability, •Grid stabilization, •Readily dispatchable generation capacity (Peak load and peak fertilizer months are complementary. High N fertilizer demand is during utility shoulder seasons.), •Enables utilization of excess generation of wind, solar, and nuclear (low and negatively priced power within the Regional Transmission Organization / Independent System Operator), •Provides emergency backup outside of traditional energy sources •Flexibility between renewable and non-renewable generation (allows choice of carbon intensity of fuel between green and brown ammonia) •Significant levels of ammonia storage already in the Midwest (and usually
    [Show full text]
  • Process Intensification with Integrated Water-Gas-Shift Membrane Reactor Reactor Concept (Left)
    INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES PROGRAM Process Intensification with Integrated Water-Gas-Shift Membrane Reactor Reactor concept (left). Flow diagram (middle): Hydrogen (H2) permeates the membrane where nitrogen (N2) sweeps the gas to Hydrogen-Selective Membranes for High- produce a high-pressure H2/N2 gas stream. Membrane diagram Pressure Hydrogen Separation (right): The H2-selective membrane allows the continuous removal of the H2 produced in the water-gas-shift (WGS) reaction. This allows for the near-complete conversion of carbon monoxide (CO) This project will develop hydrogen-selective membranes for an innovative water-gas-shift reactor that improves gas separation to carbon dioxide (CO2) and for the separation of H2 from CO2. efficiency, enabling reduced energy use and greenhouse gas Image Courtesy of General Electric Company, Western Research Institute, emissions. and Idaho National Laboratory. Benefits for Our Industry and Our Nation Introduction The development of an integrated WGS-MR for hydrogen The goal of process intensification is to reduce the equipment purification and carbon capture will result in fuel flexibility footprint, energy consumption, and environmental impact of as well as environmental, energy, and economic benefits. manufacturing processes. Commercialization of this technology has the potential to achieve the following: One candidate for process intensification is gasification, a common method by which hydrocarbon feedstocks such as coal, • A reduction in energy use during the separation process by biomass, and organic waste are reacted with a controlled amount replacing a conventional WGS reactor and CO2 removal system of oxygen and steam to produce synthesis gas (syngas), which with a WGS-MR and downsized CO2 removal unit is composed primarily of hydrogen (H2) and carbon monoxide (CO).
    [Show full text]
  • Nitrogenase; Nitrogen Fixation Vs Haber-Bosch Process
    Nitrogenase; Nitrogen Fixation vs Haber-Bosch Process Anna Balinski, Jacob Watson Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 Abstract Comparison of Processes Haber-Bosch Process Overview:The Nitrogen Cycle is a chemical cycle which recycles nitrogen into usable forms, such as ammonium, nitrates, and nitrites. Nitrogen and nitrogen compounds are important Haber-Bosch Reaction because they make up our atmosphere as well as our earthly environments. Nitrogen can be recycled into ammonium naturally via nitrogen fixing bacteria, or synthetically using the + - Discovered by Fritz Haber, process scaled up by Haber-Bosch process. Nitrogen fixation in bacteria follows the reaction N2 + 8 H + 8 e 2 • Carl Bosch NH3 + H2 and is powered by the hydrolysis of 16 ATP equivalents. The Haber-Bosch process Response to Germany’s need for ammonia for follows the reaction scheme of N2 + 3 H2 2 NH3 and is powered by using high pressures, • temperatures, and catalysts. Using the Haber-Bosch process an optimum yield of 97% explosive during WWI ammonium can be obtained. These reactions both use diatomic nitrogen as well as Nitrogen Fixation Reaction • Prolonged WWI when Germany was able to hydrogen, but differ in their final products as bacterial nitrogen fixation releases hydrogen produce fertilizer and explosives gas as a byproduct. Bacteria in the soil use nitrogen to create energy to grow and reproduce Fritz Haber Carl Bosch as well as to introduce nitrogen for use by other species. The Haber-Bosch process produces ammonium which can be used for a range of activities such as the production of fertilizers, or even explosives.
    [Show full text]
  • Provisional Peer-Reviewed Toxicity Values for Carbonyl Sulfide (Carbon Oxide Sulfide; Casrn 463 58 1)
    EPA/690/R-15/002F l Final 9-29-2015 Provisional Peer-Reviewed Toxicity Values for Carbonyl Sulfide (Carbon Oxide Sulfide) (CASRN 463-58-1) Superfund Health Risk Technical Support Center National Center for Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, OH 45268 AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS, AND REVIEWERS CHEMICAL MANAGER John C. Lipscomb, PhD, DABT, Fellow ATS National Center for Environmental Assessment, Cincinnati, OH DRAFT DOCUMENT PREPARED BY SRC, Inc. 7502 Round Pond Road North Syracuse, NY 13212 PRIMARY INTERNAL REVIEWERS Jeff Swartout National Center for Environmental Assessment, Cincinnati, OH This document was externally peer reviewed under contract to Eastern Research Group, Inc. 110 Hartwell Avenue Lexington, MA 02421-3136 Questions regarding the contents of this document may be directed to the U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development’s National Center for Environmental Assessment, Superfund Health Risk Technical Support Center (513-569-7300). ii Carbonyl Sulfide TABLE OF CONTENTS COMMONLY USED ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .................................................. iv BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................1 DISCLAIMERS ...............................................................................................................................1 QUESTIONS REGARDING PPRTVs ............................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • ILLINOIS CLEAN COAL INSTITUTE Final Report
    FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2010 Project Title: INTEGRATED MULTI-CONTAMINANT REMOVAL PROCESS FOR SYNGAS CLEANUP-PHASE 3 ICCI Project Number: 10/2A-1 Principal Investigator: Dr. Shaojun (James) Zhou, Gas Technology Institute Other Investigators: Dr. Ajay Makkuni, Dr. Arun Basu; Gas Technology Institute Dr. Scott Lynn, University of California (Consultant) Project Manager: Dr. Debalina Dasgupta, ICCI ABSTRACT The overall objective of this project was to undertake the development of an integrated multi-contaminant removal process in which hydrogen sulfide (H2S), carbonyl sulfide (COS), ammonia (NH3), chlorides and heavy metals, including mercury, arsenic, selenium and cadmium, present in the coal-derived syngas can be removed in a single process. To accomplish this, a novel process called UCSRP-HP (University of California Sulfur Recovery Process-High-Pressure) that directly converts H2S into elemental sulfur at 285 to 300 °F and at any given sour gas pressure, and removes the various contaminants was adopted. During this research, data critical to developing and evaluating UCSRP-HP technology for multi-contaminant removal from syngas derived from Illinois #6 coal was obtained. Aspen Plus simulations were performed that indicate complete removal of ammonia (NH3), hydrogen chloride (HCl) and hydrogen selenide (H2Se) in the aqueous scrub step of the UCSRP-HP process. Thermodynamic considerations point to minimal formation of COS in the UCSRP-HP reactor for a CO2-rich-feed as compared to a CO-rich-feed gas stream. An economic evaluation was performed that integrated the UCSRP-HP into a nominal 550 MWe Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) facility gasifying Illinois coal.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction of Several Toxic Heterocarbonyl Gases with Polypyrrole As a Potential Gas Sensor
    chemosensors Article Interaction of Several Toxic Heterocarbonyl Gases with Polypyrrole as a Potential Gas Sensor Francisco C. Franco Jr. Chemistry Department, De La Salle University, 2401 Taft Avenue, Manila 0922, Philippines; [email protected]; Tel.: +63-2-85360230 Received: 4 August 2020; Accepted: 10 September 2020; Published: 14 September 2020 Abstract: The interactions of the toxic heterocarbonyl gases phosgene, carbonyl fluoride, formaldehyde, carbonyl sulfide, and acetone with polypyrrole as a toxic heterocarbonyl gas sensor, were extensively studied by density functional theory (DFT). The Becke 3-parameter, Lee-Yang-Parr (B3LYP) exchange-correlation functional methods were first tested against several high-level DFT methods employing the Dunning’s double-ζ and triple-ζ basis sets and were found to be sufficient in describing the non-covalent interactions involved in this study. The interaction of pyrrole with the heterocarbonyl gases resulted in changes in the structure and optoelectronic properties of the polymer and it was observed that acetone and formaldehyde had the strongest H-bonding interaction with polypyrrole, while the interaction of phosgene and formaldehyde resulted in the lowest energy gap and may result in its high sensitivity towards these gases. The UV-Vis absorption revealed significant red-shifted first singlet excited states (Eexcited, 1st) of the complexes and follows the same trend as the EGap values. It is shown that the Eexcited, 1st was due to the π(HOMO ) π*(LUMO ) transitions and the excited state at maximum absorption (E ) Py −! HC excited, max was due to the π(HOMO ) π*(LUMO ) transitions. This study demonstrates the potential Py −! Py sensitivity and selectivity of polypyrrole as a toxic heterocarbonyl sensor.
    [Show full text]