DOCSLIB.ORG

St. Lawrence River Watershed Characterization Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
St. Lawrence River Watershed Characterization Report FINAL January 2020 St. Lawrence River Watershed Characterization Report Prepared for Franklin County Soil & Water Conservation District This plan was prepared with funding provided by the New York State Department of State under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. FINAL January 2020 St. Lawrence River Watershed Characterization Report Prepared for Prepared by Franklin County Soil & Water Conservation District EcoLogic, LLC 151 Finney Blvd. 9 Albany St. Suite 3J Malone NY 12953 Cazenovia NY 13035 FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 9 2 Overview of the Watershed................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Evolution and Current Configuration of the Basin .............................................................................. 10 2.2 Subwatersheds .................................................................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Settlement and Development in the Watershed ................................................................................. 18 2.4 Existing Plans and Initiatives Related to Water Resources in the Study Area .......................... 20 3 Environmental Setting ........................................................................................................... 23 3.1 Water Resources ............................................................................................................................................... 23 3.1.1 Surface Water ..................................................................................................................................... 23 3.1.2 Groundwater ...................................................................................................................................... 24 3.1.3 Wetlands .............................................................................................................................................. 25 3.1.4 Precipitation Patterns and Flooding .......................................................................................... 25 3.2 Topography and Geology ............................................................................................................................. 29 3.3 Soils........................................................................................................................................................................ 29 3.4 Habitat .................................................................................................................................................................. 30 3.4.1 Ecological Zones ............................................................................................................................... 31 3.4.2 Significant Habitats and Protected Areas ............................................................................... 33 3.5 Land Cover .......................................................................................................................................................... 34 4 Community Characteristics .................................................................................................. 38 4.1 Municipalities and Population ..................................................................................................................... 38 4.2 Regulatory and Programmatic Environment ......................................................................................... 41 4.2.1 Approach to Reviewing Local Laws, Plans, and Programs ................................................ 41 4.2.2 Gap Assessment as Related to the Desired State ................................................................ 42 4.3 Water Use ............................................................................................................................................................ 43 4.3.1 Water Withdrawals ........................................................................................................................... 43 4.3.2 Drinking Water Sources ................................................................................................................. 44 4.3.3 Commercial Shipping – The St. Lawrence Seaway .............................................................. 48 4.4 Public Access and Recreation ...................................................................................................................... 49 4.5 Protected Lands ................................................................................................................................................ 50 4.6 Infrastructure ...................................................................................................................................................... 50 4.6.1 Dams ...................................................................................................................................................... 50 4.6.2 Roads, Highways, and Railways .................................................................................................. 52 St. Lawrence River Watershed Characterization Report 3 January 2020 FINAL 4.7 Industries and Employment ......................................................................................................................... 53 5 Existing Water Quality Conditions ..................................................................................... 55 5.1 Waterbody Inventory and Priority Waterbodies .................................................................................. 55 5.2 Section 303(d) List ............................................................................................................................................ 58 6 Waterbody Impairments and Potential Sources of Pollution ..................................... 62 6.1 Impairments to Designated Best Use ....................................................................................................... 62 6.1.1 Fish Consumption Advisories ...................................................................................................... 64 6.2 Impacts and Stressors Preventing Waterbodies from Meeting Their Designated Uses ....... 64 6.2.1 Mercury ................................................................................................................................................ 65 6.2.2 Contaminated Sediment ................................................................................................................ 65 6.2.3 Acidic Waters ..................................................................................................................................... 65 6.2.4 Invasive Species ................................................................................................................................. 66 6.2.5 Nutrients .............................................................................................................................................. 69 6.2.6 Excessive Plant and Algal Growth .............................................................................................. 70 6.2.7 Sedimentation.................................................................................................................................... 70 6.2.8 Salt .......................................................................................................................................................... 71 6.2.9 Pathogens ............................................................................................................................................ 72 6.3 Potential Sources of Stressors ..................................................................................................................... 72 6.3.1 Regional Nonpoint Sources ......................................................................................................... 73 6.3.2 Local Nonpoint Sources ................................................................................................................. 75 6.3.3 Point Sources ..................................................................................................................................... 81 6.4 Sensitive Areas .................................................................................................................................................. 97 7 Emerging Issues ...................................................................................................................... 98 7.1 Climate Change ................................................................................................................................................. 98 7.2 Floodplain and Water-Level Management ............................................................................................. 99 7.3 Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs) ........................................................................................ 103 8 Data Gaps ................................................................................................................................. 104 9 References ............................................................................................................................... 105 TABLES Table 1 Hydrologic Units and Area within the St. Lawrence River Watershed .............................. 12 Table 2 Climate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Quarterly
    The Quarterly OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ST. LAWRENCE COUNTY HISTORICAL,ASSOCIATION October 1970 Page Two The Quarterly Official Publication of The St. Lawrence County Historical Assn. ASSOCIATION OFFICERS CONTENTS OCTOBER 1970 VOL. 15 NO. 4 President EDWARD J. BLANKMAN Page Cantor. First Vice President VARICK CHITTENDEN Sights and Sounds Hopkinton THE STIR OF NATURE by Wm. N.Carr Second Vice President HOWARD K. SMITH Potsdam Beloved "Institution" Treasurer DR. GRANT C. MADILL by Valeric Pikr DONALD A. BLOUNT Canton A c.ri.ctant Trewrer Poet of ltie Adirontlacks EDITH L COSIA Canton HELEN HINSDALE RICH by Georg~J. hioffat 8 Corresponding Secretary MARIANNE SAVINC Heuvel ton RAYMONDVILLE SCHOOL by Susan C. Lymari 8 Financral Secretary MRS. W. B. FLEE'IXAM F. & A. M. DelBeys!er FREEMASONRY IN Richville Building MRS. JOSEPH WRANESH ST. LAWRENCE COUN'I'Y by Clarence Anltstrong g Richville f'romotio~r EUGENE HATCH BEHOLD, THE STONE! by Lillia?~Adams 11-15 Russell Sprcral Gifts MRS. EDWARD BIONDI POETIC PORTRAITS 16-17 Canton Historic Sites and .lluseums 1-ALVHENCE (;. BOVARD SEED WREATH (Picture) I9 Okdmsburg ,Vo~ttr~tatrons EUtf'AIiD F. HEIM PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE 20 ('antun )'orbt.r Clubs MRS. JOSEPH WRANESI SUMMER TOURS 20 Hrrhville Fairs 2 I MAXINE RUTHERFORD LETTER FROM THE EDITOR Harnm~~nd .\ft'>11~~t3rs/rib RESEARCHERS 23 THE QL'AK'I'ERLY .\IARY H HIONDI Edltor MARGARET GI-EASON Assistant Editor ADC'ISOK}v BOARD Eugene Halch Russell Dr. Paul F. Jamieson C'nnton llarold Storie Couverneur THE QUARTERLY is published in January, April, July and October each year by the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Penobscot Rivershed with Licensed Dischargers and Critical Salmon
    0# North West Branch St John T11 R15 WELS T11 R17 WELS T11 R16 WELS T11 R14 WELS T11 R13 WELS T11 R12 WELS T11 R11 WELS T11 R10 WELS T11 R9 WELS T11 R8 WELS Aroostook River Oxbow Smith Farm DamXW St John River T11 R7 WELS Garfield Plt T11 R4 WELS Chapman Ashland Machias River Stream Carry Brook Chemquasabamticook Stream Squa Pan Stream XW Daaquam River XW Whitney Bk Dam Mars Hill Squa Pan Dam Burntland Stream DamXW Westfield Prestile Stream Presque Isle Stream FRESH WAY, INC Allagash River South Branch Machias River Big Ten Twp T10 R16 WELS T10 R15 WELS T10 R14 WELS T10 R13 WELS T10 R12 WELS T10 R11 WELS T10 R10 WELS T10 R9 WELS T10 R8 WELS 0# MARS HILL UTILITY DISTRICT T10 R3 WELS Water District Resevoir Dam T10 R7 WELS T10 R6 WELS Masardis Squapan Twp XW Mars Hill DamXW Mule Brook Penobscot RiverYosungs Lakeh DamXWed0# Southwest Branch St John Blackwater River West Branch Presque Isle Strea Allagash River North Branch Blackwater River East Branch Presque Isle Strea Blaine Churchill Lake DamXW Southwest Branch St John E Twp XW Robinson Dam Prestile Stream S Otter Brook L Saint Croix Stream Cox Patent E with Licensed Dischargers and W Snare Brook T9 R8 WELS 8 T9 R17 WELS T9 R16 WELS T9 R15 WELS T9 R14 WELS 1 T9 R12 WELS T9 R11 WELS T9 R10 WELS T9 R9 WELS Mooseleuk Stream Oxbow Plt R T9 R13 WELS Houlton Brook T9 R7 WELS Aroostook River T9 R4 WELS T9 R3 WELS 9 Chandler Stream Bridgewater T T9 R5 WELS TD R2 WELS Baker Branch Critical UmScolcus Stream lmon Habitat Overlay South Branch Russell Brook Aikens Brook West Branch Umcolcus Steam LaPomkeag Stream West Branch Umcolcus Stream Tie Camp Brook Soper Brook Beaver Brook Munsungan Stream S L T8 R18 WELS T8 R17 WELS T8 R16 WELS T8 R15 WELS T8 R14 WELS Eagle Lake Twp T8 R10 WELS East Branch Howe Brook E Soper Mountain Twp T8 R11 WELS T8 R9 WELS T8 R8 WELS Bloody Brook Saint Croix Stream North Branch Meduxnekeag River W 9 Turner Brook Allagash Stream Millinocket Stream T8 R7 WELS T8 R6 WELS T8 R5 WELS Saint Croix Twp T8 R3 WELS 1 Monticello R Desolation Brook 8 St Francis Brook TC R2 WELS MONTICELLO HOUSING CORP.
    [Show full text]
  • DEERFIELD RIVER WATERSHED Assessment Report
    DEERFIELD RIVER WATERSHED Assessment Report 2004-2008 Downstream of Fife Brook Dam The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs 251 Causeway Street, Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114-2119 Mitt Romney GOVERNOR Kerry Healey LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR Tel: (617) 626-1000 Fax: (617) 626-1181 Ellen Roy Herzfelder or (617) 626-1180 SECRETARY http://www.state.ma.us/envir November 19, 2004 Dear Friends of the Deerfield River Watershed: It is with great pleasure that I present you with the Assessment Report for the Deerfield River Watershed. The report helped formulate the 5-year watershed action plan that will guide local and state environmental efforts within the Deerfield River Watershed over the next five years. The report expresses some of the overall goals of the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, such as improving water quality, restoring natural flows to rivers, protecting and restoring biodiversity and habitats, improving public access and balanced resource use, improving local capacity, and promoting a shared responsibility for watershed protection and management. The Deerfield River Watershed Assessment Report was developed with input from the Deerfield River Watershed Team and multiple stakeholders including watershed groups, state and federal agencies, Regional Planning Agencies and, of course, the general public from across the Watershed. We appreciate the opportunity to engage such a wide group of expertise and experience as it allows the state to focus on the issues and challenges that might otherwise not be easily characterized. From your input we have identified the following priority issues: • Water Quantity • Water Quality • Fish Communities • Wildlife and Terrestrial Habitat • Open Space • Recreation I commend everyone involved in this endeavor.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Boxes ACCESS: Open to Research ACQUISITION: PROCESSED BY: Margie Amodeo
    Constitutional Council for the Forest Preserve UC0055 1 of 1 Constitutional Council for the Forest Preserve 1966-1976 UC0055 QUANTITY: 2 boxes ACCESS: Open to research ACQUISITION: PROCESSED BY: Margie Amodeo Biographical Note: The Constitutional Council for the Forest Preserve formed in January 1966 as a coalition to be prepared challenges to Article XIV at the New York State Constitutional Convention. It was designed to serve as a liaison at the time of the Convention and in May 1968 elected to continue serving to alert organizations state-wide to a variety of concerns that related to the problems of the Forest Preserve. When the coalition was founded, officers from over fifty organizations joined along with the individual memberships were issued. Proposed changes to the constitution were bundled and voted on as a whole and rejected by every New York county. The CCFP continued to function as a group seeking to maintain Forest Preserve protection within the state constitution. As of January 1971, the Council consisted of 138 members. The officers included David Newhouse (who would also become an advisor to the TSCFA), David Sive, Arthur M. Crocker, R. Watson Pomeroy and William K. Verner. The consortium was dissolved in 1976 because as David Newhouse, CCFP Chairman, writes, “its function is now fulfilled by other organizations such as EPL and The Adirondack Council.” Any remaining funds were transferred to the Adirondack Council. Scope and Content Note: This Collection includes evidence of not only the internal discussion informing the opinions and decisions of this group of environmentalist leaders but letters and statements from members to political leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Americans Ol'
    Native Americans ol' Clarendon, Vermont *This is only a report of my early findings. This is subject to charge as new evidence and facts arise. I\rly research has led me to cliscover two groups of Native Americiurs that could have resided in Clarendon and one other that may have simply passed through time to time. The tribe of Native l[mericans that has the highest likelihood of being in Clarendon isi the Mahican, specifically the subdivision Mahican proper. Their territory extended from Poughkeepsie, New York to Deerfield, I\4assachusetts, and extended flrttrest north in Rutland. It is important to mention that tlhey are not to be mistaken with the Mohegan tribes of Connecticut; however, they do have lineage witkr one another. As a side note, the Mahicans have lineage with the Lenape and ['equot. Other names for the Mahicans is as follows: Akochakanen (koquois name that means "Those who,speak a strangertongue"), Canoe Indians (Given by colonists), Hikanagi/Nhilcana (Given by the Shawnee), Laups (Given by the French), Orunges (,Given by a school textbook author, Chauvignerie, who rvas referring to a specific Mahican tribe in 1736), River Indians (Given by the Dutch), and Uragees (Again given by an author, Colden, in reference to a specific tribe of the.Mahicans 1747). Mahicans were hunters of southwestem and western Vermont. lheir langrllge belonged to the linguistic family of the Algonquian, spoken with an r-dialect. Sieldom did they settle anywhere in Vermont to stay due to the fact that they were typically hLunters, hotvever, it is not irnprobable that they had permanent selllements in Clarendon.r Historic territory of the |tdahicans l Swanton, John R., The lndion Tribes of North America,1953 pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Adapted from the Senior Year Thesis of Roselyne Laboso
    Loading of elements and anions to the St. Lawrence River from tributaries in St. Lawrence County, New York Report‡ June 25, 2014 ‡Adapted from the Senior Year Thesis of Roselyne Laboso TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 2 2. GEOLOGIC SETTING .............................................................................................................................. 9 3. METHODS .............................................................................................................................................. 11 3.1 Instrument calibration .................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Sampling Collection ......................................................................................................................... 11 3.3 Instrument and chromatographic conditions ................................................................................. 12 3.4 Standard preparation for Ion Chromatography .............................................................................. 12 3.5 Acid Neutralizing Capacity and Alkalinity ........................................................................................ 12 3.6 Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP‐MS) analysis .............................................. 14 3.7 Quality Assurance analysis ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Partnership to Examine the Condition of Regional Lakes and Their Influence on Tributaries of the St
    Partnership to Examine the Condition of Regional Lakes and their Influence on Tributaries of the St. Lawrence River Brad Baldwin St. Lawrence University Introduction The lakes of northern New York (NNY) support abundant and diverse wildlife communities as well as a variety of valuable human uses. Given the relatively remote and undisturbed condition of our region, these water bodies are attractive and appear to be healthy and thriving. However, certain of these regional ecosystems are showing signs of human impact and degradation and need to be carefully managed. For example, the US Environmental Protection Agency found that over 60% of nearly 350 lakes across 8 New England states (including NY) showed one to several types of ecosystem stress (Whittier et al. 2002). Two of the most familiar forms of disturbance are lake acidification and cultural eutrophication. Many lakes in our Adirondack region are acidified while eutrophication is common in lowland lakes situated in drainage basins with high levels of agriculture (Whittier et al. 2002, Carpenter et al. 2007). Shoreline development can also cause eutrophication (Whittier et al. 2002, Moore et al. 2003) and, along with clearance of natural riparian vegetation, lake fish communities have become degraded (Whittier et al. 2002, Carpenter et al. 2007). More recent work also stresses the impacts of atmospheric mercury deposition and exotic species invasions. Mercury is biomagnifying in many lake food webs and causing certain sport fish to become so toxic that humans need to limit their consumption of these fish (Whittier et al. 2002, Evers et al. 2007). Also, as humans move between lakes we spread non-native species (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Anne's Article About Life on the St. Lawrence River
    RIVER RECOLLECTIONS: Portraits of Life along the St. Lawrence River in the 20th Century Ann M. Gefell Author's Note: In 1983 I began to words of the people themselves. mighty St. Lawrence, its beautiful talk with people who lived along the St. Those who tell that history include natural environment and rich history, Lawrence River and had experienced farmers, sturgeon fishermen, Mohawk and draws attention to its increasing the economic, social, and ecological elders, a river boat captain, shop- fragility. changes resulting from the building of keepers,farm wives, former and present Special thanks go to the following the Seaway. Library shelves are filled municipal representatives, town members of the Mohawk community at with booksabout the engineering of the historians, dwellers of islands and Akwesasne: Ernie Benedict, Ron St. Lawrence Seaway, but except for small towns that were flooded-people LaFrance, Jake Swamp, Angus "Shine' booksabout early exploration, shipping who knew a different way of life upon George, Loran Thompson, Sally Bene- and navigation, little has been written the St. Lawrence. They discuss their dict, Douglas George, Peter Blue about the peoples' relationship to the lives since then and what they feel Cloud, Barbara Barnes, Tony Barnes, river. My purpose was to learn about about the future of the St. Lawrence. and Barry Montour and to the memory this relationship by listening to the "River Recollections" celebrates the of Ira Benedict. Harry MacDonald fishing off Longue Sault Island, c. 1933. Warners's Island in background. Plwto courtesy of Mae MacDonald 4 Northeast Indian Quarterly Fall1988 Aerial view of Longue Sault Rapids, pre-Seaway.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Freshwater Fishing Regulations Guide: 2015-16
    NEW YORK Freshwater FISHING2015–16 OFFICIAL REGULATIONS GUIDE VOLUME 7, ISSUE NO. 1, APRIL 2015 Fishing for Muskie www.dec.ny.gov Most regulations are in effect April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR New York: A State of Angling Opportunity When it comes to freshwater fishing, no state in the nation can compare to New York. Our Great Lakes consistently deliver outstanding fishing for salmon and steelhead and it doesn’t stop there. In fact, New York is home to four of the Bassmaster’s top 50 bass lakes, drawing anglers from around the globe to come and experience great smallmouth and largemouth bass fishing. The crystal clear lakes and streams of the Adirondack and Catskill parks make New York home to the very best fly fishing east of the Rockies. Add abundant walleye, panfish, trout and trophy muskellunge and northern pike to the mix, and New York is clearly a state of angling opportunity. Fishing is a wonderful way to reconnect with the outdoors. Here in New York, we are working hard to make the sport more accessible and affordable to all. Over the past five years, we have invested more than $6 million, renovating existing boat launches and developing new ones across the state. This is in addition to the 50 new projects begun in 2014 that will make it easier for all outdoors enthusiasts to access the woods and waters of New York. Our 12 DEC fish hatcheries produce 900,000 pounds of fish each year to increase fish populations and expand and improve angling opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • MCA Extends Appreciation to First Responders
    Volume 5 Issue 2 SPECIAL EDITION ISSUE Enniska / February 2015 MCA Extends Appreciation to First Responders n light of recent com- Imunity tragedies, the Mohawk Council of Ak- wesasne would like to ex- tend its sincere apprecia- and community members tion to all first responders assistance for days on who selflessly gave their inend a searchunder foroppressive missing snowmobilersweather conditions, and laterfirst commitment, dedica- to battle a house fire. The was and is displayed by tion, and selflessness that women is honorable and instrumentalfirst responding to ourmen com and- Niawenko:wa to the Ho- gansburg-Akwesasnemunity. Vol- First responders serve an important role in the community. MCA is proud to have many members of the Hogansburg-Akwesasne Volunteer Fire Department on staff, along with police officers and ambulance personnel (EMTs). These employee were honored unteer Fire Department at an MCA Spirit Awards Ceremony in their honor last year. (Photo) also led the search effort who battled the fire and of the community who offered their assis- to the assisting agencies, including the Fort tance Thank by you joining as well the to search the countless on their members personal for the snowmobilers. Also niawenko:wa snowmobiles, cook- - ing food for the large Covington Fire and EMS, Bombay Fire and search party, or assist- EMS, Franklin County Dispatch and Emer ing during either trag- Table of Contents gency Services Office, Franklin County Car 2 Special Edition Introduction from the Grand Chief...................... Page 3 and 14, St. Regis Mohawk Police, Parishville You are all appreciat- Temporary Toll Plaza Detour and Ambulance Route...................
    [Show full text]
  • WSP Report 2012
    Watershed Stewardship Program Summary of Programs and Research 2012 Watershed Stewardship Program Report # AWI 2013-01 Executive Summary and Introduction 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary and Introduction........................................................................................................... 4 West-Central Adirondack Region Summary ............................................................................................... 17 Staff Profiles ................................................................................................................................................ 22 Chateaugay Lake Boat Launch Use Report ................................................................................................. 29 Cranberry Lake Boat Launch Use Study ...................................................................................................... 36 Fourth Lake Boat Launch Use Report ......................................................................................................... 45 Lake Flower and Second Pond Boat Launch Use Study .............................................................................. 58 Lake Placid State and Village Boat Launch Use Study ................................................................................. 72 Long Lake Boat Launch Use Study .............................................................................................................. 84 Meacham Lake Campground Boat Launch Use Study ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Vermont Management Plan for Brook, Brown and Rainbow Trout Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department January 2018
    The Vermont Management Plan for Brook, Brown and Rainbow Trout Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department January 2018 Prepared by: Rich Kirn, Fisheries Program Manager Reviewed by: Brian Chipman, Will Eldridge, Jud Kratzer, Bret Ladago, Chet MacKenzie, Adam Miller, Pete McHugh, Lee Simard, Monty Walker, Lael Will ACKNOWLEDGMENT: This project was made possible by fishing license sales and matching Dingell- Johnson/Wallop-Breaux funds available through the Federal Sportfish Restoration Act. Table of Contents I. Introduction ......................................................................................... 1 II. Life History and Ecology ................................................................... 2 III. Management History ......................................................................... 7 IV. Status of Existing Fisheries ............................................................. 13 V. Management of Trout Habitat .......................................................... 17 VI. Management of Wild Trout............................................................. 34 VII. Management of Cultured Trout ..................................................... 37 VIII. Management of Angler Harvest ................................................... 66 IX. Trout Management Plan Goals, Objectives and Strategies .............. 82 X. Summary of Laws and Regulations .................................................. 87 XI. Literature Cited ............................................................................... 92 I. Introduction
    [Show full text]