EXTENSIONS of REMARKS 19921 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS HEALTH-CARE INDUSTRY TAKES Mr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EXTENSIONS of REMARKS 19921 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS HEALTH-CARE INDUSTRY TAKES Mr July 22, 1985 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 19921 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS HEALTH-CARE INDUSTRY TAKES Mr. Speaker, as one who is very fond At the Pru, MacNaughton is credited for THE SPOTLIGHT of the entire Rodino family, it is a much of the early progress of PruCare, a great pleasure for me to insert this ar­ subsidiary that runs a network of HMO's and units in the far-flung health care HON. ROBERT G. TORRICEW ticle into the RECORD to share with my system of the company. Headquartered in OF NEW JERSEY colleagues. Roseland, PruCare's chief executive is Sam IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HEALTH-CARE INDUSTRY TAKES THE SPOTLIGHT Havens who at 38 four years ago became its <By John Soloway) president. Monday, July 22, 1985 Once again, the business spotlight is on Sam Havens, asked recently by a Wash­ e Mr. TORRICELLI. Mr. Speaker, an the Garden State, in still another dimen­ ington correspondence for comment on the article appeared in last Sunday's sion. invasion of hospital chains into the under­ Newark Star-Ledger entitled "Health­ Its focus now is on the multibillion dollar, writing of health insurance, asserted. Care Industry Takes The Spotlight," multifaceted health-care industry which is "The hospital chains are moving the di­ about some of the exciting changes going through a performance involving rection they have to move, to protect their and developments that have occurred major metamorphosis and keen competi­ base and fill their beds," which largely ex­ tion. plains the most recent development in the in the health care industry in New And prominent Jerseyans, past and broadening battle in the health-care busi­ Jersey. present, are center stage. Also in the scene ness. Prominently featured in this article of action are such giant corporate entities as What's behind the rush to get aboard is a young New Jersey attorney named Prudential Insurance Co. of America and "The New Health Care" bandwagon? the Hospital Corp. of America and such or­ Peter W. Rodino III-the son of our It's the concern, "the rapidly growing con­ distinguished colleague Representative ganizations as the nationwide Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association and its New cern" among businesses-large and small en­ PETER w. RODINO, JR., the chairman of Jersey unit; the American Hospital Associa­ terprises alike-that health-care costs are the House Judiciary Committee and tion, and scampering about are a host of "going into outer space," to use the quote the dean of the New Jersey Congres­ Health Maintenance Organizations, attributed to one corporate employee bene­ sional delegation. <HMOs), no fewer than 11 of Jersey origin. fits executive. It is clear from reading this article "New Jersey is the hotbed of HMOs," says Explains New Jersey Business & Industry that the younger Rodino has a great Peter W. Rodino, 3d, visibly pleased after Association's director of regulatory affairs, many of the qualities for which we all wrapping up a deal that places Crossroads Jeff Stoller: "Health-care costs may well be know his father-intelligence, hard Health Plan of New Jersey under the wings the No. 1 concern of New Jersey employers of the broad-scoped Ameri-Care Health by year's end, ahead of concerns over tax work, integrity, and dedication. Those Corp. and himself in an enviable and chal­ costs." Three years ago, recalls Stoller, the of us who know and have worked with lenging role in the industry. concern over health-care costs as deter­ both Rodinos will not be surprised to In the latest HMO consolidation involving mined by NJBIA's annual economic survey, learn that Peter Rodino III is earning a Jersey health insurer, the 33-year-old ranked in 16th place. tremendous success and respect. Roseland attorney-son of New Jersey's Moreover, NJBIA's seminars last month in When he was a young boy, Peter congressional delegation dean, Peter W. Woodbridge and Piscataway directed by Rodino recognized the dangers of nu­ Rodino, Jr.-will continue as chairman of Stoller played to standing room only, indi­ clear war, and although he was only 10 the Crossroads subsidiary and take on a di­ cating the wide apprehension over rising years old, he decided to do something rector's portfolio on the board of the pub­ business costs attributable to health-care abut it. After he wrote a letter to licy-owned AmeriCare. benefits. A former Jerseyan, George Deubel is The merger action in which Peter Rodino Nikita Krushchev, imploring him to president and chief executive of AmeriCare, put an end to the arms race, young 3d played a newsworthy role last week, had headquartered in Sacramento, Calif. Of earlier seen HMO of New Jersey, a burgeon­ Peter started a program called "Little Deubel, Rodino says he is "a management ing health care coverer, win approval to People To Little People," a letter-writ­ pro among the best in the health care indus­ expand its scope across additional key coun­ ing campaign to the children of the try," a credential of vital importance in any ties in the northern part of the state in Soviet Union. changing business. search of new subscribers. Its parent firm is He earned a great deal of attention In another area of the revolution-yes U.S. Health Care Systems Inc., a big factor for this. He received an invitation to "revolution" is the term the Blue Cross/ in the national competition. the White House and met with Presi­ Blue Shield people employ to characterize Now, HMO/NJ and Crossroads will be dent Johnson, appeared on the popu­ the scenario-there is a very visible former squaring off in the contest for New Jersey Jersey corporate chieftain of Newark-based supremacy. lar television quiz show "I've Got A Prudential Insurance Co., Donald Mac­ Secret," and was commended by Naughton, who on this very day marks his The general battle among the health in­ UNICO as "Boy of the Year" and by 68th birthday anniversary and stays in the surers-HMOs, PPOs, DRGs, the hospital the Columbian Civic Club as "Out­ fray for the hand of the nation's leading chains, PruCare, et al., is what prompted standing Youth of the Year." This all producer of health care products, the Amer­ Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association into ican Hospital Supply Corp., in a deal figured advertising action with the "revolution" took place before he reached his 12th characterization in what's what in the orga­ birthday. at $7 .6 billion. Don MacNaughton is board chairman of nization's ad series, "The New Health Care." This early promise was realized in Hospital Corp. of America, a position he at­ Fifty-five years ago, Blue Cross/Blue Shield his later professional and academic tained upon leaving Pru in 1978 when, in his wrote the book on the health insurance con­ achievements. After graduating from own words, he decided to exit the "pressure­ cept and the New Jersey operation dates Georgetown University and Seton Hall cooker" climate of the world's biggest insur­ back nearly to the period of authorship. Law School, Peter Rodino established ance company. In behalf of its membership-drawn from an active law practice in New Jersey. Earlier, MacNaughton had broadened the 6,000 hospitals across the country-Ameri­ In addition, he has been involved in scope of the Pru in a variety of ways, includ­ can Hospital Association tells their story in numerous civic and political activities. ing leadership in the health-care field and full-page ads that "hospitals are holding Among the highlights of these are his development of the HMO movement. He re­ costs down; that rate of increase in health­ mains on the Prudential board, meanwhile care costs is at its lowest point in over 20 appointment by President Carter to filling an active role in Hospital Corp. of years." serve on the National Highway Safety America's mounted challenge to Blue Cross/ The association ads disclose: Hospital ad­ Commission, and his role as vice chair­ Blue Shield and other health insurers in the missions are down . hospital employment man of the 1980 Carter-Mondale cam­ developing drama that is "The New Health is down ... Patient length-of-stay is down, paign. Care" game. adding: • This "bullet" symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by the Member on the floor. 19922 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS July 22, 1985 "Cost containment is working for many IF ONLY LIVE AID CAN GET When an American rock fan shells out $35 reasons. The new prospective pricing system THROUGH for Live Aid, what assurances does that under Medicare provides new incentives to person have that the Ethiopian dictatorship control costs. Employers active in health will actually use donated supplies to feed care coalition and preferred provider organi­ HON. NEWT GINGRICH hungry people? None. zations <PPOs> are getting cost-saving re­ OF GEORGIA There are many aspects of this problem. sults for their companies." IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Kurt Jansson, deputy secretary general of New Jersey's Gov. Thomas Kean went a­ Monday, July 22, 1985 the United Nations, recently called for a stage on the subject a month ago keynoting pause in the donation of emergency supplies the Middle Atlantic Health Congress con­ • Mr. GINGRICH. Mr. Speaker, in from the West. He noted that the Ethiopian vention in Atlantic City. the following article, our colleague regime has been allowing hundreds of thou­ The Garden State's popular chief execu­ TOBY ROTH brings to all of our atten­ sands of tens of grain and other supplies to tive called for a regional approach rather tion the very real crisis of an Ethiopi­ pile up at the docks while diverting trucks than an intra-sta.te route for the realization an Government willing to starve its to smashing dissidents or moving Ethiopians of aims in the structuring of preventive own people to death to retain power.
Recommended publications
  • 2006 Minnesota Piglet Book
    The Taxpayers League Foundation and Citizens Against Government Waste 2006 MINNESOTA PIGLET BOOK “The Book St. Paul Doesn’t Want You to Read” TAXPAYERS LEAGUE FOUNDATION The Taxpayers League Foundation’s mission is to educate, motivate and mobilize citizen response on issues related to taxes and government spending in Minnesota. Our activities include holding public policy forums and conducting original research for publication and mass distribution. P.O. Box 120449 Saint Paul, MN 55112 Phone: (651) 294-3590 (Ext. 205) Internet Address: www.taxpayersleague.org CITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) is a private, nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to educating the American public about waste, mismanagement, and inefficiency in government. CAGW was founded in 1984 by J. Peter Grace and nationally-syndicated columnist Jack Anderson to build support for implementation of the Grace Commission recommendations and other waste-cutting proposals. Since its inception, CAGW has been at the forefront of the fight for efficiency, economy, and accountability in government. CAGW has more than one million members and supporters nationwide. Since 1986, CAGW and its members have helped save taxpayers more than $758 billion. CAGW’s official newsletter is Government WasteWatch, and the group produces special reports, and monographs examining government waste and what citizens can do to stop it. CAGW is classified as a Section 501(c)(3) organization under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and is recognized as a publicly- supported organization described in Section 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(A)(vi) of the code. Individuals, corporations, companies, associations, and foundations are eligible to support the work of CAGW through tax-deductible gifts.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Performance Review and Other Government Reform Initiatives: an Overview, 1993-2001
    Order Code RL30596 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web The National Performance Review and Other Government Reform Initiatives: An Overview, 1993-2001 Updated June 4, 2001 -name redacted- Specialist in American National Government -name redacted- and -name redacted- Analysts in American National Government Government and Finance Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress The National Performance Review and Other Government Reform Initiatives: An Overview, 1993-2001 Summary Shortly after his inauguration in 1993, President William Clinton announced he was initiating a National Performance Review (NPR) to be conducted over the next six months by a task force headed by Vice President Albert Gore, Jr. In September 1993, this task force delivered a report to the President, offering some 380 major recommendations concerning management reform, reorganization, and government downsizing. Implementation of these recommendations was to be accomplished through presidential directives, congressional action, and individual agency initiatives. A year later, in September 1994, the NPR issued a status report indicating that 90% of its initial recommendations were being implemented; $46.9 billion of its $108 billion in projected savings had been enacted; an additional $16 billion in savings was pending before Congress; and federal employment had dropped by 71,000 positions. Shortly after the release of this report, the November 1994 congressional elections gave the Republicans majority party control of the House and the Senate for the 104th Congress. Republican leaders had unveiled a Contract with America reform plan in late September 1994. Its core principles regarded the federal government as being too big, too expensive, unresponsive to the citizenry, and the perpetrator of burdensome regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Oklahoma Piglet Book
    Citizens Against Government Waste and The Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs 2004 OKLAHOMA PIGLET BOOK “The Book Oklahoma City Doesn’t Want You to Read” CITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) is a private, nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to educating the American public about waste, mismanagement, and inefficiency in the federal government. CAGW was founded in 1984 by J. Peter Grace and nationally-syndicated columnist Jack Anderson to build support for implementation of the Grace Commission recommendations and other waste-cutting proposals. Since its inception, CAGW has been at the forefront of the fight for efficiency, economy, and accountability in government. CAGW has more than one million members and supporters nationwide. Since 1986, CAGW and its members have helped save taxpayers more than $700 billion. CAGW publishes a quarterly newsletter, Government Waste Watch, and produces special reports and monographs examining government waste and what citizens can do to stop it. CAGW is classified as a Section 501(c)(3) organization under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and is recognized as a publicly-supported organization described in Section 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(A)(vi) of the code. Individuals, corporations, companies, associations, and foundations are eligible to support the work of CAGW through tax- deductible gifts. 1301 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 400 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 467-5300 Internet Address: www.cagw.org THE OKLAHOMA COUNCIL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS The Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs (OCPA) is a public policy research organization whose mission is to formulate and promote public policies consistent with the principles of free enterprise and limited government.
    [Show full text]
  • IP0281G: Grace Commission
    Congressional Research Service The Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 20540 GRACE COMMISSION IPO28 1G In response to numerous requests for information on the Grace Commission (formally known as the President's Private Sector Survey on Cost control) and its reports, or for a copy of the Summary Report issued on January 12, 1984, we have compiled the enclosed packet of materials. This includes statements from the Grace Commission summarizing the 2,478 recommendations on ways to save $424 billion of "waste" in the Federal Government over three years, as outlined in the 656-page, two-volume Summary Report. This Info Pack also includes a packet of newspaper and magazine articles which provide additional information on the Grace Commission and its Summary Report. A Fact Sheet provides information on where copies of the Grace Commission's Summary Report and its 36 Task Force Reports and 11 Special Reports may be purchased. An address is provided for the Government Printing Office (GPO), where constituents may place orders for copies of the Reports, or obtain a list of Federal depository libraries, which may have reference copies of the reports available for use. Members of Congress may obtain more information on this topic by calling CRS at 287-5700. We hope this information will be helpful. Congressional Reference Division THE PRESIDENT'S PRIVATE SECTOR SURVEY ON COST CONTROL FACT SHEET INFORMATION AND REPORT AVAILABILITY AFTER PPS SCC PPSSCC expects to close its offices in Washington on January 31, 1984. Reports will be available, however, at the Central Reference and Records Information Facility Hoover Building of the Department of Commerce 14th and Constitution Avenue NW Room 6628 .
    [Show full text]
  • The Report References
    The Private Sector Survey on Cost Control (PSSCC), commonly referred to as The Grace Commission, was an investigation requested by United States President Ronald Reagan, in 1982. The focus of it was waste and inefficiency in the US Federal government. Its head, businessman J. Peter Grace,[1] asked the members of that commission to "be bold" and "work like tireless bloodhounds. Don't leave any stone unturned in your search to root out inefficiency."[2] The report The Grace Commission Report was presented to Congress in January 1984. The report claimed that if its recommendations were followed, $424 billion could be saved in three years, rising to $1.9 trillion per year by the year 2000. It estimated that the national debt, without these reforms, would rise to $13 trillion by the year 2000, while with the reforms they projected it would rise to only $2.5 trillion.[3] Congress ignored the commission's report. The debt reached $5.8 trillion in the year 2000.[4] [5] The national debt reached 13 trillion after the subprime mortgage-collaterized debt obligation crisis in 2008. It should also be noted that the U.S. has spent at least $1 trillion on its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2001, with some estimates for real cost ranging near $3 trillion over time. [6] The report said that one-third of all income taxes is consumed by waste and inefficiency in the federal government, and another one-third escapes collection owing to the underground economy. “With two thirds of everyone’s personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt and by federal government contributions to transfer payments.
    [Show full text]
  • Reagan's State of Grace
    Providence College DigitalCommons@Providence History & Classics Undergraduate Theses History & Classics Spring 2021 Reagan’s State of Grace: J. Peter Grace and the Effort to Cut Government Expense at the Public’s Expense Kevin Michels Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.providence.edu/history_undergrad_theses Part of the Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Reagan’s State of Grace: J. Peter Grace and the Effort to Cut Government Expense at the Public’s Expense by Kevin Michels HIS 490 History Honors Thesis Department of History Providence College Spring 2021 ii iii DEDICATION To my family and friends, Dr. Sharon Murphy and Dr. Osama Siddiqui, and to the Providence College Department of History and Classics. You are all my saving grace. iv CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................1 The Origins of Big Government… ...................................................................................4 Reaganism as a Response to Big Government .................................................................6 CHAPTER 1. J. PETER GRACE: BUSINESSMAN & PUBLIC SERVANT ..........................12 Grace’s Corporate Presence ............................................................................................12 A Failure of Government Regulation .............................................................................19 Grace’s Government Presence ........................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Procurement Reform: a Mixed Record at Best by Dr. Joe Pegnato
    Federal Procurement Reform: A Mixed Record at Best By Dr. Joe Pegnato Former Director, Office of Acquisition Management U.S. Government Accountability Office 2707 Willow Drive Vienna, Virginia 22181 (703) 887-5338 [email protected] March 9, 2018 1 Federal Procurement Reform: A Mixed Record at Best INTRODUCTION “A government ill executed, whatever it may be in theory, must be in practice a poor government.” Federalist 70, Alexander Hamilton (Hamilton, Madison, Jay, 1961, p. 423). Given the enormous sum of public money funneled through the federal procurement system, Alexander Hamilton’s warning in Federalist 70 is extremely relevant. How well the procurement system performs is crucial to how well the federal government performs since $1 of every $6 spent by the federal government is spent by that procurement system. In 2015 that amounted to $437.4 billion (USASpending.Gov). The government buys a wide variety of products and services including office supplies, professional services, information technology, space exploration, and complex weapons systems. The widely held perception is that it takes too long and costs too much to buy the goods and services the government needs. Moreover, it is widely believed that too many contractors deliver inferior and defective products. Questions over the performance of the federal procurement system have persisted over the last 70 years. Attempts to reform the so called “poorly” performing federal procurement system are almost too numerous to count. Nevertheless, the federal procurement system seems to be subjected to incessant reform initiatives with every new Congress and presidential administration. According to Peter Eide and Charles Allen: “The history of acquisition reform reflects much has been done to study the problem, identify candidate solutions, and execute reforms, only to return to the conclusion that more reform is needed” (Acquisition Reform Journal, 2012, p.
    [Show full text]
  • We Should Disregard International Banking Influence in the Pursuit of Our Congressional Monetary Policy.”
    Presented © January 2011-2017 by Charles Savoie An Initiative to Protect Private Property Rights of American Citizens “A GIGANTIC CONSPIRACY WAS FORMED IN LONDON AND NEW YORK TO DEMONETIZE SILVER” ---Martin Walbert, “The Coming Battle—A Complete History of the National Banking Money Power in the United States” (1899) "A Secret Society gradually absorbing the wealth of the world." --- Last Will & Testament of diamond monopolist Cecil Rhodes “HERE AND EVERYWHERE” ARE YOU INTERESTED IN PROTECTING YOUR OWNERSHIP RIGHTS IN PRECIOUS METALS? THEN PLEASE READ THIS, TAKE WEEKS TO CHECK OUT THE DOCUMENTATION IF YOU DISPUTE IT, AND DO EVERYTHING YOU CAN TO ENCOURAGE THE WIDEST POSSIBLE READERSHIP FOR IT! THIS MEPHISTOPHELES AND HIS ASSOCIATES AND SUCCESSORS MUST BE STOPPED FROM USING THE PRESIDENT TO SEIZE SILVER AND GOLD! (There is no Simon Templar halo over his head!) Ted Butler, the most widely followed silver commentator, has often said to buy and hold physical, because that puts you beyond COMEX rule changes. That’s correct! However, there remains an immeasurably more insidious, far reaching entity that can change rules---Uncle Sam, and he’s tightly in the grasp of the same forces who’ve depressed silver for generations. Uncle Sam nationalized gold and silver in the Franklin Roosevelt administration; this is subject to a repeat! Now that the price can’t be suppressed, what’s next? FORBID OWNERSHIP! You have hours for professional sports and TV talk shows; how about some time for your property rights, without which you can go broke? Whether the excuse cited is North Korea, the Middle East or other, the actual reason is to break us and prevent capital formation on our part! Please read and act on what follows--- ******************************************************************* *** “What an awful thought it is that if we had not lost America, or if even now we could arrange with the present members of the United States Assembly and our House of Commons, the peace of the world is secured for all eternity.
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisition Reform — Lean 94-03
    ACQUISITION REFORM — LEAN 94-03 Prepared by: Ethan McKinney, Eugene Gholz, and Harvey M. Sapolsky The Policy and External Environment Focus Group Lean Aircraft Initiative Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 May 24, 1994 The authors acknowledge the financial support for this research made available by the Lean Aircraft Initiative at MIT sponsored jointly by the US Air Force and a group of aerospace companies. All facts, statements, opinions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not in any way reflect those of the Lean Aircraft Initiative, the US Air Force, the sponsoring companies (individually or as a group), or MIT. The latter are absolved from any remaining errors or shortcomings for which the authors take full responsibility. Many in and out of government believe that the weapons acquisition process is in need of reform. They argue that our weapons cost too much, frequently miss their promised performance targets, and rarely proceed according to their intended schedules. A long series of official studies of those failings have produced literally hundreds of proposals for reform, many of which have been implemented. But the belief remains that the acquisition process is in need of further reform. Here we review the major acquisition studies of the past and the underlying causes of the continual search for, and frustration of, reform. This review is a preliminary step toward policy recommendations for acquisition reform, but no such recommendations are offered here. Six reports command our attention. They are the ones commissioned directly by the President or the Congress with the goal of system-wide reform.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Big Government by J
    Hillsdale College, Hillsdale, Michigan 49242 January 1988 Volume 17, No. 1 The Problem of Big Government By J. Peter Grace Editor's Preview: "With all the serious than an ideological nature. For instance, problems we face today, the problem of big at least 600,000 civil service jobs are com­ government is among the most critical." pletely unnecessary, and the President's So says J. Peter Grace, undoubtedly the Private Sector Survey on Cost Control single most effective spokesman for reduc­ recommended in 1984 that they be privatiz­ ing the size and influence of government ed immediately. The survey recommend­ in the business community today. The ed a few other reforms, too - 2,478 of highly-publicized Grace Commission, charg­ them to be precise. But only a small ed by President Reagan with the task of number of these have been implemented. reporting on government waste and inef­ Why? One of the reasons lies in the fact iciency, made 2,478 specific recommen­ that the federal government is controlled dations and demonstrated how more than by Congress. Rarely do people realize how $400 billion could be saved in the first few many day-to-day actions of the government years after their implementation. Further­ are affected by the 535 elected members more, the Commission found that these of Congress who micromanage each agency cutbacks would actually improve public ser­ and thus exert a powerful influence beyond vices, rather than curtail them. Some of their legislative function. the recommendations were followed; most Let me illustrate. Several years ago, John have been ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1984 Joint Economic Report Report Joint Economic Committee Congress of the United States February 1984 Economic Report of Th
    98TH CONGRESS SENATE REPORT 2d Session I S 98-362 THE 1984 JOINT ECONOMIC REPORT REPORT OF THE JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES ON THE FEBRUARY 1984 ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL VIEWS * MARCH 1 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 27), 1984.-Ordered to be printed Printed for the use of the Joint Economic Committee U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 30-460 0 WASHINGTON: 1984 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE (Created pursuant to sec. 5(a) of Public Law 304, 79th Cong.) SENATE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ROGER W. JEPSEN, Iowa, Chairman LEE H. HAMILTON, Indiana, Vice Chairman WILLIAM V. ROTH, JR., Delaware GILLIS W. LONG, Louisiana JAMES ABDNOR, South Dakota PARREN J. MITCHELL, Maryland STEVEN D. SYMMS, Idaho AUGUSTUS F. HAWKINS, California MACK MATTINGLY, Georgia DAVID R. OBEY, Wisconsin ALFONSE M. D'AMATO, New York JAMES H. SCHEUER, New York LLOYD BENTSEN, Texas CHALMERS P. WYLIE, Ohio WILLIAM PROXMIRE, Wisconsin MARJORIE S. HOLT, Maryland EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts DANIEL E. LUNGREN, California PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine BRUCE R. BARTLETT, Executive Director JAMES K. GALBRAITH, Deputy Director CHARLES H. BRADFORD, Assistant Director RICHARD F. KAUFMAN, Assistant Director-GeneralCounsel (11) CHANGES IN ANNUAL GNP VELOCITY CHART 1.2 PERCENTAGE CHANGE 14.0 - 10.0. _ 6.0 - 2.0 l - 2.0 8 -6.0. -10.0 -14.0 -18.0 _ Il915 1925 1935 1945 1955 1965 , 1975 1985 Dashed lines show averagevelocitygrowth; (1915.40)= -0.4%, (1947-80)=3.6%, (1981- )= 1.0% VelocitydefinedasGNPdividedbyMlusingannualdata.
    [Show full text]
  • The Military-Industrial Complex and American Democracy
    Volume 6 | Issue 7 | Article ID 2834 | Jul 02, 2008 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus The Military-Industrial Complex and American Democracy Chalmers Johnson The Military-Industrial Complex andthe present moment, public opinion has usually American Democracy assumed that it involved more or less equitable relations -- often termed a "partnership" -- Chalmers Johnson between the high command and civilian overlords of the United States military and Most Americans have a rough idea what the privately-owned, for-profit manufacturing and term "military-industrial complex" means when service enterprises. Unfortunately, the truth of they come across it in a newspaper or hear a the matter is that, from the time they first politician mention it. President Dwight D. emerged, these relations were never equitable. Eisenhower introduced the idea to the public in his farewell address of January 17, 1961. "Our In the formative years of the military-industrial military organization today bears little relation complex, the public still deeply distrusted to that known by any of my predecessors in privately owned industrial firms because of the peacetime," he said, "or indeed by the fighting way they had contributed to the Great men of World War II and Korea... We have been Depression. Thus, the leading role in the newly compelled to create a permanent armaments emerging relationship was played by the industry of vast proportions... We must not fail official governmental sector. A deeply popular, to comprehend its grave implications... We charismatic president, FDR sponsored these must guard against the acquisition ofpublic-private relationships. They gained unwarranted influence, whether sought or further legitimacy because their purpose was to unsought, by the military-industrial complex." rearm the country, as well as allied nations around the world, against the gathering forces YouTube recording of fascism.
    [Show full text]