Chronology of Events

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chronology of Events CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER PEDRA BRANCA/ PULAU BATU PUTEH, MIDDLE ROCKS AND SOUTH LEDGE (MALAYSIA / SINGAPORE) EXTRACTED FROM THE WRITTEN PLEADINGS OF MALAYSIA AND SINGAPORE Legends: MM - Memorial of Malaysia MCM - Counter-Memorial of Malaysia MR - Reply of Malaysia SM - Memorial of Singapore SCM - Counter-Memorial of Singapore SR - Reply of Singapore Date Event/Document Discussion Location AGC NoteIRemarks r 1433 The first written record of PBP (Pia M para 33 MR para 9 did not refer to Chiao) was given by the Chinese the description as stated by navigator Cheng Ho sometime MR para 9 MOFA. MR para 9 refers to before 1433. Chinese navigator named Zheng He. The supporting documentlarticle cited in support of MM para 33 is not annexed to the pleadings 1511 Malacca captured by Portuguese. MM para 37 The supporting documentlarticle cited in MCM para 29 support of MM para 37 and MCM para 29 is not annexed MR Appendix I para B.4 to the pleadings. SCM Appendix A para 2 1512 Sultan Mahmud established what MM para 37 Winstedt, A History of Winstedt, A History of Johore, became the Sultanate of Johor. Johore, p 14. p 14. is not annexed to the MCM para 29 pleadings. SCM para 2.8 Discussion Location AGC NotelRemarks Portuguese Barros reported that MCM para 19 MCM Vol3 Annex 7 'White Rock.. is very much in demand by the pilots of those parts'. MR para 77 Johor Sultanate began formal MCM para 29 relations with Dutch East lndies Company (VOC). VOC was formed as a corporation MR para 69, ftn 125 with six chambers. MR Appendix 1, para B.6 Hugo Grotius recorded Johor as a MM para 38, ftn 14 The supporting Sultanate which 'has long been document/article cited in considered a sovereign principality'. MCM para 29 support of MM para 38 is not annexed to the pleadings Date EventIDocument Discussion Location AGC NoteIRemarks 17 March Earliest Dutch Treaty with Johor MM para 78 MM para 78 cited the earliest 1606 Dutch Treaty as 17 March MR para 69 1606 while MR para 69 cited a different date of 17 May 1606. Para C.l of Appendix 1 of MR supported the date of 17 May 1606. 17 May 1606 Admiral Cornelis Matelieff de longe MM para 39 MM para 39 and MCM para of the VOC contracted on behalf of 30 do not relate to the event the States-General with the Sultan of MCM Para 30 as stated by MOFA. Johor for his assistance in seizing the city of Malacca from the MR para 69, Appendix 1, Portuguese. para C.l 1641 The combined forces of Johor and MM para 39 The supporting the Dutch jointly conquered Malacca document/article cited in from the Portuguese. The Dutch MCM para 30 support of MM para 39 and took the town of Malacca and Johor MCM para 30 is not annexed acquired the territory around the SCM Appendix A para 4 to the pleadings. town. Date EventIDocument Discussion Location AGC NoteIRemarks 1 April 1655 Internal communication from the MM para 78 MM Vol3 Annex 22 Dutch Governor of Malacca to the Dutch Governor-General in Batavia. MR Para 70, Appendix 1, (Proposed that the VOC send two Para B-7 boats to "cruise to the south of Singapore Straits under the Hook of SCM para 4-17, 4.1 Barbukit and in the vicinity of Pedra Branca". This was to prevent SR para 2.45 Chinese junks from reaching the Johor River.) 26 Letter from the Dutch Governor- MM para 78-79 MM Vol3 Annex 21 December General to the Directors of the VOC 1662 reporting that the Sultan of Johor MR para 71 Appendix I had protested against the Dutch para B.7 practice of diverting trade away from Johor River to Malacca. SCM para 4.16, 4.18, 4.19 1685 - 1699 Reign of Assassination of Sultan MR Appendix II para 14 Andaya L., The Andaya L., The Kingdom of Mahmud II. He was assassinated in Kingdom of Johor, Johor, 1641-1728 (1975), at 1699. SCM para 3.14(b) 1641-1 728 (1975), at p. 78-79 is not annexed to the p. 78-79. pleadings. SCM Appendix A para 4 Date EventIDocument Discussion Location AGC NoteIRemarks 7 February The VOC signed a "convention" MR Appendix I para C.3, 1787 (conventie) with Johor to resolve the C4 difficulty faced by the Johor ruler, Sultan Mahmud, in paying the indemnity required under the 1784 Peace Treaty. May 1787 A fleet of 90 vessels carrying 7000 MR Appendix I para C.4 warriors appeared in Riau and destroyed the Dutch garrison there. SCM Appendix A Para 7 December The VOC returned with a fleet from MR Appendix I para C.4 1787 Malacca and retook the island of Riau. SCM Appendix A para 7 1793 - 1815 During the Napoleonic wars British MM para 40 (1793-1 81 5) MCM para 33 states the took temporary control of strategic duration of 1795-1813 and Dutch possessions including MCM para 33 (1795-1 814) not 1795-1814. Malacca (1795), the Moluccas (1796) and Java (1811). MR para 69 (1795-1 81 3) MR para 69 states the duration of 1795-1814 and not 1795-181 3. Date EventIDocument Discussion Location AGC NoteIRemarks 1794 Sultan Mahmud and the VOC MR Appendix I para C.5 negotiated the return of authority over the island of Riau to the ruler for a payment of 50,000 Spanish dollars. 1795 Dutch officials surrendered the city MR Appendix I para C.5 of Malacca to the English. SCM para 3.14(d), Appendix A para 8 - 1812 Sultan Mahmud Ill of Johor died. He MR p 50 had two sons, Hussein and Abdul Raham, the latter took the throne. MR Appendix I para C.6, Appendix II para 17 SMC para 3.14(e), Appendix A para 9 SM Chapter Ill para 3.3 Date EventIDocument Discussion Location AGC NoteIRemarks 13 August Convention between Great Britain MM para 41 MM Vol2 Annex 1 1814 and the Netherlands Relative to the Dutch Colonies. (Dutch sovereignty MCM Para 33 over its colonies in various continents, including Asia, was restored.) 1818 The English returned Malacca and MR Appendix I para C.5, Riau to the Dutch State. The Dutch C.6, C7, Appendix II para recognized Abdul Rahman as 17 successor to Sultan Mahmud in return for his agreement to the re- SCM Para 3.14(d), establishment of the Dutch post on Appendix A Para 8, 10 Riau. 28 Treaty between the Dutch and Abdul MR Appendix 1 para C.5, November Rahman was signed which renewed C.6, C.15, Appendix II the 1784 Treaty. para 17 It was further elaborated in a treaty SCM para 3.1 4(d), of4April 1820. Appendix A para 8 Date Event/Document Discussion Location AGC NoteIRemarks 1819-1824 Great Britain and the Netherlands MCM para 15, 33, 36 MM Annex 1,5 MCM para 15 and 36 do not were in protracted negotiations on a relate to the event as demarcation of their spheres of SCM para 3.16, 2.22, 3.23 described by MOFA. influence in the region. MM para 15 and MM Annex 1 refers to a 3 August 1814 Convention between the Great Britain and Netherlands. SCM para 3.16 does not relate to the event as described by MOFA. SCM Chapter 2 only ends at para 2.1 1. Hence, there is no para 2.22. SCM para 3.23 does not relate to the event as described by MOFA. Date ~ Discussion Location AGC NotelRemarks 1 30 January Agreement between the EIC and the MM para 45,47, 62, 48, MM Vol2 Annex 2 MCM para 107 does not 1819 Temenggong of Johore. (EIC relate to 30 January 1819 obtained parts of Singapore to build Agreement. a factory.) MCM para 34,107 MR para 75, 96, 108, Appendix I para C.7, Appendix II para 17 SM para 1.7, 3.3 SCM Appendix A para 11 6 February Treaty of Friendship and Alliance MM para 45,48, 62, 167 MM Vol2 Annex 3 1819 between Sir Stamford Raffles and Sultan Hussain Mahummad Shah, MCM para 34 Sultan of Johore, and Dato Temenggong Sri Maharajah Abdul- MR para 67, 75, 96, 108, Rahman. (The Port of Singapore Appendix I para C8, was to be considered under the Appendix I1 para 17 immediate protection and subject to the regulations of the British SM para 1.7, 3.4 authorities.) SCM Appendix A para 11 Date Event/Document Discussion Location AGC NoteIRemarks 26 June Arrangements made for the MM para 48,62, 167 MM Vol2 Annex 4 MM para 46 which is not 1819 Government of Singapore, listed should be the most Singapore. Supplementary MR para 75, 96 relevant para in regard to the Arrangement was concluded with arrangements of 26 June the Sultan and Temenggong of 1819 referred to by MOFA. Johor, detailing the boundaries of the area on the island of Singapore which would be under the control of the EIC for purposes of establishing the factory. / 13 October The regalia was taken by force from MR Appendix I para C.9 1822 Engku Puteri by Dutch representatives making possible the SCM Appendix A Para 9 formal installation of Sultan Abdul Raham as ruler of Riau-Lingga the following year. Date EvenVDocument Discussion Location AGC NotelRemarks 10 January Letter from Crawfurd (Resident in MM para 80 MM Vol2 Annex 58 The document cited in 1824 Singapore) to Swinton (The support of MM para 80 is not Secretary to the Government in MR para 76 SCM Annex 2, 17 annexed to the pleading.
Recommended publications
  • Resolution Msc.73(69)
    RESOLUTION MSC.73(69) (adopted on 19 May 1998) MANDATORY SHIP REPORTING SYSTEMS RESOLUTION MSC.73(69) (adopted on 19 May 1998) MANDATORY SHIP REPORTING SYSTEMS MSC 69/22/Add.1 ANNEX 10 RESOLUTION MSC.73(69) (adopted on 19May 1998) MANDATORY SHIP REPORTING SYSTEMS THE MARITIME SAFETY COMMITTEE, RECALLING Article 28(b) of the Convention on the International Maritime Organization concerning the functions of the Committee, RECALLING ALSO regulation V/8-1 of the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974 concerning the adoption by the Organization of ship reporting systems, RECALLING FURTHER resolution A.858(20) which authorizes the Committee to perform the function of adopting ship reporting systems on behalf of the Organization, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT the Guidelines and criteria for ship reporting systems, adopted by resolution MSC.43(64), HAVING CONSIDERED the recommendation of the Sub-Committee on Safety of Navigation at its forty-third session, 1. ADOPTS, in accordance with SOLAS regulation V/8-1, mandatory ship reporting systems: - "In the Straits of Malacca and Singapore" area described in Annex 1 to the present resolution; and - "In the Strait of Bonifacio" area described in Annex 2. 2. DECIDES that the aforementioned mandatory ship reporting systems will enter into force at 0000 hours UTC on 1 December 1998. 3. REQUESTS the Secretary-General to bring this resolution and its Annexes to the attention of Members of the Organization and Contracting Governments to the 1974 SOLAS Convention. I:\MSC\69\22-A1.WPD RESOLUTION
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore, July 2006
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Singapore, July 2006 COUNTRY PROFILE: SINGAPORE July 2006 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Singapore (English-language name). Also, in other official languages: Republik Singapura (Malay), Xinjiapo Gongheguo― 新加坡共和国 (Chinese), and Cingkappãr Kudiyarasu (Tamil) சி க யரச. Short Form: Singapore. Click to Enlarge Image Term for Citizen(s): Singaporean(s). Capital: Singapore. Major Cities: Singapore is a city-state. The city of Singapore is located on the south-central coast of the island of Singapore, but urbanization has taken over most of the territory of the island. Date of Independence: August 31, 1963, from Britain; August 9, 1965, from the Federation of Malaysia. National Public Holidays: New Year’s Day (January 1); Lunar New Year (movable date in January or February); Hari Raya Haji (Feast of the Sacrifice, movable date in February); Good Friday (movable date in March or April); Labour Day (May 1); Vesak Day (June 2); National Day or Independence Day (August 9); Deepavali (movable date in November); Hari Raya Puasa (end of Ramadan, movable date according to the Islamic lunar calendar); and Christmas (December 25). Flag: Two equal horizontal bands of red (top) and white; a vertical white crescent (closed portion toward the hoist side), partially enclosing five white-point stars arranged in a circle, positioned near the hoist side of the red band. The red band symbolizes universal brotherhood and the equality of men; the white band, purity and virtue. The crescent moon represents Click to Enlarge Image a young nation on the rise, while the five stars stand for the ideals of democracy, peace, progress, justice, and equality.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Notes on the Malayan Law of Negligence
    Cleveland State Law Review Volume 9 Issue 3 Psychiatry and Law (A Symposium) Article 10 1960 Some Notes on the Malayan Law of Negligence A. E. S. Tay J. H. M. Heah Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Torts Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation A. E. S. Tay & J. H. M. Heah, Some Notes on the Malayan Law of Negligence, 9 Clev.-Marshall L. Rev. 490 (1960) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Some Notes on the Malayan Law of Negligence A. E. S. Tay* and J. H. M. Heah** T HE TERM "MALAYA" COVERS what are now two distinct political units: the fully independent Federation of Malaya and the semi-independent State of Singapore, which have emerged from a tangle of British settlements and colonies and British-protected Malay states. The State of Singapore has sprung from the Crown Colony of Singapore, which between 1826 and 1946 formed part of the larger Crown Colony of the Straits Settle- ments. The two remaining Straits settlements-Penang (includ- ing Province Wellesley) and Malacca-together with nine Malay states' have become the Federation of Malaya. Although Penang and Malacca, as British territories, have a very different legal history from that of the Malay states, their welding together into a political unit has been followed by legislation giving statu- tory foundation for the application of the English common law throughout the Federation; the historical differences, then, have lost their practical point.
    [Show full text]
  • Concern of Veterinary Authorities with Respect to Borders Crossing
    Concern of Veterinary Authorities With Respect to Borders Crossing NURUL HUSNA ZULKIFLI DEPARTMENT OF VETERINARY SERVICES MALAYSIA 19 FEBRUARY 2019 DEPARTMENT OF VETERINARY SERVICES MALAYSIA 01 Overview Under the Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-Based Industries (MOA) Malaysia 02 Responsibility Veterinary competent authority of Malaysia 03 Scope Responsible in performing risk analysis as well as development of import requirements and for issuance of veterinary health certificate (as stated under the Provisions of Animals Act 1953, Section 16. DEPARTMENT OF QUARANTINE & INSPECTION SERVICES MALAYSIA (MAQIS) 01 Overview Under the Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-Based Industries (MOA) Malaysia 02 Responsibility One stop centre for quarantine and inspection services 03 Scope Responsible in the enforcement of written laws at entry point, quarantine stations and quarantine premises as well as in the issuance of permits, licenses and certificates of import and export DVS as a competent authority responsible in the approval of animal and animal products movement STATE DVS IN MALAYSIA 1. Perlis 2. Kedah 3. Pulau Pinang 4. Kelantan 5. Terengganu 6. Perak 7. Pahang 8. Selangor 9. Putrajaya (Headquarters) 10. Negeri Sembilan 11. Melaka 12. Johor 13. Labuan MAQIS as main agency responsible in quarantine, inspection and enforcement STATE MAQIS IN MALAYSIA 1. Selangor/Negeri Sembilan 2. Johor/Melaka 3. Pulau Pinang 4. Kedah 5. Kelantan 6. Perlis 7. Perak 8. Labuan 9. Pahang/Terengganu MAQIS Quarantine Station Labuan KLIA • KLIA Quarantine Station • Padang
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Political Development and Demographic Features
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/36062 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation Author: Xiaodong Xu Title: Genesis of a growth triangle in Southeast Asia : a study of economic connections between Singapore, Johor and the Riau Islands, 1870s – 1970s Issue Date: 2015-11-04 Chapter 2 Political Development and Demographic Features A unique feature distinguishing this region from other places in the world is the dynamic socio-political relationship between different ethnic groups rooted in colonial times. Since then, both conflict and compromise have occurred among the Europeans, Malays and Chinese, as well as other regional minorities, resulting in two regional dichotomies: (1) socially, the indigenous (Malays) vs. the outsiders (Europeans, Chinese, etc.); (2) politically, the rulers (Europeans and Malay nobles) vs. those ruled (Malays, Chinese). These features have a direct impact on economic development. A retrospective survey of regional political development and demographic features are therefore needed to provide a context for the later analysis of economic development. 1. Political development The formation of Singapore, Johor and the Riau Islands was far from a sudden event, but a long process starting with the decline of the Johor-Riau Sultanate in the late eighteenth century. In order to reveal the coherency of regional political transformations, the point of departure of this political survey begins much earlier than the researched period here. Political Development and Demographic Features 23 The beginning of Western penetration (pre-1824) Apart from their geographical proximity, Singapore, Johor and the Riau Islands had also formed a natural and inseparable part of various early unified kingdoms in Southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Building ASEAN Community: Political–Security and Socio-Cultural Reflections
    ASEAN@50 Volume 4 Building ASEAN Community: Political–Security and Socio-cultural Reflections Edited by Aileen Baviera and Larry Maramis Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia © Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia, 2017 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means electronic or mechanical without prior written notice to and permission from ERIA. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia, its Governing Board, Academic Advisory Council, or the institutions and governments they represent. The findings, interpretations, conclusions, and views expressed in their respective chapters are entirely those of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia, its Governing Board, Academic Advisory Council, or the institutions and governments they represent. Any error in content or citation in the respective chapters is the sole responsibility of the author/s. Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted with proper acknowledgement. Cover Art by Artmosphere Design. Book Design by Alvin Tubio. National Library of Indonesia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data ISBN: 978-602-8660-98-3 Department of Foreign Affairs Kagawaran ng Ugnayang Panlabas Foreword I congratulate the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), the Permanent Mission of the Philippines to ASEAN and the Philippine ASEAN National Secretariat for publishing this 5-volume publication on perspectives on the making, substance, significance and future of ASEAN.
    [Show full text]
  • Tareqat Alawiyah As an Islamic Ritual Within Hadhrami's Arab in Johor
    Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 14 (12): 1708-1715, 2013 ISSN 1990-9233 © IDOSI Publications, 2013 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.14.12.3564 Tareqat Alawiyah as an Islamic Ritual Within Hadhrami’s Arab in Johor Nurulwahidah Fauzi, Tarek Ladjal, Tatiana A. Denisova, Mohd Roslan Mohd Nor and Aizan Ali Mat Zin Department of Islamic History and Civilization, Academy of Islamic Studies, University Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia INTRODUCTION Abdul Majid was furthermore a descendant of Sayid Idrus and was appointed as the Prime Minister of the Sultanate The state of Johor Darul Takzim is deemed to be one of Johor Lama from 1688-1697 [5]. Other official data of the most unique states in Malaysia. The uniqueness of regarding the population of Arab communities; especially the state is reflected in its historical roots where the state with regards to the Hadrami Arabs cannot be accurately was ruled across two different eras of the Sultanate. In the determined as Johor was under the control of the first era first era, the state was controlled under the Sultanate of of Sultanate with exception to a few historical chronicles Johor-Riau (1511-1685) which is also known as Johor as mentioned above. The reason for this is mainly Lama [1-3] where the administrative centre was located at because during such a time Johor was still passing Tanjung Batu. The second era shows the birth of the through a demanding stage requiring it to defend its Modern Johor Sultanate known as Johor Baru from 1686 freedom from threats stemming from the Portuguese and until today.
    [Show full text]
  • M.V. Solita's Passage Notes
    M.V. SOLITA’S PASSAGE NOTES SABAH BORNEO, MALAYSIA Updated August 2014 1 CONTENTS General comments Visas 4 Access to overseas funds 4 Phone and Internet 4 Weather 5 Navigation 5 Geographical Observations 6 Flags 10 Town information Kota Kinabalu 11 Sandakan 22 Tawau 25 Kudat 27 Labuan 31 Sabah Rivers Kinabatangan 34 Klias 37 Tadian 39 Pura Pura 40 Maraup 41 Anchorages 42 2 Sabah is one of the 13 Malaysian states and with Sarawak, lies on the northern side of the island of Borneo, between the Sulu and South China Seas. Sabah and Sarawak cover the northern coast of the island. The lower two‐thirds of Borneo is Kalimantan, which belongs to Indonesia. The area has a fascinating history, and probably because it is on one of the main trade routes through South East Asia, Borneo has had many masters. Sabah and Sarawak were incorporated into the Federation of Malaysia in 1963 and Malaysia is now regarded a safe and orderly Islamic country. Sabah has a diverse ethnic population of just over 3 million people with 32 recognised ethnic groups. The largest of these is the Malays (these include the many different cultural groups that originally existed in their own homeland within Sabah), Chinese and “non‐official immigrants” (mainly Filipino and Indonesian). In recent centuries piracy was common here, but it is now generally considered relatively safe for cruising. However, the nearby islands of Southern Philippines have had some problems with militant fundamentalist Muslim groups – there have been riots and violence on Mindanao and the Tawi Tawi Islands and isolated episodes of kidnapping of people from Sabah in the past 10 years or so.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Change Research Projects in Malaysia
    Land Use Change Research Projects in Malaysia Mastura Mahmud Earth Observation Centre Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia NASA-LCLUC Science Team Joint Meeting with MAIRS, GOFC-GOLD and SEA START Programs on Land-Cover/Land-Use Change Processes in Monsoon Asia Region, January 12-17, 2009 in Khon Kaen, Thailand Outline of presentation • Large Development Regions • Landslide Issues • Biomass Burning and Impacts South Johor Development Area • Iskandar Malaysia covers 221,634.1 hectares (2,216.3 km²) of land area within the southern most part of Johor. • The development region encompasses an area about 3 times the size of Singapore. • Iskandar Malaysia covers the entire district of Johor Bahru (including the island within the district), Mukim Jeram Batu, Mukim Sungai Karang, Mukim Serkat, and Kukup Island in Mukim Ayer Masin, all within the district of Pontian. • Five Flagship Zones are proposed as key focal points for developments in the Iskandar Malaysia. Four of the focal points will be located in the Nusajaya-Johor Bahru-Pasir Gudang corridor (Special Economic Corridor -(SEC)). The flagship zones would strengthen further existing economic clusters as well as to diversify and develop targeted growth factors. • Flagship Zone A – Johor Bahru City Centre(New financial district , Central business district , Danga Bay integrated waterfront city , Tebrau Plentong mixed development , Causeway (Malaysia/Singapore) • Flagship Zone B - Nusajaya (Johor state administrative centre , Medical hub , Educity , International destination resort , Southern Industrial logistic cluster ) • Flagship Zone C - Western Gate Development (Port of Tanjung Pelepas , 2nd Link (Malaysia/Singapore) , Free Trade Zone , RAMSAR World Heritage Park , Tanjung Piai ) • Flagship Zone D - Eastern Gate Development ( Pasir Gudang Port and industrial zone , Tanjung Langsat Port , Tanjung Langsat Technology Park, Kim-Kim regional distribution centre ).
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “ Missing Page(s)“ . If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in “sectioning" the material. It is customary tc begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from “ photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and Around the Straits of Johor (Malaysia V
    REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES Case concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor (Malaysia v. Singapore), decision of 1 September 2005 1 September 2005 VOLUME XXVII pp.133-145 NATIONS UNIES - UNITED NATIONS Copyright (c) 2008 PART III _______________ Case concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor (Malaysia v. Singapore) Decision of 1 September 2005 _______________ Affaire relative à la Réclamation territoriale de Singapour à l’intérieur et à proximité du détroit de Johor (Malaisie c. Singapour) Décision du 1er septembre 2005 CASE CONCERNING LAND RECLAMATION BY SINGAPORE IN AND AROUND THE STRAITS OF JOHOR (MALAYSIA V. SINGAPORE), DECISION OF 1 SEPTEMBER 2005 AFFAIRE RELATIVE À LA RÉCLAMATION TERRITORIALE DE SINGAPOUR À L’INTÉRIEUR ET À PROXIMITÉ DU DÉTROIT DE JOHOR (MALAISIE C. SINGAPOUR), DÉCISION DU 1ER SEPTEMBRE 2005 Jurisdiction of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS)–jurisdiction to prescribe provisional measures under article 290, paragraph 5 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, pending a decision by the Arbitral Tribunal–compliance of the Parties with the order of ITLOS. Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal–constitution under annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea–prima facie jurisdiction to settle the dispute between the Parties–examination of the Settlement Agreement agreed by the Parties– adoption of the final award binding upon the Parties in the terms set out in the Settlement Agreement. Compétence du Tribunal international du droit de la mer (TIDM)–compétence pour prescrire des mesures conservatoires en vertu de l’article 290, paragraphe 5 de la Convention des Nations Unies sur le droit de la mer, dans l’attente de la décision du Tribunal arbitral–soumission des Parties à l’ordonnance du TIDM.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Coding Units
    INSTITUTE Country Coding Units v11.1 - March 2021 Copyright © University of Gothenburg, V-Dem Institute All rights reserved Suggested citation: Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, and Lisa Gastaldi. 2021. ”V-Dem Country Coding Units v11.1” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Funders: We are very grateful for our funders’ support over the years, which has made this ven- ture possible. To learn more about our funders, please visit: https://www.v-dem.net/en/about/ funders/ For questions: [email protected] 1 Contents Suggested citation: . .1 1 Notes 7 1.1 ”Country” . .7 2 Africa 9 2.1 Central Africa . .9 2.1.1 Cameroon (108) . .9 2.1.2 Central African Republic (71) . .9 2.1.3 Chad (109) . .9 2.1.4 Democratic Republic of the Congo (111) . .9 2.1.5 Equatorial Guinea (160) . .9 2.1.6 Gabon (116) . .9 2.1.7 Republic of the Congo (112) . 10 2.1.8 Sao Tome and Principe (196) . 10 2.2 East/Horn of Africa . 10 2.2.1 Burundi (69) . 10 2.2.2 Comoros (153) . 10 2.2.3 Djibouti (113) . 10 2.2.4 Eritrea (115) . 10 2.2.5 Ethiopia (38) . 10 2.2.6 Kenya (40) . 11 2.2.7 Malawi (87) . 11 2.2.8 Mauritius (180) . 11 2.2.9 Rwanda (129) . 11 2.2.10 Seychelles (199) . 11 2.2.11 Somalia (130) . 11 2.2.12 Somaliland (139) . 11 2.2.13 South Sudan (32) . 11 2.2.14 Sudan (33) .
    [Show full text]