<<

For more information, contact: Restoring Life to the : U.S. Geological Survey/National Research Center, 700 Cajundome Blvd., Lafayette, LA 70506; 337-266-8500; Addressing Gulf , a Fax: 337­266­8513; http://ww w.nwrc.usgs.gov National Problem , and dead organisms have been found there.

Where The zone occurs between the inner and mid-continental shelf of the northern , from the birdfoot delta westward, to the upper .

When There has been awareness of the problem since the 1970’s, but scientists are unsure whether or not this is a recent problem that has been worsened by nutrient application.

Why The zone is caused by increased nutrients from the Mississippi River, especially and from , animal wastes, and domestic sewage; seasonal river discharges worsen the nutrient enrichment. Average - nitrogen concentration in the river’s Interior watersheds of the Mississippi River Basin, the source of materials causing the 6,000- to 7,000- mainstem has doubled since 1950, with square-mile “dead zone,” or hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. commercial fertilizers being the largest source. Nutrients encourage algal blooms, alter the , and eventually Issue deplete the area of oxygen. The hypoxic zone in the Gulf of Mexico, the so-called “dead zone” Significance lacking enough oxygen to support The Gulf’s hypoxic zone rivals the most , is one of the largest largest hypoxic areas in the world such as environmental issues of the decade. those in the and . Practical solutions, based on sound Change in distribution of shrimp and science, are needed. pose a potential threat to the Gulf of Mexico’s $4 billion a year seafood What economy. Furthermore, though the Gulf The hypoxic zone is in an area of bears the effects of the nutrients, the approximately 6,000-7,000 square miles source of the nutrients is a national of water with oxygen levels below 2 problem, involving the entire interior parts per million. Trawlers are unable watersheds of the Mississippi River Basin to catch any shrimp or bottom- and especially States from the Upper dwelling fish at this low level of Distribution of water hypoxia from July 21-25, 1998. Data from Hypoxia Monitoring Studies of Mississippi Valley—Minnesota, Wiscon- N.N. Rabalais, R.E. Turner, and W.J. Wiseman, Jr. sin, , Illinois, and Missouri—and the

U.S. Department of the Interior USGS FS-016-00 U.S. Geological Survey June 2000 lower Mississippi Valley—Tennessee, Agency, U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Arkansas, Mississippi, and . Natural Resources Conservation Service, and the States of Arkansas, Texas, Solution Louisiana, and Mississippi. The FY1999 Department of the Interior budget for USGS contains a request for the Future National Wetlands Research Center to With additional funding, the Center can conduct a $200,000 pilot project to • Assess the impacts of nutrient demonstrate how to use wetlands to enrichment on and estuarine- reduce nutrients. dependent biological resources, in loading and the hypoxia zone offshore, the cooperation with the States of USGS National Wetlands Research Center Attacking theProblem Mississippi, Texas, and Louisiana, the has chosen to take another approach— National Marine Service, using inland and coastal wetlands to and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Background attack the hypoxia problem. Service. About 25% of the nitrogen load in the • Assess the effects of agricultural Best Mississippi River originates in the Lower Research Activities Management Practices in reducing Mississippi River Valley, downstream of With NAWQA researchers, Center nutrient inflows at the watershed the Mississippi-Ohio River confluence. scientists will level in the While most work related to the hypoxia • Assess the role of coastal and inland Valley. issue involves either nitrogen reduction in wetlands in reducing nutrients that the upper reaches of the Mississippi Basin are transported into coastal waters. or in understanding the relation of nutrient • Develop a model of interactions between wetland and other habitats and water quality.

Users Information from the research is particularly needed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Marine Fisheries Service, National Park Service, U.S. Environmental Protection