Assessment of the Yengo Wilderness (PDF

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Assessment of the Yengo Wilderness (PDF Assessment of the NSW NATIONAL PARKS AND WILDLIFE YYeennggoo SERVICE W I L D E R N E S S Central, Conservation Programs and Planning Division NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service November 2001 ASSESSMENT OF THE YENGO WILDERNESS Central Conservation Programs & Planning Division NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service November 2001 ASSESSMENT OF THE YENGO WILDERNESS CONTENTS List of Tables ................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures.................................................................................................. 3 Abbreviations appearing in report ................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................5 1 Introduction................................................................................................ 8 2 Definition and History of Wilderness ..................................................... 10 2.1 Concept of Wilderness.............................................................................. 10 2.2 History of Wilderness................................................................................ 12 2.3 Definitions of Wilderness .......................................................................... 14 3 Identification of Wilderness.................................................................... 16 3.1 Criteria under National Wilderness Inventory............................................ 16 3.2 Criteria under Wilderness Act ................................................................... 17 3.2.1 Naturalness ....................................................................................... 18 3.2.2 Solitude and appropriate self-reliant recreation.................................. 18 3.2.3 Size.................................................................................................... 19 3.3 Assessment Methodology......................................................................... 20 3.3.1 Capability assessment ....................................................................... 20 3.3.2 Suitability assessment ....................................................................... 21 4 Description of Assessment Area............................................................ 23 4.1 Location .................................................................................................... 23 4.2 History of Wilderness Proposals in the Region ......................................... 23 4.3 Land Included in Assessment Area........................................................... 24 4.4 Geology and Geomorphology ................................................................... 24 4.5 Climate ..................................................................................................... 25 4.6 Plants........................................................................................................ 26 4.7 Animals..................................................................................................... 28 4.8 Aboriginal History and Heritage ................................................................ 29 4.9 European History and Use of the Area...................................................... 30 5 Capability Assessment............................................................................ 35 5.1 Naturalness and Disturbance.................................................................... 38 5.1.1 Grazing and clearing.......................................................................... 38 5.1.2 Infrastructure ..................................................................................... 41 5.1.3 Logging.............................................................................................. 42 5.1.4 Fire .................................................................................................... 44 5.1.5 Mining ................................................................................................ 46 5.1.6 Introduced species............................................................................. 46 5.1.7 Roads, trails and tracks ..................................................................... 47 5.1.8 Bushrock removal .............................................................................. 49 5.1.9 Water quality...................................................................................... 50 5.1.10 Results of the naturalness / wilderness capability assessment....... 51 5.1.11 Summary of the naturalness / wilderness capability assessment ... 68 5.2 Size........................................................................................................... 69 5.3 Solitude and Self-reliant Recreation.......................................................... 69 5.4 Identified Yengo Wilderness ..................................................................... 69 ASSESSMENT OF THE YENGO WILDERNESS 6 Suitability Assessment............................................................................ 74 6.1 Suitable Boundary..................................................................................... 74 7 Management of the Declared Yengo Wilderness.................................. 78 7.1 The Declaration Process........................................................................... 78 7.2 Consultation with Landowners and Stakeholders...................................... 79 7.3 Plan of Management for Yengo National Park and Parr State Recreation Area.......................................................................................................... 80 7.4 Roads and Trails....................................................................................... 80 7.5 Recreation ................................................................................................ 80 7.6 Fire ........................................................................................................... 81 7.7 Introduced Species ................................................................................... 82 8 Recommendations for Declaration of the Yengo Wilderness.............. 83 REFERENCES................................................................................................. 84 Appendix 1 Detailed Description of Assessment Area ............................. 87 List of Tables page Table 1: Assessment of the Yengo wilderness - areas 7 Table 2: Averages of selected climate variables for two locations adjacent to assessment area 25 Table 3: Mean annual rainfall for several locations adjacent to assessment area 26 Table 4: Thresholds for determining categories of disturbance for Yengo Wilderness Assessment 36 Table 5: Disturbed sites within assessment area & disturbance categories, Yengo Wilderness Assessment Area 52 List of Figures page Figure 1: Recommended Yengo Wilderness following p. 71 Abbreviations appearing in report ANZECC Australian & New Zealand Environment & Conservation Council ASL above sea level BP before present NFPS National Forest Policy Statement NP National Park NPWS NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service NWI National Wilderness Inventory PO permissive occupancy SRA State Recreation Area ASSESSMENT OF THE YENGO WILDERNESS IDENTIFICATION OF THE YENGO WILDERNESS I, Brian Gilligan, Director-General of NSW National Parks and Wildlife, having considered the findings and recommendations contained in “Assessment of the Yengo Wilderness”, dated November 2001, identify as wilderness, in accordance with the requirements of section 6 of the Wilderness Act 1987, the area described in this report and shown by a black line in Figure 9 of this report. Brian Gilligan Director-General NSW National Parks and Wildlife 4 ASSESSMENT OF THE YENGO WILDERNESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Wilderness is a large area of land which, together with its native plant and animal communities, and the ecosystems of which they are a part, is largely unmodified. Wilderness areas represent the most intact and undisturbed expanses of our remaining natural landscapes. An assessment of the Yengo area has been conducted in accordance with the Wilderness Act 1987 in order to determine whether there are lands which are considered capable and suitable for declaration as wilderness. Yengo is located between the Hunter Valley and the Hawkesbury and Colo Rivers, i.e. approximately 100 km north of Sydney. The assessment area of potential wilderness consists of approximately 193,000 hectares, mainly encompassing Yengo National Park, Parr State Recreation Area and small areas of vacant Crown land, leasehold land and freehold land. The NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) is responsible for assessments under the Wilderness Act 1987. This wilderness assessment project has been undertaken as a part of the Comprehensive Regional Assessments (CRAs) of forests in New South Wales. The CRAs provide the scientific basis for regional forest agreements (RFAs) for major forest areas in New South Wales. The agreements determine the future use of forests. The wilderness assessments undertaken in 1998-99 assisted the CRA negotiations, however wilderness was not formally identified at this stage. Since the initial forest agreements the NPWS have selected a refined wilderness assessment boundary that includes potential wilderness from the National Wilderness Inventory. During the Yengo assessment, discussions with landowners and local stakeholders as well as a formal public consultation phase provided important input into the
Recommended publications
  • Directions to St Albans Courthouse
    The best way to the St Albans Courthouse, Homestead and Stables is to take the Webbs Creek vehicular ferry via Wisemans Ferry (this Ferry is FREE and runs 24hr). Please note that there are 2 ferry services in Wisemans Ferry. NB: There is no mobile recepJon beyond Wisemans Ferry – therefore we recommend that you have a printed copy of the direcJons. IMPORTANT NOTE FOR GPS USERS If you have the "Ferry" opJon switched off on your GPS, you will be sent the long way on a dirt 4WD track. This will increase your journey by at least an hour, and is a narrow, steep, twisty and hard to negoate. Check your GPS sengs or follow the driving direcJons below. The best GPS direcons: IniJally enter the following address: 3004 River Rd, Wisemans Ferry NSW 2775. This address will direct you to the Webbs Creek vehicle Ferry crossing. Join the queue and take the vehicle ferry across the Hawkesbury River to Webbs Creek. On disembarking the ferry, follow this road to the right for 21kms, go straight past the St Albans bridge, and take the NEXT driveway on the leY. Southern & Eastern Suburbs, (Airport) Direc8ons Travel via Eastern Distributor, Harbour Bridge or Harbour Tunnel, along Warringah express way (M1). ConJnue through the Lane Cove tunnel, then along the M2 taking the Pennant Hill Rd A28 exit. Turn right at top of ramp, on to Pennant Hills Rd A28 and conJnue a short distance(1.2km) taking the leY exit onto Castle Hill Rd. ConJnue in right lane turning right at the 2nd set of lights (650m) into New Line Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • GBMWHA Summary of Natural & Cultural Heritage Information
    GREATER BLUE MOUNTAINS WORLD HERITAGE AREA Summary of Natural & Cultural Heritage Information compiled by Ian Brown Elanus Word and Image for NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service November 2004 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2 2. Essential Facts 3 3. World Heritage Values 5 4. Geography, Landscape and Climate 6 5. Geology and Geomorphology 8 6. Vegetation 13 7. Fauna 15 8. Aboriginal Cultural Heritage 16 9. Non-Aboriginal Cultural Heritage 18 10. Conservation History 20 11. Selected References 24 Summary of Natural and Cultural Heritage Information Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area November 2004 1 1. INTRODUCTION This document was prepared as a product of the Interpretation and Visitor Orientation Plan for the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area. It is intended primarily as a summary reference of key information for use by those who are preparing public information and interpretation for the world heritage area. It is not intended to be fully comprehensive and anyone requiring detailed information on any topic is encouraged to refer to the list of selected references and additional material not listed. It is also recommended that all facts quoted here are checked from primary sources. A major source for this document was the Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area Nomination (see reference list), which is a very useful compendium of information but of limited availability. All other key sources used in compiling this summary are listed in the references, along with some other useful documents which were not consulted. Some items of information contained here (eg. total area of wilderness and comparisons with other east coast wilderness areas) have been derived from original research for this project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves
    The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves Project funded under the Central Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division Biodiversity Data Priorities Program Conservation Assessment and Data Unit Conservation Programs and Planning Branch, Metropolitan Environmental Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CADU (Central) Manager Special thanks to: Julie Ravallion Nattai NP Area staff for providing general assistance as well as their knowledge of the CADU (Central) Bioregional Data Group area, especially: Raf Pedroza and Adrian Coordinator Johnstone. Daniel Connolly Citation CADU (Central) Flora Project Officer DEC (2004) The Native Vegetation of the Nattai Nathan Kearnes and Bargo Reserves. Unpublished Report. Department of Environment and Conservation, CADU (Central) GIS, Data Management and Hurstville. Database Coordinator This report was funded by the Central Peter Ewin Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division, Biodiversity Survey Priorities Program. Logistics and Survey Planning All photographs are held by DEC. To obtain a Nathan Kearnes copy please contact the Bioregional Data Group Coordinator, DEC Hurstville Field Surveyors David Thomas Cover Photos Teresa James Nathan Kearnes Feature Photo (Daniel Connolly) Daniel Connolly White-striped Freetail-bat (Michael Todd), Rock Peter Ewin Plate-Heath Mallee (DEC) Black Crevice-skink (David O’Connor) Aerial Photo Interpretation Tall Moist Blue Gum Forest (DEC) Ian Roberts (Nattai and Bargo, this report; Rainforest (DEC) Woronora, 2003; Western Sydney, 1999) Short-beaked Echidna (D. O’Connor) Bob Wilson (Warragamba, 2003) Grey Gum (Daniel Connolly) Pintech (Pty Ltd) Red-crowned Toadlet (Dave Hunter) Data Analysis ISBN 07313 6851 7 Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly Report Writing and Map Production Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes the distribution and composition of the native vegetation within and immediately surrounding Nattai National Park, Nattai State Conservation Area and Bargo State Conservation Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining and Mapping Rare Vegetation Communities: Improving Techniques to Assist Land-Use Planning and Conservation
    Defining and mapping rare vegetation communities: improving techniques to assist land-use planning and conservation Stephen A. J. Bell BSc. (Hons) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Environmental and Life Sciences The University of Newcastle February 2013 Declaration Statement of Originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Statement of Collaboration I hereby certify that the concepts embodied in Chapter 2 of this thesis have been done in collaboration with a fellow researcher at this university. I have included as part of the thesis in Chapter 2 a statement clearly outlining the extent of collaboration with whom and under what auspices. Stephen A. J. Bell Preface “The vegetated landscape …. on first appearance presents a bewildering display of living matter, a higgledy-piggledy mass of trunks, leaves, branches, shrubs and grasses seemingly without form. The more observant may notice that the higgledy-piggledy mass varies from one place to another, that in some places there are trees as tall as large buildings while in other places there are no trees at all …. By the application of a systematic approach to viewing vegetation the bewildering display of plant life can take on new meaning thus altering one’s perception of what is being seen .… Suddenly the jumble of plant life reveals structures and beauties probably hitherto unseen”.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area Strategic Plan Addendum 2016
    Greater Blue Mountains World Heritage Area Strategic Plan Addendum 2016 © 2018 State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage With the exception of photographs, the State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) has compiled this report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to their specific needs. All content in this publication is owned by OEH and is protected by Crown Copyright, unless credited otherwise. It is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), subject to the exemptions contained in the licence. The legal code for the licence is available at Creative Commons. OEH asserts the right to be attributed as author of the original material in the following manner: © State of New South Wales and Office of Environment and Heritage 2018. Cover photograph: Kanangra Boyd National Park (Photo: Botanic Gardens Trust/Simone
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3 Section 5A Assessments “Seven Part Tests”
    APPENDIX 3 SECTION 5A ASSESSMENTS “SEVEN PART TESTS” Appendix 3: Seven Part Tests Swamp Sclerophyll Forest Swamp Sclerophyll Forest on Coastal Floodplains of the NSW North Coast, Sydney Basin and South East Corner bioregions is listed as an Endangered Ecological Community under the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act (1995). It is not listed under the schedules of the Commonwealth Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (1999). Swamp Sclerophyll Forest on Coastal Floodplains of the NSW North Coast, Sydney Basin and South East Corner bioregions includes and replaces Sydney Coastal Estuary Swamp Forest in the Sydney Basin bioregion Endangered Ecological Community. This community is associated with humic clay loams and sandy loams, on waterlogged or periodically inundated alluvial flats and drainage lines associated with coastal floodplains (NSW Scientific Committee 2011). It occurs typically as open forests to woodlands, although partial clearing may have reduced the canopy to scattered trees or scrub. The understorey may contain areas of fernland and tall reedland or sedgeland which in turn may also form mosaics with other floodplain communities and often fringe wetlands with semi-permanent standing water (NSW Scientific Committee 2011). Swamp Sclerophyll Forest on Coastal Floodplains generally occurs below 20 metres ASL, often on small floodplains or where the larger floodplains adjoin lithic substrates or coastal sand plains (NSW Scientific Committee 2011). The species composition of Swamp Sclerophyll Forest is primarily determined by the frequency and duration of waterlogging and the texture, salinity nutrient and moisture content of the soil. The species composition of the trees varies considerably, but the most widespread and abundant dominant trees include Eucalyptus robusta Swamp Mahogany, Melaleuca quinquenervia and, south from Sydney, Eucalyptus botryoides Bangalay and Eucalyptus longifolia Woollybutt (OEH 2015a).
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Or Threatened Vascular Plant Species of Wollemi National Park, Central Eastern New South Wales
    Rare or threatened vascular plant species of Wollemi National Park, central eastern New South Wales. Stephen A.J. Bell Eastcoast Flora Survey PO Box 216 Kotara Fair, NSW 2289, AUSTRALIA Abstract: Wollemi National Park (c. 32o 20’– 33o 30’S, 150o– 151oE), approximately 100 km north-west of Sydney, conserves over 500 000 ha of the Triassic sandstone environments of the Central Coast and Tablelands of New South Wales, and occupies approximately 25% of the Sydney Basin biogeographical region. 94 taxa of conservation signiicance have been recorded and Wollemi is recognised as an important reservoir of rare and uncommon plant taxa, conserving more than 20% of all listed threatened species for the Central Coast, Central Tablelands and Central Western Slopes botanical divisions. For a land area occupying only 0.05% of these divisions, Wollemi is of paramount importance in regional conservation. Surveys within Wollemi National Park over the last decade have recorded several new populations of signiicant vascular plant species, including some sizeable range extensions. This paper summarises the current status of all rare or threatened taxa, describes habitat and associated species for many of these and proposes IUCN (2001) codes for all, as well as suggesting revisions to current conservation risk codes for some species. For Wollemi National Park 37 species are currently listed as Endangered (15 species) or Vulnerable (22 species) under the New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. An additional 50 species are currently listed as nationally rare under the Briggs and Leigh (1996) classiication, or have been suggested as such by various workers. Seven species are awaiting further taxonomic investigation, including Eucalyptus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawkesbury River, Pittwater and Brisbane Water Regional Boatin Plan
    Transport for NSW Regional Boating Plan Hawkesbury River, Pittwater and Brisbane Water Region FebruaryJ 2015 Transport for NSW 18 Lee Street Chippendale NSW 2008 Postal address: PO Box K659 Haymarket NSW 1240 Internet: www.transport.nsw.gov.au Email: [email protected] ISBN Register: 978-1-922030-68-9 © COPYRIGHT STATE OF NSW THROUGH THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF TRANSPORT FOR NSW 2014 Extracts from this publication may be reproduced provided the source is fully acknowledged. Transport for NSW - Regional Boating Plan | i Table of contents 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Physical character of the waterways .............................................................................................. 6 2.1 Background .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Hawkesbury River and Nepean River .................................................................................. 7 2.3 Pittwater ............................................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Narrabeen Lagoon ............................................................................................................. 10 2.5 Brisbane Water .................................................................................................................. 10 3. Waterway users ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Darkiñung Précis: Hunter / Wollombi Ranges Aborigines
    Darkiñung Précis (2013): The Hunter / Wollombi Ranges Aborigines Darkiñung Précis [commonly written with English characters as ‘Darkinung’, Darkinyung or Darkinjung] The Original People from the Hunter River and Wollombi Ranges to the Coast: - The Aboriginal Identification from Colonial History G.E. Ford, 2013 This Precis has been prepared to address an emerging controversy about who were the traditional people from the NSW Central Coast to the Wollombi Ranges of the Hunter region to the north of Sydney when the British settlers arrived. A preceding 2013 Abstract outlined the historical situation for the northern Blue Mountains / Hawkesbury region to the west of Sydney. The Hunter region has become contested for claims of National Native Title based on federal legislation as mining companies vie to extract coal and gas from the ground while it is still permitted. While traditional owner descendants seek preservation of their ancestral heritage, other people claim compensation for this destruction of land. Here are the alternatives being considered since the release of 2010 “Darkiñung Recognition”, with analyses of historical records. The findings are conclusive. Entries here are in time order. ! In the early 1800s young Ben Singleton from Kurrajong had been exploring the ranges north of the Hawkesbury River with local Aborigines. This concluded with a March 1820 expedition commissioned by Gov. Macquarie, which reached the tidal limit of the Hunter River within their territory at present day Maitland. Macquarie had named this location Wallis Plains on his July 1818 visit by boat, and there were already settlers there when he returned November 1821. When the penal settlement established 1804 on the “Coal” river at Gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Sendle Zones
    Suburb Suburb Postcode State Zone Cowan 2081 NSW Cowan 2081 NSW Remote Berowra Creek 2082 NSW Berowra Creek 2082 NSW Remote Bar Point 2083 NSW Bar Point 2083 NSW Remote Cheero Point 2083 NSW Cheero Point 2083 NSW Remote Cogra Bay 2083 NSW Cogra Bay 2083 NSW Remote Milsons Passage 2083 NSW Milsons Passage 2083 NSW Remote Cottage Point 2084 NSW Cottage Point 2084 NSW Remote Mccarrs Creek 2105 NSW Mccarrs Creek 2105 NSW Remote Elvina Bay 2105 NSW Elvina Bay 2105 NSW Remote Lovett Bay 2105 NSW Lovett Bay 2105 NSW Remote Morning Bay 2105 NSW Morning Bay 2105 NSW Remote Scotland Island 2105 NSW Scotland Island 2105 NSW Remote Coasters Retreat 2108 NSW Coasters Retreat 2108 NSW Remote Currawong Beach 2108 NSW Currawong Beach 2108 NSW Remote Canoelands 2157 NSW Canoelands 2157 NSW Remote Forest Glen 2157 NSW Forest Glen 2157 NSW Remote Fiddletown 2159 NSW Fiddletown 2159 NSW Remote Bundeena 2230 NSW Bundeena 2230 NSW Remote Maianbar 2230 NSW Maianbar 2230 NSW Remote Audley 2232 NSW Audley 2232 NSW Remote Greengrove 2250 NSW Greengrove 2250 NSW Remote Mooney Mooney Creek 2250 NSWMooney Mooney Creek 2250 NSW Remote Ten Mile Hollow 2250 NSW Ten Mile Hollow 2250 NSW Remote Frazer Park 2259 NSW Frazer Park 2259 NSW Remote Martinsville 2265 NSW Martinsville 2265 NSW Remote Dangar 2309 NSW Dangar 2309 NSW Remote Allynbrook 2311 NSW Allynbrook 2311 NSW Remote Bingleburra 2311 NSW Bingleburra 2311 NSW Remote Carrabolla 2311 NSW Carrabolla 2311 NSW Remote East Gresford 2311 NSW East Gresford 2311 NSW Remote Eccleston 2311 NSW Eccleston 2311 NSW Remote
    [Show full text]
  • Gosford City Flood Emergency Sub Plan
    Gosford City GOSFORD CITY FLOOD EMERGENCY SUB PLAN A Sub-Plan of the Gosford City Local Emergency Management Plan (EMPLAN) Volume 1 of the Gosford City Local Flood Plan Gosford City Local Flood Plan AUTHORISATION The Gosford City Flood Emergency Sub Plan is a sub plan of the Gosford City Local Emergency Management Plan (EMPLAN). It has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the State Emergency Service Act 1989 (NSW) and is authorised by the Local Emergency Management Committee in accordance with the provisions of the State Emergency and Rescue Management Act 1989 (NSW). February 2014 Vol 1: Gosford City Flood Emergency Sub Plan Page i Gosford City Local Flood Plan CONTENTS AUTHORISATION .............................................................................................................................................. i CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................................... iii DISTRIBUTION LIST ......................................................................................................................................... iv VERSION HISTORY ............................................................................................................................................ v AMENDMENT LIST ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 03 Agency Responses
    03 Agency Responses CONTENTS Submission Summary & Responses Civil Aviation Safety Authority Darkinjung Local Aboriginal Land Council Department of Industry (Crown Lands) Department of Industry (Water) Department of Planning & Environment Department of Primary Industries (Agriculture) Department of Primary Industries (Fisheries) Forestry Corporation of NSW National Parks and Wildlife Services Office of Environment and Heritage Office of Environment and Heritage (Heritage Branch) Resources and Geoscience Roads and Martime Services Rural Fire Service Subsidence Advisory NSW Transport for NSW Agency Consultation Submission Summary & Responses Agency Issue Response Commonwealth No response received N/A Department of Environment Central Coast Councils area of Noted responsibility does not incorporate any Civil Aviation certified or registered aerodromes and Safety Authority therefore CASA has not comment on CCLEP. The CCLEP does not acknowledge the The Draft CCLEP based on the Standard Aboriginal Cultural Landscape & fails to Instrument LEP and as a consolidation of address the requirements of the the current WLEP 2013 and GLEP 2014. proposed future State legislation Any amendments a result of the final (Aboriginal Culture and Heritage Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Bill will be Reforms). made to the Standard Instrument LEP or further considered by the Comprehensive LEP. Culturally sensitive areas are incorrectly The timing and scope of works for the mapped in the Somersby Industrial Consolidated LEP does not allow for an Estate. archaeological study /ground truthing to be undertaken. Until this is resolved, any DA in the locality should be inclusive of a search of OEH is currently undertaking work with the Aboriginal Heritage Investigation Darkinjung to identify culturally Management System (AHIMS). Further significant sites.
    [Show full text]