DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report of Meeting 97 Report of Meeting SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON ANTARCTIC RESEARCH WORKING GROUP ON BIOLOGY BIRD BIOLOGY SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES OF MEETING, 9–13 JUNE 2002, JENA, GERMANY 1. WELCOME AND APOLOGIES 3.2 The conservation status of the Southern Ocean islands Members and observers were welcomed to the meeting by the The meeting heard reports from members and observers of Chair, Dr E.J. Woehler. Apologies had been received from Drs improved conservation status for a number of southern islands, J.P. Croxall, G. Robertson and H. Weimerskirch and Lic N. Coria. both through legislation and by successful attempts to remove The Chair noted the resignation of Dr L.S. Davis from the Sub- alien predators. In terms of legislation, it was noted that South committee, and thanked him for his past services. Africa intended to submit the Prince Edward Islands to the World Heritage Convention in 2004 (and that a nomination text had been prepared). A proposal for the Inaccessible Island Nature Reserve 2. ADOPTION OF AGENDA AND APPOINTMENT OF (Tristan da Cunha group) to be included within the Gough Island RAPPORTEURS World Heritage Site was being considered by the UK authorities after receiving the approval of the Tristan da Cunha Government. The draft agenda was adopted (Doc. 1). Attendees are listed in Management plans for South Georgia and Inaccessible Island Annex 1, and the documents tabled in Annex 2. Mr J. Cooper and were adopted and published in 2000 and 2001, respectively. It was Ms D.L. Patterson were appointed rapporteurs. noted that existing management plans were under review for Heard and McDonald Islands (Australia), Gough Island (UK) and the Prince Edward Islands (South Africa). 3. MATTERS ARISING FROM THE TOKYO MEETING, 2000 Practical measures to increase island conservation status had been undertaken by Australia (the apparent successful removal of feral The minutes of the previous meeting, held in Tokyo, Japan, in July Domestic Cats Felis catus from Macquarie Island by a number of 2000 had been circulated and published intersessionally (Marine combined measures, with an ensuing return in 2000 of the Grey Ornithology 28: 191–202, 2000, www.marineornithology.org) Petrel Procellaria cinerea as a breeding species for the first time and were adopted (Doc. 2). since the 1890s) and by New Zealand (apparent removal of Nor- wegian or Brown Rats Rattus norvegicus from Campbell Island 3.1 Central Data Bank for Antarctic Bird Banding by the aerial dropping of poisoned bait in 2001, a notable achieve- ment on a 11 000-ha island). Norwegian Rats had been removed Mr J. Cooper reported that the South African Bird Ringing Unit by the hand-broadcasting of poisoned bait from 30-ha Grass (SAFRING) had received the sum of US$ 1000 from SCAR to Island, South Georgia in November 2000 by the Government of manage the Central Data Bank (CDB) for Antarctic Bird Banding South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, with support from for the period 2001–2002. SAFRING had continued to house the the Department of Conservation, New Zealand. Norwegian Rats records of the CDB, but apparently had not made the annual had also been removed by hand-broadcasting poisoned bait from requests for information requested by the Subcommittee at its last four small islands in the Falkland Islands by Falklands Conserva- (and previous) meetings (Doc. 2). Presumably largely as a conse- tion in 2001. Additional islands are planned to be treated in the quence, primary banding data was reported by SAFRING as being future. received only from the United Kingdom (British Antarctic Survey) during the last two years. It was agreed that the CDB was not func- 3.3 Recent publications on Antarctic and sub-Antarctic birds tioning in the way originally envisaged by the Subcommittee. The compilations produced by Ms C.M. Phillips, British Antarc- After discussion, the Subcommittee considered that rather than tic Survey (BAS) Librarian, for 1998 and 1999 were tabled (Docs continuing to sponsor a CDB as such, it should keep a directory 3 & 4). It was noted that these were soon to be published electroni- of contact persons and national offices for each national and/or cally in Marine Ornithology (2001, 29: 97–101, 103–107, Antarctic banding programme from where information could be www.marineornithology.org) and would thereafter be published requested when marked (including colour-marked) birds could not in the paper version of the journal. A draft compilation for 2000 be identified. Such a directory could be a web-based one, possi- by Ms Phillips was tabled (Doc. 5). Members and observers were bly housed at the Australian Antarctic Data Centre. The Chair requested to submit their additions and corrections directly to Ms agreed to explore this option intersessionally. Phillips ([email protected]) as soon as possible, so that the 2000 list could be published in Marine Ornithology in 2002. Dr S Loparev gave a summary of Ukrainian banding efforts in Antarctica over the period 1998 to 2002, and will supply the address of the Ringing Centre in Kiev, Ukraine to the Subcommit- tee after the meeting. Marine Ornithology 30: 97–106 (2002) 98 Meeting report 3.4 Guidelines for approaching Antarctic and sub-Antarctic in 2001 in Rome, Italy had heard reports from member nations on seabirds, including aircraft operations their progress implementing the International Plan of Action for Reducing Seabird Mortality from Longline Fishing (IPOA- The Chair tabled a summary of minimum approach distances to Seabirds). Currently, Japan, New Zealand and the USA had wildlife adopted by the Australian Antarctic Division (Doc. 6). developed their National Plans of Action, with NPOA-Seabirds The Subcommittee noted that several Antarctic research pro- being developed or planned for Australia, Brazil, Falkland Islands grammes, as well as the International Association of Antarctic and South Africa. Tour Operators (IAATO), had developed individual guidelines for approaching wildlife within the Antarctic Treaty (AT) area (e.g. The Subcommittee noted the intention of Australia to submit the by Germany, Doc. 7). The Chair outlined concerns regarding dis- two species of toothfish to Appendix II of CITES (the Convention crepancies between national programmes for minimum approach on International Trade in Endangered Species of Flora and Fauna) distances to wildlife, especially when considering that more than at its November 2002 Conference of Parties (Doc. 10). If adopted, 15 000 tourists are likely to visit the AT area on an annual basis. such a listing would effectively extend CCAMLR’s CDS to a The resulting discussion centred on the need for more long-term much larger group of countries, further controlling pirate fishing demographic data on potential human impacts on wildlife and the and reducing seabird bycatch. The Subcommittee also noted with possibility that due to regional differences in visitation patterns approval that Antarctic tourist vessels were collecting donations and wildlife behaviour, a standardized set of guidelines may not from passengers to fund research into seabird/longline fisheries be applicable. problems, and that first call for fund applications had recently been made to an advisory panel that included two current members of The Subcommittee considered that the broader issue of human– the Subcommittee. wildlife interactions was of great importance within the SCAR area of interest. The Subcommittee thus agreed to continue the consideration of approach distance guidelines for wildlife, with 5. SPECIES COMPILATIONS consideration to locality and prior site management. Tourism, especially on the Antarctic Peninsula, represents the majority of 5.1 Giant petrels Macronectes spp. human presence during the summer breeding season. A revised ms was to be submitted for publication to Marine The Subcommittee decided that a workshop examining the Ornithology by the Chair. The figures would be produced at the broader aspects of human-seabird interactions was appropriate, Australian Antarctic Division. and that topics to be examined would include researcher–wildlife interactions, building from the workshop held on this topic in the 5.2 Storm petrels USA in 1993 (Fraser, W.R. & Trivelpiece, W.Z. (Eds). 1994. Report on [the] Workshop on Researcher–Seabird Interactions. A document summarizing the distribution and abundance of Wil- Washington, D.C.: Office of Polar Programs, NSF). It was decided son’s and Black-bellied Storm Petrels Oceanites oceanicus and to hold this workshop in association with the 3rd International Fregetta tropica was tabled by Drs P. Quillfeldt and H-U. Peter, Conference on Albatrosses and Petrels, and the 5th International who had taken over responsibility for the compilation from Dr M. Penguin Conference, both of which will be held in South America Sallaberry intersessionally (Doc. 11). This document required in late 2004. updating with new data recently received. Members and observ- ers were requested to submit new (including unpublished) infor- mation and methodology used to Drs Quillfeldt and Peter as soon 4. SEABIRD–FISHERIES INTERACTIONS as possible, using the Antarctic Gazetteer for names and co- ordinates of localities, so that the ms could be completed and sub- Mr J. Cooper summarized developments of note in the last two mitted for publication. Both quantitative and non-quantitative years. BirdLife International continued to run its Save the Alba- information was needed. Information would be sent by Drs I. tross Campaign to reduce seabird mortality from longline fishing Chupin and E.J. Woehler. An appeal for information would be (Doc. 8). Two BirdLife partners had held a South American work- made on the Seabird Listserver. shop on the issue in September 2001 in Uruguay (Doc. 9) and a similar workshop had been held in Asia later that year. The Work- Dr W.R. Fraser reported his view that numbers of Wilson’s Storm ing Group on Incidental Mortality Arising from Fishing (WG- Petrels were decreasing in the vicinity of Palmer Station, Anvers IMAF) of the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Island, Antarctic Peninsula.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JOURNAL Number Six
    THE JAMES CAIRD SOCIETY JOURNAL Number Six Antarctic Exploration Sir Ernest Shackleton MARCH 2012 1 Shackleton and a friend (Oliver Locker Lampson) in Cromer, c.1910. Image courtesy of Cromer Museum. 2 The James Caird Society Journal – Number Six March 2012 The Centennial season has arrived. Having celebrated Shackleton’s British Antarctic (Nimrod) Expedition, courtesy of the ‘Matrix Shackleton Centenary Expedition’, in 2008/9, we now turn our attention to the events of 1910/12. This was a period when 3 very extraordinary and ambitious men (Amundsen, Scott and Mawson) headed south, to a mixture of acclaim and tragedy. A little later (in 2014) we will be celebrating Sir Ernest’s ‘crowning glory’ –the Centenary of the Imperial Trans-Antarctic (Endurance) Expedition 1914/17. Shackleton failed in his main objective (to be the first to cross from one side of Antarctica to the other). He even failed to commence his land journey from the Weddell Sea coast to Ross Island. However, the rescue of his entire team from the ice and extreme cold (made possible by the remarkable voyage of the James Caird and the first crossing of South Georgia’s interior) was a remarkable feat and is the reason why most of us revere our polar hero and choose to be members of this Society. For all the alleged shenanigans between Scott and Shackleton, it would be a travesty if ‘Number Six’ failed to honour Captain Scott’s remarkable achievements - in particular, the important geographical and scientific work carried out on the Discovery and Terra Nova expeditions (1901-3 and 1910-12 respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • South Georgia Andrew Clarke, John P
    Important Bird Areas South Georgia Andrew Clarke, John P. Croxall, Sally Poncet, Anthony R. Martin and Robert Burton n o s r a e P e c u r B South Georgia from the sea; a typical first view of the island. Abstract The mountainous island of South Georgia, situated in the cold but productive waters of the Southern Ocean, is a UK Overseas Territory and one of the world’s most important seabird islands. It is estimated that over 100 million seabirds are based there, while there may have been an order of magnitude more before the introduction of rats. South Georgia has 29 species of breeding bird, and is the world’s most important breeding site for six species (Macaroni Penguin Eudyptes chrysolophus , Grey-headed Albatross Thalassarche chrysostoma , Northern Giant Petrel Macronectes halli , Antarctic Prion Pachyptila desolata , White-chinned Petrel Procellaria aequinoctialis and Common Diving Petrel Pelecanoides urinatrix ). Several of the key species are globally threatened or near-threatened, which emphasises the need for action to improve the conservation status of the island’s birds. South Georgia is currently classified by BirdLife International as a single Important Bird Area (IBA) but it may be better considered as comprising several distinct IBAs. Current threats to the South Georgia avifauna include rats (a major campaign to eliminate rats began in 2010/11), regional climate change, and incidental mortality in longline and trawl fisheries. Local fisheries are now well regulated but South Georgia albatrosses and petrels are still killed in large numbers in more distant fisheries. 118 © British Birds 105 • March 2012 • 118 –144 South Georgia This paper is dedicated to the memory of Peter Prince (1948–1998), who worked on South Georgia from 1971.
    [Show full text]
  • Prion Island Boardwalk IEE 1
    Initial Environmental Evaluation for Proposed Installation of a Boardwalk on Prion Island, South Georgia Prepared for the Government of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands by Dr Liz Pasteur CONTENTS Non-technical summary..................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................5 1.1 Purpose ...........................................................................................................................5 1.2 Legislation ......................................................................................................................5 1.2.1 South Georgia legislation .......................................................................................5 1.2.2 International treaties ...............................................................................................6 1.3 Background and consultation with stakeholders ............................................................6 1.4 Visitor management at Prion Island ...............................................................................6 1.4.1 Description of current route taken by visitors ........................................................7 1.5 Boardwalk research ........................................................................................................8 1.6 Project management structure.........................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Publications and Books
    Sally Poncet Peer-reviewed scientific publications Poncet, S., A. Wolfaardt, C. Barbraud, C., R. Reyes-Arriagada, A. Black, R.B. Powell and R.A. Phillips (2020) The distribution, abundance, status and global importance of giant petrels (Macronectes giganteus and M. halli) breeding at South Georgia. Polar Biology 43: 17-34. Floyd, K., K. Passfield, S. Poncet, B. Myer and J. Lee (2019) Persistence, Accuracy and Timeliness: finding, mapping and managing non-native plant species on the island of South Georgia. Pp 424-429 in: Veitch, C.R., M.N. Clout, A.R. Martin, J.C. Russell and C.J. West (Eds.) Island invasives: scaling up to meet the challenge. Occasional Paper SSC no. 62. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Poncet, S., K. Passfield, A. Kuepfer and M.A. Tabak (2018) The effect of Norway rats on coastal waterbirds of the Falklands Islands: a preliminary analysis. Pp 147-153 in: Veitch, C.R., M.N. Clout, A.R. Martin, J.C. Russell and C.J. West (Eds.) Island invasives: scaling up to meet the challenge. Occasional Paper SSC no. 62. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Pütz, K., S. Harris, N. Ratcliffe, A. Raya Rey, S. Poncet and B. Lüthi (2018) Behavioural plasticity in the foraging behaviour of male Southern Rockhopper Penguins (Eudyptes C. chrysocome) during incubation in the Falkland/Malvinas Islands. Polar Biology 41: 1801-1814. Jones, H.P., N.D. Holmes, S.H.M. Butchart, B.R. Tershy, P.J. Kappes, I. Corkery, A. Aguirre-Munoz, D.P. Armstrong, E. Bonnaud, A.A. Burbidge, K. Campbell, F. Courchamp, P.E. Cowan, R.J. Cuthbert, S.
    [Show full text]
  • South Shetland Islands and the Antarctic Peninsula
    RCC PILOTAGE FOUNDATION www.rccpf.org.uk SOUTH SHETLAND ISLANDS PETE HILL ©RCC Pilotage Foundation 2004 AND THE ANTARCTIC PENINSULA NOËL MARSHALL ©RCC Pilotage Foundation 2007 The RCC Pilotage Foundation is grateful to Pete Hill and Noël Marshall for describing their experiences during cruises to these waters. These separate accounts overlap in the Shetland Islands. This can best be seen in the Contents page of this interactive publication. Caution These notes have been prepared by the authors on the basis of the information they were able to obtain in the course of their indidual visits to the areas described. In particular, soundings shown reflect the route taken by the author and the absence of soundings does not indicate that depths are necessarily safe. The notes are in no way comprehensive and refer only to the conditions encountered at the time of the visits. Any plans are simply sketches and do not represent the results of a survey of the places referred to. They should be used with extreme caution. The RCC Pilotage Foundation and the authors have published these notes in the hope that they may be of some help to mariners but the safety of a vessel depends ultimately on the judgment of the skipper who should assess all information, published or unpublished. To the extent permitted by law, the RCC Pilotage Foundation and the authors do not accept liability for any loss and/or damage howsoever caused that may arise from reliance on information contained in these pages. CONTENTS To view the area in Google Maps, click pin PETE HILL
    [Show full text]
  • Selected References and Pertinent Literature Acknowledgements
    South Georgia-plan for progress 9/27/06 5:55 PM Page 74 Selected references and pertinent literature Agnew, D.J. (2004). Fishing South. The History and Management of South Georgia Fisheries. Penna Press, St Albans. Basberg, B. (2004). The Shore Whaling Stations at South Georgia. A Study in Antarctic Industrial Archaeology. Novus Forlag, Oslo. Frenot, Y., Chown, S.L., Whinam, J., Selkirk, P.M., Convey, P., Skotniki, M. and Bergstrom, D.M. (2005). Biological Invasions in the Antarctic: Extent, Impacts and Implications. Biololgical Review, 80 (45-72). Gordon, T. (2004). Whaling Thoughts Recalled. ‘A Way of Life’. Nevisprint Ltd., Fort William. Hart, I. (2001). Pesca. A History of the Pioneer Modern Whaling Company in the Antarctic. Aidan Ellis, Henley-on-Thames. Headland, R.K (1984). The Island of South Georgia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. McIntosh, E. and Walton, D.W.H. (2000). Environmental Management Plan for South Georgia. Cambridge: British Antarctic Survey, for the Government of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands. Poncet, S., McFadden, I. and Cox, A. (2002). Rat Eradication - South Georgia. Department of Conservation, New Zealand. Report to the Government of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands. Poncet, S. (2003). South Georgia Environmental Baseline Survey. South Georgia land and Visitor Management Report. Technical Report No. EBS03/2. Report to the Government of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands. Poncet, S. (2004). Report on the distribution, abundance and population trends of wandering, black- browed and grey-headed albatrosses at South Georgia 2003-2004. South Georgia Surveys, Stanley. Poncet, S. and Crosbie, K. (2005). A Visitor’s Guide to South Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • SGS Albatross and Prion Islands Monitoring Programme 2010 Report
    SGS Albatross and Prion Islands Monitoring Programme 2010 Annual Report Visitors on the boardwalk at Prion Island, January 2010 Prepared by Sally Poncet, South Georgia Surveys 2nd December 2010 Acknowledgement s • Ken Passfield (South Georgia Surveys co-researcher) for assisting with the 2009/10 season’s logistical preparations, fieldwork on Albatross and Prion Islands and post- survey data entry. • Jon Ashburner, Paula O'Sullivan and Richard Inman (British Antarctic Survey) for carrying out the September counts. • Dion Poncet and Celine Blanchard of SV Golden Fleece for logistical support. • Captains and crew of FPV Pharos SG for logistical support. • South Georgia Government, The Antarctic Research Trust and The Poles Apart Fund for financial support for this project. Correspondence : Sally Poncet, e-mail [email protected] tel +500 21826 Citation : Poncet, S. 2010. SGS Albatross and Prion Islands Monitoring Programme 2010 Report. South Georgia Surveys unpublished report, Stanley. Cover photo – Nest #17, 4.5 metres from the end of the lowest viewing platform on Prion Island, 11 January 2010. Summary 2010 was the 12 th year of the annual seabird and habitat monitoring programme on Albatross and Prion Islands. The research is managed by South Georgia Surveys (SGS), a Falkland Islands-based research group. Collaboration with the South Georgia Government (GSGSSI) began in 2008 and is due for review at the end of 2010. Funding for the programme is currently provided by the Government of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, with additional funds from the “Protect Our Poles” Fund (administered by the Calgary Zoological Society) and The Antarctic Research Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Induced Seabird Mortality on Vessels Operating in the Southern
    Antarctic Science 17 (1): 67–68 (2005) © Antarctic Science Ltd Printed in the UK DOI: 10.1017/S0954102005002439 Short Note Light induced seabird mortality on vessels operating in the Southern Ocean: incidents and mitigation measures ANDY BLACK Falklands Conservation, PO Box 26, Stanley, Falkland Islands, FIQQ 1ZZ [email protected] Received 19 May 2004, accepted 3 August 2004 Introduction the almost 900 birds collected 215 were dead (Table I). It is recognized that birds become disorientated at night in Death was thought to be either directly due to collisions the presence of artificial light (Bruderer et al. 1999). Bird with the ship or to a combination of hypothermia and strikes on vessels operating in the southern oceans have drowning, following prolonged immersion in water-filled long been known (Ryan 1991), but few data have been cavities on deck. Virtually all of those still alive were in a published concerning these events. In the Southern Ocean waterlogged state and were collected in cardboard fish the Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine boxes to dry and recondition their feathers. Boxes were Living Resources (CCAMLR) stipulates that, during fishing stored in a dry yet unheated area of the factory deck, and operations, deck lighting should be kept to a minimum and once in captivity very few birds died. Over the following be directed inboard and downward (CCAMLR 2003, hours, 684 birds were released alive (Table I). Nine species measures 25-02 and 25-03). However, these measures are were recorded during this bird strike; blue petrel Halobaena designed to keep birds away from fishing gear rather than caerulea (Gmelin), Antarctic prion Pachyptila desolata prevent bird strikes.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaver Island Group Restoration Project
    to the island’s status as a World Heritage Site. By placing a team on Gough for one year this project will resolve key This project will place a two-person team on Gough Island for one issues identified by OTEP project TDC 203, allow the continuation year. Four key objectives will be met: of OTEP project TDC 403 at a critical point in the control of Sagina, repeat long-term monitoring of bird populations as supported by the 1. to undertake the key research necessary to determine the best UK FCO, and complete key research activities previously supported approach for a mouse eradication; by the RSPB and University of Cape Town. Through utilising the 2. to continue with the containment and eradication of Sagina; South African National Antarctic Programme supply vessel the S.A. 3. to repeat long-term monitoring of Gough’s breeding bird Agulhas to access and undertake work on Gough, the project will not populations to assess trends and the impact of current threats; impact on berth requirements for Tristan da Cunha, or necessitate 4. to continue demographic research on the Tristan Albatross and the expense of chartering a dedicated vessel. Gough Bunting to determine the impact of mouse predation on these Dr Richard Cuthbert, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire, SG19 2DL, two Critically Endangered species. UK, Tel: +44 1767 693085; Fax:+44 1767 685079, Email: richard. [email protected] Summaries of progress or completion for a range of OTEP projects already active Scoping Study for GSPC Targets 1 & 2 in the Caribbean (CAY402) The Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC), adopted by the Convention on Biological Diversity, outlines sixteen targets towards halting the current and continuing loss of botanical diversity worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • South Georgia & Antarctic Odyssey
    Expedition Notes SOUTH GEORGIA & ANTARCTIC ODYSSEY CHILE Atlantic Ocean Stanley ARGENTINA From Welcome! Santiago Falkland Islands/ Malvinas Punta Arenas Ushuaia South Thank you for choosing Aurora Expeditions for your voyage to the Georgia Puerto Williams Island Falkland Islands/Malvinas, South Georgia & Antarctica! Drake Passage These notes have been designed to help you prepare for your upcoming King Elephant South George Island Orkney expedition and what you are likely to experience. Our emphasis is on Island Islands Livingston Island lands unique wildlife encounters, exploring pristine landscapes, visiting sites nd Is etla Sh uth So of historical and scientific significance. Your safety is our priority, closely Deception Island Weddell followed by showing you the best Antarctic experience possible! Sea Lemaire ANTARCTIC Please remember that the enclosed itinerary is merely a guide. All of our Channel PENINSULA ANTARC TIC CI RCLE voyages are expeditionary, which means no two voyages are ever the same and there is always an element of the unexpected. Our itineraries will vary due to weather and sea conditions, as well as to take advantage Voyage Code: ASG68 of spontaneous opportunities and impromptu wildlife displays. Dates: 21 January to 7 February 2017 Please take the time to read this pre-departure information prior to Duration: 17 nights / 18 days departing for your voyage. If you have any further questions or wish to Embark: Santiago OR Punta Arenas, Chile book flights, accommodation, tours and transfers not included with the Disembark: Punta Arenas, Chile voyage, please do not hesitate to contact your dedicated Reservations Ship: Polar Pioneer Consultant or your travel agent.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Reading
    Antarctica RECOMMENDED READING This is a detailed list of reference books about Antarctica. You are not expected to read all, or indeed any of them. Some may be difficult to find, but you could ask your local library or local book shop toelp h and most are available on Amazon as well as in our onboard ship’s library. Biographies Endurance – Caroline Alexander Scott of the Antarctic – David Crane In August 1914, Sir Ernest Shackleton and a crew of 27 set sail This is the definitive biography of Captain Scott – the pivotal aboard the Endurance bound for the South Atlantic. Their goal figure in pre-First World War Antarctic exploration. Crane’s was to be the first men to cross Antarctica. beautifully written and illustrated book re-examines the courage. Worst Journey in the World – Apsley Cherry-Garrard Captain Scott – Ranulph Fiennes One of the youngest members of Scott’s team, Apsley Sir Ranulph Fiennes is uniquely qualified to write a new biography Cherry-Garrard was later part of the rescue party that eventually of Captain Scott. This is the first biography of Scott by someone found the frozen bodies of Scott and three men who had who has experienced the deprivations. accompanied him. Mawson – Philip Ayres Scott’s Last Expedition – Robert Falcon Scott In the heroic age of polar exploration, Sir Douglas Mawson stands Captain Robert Falcon Scott (1868-1912) led two expeditions to the in first rank. In this biography Mawson’s many achievements are Antarctic, the first in the Discovery (1900-04) and the second (1910- illuminated, which enabled us to understand the human side.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Rule on Environmental Impact Assessment of Nongovernmental Activities in Antarctica
    Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Rule on Environmental Impact Assessment of Nongovernmental Activities in Antarctica August 2001 United States Office of Environmental Federal Activities Protection Agency FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT for the Proposed Rule on Environmental Impact Assessment of Nongovernmental Activities in Antarctica Please send comments on this FEIS to either: B. Katherine Biggs Joseph Montgomery EPA, Office of Federal Activities EPA, Office of Federal Activities 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. (MC 2252A) 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. (MC 2252A) Washington, D.C. 20460 Washington, D.C. 20460 PH: (202) 564-7144 PH: (202) 564-7157 Fax:(202) 564-0072 Fax: (202) 564-0072 August 2001 Abstract Abstract Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Rule on Environmental Impact Assessment of Nongovernmental Activities in Antarctica Abstract The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to promulgate final regulations that provide for assessment of the potential environmental impacts of nongovernmental activities in Antarctica and for coordination of the review of information regarding environmental impact assessments (EIAs) received from other Parties under the Protocol on Environmental Protection (the Protocol) to the Antarctic Treaty of 1959 (the Treaty). The final rule will be promulgated as required by Public Law 104-227, the Antarctic Science, Tourism, and Conservation Act of 1998, 16 U.S.C. 2401 et seq., to provide for domestic implementation of the Protocol. The purpose of this Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is to summarize the analysis of the proposed alternatives for the final rule to be promulgated by EPA that will amend 40 CFR Part 8, Environmental Impact Assessment of Nongovernmental Activities in Antarctica.
    [Show full text]