The Eltanin Impact and Its Tsunami Along the Coast of South America: Insights for Potential Deposits

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Eltanin Impact and Its Tsunami Along the Coast of South America: Insights for Potential Deposits Earth and Planetary Science Letters 409 (2015) 175–181 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth and Planetary Science Letters www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl The Eltanin impact and its tsunami along the coast of South America: Insights for potential deposits Robert Weiss a, Patrick Lynett b, Kai Wünnemann c a Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, VA 24061, USA b Sonny Astani Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2531, USA c Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstrasse 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: The Eltanin impact occurred 2.15 million years ago in the Bellinghausen Sea in the southern Pacific. Received 21 June 2014 While a crater was not formed, evidence was left behind at the impact site to prove the impact origin. Received in revised form 10 October 2014 Previous studies suggest that a large tsunami formed, and sedimentary successions along the coast of Accepted 19 October 2014 South America have been attributed to the Eltanin impact tsunami. They are characterized by large clasts, Available online xxxx often several meters in diameter. Our state-of-the-art numerical modeling of the impact process and its Editor: J. Lynch-Stieglitz coupling with non-linear wave simulations allows for quantifying the initial wave characteristic and the Keywords: propagation of tsunami-like waves over large distances. We find that the tsunami attenuates quickly with −1.2 Eltanin impact η(r) ∝ r resulting in maximum wave heights similar to those observed during the 2004 Sumatra tsunamis and 2011 Tohoku-oki tsunamis. We compute a transport competence of the coastal flow and conclude tsunami modeling that for the northernmost alleged tsunami deposits, especially for those in Hornitos, Chile, the transport impact cratering competence is about two orders of magnitude too small to generate the observed deposits. numerical simulations © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction The Eltanin impact occurred about 2.15 million years ago in the Bellinghausen Sea, Antarctica. The black circle in Fig. 1 annotated with “E” marks the location of the Eltanin impact site. The Eltanin The Eltanin impact structure belongs to the group of very few impact did not produce a typical bowl-shaped impact crater. It only impacts that are proven to have hit the marine environment. The reworked the sea-bed substrate and produced chaotic layering of reason for this low number of known marine impact structures is the sediment, which was first recognized by Kyte et al. (1981). multifold. Wünnemann and Lange (2002) calculated a 50% chance Gersonde et al. (1997) also found spherules and the well-known for an impactor to hit the deep sea. For an impactor to leave a Iridium anomaly. The latter two are evidence of the impact, and trace at the ocean floor, the impactor also must have a certain the fact that a crater was not formed was used by Mader (1998), diameter or larger. The Eltanin impact itself can be taken as a Wünnemann and Lange (2002) and Shuvalov and Trubetskaya threshold diameter because the impact did not form a crater, but (2007) to constrain an impactor diameter. These three independent impact-cratering processes and the water flow created by water modeling efforts estimated the Eltanin impactor to be between displacement during the impact process generated indications to 0.7 km and 1km in diameter, assuming a Stony meteorite (ρi ≈ link this structure to an impact. However, the unequivocal evidence −3 2700 kg m ). However, in a more recent study (Shuvalov and Ger- for the impact origin is given by the finding of remnants of the im- sonde, 2014)estimated the projectile diameter to be between 1.5 pactor in drill cores. For much smaller impactors than the Eltanin ◦ and 2km for a vertical and a 45 impact angle, respectively. impactor, water waves would have of course been formed as well. On a large scale, the study published by Ward and Asphaug However, it remains to be seen if the water flow alone is violent (2002) is the only publication that considers the propagation and enough to leave behind specific indications to be recognized as an coastal effects of the tsunami generated by the Eltanin impact. impact; if the shock wave does not reach the sea floor, none of the The theoretical means that the authors employ to calculate the classical impact evidence, such as shock metamorphosed rocks or wave spreading forces the waves to attenuate proportionally to 1/r, mineral phases, will be generated. where r is the radial distance from the impact location. Classical shallow-water wave theory, utilized for describing the propagation of earthquake-generated tsunami waves, only includes geometri- E-mail address: [email protected] (R. Weiss). cal spreading, which means that the amplitude of the propagating http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.10.050 0012-821X/© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 176 R. Weiss et al. / Earth and Planetary Science Letters 409 (2015) 175–181 South American continent are sufficient to move the grain sizes of these proposed tsunami deposits. Our analysis is based on impact modeling with iSALE (Wünnemann et al., 2006), wave modeling with different wave theories (Lynett and Liu, 2002), and simple es- timates of critical shear stresses to see which grain sizes could be transported. 2. Eltanin tsunami deposits along the Chilean coast The development of western South America has long been gov- erned by subduction and plate tectonics. The subduction and as- sociated processes created a very complicated geologic situation which is recorded in sediments in the coastal area. However, these processes work on different time and length scales at different parts of the subduction zone, which results in poorly constrained correlations of sediments in different areas along the western coast of South America. The discussion about deposits that might be- long to the Eltanin impact tsunami is an excellent example of this uncertainty. There are five prominent locations at which the Eltanin impact tsunami allegedly left evidence of its presence be- hind. However, this evidence is often circumstantial and tainted by poor stratigraphic constraints. Going from north to south, Horni- tos is located at the Mijeones Peninsula (H in Fig. 1). The tsunami origin of the seven to ten-meter thick conglomerate bed was first Fig. 1. The rectangle projected on the sphere represents the computational domain. put forward by Hartley et al. (2001) and reiterated by Goff et al. The location of the Eltanin impact size is marked with E. The sites of potential (2012). This bed contains large (approximately 5m in diameter) tsunami deposits formed by the Eltanin impact tsunami are: H – Hornitos, C/BI – angular to very angular boulders that are situated in a matrix of Caldera and Bahia Inglesa, N – Navidad, and CO – Concepcion. SD and SD refer to x y poorly sorted fine to very coarse sandstone. The basal part of this the computational subdomains used for the wave modeling. There are 18 longitudi- nal and 17 latitudinal subdomains resulting 306 subdomains in our state-of-the-art, conglomerate has an erosional contact with the underlying strata. high-performance numerical simulations of the wave dynamics. The second deposit is at Caldera and Bahia Inglesa (C/BI in Fig. 1). The deposits at Caldera consist of a debris-flow deposit with mega- clasts. Also associated with this deposit are well-preserved whale Table 1 √ Wave amplitude η proportional to 1/ r, 1/r and 1/r2 for 10 km, 50 km, 100 km, skeletons, which is seen as evidence of long-standing water af- = = and 200 km distance from the impact center and an initial amplitude of η(r 0) ter the tsunami inundation of the Eltanin impact tsunami (Goff 100 m. et al., 2012). The potential tsunami deposits at Bahia Inglesa con- Distance sists of a 42-m thick silt and fine-grained sand stone. Associated 10 50 100 200 with the deposits is a bonebed that contains boulders up to 6m (km) (km) (km) (km) in diameter. The deposit in Navidad consists of clast-supported √ η ∝ 1/ r 31.6200 m 14.1400 m 10.0000 m 7.0700 m conglomerate with angular to subrounded clasts. The fossil assem- 1/r 10.0000 m 2.0000 m 0.5000 m 0.5000 m blage within this deposit indicates a mix of marine and terrestrial 2 1/r 1.0000 m 0.0400 m 0.0100 m 0.0025 m origin. This basal conglomerate is overlain by interbedded sand and mudstones as well as conglomerates. The southernmost po- wave decreases due to the larger area that the wave engulfs. This tential tsunami deposits can be found near Concepcion, where a coarse beach sandstone contains rip-up clasts made up of mud- leads√ to an attenuation of the individual waves proportional to stone. Rip-up clasts are often found in tsunami deposits, such as 1/ r. Whether or not the √difference in wave amplitudes η(x, t) is the deposits left behind by the 1998 tsunami in Papua New Guinea η(x, t) ∝ 1/r or η(x, t) ∝ 1/ r is enormous. Table 1 gives√ an exam- (Gelfenbaum and Jaffe, 2003). This potential tsunami deposit also ple how wave amplitudes changes proportional to 1/ r, 1/r and contains melted quartz and glass particles, which was taken as po- 1/r2. tential evidence of the Eltanin impact by Goff et al. (2012). Does the Eltanin impact generate a tsunami that attenuates − with η(x, t) ∝ 1/r or other q’s in η(x, t) ∝ r q.
Recommended publications
  • Early Fracturing and Impact Residue Emplacement: Can Modelling Help to Predict Their Location in Major Craters?
    Early fracturing and impact residue emplacement: Can modelling help to predict their location in major craters? Item Type Proceedings; text Authors Kearsley, A.; Graham, G.; McDonnell, T.; Bland, P.; Hough, R.; Helps, P. Citation Kearsley, A., Graham, G., McDonnell, T., Bland, P., Hough, R., & Helps, P. (2004). Early fracturing and impact residue emplacement: Can modelling help to predict their location in major craters?. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 39(2), 247-265. DOI 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00339.x Publisher The Meteoritical Society Journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science Rights Copyright © The Meteoritical Society Download date 23/09/2021 21:19:20 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/655802 Meteoritics & Planetary Science 39, Nr 2, 247–265 (2004) Abstract available online at http://meteoritics.org Early fracturing and impact residue emplacement: Can modelling help to predict their location in major craters? Anton KEARSLEY,1* Giles GRAHAM,2 Tony McDONNELL,3 Phil BLAND,4 Rob HOUGH,5 and Paul HELPS6 1Department of Mineralogy, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK 2Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, California, USA 3Planetary and Space Sciences Research Institute, The Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK 4Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK 5Museum of Western Australia, Francis Street, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia 6School of Earth Sciences and Geography, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey, KT1 2EE, UK *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 30 June 2003; revision accepted 15 December 2003) Abstract–Understanding the nature and composition of larger extraterrestrial bodies that may collide with the Earth is important.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Recovery of Ejecta Material from Confirmed, Probable
    Appendix A Recovery of Ejecta Material from Confirmed, Probable, or Possible Distal Ejecta Layers A.1 Introduction In this appendix we discuss the methods that we have used to recover and study ejecta found in various types of sediment and rock. The processes used to recover ejecta material vary with the degree of lithification. We thus discuss sample processing for unconsolidated, semiconsolidated, and consolidated material separately. The type of sediment or rock is also important as, for example, carbonate sediment or rock is processed differently from siliciclastic sediment or rock. The methods used to take and process samples will also vary according to the objectives of the study and the background of the investigator. We summarize below the methods that we have found useful in our studies of distal impact ejecta layers for those who are just beginning such studies. One of the authors (BPG) was trained as a marine geologist and the other (BMS) as a hard rock geologist. Our approaches to processing and studying impact ejecta differ accordingly. The methods used to recover ejecta from unconsolidated sediments have been successfully employed by BPG for more than 40 years. A.2 Taking and Handling Samples A.2.1 Introduction The size, number, and type of samples will depend on the objective of the study and nature of the sediment/rock, but there a few guidelines that should be followed regardless of the objective or rock type. All outcrops, especially those near industrialized areas or transportation routes (e.g., highways, train tracks) need to be cleaned off (i.e., the surface layer removed) prior to sampling.
    [Show full text]
  • ANIC IMPACTS: MS and IRONMENTAL P ONS Abstracts Edited by Rainer Gersonde and Alexander Deutsch
    ANIC IMPACTS: MS AND IRONMENTAL P ONS APRIL 15 - APRIL 17, 1999 Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research Bremerhaven, Germany Abstracts Edited by Rainer Gersonde and Alexander Deutsch Ber. Polarforsch. 343 (1999) ISSN 01 76 - 5027 Preface .......3 Acknowledgements .......6 Program ....... 7 Abstracts P. Agrinier, A. Deutsch, U. Schäre and I. Martinez: On the kinetics of reaction of CO, with hot Ca0 during impact events: An experimental study. .11 L. Ainsaar and M. Semidor: Long-term effect of the Kärdl impact crater (Hiiumaa, Estonia) On the middle Ordovician carbonate sedimentation. ......13 N. Artemieva and V.Shuvalov: Shock zones on the ocean floor - Numerical simulations. ......16 H. Bahlburg and P. Claeys: Tsunami deposit or not: The problem of interpreting the siliciclastic K/T sections in northeastern Mexico. ......19 R. Coccioni, D. Basso, H. Brinkhuis, S. Galeotti, S. Gardin, S. Monechi, E. Morettini, M. Renard, S. Spezzaferri, and M. van der Hoeven: Environmental perturbation following a late Eocene impact event: Evidence from the Massignano Section, Italy. ......21 I von Dalwigk and J. Ormö Formation of resurge gullies at impacts at sea: the Lockne crater, Sweden. ......24 J. Ebbing, P. Janle, J, Koulouris and B. Milkereit: Palaeotopography of the Chicxulub impact crater and implications for oceanic craters. .25 V. Feldman and S.Kotelnikov: The methods of shock pressure estimation in impacted rocks. ......28 J.-A. Flores, F. J. Sierro and R. Gersonde: Calcareous plankton stratigraphies from the "Eltanin" asteroid impact area: Strategies for geological and paleoceanographic reconstruction. ......29 M.V.Gerasimov, Y. P. Dikov, 0 . I. Yakovlev and F.Wlotzka: Experimental investigation of the role of water in the impact vaporization chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Eltanin Asteroid in Rise Peninsula, Site 1096'
    Barker, P.F., Camerlenghi, A., Acton, G.D., and Ramsay, A.T.S. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results Volume 178 9. DATAREPORT: A SEARCH FOR DEPOSITS OF THE LATE PLIOCENE IMPACT OF THE ELTANIN ASTEROIDIN RISE SEDIMENTS FROM THE ANTARCTIC PENINSULA,SITE 1096' Frank T. Kyte2 ABSTRACT Concentrations of Ir have been measured in 87 sediment samples from Ocean Drilling Program Site 1096 in search of evidence of fallout from the impact of the Eltanin asteroid, which occurred at 2.15 Ma, -1300 km northwest of the site. An additional six samples were mea- Kyte, F.T., 2001. Data report: A search sured from a unique sand layer and adjacent sediments that are dated at for deposits of the late Pliocene impact -1.6 Ma. These 93 sediment samples are all silts and muds that were de- of the Eltanin asteroid in rise posited on a continental rise drift of the Antarctic Peninsula. No evi- sediments from the Antarctic dence of the Eltanin impact deposit was found in this study. Peninsula, Site 1096. In Barker, P.F., Camerlenghi, A., Acton, G.D., and Ramsay, A.T.S. (Eds.), Proc. OD8 Sci. Results, 178, 1-6 [Online]. Available INTRODUCTION from World Wide Web: <http://www- odp.tamu.edu/publications/l78-SR/ One objective of the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Leg 178 expedi- VOLUME/CHAM'ERS/SRl78-09.PDF>. tion was to search for sediment deposits related to the late Pliocene im- [Cited YYYY-MM-DD] pact of the Eltanin asteroid. This is a unique deposit in the known ZCenter for Astrobiology, Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, sedimentary record.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Cratering: Bridging the Gap Between Modeling and Observations
    IMPA_ CRATERING: BRIDGING THE GAP B_EEN MODELING AND OBSERVATIONS IIllll ..................... ,, ,, ,,, ,,,,,,,, ,r, II I I II I Houston, T<xas -- F_bruary 7-9, 2003 Abstract Volume LPI LPI Contribution No. 1155 Impact Cratering: Bridging the Gap Between Modeling and Observations February 7-9, 2003 Houston, Texas Sponsor Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration Conveners Robert Herrick, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elisabetta Pierrazzo, Planetary Science Institute Scientific Organizing Committee Bevan French, Natural History Museum Kevin Housen, Boeing Corporation William McKinnon, Washington University Jay Melosh, University of Arizona Michael Zolensky, NASA Johnson Space Center Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113 LPI Contribution No. 1155 Compiled in 2003 by LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE The Institute is operated by the Universities Space Research Association under Agreement No. NCC5-679 issued through the Solar System Exploration Division of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this volume are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this volume may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, education, or personal research purposes; however, republication of any paper or portion thereof requires the written permission of the authors as well as the appropriate acknowledgment of this publication. Abstracts in this volume may be cited as Author A. B. (2003) Title of abstract. In Impact Cratering: Bridging the Gap Between Modeling and Observations, p. XX. LPI Contribution No. 1155, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston. This volume is distributed by ORDER DEPARTMENT Lunar and Planetary Institute 3600 Bay Area Boulevard Houston TX 77058-1113, USA Phone: 281-486-2172 Fax: 281-486-2186 E-mail: [email protected] Mail order requestors will be invoiced for the cost of shipping and handling.
    [Show full text]
  • A Search for Deposits of the Late Pliocene Impact of the Eltanin Asteroid in Rise Sediments from the Antarctic Peninsula, Site 10961
    Barker, P.F., Camerlenghi, A., Acton, G.D., and Ramsay, A.T.S. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results Volume 178 9. DATA REPORT: A SEARCH FOR DEPOSITS OF THE LATE PLIOCENE IMPACT OF THE ELTANIN ASTEROID IN RISE SEDIMENTS FROM THE ANTARCTIC PENINSULA, SITE 10961 Frank T. Kyte2 ABSTRACT Concentrations of Ir have been measured in 87 sediment samples from Ocean Drilling Program Site 1096 in search of evidence of fallout from the impact of the Eltanin asteroid, which occurred at 2.15 Ma, ~1300 km northwest of the site. An additional six samples were mea- 1Kyte, F.T., 2001. Data report: A search sured from a unique sand layer and adjacent sediments that are dated at for deposits of the late Pliocene impact ~1.6 Ma. These 93 sediment samples are all silts and muds that were de- of the Eltanin asteroid in rise posited on a continental rise drift of the Antarctic Peninsula. No evi- sediments from the Antarctic dence of the Eltanin impact deposit was found in this study. Peninsula, Site 1096. In Barker, P.F., Camerlenghi, A., Acton, G.D., and Ramsay, A.T.S. (Eds.), Proc. ODP, Sci. INTRODUCTION Results, 178, 1–6 [Online]. Available from World Wide Web: <http://www- odp.tamu.edu/publications/178_SR/ One objective of the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Leg 178 expedi- VOLUME/CHAPTERS/SR178_09.PDF>. tion was to search for sediment deposits related to the late Pliocene im- [Cited YYYY-MM-DD] 2 pact of the Eltanin asteroid. This is a unique deposit in the known Center for Astrobiology, Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, sedimentary record.
    [Show full text]
  • Ablation, 259, 260 Acid Rains, 217 Acoustic Gravity Waves, 148, 218
    INDEX Ablation, 259, 260 fluctuation, 348 Acid rains, 217 temperature, 348, 349 Acoustic gravity waves, 148, 218, 236 Atmospheric darkening, 207 Acoustic signals, 149 Atmospheric winds, 239 Acoustic system, 148 Auroral phenomena, 238 Active Geophysical Rocket Experiments, 328 Australasian strewn field, 272 Advective motion, 341 Australian-Asian tektites, 268 Aerial shock waves, 229 Australites, 267 Aerodynamic forces, 10 Air-blast, 16 Baikonur cosmodrome, 238 Alfven velocity, 314, 322 Ballistic motion, 270 Aluminium jet, 328 Barents Sea, 293 Alvarez, Luis, 1 Barium vapor streams, 325 ANEOS equation of state, 62, 269, 293 10Be, 271, 272 Angara River, 232 Benesov bolide, 135 Annealing of meteorite samples, 340 Bishop’s rings, 234 Annealing of minerals, 245 Block structure, 33 Anomalies of elements and isotopes Bodaibo, 232 in peat, 242 Bohemia, 273 Anomalous atmospheric phenomena, 235, 236 Bolides, 131 Antipodal point, 216, 217, 219 Bottom relief, 41 Apollo lunar samples, 268 Brazil, 228 Apparent strength, 145 Breakup, 9 Arago neutral polarization points, 234 Brightness, 233 Archean, 175, 187 Bronze Age, 228 Artificial air cloud, 328, 329 Buried explosions, 31, 56 Asteroidal hypothesis, 259 Butterfly-shaped tree fall pattern, 240 Asteroids, 120 2002 EM7, 5 99942 Apophis, 5 Carbon, 208 Eros, 61 Carbonaceous chondrites, 242, 243 Gaspra, 92 Carbonates terrestrial, 340, 346 Hermes, 5 Carbon isotopes 13C, 14C, 243 Ida, 92 Casualties, 19, 23 Itokawa, 57, 92 Cenomanian-Turonian boundary, 208 Mathilde, 7, 61, 92, 244 Central European tektite strewn
    [Show full text]
  • EGU05-A-02449 © European Geosciences Union 2005
    Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 7, 02449, 2005 SRef-ID: 1607-7962/gra/EGU05-A-02449 © European Geosciences Union 2005 The late Pliocene impact of the Eltanin asteroid into the Southern Ocean – Documentation and environmental consequences. R. Gersonde (1), F. T. Kyte (2), T. Frederichs (3), U. Bleil (3), H.-W. Schenke (1) and G. Kuhn (1) (1) Alfred Wegener Institut for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany (2) Center for Astrobiology, Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, USA(3) Earth Science Department, University of Bremen, Germany ( [email protected] / Phone +49-(0)471-4831-1203 / Fax +49-(0)471-4831-1923 The late Pliocene impact of the Eltanin asteroid is the only known impact in a deep- ocean (∼5 km) basin and was first discovered in 1981 as an Ir anomaly in sediment cores collected by the USNS Eltanin in 1965 [1]. In 1995 an expedition with RV Po- larstern we collected extensive bathymetric and seismic data sets as well as sediment cores from an area in the Bellingshausen Sea (Pacific Southern Ocean) that permitted the first comprehensive geoscientific documentation of an asteroid impact into a deep ocean (∼ 5 km) basin, named the Eltanin impact [2]. Further extensive survey and sampling followed during a second RV Polarstern expedition in 2001. Impact deposits are now available from a total of more than 20 sediment cores collected in an area covering about 80,000 km2. Sediment texture analyses and studies of sediment com- position including grain size and microfossil distribution reveal the pattern of impact- related sediment disturbance and the sedimentary processes immediately following the impact event.
    [Show full text]
  • IMPACTS: EJECTA EFFECTS 1:30 P.M
    Lunar and Planetary Science XXXVI (2005) sess15.pdf Tuesday, March 15, 2005 IMPACTS: EJECTA EFFECTS 1:30 p.m. Salon A Chairs: O. S. Barnouin-Jha F. T. Kyte 1:30 p.m. Barnouin-Jha O. S. * Cintala M. J. Crawford D. A. Impact into Coarse Grained Spheres [#1585] In this study, we use experimental techniques to report on how coarse grained targets might influence ejecta excavation and crater shape. 1:45 p.m. Yamamoto S. * Okabe N. Kadono T. Sugita S. Matsui T. Measurements of Ejecta Velocity Distribution by a High-Speed Video Camera [#1600] We performed impact experiments into glass sphere targets in order to measure the velocity distribution of ejecta with velocities ranging from a few to tens of m/s. 2:00 p.m. Schönian F. * Tagle R. Stöffler D. Kenkmann T. Geology of Southern Quintana Roo (Mexico) and the Chicxulub Ejecta Blanket [#2389] In southern Quintana Roo (Mexico) the Chicxulub ejecta blanket is discontinuously filling a karstified pre-KT land surface. This suggests a completely new scenario for the geological evolution of the southern Yucatán Peninsula. 2:15 p.m. Kring D. A. * Showman A. P. Durda D. D. Global Winds and Aerosol Updrafts Created by the Chicxulub Impact Event [#1544] Impact-generated thermal contrasts in the atmosphere may have generated high-velocity winds aloft and at the Earth’s surface. 2:30 p.m. Kyte F. T. * Gersonde R. Kuhn G. Detailed Results on Analyses of Deposits of the Eltanin Impact, Recovered in Sediment Cores from Polarstern Expedition ANT-XVIII/5a [#2129] An expedition by the RV Polarstern in 2001 explored 80,000 km2 of ocean floor and recovered 16 sediment cores containing ejecta deposits from the Eltanin impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Arguments and Evidence Against a Younger Dryas Impact Event
    Arguments and Evidence Against a Younger Dryas Impact Event M. Boslough,1 K. Nicoll,2 V. Holliday,3 T. L. Daulton,4 D. Meltzer,5 N. Pinter,6 A. C. Scott,7 T. Surovell,8 P. Claeys,9 J. Gill,10 F. Paquay,11 J. Marlon,10 P. Bartlein,12 C. Whitlock,13 D. Grayson,14 and A. J. T. Jull15 We present arguments and evidence against the hypothesis that a large impact or airburst caused a significant abrupt climate change, extinction event, and termina- tion of the Clovis culture at 12.9 ka. It should be noted that there is not one single Younger Dryas (YD) impact hypothesis but several that conflict with one another regarding many significant details. Fragmentation and explosion mechanisms proposed for some of the versions do not conserve energy or momentum, no physics-based model has been presented to support the various concepts, and existing physical models contradict them. In addition, the a priori odds of the impact of a >4 km comet in the prescribed configuration on the Laurentide Ice Sheet during the specified time period are infinitesimal, about one in 1015. There are three broad classes of counterarguments. First, evidence for an impact is lacking. No impact craters of the appropriate size and age are known, and no unambigu- ously shocked material or other features diagnostic of impact have been found in YD sediments. Second, the climatological, paleontological, and archeological events that the YD impact proponents are attempting to explain are not unique, are arguably misinterpreted by the proponents, have large chronological uncertainties, are not necessarily coupled, and do not require an impact.
    [Show full text]
  • BALTICA Volume 23 Number 1 June 2010 : 47-58
    BALTICA Volume 23 Number 1 June 2010 : 47-58 The Neugrund meteorite crater on the seafloor of the Gulf of Finland, Estonia Kalle Suuroja, Sten Suuroja Suuroja, K., Suuroja, S., 2010. The Neugrund meteorite crater on the seafloor of the Gulf of Finland.Baltica, 23 (1), 47– 58, Vilnius. ISSN 0067-3064. Abstract The Neugrund marine impact structure is located on the southern coast of the entrance to the Gulf of Finland (59o20’ N, 23o31’ E), straight eastward of the Osmussaar Island (Odensholm, Swed.; Odin’s Grave, Engl.). The structure is very well preserved and the only one with morphological units, visible and easily acces- sible for the researchers and skin–divers. The Neugrund is a complex meteorite crater about 20 km in diameter. In the centre of the structure emerges the inner crater with a two–ridged rim wall having approximately 7 km rim–to–rim diameter: an inner ridge of about 6 km and an outer ridge of about 8 km. The presence of a central peak (uplift) of about 5.5 km diameter in the deep part of the crater is not proven. A 4–5 km wide terrace or zone of dislocations surrounds the inner crater. The Neugrund impact structure formed in the Early Cambrian (ca. 535 Ma ago) as the result of impact of an asteroid about 1 km in diameter. Keywords Estonia, Gulf of Finland, Osmussaar, Odensholm, meteorite impact, impact structure, complex impact structure, inner crater, outer crater. Kalle Suuroja [[email protected]], Geological Survey of Estonia, Kadaka tee 82, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia; Sten Suuroja [s.suuroja @egk.ee], Institute of Ecology and Earth Science, Tartu University, Ravila 14a, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.
    [Show full text]
  • Thirty-Eighth Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Program Of
    38th LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS SPONSORED BY LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE NASA JOHNSON SPACE CENTER LPI THIRTY-EIGHTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE Program of Technical Sessions March 12–16, 2007 Sponsored by Lunar and Planetary Institute NASA Johnson Space Center Program Committee Stephen Mackwell, Co-Chair, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, Co-Chair, NASA Johnson Space Center Robert Anderson, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Nancy Chabot, Johns Hopkins University Catherine Corrigan, Johns Hopkins University David Draper, University of New Mexico Herbert Frey, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Yulia Goreva, University of Arizona Tracy Gregg, University at Buffalo Terry Hurford, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Ross Irwin, Smithsonian Institution Randy Korotev, Washington University at St. Louis Don Korycansky, University of California Santa Cruz Monika Kress, San Jose State University Rachel Lentz, University of Hawaii Karl Mitchell, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Daniel Nunes, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elisabetta Pierazzo, University of Arizona Louise Prockter, Johns Hopkins University Frans Rietmeijer, University of New Mexico Paul Schenk, Lunar and Planetary Institute Stephanie Shipp, Lunar and Planetary Institute Suzanne Smrekar, Jet Propulsion Laboratory David Vaniman, Los Alamos National Laboratory Michael Weisberg, Kingsborough College and the University of New York David Williams, Arizona State University James Zimbelman, Smithsonian Institution Michael Zolensky, NASA Johnson Space Center GUIDE TO TECHNICAL SESSIONS AND ACTIVITIES Sunday Evening, 5:00 p.m. LPI Hess Room Registration LPI Great Room Reception LPI Berkner Rooms Open House Education and Public Outreach Displays: p. 1 Accessing the Solar System Through Educational Products Monday Morning, 8:30 a.m. Crystal Ballroom A Mars Polar and Glacial Processes p.
    [Show full text]