Student Transportation HANDBOOK Walking, Biking, Parking, Transit, Carshare
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Transit Information Rockridge Station Oakland
B I R C H C T Transit N Transit Information For more detailed information about BART W E service, please see the BART schedule, BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. S Claremont Middle Stops OAK GROVE AVE K Rockridge L School San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Schedule Information e ective February 11, 2019 Fares e ective May 26, 2018 A Transit (BART) rail service connects W 79 Drop-off Station the San Francisco Peninsula with See schedules posted throughout this station, or pick These prices include a 50¢ sur- 51B Drop-off 79 Map Key Oakland, Berkeley, Fremont, up a free schedule guide at a BART information kiosk. charge per trip for using magnetic E A quick reference guide to service hours from this stripe tickets. Riders using (Leave bus here to Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, and T transfer to 51A) other cities in the East Bay, as well as San station is shown. Clipper® can avoid this surcharge. You Are Here Francisco International Airport (SFO) and U Oakland Oakland International Airport (OAK). Departing from Rockridge Station From Rockridge to: N (stations listed in alphabetical order) 3-Minute Walk 500ft/150m Weekday Saturday Sunday I M I L E S A V E Train Destination Station One Way Round Trip Radius First Last First Last First Last Fare Information e ective January 1, 2016 12th St. Oakland City Center 2.50 5.00 M H I G H W AY 2 4 511 Real-Time Departures Antioch 5:48a 12:49a 6:19a 12:49a 8:29a 12:49a 16th St. -
2017-2026 Samtrans Short Range Transit Plan
SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT Short-Range Transit Plan Fiscal Years 2017 – 2026 May 3, 2017 Acknowledgements San Mateo County Transit District Board of Directors 2017 Rose Guilbault, Chair Charles Stone, Vice Chair Jeff Gee Carole Groom Zoe Kersteen-Tucker Karyl Matsumoto Dave Pine Josh Powell Peter Ratto Senior Staff Michelle Bouchard, Chief Operating Officer, Rail Michael Burns, Interim Chief Officer, Caltrain Planning / CalMod April Chan, Chief Officer, Planning, Grants, and Transportation Authority Jim Hartnett, General Manager/CEO Kathleen Kelly, Interim Chief Financial Officer / Treasurer Martha Martinez, Executive Officer, District Secretary, Executive Administration Seamus Murphy, Chief Communications Officer David Olmeda, Chief Operating Officer, Bus Mark Simon, Chief of Staff Short Range Transit Plan Project Staff and Contributors Douglas Kim, Director, Planning Lindsey Kiner, Senior Planner, Planning David Pape, Planner, Planning Margo Ross, Director of Transportation, Bus Transportation Karambir Cheema, Deputy Director ITS, Bus Transportation Ana Rivas, South Base Superintendent, Bus Transportation Ladi Millard, Director of Budgets, Finance Ryan Hinchman, Manager Financial Planning & Analysis, Finance Donald G. Esse, Senior Operations Financial Analyst, Bus Operations Leslie Fong, Senior Administrative Analyst, Grants Tina Dubost, Manager, Accessible Transit Services Natalie Chi, Bus Maintenance Contract Administrator, Bus Transportation Joan Cassman, Legal Counsel (Hanson Bridgett) Shayna M. van Hoften, Legal Counsel (Hanson -
RTC Discount ID Card Program
Regional Transit Connection RTC Discount ID Card Program San Francisco Bay Area Region 1 The Regional Transit Connection (RTC) If you are eligible for the RTC Discount Discount ID Card is available to persons ID Card, you will receive a card that is with qualifying disabilities. You may use Clipper-ready and provides access to the card as proof of eligibility to receive Clipper features. For more information on discount fares on fixed-route, rail and ferry how to use these features, please contact systems throughout the San Francisco Bay your transit agency or Clipper Customer Area. The RTC Program does not apply to Service at (877) 878-8883. paratransit services. IMPORTANT NOTE: The RTC Program For specific fare information in your area, no longer issues cards to seniors (age 65 contact your local transit system. and over) unless they are traveling with an attendant. The Senior Clipper card offers Applications for the RTC Discount ID Card the same features and discounts, with no are accepted at San Francisco Bay Area application fee, and does not expire. You transit agency locations and forwarded can obtain a Senior Clipper card by mail, to a centralized processing office, where email, and fax, or at your local transit application information is verified. agency. Call your local transit agency or Qualified applicants are then mailed the visit www.clippercard.com for information new RTC Discount ID card. on how to obtain a Senior Clipper card. This brochure will guide you through the application process. Please note that the John Doe information in this brochure is subject to Jan 2020 change. -
H. Parks, Recreation and Open Space
IV. Environmental Setting and Impacts H. Parks, Recreation and Open Space Environmental Setting The San Francisco Recreation and Park Department maintains more than 200 parks, playgrounds, and open spaces throughout the City. The City’s park system also includes 15 recreation centers, nine swimming pools, five golf courses as well as tennis courts, ball diamonds, athletic fields and basketball courts. The Recreation and Park Department manages the Marina Yacht Harbor, Candlestick (Monster) Park, the San Francisco Zoo, and the Lake Merced Complex. In total, the Department currently owns and manages roughly 3,380 acres of parkland and open space. Together with other city agencies and state and federal open space properties within the city, about 6,360 acres of recreational resources (a variety of parks, walkways, landscaped areas, recreational facilities, playing fields and unmaintained open areas) serve San Francisco.172 San Franciscans also benefit from the Bay Area regional open spaces system. Regional resources include public open spaces managed by the East Bay Regional Park District in Alameda and Contra Costa counties; the National Park Service in Marin, San Francisco and San Mateo counties as well as state park and recreation areas throughout. In addition, thousands of acres of watershed and agricultural lands are preserved as open spaces by water and utility districts or in private ownership. The Bay Trail is a planned recreational corridor that, when complete, will encircle San Francisco and San Pablo Bays with a continuous 400-mile network of bicycling and hiking trails. It will connect the shoreline of all nine Bay Area counties, link 47 cities, and cross the major toll bridges in the region. -
Telegraph Avenue Public Realm Plan
Telegraph Avenue Public Realm Plan May 2016 SPROUL PLAZA Prepared for the City of Berkeley, Telegraph Business Improvement District, and UC Berkeley Table of Contents Executive Summary . 1 Demonstration Projects. 22 Overview. 22 Background. 3 Durant Plaza. 24 Purpose. 3 Dwight Triangle . 26 Conditions in 2016 . 4 Bancroft Scramble . 28 Process . 6 Design Objectives. 6 Implementation . 29 Time Horizon . 29 Design Elements. 6 Implementation Partners . 29 Overview . 8 Potential Funding Sources. 30 Phasing Strategy . 9 Technical Adequacy. 31 Sidewalk Etching . 11 Operational Needs . 31 Public Art. 12 Cost Estimates . 32 Modular Stations . 14 Scramble Intersections. 16 Acknowledgements . 33 Parklets . 17 Street Trees. 18 Pedestrian-Scaled Lighting . 19 Shared Street Improvements. 20 Green Infrastructure. 21 Executive Summary Executive Summary Berkeley’s iconic Telegraph Avenue hosts a high TPRP also establishes a long-term vision for a 6. Street Trees. New trees will be planted volume of daily visitors, is surrounded by high more dramatic transformation of Telegraph, as where trees are missing or in poor condi- density neighborhoods, and abuts UC Berkeley, funding becomes available. A “shared street,” tion using a consistent palette of species. yet the district has suffered from disinvestment, with a plaza-like surface that extends seam- 7. Street Lighting. Lighting will be ret- which has been exacerbated by relatively few lessly across Telegraph, forms the centerpiece rofitted for a vibrant environment, and public realm improvements and the lack of an for ultimate conditions. Design elements may be replaced with pedestrian-scaled overall vision for the area. In this context, the must, therefore, be affordable in the near- lighting in the long term. -
ACT BART S Ites by Region.Csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7
Services Transit Outreach Materials Distribution Light Rail Station Maintenance and Inspection Photography—Capture Metadata and GPS Marketing Follow-Up Programs Service Locations Dallas, Los Angeles, Minneapolis/Saint Paul San Francisco/Oakland Bay Area Our Customer Service Pledge Our pledge is to organize and act with precision to provide you with excellent customer service. We will do all this with all the joy that comes with the morning sun! “I slept and dreamed that life was joy. I awoke and saw that life was service. I acted and behold, service was joy. “Tagore Email: [email protected] Website: URBANMARKETINGCHANNELS.COM Urban Marketing Channel’s services to businesses and organizations in Atlanta, Dallas, San Francisco, Oakland and the Twin Cities metro areas since 1981 have allowed us to develop a specialty client base providing marketing outreach with a focus on transit systems. Some examples of our services include: • Neighborhood demographic analysis • Tailored response and mailing lists • Community event monitoring • Transit site management of information display cases and kiosks • Transit center rider alerts • Community notification of construction and route changes • On-Site Surveys • Enhance photo and list data with geocoding • Photographic services Visit our website (www.urbanmarketingchannels.com) Contact us at [email protected] 612-239-5391 Bay Area Transit Sites (includes BART and AC Transit.) Prepared by Urban Marketing Channels ACT BART S ites by Region.csv TB1 TB6 TB4 TB2 TB3 TB5 TB7 UnSANtit -
Peninsula Rail Program Moves Forward Caltrain and the House Gas Emissions and California High Speed Rail Railroad Safety
Caltrain Winter 2010 Connection Information for Customers Peninsula Rail Program Moves Forward Caltrain and the house gas emissions and California High Speed Rail railroad safety. Authority are on track with a The Peninsula Rail plan to modernize and elec- Program project team is trify the Caltrain corridor and developing a draft of high- to introduce high speed rail in speed train project alterna- California. tives for the Caltrain corridor, A number of community taking into account the public forums were held to outline comment and input received the issues and identify over the last year. opportunities that a The alternatives will combined Caltrain/high-speed consider whether the addition rail project can address, of two additional tracks for including train noise and high-speed can be accom- The future vision of Caltrain running electric multiple units vibrations, air quality, green- out of Millbrae station. continued on page 5 Caltrain Addresses Recent Delays Wheelchair lift won’t retract. too will be delayed. Also, if the train evaluation of both the locomotive and Signal is displaying red. Engine can’t get to its destination on time and passenger car fleet to identify areas “flip” to head in the opposite direc- of maintenance that should be en- won’t start. Trespasser steps in tion, those customers also will be late. hanced to not only provide increased path of train. The 90 weekday trains are operated reliability, but to provide the ride with only 20 train sets. That means quality and comfort level the No matter what the reason it has that one train set plays an integral role continued on page 3 the same result: delayed trains, in moving Caltrain’s resulting, more importantly, in delayed customers. -
Responses to Questions About the East Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project and Draft Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA)
Item 12 - Attachment 6 Attachment B1-E Responses to Questions about the East Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project and Draft Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Following is a list of questions about the East Bay BRT Project and the City of Berkeley’s staff proposal for a draft LPA compiled from written comments received through November 9, 2009 and questions submitted by the Willard Neighborhood in September 2009. Questions and answers are arranged into the following subject areas: 1. Traffic Impacts 2. Parking Impacts 3. Pedestrian and Bicycle Impacts 4. Land Use, Economic and Business Impacts 5. Transit Ridership/Demand 6. Route and Stops 7. Project Costs 8. Local Bus Service 9. Transit Fare 10. Other Questions 1. Traffic Impacts 1.1 What are the potential traffic mitigations that could be implemented in the Willard neighborhood? [Response from AC Transit.] To ensure an effective BRT project, consideration of trade- offs related to the movement of persons in the corridor is required. Dedicated use of a travel lane for the BRT system will likely result in traffic diversion from Telegraph onto local streets. To understand the likelihood, magnitude and specific locations of this effect, neighborhood traffic analysis will be conducted as part of the FEIS/R. To address potential adverse effects to local streets, AC Transit is considering implementing a neighborhood traffic protection program. The neighborhood protection program would assist in paying for the installation of devices to reduce traffic volumes or reduce traffic speeds on local streets, should they be adversely affected by the BRT project. AC Transit and the cities will need to establish criteria for when a local street is considered adversely affected and action is warranted. -
92 29 84 2 Alameda 5TH STREET CENT
2016/2017 Count Summary 2018 Count Summary PM (4-6 PM) Midday (12-2) School (2-4) PM (4-6 PM) Midday (12-2) School (2-4) Sidewalk Sidewalk Bike - Total No Helmet Wrong Way Ped Bike Ped Bike Ped Bike - Total No Helmet Wrong Way Scooters Ped Bike Ped Bike Ped ID City North/South East/West Riding Riding 1 Alameda BROADWAY LINCOLN AVENUE 35 8 5 4 93 29 69 49 10 3 4 - 92 29 84 2 Alameda 5TH STREET CENTRAL AVENUE 69 10 25 12 113 63 190 71 18 10 - - 87 52 124 3 Alameda MAIN ST RALPH APPEZATO MEMORIAL PARKWAY 97 15 51 7 24 27 3 1 1 2 14 4 Alameda PARK STREET CENTRAL AVENUE 42 33 2 - 1,039 21 1,561 73 29 25 - 1 1,262 28 1,584 5 Alameda PARK STREET OTIS DRIVE 35 23 6 - 332 22 317 65 23 15 15 5 335 10 296 6 Alameda WEBSTER STREET ATLANTIC AVENUE 33 18 4 - 425 34 627 26 24 19 - 5 301 20 440 7 Alameda WEBSTER ST SANTA CLARA AVE 41 19 15 7 514 50 18 19 1 4 479 8 Alameda County ASHLAND AVE LEWELLING BLVD 12 3 8 1 33 13 90 13 1 7 5 1 33 12 122 9 Alameda County CENTER ST CASTRO VALLEY BLVD 2 - - - 25 4 16 21 15 6 3 12 15 4 10 Alameda County REDWOOD RD CASTRO VALLEY BLVD 45 29 7 6 195 21 134 26 22 7 - 205 16 181 11 Alameda County E 14TH ST 159TH AVE 23 13 11 - 202 24 15 12 - 160 12 Alameda County FOOTHILL BLVD 164TH AVE. -
American Indian Cultural District Draft Ordinance 2020
FILE NO. ORDINANCE NO. 1 [Administrative Code - American Indian Cultural District] 2 3 Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to establish the American Indian Cultural 4 District in and around the northwestern quadrant of the Mission District; to require the 5 Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development to submit written reports and 6 recommendations to the Board of Supervisors and the Mayor describing the cultural 7 attributes of the District and proposing strategies to acknowledge and preserve the 8 cultural legacy of the District; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination 9 under the California Environmental Quality Act. 10 11 NOTE: Unchanged Code text and uncodified text are in plain Arial font. Additions to Codes are in single-underline italics Times New Roman font. 12 Deletions to Codes are in strikethrough italics Times New Roman font. Board amendment additions are in double-underlined Arial font. 13 Board amendment deletions are in strikethrough Arial font. Asterisks (* * * *) indicate the omission of unchanged Code 14 subsections or parts of tables. 15 16 Be it ordained by the People of the City and County of San Francisco: 17 18 Section 1. Findings. 19 (a) The Planning Department has determined that the actions contemplated in this 20 ordinance comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources 21 Code Sections 21000 et seq.). Said determination is on file with the Clerk of the Board of 22 Supervisors in File No. ___ and is incorporated herein by reference. The Board affirms this 23 determination. 24 (b) On _____________________, the Historic Preservation Commission held a duly 25 noticed hearing regarding the effects of this ordinance upon historic or cultural resources, and Supervisors Ronen; Mandelman, Brown, Haney, Fewer, Peskin, Mar, Safai BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 1 submitted a written report to the Board of Supervisors as required under Charter Section 2 4.135. -
Mobility Payment Integration: State-Of-The-Practice Scan
Mobility Payment Integration: State-of-the-Practice Scan OCTOBER 2019 FTA Report No. 0143 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Ingrid Bartinique and Joshua Hassol Volpe National Transportation Systems Center COVER PHOTO Courtesy of Edwin Adilson Rodriguez, Federal Transit Administration DISCLAIMER This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Mobility Payment Integration: State-of-the- Practice Scan OCTOBER 2019 FTA Report No. 0143 PREPARED BY Ingrid Bartinique and Joshua Hassol Volpe National Transportation Systems Center 55 Broadway, Kendall Square Cambridge, MA 02142 SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 AVAILABLE ONLINE https://www.transit.dot.gov/about/research-innovation FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i Metric Conversion Table SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liter L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg megagrams T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 Mg (or “t”) (or “metric ton”) TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) o 5 (F-32)/9 o F Fahrenheit Celsius C or (F-32)/1.8 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. -
Informal Document No 3 Maas .Pdf
Informal document No. 3 Distr.: General 31 January 2020 English only Economic Commission for Europe Inland Transport Committee Eighty-second session Geneva, 25–28 February 2020 Item 4 (g) of the provisional agenda Strategic questions of a horizontal policy or regulatory nature: Analytical work on transport Transport Trends and Economics 2018–2019: Mobility as a Service Note by the secretariat Introduction 1. This document contains the publication on Mobility as a Service (MaaS) issued under the Transport Trends and Economics 2018–2019 activity of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Working Party on Transport Trends and Economics (WP.5). 2. The publication introduces and explains the MaaS concept (Chapter 1) and presents the MaaS enablers (Chapter 2 on Digital Enabler, Chapter 3 on Car-sharing and Chapter 4 on Bike-sharing) and MaaS application challenges (Chapter 5 on MaaS cost, risk and revenue challenges and Chapter 6 on MaaS infrastructure challenges). 3. This publication is presented to the Inland Transport Committee as one of the analytical outputs of WP.5 concluded in 2019. UNEC E Inland Transport Committee TransportTransport TrendsTrends andand EconomicsEconomics 20182018–2019–2019 MobilityMobility as as a a Service Service Mobility as a Service (MaaS) is a new mobility concept gaining pace in many cities around the world. Its value proposition concerns integration of mobility services which is realized by providing trip planning and one-stop fare purchase for the user through a single platform. The 2019 MaaS vision is being enabled by advances in intelligent systems, the internet of things, cloud – technology and big data management.