C-Banded Karyotype and Nors of the Long-Eared Hedgehog, Hemiechinus Auritus from Turkey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

C-Banded Karyotype and Nors of the Long-Eared Hedgehog, Hemiechinus Auritus from Turkey Folia Zool. – 58(1): 9–13 (2009) C-banded karyotype and NORs of the long-eared hedgehog, Hemiechinus auritus from Turkey Atilla ARSLAN1*, İrfan ALBAYRAK2, Nahit PAMUKOĞLU2, Tarkan YORULMAZ2 and Kubilay TOYRAN2 1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Selcuk University, 42031 Konya-Turkey; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Arts, Kırıkkale University, 71450 Kırıkkale, Turkey Received 11 September 2007; Accepted 5 January 2009 Abstract. The karyotype, C-banding, and nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) of six specimens of Hemiechinus auritus from Turkey were examined. The diploid number of chromosomes was 2n = 48, the fundamental number of chromosome arms FN = 96, and the number of autosomal arms FNa = 92. Most of the chromosomes possessed centromeric constitutive heterochromatin, except of the pairs nos. 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, and 17. The X and Y chromosomes appeared to be euchromatic, and possible geographic variation in their morphology was indicated in comparison with previously published data. The NORs were located in the terminal regions of the long arms of four metacentric or submetacentric chromosomes. The localization of the NORs was not associated with C-positive autosomal regions as in hedgehogs of the genus Erinaceus. Key words: chromosomal variation, mammals, insectivores Introduction The family Erinaceidae comprises six genera and 15 species distributed in Africa, Europe, and Asia, including certain parts of Indo-Malaysia (Wilson & Reeder 2005). The karyotype of Hemiechinus auritus (Gmelin, 1770) was studied by Gropp et al. (1969) from Afghanistan, Orlov (1969) from Daghestan, Gropp et al. (1969) and De Hondt (1988) from Egypt, Bhatnagar & El-Azawi (1978) from Iraq, Sharma et al. (1975) and Sobti & Gill (1980) from India, Zima & Král (1984) from the Kara- kum desert in Turkmenistan, and Kefelioğlu (1997) and Çolak et al. (1998) from Turkey. The G-, C-banding and NORs patterns were reported by Gropp et al. (1969), Graphodatsky et al. (1991), Yang et al. (1991), O’Brien et al. (2006), and Yang et al. (2006). Mandahl (1978, 1979) and Zima & Král (1984) emphasized that the species belonging to the family Erinaceidae have similar karyotypes but the localization of C-bands and NORs on chromosomes should be considered in their karyotypical structure, because their distribution may vary among both the species and populations. In this study, we aim to examine the karyotype of H. auritus from Turkey, with a special emphasis to the C-banding pattern and the distribution of nucleolar organizer regions (NORs). Materials and Methods The examined total six specimens (2 males, 4 females) of long-eared hedgehogs were collected from the Urfa (Ceylanpınar) and the central part of the Kilis province in Turkey. Chromosomal preparations were made using air-drying method from bone marrow (Ford * Corresponding author 9 & Hamerton 1956) after short cell cultivation, and conventional Giemsa-staining was applied. Constitutive heterochromatin and nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) were detected with C-banding (Sumner 1972) and Ag-NOR staining (Howell & Black 1980), respectively. A total of 10 to 20 slides were prepared from each specimen, and at least 20 well-spread metaphase plates were analysed. Chromosome morphologies were determined according to Zima (1978) by calculating centromeric indices. Results and Discussion The karyotype contained 48 chromosomes, the fundamental number of chromosomal arms was FN = 96, and the number of autosomal arms FNa = 92. All the autosomes and the sex chromosomes were bi-armed. The karyotype contained one pair of large subtelocentric autosomes (no. 23), two pairs of very small metacentric autosomes (nos. 21-22), and 20 pairs of metacentric and submetacentric autosomes with gradually decreasing size (nos. 1-20). The X chromosome was a medium-sized metacentric and the Y chromosome was the smallest bi-armed element of the complement (Fig. 1). The karyotype and chromosome characteristics of the specimens examined are quite similar to those reported in Afghanistan, Daghestan, Egypt, Iraq, India, Kara-kum, China and Turkey (Gropp et al. 1969, Orlov 1969, Bhatnagar & El-Azawi 1978, Sharma et al. 1975 Sobti & Gill 1980, Zima & Král 1984, De Hondt 1988, Yang et al. 1991, 2006, Kefelioğlu 1997, Çolak et al. 1998). Slightly different chromosome complements of H. auritus were reported from India (Sharma et al. 1975), Iraq (Bhatnagar & El-Azawi 1978), and Iran-Zenjan (Karataş et al. 2007). The karyotypes of hedgehogs from Iraq and India differed by morphology and size of the sex chromosomes, whereas the specimens from Iran Fig. 1. Metaphase spread and karyotype of Hemiechinus auritus. 10 Fig. 2. Metaphase spread and C-banded karyotype of Hemiechinus auritus. had a slightly different autosomal set characterized by the presence of dot-like and acrocentric chromosomes. These differences indicate possible geographic variation in the karyotype of H. auritus. The C-banded karyotype is shown in Fig. 2. Most of the autosomes contained a distinct block of centromeric constitutive heterochromatin, which was not observed in the autosomal pairs nos. 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, and 17. The chromosome pair no. 21 appeared to be entirely C-heterochromatic. The X and Y chromosomes were stained C-negatively, and appeared to be euchromatic. Gropp et al. (1969) determined heterochromatin regions in the karyotype of H. auritus by autoradiography. They observed heterochromatin in centromeric regions of some of the autosomes and in the sex chromosomes. Graphodatsky et al. (1991) and Yang et al. (1991) found a similar C-banding pattern in the autosomes, but the sex chromosomes were stained C-negatively. Mandahl (1978) detected indistinct C-bands in the centromeric regions of some chromosomes in species of the genus Erinaceus. By using silver-nitrate staining, NORs were determined in the telomeric region of the long arm of two pairs of metacentric or submetacentric chromosomes (Fig. 3). Yang et al. (1991) determined active NORs in the terminal and interstitial position on long arms of 3-5 chromosomes. Mandahl (1979) observed six NORs in different autosomal pairs of hedgehogs of the genus Erinaceus. The localization of NORs in H. auritus is not associated with heterochromatic regions as in the species of the genus Erinaceus. 11 Fig. 3. Silver-stained metaphase of Hemiechinus auritus. Arrow indicates the Ag-NOR bearing chromosomes. Acknowledgements We thank Prof. Dr Jan Zima and two anonymous referees for your valuable comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. LITERATURE Bhatnagar A.N. & El-Azawi T.F. 1978: A karyotype study of chromosomes of 2 species of hedgehogs, Hemiechinus auritus and Paraechinus aethiopicus (Insectivora: Mammalia). Cytologia 43: 53-59. Çolak E., Yigit N., Sozen M. & Ozkurt S. 1998: A study on the long-eared hedgehog, Hemiechinus auritus (Gmelin, 1770) (Mammalia: Insectivora), in Turkey. Turk. J. Zool. 22: 131-136. De Hondt H.A. 1988: Karyological studies on two insectivores of Egypt. Proc. Egypt. Acad. Sci. 25: 171-174. Ford C.E. & Hamerton J.L. 1956: A colchicine, hypotonic citrate, squash sequence for mammalian chromosomes. Stain Technol. 31: 247-251. Graphodatsky A.S., Radjabli S., Zaitsev M. & Sharshov A. 1991: Levels of chromosomal conservations among different groups of insectivores. In: Problems of taxonomy, faunistic and paleontology of mammals. Sankt- Peterburg 243: 47-57. Gropp A. & Natarajan A.T. 1972: Karyotype and heterochromation pattern of the Algerian hedgehog. Cytogenetics 11: 259-269. Gropp A., Citoler P. & Geisler M. 1969: Karyotype variation and heterochromatin pattern in hedgehogs (Erinaceus and Hemiechinus). Chromosoma 27: 228-307. 12 Howell W.M. & Black D.A. 1980: Controlled silver staining of nucleolar organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method. Experientia 36: 1014–1015. Karataş A., Gharkheloo M.M. & Kankılıç T. 2007: Cranial features and karyotypes of two hedgehogs (Insectivora: Erinaceidae) from Iran. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 36(6): 419-423. Kefelioğlu H. 1997: The karyotype of Hemiechinus auritus calligoni from Turkey. Z. Säugetierkd. 62: 312-314. Mandahl N. 1978: Variation in C-stained chromosome regions in European hedgehogs (Insectivora, Mammalia). Hereditas 89: 107-128. Mandahl N. 1979: Localization of nucleolar organizing regions in European hedgehogs. (Insectivora, Mammalia). Hereditas 91: 149-161. O’Brien S.J, Menninger J.C. & Nash W.G. 2006: Atlas of mammalian chromosomes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, N. J. Orlov V.N. 1969: [Chromosome complements of the hedgehogs from East Europe]. In: Vorontsov N.N. (ed.), Materialy. II. vsesoj. sov. po mlekopit.: 6-7 (in Russian). Sharma G.P., Mittal O.P. & Sobti R.C. 1975: Karyotype and chiasma frequency in the Indian hedgehog, Hemiechinus auritus collaris. Caryologia 28: 149-156. Sobti R.C. & Gill S.S. 1980: Chromosome number in fifteen mammals from India. Mamm. Chrom. Newsl. 21: 107. Sumner A.T. 1972: A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Expl. Cell Res. 75: 304–306. Wilson D. E. & Reeder D. M. 2005: Mammal species of the world: A taxonomic and geographic reference. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Yang F., Graphodatsky A.S., Li T., Fu B., Dobigny G., Wang J., Perelman P.L., Serdukova N.A., Su W., O’Brien P.C.M., Wang Y., Ferguson-Smith M.A., Volobouev V. & Ni W. 2006: Comparative genome maps of the pangolin, hedgehog, sloth, anteater and human revealed by cross-species chromosome painting: further insight into the ancestral karyotype and genome evolution of eutherian mammals. Chrom. Res. 14: 283-296. Yang F., Ma C. & Shi L. 1991: [Studies on the karyotypes of Erinaceus amurensis and Hemiechinus auritus]. Zool. Res. 12: 393-398 (in Chinese). Zima J. & Král B. 1984: Karyotypes of European mammals I. Acta. Sc. Nat. Brno. 8(7): 15-17. Zima J. 1978: Chromosome characteristics of Vespertilionidae from Czechoslovakia. Acta Sc. Nat. Brno 12(12): 1–38. 13.
Recommended publications
  • 71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT
    ISSN 1937-2809 online Journal of Supplement to the November 2011 Vertebrate Paleontology Vertebrate Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Society of Vertebrate 71st Annual Meeting Paleontology Society of Vertebrate Las Vegas Paris Nevada, USA Las Vegas, November 2 – 5, 2011 Program and Abstracts Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts COMMITTEE MEETING ROOM POSTER SESSION/ CONCURRENT CONCURRENT SESSION EXHIBITS SESSION COMMITTEE MEETING ROOMS AUCTION EVENT REGISTRATION, CONCURRENT MERCHANDISE SESSION LOUNGE, EDUCATION & OUTREACH SPEAKER READY COMMITTEE MEETING POSTER SESSION ROOM ROOM SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS SEVENTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PARIS LAS VEGAS HOTEL LAS VEGAS, NV, USA NOVEMBER 2–5, 2011 HOST COMMITTEE Stephen Rowland, Co-Chair; Aubrey Bonde, Co-Chair; Joshua Bonde; David Elliott; Lee Hall; Jerry Harris; Andrew Milner; Eric Roberts EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Philip Currie, President; Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Past President; Catherine Forster, Vice President; Christopher Bell, Secretary; Ted Vlamis, Treasurer; Julia Clarke, Member at Large; Kristina Curry Rogers, Member at Large; Lars Werdelin, Member at Large SYMPOSIUM CONVENORS Roger B.J. Benson, Richard J. Butler, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Hans C.E. Larsson, Mark A. Loewen, Philip D. Mannion, Jim I. Mead, Eric M. Roberts, Scott D. Sampson, Eric D. Scott, Kathleen Springer PROGRAM COMMITTEE Jonathan Bloch, Co-Chair; Anjali Goswami, Co-Chair; Jason Anderson; Paul Barrett; Brian Beatty; Kerin Claeson; Kristina Curry Rogers; Ted Daeschler; David Evans; David Fox; Nadia B. Fröbisch; Christian Kammerer; Johannes Müller; Emily Rayfield; William Sanders; Bruce Shockey; Mary Silcox; Michelle Stocker; Rebecca Terry November 2011—PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 1 Members and Friends of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, The Host Committee cordially welcomes you to the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Las Vegas.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytological Studies of Certain Desert Mammals of Saudi Arabia 3. the Karyotype of Paraechinus Aethiopicus
    Cytologia 50: 507-512, 1985 Cytological Studies of Certain Desert Mammals of Saudi Arabia 3. The Karyotype of Paraechinus aethiopicus A. A. AI-Saleh and M. A. Khan Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Accepted January 24, 1984 The mammalian fauna of Saudi Arabia is much more diverse and interesting than most realized and many new and interesting discoveries will certainly be made as it is studied. Cytogenetic surveys of the fauna, which have not been conducted so far in Saudi Arabia, are particularly of great importance in deciding the true systematic position of the individual animals and in evaluating the merits of these animals with reference to the desert ecosystem. Presently our paper deals with karyotype analysis of the hedgehog Paraechinus aethiopicus which is of common oc currence in Saudi Arabia. This study is one among the series of surveys of desert mammals of Saudi Arabia (Al-Saleh and Khan 1984 a, b). Except the hedgehog Erinaceus amurensis (2n=44) the diploid number of 48 chromosomes is seen in the various species of the well known genera, Erinaceus, Hemiechinus and Aethechinus (Painter 1925, Bovey 1949, Gropp and Geisler 1966, Gropp et al. 1966, Jordon 1966, Geisler and Gropp 1967, Kral 1967, Hsu and Benirschke 1968, Borgaonkar 1969, Gropp et al. 1969, Natarajan and Gropp 1971, Sharma et al. 1971, Gropp and Natarajan 1972, Matthey 1973 and Sharma et al. 1975). To the best of our knowledge there is only one report about the karyotype fo Paraechinus aethiopicus from Iraq (Bhatnagar and El-Azawi 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Risk of Importing Zoonotic Diseases Through Wildlife Trade, United States Boris I
    Risk of Importing Zoonotic Diseases through Wildlife Trade, United States Boris I. Pavlin, Lisa M. Schloegel, and Peter Daszak The United States is the world’s largest wildlife import- vidual animals during 2000–2004 (5). Little disease sur- er, and imported wild animals represent a potential source veillance is conducted for imported animals; quarantine is of zoonotic pathogens. Using data on mammals imported required for only wild birds, primates, and some ungulates during 2000–2005, we assessed their potential to host 27 arriving in the United States, and mandatory testing exists selected risk zoonoses and created a risk assessment for only a few diseases (psittacosis, foot and mouth dis- that could inform policy making for wildlife importation and ease, Newcastle disease, avian infl uenza). Other animals zoonotic disease surveillance. A total of 246,772 mam- mals in 190 genera (68 families) were imported. The most are typically only screened for physical signs of disease, widespread agents of risk zoonoses were rabies virus (in and pathogen testing is delegated to either the US Depart- 78 genera of mammals), Bacillus anthracis (57), Mycobac- ment of Agriculture (for livestock) or the importer (6). terium tuberculosis complex (48), Echinococcus spp. (41), The process of preimport housing and importation often and Leptospira spp. (35). Genera capable of harboring the involves keeping animals at high density and in unnatural greatest number of risk zoonoses were Canis and Felis (14 groupings of species, providing opportunities for cross- each), Rattus (13), Equus (11), and Macaca and Lepus (10 species transmission and amplifi cation of known and un- each).
    [Show full text]
  • Abeda Begum.Pmd
    Current World Environment Vol. 8(3), 395-402 (2013) Current Status of Mammals and Reptiles at Hub Dam Area, Sindh / Balochistan, Pakistan ABEDA BEGUM*1, M ZAHEER KHAN2, ABDUR RAZAQ KHAN3, AFSHEEN ZEHRA2, BABAR HUSSAIN4, SAIMA SIDDIQUI4 and FOZIA TABBASSUM2 1Department of Environmental Science, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan. 2Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan. 3Halcrow Pakistan (Pvt) limited, Karachi, Pakistan. 4Department of Zoology, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan. http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.8.3.08 (Received: October 01, 2013; Accepted: November 02, 2013) ABSTRACT During the present study in 2012, a total of twenty four mammalian species were recorded belonging to 5 orders and 10 families; out of these, 8 species are less common, 2 species are rare, while 14 species are common in Hub Dam area. Twenty five reptilian species belonging to 3 orders and 12 families were also recorded from the area. Three species of mammalian Urial (Ovis vignei), Chinkara/Indian Gazelle (Gazella bennettii) and Jungle Cat (Felis chaus), one reptilian species Common Krait (Bungarus caeruleus) were recorded as rare from the study area during 2012. During the present study, nine mammalian species Wild Goat/Sindh Ibex (Capra aegagrus), Urial (Ovis vignei), Chinkara/Indian Gazelle (Gazella bennettii), Indian Hedgehog (Paraechinus micropus), Cape Hare (Lepus capensis), Little Indian Field Mouse (Mus booduga), House Shrew (Sorex thibetanus), Balochistan Gerbil (Gerbillus nanus) and Indian Gerbil (Tatera indica) and two reptilian Warty Rock Gecko (Cyrtodactylus kachhensis kachhensis) and Banded Dwarf Gecko (Tropiocolotes helenae) were recorded from the area.
    [Show full text]
  • FWT-Caracal-Kutch-2019
    A Rare sighting of a Caracal from Kutch, India Ravi Kailas* CARACAL, MOMENTS BEFORE IT DISAPPEARED FROM VIEW This is a brief note to report a very rare sighting of a Caracal from a thorn forest location in Kutch, northwest India in April this year. This sighting took place on 7th April, 2019 at around 0645, in the relative cool of the morning (temp in the early 20’s C), on the brink of sunrise and under clear skies. The sighting occurred in undisturbed Tropical Thorn Forest (a predominant habitat type in the hills of Kutch), in hilly undulating terrain, with high ground interspersed with small ravines/ gullies. The Caracal was first seen about 40m away, from a vehicle, on a faint trail, in open terrain, before disappearing behind thickets and onto lower ground, away from the line of sight. The sighting occurred within, approximately, 500m from a relatively busy main road, from where traffic noise could be heard. The entire sighting lasted less than a minute, but the animal did not appearunduly disturbed and moved away in an unhurried manner. There was an apparent abundance of Indian Peafowl (a significant potential prey for Caracal in these forests) in the vicinity of the sighting and we also recorded Indian Hare, Indian Gazelle, Wild Pig and Golden Jackal. There was a forest temple within a few hundred metres of the sighting, with an open water source. In a concerted effort at finding potential Caracal sites in Kutch, with the indispensable aid of local expert Mr. Jugal Tiwari of CEDO Birding, we were also able to locate spoor and gather local knowhow on Caracal presence in two other locations in this vast, but vey interesting ecoregion.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Checklist of Indian Mammals FINAL.Pmd
    CHECKLIST OF INDIAN MAMMALS REVISED AND UPDATED 2008 417 species in 48 families Taxonomy and nomenclature as per Wilson & Reeder (2005) I. ORDER: PROBOSCIDEA 1) Family: Elephantidae (Elephants) 1. Elephas maximus Linnaeus, 1758 Asian Elephant - I, SR, N, BH, BA, M, SE II. ORDER: SIRENIA 2) Family: Dugongidae (Dugong) 2. Dugong dugon (Müller, 1776) Dugong - I, PK(?), SR, M, BA, SE, P, ET, AU - Tropical coastal waters of Indian and W Pacific Ocean III. ORDER: SCANDENTIA 3) Family: Tupaiidae (Treeshrews) 3. Anathana ellioti (Waterhouse, 1850) Madras Treeshrew - I (EN) 4. Tupaia belangeri (Wagner, 1841) Northern Treeshrew - I, N, M, BA, SE, P 5. Tupaia nicobarica (Zelebor, 1869) Nicobar Treeshrew- I (EN) IV. ORDER: PRIMATES SUBORDER: STREPSIRRHINI 4) Family: Lorisidae (Lorises) 6. Loris lydekkerianus Cabrera, 1908 Gray Slender Loris - I, SR 7. Nycticebus bengalensis (Lacépède, 1800) Bengal Slow Loris - I, M, BA, SE, P SUBORDER: HAPLORRHINI 5) Family: Cercopithecidae (Old World monkeys) Subfamily: Cercopithecinae (Macaques) 8. Macaca arctoides (I. Geoffroy, 1831) Stump-tailed Macaque - I, SE, P 9. Macaca assamensis Mc Clelland, 1840 Assam Macaque - I, N, SE, P 10. Macaca fascicularis (Raffles, 1821) Crab-eating Macaque - I, M, SE 11. Macaca leonina (Blyth, 1863) Northern Pig-tailed Macaque - I, M, BA, SE, P 12. Macaca mulatta (Zimmermann, 1780) Rhesus Macaque - I, AF, PK, SE, P 13. Macaca munzala Sinha, Datta, Madhusudan and Mishra, 2005 Arunachal Macaque - I (EN) 14. Macaca radiata (É. Geoffroy, 1812) Bonnet Macaque - I (EN) 15. Macaca silenus (Linnaeus, 1758) Lion-tailed Macaque - I (EN) Subfamily: Colobinae (Langurs and Leaf-monkeys) 16. Semnopithecus ajax (Pocock, 1928) Kashmir Gray Langur - I, PK 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Srinu's Insectivores 10Jan04 Final
    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 19(2): 1361-1371 CHECKLIST OF INSECTIVORES (MAMMALIA: INSECTIVORA) OF SOUTH ASIA S. Chakraborty 1, C. Srinivasulu 2*, Bhargavi Srinivasulu 2, M.S. Pradhan 3 and P.O. Nameer 4 1 Zoological Survey of India, ‘M’ Block, New Alipur, Kolkata, West Bengal 700053, India. 2 Wildlife Biology Section, Department of Zoology, Osmania University, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500007, India. 3 Western Regional Station, Zoological Survey of India, Vidyanagar, Sector 29, Rawat Road, PCNTDA Post, Pune, Maharashtra 411044, India. 4 Department of Wildlife, College of Forestry, Kerala Agricultural University, Velanikkara, Thrissur, Kerala 680656, India. * Corresponding author Email: 1 [email protected]; 2 [email protected]; 3 [email protected]; 4 [email protected] Abstract IUCN (1995), and, Roberts (1997) to gain insights on the current A checklist of 38 species of insectivores belonging to taxonomic status of insectivores occurring in the region. 12 genera under four subfamilies in three families, Besides these, we also referred to numerous sources for (namely, Erinaceidae Fischer, 1817; Talpidae Fischer, 1817 information including Sclater (1891), Cabrera (1925), Lindsay and Soricidae Fischer, 1817) known to occur in South (1929), Allen (1938), Ellerman and Morrison-Scott (1951), Asia including Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Harrison (1958), Petter (1963), Biswas and Ghose (1970), Abe Pakistan and Sri Lanka is provided. (1971, 1932), Niethammer (1973), Chakraborty (1975, 1983), Doglov and Hoffman (1977), Jameson and Jones (1977), Mitchell Keywords (1975), Corbet (1978, 1988), Hutterer (1979), Corbet and Hill (1980, Checklist, Erinaceidae, Soricidae, Talpidae, 1986), Saha (1980), Hoffman (1986, 1987), Butler (1988), George Insectivora, Mammalia, South Asia (1988), Yates and Moore (1990), Abe et al.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Threatened Insectivores and Tree Shrews (Following IUCN, 1995)
    Foreword One of the curiosities of eastern Nepal is a little-known will enable information about insectivores and tree shrews . insectivore known locally as or “water to contribute to such public information programmes. rat”. Knowing that its occurrence in the mountains to the Several of these projects have research components, and east of Mt. Everest, on the border with Tibet, was still these could be modified to incorporate appropriate only suspected, I spent several weeks in 1973 seeking to research into tree shrews and insectivores. confirm its occurrence there. With teams of local Sherpas, Other important research questions for which answers we trudged through many mountain torrents, turning might be sought could include: over rocks, searching for evidence, and setting live traps. Our efforts were finally rewarded by capturing one What role do insectivores play in maintaining the individual of this elegant little water shrew, with diversity of insect faunas? amazingly silky fur, webbed feet with fringes, and a paddle-like tail. The local people were well aware of the What role do moles and fossorial shrews play in the existence of this animal, though they paid little attention cycling of nutrients and water in forested ecosystems? to it because it was so innocuous and seemed to have so little to do with their affairs. How do tree shrews affect forest regeneration? Do In this sense, the Nepalese were no different than most they play any role in seed dispersal? Control insects other people in the world: insectivores are basically which prey on seedlings? unknown, unnoticed, and unloved. Yet as this Action Plan shows, these inconspicuous members of virtually Given that some populations of widespread species of all ecosystems throughout Eurasia are an important part shrews are becoming isolated, can these populations of the ecological fabric of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Celebrating the Most Useful Yet Most Neglected Mammals
    Newsletter celebrating the most useful yet most neglected Mammals for CCINSA & RISCINSA -- Chiroptera, Rodent, Insectivore, & Scandens Conservation and Information Networks of South Asia Volume 1 Number 1 Jan -July 2009 Bats as Seasonal Sources of Meat among Poor Chepangs Gandhiv Kafle and Prakash Limboo Ethnozoology is the study to know how cultures use animal and animal byproducts. It includes classification and naming of zoological forms, cultural knowledge and use of wild and domestic animals. Ethnozoology is an interdisciplinary subject and combines anthropological, cognitive and linguistic perspectives with natural scientific approaches to the description and interpretation of people’s knowledge and use of animals. The broader focus is on how animals are perceived, used and managed in human societies, including their use for food, medicine and personal adornment, as well as their use in divination and ritual. Bat trap - net This article is based on rapid assessment carried out in September 2008 on ethnozoology of bats in Chepang community of Thumka village of Bhumlichowk Village Development Committee in Gorkha District of Nepal. Direct observation and key informants’ interview were the major methods used in this study. Net infront of Chiuri tree LIBIRD, Pokhara, [email protected] (combined) BAT NET - CCINSA Newsletter and Rat-A-Tattle - RISCINSA Newsletter Conservation and Information Network of South Asia, Volume 1, Number 1, Jan-July 2009 Chepangs are one of the tribal groups with semi-nomadic existence in Nepal. Most of them are still practicing traditional means of subsistence such as food gathering and hunting. Chepangs live in the Gorkha, Tanahun, Chitwan, Makawanpur and Dhading districts.
    [Show full text]
  • 73 Temperature As Per the Data Recorded at Meteorological Station
    Temperature As per the data recorded at meteorological station, Jaisalmer, the temperature begins to increase from January till May. May and June are the hottest months with highest temperature of 41.60C recorded in May month. The lowest temperature of 23.70C was recorded in month of January. The daily mean minimum temperature varies from 7.60C in January to 27.00C in June, whereas the daily mean maximum temperature varies from 23.70C in January to 41.60C in May. Rainfall The total annual rainfall in the region is about 208 mm as per the data from the year 1948-2000. The monsoon sets in June and attains the high intensity in month of August. The monsoon withdraws towards the end of the September. The remaining months of the year also experience the sporadic rains. The maximum rainfall was observed during month of August (75.8 mm) and minimum during the month of November (1.5 mm). 6.4.7 Natural Hazards The Building and Material Council of India (BMTPC) has published hazard maps of India1. As per these maps the study area falls under the respective hazard zones: Seismic The project area falls in Seismic Zone I which is defined as a low damage risk zone and vulnerable to earthquakes of intensity MSK VI2 (as defined by the BMTPC - Figure 6.6). Most recent seismic activity that occurred in Jaisalmer district was when an earthquake of magnitude Mw=5.1 struck the area on 9 April 2009. According to data available on ASC (Amateur Seismic Centre) website, this moderate earthquake (M 5.0-5.9 termed as moderate) had its epicentre east of Mokal village, which lies approximately 80 km north-west of the wind farm area and was felt in a large part of the region along the India- Pakistan border.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    J. R. B. ALFRED N. K. SINHA S. CHAKRABORTY ZOOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA OCCASIONAL PAPER NO. 199 RECORDS OF THE ZOOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA CHECKLIST OF MAMMALS OF INDIA J. R. B. ALFRED N. K. SINHA* S.CHAKRABORTY Zoological Survey of India, M-B10 ck, New A lip ore, Kolkata-700053 *Zoological Survey of India, Northern Regional Station, Dehra Dun (Present Address : Joint Director, National Zoological Park, Mathura Road, New Delhi-I I0003) Zoological Survey of India Kolkata CITATION Alfred, J. R. B.; Sinha, N. K. and Chakraborty, S. 2002. Checklist of Mammels of India. Rec. zoo/. Surv. India. Dcc. Paper No. 199 : 1-289. (Published - Director, Zoo!. Surv. India, Kolkata) Published: September, 2002 ISBN 81-85874-79-4 © Government oj India, 2002 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • No part of this publication may be reproduced stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any from or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. • This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade, be lent, resold hired out or otherwise disposed of without the publisher's consent, in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published. • The correct price of this p\Jblication is the price printed on this page. Any revised price indicated by a rubber stamp or by a sticker or by any other means is incorrect and should be unacceptable. PRICE Indian Rs. 350.00 Foreign : $(U .S.) 20, £ 15 Published at the Publication Division by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, 234/4, A.
    [Show full text]
  • HWS Newsletter Volume 84
    Hedgehog Welfare Society Newsletter #84 January/February 2017 To protectTo protect the the well well-being-being of of pet pet hedgehogs hedgehogs throughthrough rescue, rescue, research research and and education education of the of people people who who care care for for them them.. http://www.clipartpanda.com/clipart_images/hedgehog-clipart-70872846 Considering a Hedgehog? Things You Should Know, Part 1 By Laura C. Dunklee, HWS Co-Chair for Health, Research & Education Part one of a two part article on what to expect when you adopt a hedgehog. The Genesis of the Article Frequently, prospective or new hedgehog guardians join the Hedgehog Welfare Society (HWS) and other Facebook groups and start asking questions about caretaking. This is excellent, as it means they want to ConsideringIn Thisa Hedgehog? Issue Part 1 1 learn about caring for a bundle of quills and an informed hedgehog guardian is best able to provide a wonderful life for a hedgie. Considering a Hedgehog? Things I thought that an article that covers the basics would be helpful. You Should Know, Part 1 1—5 However, I’ve been a hedgehog guardian for more than 13 years, long Thoughts from the President 6 enough that I’ve forgotten what it’s like to be new to the It’s Wheel-A-Thon Time ! 7 marvelousness of these beings. I can’t now recall my initial “Oh, wow, Hedgehog Birthdays 8 what is Miss Penelope Anne doing and is this normal?!” moments. So while I can share what I’ve experienced over the years, a lot of 1838 Portrait of an Echidna 8 “normal” hedgehog things don’t come to mind when trying to help a Literary Hedgehog 9 newcomer.
    [Show full text]