Territory Establishment, Size, and Tenacity by Male Red-Winged Blackbirds

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Territory Establishment, Size, and Tenacity by Male Red-Winged Blackbirds TERRITORY ESTABLISHMENT, SIZE, AND TENACITY BY MALE RED-WINGED BLACKBIRDS JAROSLAVPICMAN Departmentof Biology,University of Ottawa,30 SomersetE., Ottawa,Ontario KIN 6N5, Canada ABSTRACT.--Mostmale Red-wingedBlackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) established their first territoriesby replacingterritory holdersthat disappeared.These territories were significantly larger than those establishedeither through subdivisionof the vacatedterritory between two or three replacementmales, or through insertion of a new territory through displacement of one or more resident males. Almost all returning male Red-wings settled on their former territoriesin consecutiveyears. Their territoriesremained similar in sizeand locationbetween years. Strong territory tenacity apparently is favored by lower costs of territory defense becauseof reduced aggressionbetween familiar neighborsand site dominanceeffects. The lower costsof territory defensepresumably also allowed the site-tenaciousmales to establish larger territories in consecutive years. Strong territory tenacity by returning males could explain much of the settlementpattern of new males.As a result, the spatialarrangement of male territories in the study marsh (i.e. the location of territorial boundaries)was similar in consecutiveyears. Traditionalism in the male territorial systemshould influence Red-wing mating patterns.Received 27 January1986, accepted 5 January1987. MANY birds return to the same territories in between years. This, along with strong female consecutiveyears and frequently breed with site tenacity, could lead to a high degree of previousmates (e.g. Richdale1957; Coulson and "traditionalism" in both the distribution and White 1958, 1960; Krebs 1971; Richdale and number of male territories, and the distribution Warham 1973; Picman 1981; B•dard and La- of females in a given marsh. Pointe 1984; Cuthbert 1985; Gratto et al. 1985). Territory tenacityshould also be favored be- Territory tenacity and mate fidelity may in- causeof strongintrasexual competition for lim- crease the fitness of returning individuals ited breeding space(Rohwer 1982). This is be- through acceleratedpair formation (Lehrman causefamiliarity reducesthe level of aggression and Wortis 1967, Morris and Ericson 1971, Er- between neighbors(Yasukawa et al. 1982) and, icson 1973), increasedforaging efficiency,and thus, presumably lowers the costsof territory improved escape from predators (e.g. Hinde establishmentby returning males. Strong site 1956, Tinbergen 1957). Hence, site tenacity and tenacity by returning males could, in turn, de- mate fidelity play an important role in arian termine the location and size of territories es- reproductive strategies. tablished by new males. In addition, territory Territorytenacity could affect significantly the tenacityby returning malescould influence the mating pattern of polygynous speciessuch as size of their territories. With respectto benefits the Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaiusphoeniceus; associatedwith territory tenacity, the less te- Searcy 1979, Picman 1981). Female Red-wings naciousindividuals should experiencehigher return to their previous territories in consecu- rates of territorial interactions, and these could tive years,regardless of whether their previous negativelyinfluence the sizeof their territories. mate returned (Picman 1981). As a result, new The lower costsof territorydefense derived from malesmay "inherit" the haremsof the previous the high degreeof territory tenacityin return- territory holders(Picman 1981).Previous stud- ing males, however, should allow an increase ies on Red-wings suggestthat males also gen- in territory size in consecutiveyears if neigh- erally return to their territories in subsequent boring territoriesare vacated.Because breeding years(Nero 1956,Case and Hewitt 1963, Searcy space is often limited in marsh-nesting Red- 1979). Becauseoverwinter return rates of male wings (e.g. Orians 1961, Hurly and Robertson Red-wingsare relatively high (over 50%;Fank- 1985),acquiring a larger territory may increase hauser 1967, Picman unpubl. data), the distri- the probabilityof acquiringa largerharem (Pic- bution of Red-wing territoriesshould be similar man 1980b). 405 The Auk 104: 405-412. July 1987 406 JAROSLAVPICMAN [Auk, Vol. 104 Returningto the sameterritory shouldbe dis- tion of new territories, and the degree of territory advantageousfor malesthat experiencedlow tenacity by returning males, were examined in two reproductive success.To evaluate the role of ways. I measured the absolute overlap (m2) between previousbreeding experience,we need to de- the territoriesof a given male in successiveyears and the year-to-year change in size of the territories of termine if territory size, harem size, and fledg- returning males. To obtain an index of change in ing successof malesaffect territorial shifts be- territory location, I divided the overlapping area of tween years.This informationshould indicate the new and previous territories by the size of the the relative importance of intrasexual compe- new territory. This index estimatedthe proportion of tition in determining the pattern of territory a new territory locatedwithin the previous territory establishmentby male Red-wings.Thus, if low of a given male, and ranged from 0 for a nonover- reproductivesuccess did not influencethe de- lapping territory to 1 for a new territory locatedwith- greeof territoryshifts, competition among males in the previous territory. An index of changein ter- for breedingspace presumably played the major ritory size was estimatedas follows:territory size in role in favoring the high degree of territory year 2 - territory size in year 1 + 6,500 (this constant was added to transform negative into positive values, tenacityby males. and correspondsto the highest negative value of ter- I report the resultsof a 5-yr study on male ritory changedue to territory sizereduction from year Red-wingedBlackbird territoriality. My objec- I to 2). An Apple GraphicsTablet was usedto analyze tives were to examine the pattern of territory spatialdata on territory size and the amount of over- establishmentby new males;the degreeof ter- lap betweennew and previousterritories of returning ritory tenacity in males that returned to the and replacementmales. Methods of studying repro- marsh in consecutiveyears; the effect of terri- ductive and mating successof males are described tory size,mating success,and reproductivesuc- elsewhere (Picman 1980a, 1981). The critical level for cesson shifts of male territories between years; rejectinga null hypothesiswas P < 0.05. One-tailed testswere usedwhenever directional predictions could and the effect of territory tenacity on the size be made. of male territories. RESULTS METHODS Patternof territoryestablishment by newmales.-- The study was conductedbetween 1976 and 1980 in an extensive, brackish-water marsh at George C. A total of 95 territories defended by 61 males Reifel MigratoryBird Sanctuary,on WesthamIsland, (3 present for 4 yr and 1 throughout the 5-yr Delta, British Columbia. The higher grounds of this study period) was observed.In 1977-1980,41 marsh are coveredby a relatively homogeneouscat- new males established first territories in the tail (Typhalatifolia) vegetation. Sedges (Carex sp.) study area (Table 1). Most new males(66%) re- and bulrushes (Scirpussp.) dominate the lower areas placedterritory holders that disappearedfrom near the seashore.Only two passerinespecies, the the studymarsh (n = 26) or that abandonedtheir Red-wingedBlackbird and the Marsh Wren (Cistotho- old territory and establisheda new territory ruspalustris), commonly breed in this marsh. elsewhere in the marsh (n = 1). Approximately Early in April 1976 I establisheda grid systemby 78% of territories establishedby replacement dividing the study area (between 15 and 25 ha in differentyears) into 20 x 20-m quadrats.This made overlappedby at least 60% with the original it possibleto map the locationof singingperches of territories (Fig. 1). Somereplacement males ex- male Red-wings and to quantify their interactions panded the territoriesof their predecessorsby with intruders. Eachyear unbanded maleswere cap- including areas located outside the breeding tured using a decoy trap (Picman 1979) and color- areain a previousyear. This reduced the degree banded. Territories of individual males were deter- of overlap between the original and new ter- mined eachyear in April and early May by recording ritories. Despitethese changes, the original and the locationof singing perches,flight paths,and in- new territories were similar in size (Table 2). teractionswith conspecificintruders on mapsof the As a result, the size of new territories estab- studyarea. Territory sizes were calculatedby the min- lished by replacementmales correlated signif- imum convexpolygon method. Territory establishmentby new males (i.e. males icantly with the original territory size (r = 0.60, df = 17, P < 0.001). that appearedin the marsh for the first time) was studied by examining their recruitment into the Eight adult malesestablished their first ter- breeding population. The effect of replacementof ritoriesby dividing three vacatedterritories be- malesthat disappearedby singlemales on the loca- tween 2 (n = 1) or 3 (n = 2) replacement indi- July 1987] Territorialityin Male Red-wingedBlackbirds 407 TABLE1. Recruitmentof male Red-winged Blackbirdsinto the breeding population, 1977-1980. Number of new males settling in: 1977- Mode of territory establishment 1977 1978 1979 1980 1980 Replacementof a male
Recommended publications
  • Microcebus Murinus)
    Sex-specific differences in dispersal propensities and their consequences for grey mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus) D i s s e r t a t i o n zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch‐Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultäten der Georg‐August‐Universität zu Göttingen vorgelegt von Susanne Schliehe‐Diecks aus Glandorf Göttingen 2012 Referent: Prof. Dr. Peter M. Kappeler Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Eckhard W. Heymann Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 16.07.2012 Grey mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus), nocturnal, solitary active primates CONTENTS CONTENTS GENERAL INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1: DISPERSAL MOVEMENTS Walk the line – Dispersal movements of gray mouse lemurs………..............................11 with Manfred Eberle and Peter M. Kappeler Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology (2012): in press CHAPTER 2: PROXIMATE MECHANISMS OF NATAL DISPERSAL Ready to go? On the relationship between natal dispersal and body mass in gray mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus)...............................................................37 with Manfred Eberle and Peter M. Kappeler Behavioral Ecology: submitted CHAPTER 3: SEX‐SPECIFIC BEHAVIOURAL DIFFERENCES On the application of mixed hidden Markov models to multiple behavioural time series....................................................................................................................57 with Peter M. Kappeler and Roland Langrock Interface Focus (2012) 2: 180‐189 CHAPTER 4: CONSEQUENCES OF NATAL DISPERSAL The
    [Show full text]
  • When Should a Territory Resident Attack?
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2001, 62, 749–759 doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1799, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on When should a territory resident attack? PAUL V. SWITZER*, JUDY A. STAMPS† & MARC MANGEL‡ *Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Illinois University †Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis ‡Department of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz (Received 10 August 2000; initial acceptance 2 October 2000; final acceptance 15 March 2001; MS. number: A8855) Models of territorial defence tend to omit two characteristics of many territorial systems: repeated intrusions by the same individual and the learning processes of residents and intruders. Here we present state-dependent, dynamic models of feeding territories, designed to investigate temporal patterns of resident aggression towards intruders that are capable of spatial learning. We compare two types of models: (1) a nomadic intruder model, in which intruders never visit the same territory twice, and (2) a single, repeat intruder model, in which an intruder may repeatedly intrude into a given territory but is less likely to do so after being attacked. These two models produce qualitatively and quantitatively different patterns of aggression by residents. For instance, residents with intruders that may repeatedly intrude have high initial attack rates, regardless of initial probability of intrusion, but their attack rates decline over time. In contrast, residents in the nomadic intruder model do not attack intruders if intrusion rates are moderately high, and their attack rates are constant and high for most of the period of territory tenure. In addition, residents of both nomadic and repeat intruder scenarios stopped attacking intruders for a short period before voluntarily abandoning their feeding territories.
    [Show full text]
  • White-Tailed Deer Scientific Name: Odocoileus Virginianus
    ODNR Division of Wildlife Life History Notes White-tailed Deer Scientific Name: Odocoileus virginianus Publication 101 (R503) Introduction with heavy, long guard hairs and a thick under- The white-tailed deer, commonly referred to coat that provides excellent insulation. White as the whitetail, is perhaps Ohio’s best-known patches are found around the eyes, on the wildlife species. It is seen in the state’s wildlife throat, belly, tail (underside), and insides of the areas, parks, and nature preserves as well as in legs. When in flight, the large white tail or flag, the backyards of rural and suburban residents. flipped up in the air can be the easiest way to The state’s only big game animal, it has pro- spot the deer. vided table fare for generations of the state’s Whitetails, especially in Ohio, are also well inhabitants from Native Americans to thou- known for their antlers. The whitetail buck grows sands of sportsmen and women today. its first set of antlers when it is a year old. Each However, the white-tailed deer hasn’t always year, a buck’s antlers begin growing in the been as abundant in the state as it is today. early spring. The developing antler is covered As a matter of fact, there was a period of time with a thick velvety skin rich with blood vessels (1904 to 1923) when the deer was absent in the and nerves. Decreasing day length in the late state. As Ohio was settled, habitat was eliminat- summer and early fall triggers many physical ed and hunting was unregulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series 570:233
    Vol. 570: 233–246, 2017 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published April 27 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12073 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPEN ACCESS Visitor noise at a nesting colony alters the behavior of a coastal seabird Rachel T. Buxton1,*, Reina Galvan1, Megan F. McKenna2, Cecilia L. White1, Victoria Seher3 1Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1474, USA 2Natural Sounds and Night Skies Division, National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado 80525, USA 3Golden Gate National Recreation Area, Fort Mason, San Francisco, California 94123, USA ABSTRACT: Exposure to park visitors can disrupt animal behavior. Management strategies often aim to eliminate direct human disturbance; however, elevated visitor noise levels may remain. Coastal seabird colonies frequently overlap with scenic locations, resulting in high visitor noise and potentially altered behavior, habitat use, and fitness. We examine the impact of visitor noise on Brandt’s cormorants Phalacrocorax penicillatus at Alcatraz Island, an important nesting site and one of California’s most visited attractions. We used paired acoustic and video recorders to investigate the relationship between visitor noise levels and the behavior and relative abundance of cormorants in colonies adjacent to and far from a heavily visited building. Visitors were not visible from the cormorant colonies. At cormorant colonies adjacent to the visited building, distur- bance-related behaviors increased with visitor noise. Conversely, there was no relationship be - tween behavior and visitor noise in colonies far from the visited building. Cormorant disturbance behavior increased and abundance decreased when gulls were present at colonies adjacent to the visited building, whereas there was no relationship between gulls and behavior or abundance at colonies far from the visited building.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Your Woodland for White-Tailed Deer St
    MANAGING YOUR WOODLAND FOR Managing Your Woodland for White-tailed Deer St. Paul, MN 55155-4040 Paul, St. Road 500 Lafayette SectionWildlife of Department of Natural Resources White-tailed deer are Minnesota’s most abundant Behavior and Home Range and popular big game animal with a population of White-tailed deer make seasonal changes in the White-tailed approximately one million. Through the early to mid- use and size of their home range in response to 2000’s, deer populations were at historic high levels and changing weather, food availability and cover needs. In have only recently been reduced through liberal hunting Minnesota’s northern forests an adult doe’s seasonal Deer regulations. They are found throughout Minnesota and home range is between 120-900 acres. Yearling does thrive in many diverse landscapes across the state’s more establish home ranges near their mother, while yearling than 79,000 square miles. Deer are very adaptable and bucks are more likely to establish home ranges some can be found in agricultural areas near river bottoms distance from their mother’s home range. In late and in farm woodlots, in open grass and brushland summer, adult does, fawns, and yearlings gather in landscapes, and in northern forests. An important aspect social groups, staying together through the winter and of maintaining desirable deer populations is employing spring. a hunting season harvest strategy that targets antlerless deer, and by providing the proper habitat, or food, cover, Adult bucks occupy 300-1,300 acre home ranges water, and space. By learning about the basics habitat and expand their home ranges during the fall rutting needs of deer, and through active habitat and hunting season.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting Breeding Territory Size and Placement of the Florida Grasshoper Sparrow (Ammodramus Savannarum Floridanus)
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2009 Factors Affecting Breeding Territory Size And Placement Of The Florida Grasshoper Sparrow (ammodramus Savannarum Floridanus) Jill Aldredge University of Central Florida Part of the Biology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Aldredge, Jill, "Factors Affecting Breeding Territory Size And Placement Of The Florida Grasshoper Sparrow (ammodramus Savannarum Floridanus)" (2009). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 4042. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/4042 FACTORS AFFECTING BREEDING TERRITORY SIZE AND PLACEMENT OF THE FLORIDA GRASSHOPPER SPARROW (AMMODRAMUS SAVANNARUM FLORIDANUS) by JILL NICOLE ALDREDGE B.S. University of Kansas, 2000 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Biology in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2009 ABSTRACT For most taxa, maximizing fitness depends on maintaining access to adequate resources. Territories provide exclusive use of resources for an individual or a family group, thus facilitating successful reproduction. The economic defensibility of a territory depends on the quality, abundance, and distribution of its resources as well as the amount of competition that an individual must endure to maintain exclusive access. The benefits of defense must outweigh the costs for territoriality to be profitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions Updated
    FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS MOUNTAIN LIONS - PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS, ADAPTATIONS & HABITS What is the difference between a mountain lion, a cougar and a puma? There are many common names given to these charismatic predators and mountain lion, cougar and puma are all correct for the species. The scientific name for this beautiful cat is Puma concolor (meaning: lion of one color). In South America, where they occur as far south as southern Chile, they are mostly known as puma. What are the characteristics of mountain lions? Mountain lions are North America’s big cat. They are solitary predators, mainly active at twilight and night (crepuscular and nocturnal). They have a tawny brown coat, with short course hair, light undersides, and an extremely long, black-tipped tail, about 2/3 their body length. Mountain lions have a relatively thin neck, small head with rounded ears, and a wide face with a distinctive short white muzzle ringed with darker fur. They have a fairly stocky build, with slightly longer back legs and big paws with sharp, retractable claws. They are the top predators in their ecosystems but are generally timid in their interaction with humans avoiding contact where possible. Mountain lions tend to run away or climb trees to escape danger. They do not roar like other large cats, rather making a variety of sounds more closely resembling domestic cats, but just louder. What are the differences between male and female mountain lions? Mountain lion male and females look the same, however, male’s testicles can be visible at the base of the tail.
    [Show full text]
  • Cougars (Mountain Lions)
    Cougars (Mountain Lions) Sleek and graceful, cougars (Puma concolor, Fig. 1) are solitary and secretive animals rarely seen in the wild. Also known as mountain lions or pumas, cougars are known for their strength, agility, and awesome ability to jump. Their exceptionally powerful legs enable them to leap 30 feet from a standstill, or to jump 15 feet straight up a cliff wall. A cougar’s overall strength and powerful jaws allow it to take down and drag prey larger than itself (Fig. 2). Cougars are the largest members of the cat family in North America. Adult males average approximately 140 pounds but in a perfect situation may weigh 180 pounds and measure 7-8 feet long from nose to tip of tail. Adult males stand about 30 inches tall at the shoulder. Adult female cougars average about 25 percent smaller than males. Cougars vary in color from reddish-brown to Figure 1. In rough terrain, cougar daybeds are usually in tawny (deerlike) to gray, with a black tip on their long a cave or a shallow nook on a cliff face or rock outcrop. tail. An average of two kittens are born every other year. (From Christensen, Mammals of the Pacific Northwest: A Cougars occur throughout Washington where suitable Pictorial Introduction.) cover and prey are found. The cougar population for the year 2002 was estimated to be 2,400 to 3,500 animals. Statewide, the cougar population is likely declining. The Department of Fish and Wildlife has nine management zones around the state designated for “maintain” or “decline,” and adjusts harvest levels accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Territory Tango
    PREPARATION: Make craft dough (or paper territories for Modification). CLASS TIME: one class period VOCABULARY: territory, forest interior species, fragmentation TEACHER’S MATERIALS: craft dough–enough for one lump of dough per student (or paper and compasses for Modification); round cookie cutters or similar items, such as jar lids–one for each GUIDE student; rolling pins or other similar items; waxed paper; a table knife NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS: MS-ESS3-4, MS-LS2-4, MS-LS2-5 ACTIVITY Territory Tango OVERVIEW the state not covered by prairie was covered by forests Students make craft dough models of bird territories to of oak and hickory, maple and basswood, as well as learn about habitat requirements of interior forest mixed broadleaved trees and conifers, and other forest species compared to edge species. types. In these great forest tracts lived many kinds of mammals and birds. CONCEPTS n People and some birds depend on forests for their Some wildlife species need large forest stands to find needs. food and shelter to successfully rear their young. Among n them are many species of birds, called interior forest Bird populations are affected by human impact on species, because they live in the interior of large forest- their habitat. ed areas. The ovenbird and scarlet tanager are exam- n Each forest management option may limit other for- ples of interior forest birds. est uses. n As Illinois was being settled, trees were cut for lumber Human use and management of forests affects bird and to clear the land for farming, much as people are populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lemurs of Madagascar – a Strategy for Their
    Cover photo: Diademed sifaka (Propithecus diadema), Critically Endangered. (Photo: Russell A. Mittermeier) Back cover photo: Indri (Indri indri), Critically Endangered. (Photo: Russell A. Mittermeier) Lemurs of Madagascar A Strategy for Their Conservation 2013–2016 Edited by Christoph Schwitzer, Russell A. Mittermeier, Nicola Davies, Steig Johnson, Jonah Ratsimbazafy, Josia Razafindramanana, Edward E. Louis Jr., and Serge Rajaobelina Illustrations and layout by Stephen D. Nash IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group Bristol Conservation and Science Foundation Conservation International This publication was supported by the Conservation International/Margot Marsh Biodiversity Foundation Primate Action Fund, the Bristol, Clifton and West of England Zoological Society, Houston Zoo, the Institute for the Conservation of Tropical Environments, and Primate Conservation, Inc. Published by: IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group, Bristol Conservation and Science Foundation, and Conservation International Copyright: © 2013 IUCN Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Inquiries to the publisher should be directed to the following address: Russell A. Mittermeier, Chair, IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202, USA Citation: Schwitzer C, Mittermeier RA, Davies N, Johnson S, Ratsimbazafy J, Razafindramanana J, Louis Jr. EE, Rajaobelina S (eds). 2013. Lemurs of Madagascar: A Strategy for Their Conservation 2013–2016. Bristol, UK: IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group, Bristol Conservation and Science Foundation, and Conservation International. 185 pp. ISBN: 978-1-934151-62-4 Illustrations: © Stephen D.
    [Show full text]
  • Territorial Defense Strategies in the Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis Cardinalis): Who Is the Bigger Threat?
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Master's Theses Fall 12-1-2015 Territorial Defense Strategies in the Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis): Who is the Bigger Threat? Kaylee M. Gentry University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Behavior and Ethology Commons, and the Ornithology Commons Recommended Citation Gentry, Kaylee M., "Territorial Defense Strategies in the Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis): Who is the Bigger Threat?" (2015). Master's Theses. 161. https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/161 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TERRITORIAL DEFENSE STRATEGIES IN THE NORTHERN CARDINAL (CARDINALIS CARDINALIS): WHO IS THE BIGGER THREAT? by Kaylee Michelle Gentry A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School and the Department of Biological Sciences at The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Approved: ________________________________________________ Dr. Frank Moore, Committee Chair Distinguished Professor, Biological Sciences ________________________________________________ Dr. Jodie Jawor, Thesis Director Associate Professor, Biological Sciences ________________________________________________ Dr. David Echevarria, Committee Member Associate Professor, Psychology ________________________________________________ Dr. Karen S. Coats Dean of the Graduate School December 2015 ABSTRACT TERRITORIAL DEFENSE STRATEGIES IN THE NORTHERN CARDINAL (CARDINALIS CARDINALIS): WHO IS THE BIGGER THREAT? by Kaylee Michelle Gentry December 2015 This thesis examines the use of defensive strategies in relation to territories year round in the northern cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis).
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of the Behavior and Ecology of the Sea Otter, Enhydra Lutris, in Montague Strait, Prince William Sound, Alaska
    SOME ASPECTS OF THE BEHAVIOR AMD ECOLOGY OF THE SEA OTTER, ENHYDRA LUTRIS, IN MONTAGUE STRAIT, PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND, ALASKA By Donald G~ Calkins SOME ASPECTS OF THE BEHAVIOR AND ECOLOGY OF THE SEA OTTER, ENHYDRA LUTRIS, IN MONTAGUE STRAIT, PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND, ALASKA APPROVED: Chairman Department Head APPROVED: ~ct Ud.. Date ~/f/72- Dean of the College of Biological ~ Sciences and Renewable Resources Vice President for Research and Advanced Study SOME ASPECTS OF THE BEHAVIOR AND ECOLOGY OF THE SEA OTTER, ENHYDRA LUTRIS, IN MONTAGUE STRAIT, PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND, ALASKA A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE By Donald G. Calkins, B.A. College, Alaska ~y~n ABSTRACT Distribution. feeding habits, and territoriality and general behavior of the sea otter (Enhydra lutris) were studied in Montague Strait, Prince William Sound, Alaska during May through September, 1971. Otters were found associated with certain features of the habitat such as: kelp beds (Nereocystis luetkeana), a lagoon, a favored feeding area, and a sheltered area. No otters were seen hauled out on land nor were any areas used exclusively by males or females seen. Montague Strait otters feed primarily on three groups of prey animals: pelecypods, decapods, and asteroids. The most important species in each of these groups are Saxidomus giganteus, Telmessus cheiragonus and Evasterias troschelii, respectively. The otters expended 81% of their feeding effort on pelecypods, 7~ on decapods, and 0.8% on asteroids. Clams were dug from the bottom by the otters, and opened with the aid of stones.
    [Show full text]