MANCP, Multi Annual National Control Plan, the Netherlands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MANCP, Multi Annual National Control Plan, the Netherlands MANCP Multi Annual National Control Plan Annual Report 2014 1 Contents Executive Summary of the MANCP Annual Report 2014 2 Chapter 1 Introduction 11 Chapter 2 Description and developments in the organisations involved 12 Chapter 3 Enforcement in the food chain 17 Chapter 4 Reports on areas of supervision in 2014 20 4.1 Introduction 20 4.2 Animal health – monitoring and control 21 4.3 Animal health – prevention 26 4.4 Animal welfare 31 4.5 Animal feed 37 4.6 Animal by-products 41 4.7 Meat chain 43 4.8 Meat products 47 4.9 Imports of veterinary consignments 50 4.10 Composite products 53 4.11 Fish, fish products and aquaculture 56 4.12 Dairy, eggs and egg products 60 4.13 Hotel/restaurant/catering and artisanal production 64 4.14 Know what you are buying 68 4.15 Contaminants, residues and GMOs in food 70 4.16 Microbiology 76 4.17 Nutrition and health/special food and drink 79 4.18 Plant health 84 4.19 Plant protection 87 4.20 Organic products 91 4.21 Geographical protection: PDO, PGI, TSG 93 Chapter 5 Audits 97 Chapter 6 NVWA Intelligence and Investigation Service (IOD) 102 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE MANCP ANNUAL REPORT 2014 This Multi Annual National Control Plan (MANCP) Annual Report is the eighth annual report on the Netherlands’ organisation and implementation of official controls on animal health, animal welfare, food and feed safety and plant health. The first MANCP annual report was drawn up in 2007. The most recent MANCP, the plan for the 2012-2016 period, was drawn up in 2011. On the publication of this report, the Netherlands has fulfilled its obligation to publish an annual report pursuant to Article 44 of the Control Regulation (EC) No 882/2004. 1 Developments NVWA improvement plan The objective of the improvement plan is to achieve the structural improvement of the NVWA’s supervision required to equip the Authority for its tasks in an adequate and future-resilient manner. The improvement plan consists of four parts: 1. Certification and Supervision This relates to a review of the organisation of the certification and supervision system. 2. Enhancement of the enforcement capacity This relates to the strengthening of a number of weak points resulting from insufficient capacity. 3. Improvement of the effectiveness of the organisation Structural improvements will be made to the quality and effectiveness of the service to enhance the NVWA as an organisation. 4. Financing The implementation of the improvement plan will be supported by structural additional contributions from both the Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, as well as from the business community. Food Confidence Task Force This Task Force was set up in March 2013, in response to the horse meat fraud at the beginning of 2013 that had revealed the need to implement firm measures to prevent the recurrence of incidents of this nature. The Task Force’s objective was to agree on measures designed to increase consumer confidence in food. The Task Force completed its work at the end of January 2015, and was then abolished. The most important result was the introduction of stringent criteria governing private quality systems. These criteria now enable the NVWA to ‘accept’ quality systems and use them as a source of information when performing its public supervision. The stringency of the procurement terms and conditions has been increased and harmonised with international umbrella systems, such as the British Retail Consortium (BRC) and International Food Standard (IFS), for which purpose agreements have been reached within the Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI). What is referred to as a ‘fraud module’ is being developed within this context. Wageningen University & Research centre (WUR), RIKILT and the Dutch business community are involved in the development of this module. Food establishment operators will adopt this module in their quality systems when imposing requirements on suppliers that will provide assurances for food integrity and traceability. Although progress has been made and results have been achieved, changes can only really be made when all businesses in the sector actually assume their responsibility for the safety and integrity of their products. Chain liability will then be essential. A number of international chains have already adopted chain liability and the Dutch sectors are expected to be prepared to follow this example. The greatest challenge lies in the change in the behaviour and culture of the relevant sectors. Abolition of the product boards The product boards were abolished on 1 January 2015. The public supervision duties in the animal and vegetable sectors that were assigned to the product boards were taken over by the NVWA and the Netherlands Enterprise Agency (RVO). The NVWA is responsible for the physical controls, supervision and enforcement of the duties assumed by the Authority. The RVO is responsible for the administrative control and implementation. 2 2 Effectiveness of controls The NVWA makes continual improvements to its risk-oriented enforcement strategy in all areas of its supervision. This is also an element of the NVWA’s improvement plan (see above). As the majority of the controls are managed by one central authority, new inspection strategies developed at the central location become available for all areas of supervision. Laboratory capacity for analyses has also been centralised, resulting in one laboratory for food safety, one laboratory for phytosanitary analyses and two laboratories for product safety. The introduction of administrative fines – for the Animals Act, in 2013 – has improved the effectiveness of controls, in particular in the event of non-compliance, and has greatly accelerated the enforcement process. Although insufficient qualitative indicators are currently available to compare the actual effectiveness of the controls with the targets, the first pilot trials with kebab in the hotel/restaurant/catering sector and hygienic slaughter in the meat sector have demonstrated that the use of indicators does yield quantifiable results. This procedure will be developed further. 3 Key data No. of inspections 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Identification and registration (I&R) 3,708 2,961 2,515 2,521 2,316 Animal heath - prevention 8,641 10,858 7,231 7,340 6,951 Animal welfare during transport 13,378 14,129 11,993 10,240 9,359 Animal feed 981 1,156 2,031 1,564 1,127 Animal by-products 6,668 5,936 5,712 4,307 3,655 Meat 1,803 2,883 2,320 3,022 2,772 Meat products 1,866 3,039 2,016 1,874 2,075 Imports of live animals and animal products 61,596 59,159 59,022 60,938 Industrial production (composite products) 3,340 3,871 5,502 5,361 3,274 Milk and dairy products 1,006 991 993 784 930 Egg sector 1,407 1,064 872 1,028 830 Hotel/restaurant/catering and retail 44,563 44,972 29,578 30,220 36,403 Labelling 1,050 422 178 80 168 Claims for foods for particular nutritional uses 2,207 1,350 1,865 1,734 1,862 Residues and contaminants in food 2,500 3,787 2,090 3,860 7,529 Veterinary medicines 952 689 2,502 1,156 620 Microbiological samples 26,897 18,209 15,184 Plant protection products 2,691 1,652 1,143 1,296 868 Organic products 5,069 5,258 4,064 4,878 4,908 Total 195,439 180,419 178,164 159,245 161,769 Certifications (in hours) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Meat 188,727 186,787 203,345 273,425 281,747 Fish 9,918 4,596 9,352 8,982 10,070 Plant health inspections No. of inspections 2012 2013 2014 Results for arable agriculture 38,756 34,752 36,696 Results for fruit and vegetables 101,050 124,379 117,768 Results for ornamental horticulture 177,052 181,854 184,068 Results for tree nurseries and green spaces 14,161 14,146 13,971 Total 331,019 355,131 352,503 3 4 Findings and analysis of non-compliance in 2014 Animal health – monitoring and control • At the beginning of 2014, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests carried out at two laying hen farms tested positive for low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI): H5N1 and H5N2. In November 2014, high pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) was encountered at five farms, namely three laying hen farms, one farm with ducks for slaughter and one broiler parent stock farm (H5N8 in all cases). All these farms were depopulated. Three farms were also preventively depopulated due to their contact with or location within a 1-km radius of an infected farm. • Outbreaks of American foulbrood afflicted four bee colonies. • The inspections of milk collection containers demonstrated a new infection with Q fever at one dairy goat farm. This farm had not previously been infected. • The tuberculosis control programme revealed that the majority of the suspected cases and the five confirmed cases of tuberculosis related to contact animals that originated from infected cattle farms in Ireland. Animal health - prevention • The I&R of Equidae continues to be a source of concern, as fraud involving horse passports leads to food safety issues. • It has transpired that the guarantees within the QLL (quality system livestock logistics) are insufficient to provide the necessary assurances for the system. This resulted in the withdrawal of the authorisation of the system and the associated supervision modalities on 1 March 2014. New quality systems were submitted for assessment at the end of 2014. Animal welfare • Compliance during animal transport remains a general point for concern. The percentage of non-compliances increased further from 16% in 2012 to 20% in 2013 and 24% in 2014.
Recommended publications
  • 2020 World Championship Cheese Contest
    2020 World Championship Cheese Contest Winners, Scores, Highlights March 3-5, 2020 | Madison, Wisconsin ® presented by the Cheese Reporter and the Wisconsin Cheese Makers Association World Cheese Contest ® Champions 2020 1998 1976 MICHAEL SPYCHER & PER OLESEN RYKELE SYTSEMA GOURMINO AG Denmark Netherlands Switzerland 1996 1974 2018 HANS DEKKERS GLEN WARD MICHEL TOUYAROU & Netherlands Wisconsin, USA SAVENCIA CHEESE USA France 1994 1972 JENS JENSEN DOMENICO ROCCA 2016 Denmark Italy TEAM EMMI ROTH USA Fitchburg, Wisconsin USA 1992 1970 OLE BRANDER LARRY HARMS 2014 Denmark Iowa, USA GERARD SINNESBERGER Gams, Switzerland 1990 1968 JOSEF SCHROLL HARVEY SCHNEIDER 2012 Austria Wisconsin, USA TEAM STEENDEREN Wolvega, Netherlands 1988 1966 DALE OLSON LOUIS BIDDLE 2010 Wisconsin, USA Wisconsin, USA CEDRIC VUILLE Switzerland 1986 1964 REJEAN GALIPEAU IRVING CUTT 2008 Ontario, Canada Ontario, Canada MICHAEL SPYCHER Switzerland 1984 1962 ROLAND TESS VINCENT THOMPSON 2006 Wisconsin, USA Wisconsin, USA CHRISTIAN WUTHRICH Switzerland 1982 1960 JULIE HOOK CARL HUBER 2004 Wisconsin, USA Wisconsin, USA MEINT SCHEENSTRA Netherlands 1980 1958 LEIF OLESEN RONALD E. JOHNSON 2002 Denmark Wisconsin, USA CRAIG SCENEY Australia 1978 1957 FRANZ HABERLANDER JOHN C. REDISKE 2000 Austria Wisconsin, USA KEVIN WALSH Tasmania, Australia Discovering the Winning World’s Best Dairy Results Wisconsin Cheese Makers Association was honored to host an international team of judges and an impressive array of samples of 2020 cheese, butter, yogurt and dairy ingredients from around the globe at the 2020 World Championship Cheese Contest March 3-5 in Madison. World Champion It was our largest event ever, with a breath-taking 3,667 entries from Michael Spycher, Mountain 26 nations and 36 American states.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Iodised Salt in Cheese Manufacturing to Improve Iodine Status in the UK
    Use of iodised salt in cheese manufacturing to improve iodine status in the UK by Suruchi Pradhan A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Central Lancashire November/2019 1 STUDENT DECLARATION FORM Type of Award Doctor of Philosophy in Nutrition School School of Sports and Health Sciences Sections marked * delete as appropriate 1. Concurrent registration for two or more academic awards *I declare that while registered as a candidate for the research degree, I have not been a registered candidate or enrolled student for another award of the University or other academic or professional institution 2. Material submitted for another award *I declare that no material contained in the thesis has been used in any other submission for an academic award and is solely my own work. Signature of Candidate ______ ________________________________________________ Print name: Suruchi Pradhan ____________________________________________________________ 2 Abstract Iodine is an essential trace mineral. Iodine deficiency during pregnancy can lead to adverse postnatal consequences such as impaired mental development, reduced intelligence scores and impaired motor skills in the offspring of the deficient women (Khazan et al., 2013, Rayman et al, 2008). There is growing evidence in the UK of low dietary iodine intakes and potential iodine deficiency in vulnerable populations (pregnant women and women of child bearing age group) (Rayman and Bath, 2015, Vanderpump et al., 2011) and a paucity of information on the iodine content of food products. In developing countries where iodine deficiency is widespread, salt has successfully been used as a vehicle for iodine fortification, however iodised salt is not widely available in UK supermarkets and there are valid health concerns about promoting salt intake.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cheese Markets of the Netherlands by Lee Foster
    The Cheese Markets of the Netherlands by Lee Foster Few experiences satisfy the person who savors food and drink more than a journey to the source, the place where a favorite wine, cheese, or fruit is produced. The encounter imparts a knowledge of terrain and an appreciation of techniques used to make the prized food or drink. No book can teach this experience; no number of trips to the local delicatessen or bottle shop can equal it. For the appreciator of cheese, Dutch cheese is one of the gustatory glories of the Netherlands. The place to start is a good cheese store in Amsterdam. Beyond Amsterdam, you can visit the cheese markets at Alkmaar and at Gouda. You can also visit a cheese-making farm, Clara Maria, near Amsterdam. Details can be easily arranged by the Netherlands Board of Tourism office, www.holland.com. Cheese Shops in Amsterdam Cheese shops in Amsterdam, such as Abraham Kef’s, 192 Marninxstraat, are the places to make your first encounter with Dutch cheeses. At Kef’s you can make a tasting ceremony of cheese and wine. First, try a slice of Gouda, which is 60 percent of all the cheese produced in the Netherlands. Half of this Gouda is exported, making the Dutch one of the world’s largest exporters of cheese. Ask for a piece of Young Gouda, about three months old, which is imported to the U.S. labeled Young or Mild Gouda. Most Goudas are whole milk cheeses with a fat content of 48 percent. The Young Gouda has a creamy, buttery taste.
    [Show full text]
  • DAIRY at the HIGHEST LEVEL on the Economic Importance and Quality of the Dutch Dairy Sector Summary
    DAIRY AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL On the economic importance and quality of the Dutch dairy sector Summary Quality and cooperation The Dutch dairy sector largely owes its strong global market position to high, consistent quality and a capacity for innovation. From our world-famous Gouda and Edam cheeses to milk powder and high-quality ingredients: dairy from the Netherlands is synonymous with the highest quality. This quality is the result of Dutch dairy farmers’ and producers’ years of experience and craftsmanship, as well as close cooperation with knowledge institutes and the government. Take a look behind the scenes of a high-quality food industry with a unique quality system. 2 Dairy at the highest level Dairy at the highest level 3 Foreword/Contents Dutch dairy at the highest level We never really talk about quality. We simply take continuously working on improving the quality of euros in turnover. This is a stable industry, which is for granted the fact that our products are in order our products, and safeguarding our processes and deeply rooted in Dutch society. That makes the every day. That’s simply a precondition. Consumers making them more sustainable. We all do this dairy sector robust. Precisely because of this we can must be able to trust that every Dutch dairy together. Not only dairy companies united in the handle crises, such as the coronavirus, trade wars or product is safe. They should also know that every Dutch Dairy Association (Nederlandse Zuivel fi nancial turmoil. The ongoing attention we pay to piece of cheese or packet of yogurt will have the Organisatie, NZO), but also dairy farmers, the the quality of our products and our production same familiar taste, time after time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Labelling of Food in Ireland 2002
    The labelling of food in Ireland 2002 Item Type Report Authors Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI) Rights Food Safety Authority of Ireland Download date 26/09/2021 09:26:40 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10147/44813 Find this and similar works at - http://www.lenus.ie/hse The Labelling of Food in Ireland 2002 in Ireland The Labelling of Food The Labelling of Food Sábháilteachta Bia na hÉireann in Ireland 2002 Mainistreach, Sráid na Mainistreach Íocht., ha Cliath 1 300 01 fsai-label Cover inside 19/3/02 12:05 pm Page 1 The Labelling of Food in Ireland 2002 Published by: Food Safety Authority of Ireland Abbey Court Lower Abbey Street Dublin 1 Telephone:+353 1 817 1300 Facsimile: +353 1 817 1301 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.fsai.ie ©2002 ISBN 0-9540754-0-4 17221-fsaiLabellingReport-Sec 1 22/3/02 10:42 am Page 1 CONTENTS FOREWORD 1 1. INTRODUCTION TO IRISH AND EUROPEAN LAW 3 1.1 Irish legislative process 3 1.2 European Union legislative process 3 1.3 Laws of the European Union 4 1.4 Irish law implementing European Union law 5 1.5 Commission Green and White Papers 5 2. INTRODUCTION TO LABELLING 7 2.1 Where can I find the rules on labelling? 7 2.1.1 General labelling provisions for foodstuffs 7 2.1.2 Other labelling requirements for specific foodstuffs 7 2.1.3 The Codex Alimentarius Commission 8 2.2 How to use this guide 8 3. GENERAL LABELLING REQUIREMENTS IN IRELAND 9 3.1 Scope 9 3.1.1 When do the labelling rules apply? 9 3.2 Definitions 9 3.3 General requirements – labelling must not mislead the consumer 10 3.4 Language 11 3.5
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Benefits and Risks of Organic Raw Milk Cheese
    Evaluating the benefits Master’s and risks of organic raw Thesis milk cheese. Challenges in the production of 2014 organic cheeses made from raw milk. Picture was taken at Caws Teifi Cheese, Wales Szabolcs Elek Student ID: 201301852 Supervisor: Mette Krogh Larsen Master in Organic Agriculture Department of Food Science – and Food Systems, University of Aarhus University Hohenheim (D) & Aarhus University (DK) 2014.10.10. Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Materials and methods ....................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter I. - Regulation of raw and organic milk ...................................................................................... 2 Basic requirements for producing raw milk ........................................................................................ 2 Producing raw milk cheese .................................................................................................................. 3 Processing facilities ............................................................................................................................. 3 Exception ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Microbiological characteristics of raw-milk cheese ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Varieties of Cheese
    Research Library Bulletins 4000 - Research Publications 1980 Varieties of cheese T A. Morris Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/bulletins Part of the Dairy Science Commons, and the Food Processing Commons Recommended Citation Morris, T A. (1980), Varieties of cheese. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia, Perth. Bulletin 4066. This bulletin is brought to you for free and open access by the Research Publications at Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletins 4000 - by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CA1 Department of Agriculture, Western Australia. BULLETIN 4066 AGDEX 416/80 Varieties of cheese by T. A. Morris Chief, Division of Dairying and Food Technology VARIETIES OF CHEESE by T. A. Morris Chief, Division of Dairying and Food Technology While Cheddar cheese is by far the main type as far RIPENED CHEESE English speaking countries concerned, it is only as are Cheese ripened by bacteria one of a large number of varieties of cheese which are becoming more universal in production and con- This group includes those cheeses in which most of sumption. In other than English speaking countries the ripening and flavour development is a result of the Cheddar cheese is almost unknown and yet the con- action of bacteria within the cheese. In considering sumption of cheese in some of these countries is very these cheeses it is found that they can be formed into much greater. two sub-groups on the basis of the presence or absence of round holes known as "eyes" in the cheese.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Manual for U.S. Cheese
    Reference Manual for U.S. Cheese CONTENTS Introduction U.S. Cheese Selection Acknowledgements ................................................................................. 5 5.1 Soft-Fresh Cheeses ........................................................................53 U.S. Dairy Export Council (USDEC) ..................................................... 5 5.2 Soft-Ripened Cheeses ..................................................................58 5.3 Semi-Soft Cheeses ....................................................................... 60 The U.S. Dairy Industry and Export Initiatives 5.4 Blue-Veined Cheeses ................................................................... 66 1.1 Overview of the U.S. Dairy Industry ...........................................8 5.5 Gouda and Edam ........................................................................... 68 1.2 Cooperatives Working Together (CWT) ................................. 10 5.6 Pasta Filata Cheeses ..................................................................... 70 The U.S. Cheese Industry 5.7 Cheeses for Pizza and Blends .....................................................75 5.8 Cheddar and Colby ........................................................................76 2.1 Overview ............................................................................................12 5.9 Swiss Cheeses .................................................................................79 2.2 Safety of U.S. Cheese and Dairy Products ...............................15 5.10
    [Show full text]
  • Cheese in the European Union
    Cheese in the European Union The EU produced 10.5 m t (million tonnes) of cheese in 2019 EU cheese production 2009-2019 m t 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Source: Eurostat Types of cheese produced in EU Fresh Soft Semi soft Hard Blue Within these broad categories there is a lot of variation in colour, texture, consistency and taste. How long the cheese is aged for, and under what conditions, is key to the final outcome. For example, some cheeses are wrapped in cloth and left to mature in caves, others are repeatedly washed with brine or alcohol (washed-rind or smear-ripened), while others are sealed in wax. Various bacteria can be introduced during production to give the cheese a soft, bloomy rind (like Camembert), or air holes known as ‘eyes’ (as with Danish Harvati), or green-blue veins (such as French Roquefort or Italian Gorgonzola). These latter two cheeses have been granted a Protected Designation of Origin (or PDO) under an EU quality scheme for food and wine, aimed at protecting traditional production processes and unique regional products. There is also a Protected Geographical Indication (PGI), which emphasises the unique geographical origin of a cheese or other foodstuff. The type of milk used also influences the final flavour of cheese 2% 2% 4% Cow’s milk: 9,658 m t (92% of total cheese production) Sheep milk: 231 m t (2% of total cheese production) Goat milk: 203 m t (2% of total cheese production) Other (buffalo and mixed milks): 444 m t 92% (4% of total cheese production) Source: Eurostat • Cow’s milk is mild, sweet and creamy – 92% of the EU’s cheese is made from pure cow’s milk • Sheep milk is more tangy and grassy – just over 2% of EU cheese is made from pure sheep milk • Goat milk has the most ‘farmyard’ aroma and taste – just under 2% of EU cheese is made from pure goat milk • 4% Cheeses made from ‘other’ milks make up the remaining 4% of EU cheeses, such as buffalo or even reindeer milk, or a mixture of milks.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Beemsterkaas'
    European Commission THE FIFTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME 1998-2002 QUALITY OF LIFE AND MANAGEMENT OF LIVING RESOURCES “Marketing Sustainable Agriculture: An analysis of the potential role of new food supply chains in sustainable rural development” SUS-CHAIN QLK5-CT-2002-01349 ‘BeemsterKaas’ Marketing quality and image Case study report By Natasja Oerlemans Eric Hees SUS-CHAIN deliverable no. 16.1b ‘BeemsterKaas’ Marketing quality and image WP5 Case Study Report By Natasja Oerlemans Eric Hees Suschain WP5 - Case study report Beemsterkaas: marketing quality and image Table of Content Summary .................................................................................................................... v 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objective ...............................................................................................................1 1.2 Methodology...........................................................................................................2 2 The Context: The Dutch Dairy Chain ................................................................... 3 2.1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................3 2.2 The dairy chain in figures .........................................................................................3 2.3 Retail and consumption ............................................................................................7 2.4
    [Show full text]
  • EU Quality Schemes: Market Potential for Fresh and Processed Products
    International comparison of product supply chains in the agri-food sector: determinants of their competitiveness and performance on EU and international markets WORKING PAPER N 8, September 2014 EU Quality Schemes: market potential for fresh and processed products Edited by Cornelia-Florentina Alboiu, Dan-Marius Voicilas Abstract The working paper provides an analysis of “new markets” in selected EU countries. The recent situation, development as well as challenges and tendencies on the markets for products produced and processed according to the EU quality schemes (organic products, protected designation of origin (PDO), protected geographical indication (PGI), and traditional specialties guaranteed (TSG)) will be discussed in the paper in order to identify the market potential for those products. In particular, several case studies of specific EU markets are included. There are wide variations across the EU as to the size of the current market and likely future potential for organic food as well as PDI and PGO products. Of the countries considered, geographical indications are most developed in Italy, but remain of peripheral importance in some established (e.g. UK) and new member states (e.g. Romania). In some countries, were the local market is restricted by low purchasing power, development of the organic sector relies solely on export sales (e.g. Serbia). In established member states the situation of the organic sector has been rather mixed. In Germany sales continue to grow, albeit at a slower rate than in the mid-2000s, while the UK experienced a sharp downturn after 2008. The results of our analysis show that the market was heavily influenced by EU policy (especially by financial support) and the global crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheese Markets of the Netherlands, Alkmaar and Gouda
    Cheese Markets of the Netherlands, Alkmaar and Gouda Dutch Cheese – Images by Lee Foster – Images by Lee Foster by Lee Foster Few experiences satisfy the person who savors food and drink more than a journey to the source, the place where a favorite wine, cheese, or fruit is produced. The encounter imparts a knowledge of terrain and an appreciation of techniques used to make the prized food or drink. No book can teach this experience; no number of trips to the local delicatessen or bottle shop can equal it. For the appreciator of cheese, Dutch cheese is one of the gustatory glories of the Netherlands. The place to start is a good cheese store in Amsterdam. Beyond Amsterdam, you can visit the cheese markets at Alkmaar and at Gouda. You can also visit a cheese-making farm, Clara Maria, near Amsterdam. Details can be easily arranged by the Netherlands Board of Tourism office, www.holland.com. Cheese Shops in Amsterdam Cheese shops in Amsterdam, such as Abraham Kef’s, 192 Marninxstraat, are the places to make your first encounter with Dutch cheeses. At Kef’s you can make a tasting ceremony of cheese and wine. First, try a slice of Gouda, which is 60 percent of all the cheese produced in the Netherlands. Half of this Gouda is exported, making the Dutch one of the world’s largest exporters of cheese. Ask for a piece of Young Gouda, about three months old, which is imported to the U.S. labeled Young or Mild Gouda. Most Goudas are whole milk cheeses with a fat content of 48 percent.
    [Show full text]