DOCSLIB.ORG

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Final Environmental Impact Report SCH No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Final Environmental Impact Report SCH No City of Tehachapi CITY OF TEHACHAPI GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Final Environmental Impact Report SCH No. 2009101084 Prepared for: City of Tehachapi Community Development Department 115 South Robinson Street Tehachapi, California 93561 Contact: David James Community Development Director Prepared by: IMPACT SCIENCES, INC. 234 E. Colorado Boulevard, Suite 205 Pasadena, California 91101 April 2012 TEHACHAPI GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Final Environmental Impact Report SCH No. 2009101084 Prepared for: City of Tehachapi Community Development Department 115 South Robinson Street Tehachapi, California 93561 Prepared by: Impact Sciences, Inc. 234 East Colorado Boulevard, Suite 205 Pasadena, California 91101 April 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................1.0-1 2.0 Executive Summary ...............................................................................................................................2.0-1 3.0 Responses to Comments........................................................................................................................3.0-1 State and Regional Agencies Letter 1 State of California, Department of Transportation, District 9, March 14, 2012 ........3.0-3 Letter 2 State of California, Public Utilities Commission, February 13, 2012........................3.0-13 4.0 Additions and Corrections to Draft EIR..............................................................................................4.0-1 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 2.0-1 Residential Development ......................................................................................................................2.0-2 2.0-2 Population ...............................................................................................................................................2.0-3 2.0-3 Non-Residential Floor Area (Square Feet) ..........................................................................................2.0-3 2.0-4 Employment by Sector...........................................................................................................................2.0-4 2.0-5 Summary of Impacts..............................................................................................................................2.0-8 Impact Sciences, Inc. i City of Tehachapi General Plan Update Final EIR 1135.001 April 2012 1.0 INTRODUCTION CEQA REQUIREMENTS In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), specifically State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15088, 15089, and 15132, the City of Tehachapi has prepared the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed City of Tehachapi General Plan Update project. A Final EIR is defined by Section 15362(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines as “containing the information contained in the Draft EIR; comments, either in verbatim or in summary received in the review process; a list of persons commenting; and the responses of the Lead Agency to the comments received.” Section 3.0 of this document contains all comments received on the Draft EIR during the document’s 45‐day public review period of January 31, 2012 to March 15, 2012. Responses to comments received by all interested parties have been prepared and are included in this document. Also, as necessary, corrections and additions are included in the response to comments received on the document, or as initiated by the Lead Agency (City of Tehachapi) on the Draft EIR. This document, along with the Draft EIR (incorporated by reference), make up the Final EIR as defined in the State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15132, which states that: The Final EIR shall consist of: (a) The Draft EIR or a revision of the Draft. (b) Comments and recommendations received on the Draft EIR either verbatim or in summary. (c) A list of persons, organizations, and public agencies comment on the Draft EIR. (d) The responses of the Lead Agency to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process. (e) Any other information added by the Lead Agency.” USES OF THE FINAL EIR The Final EIR allows the public and the decision makers an opportunity to review revisions to the Draft EIR, the response to comments, and other components of the EIR, such as the Mitigation Monitoring Program, prior to approval of the project. The Final EIR serves as the environmental document to support approval of the proposed project, either in whole or in part. Impact Sciences, Inc. 1.0-1 City of Tehachapi General Plan Update Final EIR 1135.001 April 2012 1.0 Introduction After completing the Final EIR, and before approving the project, the Lead Agency must make the following three certifications as required by Section 15090 of the State CEQA Guidelines: That the Final EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA; That the Final EIR was presented to the decision‐making body of the Lead Agency, and that the decision‐making body reviewed and considered the information in the Final EIR prior to approving the project; and That the Final EIR reflects the Lead Agency’s independent judgment and analysis. Additionally, pursuant to Section 15093(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines, when a Lead Agency approves a project that would result in significant unavoidable impacts that are disclosed in the Final EIR, the agency must state its reasons for supporting the approved action in writing. This Statement of Overriding Considerations is supported by substantial information in the record, which includes the Final EIR. Since the proposed project would result in significant unavoidable impacts, the decision‐making body (Planning Commission) would be required to adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations if it approves the proposed project. These certifications, along with the Facts, Findings, and the Statement of Overriding Considerations will be included in a separate document. Both the Final EIR and the Findings are submitted to the decision- making body for consideration of the proposed project. REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT EIR Text changes are intended to clarify or correct information in the Draft EIR in response to comments received on the document, or as initiated by Lead Agency (City) staff. Text changes are included in this Final EIR in Section 3. SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed General Plan transitions the 1999 General Plan from a land use-based city planning approach to a physical design-based approach. The physically based approach recognizes that while land use is an important factor in city planning, it is not the only or most important factor that comprises a community, as is typical of the land use-based approach. Overall, implementation of the proposed General Plan at buildout would result in the addition of approximately 2,012 dwelling units, 766,000 square feet of commercial space, and approximately 759,000 square feet of industrial space. In addition, implementation of the proposed General Plan would result in the addition of 206.6 acres of park/open space, 454.83 acres of rights-of-way, and a conversion of Impact Sciences, Inc. 1.0-2 City of Tehachapi General Plan Update Final EIR 1135.001 April 2012 1.0 Introduction approximately 2,414 acres of agricultural space to residential, commercial, and industrial space. It should be noted that, portions of this agricultural space are being used for agriculture but do not contain the soil types necessary for it to be classified as agricultural land. SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES ANALYZED IN THE DRAFT EIR As indicated above, project alternatives should feasibly be able to attain “most of the basic objectives of the project” (Section 15126.6(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines), even though implementation of the project alternatives might, to some degree, impede the attainment of those objectives or be more costly (Section 15126.6(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines). The proposed project objectives include thefollowing: Identifies and articulates the community’s vision for the City’s next 100 years with an initial planning horizon of 2035; Recasts the 1999 General Plan to incrementally generate a place that fulfills the community’s 2035 vision; Sets forth the principles, goals, strategies, objectives and policies that will help achieve the community vision, establishing the basis for evaluating choices and making near- and long-term decisions to maintain the “small-town character” and to preserve and enhance that character; Use form-based code to allow for a mix and range of land use types to efficiently use land resources; Use form-based code to enhance walkability and decrease dependency on vehicle trips; Use form-based code to maintain small-town character; Use form-based code to provide flexibility of building types within pre-set parameters; Defines integrated strategies for economic development, environmental sustainability, transportation, land use, housing and community design to help achieve the City’s vision; and Prioritizes actions to advance ongoing implementation. Therefore, for purposes of this alternatives analysis, to compare the merits of an alternative’s ability to reduce environmental impacts, and meet the project’s objectives, a No Project Alternative, a Reduced Intensity Alternative, and a Traditional General Plan Alternative were defined and analyzed. Environmentally Superior Alternative In general, the environmentally superior alternative as defined by CEQA should minimize adverse impacts to the project site and its surrounding environment. Of the alternatives
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Economic Diversification Plan for East Kern County
    FEBRUARY 2017 ECONOMIC DIVERSIFICATION PLAN EAST KERN COUNTY, CA KERN COUNTY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TIP Strategies would like to thank the many individuals who participated in the creation of this Economic Diversification Plan. We are especially grateful to the members of the East Kern Economic Alliance who contributed their time and input throughout this planning process. Their expertise helped us gain a deep understanding of the region’s range of assets and opportunities. We are also thankful for the US Department of Defense Office of Economic Adjustment for their visionary investments and support which helped make this project a reality. We also want to thank the leadership and staff of Kern County and the Kern EDC for their essential support, guidance, and feedback during the development of this plan. EAST KERN ECONOMIC ALLIANCE KEY STAKEHOLDERS Richard Chapman, President & CEO Jennifer Wood, Mayor Gary Parsons, Economic Kern Economic Development California City Development Manager Corporation City of Ridgecrest Karina Drees, CEO and General Bill Deaver, Michelle Vance, Economic Manager Edwards Community Alliance Development Coordinator Mojave Air & Spaceport City of Tehachapi Kimberly Maevers, President Kelly Bearden, Director Ryan Rush, Field Representative Greater Antelope Valley Economic CSU-Bakersfield SBDC Kern County Board of Supervisors, Alliance 2nd District KERN COUNTY PROJECT TEAM Supervisor Zach Scrivner, Chairman of the Kern County Board of Supervisors & 2nd District Supervisor Teresa Hitchcock, Assistant County Administrative
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Study for the Oak Tree Village Specific Plan
    115 S. ROBINSON STREET CITY OF TEHACHAPI TEHACHAPI, CA 93561 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PHONE: (661) 822-2200 PLANNING DEPARTMENT FAX: (661) 822-8559 Web Address: http://www.liveuptehachapi.com/ NOTICE OF PREPARATION DATE: September 22, 2016 TO: See Attached Mailing List FROM: City of Tehachapi Development Services, Planning Department Attn: Trevor Hawkes 117 S. Robinson Street Tehachapi, CA 93561 (661) 822-2200; [email protected] SUBJECT: NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The City of Tehachapi, Development Services – Planning Department, as Lead Agency pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15052, has required that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15161 be prepared for the project identified below. The City’s Planning Department solicits the views of your agency as to the scope and content of the environmental information which is germane to your agency’s statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed project. Your agency will need to use the EIR prepared by our agency when considering your permit or other approval of projects. Due to the limits mandated by State law, your response must be received by October 22, 2016 at 5pm. PROJECT TITLE: Oak Tree Village Specific Plan. PROJECT LOCATION: The project site is located on approximately 210 acres immediately northeast of Burnett Road, on the northern side of SR-58 (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers [APNs] 223-040-12, 223-040-13 and 223-040-14) in the City of Tehachapi, California. The site is located on the southern half of Section 15 of Township 32 South, Range 33 East of the Mount Diablo Base and Meridian (T32S, R33E, S15, MDB&M).
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue
    Volume 6 Issue 1 June/July/August 2013 2013 PSSA Siskiyou Trip PSSA Picnic August 18 by Marlene See Upcoming Events Page 6 for details: Nelson Great conditions, friendly folks and a comfortable facility contributed to the success of the 2013 PSSA sojourn to Siskiyou County last week. Un- der the leadership of trip organizer, Wayne Ginther, we traveled south on I-5 for ten hours to the Montague Rohrer airport near Yreka, CA. Participating members included: Wayne, Stefan Perrin, Terry Crippen, Tim Heneghan, Dave Kremers and Curt Chenoweth and Marlene Nel- son. Three and a half to four hour flights were the norm and although conditions were not con- ducive to flights above Mt. Shasta, several flights Photo by Tim Heneghan across the base occurred. In past years we have operated at Siskiyou Country airport without the benefit of shade or facilities, this year the re- gional contest was held earlier this month at Montague so we decided to move our PSSA base to this much narrower and shorter facility. Everyone was grateful for the shade, green grass, restroom facilities and cold beer after flying. The landing lights were lowered each day to preclude interference with glider wings on landing or takeoff. It worked well for us—all takeoffs and landings were Runway 33 with the exception of Tuesday when the gliders departed run- way 15 in 20 K winds. The resident Pawnee towplane pulled us to Gunsight Ridge which provided good access to Soaring Society of America News In This Issue In the August issue of Soaring, members tives are now sent by e-mail only! will learn The Thrill of Flying Out, in an In order to receive these essential AD's, July PSSA Siskiyou Trip ....1 New PSSA Members …… 2 essay by Greg Swiderski, embellishing in aircraft owners (individuals, clubs or cor- Guess That Sailplane …….4 the risks and rewards to be gained from porations) must update their -e mail with Maintenance Report …….
    [Show full text]
  • Storm Data Storm Data
    FEBRUARY 1998 VOLUME 40 NUMBER 2 STORMSTORM DATADATA AND UNUSUAL WEATHER PHENOMENA WITH LATE REPORTS AND CORRECTIONS NATIONAL OCEANIC AND NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER noaa ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION DATA, AND INFORMATION SERVICE ASHEVILLE, N.C. Cover: The frame of a Recreational Vehicle in the Ponderosa RV Park was blown into a tree by the tornadic wind speed of an F3 category (wind speeds 158-206 mph on the Fujita Scale) tornado. The tornado struck late at night, severely damaging a mobile home park and an RV park, killing 42 people and injuring another 206. See page 5 for details. (Photograph courtesy of The National Weather Service, Melbourne, Florida) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Outstanding Storms of the Month ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena ………………………………………………………………………….. 7 Reference Notes …………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 179 STORM DATA (ISSN 0039-1972) National Climatic Data Center Editor: Stephen Del Greco Assistant Editor: Stuart Hinson STORM DATA is prepared, funded, and distributed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The Outstanding Storms of the Month section is prepared by the Data Operations Branch of the National Climatic Data Center. The Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena narratives and Hurricane/Tropical Storm summaries are prepared by the National Weather Service. Monthly and annual statistics and summaries of tornado and lightning events resulting in deaths, injuries, and damage are compiled by cooperative efforts between the National Climatic Data Center and the Storm Prediction Center. STORM DATA contains all confirmed information on storms available to our staff at the time of publication. However, due to difficulties inherent in the collection of this type of data, it is not all-inclusive.
    [Show full text]
  • Calpilots Board Contact List 10 Safety Standards
    July/August 2011 Inside this issue: Serving Pilots Of California With Pride Presidents Corner 2 Hawthorne Airport and LAX in Safety Review Wind Turbines 2 FAA rule hurts Hawthorne air- ing into neighboring Los Ange- local aviation experts believe Test Show That Proposed 3 port's business - Aircraft traffic at les International Airport. the FAA has created a more 4G-LTE-satellite Network Hawthorne Municipal Airport has dangerous situation. SB619 Moves Forward 5 dropped off this year, but not Pilots trying to land at Haw- because of the poor economy or thorne's Jack Northrop Field lack of interest from pilots. since September have either "People are flying from across Update at Whiteman Airport 5 been diverted to other nearby the country, and they are get- Business at the airport was grow- airports or told to fly in circles ting a few miles away when Cessna AD Seat Rails 6 ing steadily after years of severe when air traffic at LAX is they are told: `You can't get recession-related setbacks - until heavy. in,' and they aren't given a GA leaders seek relief 6 last fall, when Federal Aviation reason," said Levi Stockton, Administration officials changed As a result, Hawthorne airport owner of Advanced Air charter CalPilots Board Contact List 10 safety standards. businesses report that they service at the airport. "It's cre- are losing tens of thousands of ated a very dangerous situa- California Pilot PAC 11 The change made it difficult for dollars a month in fuel reve- tion." planes to fly into Hawthorne at nue, hangar rentals and other the same time as flights are com- service fees.
    [Show full text]
  • Designer John Monnett Returns to the Motorglider Scene with the Two-Place Xenos. by MURRY ROZANSKY
    Soaring with Sonex Designer John Monnett returns to the motorglider scene with the two-place Xenos. BY MURRY ROZANSKY 8 KITPLANES APRIL 2005 WWW.KITPLANES.COM The long-wing Xenos motorglider (front) and Y- tail Waiex are the latest designs from Sonex, Ltd. PHOTOS: RICHARD VANDER MEULEN little yellow slot car with and he quickly followed with a two-seat wings. That’s how one visitor version. Both were of mixed construc- SONEX LTD. XENOS A to Sonex engineer Pete Buck’s tion, featuring an aluminum wing and a Price (excluding quickbuild options) . .$18,995 hangar described the company’s Xenos steel-tube fuselage covered with cloth. Estimated completed price . .$30,500 motorglider. That’s a strange thing to Their longevity speaks to the popularity Estimated build time . .1000 hours Number flying (at press time) . .2 say about an airplane with a 45-foot of the designs; plans for both are still Powerplant . .AeroVee 2180 wingspan and a length of 19 feet 9 available today from Great Plains Air- 80 hp @ 3300 rpm inches. But on closer inspection (and craft Supply (www.greatplainsas.com). Propeller . .Sensenich two-blade fixed-pitch Powerplant options . .Jabiru 3300, 120 hp following a flight in the new design), I Monnett’s interest in soaring led to think that visitor may well have cap- the design of the Monerai, a compact Airframe tured its spirit. steel-tube sailplane with a fiberglass pod, Wingspan . .45 ft 9 in Wing loading . .8.07 lb/sq ft Why? Well, the bright yellow aluminum wing and a V-tail. The Moni Fuel capacity .
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Tehachapi
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Transportation 3.8 Transportation This section describes the existing transportation systems in the study area, including major roadways, modes of public transportation, and air travel. For this section, the study area includes the Covered Lands and the surrounding roadways used to reach the Covered Lands. The study area is divided into northern and southern regions. The northern region is in Kern County and the southern region is in the northwest part of Los Angeles County. 3.8.1 Major Roadways The study area is encircled by a network of Federal and state highways. Access to the Covered Lands from the south is provided by Interstate 5 (I-5), which runs north-south along the southwestern edge of the Covered Lands, and by State Route (SR) 138, which runs east-west to the south of the Covered Lands. Access from the north is provided by SR 223 and SR 58, which are located several miles to the north and transect the Covered Lands near the Veteran’s Administration cemetery site. SR 138 runs east-west, generally parallel to, but several miles south of, the southern portion of the Covered Lands. Access from the east is provided by SR 58 and SR 14, which runs north-south, far to the east of the Covered Lands, and connects SR 58 with SR 138. Major roadways are identified on Figure 3.6-1. There is no public access in most of the Covered Lands except along public roadways adjacent to and including I-5 from approximately the Lebec Road interchange to the Fort Tejon interchange and along SR 223.
    [Show full text]
  • This Month's Meeting
    THE LEADING EDGE NEWSLETTER OF MUROC EAA CHAPTER 1000 Voted to Top Ten Newsletters, 1997, 1998 McKillop Award Competition President Gary Aldrich 661-609-0942 Vice-President George Gennuso 661-265-0333 Secretary Kent Troxel 661-947-2647 Treasurer Doug Dodson 661-256-7276 Newsletter Editor Russ Erb 661-256-3806 http://www.eaa1000.av.org July 2003 Chapter 1000 meets monthly on the third Tuesday of the month in the USAF Test Pilot School Scobee Auditorium, Edwards AFB, CA at 1700 or 5:00 PM, whichever you prefer. Any changes of meeting venue will be announced in the newsletter. Offer void where prohibited. Your mileage may vary. Open to military and civilian alike. This Month’s Meeting: last Tuesday...but I digress. We'll be hosted at the hangar of Jeff Byard at Mountain Valley Airport (L94). Some of you old-timers may remember that Jeff is the president of the Vintage Sailplane Association and gave a very entertaining talk to our Chapter a few years back on the development of early gliders. Jeff has an impressive collection of rare, historically significant, and beautifully restored gliders and sailplanes in his hangar. Most of these machines are flyable! But wait, there's more! (oh, krap...how did an infomercial get into my newsletter? Hmmm....) Jeff has a BBQ grill (perhaps the match of the Chapter Grill?) and will have it fired up for the event. The chapter will be providing meat to grill, snacks, C^3, and beverages for a nominal donation. Grill-space will be made available to those wishing to grill their own meat (don't go there).
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Diversification Plan East Kern County, Ca Kern County
    FEBRUARY 2017 ECONOMIC DIVERSIFICATION PLAN EAST KERN COUNTY, CA KERN COUNTY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TIP Strategies would like to thank the many individuals who participated in the creation of this Economic Diversification Plan. We are especially grateful to the members of the East Kern Economic Alliance who contributed their time and input throughout this planning process. Their expertise helped us gain a deep understanding of the region’s range of assets and opportunities. We are also thankful for the US Department of Defense Office of Economic Adjustment for their visionary investments and support which helped make this project a reality. We also want to thank the leadership and staff of Kern County and the Kern EDC for their essential support, guidance, and feedback during the development of this plan. EAST KERN ECONOMIC ALLIANCE KEY STAKEHOLDERS Richard Chapman, President & CEO Jennifer Wood, Mayor Gary Parsons, Economic Kern Economic Development California City Development Manager Corporation City of Ridgecrest Karina Drees, CEO and General Bill Deaver, Michelle Vance, Economic Manager Edwards Community Alliance Development Coordinator Mojave Air & Spaceport City of Tehachapi Kimberly Maevers, President Kelly Bearden, Director Ryan Rush, Field Representative Greater Antelope Valley Economic CSU-Bakersfield SBDC Kern County Board of Supervisors, Alliance 2nd District KERN COUNTY PROJECT TEAM Supervisor Zach Scrivner, Chairman of the Kern County Board of Supervisors & 2nd District Supervisor Teresa Hitchcock, Assistant County Administrative
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Economic Assessment and SWOT Analysis for Tehachapi
    FEBRUARY 2017 ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT & SWOT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEHACHAPI, CA DRAFT CITY OF TEHACHAPI, CA DRAFT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TIP Strategies would like to thank the many individuals who participated in the creation of this Economic Assessment & SWOT Analysis. We are especially grateful to the community and business leaders in Tehachapi who contributed their time and input throughout this planning process. Their expertise helped us gain a deep understanding of the community’s numerous assets and opportunities. We are also thankful for the US Department of Defense Office of Economic Adjustment for their visionary investments and support which helped make this project a reality. We also want to thank the leadership and staff of Kern County and the Kern EDC for their essential support, guidance, and feedback during the development of this plan. TEHACHAPI KEY STAKEHOLDERS This is an incomplete list and will need to be completed before the document is finalized and released. Ed Grimes, Mayor Greg Garrett, City Manager Michelle Vance, Economic City of Tehachapi City of Tehachapi Development Coordinator City of Tehachapi Nikki Cummings, President Michael Nixon, President Need contact person World Wind and Solar Vintage V12s SunSelect California Name, Title Name, Title Name, Title Organization Organization Organization KERN COUNTY PROJECT TEAM Supervisor Zach Scrivner, Chairman of the Kern County Board of Supervisors & 2nd District Supervisor Teresa Hitchcock, Assistant County Administrative Officer for Policy & Economic Development Thomas Brown,
    [Show full text]
  • The Greater Antelope Valley Is Ready for Growth!
    The Greater Antelope Valley is Ready For Growth! It has been a pleasure to have the opportunity to serve as Chairman of the GAVEA and AVEREF Boards of Directors this past year. 2017 saw a purposeful effort to both create new, and strengthen current, partnerships with regional workforce development practitioners, educators, Team California, the Industrial Asset Management Council (IAMC), CalEd, GoBis, the local Boards of Trade, Chambers of Commerce and Realtors. These partnerships will serve as the cornerstone of economic growth as we move into 2018. For nearly 20 years, GAVEA’s Economic Round Table Report has been the singular source for current data relevant to business in our region. This year the GAVEA staff has raised the bar to bring you the best Round Table Report to date. We are confident you will be able to use this report to grow your own business, as well as aide in the recruitment of new businesses to the region. The GAVEA board would like to thank our Investors and sponsors for their continued support. Your investment in this organization supports all of the work we do together to build a greater Antelope Valley. The board would also like to recognize the work of the GAVEA staff. The effort you put in to improve the economy of the Antelope Valley is second to none. We look forward to another great and prosperous year, Dr. Steve Radford, GAVEA Chairman Board Members OFFICERS Dr. Steve Radford Chairman Harvey Holloway Director at Large Antelope Valley Union High School District Coldwell Banker Commercial Valley Realty Rob Duchow Vice Chair George Atkinson Director at Large The Gas Company Atkinson and Associates Laurel Shockley Secretary Veronica Knudson Director at Large Southern California Edison Palmdale Regional Medical Center DIRECTORS Martha Molina-Aviles Ed Knudson LA County Workforce Development Board Antelope Valley College Tom Barnes Bernie Longjohn Antelope Valley East Kern Water Agency Learn 4 Life Chenin Dow Chris L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leading Edge
    THE LEADING EDGE NEWSLETTER OF MUROC EAA CHAPTER 1000 Voted to Top Ten Newsletters, 1997, 1998 McKillop Award Competition President Gary Aldrich 661-609-0942 Vice-President George Gennuso 661-265-0333 Secretary Kent Troxel 661-947-2647 Treasurer Doug Dodson 661-256-7276 Newsletter Editor Russ Erb 661-256-3806 http://www.eaa1000.av.org August 2003 Chapter 1000 meets monthly on the third Tuesday of the month in the USAF Test Pilot School Scobee Auditorium, Edwards AFB, CA at 1700 or 5:00 PM, whichever you prefer. Any changes of meeting venue will be announced in the newsletter. Offer void where prohibited. Your mileage may vary. Open to military and civilian alike. This Month’s Meeting: your request and separate the traffic. There will be a question and answer session at the meeting, actually it may only be a question and answer session--we really don’t know.... So, wind up your beanies and get that propeller spinning and join us for an interesting evening. As always, there will be chips, salsa, chocolate chip cookies and beverages for your snaking enjoyment with the usual solutions to the world’s problems at the BK Lounge afterwards. - George “Knife” Gennuso Vice Kommandant Last Month's Meeting EAA Chapter 1000 Jeff Byard’s Hangar Mountain Valley Airport, Tehachapi CA 22 July 2003 Gary Aldrich, Presiding In a radical and unprecedented departure from our published calendar schedule, the July meeting was held on the FOURTH Tuesday of the month. In furtherance, the meeting was started two hours later than normal, and held in Tehachapi no less.
    [Show full text]