DOCSLIB.ORG

Lanius Senator (Woodchat Shrike)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lanius Senator (Woodchat Shrike) Lanius senator (Woodchat Shrike) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material The European Union (EU27) Red List assessments were based principally on the official data reported by EU Member States to the European Commission under Article 12 of the Birds Directive in 2013-14. For the European Red List assessments, similar data were sourced from BirdLife Partners and other collaborating experts in other European countries and territories. For more information, see BirdLife International (2015). Contents Reported national population sizes and trends p. 2 Trend maps of reported national population data p. 4 Sources of reported national population data p. 6 Species factsheet bibliography p. 9 Recommended citation BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Further information http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/euroredlist http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/european-red-list-birds-0 http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/ Data requests and feedback To request access to these data in electronic format, provide new information, correct any errors or provide feedback, please email [email protected]. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Lanius senator (Woodchat Shrike) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (pairs)3 Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Albania 2,000-5,000 <1 2002-2012 poor 0 0 2002-2012 poor 0 0 1980-2012 poor Andorra 0-2 <1 1997-1998 good ? ? Armenia 2,000-5,000 <1 2002-2012 medium ? ? Azerbaijan 5,000-20,000 1 1996-2000 poor ? ? Bosnia & HG 100-300 <1 2010-2014 poor ? ? Bulgaria 12,000-20,000 1 2005-2012 medium + 2-10 2001-2012 poor + 5-25 1980-2012 poor Croatia 10,000-20,000 1 2014 poor ? ? Cyprus 25-50 <1 2001-2012 medium 0 0 2001-2012 poor + 2000-2500 1980-2012 medium Czech Rep. 0 <1 2001-2003 good ? ? France 2,000-4,000 <1 2008-2012 medium - 0-5 2000-2012 poor - 20-50 1980-2012 medium Georgia Present <1 ? ? Germany 1-4 <1 2005-2009 good - 52-97 1998-2009 good - 51-100 1985-2009 medium Greece 60,000-70,000 3 2007-2013 medium 0 0 2007-2013 medium ? Italy 4,000 <1 2005-2010 poor - 70-80 2000-2012 medium - 75-85 1990-2012 poor Kosovo 30-50 <1 2009-2014 good ? ? FYRO Macedonia 5,000-15,000 <1 2001-2012 poor ? ? Montenegro 80-150 <1 2002-2012 poor ? ? Poland 0 <1 2008-2012 medium ? - 100 1980-2001 medium Portugal 10,000-50,000 1 2008-2012 medium - 29-47 2004-2011 medium ? Romania 100-400 <1 2001-2013 medium ? ? Russia 200-500 <1 2008-2012 medium + 5-30 2000-2012 good + 5-30 1980-2012 medium Serbia 280-390 <1 2008-2012 medium 0 0 2000-2012 medium 0 0 1980-2012 medium Slovakia 0 <1 2012 ? - 100 1983-1987 poor Slovenia 0-2 <1 2002-2012 poor ? ? Spain 1,790,000-2,810,000 90 2004-2006 good - 14 1998-2012 medium - 1980-2012 good Switzerland 0-1 <1 2008-2012 good - 90-95 2001-2012 medium - 92-100 1990-2012 medium Turkey 30,000-90,000 3 2013 poor - 0-19 2000-2012 medium - 0-19 1990-2013 poor EU27 1,880,000-2,960,000 96 Decreasing Europe 1,930,000-3,110,000 100 Decreasing THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Lanius senator (Woodchat Shrike) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (pairs)3 Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality 1 See 'Sources' at end of factsheet, and for more details on individual EU Member State reports, see the Article 12 reporting portal at http://bd.eionet.europa.eu/article12/report. 2 The designation of geographical entities and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 3 In the few cases where population size estimates were reported in units other than those specified, they were converted to the correct units using standard correction factors. 4 The robustness of regional trends to the effects of any missing or incomplete data was tested using plausible scenarios, based on other sources of information, including any other reported information, recent national Red Lists, scientific literature, other publications and consultation with relevant experts. 5 Trend directions are reported as: increasing (+); decreasing (-); stable (0); fluctuating (F); or unknown (?). 6 Trend magnitudes are rounded to the nearest integer. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Trend maps A symbol appears in each country where the species occurs: the shape and colour of the symbol represent the population trend in that country, and the size of the symbol corresponds to the proportion of the European population occurring in that country. KEY Ç Large increase (≥50%) È Large decrease (≥50%) Ç Moderate increase (20–49%) È Moderate decrease (20–49%) Ç Small increase (<20%) È Small decrease (<20%) ñ Increase of unknown magnitude ò Decrease of unknown magnitude å Stable or fluctuating 0 Unknown ¢ Present (no population or trend data) Ð Extinct since 1980 Each symbol, with the exception of Present and Extinct, may occur in up to three different size classes, corresponding to the proportion of the European population occurring in that country. ñ Large: ≥10% of the European population ñ Medium: 1–9% of the European population ñ Small: <1% of the European population The designation of geographical entities and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Figure 1. Breeding population sizes and short-term trends across Europe. Figure 2. Breeding population sizes and long-term trends across Europe. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Lanius senator (Woodchat Shrike) Sources Albania Breeding population size: Bino pers. obs. Breeding short-term trend: Bino pers. obs. Breeding long-term trend: Bino pers. obs. Andorra Breeding population size: BirdLife International 2004 Armenia Breeding population size: ASPB data Azerbaijan Breeding population size: BirdLife International 2004 Bosnia and Herzegovina Breeding population size: Kotrošan, D., Drocić, N., Trbojević, S., Šimić, E., Dervović, I., 2012: Program IBA, Međunarosdno značajna područja za ptice, u Bosni i Hercegovini. Ornitološko društvo “Naše ptice”, interno izdanje za projekat “Evaluacija IBA područja u FBiH”, Sarajevo., , Kotrošan, D. & Hatibović, E., 2012: Raptors in Bosnia and Herzegovina – status and perspectives for monitoring. Acrocephalus 33 (154/155): 173-179. Bulgaria Breeding population size: IVANOV, B. 2011. The Fauna of Bulgaria. Vol. 30. AVES. Part III. Marin Drinov PH. Sofia. 412 pp. IANKOV, P. (ed.) 2007. Atlas of Breeding Birds in Bulgaria. BSPB Conservation Series, Book 10. Sofia. 679 pp. NIKOLOV, B. 2006. The Shrikes (family Laniidae) (Aves: Passeriformes) in Bulgaria – distribution, breeding biology and migration. Institute of Zoology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Sofia. 422 pp. +XLII NANKINOV, D., А. DUTSOV, B. NIKOLOV, B. BORISSOV, G. STOYANOV, G. GRADEV, D. GEORGIEV, D. POPOV, D. DOMUSCHIEV, D. KIROV, E. TILOVA, I. NIKOLOV, I. IVANOV, K. DICHEV, K. POPOV, N. KARAIVANOV, N. TODOROV, P. SHURULINKOV, R. STANCHEV, R. ALEKSOV, R.TSONEV, S. DALAKTCHIEVA, S. IVANOV, S. MARIN, S. STAJKOV, S. NIKOLOV & H. NIKOLOV. 2004. Breeding totals of the ornithofauna in Bulgaria, 2004. Green Balkans, Plovdiv. 32 pp. Breeding short-term trend: IVANOV, B. 2011. The Fauna of Bulgaria. Vol. 30. AVES. Part III. Marin Drinov PH. Sofia. 412 pp. IANKOV, P. (ed.) 2007. Atlas of Breeding Birds in Bulgaria. BSPB Conservation Series, Book 10. Sofia. 679 pp. NIKOLOV, B. 2006. The Shrikes (family Laniidae) (Aves: Passeriformes) in Bulgaria – distribution, breeding biology and migration. Institute of Zoology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Sofia. 422 pp. +XLII NANKINOV, D., А. DUTSOV, B. NIKOLOV, B. BORISSOV, G. STOYANOV, G. GRADEV, D. GEORGIEV, D. POPOV, D. DOMUSCHIEV, D. KIROV, E. TILOVA, I. NIKOLOV, I. IVANOV, K. DICHEV, K. POPOV, N. KARAIVANOV, N. TODOROV, P. SHURULINKOV, R. STANCHEV, R. ALEKSOV, R.TSONEV, S. DALAKTCHIEVA, S. IVANOV, S. MARIN, S. STAJKOV, S. NIKOLOV & H. NIKOLOV. 2004. Breeding totals of the ornithofauna in Bulgaria, 2004. Green Balkans, Plovdiv. 32 pp. Common Birds Monitoring performed by BSPB shows moderate decline based on 2005-2012 data from 29 plots. Breeding long-term trend: IVANOV, B. 2011. The Fauna of Bulgaria. Vol. 30. AVES. Part III. Marin Drinov PH. Sofia. 412 pp. IANKOV, P. (ed.) 2007. Atlas of Breeding Birds in Bulgaria. BSPB Conservation Series, Book 10. Sofia. 679 pp. NIKOLOV, B. 2006. The Shrikes (family Laniidae) (Aves: Passeriformes) in Bulgaria – distribution, breeding biology and migration. Institute of Zoology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Sofia. 422 pp. +XLII NANKINOV, D., А. DUTSOV, B. NIKOLOV, B. BORISSOV, G. STOYANOV, G. GRADEV, D. GEORGIEV, D. POPOV, D. DOMUSCHIEV, D. KIROV, E. TILOVA, I.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bird Checklists of the World Country Or Region: Ghana
    Avibase Page 1of 24 Col Location Date Start time Duration Distance Avibase - Bird Checklists of the World 1 Country or region: Ghana 2 Number of species: 773 3 Number of endemics: 0 4 Number of breeding endemics: 0 5 Number of globally threatened species: 26 6 Number of extinct species: 0 7 Number of introduced species: 1 8 Date last reviewed: 2019-11-10 9 10 Recommended citation: Lepage, D. 2021. Checklist of the birds of Ghana. Avibase, the world bird database. Retrieved from .https://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/checklist.jsp?lang=EN&region=gh [26/09/2021]. Make your observations count! Submit your data to ebird.
    [Show full text]
  • FIRST OCCURRENCE of the MASKED SHRIKE LANIUS NUBICUS in the MALTESE ISLANDS Song
    IL-MERILL No. 25 1988 IL-MERILL No. 25 1988 band, giving the impression of a black patch behin.d the eye. lhe crown was greyish UNUSUAL MOULT IN A WOOD WARBLER PHYLLOSCOPUS SIB/LATRIX n turning blackish Towards the back of the head on both sides of the middle stripe. sides of the head were faintLy washed greyish green below the eye. lhe upperparts An aduLt Y~ood Warbler Phylloscopus sibilatrix caught for r 1ng 1ng at Xemx i on were :sh gree~ with a conspicuous pale yellow rump, in a rectangular form from one 14 September 1988 was found to have undergone a partial post-nuptiaL moult in side other. European breeding ground. lhe bird had moulted the following remiges: pp 3-4 and ss 6-8 as well as some greater coverts~ All other tracts showed no sign of mouLt and as such lhe greater and median coverts were boldly and widely edged pale yelLow forming showed a contrast between old feathers and the brighter green of the new feathers, two wi bars, with the upper smaller than the lower one. lhe 2nd and 3rd i"ert1als were also pale yellow, whiLe the rest of the wing flight feathers were edged greyish 'lhe bird also had an unusually short second primary which fell between pp 5-6. lhis green, and when closed getting the same appearance as the upper parts. lhe tall was could have been due to the fact that pp 3-4 were new while 2s5 and 6 were noi, and as greyish green with the lower parts of the outer webs greenish.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Global Decline in the True Shrikes (Family Laniidae)
    228 ShortCommunications and Commentaries [Auk, Vol. 111 The Auk 111(1):228-233, 1994 CONSERVATION COMMENTARY Evaluation of the Global Decline in the True Shrikes (Family Laniidae) REUVEN YOSEF t ArchboldBiological Station, P.O. Box2057, Lake Placid, Florida 33852, USA The first International Shrike Symposiumwas held Shrike was found in 1975, and of the Northern Shrike at the Archbold Biological Station, Lake Placid, Flor- in 1982. In Switzerland, these two specieshave offi- ida, from 11-15 January 1993. The symposium was cially been declared extinct. attended by 71 participants from 23 countries(45% In Sweden, Olsson (1993) and Carlson (1993) have North America, 32%Europe, 21% Asia, and 2% Africa). attributed the decline (over 50% between 1970 and The most exciting participation was that of a strong 1990) of the Red-backed Shrike to the destruction and contingent of ornithologists from eastern Europe. In deterioration of suitable habitats. Olsson (1993) ob- this commentary I present the points stressedat the served a large reduction of pastures in the last two Symposiumand illustrate them with severalexamples decades,and considers the Swedish law requiring as presentedby the authors. planting of unused pastures and fallow lands with The Symposiumwas convened to focus attention conifers as unfavorable for shrikes. He also stated that on, evaluate, and possibly recommend methods to nitrogenousand acid-rainpollutants have influenced reverse the worldwide decline of shrike populations. vegetationcomposition and insectpopulations, both Many of the 30 speciesare declining, or have become of which in turn have affected shrikes negatively. In extinct locally. Studies have focused mainly on the the Swedish Bird Population Monitoring Program, five speciesfound closestto placeswhere ornithol- the numbers of Red-backed Shrikes declined from a ogists live: Northern/Great Grey Shrike (Laniusex- high index of 100 in 1975, to a low of 60 in 1981.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN BIRDS of CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities
    EUROPEAN BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, trends and national responsibilities COMPILED BY ANNA STANEVA AND IAN BURFIELD WITH SPONSORSHIP FROM CONTENTS Introduction 4 86 ITALY References 9 89 KOSOVO ALBANIA 10 92 LATVIA ANDORRA 14 95 LIECHTENSTEIN ARMENIA 16 97 LITHUANIA AUSTRIA 19 100 LUXEMBOURG AZERBAIJAN 22 102 MACEDONIA BELARUS 26 105 MALTA BELGIUM 29 107 MOLDOVA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 32 110 MONTENEGRO BULGARIA 35 113 NETHERLANDS CROATIA 39 116 NORWAY CYPRUS 42 119 POLAND CZECH REPUBLIC 45 122 PORTUGAL DENMARK 48 125 ROMANIA ESTONIA 51 128 RUSSIA BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is a partnership of 48 national conservation organisations and a leader in bird conservation. Our unique local to global FAROE ISLANDS DENMARK 54 132 SERBIA approach enables us to deliver high impact and long term conservation for the beneit of nature and people. BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is one of FINLAND 56 135 SLOVAKIA the six regional secretariats that compose BirdLife International. Based in Brus- sels, it supports the European and Central Asian Partnership and is present FRANCE 60 138 SLOVENIA in 47 countries including all EU Member States. With more than 4,100 staf in Europe, two million members and tens of thousands of skilled volunteers, GEORGIA 64 141 SPAIN BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, together with its national partners, owns or manages more than 6,000 nature sites totaling 320,000 hectares. GERMANY 67 145 SWEDEN GIBRALTAR UNITED KINGDOM 71 148 SWITZERLAND GREECE 72 151 TURKEY GREENLAND DENMARK 76 155 UKRAINE HUNGARY 78 159 UNITED KINGDOM ICELAND 81 162 European population sizes and trends STICHTING BIRDLIFE EUROPE GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Assessment for Georgia
    Biodiversity Assessment for Georgia Task Order under the Biodiversity & Sustainable Forestry IQC (BIOFOR) USAID C ONTRACT NUMBER: LAG-I-00-99-00014-00 SUBMITTED TO: USAID WASHINGTON E&E BUREAU, ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION SUBMITTED BY: CHEMONICS INTERNATIONAL INC. WASHINGTON, D.C. FEBRUARY 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I INTRODUCTION I-1 SECTION II STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY II-1 A. Overview II-1 B. Main Landscape Zones II-2 C. Species Diversity II-4 SECTION III STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION III-1 A. Protected Areas III-1 B. Conservation Outside Protected Areas III-2 SECTION IV STRATEGIC AND POLICY FRAMEWORK IV-1 A. Policy Framework IV-1 B. Legislative Framework IV-1 C. Institutional Framework IV-4 D. Internationally Supported Projects IV-7 SECTION V SUMMARY OF FINDINGS V-1 SECTION VI RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVED BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION VI-1 SECTION VII USAID/GEORGIA VII-1 A. Impact of the Program VII-1 B. Recommendations for USAID/Georgia VII-2 ANNEX A SECTIONS 117 AND 119 OF THE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT A-1 ANNEX B SCOPE OF WORK B-1 ANNEX C LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED C-1 ANNEX D LISTS OF RARE AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF GEORGIA D-1 ANNEX E MAP OF LANDSCAPE ZONES (BIOMES) OF GEORGIA E-1 ANNEX F MAP OF PROTECTED AREAS OF GEORGIA F-1 ANNEX G PROTECTED AREAS IN GEORGIA G-1 ANNEX H GEORGIA PROTECTED AREAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESIGN SUMMARY H-1 ANNEX I AGROBIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN GEORGIA (FROM GEF PDF GRANT PROPOSAL) I-1 SECTION I Introduction This biodiversity assessment for the Republic of Georgia has three interlinked objectives: · Summarizes the status of biodiversity and its conservation in Georgia; analyzes threats, identifies opportunities, and makes recommendations for the improved conservation of biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Pitfalls and Assessment Problems
    IDENTIFICATION PITFALLS AND ASSESSMENT PROBLEMS This series, which started in January 1983 (Brit. Birds 76: 26-28), is not intended to cover all facets of the identification of the species concerned, but only the major sources of error likely to mislead the observer in the field or the person attempting to assess the written evidence. The species covered are mostly those which were formerly judged by the Rarities Committee*, but which are now the responsibility of county and regional recorders and records committees; other species, both rarer and commoner than those, are also featured sometimes. 17. Woodchat Shrike Lanius senator The identification of an adult Woodchat Shrike should present very few problems, as there are almost no species with which it is likely to be confused (plate 70). Once the black mask on the forehead and face (on female, much reduced on forehead), the chestnut crown and nape, or the white rump in flight is seen, then the possibility of the bird being mistaken for a Masked Shrike L. nubicus is eliminated. The separation of juveniles and immatures, however, is considerably more problematic, as Woodchat, Red-backed L. collurio and Masked Shrikes are extremely similar in first-year plumage. When the BBRC decided to remove Woodchat Shrike from its list of species consid­ ered (with effect from January 1991), some reservations were expressed that the species was still a rarity in most of the UK and one with which there were possibilities for confusion with both commoner and much rarer species. After a prolonged discussion, the Committee concluded that, provided sufficiently good or detailed views are obtained and particular attention paid to the diagnostic areas of the plumage, then the possibilities of a misidentification are reduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Manipulation by Young Passerines and the Possible Evolutionary History of Impaling by Shrikes
    FOOD MANIPULATION BY YOUNG PASSERINES AND THE POSSIBLE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF IMPALING BY SHRIKES SUSAN M. SMITH HE ability of shrikes of the genus L&us to impale their prey is an T effective behavioral substitute for the talons they lack. The ontogeny of impaling behavior of various European shrikes in this genus has been described in detail by Lorenz and von Saint Paul (1968) ; and both Wemmer (1969) and Smith (1972) have described its development in the North American Loggerhead Shrike (L. Zudovicianus). In each species, the first motor pattern recognizable as being related to impaling consisted of taking an object in the bill, turning sideways, and placing it on the perch beside the bird. This was called “Tupfbewegungen” (spot-movements) by Lorenz and von Saint Paul (1968) and “dabbing” by Smith (1972). Both captive and wild young shrikes between three and four weeks old performed this behavior readily; typically after this age a pulling component appeared and the behavior was then called “dragging.” These motor patterns were ap- parently innate. The present study involves observations made during a comparative investigation of the ontogeny of feeding behavior of hand-reared Black-capped Chickadees (Parus atricapillus) ,Blue Jays (Cyunocittu cristutu), and Catbirds (Dumetellu curolinensis) . None of these three is predatory or impales food, but nevertheless certain aspects of their early behavior bear remarkable resemblance to that of young Loggerhead Shrikes. The data will be interpreted in terms of the light they may shed on the possible evolutionary history of impaling by shrikes. METHODS Four chickadees from one brood, four Catbirds from two broods, and five jays from two broods were hand-reared in the summer of 1971.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts Bird Numbers 2019 Counting Birds Counts
    Bird Numbers 2019 Counting birds counts Book of Abstracts © Joaquim Antunes st 21 Conference of the European Bird Census Council ISBN: 978-989-8550-85-9 This page was intentionally left in blank Imprint Editors João E. Rabaça, Carlos Godinho, Inês Roque LabOr-Laboratory of Ornithology, ICAAM, University of Évora Scientific Committee Aleksi Lehikoinen (chair), Ruud Foppen, Lluís Brotons, Mark Eaton, Henning Heldbjerg, João E. Rabaça, Carlos Godinho, Rui Lourenço, Oskars Keišs, Verena Keller Organising Committee João E. Rabaça, Carlos Godinho, Inês Roque, Rui Lourenço, Pedro Pereira, Ruud Foppen, Aleksi Lehikoinen Volunteer team André Oliveira, Cláudia Lopes, Inês Guise, Patrícia Santos, Pedro Freitas, Pedro Ribeiro, Rui Silva, Sara Ornelas, Shirley van der Horst Recommended citation Rabaça, J.E., Roque, I., Lourenço, R. & Godinho, C. (Eds.) 2019: Bird Numbers 2019: counting birds counts. Book of Abstracts of the 21st Conference of the European Bird Census Council. University of Évora, Évora. ISBN: 978-989-8550-85-9 Bird Numbers 2019: counting birds counts The logo of the Conference pictures two species with different stories: the Woodchat Shrike Lanius senator and the Dartford Warbler Sylvia undata, both occurring in Alentejo. The first is a LC species currently suffering a moderate decline in Spain and Portugal; the second is a resident bird classified as NT which is declining in Europe at a moderate rate and seemingly increasing in Portugal, a country that holds 25% of its European population. Bird Numbers 2019 Counting birds counts
    [Show full text]
  • Arabian Peninsula
    THE CONSERVATION STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE BREEDING BIRDS OF THE ARABIAN PENINSULA Compiled by Andy Symes, Joe Taylor, David Mallon, Richard Porter, Chenay Simms and Kevin Budd ARABIAN PENINSULA The IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM - Regional Assessment About IUCN IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges. IUCN’s work focuses on valuing and conserving nature, ensuring effective and equitable governance of its use, and deploying nature-based solutions to global challenges in climate, food and development. IUCN supports scientific research, manages field projects all over the world, and brings governments, NGOs, the UN and companies together to develop policy, laws and best practice. IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental organization, with almost 1,300 government and NGO Members and more than 15,000 volunteer experts in 185 countries. IUCN’s work is supported by almost 1,000 staff in 45 offices and hundreds of partners in public, NGO and private sectors around the world. www.iucn.org About the Species Survival Commission The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions with a global membership of around 7,500 experts. SSC advises IUCN and its members on the wide range of technical and scientific aspects of species conservation, and is dedicated to securing a future for biodiversity. SSC has significant input into the international agreements dealing with biodiversity conservation. About BirdLife International BirdLife International is the world’s largest nature conservation Partnership. BirdLife is widely recognised as the world leader in bird conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Carabinieri Agreement Danilo Mainardi Remembered
    Lega Italiana Protezione Uccelli ali Conservation News from Italy • Mother Earth • Woodchat Shrike in danger • LIPU – Carabinieri agreement • Danilo Mainardi remembered SummerAli Summer 2017 17 Page 1 Danilo Mainardi, Honorary President of LIPU, at the LIPU Assemblea at Montepulciano in 2008, speaking to the delegates after dinner and, typically, making a point with expertly drawn illustrations. See a tribute on page 24. Ali Summer 17 Page 2 Dear Members ... n this edition of Ali, among many items of interest Editorial Iwe present data from Birds in Europe 3, the latest study from BirdLife International on the conserva- Fulvio Mamone tion status of European birds. The presentation of Capria – LIPU the report, which came in advance of its European President launch in the setting of the splendid General As- sembly of LIPU members at Parma on May 20, offered us a chiaroscuro canvas: on one hand, there was an improvement in the situation for a number of species, thanks partly to our exhaustive work for their protection; on the other, there was the in- creased number of globally threatened species (the so-called SPEC 1 category) from 40 to 68 in only ten years. A worrying statistic that applies not least to Italy, especially given that in our country five of these species (Rock Partridge, Lapwing, Redwing, Pochard and Turtle Dove) may still be hunted. It was for this reason that LIPU immediately requested that the Government and the Regions halt the hunting of these species and put more effort into enforcing the directives, giving greater protection to the continent’s biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Data Book of European Vertebrates : a Contribution to Action Theme N° 11 of the Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy, Final Draft
    Strasbourg, 5 July 2001 T-PVS (2001) 31 [Bern\T-PVS 2001\tpvs31e_2001] English only CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee Preliminary European Red List of Vertebrates Draft for comments - Volume 1 - Joint project between the Council of Europe and the European Environment Agency, based on WCMC draft from 1998. Co-ordinated by the European Topic Centre/Nature Conservation – Paris This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS (2001) 31 - II - Comments should be sent to: European Topic Centre for Nature Protection and Biodiversity MNHN 57 rue Cuvier 75231 PARIS Cedex, France [email protected] - III - T-PVS (2001) 31 About this draft Red List This document is the result of a joint project between the European Environment Agency and the Council of Europe to develop a preliminary European Red List of Vertebrates. It is based on a first draft by WCMC in 1998. Except for Birds (Birdlife International, 1994), no assessment is yet available on the conservation status of Vertebrate species at European level, while Red Books exist at national level in almost all European countries. On the other hand, a global list of threatened species is published and maintained up-dated by IUCN according to well defined criteria (IUCN, 2000). The present assessment is a first attempt to identify the most threatened Vertebrates species at European level, building upon a first analysis of the list of globally threatened species present in Europe (WCMC, 1998) and taking into account the most recent available overviews on European species distribution provided by the various European atlas committees (European Bird Census Council; Societas Europaea Herpetologica, Societas Europea Mammalogica).
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGIA Pearl of the Caucasus M
    TheGEORGIA pearl of the Caucasus M. Biasioli Georgia is situated at an intersection between different biogeographical regions, and this is reflected in the richness of its nature and wildlife: there is a high number of endemic or localized species, and a wonderful mix of northern, eastern and mediterranean elements. Asia and Europe come in contact here, and the varied and rugged environment guarantees a wide selection of habitats in which to look for birds. Large parts of Georgia are still M. Biasioli very wild and with low human density, and not only in the mountain areas: the open, arid areas present in the south east for instance have little human population, and host a great set of very interesting bird species, as well as a lot of localized reptile and amphibian species. Also the cultivated areas offer M. Mendi good opportunity for birdwatching, while the vast expanses of both broadleaved and coniferous forests offer refuge for large mammals such as Brown bear, Wolf and Lynx. The greater Caucasus mountain range lies in the north of the country, and its highest peak here reaches over 5000 metres! Batumi, on the Black Sea coast, is now famous as one of the best hot spot on earth for observing raptor migration, especially in the autumn passage, M. Biasioli GEORGIA with incredible numbers and a large variety of species. Georgia is a fantastic country for nature lovers, and a trip here is sure to satisfy even the most Birdwatching & Photography demanding birdwatcher. The mountain areas in and around Kazbegi are rightly famous for being SKUA Nature promotes and develops nature tourism in the best place where to see fantastic species such as Caucasian Snowcock, Armenia in collaboration with Eco tours Georgia.
    [Show full text]