DOCSLIB.ORG

ALTERNATIVE RENEWABLE ENERGY Interactive Qualifying

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

September 10, 2010 ALTERNATIVE RENEWABLE ENERGY Interactive Qualifying Project Report completed in partial fulfillment of the Bachelor of Science degree at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA Submitted to: Professor Mayer Humi Produced By: Dave Dwyer Jose Grasso John Kent Christopher Stanton Carlos Urdaneta ABSTRACT Scientists, environmentalists and engineers are generating solutions to create a sustainable energy infrastructure in order to maintain all technological advances and protect the environment. With this project, the group researched the advantages and disadvantages of various fuels. Issues include these energy sources’ impact on the environment and health, safety, as well as current and future energy legislations. As a result of this research, the group has compared all forms of energy by creating a ranking system, and will reveal which are the most practical and sustainable forms of energy. 1 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary……………………..………………………………6 Introduction……………………………..……………………………….8 National Energy Policy……………………………..………………...…9 Chapter 1…………………………………………………………………………………..9 Chapter 2…………………………………………………………………………………..9 Chapter 3………………………………………………………..………………………..10 Chapter 4…………………………………………………………..……………………..10 Chapter 5……………………………………………………………..…………..………11 Chapter 6……………………………………………………………..………..…………12 Chapter 7……………………………………………………………...…………………12 Chapter 8…………………………………………………………………………………14 Natural Gas………………………………………………………….....16 Role…………………………………………………………………………...……….…16 Consumption…..…………………………………………………….……..………….…16 Production……..……………………………………………………………..….…….…16 Reserves…………….…………………………………………………………...…….…17 Imports………...………………………………………………….…………………...…17 Unconventional Natural Gas…………………………………………………………….18 Shale Gas…………….………………………………………………….…….…18 Coalbed Methane...…………..………………………………………….…….…19 Tight Gas Sands………………………….………………………………….…...20 Methane Hydrates...………………………………..………………………….…20 Prices..…...…………………………………………………………………………….…21 Environmental Impacts………………………………………………………..…...….…22 Works Cited…………………………………………………………………..……….…23 Wind Energy…………………………………………………………...24 Production Process………...……………………………………………………….….…24 2 | P a g e Modern Turbines……………..……………………………………………………….…25 Improvements………………..………………………………………………………..…26 Turbine Dynamics………………………...…………………………………………......27 Micrositing and Array Effects……………………...……………………………………28 Mesoscale Process………………………………..…………………………………...…28 Climate Effects………………………………………...…………………………………28 Organizational and Process Improvements……………….………………………..….…29 Transmission Systems……………………………….…………………….….…29 Small Winds……………………………………………………………….….…30 Other Benefits…………………………………..………………………….….…30 Decrease in CO2 Emissions……………………………………………………………...31 Decrease in Water Usage………………………………………………………………...32 Total Cost of Wind………………………………………..…………………….………..33 Land Requirements………………………………………………………………………34 Wind Energy Complaints………………………………………………………………...34 Future of Wind……………………………………………..………………………….…34 Recommendations……………………..…………………..……………………………..35 Windmill Model……………………………………………………………………….…36 Works Cited…………………………………………………..……………………….…37 Nuclear Energy………………………………………………………...38 Energy Process…………………………………………………..…………………….…38 Nuclear Developments…………………………………………..…………………….…39 Thorium as Fuel………………………………………………..…………………..….…40 Uranium..…………………………………………………………………………..….…42 Safety .………………………………………………………….………………….….…43 Disposal of Nuclear Waste……………………………….……….……………….….….45 Total Cost……………………………………………….…….……………………….…48 Potential of Nuclear Power…………………………………..………………………..…49 Obama’s Plan…………………………………………………………………………….50 Recommendations…………………………………………..……………………….…...51 Works Cited..…………………………………………………..……………………...…52 3 | P a g e Cancer and Nuclear Power……………………….……...……….….…53 Childhood Cancer………………………………………………………………………..53 Tritium..…………………………………………………..………………………..….…53 Thyroid Cancer…………………………………………...………………………..….…54 Work Cited……………………………………………………………………………….56 Cancer and Energy……………………………………………………..57 Coal…………………………………………………………………….60 Types of Coal……………………...………………………….……………………….…60 Coal Extraction…………………………………………………………..…….……...…61 Coal Process………………………………………………………………….....….….…61 Coal Transportation..………………………………………………………………….…62 Coal Locations…………………………………………………………………….….…62 Use of Coal………………………………………………………………………...….…65 Environmental Effects………………………………………………………….….….…65 Clean Coal Technologies….……………………………………………………….….…68 Conclusions………………………………………………………………………...….…70 Solutions.………………………………………………………………………….…..…71 Graphs…..……………………………………………………………………………..…72 Works Cited………………………………………………………………………..….…73 Oil……………………………………………………………………...74 Chemistry of Petroleum…………………………………………………………..…...…76 Manufacturing Process……………………………………………………..….……...…76 Oil Classifications………………………………………………………………..…...…80 Unconventional Oil…………………………………………………..……………….…80 Consumption…………………………………………………………..……………...…82 Production……………………………………………………………………..……..….82 Major Domestic Reserves..…………………………………………………………...…83 Peak Oil…………………………………………………………………..………..….…88 Imports…………………………………………………………………….………….…90 Environmental Impacts…...…………………………………………………….….….…90 4 | P a g e Waste Water……………………………………………………………………….…..…93 Obama’s Oil Policy………………………………..….……………………………...….98 Works Cited………………………………………..……………………………….....…99 BP Oil Spill………………………………………………..……………………….…...100 Hydraulic Fracturing……………………………………………….…108 Linear Gel.………..……………………………………………………………….……109 Cross-Linked Gels……...………………………………………………………………109 Foamed Gels…...…………………………………………………………………….…111 Slick Water..………………………………………………………………………….…112 Chemical Additives…………………………………………………………………..…113 Tests and Mechanics……………………………………………………………………115 Environmental Effects…...…………………………………………………………..…118 Works Cited………………………………………..………………………………..…120 Solar Energy…………………………………………………………..121 Impact of Solar Energy…...…………………………...………………………….….…123 Where to Develop Solar Technology……………………………………………..….…124 Passive Solar Technology..……………………..…….…………………………..….…125 Electric Solar Energy…...………………………………...…………………….………126 Solar Energy in the Present..………………………………..……………………….…127 New Technologies………………………………………………………………..….…132 Cost of Solar Energy…………………………………………..………….………….…133 Environmental Impact…………………………………………………….………….…135 Solar Energy in Space...……………………………………………….….………….…135 Obama’s Solar Energy Initiative…………………………………….……………….…136 Works Cited………………………………….…………………….……………..….…137 Energy Optimization Model…………………………………..……...138 Energy Resource Rating……………………………………………...140 Conclusion……………………………………………………………141 5 | P a g e EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Energy is a critical issue because nonrenewable energy sources will soon disappear, as a result of society’s rising dependence on them. The group analyzed different issues connected with six types of energy: petroleum, natural gas, coal, solar energy, wind energy, and nuclear energy. Petroleum is considered one of the main energy sources in the world. It is the basic substance that powers society’s transportation and heating systems. It is also used in the production of many chemicals and pharmaceutical products. The group analyzed petroleum’s availability, reserves, extraction costs, supply and demand, effects on health and the environment, as well as finds solutions to all these problems. Solar energy is a relatively new technology compared to other energy sources. The group investigated numerous solutions that decreased the use of coal and other nonrenewable energy sources. The group also discussed solar energy production prices and alternatives for making these prices more reasonable. Furthermore, the group reviewed more efficient methods such as developing solar energy in space. Nuclear- After President Obama granted billions of dollars towards expanding nuclear energy, we examined how this could change the distribution of nuclear energy in the United States. Before this is examined in depth the energy process of coal, as well as technological advancements and safety and waste disposal are covered. Costs are also compared along with other factors that prove nuclear energy is very profitable and will play a big role in the United States energy distribution. Wind- Wind Energy was examined after the department of energy provided detailed statements and recommendations to expand wind energy production to 20% of the total U.S. energy production by 2030. We reviewed these and summarized the recommendations, examined the turbine process by which it produces energy, and discussed its benefits and maximum possible potential. Coal is one of the cheapest and oldest sources of energy in the world, but it is also one of the largest pollutants. The United States has 28% of the world’s coal reserves. It is the country with the most known reserves in the world, and more than 50% of the energy produced in the United States comes from coal. The group discusses all types of coal, its environmental effects and the coal process in order to find solutions to decrease the emissions of greenhouse gases that are affecting the environment. The group also analyzes new clean coal technologies in order to optimize the process and reduce its environmental effects. 6 | P a g e Natural gas is the most environmentally friendly fossil fuel. It has half the CO2 emissions of coal and a third of oil. Natural gas has had an increasing role in electrical generation currently contributing to 23 percent. Natural gas is an important feedstock in plastics, fertilizers, and pharmaceuticals. Gas is also used in space heating and cooking. The United States
Recommended publications
  • Plan Coordinator, FO, Plans Section (MS 5231)

    Plan Coordinator, FO, Plans Section (MS 5231)

    UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT August 5, 2019 MEMORANDUM To: Public Information (MS 5030) From: Plan Coordinator, FO, Plans Section (MS 5231) Subj ect: Public Information copy of plan Control # S-07968 Type Supplemental Exploration Plan Lease(s) OCS-G36134 Elock - 629 Mississippi Canyon Area Operator LLOG Exploration Offshore, L.L.C. Description Subsea Well C and C-ALT Rig Type Not Found Attached is a copy of the subject plan. It has been deemed submitted as of this date and is under review for approval Leslie Wilson Plan Coordinator Site Type/Name Botm Lse/Area/Blk Surface Location Surf Lse/Area/Blk WELL/C G36134/MC/629 6100 FNL, 5062 FEL G36134/MC/629 WELL/C-ALT G36134/MC/629 6100 FNL, 5112 FEL G36134/MC/629 LLOG EXPLORATION OFFSHORE, L.L.C. 1001 Ochsner Boulevard, Suite 100 Covington, Louisiana 70433 SUPPLEMENTAL EXPLORATION PLAN OCS-G 36134 LEASE MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLOCK 629 Prepared By: Sue Sachitana Regulatory Specialist LLOG Exploration Offshore, L.L.C. 985-801-4300-Office 985-801-4716-Direct [email protected] Date: July 10, 2019 LLOG EXPLORATION OFFSHORE, L.L.C. SUPPLEMENTAL EXPLORATION PLAN OCS-G 36134 MISSISSIPPI CANYON BLOCK 629 APPENDIX A Plan Contents APPENDIX B General Information APPENDIX C Geological, Geophysical Information APPENDIX D H2S Information APPENDIX E Biological, Physical and Socioeconomic Information APPENDIX F Waste and Discharge Information APPENDIX G Air Emissions Information APPENDIX H Oil Spill Information APPENDIX I Environmental Monitoring Information APPENDIX J Lease Stipulation Information APPENDIX K Environmental Mitigation Measures Information APPENDIX L Related Facilities and Operations Information APPENDIX M Support Vessels and Aircraft Information APPENDIX N Onshore Support Facilities Information APPENDIX O Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) Information APPENDIX P Environmental Impact Analysis APPENDIX Q Administrative Information Mississippi Canyon Block 629, OCS-G-36134 Supplemental Exploration Plan APPENDIX A PLAN CONTENTS (30 CFR Part 550.211 and 550.241) A.
  • An Overview of Vortex-Induced Vibration and Its Suppression Devices

    An Overview of Vortex-Induced Vibration and Its Suppression Devices

    An Overview of Vortex-Induced Vibration and Its Suppression Devices Don Allen VIV Solutions LLC Houston, Texas, USA What is VIV? • VIV is a concern for marine riser systems and offshore structures • Caused when ocean currents flow past a blunt object • Shedding vortices impart forces onto the object • “Lock in” occurs when the frequency of eddy shedding current matches the natural frequency of the tubular • Can cause accelerated fatigue damage subsea tubular Video of Riser Clashing Caused by VIV Advantages of Tail Fairings™ • Capable of reducing VIV by a full order of magnitude, even when fairings are present only near the top of a riser string • Improve riser fatigue life • Reduce risk of experiencing higher harmonics • Limit wellhead fatigue • Reduce top and bottom angles • Lower drag (Cd ~0.6) • Allow for drilling operations to continue in high currents (less rig downtime) • Most common type of suppression device in use today for drilling risers VIV Solutions can assist with analysis efforts related to fairing coverage length, CONFIDENTIAL joint layout, etc. Project Experience Vessel Client Location Atwood Advantage Atwood Oceanics Gulf of Mexico Eirik Raude Ocean Rig South Africa Stena IceMAX Shell French Guiana Deepsea Metro 1 BG Group Tanzania Deepsea Stavanger Ophir Energy Tanzania Ocean Confidence* Diamond Offshore Brazil Ocean Courage Trinidad Ocean Endeavor* Gulf of Mexico Ocean Voyager* Ocean Star* Ocean Valiant* Ocean Whittington Ocean Worker* West Sirius* Seadrill Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Discovery* Devon Energy Gulf of Mexico Discoverer Clear Leader* Transocean Gulf of Mexico Discoverer Inspiration* Chikyu* Cosmos Shoji Japan Cajun Express* Chevron Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Nautilus* Shell Gulf of Mexico CONFIDENTIAL (*) Indicates project performed through Shell Global Solutions.
  • Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon”

    Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon”

    Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 21088 Filed 07/20/16 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: OIL SPILL BY THE OIL § MDL No. 2179 RIG “DEEPWATER HORIZON” § IN THE GULF OF MEXICO, § SECTION: J ON APRIL 20, 2010 § This document relates to all cases. § JUDGE BARBIER § MAG. JUDGE SHUSHAN ORDER [BP’s Motion for Order of Disposal of Material (Rec. doc. 19381)] CONSIDERING BP Exploration & Production Inc., BP America Production Company, and BP America Inc.’s (“BP”) motion for an order governing the disposal of source material and other substances, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. WHEREAS BP collected oil and other material from various containment and recovery vessels at the well site and from surface recovery efforts during the summer of 2010; 2. And whereas BP also collected volumes of surrogate oil for use in contexts where actual Macondo oil was not essential; 3. And whereas BP, since 2010, has advertised the availability of such materials, and has made, and continues to make, such recovered and collected material available to interested researchers; 4. And whereas BP has satisfied the demand for such materials and that demand has almost completely ended; 5. And whereas the volumes of oil and other materials currently held by BP far exceed the demand that reasonably might be expected in the future; Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 21088 Filed 07/20/16 Page 2 of 3 6. And whereas BP has moved this Court seeking to dispose properly of superfluous oil and other material, but to continue to maintain supplies that still exceed the likely future demand by researchers and scientists; 7.
  • Copernic Agent Search Results

    Copernic Agent Search Results

    Copernic Agent Search Results Search: Oil Spill Deep Ocean Danger (All the words) Found: 1503 result(s) on _Full.Search Date: 7/17/2010 6:33:28 AM 1. Gulf Oil Spill Environmental Damage Could Get Much Worse Jul 6, 2010 ... McKinney points out that this deep underwater region is largely ... zone in the Gulf and that pose a long-term threat to ocean life. ... Studies of the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska show that ... Be aware of toxic chemicals in house http://environment.about.com/b/2010/07/06/gulf-oil-spill-environmental- damage-could-get-much-worse.htm 99% 2. 6 lessons from the BP oil spill 2010/07/12 For years to come, the United States and the oil industry will be absorbing the lessons of the BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Regulators will toughen inspections. Oil companies will adopt ... http://www.wfmj.com/Global/story.asp?S=12792031 93% 3. 2 scientists tell presidential oil spill commission fear of dispersants is mostly unfounded 2010/07/13 An update from the second public hearing of the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling Commission. You can watch the hearing live. Eliot Kamenitz, The Times-PicayuneMathy Stanislaus of the Environmental Protection Agency, Charlie Henry of the http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil- spill/index.ssf/2010/07/scientists_tell_presidential_o.html 92% 4. Gulf of Mexico oil 2010/06/28 The oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is not yet an environmental catastrophe - but could worsen as the hurricane season gets under way, scientists said today.
  • The Information Redacted Contains Names F

    The Information Redacted Contains Names F

    15.d.5(CD) List of CAMS employees and 15.d.6(CD) List of CAP employees 01.24.14 (Note the list of employees required under 15.d.5 and 15.d.6 are identical and have been combined into one document) INFORMATION REDACTED IN THE FOLLOWING REPORT NON-CONFIDENTIAL SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The information redacted contains names for each employee holding a position identified in Sections 15.d.5 (““CAMS Employees”) and 15.d.6 (““CAP Employees”) of the Consent Decree as of the date of submission, January 2014. 15.d.5(CD) List of CAMS and 15.d.6(CD) List of CAP employees 01.24.14 (redacted) 15.d.5(CD) List of CAMS employees and 15.d.6(CD) List of CAP employees 01.24.14 (Note the list of employees required under 15.d.5 and 15.d.6 are identical and have been combined into one document) Last Name First Name Current Assignment Position Discoverer Enterprise Driller Discoverer Deep Seas Driller GSF Development Driller I Driller Discoverer India Dynamic Pos Oper II Deepwater Pathfinder Subsea Spvr GSF Development Driller I Dynamic Pos Oper II Discoverer Clear Leader Dynamic Pos Oper III GSF Development Driller II Driller Discoverer Clear Leader Driller Discoverer Spirit Subsea Spvr Discoverer Spirit Driller Discoverer Deep Seas Sr Subsea Spvr (MUX) NAM Development Driller III Driller Discoverer Inspiration Driller Discoverer Inspiration Dynamic Pos Oper II Discoverer India Dynamic Pos Oper II GSF C. R. Luigs Driller Development Driller III Sr Subsea Spvr (MUX) NAM Deepwater Pathfinder Subsea Spvr INFORMATION Discoverer Clear Leader Driller Discoverer
  • Marine Well Containment Company

    Marine Well Containment Company

    Marine Well Containment Company Dan Smallwood, Chief Operations Officer February 2, 2012 Agenda Company Overview Interim Containment System Expanded Containment System Deployment Example 2012 Priorities 2 MWCC – Confidential Agenda Company Overview Interim Containment System Expanded Containment System Deployment Example 2012 Priorities 3 MWCC – Confidential Our Commitment Continuously ready to respond to a well control incident in the deepwater U.S. Gulf of Mexico Continuously advancing deepwater well containment in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico Recognized and respected leader in deepwater well containment in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico 4 MWCC – Confidential About Our Company Leading deepwater well containment system and technology provider for U.S. Gulf of Mexico Expertise in subsea containment and incident response training Independent, not‐for‐profit company 10 members, representing 70% of the deepwater wells drilled from 2007‐2009 Each member has an equal share and an equal vote Investment of over $1 billion in system System available to all operators in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico as a member or as a non‐member (per well basis) 5 MWCC – Confidential Agenda Company Overview Interim Containment System Expanded Containment System Deployment Example 2012 Priorities 6 MWCC – Confidential MWCC Containment System Roles MWCC Covered Entity (Responsible Party - RP) Maintain containment system in ready Direct and manage containment state response (with Unified Command) Deliver capping stack and subsea Remove debris components
  • The Information Redacted Contains Names F

    The Information Redacted Contains Names F

    15.d.1(CD) List of Well Control Personnel and 15.d.3(CD) Designated Employees 01.24.14 (Note the list of employees required under 15.d.1 and 15.d.3 Are identical and have been combined into one document) INFORMATION REDACTED IN THE FOLLOWING REPORT NON-CONFIDENTIAL SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The information redacted contains names for each employee holding a position identified in Sections 15.d.1 (“Well Control Personnel”) and 15.d.3 (“Designated Employees”) of the Consent Decree as of the date of submission, January 2014. VERSION REDACTED 15.d.1(CD) Well Control Personnel and 15.d.3(CD) Designated Employees 01.24.14 (redacted) 15.d.1(CD) List of Well Control Personnel and 15.d.3(CD) Designated Employees 01.24.14 (Note the list of employees required under 15.d.1 and 15.d.3 are identical and have been combined into one document) Last Name First Name Current Assignment Position Discoverer Deep Seas Toolpusher Discoverer Enterprise Driller Discoverer Deep Seas Driller GSF Development Driller I Driller Deepwater Champion Toolpusher Discoverer Spirit Toolpusher Development Driller III Sr Toolpusher Deepwater Pathfinder Toolpusher Deepwater Pathfinder Toolpusher GSF Development Driller II Driller Discoverer Clear Leader Driller Discoverer Spirit Driller Development Driller III Driller Discoverer Inspiration Toolpusher Discoverer Inspiration Driller Discoverer Clear Leader Sr Toolpusher GSF C. R. Luigs Driller Deepwater Nautilus Toolpusher Discoverer Enterprise OIM Offshore Inst Mgr Discoverer Clear Leader VERSIONDriller INFORMATION GSF C. R. Luigs
  • We Put You First. and Keep You Ahead

    We Put You First. and Keep You Ahead

    A O Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page BEF MaGS Top o eng Botto res Upstream, downstream and around the world, FMC Technologies partners closely with you to overcome a wide range of technical, economic and project life-cycle challenges. We engineer solutions and design, manufacture, supply and service sophisticated technologies. We make ultra-deepwater production feasible, extend the lives of mature fi elds and make everyday processes like custody transfer and fl uid loading safer and more reliable. From exploration to delivery, our innovations maximize performance, minimize costs and optimize bottom line results. We put you fi rst. And keep you ahead. www.fmctechnolo_______________________gies.co © 2010 FMC Technologies. All rights res A O Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page BEF MaGS A O Previous Page Contents Zoom In Zoom Out Front Cover Search Issue Next Page BEF MaGS Under the Patronage of H.E Abdullah Bin Hamad Al-Attiyah Deputy Prime Minister & Minister for Energy and Industry Conference and Exhibition 12 – 14 October 2010 DohaQatar INVITATION TO ATTEND UNIQUELY Register Online Today & Save €100* FOCUSED www.offshoremiddleeast.com Offshore Middle East 2010, the only event dedicated to offshore oil and gas technology in UNIQUELY the Middle East, will enable you to make important connections in the region’s offshore oil and gas industry. The event provides a forum where industry leaders can address technical issues, introduce pioneering technology and share lessons learned about finding, developing OFFSHORE and producing oil in the Middle East offshore regions.
  • Thomas Yuen , Et Al. V. Transocean Ltd., Et Al. 10-CV-01467

    Thomas Yuen , Et Al. V. Transocean Ltd., Et Al. 10-CV-01467

    Case 2:10-cv-01467-JCZ-SS Document 1 Filed 05/13/10 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA THOMAS YUEN and SUMNI AHN, ) Civil Action No. Individually and on Behalf of All Others ) Similarly Situated, ) COMPLAINT - CLASS ACTION ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) TRANSOCEAN LTD. and STEVEN L. ) NEWMAN, ) Defendants. ) ) )DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS Case 2:10-cv-01467-JCZ-SS Document 1 Filed 05/13/10 Page 2 of 22 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 1. This is a securities fraud class action on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of Transocean Ltd. (“Transocean” or the “Company”) between August 5, 2009 and May 7, 2010, inclusive (the “Class Period”). This action is brought against Transocean and one of its senior officers and/or directors for violations of § § 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“1934 Act”) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder in connection with the dissemination of false and misleading statements about the Company’s deficient safety protocols, recurring blowout preventer (“BOP”) problems, and its operating and safety record. 2. Transocean is an owner and/or operator of approximately 140 mobile offshore drilling units. During the Class Period, defendants falsely represented that Transocean had remedied its past safety problems and was closely monitoring the Company’s operating and equipment, while omitting to disclose material information concerning Transocean’s repeated safety failures and recurring BOP issues. Defendants falsely represented that the Company’s BOP problems “have all been resolved,” and that BOP issues were “anomalies,” concealing that the Company had not eliminated BOP issues nor rectified the prior BOP failures.
  • Pdf Fiolek, A., Pikula, L., Voss, B., 2010

    Pdf Fiolek, A., Pikula, L., Voss, B., 2010

    775 A publication of CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS VOL. 48, 2016 The Italian Association of Chemical Engineering Online at www.aidic.it/cet Guest Editors: Eddy de Rademaeker, Peter Schmelzer Copyright © 2016, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l., ISBN 978-88-95608-39-6; ISSN 2283-9216 DOI: 10.3303/CET1648130 A Thorough Analysis of the Engineering Solutions Deployed to Stop the Oil Spill Following the Deepwater Horizon Disaster Thibaut Eude*, Aldo Napoli, Franck Guarnieri MINES ParisTech, Centre for research on risks and crises, Rue Claude Daunesse, B.P. 207, 06904 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex, France; PSL Research University [email protected] The Deepwater Horizon drilling accident that occurred on 20 April 2010 was a two-fold catastrophe. The initial total loss of the drilling rig was followed by one of the worst environmental disasters in recent history. The four million barrels of oil that were released into the Gulf of Mexico continue to impact human activities in the area. The Macondo well incident (Mississippi Canyon 252-1, leased by BP as the primary operator) was the first deep subsea blowout in the history of the oil and gas industry, and both the United States’ government and the private sector were unprepared to deal with it. All of the safety system’s lines of defence failed and the response required multiple courses of actions to be taken to address an unprecedented situation. It was imperative to deliver the best engineering solutions under intense and ongoing pressure in a very harsh and highly stressful operational environment. In this paper we review the engineering solutions considered by the response teams.
  • Deepwater Horizon Source Control

    Deepwater Horizon Source Control

    Deepwater Horizon Source Control June 30, 2010 Federal & BP Working Relationship • Independent Analysis DOE/DOI BP + Contractors • Information Flow + Industry • Integrated Design Reviews External Science Design Advisors • Development of Joint Action Plans On-Site DOI + Analysis DOE Labs Team • Decision Engagement Operations Reach Back to Labs Key Decisions Path Forward via Unified Command Strategy and Forward Plan • Run a Safe Operation • Long Term – Relief Wells • Short Term – Containment − Option to Shut-in Well; Test Integrity • Leverage Industry and Government Expertise • Multiple Parallel Options • No Stone Unturned to Minimize Pollution Containment: Early July Capacity 40 – 53 mbd Containment: Offshore Operations Helix Producer Air Can in Moonpool Toisa Pisces Subsea Manifold Loch Rannoch NewNew ManifoldManifold 49’49’ x x 25’25’ x x 11’11’ 4545 TonsTons SuctionSuction PilesPiles 14’14’ Diameter Diameter 90’90’ Long Long Containment: Simultaneous Operations 40+ Vessels 1500+ People Total Oil Recovered: LMRP Cap + Q4000 (Approximate volumes) Cum . LM RP Cap Cum . Q4000 Daily 80 19.4 million gallons ~ 462 500 450 70 400 60 326 350 50 300 249 40 250 204 24 mbopd ~ 1 million gallons/day 200 30 150 27 150 Total Daily Rate, mbopd Rate, Daily Total 104 26 20 25 25 25 24 23 24 23 23 21 58 100 18 17 10 15 15 16 15 16 15 15 15 50 11 11 10 Barrels Thousands Recovered, Cumulative 6 0 0 6/4 6/6 6/8 6/10 6/12 6/14 6/16 6/18 6/20 6/22 6/24 6/26 6/28 Start up of Q4000 Does not include 22,000 barrels recovered from RIT tool in May Containment: Mid July Onwards Capacity 60– 80 mbd Advantages of Further Enhancements • Reduce Hurricane Impact − Demobe/Mobe 4 days vs.
  • Plan Coordinator, FO, Plans Section (MS 5231)

    Plan Coordinator, FO, Plans Section (MS 5231)

    UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT October 14, 2020 MEMORANDUM To: Public Information (MS 5030) From: Plan Coordinator, FO, Plans Section (MS 5231) Subject: Public Information copy of plan Control # - S-08025 Type - Supplemental Exploration Plan Lease(s) - OCS-G33335 Block - 642 Keathley Canyon Area OCS-G33341 Block - 686 Keathley Canyon Area OCS-G33918 Block - 687 Keathley Canyon Area Operator - LLOG Exploration Offshore, L.L.C. Description - Subsea Wells D, ALT D, E, and ALT E Rig Type - DP Semisubmersible and Drillship Attached is a copy of the subject plan. It has been deemed submitted as of this date and is under review for approval. Chiquita Hill Plan Coordinator Site Type/Name Botm Lse/Area/Blk Surface Location Surf Lse/Area/Blk WELL/ALT D G33335/KC/642 888 FNL, 1186 FEL G33341/KC/686 WELL/ALT E G33918/KC/687 990 FNL, 1193 FEL G33341/KC/686 WELL/D G33335/KC/642 938 FNL, 1192 FEL G33341/KC/686 WELL/E G33918/KC/687 940 FNL, 1190 FEL G33341/KC/686 LLOG EXPLORATION OFFSHORE, L.L.C. 1001 Ochsner Boulevard, Suite 100 Covington, Louisiana 70433 SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN OF EXPLORATION OCS-G-33341 / OCS-G-33918 / OCS-G-33335 LEASES KEATHLEY CANYON BLOCK 686 / 687 / 642 PUBLIC INFORMATION COPY Prepared By: Sue Sachitana Regulatory Specialist LLOG Exploration Offshore, L.L.C. 985-801-4300 – Office 985-801-4716 – Direct [email protected] Date: September 16, 2020 Supplemental Exploration Plan Plan S-8025 Keathley Canyon Block 686 / 687 / 642 OCS-G-33341 / OCS-G-33918 / OCS – G- 33335 Leases AMENDED COPY RECORD OF CHANGES DATE SECTION-PAGE BRIEF SYMOPSIS 9/23/2020 Appendix E Paragraph G corrected area and block from Mississippi Canyon Block 505 to Keathley Canyon Block 686.