Aceclofenac in Osteoarthritis - NSAID with Novel Mechanism of Action
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Aceclofenac As a Potential Threat to Critically Endangered Vultures in India: a Review Author(S): Pradeep Sharma Source: Journal of Raptor Research, 46(3):314-318
Aceclofenac as a Potential Threat to Critically Endangered Vultures in India: A Review Author(s): Pradeep Sharma Source: Journal of Raptor Research, 46(3):314-318. 2012. Published By: The Raptor Research Foundation DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3356/JRR-11-66.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.3356/JRR-11-66.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/ page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non- commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. SHORT COMMUNICATIONS J. Raptor Res. 46(3):314–318 E 2012 The Raptor Research Foundation, Inc. ACECLOFENAC AS A POTENTIAL THREAT TO CRITICALLY ENDANGERED VULTURES IN INDIA:AREVIEW PRADEEP SHARMA1 Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Biotechnology, Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Science, Bikaner 334001, Rajasthan, India KEY WORDS: Vultures; Gyps; aceclofenac; diclofenac; India; cations in humans (Kay and Alldred 2003) and marked South Asia; toxicity. analgesic, antiarthritic and antipyretic properties. -
Studies in Laboratory Animals to Assess the Safety of Anti-Inflammatory Agents in Acute Porphyria
Ann Rheum Dis: first published as 10.1136/ard.46.7.540 on 1 July 1987. Downloaded from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1987; 46, 540-542 Studies in laboratory animals to assess the safety of anti-inflammatory agents in acute porphyria KENNETH E L McCOLL, GEORGE G THOMPSON, AND MICHAEL R MOORE From the University Department of Medicine, Western Infirmary, Glasgow SUMMARY The safety of various anti-inflammatory drugs in acute porphyria was assessed by examining their effect on rat hepatic haem synthesis. Azapropazone, chloroquine, and gold increased 6-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) synthase activity, indicating that they are liable to precipitate porphyric crises. Aspirin, ibuprofen, indomethacin, ketoprofen, flurbiprofen, phenylbutazone, naproxen, prednisolone, and penicillamine did not increase ALA synthase activity and should be safe in porphyria. Though these animal studies can be used as a guide to prescribing in patients with acute porphyria, some caution is still required as species may vary in their response to inducing agents. Key words: chloroquine, azapropazone, gold, b-aminolaevulinic acid synthase. copyright. The acute hepatic porphyrias which comprise acute controlling enzyme of haem biosynthesis 6- intermittent porphyria, hereditary coproporphyria, aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) synthase in rat hepatic and variegate porphyria are examples of pharma- tissue. To confirm the reliability of the animal cogenetic disease. They are the result of deficien- model, phenobarbitone was also tested. For each cies of individual enzymes in the pathway of haem drug examined six male Sprague-Dawley rats re- biosynthesis and are inherited in an autosomal ceived the test drug and six control rats received the dominant fashion.2 Subjects with the genetic trait appropriate placebo solution. -
Rationale of Aceclofenac in Management of Pyrexia in Paediatric Practice
ISSN: 2574-1241 Volume 5- Issue 4: 2018 DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2018.11.002112 Avinash Shankar. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res Research Article Open Access Rationale of Aceclofenac in Management of Pyrexia in Paediatric Practice Avinash Shankar*1, Amresh Shankar2 and Anuradha Shankar3 1Postgraduate in Endocrinology & Metabolism (AIIMS Delhi), Chairman National Institute of Health & Research Warisaliganj (Nawada), India 2Aarogyam Punarjeevan Ram Bhawan, India 3Centre for Indigenous Medicine & Research Senior Research Fellow Regional Institute of Ayurveda, India Received: : November 19, 2018; Published: : November 28, 2018 *Corresponding author: Avinash Shankar, Postgraduate in Endocrinology & Metabolism (AIIMS Delhi) Chairman National Institute of Health & Research Warisaliganj (Nawada) Bihar, India Abstract Pyrexia, a complex physiological response triggered by infection or aseptic stimuli causes increase in Prostaglandin E2(PGE2)concentration children with pyrexia of varied origin and to calm the temperature at optimal level various therapeutics are in vogue but attendance of children with antipyreticsin brain and adversity later firing presenting rate of neuronesas morbidity of thermoregulatoryand mortality necessiated centre i.e.an evaluationHypothalamus. of presenting Majority hazardsattendance with at consuming paediatrician antipyretics. chamber are of Objective of Study: Analyse the rationality of Aceclofenac paracetamol combination, as antipyretics in paediatric practice. Material & Methods: Analysis of datasheet of patients admitted with antipyretics adversity at Centre For Children Disease & Research. Result: Children consuming Aceclofenac Sodium Paracetamol presented with grave status of prolonged hypothermia, CNS disturbances like Dizziness, Convulsion, coma in addition to more pronounced other presentation like persistant vomiting, haematemesis, blood dyscariasis, rash, albuminuria than other. Conclusion: Acceclofenac sodium Paracetamol combination must be restricted for paediatrics use considering its dreaded outcome. -
Drug-Induced Peptic Ulcer Disease
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OAR@UM risk populations only.7 The prevalence of endoscopically confirmed gastrointestinal ulcers in NSAID users is quoted to be between 15% and 30%. Between 12% to 30% of NSAID-induced ulcers are gastric ulcers, whereas 2% to 19% are duodenal ulcers. NSAID-induced ulcers are symptomatic only in 1% of patients after three to six months and in 2 to 4% of patients after one year. Inappropriately they do not correlate well with pain because the analgesic action of NSAIDs may mask the ulcer pain.2 Drug-induced peptic Understanding the method by which NSAIDs cause gastric damage has helped in the development of prophylactic agents that ulcer disease 1 red uce their toxicity. The mechanism by which NSAIDs are thought to damage the Valerie Vella B Pharm(Hons), PgDip Clin Pharm (Aberdeen) gastrointestinal tract is four-fold. Clinical Pharmacist, St Luke’s Hospital, Guardamangia, Malta a) Topical injury Email: [email protected] Originally it was thought that NSAIDs damaged the gastric epithelium by Key words: Peptic ulcer, medicines, prostaglandins, gastrointestinal protection, intracellular accumulation of these drugs in gastrointestinal toxicity an ionised state.1 However the fact that enteric-coated formulations, pro-drugs, For more than a century, peptic ulcer disease has been a rectal and parenteral administration of 1 major cause of morbidity and mortality. Peptic ulcer disease NSAIDs still resulted in gastrointestinal is a heterogeneous group of disorders involving the damage despite the apparent absence of gastrointestinal tract and results from an imbalance between direct mucosal contact implies a minor role the aggressive forces of gastric acid and pepsin and the for topical injury1,2. -
Comparison of Efficacy of Diclofenac Versus Aceclofenac
The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery ISPUB.COM Volume 19 Number 2 Comparison of Efficacy of Diclofenac versus Aceclofenac in Post Operative Pain in Lower limb fractures: a Double blind, Randomized Study V Sharma, B Awasthi, S Rana, S Sharma Citation V Sharma, B Awasthi, S Rana, S Sharma. Comparison of Efficacy of Diclofenac versus Aceclofenac in Post Operative Pain in Lower limb fractures: a Double blind, Randomized Study. The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery. 2012 Volume 19 Number 2. Abstract INTRODUCTION: Providing effective postoperative analgesia is a significant challenge in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Non steroidal anti-inflammatory group of drugs is used mostly to achieve it. This clinical study was done to investigate efficacy of Injectable Aceclofenac over inj. Diclofenac in patients with severe postoperative pain in lower limb fractures. METHODS: 100 patients (aged 18-60 yr) of lower limb fractures were enrolled as per inclusion criteria . They were randomly assigned to Group A or Group B (50 patients each ) .Severe pain was postoperative pain 7 or >7 on Numerical Rating Scale. For postoperative analgesia, in Group A Inj. Aceclofenac ( 12 hourly) and in Group B Inj. Diclofenac (8 hourly) was given . To abort pain in case of no relief Inj. Tramadol was given. Decrease in Numerical Rating Scale score in either the group and associated adverse effects were noted . Patients’ overall subjective response to therapy was rated as poor , fair , good or excellent . RESULTS: After treatment at 10 min. only the mean pain score had 47.8% fall in Group A and 40.3% in Group B. -
S1 Table. List of Medications Analyzed in Present Study Drug
S1 Table. List of medications analyzed in present study Drug class Drugs Propofol, ketamine, etomidate, Barbiturate (1) (thiopental) Benzodiazepines (28) (midazolam, lorazepam, clonazepam, diazepam, chlordiazepoxide, oxazepam, potassium Sedatives clorazepate, bromazepam, clobazam, alprazolam, pinazepam, (32 drugs) nordazepam, fludiazepam, ethyl loflazepate, etizolam, clotiazepam, tofisopam, flurazepam, flunitrazepam, estazolam, triazolam, lormetazepam, temazepam, brotizolam, quazepam, loprazolam, zopiclone, zolpidem) Fentanyl, alfentanil, sufentanil, remifentanil, morphine, Opioid analgesics hydromorphone, nicomorphine, oxycodone, tramadol, (10 drugs) pethidine Acetaminophen, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (36) (celecoxib, polmacoxib, etoricoxib, nimesulide, aceclofenac, acemetacin, amfenac, cinnoxicam, dexibuprofen, diclofenac, emorfazone, Non-opioid analgesics etodolac, fenoprofen, flufenamic acid, flurbiprofen, ibuprofen, (44 drugs) ketoprofen, ketorolac, lornoxicam, loxoprofen, mefenamiate, meloxicam, nabumetone, naproxen, oxaprozin, piroxicam, pranoprofen, proglumetacin, sulindac, talniflumate, tenoxicam, tiaprofenic acid, zaltoprofen, morniflumate, pelubiprofen, indomethacin), Anticonvulsants (7) (gabapentin, pregabalin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, carbamazepine, valproic acid, lacosamide) Vecuronium, rocuronium bromide, cisatracurium, atracurium, Neuromuscular hexafluronium, pipecuronium bromide, doxacurium chloride, blocking agents fazadinium bromide, mivacurium chloride, (12 drugs) pancuronium, gallamine, succinylcholine -
Individual Nsaids and Upper Gastrointestinal Complications a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies (The SOS Project)
Drug Saf 2012; 35 (12): 1127-1146 SYSTEMATIC REVIEW 0114-5916/12/0012-1127 Adis ª 2012 Castellsague et al., publisher and licensee Springer International Publishing AG. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons License ‘‘Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 3.0‘‘ (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original work is properly cited and not altered. Individual NSAIDs and Upper Gastrointestinal Complications A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies (the SOS Project) Jordi Castellsague,1 Nuria Riera-Guardia,1 Brian Calingaert,2 Cristina Varas-Lorenzo,1 Annie Fourrier-Reglat,3 Federica Nicotra,4 Miriam Sturkenboom5 and Susana Perez-Gutthann1, on behalf of the investigators of the Safety of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (SOS) Project 1 RTI Health Solutions, Barcelona, Spain 2 RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA 3 Universite V. Segalen, Bordeaux, France 4 University Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy 5 Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands Abstract Background: The risk of upper gastrointestinal (GI) complications associated with the use of NSAIDs is a serious public health concern. The risk varies between individual NSAIDs; however, there is little information on the risk associated with some NSAIDs and on the impact of risk factors. These data are necessary to evaluate the benefit-risk of individual NSAIDs for clinical and health policy decision making. Within the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme, the Safety Of non-Steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) [SOS] project aims to develop decision models for regulatory and clinical use of individual NSAIDs according to their GI and cardiovascular safety. -
Long-Term Use of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Risk of Atrial Fibrillation
ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION Long-term Use of Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Risk of Atrial Fibrillation Raffaele De Caterina, MD, PhD; Ana Ruigo´mez, MD, PhD; Luı´s Alberto Garcı´a Rodrı´guez, MD, MSc Background: Previous reports have described an asso- ratio [RR], 2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56- ciation between the use of corticosteroids (steroidal anti- 3.97). However, we also found that the current use of inflammatory drugs [SAIDs]) and the risk of atrial fibril- NSAIDs was associated with an increased risk of chronic lation (AF). We sought to determine the existence of a AF (RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.08-1.91). Such risk was further similar association for non-SAIDs (NSAIDs). increased among long-term users with a treatment du- ration of longer than 1 year (RR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.20- Methods: We identified patients aged 40 to 89 years with 2.72). The increased risk of chronic AF was not ex- a first-ever diagnosis of AF in 1996 in a United King- plained by the occurrence of heart failure. The use of dom primary care database and classified them as hav- NSAIDs was not associated with paroxysmal AF. ing paroxysmal or chronic AF. After validation with their primary care physicians, 1035 patients were confirmed Conclusions: The use of NSAIDs, as for SAIDs, is asso- as having incident chronic AF and 525 as having parox- ciated with an increased risk of chronic AF. Because the ysmal AF. Two separate nested case-control analyses es- use of anti-inflammatory drugs in general is a marker for timated the risk of first-time chronic and paroxysmal AF underlying inflammatory disorders, inflammation may among users of SAIDs and NSAIDs. -
Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
Non Steroidal Anti‐inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) 4 signs of inflammation • Redness ‐ due to local vessel dilatation • Heat ‐ due to local vessel dilatation • Swelling – due to influx of plasma proteins and phagocytic cells into the tissue spaces • Pain – due to local release of enzymes and increased tissue pressure NSAIDs • Cause relief of pain ‐. analgesic • Suppress the signs and symptoms of inflammation. • Exert antipyretic action. • Useful in pain related to inflammation. Esp for superficial/integumental pain . Classification of NSAIDs • Salicylates: aspirin, Sodium salicylate & diflunisal. • Propionic acid derivatives: ibuprofen, ketoprofen, naproxen. • Aryl acetic acid derivatives: diclofenac, ketorolac • Indole derivatives: indomethacin, sulindac • Alkanones: Nabumetone. • Oxicams: piroxicam, tenoxicam Classification of NSAIDs ….. • Anthranilic acid derivatives (fenamates): mefenamic acid and flufenamic acid. • Pyrazolone derivatives: phenylbutazone, oxyphenbutazone, azapropazone (apazone) & dipyrone (novalgine). • Aniline derivatives (analgesic only): paracetamol. Clinical Classif. • Non selective Irreversible COX inhibitors • Non slective Reversible COX inhibitors • Preferential COX 2 inhibitors • 10‐20 fold cox 2 selective • meloxicam, etodolac, nabumetone • Selective COX 2 inhibitors • > 50 fold COX ‐2 selective • Celecoxib, Etoricoxib, Rofecoxib, Valdecoxib • COX 3 Inhibitor? PCM Cyclooxygenase‐1 (COX‐1): -constitutively expressed in wide variety of cells all over the body. -"housekeeping enzyme" -ex. gastric cytoprotection, hemostasis Cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2): -inducible enzyme -dramatically up-regulated during inflammation (10-18X) -constitutive : maintains renal blood flow and renal electrolyte homeostasis Salicylates Acetyl salicylic acid (aspirin). Kinetics: • Well absorbed from the stomach, more from upper small intestine. • Distributed all over the body, 50‐80% bound to plasma protein (albumin). • Metabolized to acetic acid and salicylates (active metabolite). • Salicylate is conjugated with glucuronic acid and glycine. • Excreted by the kidney. -
Celofen® Aceclofenac
Only for the use of Medical Professionals Celofen® Aceclofenac Presentation Celofen® 100mg Tablets: Round, light pink colored film coated tablet, one side embossed with 'ACI' and other side with a break line. Each tablet contains 100mg Aceclofenac BP. Description Celofen® is a non-steroidal agent with anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties. Its mechanism of action is largely based on inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis. Celofen® is a potent inhibitor of the enzyme cyclooxygenase, which is involved in the production of prostaglandins. Indications & uses Celofen® is indicated in relieving pain and inflammation in osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Dosage & administration Adults: The maximum recommended dose is 200mg daily, taken as two separate 100mg doses, one tablet in the morning and one in the evening. Children: There is no clinical data on the use of Aceclofenac in children. Elderly: The pharmacokinetics of Aceclofenac are not altered in elderly patients, therefore it is not considered necessary to modify the dose and dose frequency. Renal insufficiency: There is no evidence that the dosage of Aceclofenac needs to be modified in patients with mild renal impairment. Hepatic insufficiency: The dose of Aceclofenac should be reduced in patients with hepatic impairment. An initial daily dose of 100mg should be administered. Contraindications, warnings, etc. Contraindications: Aceclofenac is contraindicated in patients previously sensitive to Aceclofenac or aspirin or other NSAIDs. It should not be administered to patients with active or suspected peptic ulcer or gastrointestinal bleeding and moderate to severe renal impairment. Precautions: Aceclofenac should be administered with caution to patients with symptoms indicative of gastrointestinal disorders, with a history of peptic ulceration, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, hepatic porphyria, and coagulation disorders. -
Variable in Their Efficacy? a Description of Ion Trapping
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 1993; 52: 241-243 241 HYPOTHESIS Why are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs so variable in their efficacy? A description of ion trapping G A Ellis, D R Blake Hypothesis Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs vary in Our hypothesis is that acidic non-steroidal their aqueous solubility, but most are highly anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) undergo albumin bound and will be co-distributed with ion trapping in acidotic tissue and that this this protein. Diffusion of an NSAID into the affects not only their gastrotoxicity, which is cell follows Fick's law, as it is dependent on the well known, but also their selectivity for, and concentration gradient across the plasma their efficacy in, inflammatory joint disease. membrane and the lipid/water partition Tissue acidosis may not be a feature of all coefficient of the drug molecule. chronic inflammatory disease states, but it does For weak acids, such as most NSAIDs, the occur in inflammatory joint disease and is effective concentration gradient is that of the highly variable depending on the extent of the non-ionised form, as ionised molecules are not mismatch between synovial perfusion and lipid soluble metabolic demand. This mismatch is influ- HD D- + H+ enced not only by disease activity, but also by Non-ionised Ionised joint movement, which causes transient hypoxic episodes. Interventions, such as rest The position ofthe equilibrium depends on the and drug treatment, would serve to reduce ion intrinsic ionisation constant of the molecule trapping and, therefore, NSAID efficacy (pKa) and on the pH value of the aqueous through their effects on disease activity. -
Prescribing Pattern of Nsaids in Orthopedic Department of Dhaka Medical College Hospital Rahman Ka1 , Kamal Ahmm2, Akhter S 3, Khatun K 4, Afroz R5, Akther T6
PRESCRIBING PATTERN OF NSAIDS IN ORTHOPEDIC DEPARTMENT OF DHAKA MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL RAHMAN KA1 , KAMAL AHMM2, AKHTER S 3, KHATUN K 4, AFROZ R5, AKTHER T6 Abstract Context : Drug therapy is the most commonly used method in disease treatment in general practice. The pattern of drug prescription are often inappropriate and need for registration of these patterns is essentian in an effort to improve prescribing standard. Nonsteroidal anti- inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a drug class that groups together drugs that provide analgesic (pain-killing) and antipyretic (fever-reliefing) effects, and, in higher doses, anti-inflammatory effects. Non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs are the most common drugs prescribed in the world over specially in the orthopedic department. The study of prescribing pattern of NSAIDs in the orthopedic department was conducted to monitor, evaluate and if necessary suggest modification in the prescribing behavior of the medical practitioner to make it rational and cost effective. Material and Methods: The present study was performed on 300 (Three hundred) prescriptions from both admitted and outpatients (OPD) of the orthopedic department of Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka. The check list type of data was collected with prior permission from the concern department and the authority. The study was cross sectional analytical type and was conducted in the department of Pharmacology, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka, from July 2010 to June 2011. Result : In case of OPD patients most common NSAIDs prescribed to the patients were aceclofenac (44.7%); followed by diclofenac (23.3%). Other NSAIDs were naproxen, ketorolac and ibuprofen 8%, 15.3% and 5.4% respectively.