DOCSLIB.ORG

2016-2017 V.Dec 2016 National Officials Program LEVEL II Alpine, Para Alpine, Ski Cross

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2016-2017 V.Dec 2016 National Officials Program LEVEL II Alpine, Para Alpine, Ski Cross Alpine Canada 2016-2017 v.Dec 2016 National Officials Program LEVEL II Alpine, Para Alpine, Ski Cross Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction & Course Objectives ............................................................................................................. 6 2.0 National Officials Program ........................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Level II Official ....................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Level III Official ...................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Level IV Official ...................................................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Officials Code of Conduct ...................................................................................................................... 8 2.4.1 Disciplinary Action Against Officials .............................................................................................. 8 2.5 Officials Positions .................................................................................................................................. 9 2.6 Requirements for Higher Certification ................................................................................................ 10 2.6.1 Level III ........................................................................................................................................ 10 2.6.2 Level IV ........................................................................................................................................ 11 2.7 Officials Requirements to Maintain Certification ............................................................................... 11 3.0 Technical Delegate Program ................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 TD Levels and Criteria .......................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 National Technical Delegate Candidate Program ............................................................................... 12 4.0 Race Organization ................................................................................................................................... 13 4.1 Abbreviations and Terminology .......................................................................................................... 13 4.2 Organizing Committee ........................................................................................................................ 15 4.2.1 The Jury ....................................................................................................................................... 15 4.2.2. Race Committee Members ............................................................................................................... 15 4.2.2 Race Personnel On Hill Locations ................................................................................................ 18 4.3 Case Study 1 ........................................................................................................................................ 19 5.0 Race Administration ................................................................................................................................ 19 5.1 Race Notice ......................................................................................................................................... 19 5.2 Team Captains’ Meeting ........................................................................................................................... 19 5.3 Race Office Checklist ................................................................................................................................. 20 5.4 Starting Orders .......................................................................................................................................... 21 5.4.1 1st Run Starting Order ......................................................................................................................... 21 5.4.2 2nd Race Start Order – Two, One Run Race Events ............................................................................ 22 5.4.3 Starting Order For 2nd Run.................................................................................................................. 22 5.4.4 Start Order For 2nd Run At FIS Race .................................................................................................... 24 5.5 Case Study 2 .............................................................................................................................................. 24 6.0 Race Jury ................................................................................................................................................. 25 6.1 Composition of Jury ............................................................................................................................ 25 6.2 General Responsibilities of the Jury .................................................................................................... 26 6.3 Qualifications for Jury and Other Officials .......................................................................................... 26 6.3.1 Race Officials for NON‐FIS DH, SG Events ................................................................................... 26 6.3.2 Race Officials for NON‐FIS Technical Events ............................................................................... 27 6.3.3 Race Officials for FIS Races (All Disciplines) ................................................................................ 27 6.3.4 Entry Level and Division League Events ...................................................................................... 27 6.3.5 National Masters Races ............................................................................................................... 27 6.4 Racer Down Protocol ........................................................................................................................... 28 Context: ....................................................................................................................................................... 28 Protocol: ...................................................................................................................................................... 28 6.5 Case Study 3 ........................................................................................................................................ 30 7.0 Re‐Runs, Disqualifications, Protests, Interrupted Runs and Termination of a Race ............................... 32 7.1 Re‐Runs ............................................................................................................................................... 32 7.2 Interruption of the Run or Training ..................................................................................................... 32 7.3 Termination of a Competition ............................................................................................................. 32 7.4 No Permitted to Start (NPS) ................................................................................................................ 33 7.5 Disqualifications .................................................................................................................................. 33 7.6 Sanctions ............................................................................................................................................. 33 7.7 Protests ............................................................................................................................................... 34 7.8 Case Study 4 ........................................................................................................................................ 34 8.0 The Race Course ...................................................................................................................................... 38 8.2 Regulations and Rules for FIS and National Calendared Events ............................................................... 39 8.3 Course Preparation ................................................................................................................................... 39 8.3.1 Preparing The Course ......................................................................................................................... 40 8.3.2 Snow Preparation ............................................................................................................................... 41 8.4 Protection / Safety Installations ................................................................................................................ 41 8.4.1 Fencing ............................................................................................................................................... 42 8.4.1.1 A‐NET System .............................................................................................................................. 42 8.4.1.2 B‐NET System .............................................................................................................................. 43 8.4.2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,746,769 B2 Owen (45) Date of Patent: Jun
    US008746769B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,746,769 B2 Owen (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 10, 2014 (54) PORTABLESKIAND SKI POLE CARRIER (56) References Cited SYSTEM U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS (71) Applicant: David B. Owen, Stevenson Ranch, CA (US) 946,850 A 1/1910 Tabler 3.278,097 A 10, 1966 Duckworth 3,768,711 A 10, 1973 Wiki (72) Inventor: David B. Owen, Stevenson Ranch, CA 4,114,838 A * 9/1978 Arson . 294,157 (US) 4,402,542 A 9/1983 Kreutzer 4.483.380 A 11/1984 Beran (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 4,553,779 A 1 1/1985 Shortridge patent is extended or adjusted under 35 4,705,281. A 1 1/1987 Spinas U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. 4,746,159 A 5, 1988 Webb et al. 4,852.931 A 8, 1989 Ferdi (21) Appl. No.: 14/042,400 4,856,689 A ck 8, 1989 Shore ............................ 224,218 (Continued) (22) Filed: Sep. 30, 2013 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (65) Prior Publication Data DE 42 1885.0 A1 12, 1993 US 2014/0028041 A1 Jan. 30, 2014 FR 2 637 193 A1 6, 1990 Related U.S. Application Data (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 13/044,253, Primary Examiner - Dean Kramer filed on Mar. 9, 2011, now Pat. No. 8,616,600. (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Kelly & Kelley, LLP (60) Provisional application No. 61/314,710, filed on Mar. 17, 2010, provisional application No. 61/352.907, (57) ABSTRACT filed on Jun.
    [Show full text]
  • Slalom Poles & Stubbies Slope Marking & Caution Poles Barrier Tape Drill Bits B-Net C-Net Gate Panels Race Bibs Radio Chest Pack
    Slalom poles & stubbies Slope marking & caution poles Barrier tape Drill bits Warranty Gate panels B-net 1 year on flex pole shaft, bases & hinge Race bibs C-net Radio chest pack Warranty We are so confident in our product that we offer a 1 year warranty on all flex-pole shafts, bases and flexes. The past seasons this has resulted in less than 3% average warranty claim rate. Weight BAW gates are about 10% lighter than many competitors’ gates using metal hinges. It may not sound like allot, but matters when one carries 20-30 gate bundles. History BAW do not have as short history as one may think. It all originated in Östersund, Sweden. Liftbyggarna produced in the late 70's some of the very first flex plastic poles, that also where sold in North America. As Lift- byggarna decided to concentrate on lift building, US Reliable Racing Sup- ply (RRS) were given the permission NEW! MID Featherbase to continue with what today is Break- Offers less recistance during course pulling, A-Way slalom poles. And the first yet great performance. A great alternative for hinged poles ever to be used in a WC- those that feel the Featherbase can be tough event where BAW in Waterville Valley to pull out off the snow yet seek featherbase 1980. BAW was the official supplier of has in just a few years established itself as stay-put performance. the Nagano Olympics as well as the a major slalom pole supplier in Europe. WC-finals and World Championships Not at all surprising considering: Shafts now with even in Vail.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 11 Glossary of Ski Terms by Skis.Com 9/6/2015
    Glossary of Ski Terms by Skis.com Page 1 of 11 Home > Ski-O-Pedia > Glossary of Ski Terms Glossary of Ski Terms By Steve Kopitz 12/18/2012 Skiing and snowboarding are two of the greatest winter sports on the planet, and like anything else in this world the two sports have certain terms and jargon that can be confusing without a bit of definition. Below you will find a number of terms/phrases used in skiing and snowboarding to refer to products, clothing, and the sports of skiing and snowboarding in general. We have provided a brief definition to help clear up any confusion or questions you may have on these terms/phrases. A ABS Sidewall: Industry term for a type of edge construction on skis and snowboards using high quality ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene) plastic. All-Mountain Ski: A large percentage of Alpine skis fall into this category. All-Mountain skis are designed to perform in all types of snow conditions and at most speeds. Other names for this style of ski include Mid- Fat skis, All-Purpose skis, and the One-ski Quiver. Alpine Skiing: Downhill skiing, as opposed to Nordic Skiing. Après-Ski: The day’s over – time for drinks and swapping war stories from the slopes. Audio Helmet: A helmet wired with speakers that allows you to listen to music while skiing. Avalanche Beacon: A safety device worn by skiers, snowboarders, and others in case an avalanche traps them. The beacon transmits a signal (typically at the international standard frequency of 457khz) that rescuers can use to locate a buried person.
    [Show full text]
  • World Para Alpine Skiing Rules and Regulations
    World Para Alpine Skiing Rules and Regulations 2018/2019 August 2018 World Para Alpine Skiing Rules and Regulations For Alpine Skiing: Downhill, Super-G, Super Combined, Giant Slalom, Slalom, & Team Events 2018-2019 Season – valid until 1 October 2019 World Para Alpine Skiing Rules and Regulations: Competition Season 2018-2019 1 Contents Section 1: Regulations 300 Joint Regulations for World Para Alpine Skiing (WPAS) 301 WPAS Competitions 302 World Cup (Level 0) and Europa Cup, NORAM (Level 1) Point System, Rankings and Trophies 303 World Para Alpine Skiing Calendar 304 World Para Alpine Skiing Race Licence (WPAS Licence) 305 Race Licence Pre-requisites 306 Competitor’s Obligations and Rights 307 Sponsorships and Advertising 308 Display of Competition Equipment 309 Organisation of Competition 310 Invitation/Programme 311 Competition Administration and Fee Regulations (Athletes and Organising Committees) 312 Competition Entries 313 Team Captains’ Meetings 314 Draw 315 Start List / Publication of Results 316 Competitor Medical Examinations and Compliance with the IPC Anti-Doping Code 317 Medical Services Required from Event Organisers 318 Competition Equipment 319 Equipment Controls 320 Gambling and Competitions 321 Sanctions 322 Procedural Guidelines 323 Protests 324 Place of Submission World Para Alpine Skiing Rules and Regulations: Competition Season 2018-2019 2 325 Deadlines for Submission 326 Form of Protests 327 Protest Fees 328 Authorisation 329 Settlement of Protests by the Jury 330 Appeals Section 2: Rules Common to All Alpine Skiing
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain and Event Outfitters Since 1991
    Mountain and Event Outfitters Since 1991 2017 / 2018 WORLD CUP SUPPLY, INC. B-NET SPM B-Nets and Fence Poles 3 SPM Gates 4-5 7cm & 5cm B-Net B-Nets from SPM set the standard for quality and durability in alpine racing, resort and terrain park safety systems. SPM SPM Gate Panels / Gate Parts 6-7 News for 2017/18 B-Nets feature a knotted mesh made of 3.5mm polyethylene twine treated with UV inhibitors. Air Pads / A-Net Systems 8 Our Mission…. SPM’s Light B-Net with 7cm mesh is an economical safety solution when paired with SPM’s Light B-Net poles, and Bamboo / NewBoo / Impact Pads 9 weighs 34% less and is 30% less expensive than the 5cm. From U12 to FIS, SPM’s “Light” B-Net is used for tech events and as a first line in multiple row set-ups for speed events. The Light system is perfect as a last line for tubing hill run Coaches Tools “World Cup Supply is committed to providing innovative and quality products to the ski B-NET & FENCE POLE PACKAGES 10-11 outs as well as spill zones in terrain parks. racing, resort and event industries. Furthermore, we strongly believe in the role we play in Start To Finish 12-13 SPM’s 5cm B-Net is also available in 20m x 2m sections and features the same 3.5mm twine as the Light B-Net. Rugged Save $$$ when you order complete Race Course Accessories 14 enhancing safety in alpine skiing, alpine ski racing and other action sports.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipc Alpine Skiing/Snowboard Equipment Rule Book
    IPC ALPINE SKIING/SNOWBOARD EQUIPMENT RULE BOOK 2013/2014 Season valid until 1 October 2014 IPC Alpine Skiing reserves the right to further interpret and/or supplement these Rules in order to help ensure that their spirit and purposes are respected. Competition equipment used for IPC Alpine Skiing is regulated according to the FIS Competition Equipment Specifications. Competition equipment The term „competition equipment“ implies all items of equipment used by athletes in competitive skiing, including clothing and implements that serve a technical function. The entire competition equipment forms a functional unit. In this connection the following points must be observed: . the principle of safety . the principle of fairness Competition implements Competition implements refer to equipment which fulfil essential functions during the competition but which can be separated from the actual competition. Examples: skis, bindings, boots, poles, clothing, helmets, ski goggles. Additional equipment (accessories) Additional competition equipment (accessories) are those components or implements which exert an influence on the technical function of the competition equipment and which are attached directly to the equipment by means of recognised fastenings. Such accessories do not perform essential functions during the competition. Example: para-blocks, plastic tip covers, additional weights, back protectors. Protected equipment not defined in the above rules are obliged to sign the IPCAS Waiver ACCEPTANCE OF RISK AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS, to participate in IPCAS competitions. Athletes/Guides must use equipment appropriate for their gender. IPC Alpine Skiing/Snowboard Equipment Rule Book 2 Alpine Racing Skis Definition Skis, predominantly for use in Downhill, Slalom, Giant Slalom and Super- G, racing on suitable terrain and utilising the force of gravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Stand up OTH: ATS Clinic Outline Group Size
    Stand Up OTH: ATS Clinic Outline Group Size: 8-10 Time: 3 hours (new instructors) – 1.5 (returning instructors, combine w/ Holds, Assists, Outriggers) Objectives: Introduce and/or review American Teaching System (ATS), with main focus on levels 1-5. Give instructors knowledge and confidence to implement ATS in their lessons, and to use it to improve their personal skiing. Introduce/review Student Assessment. Safety Message: CKSS approach = Safety first, followed by fun and learning CKSS helmet policy (i.e. required for everyone) • Skier responsibility code • Incident protocol • Introduction:• Overview of clinic. Preview evaluation form and skills to be checked off. Assessment: Get general idea of skiing experience and levels. Check knowledge and/or experience of ATS. Check skier levels on the hill. Goals and Objectives: Each instructor will: demonstrate knowledge of responsibility code demonstrate skills for evaluation sheet check off • demonstrate knowledge of ATS progressions 1-5, applied to lessons & personal skiing • demonstrate awareness of teaching and learning styles, communication approaches, • student assessment and lesson planning/goal setting • Present and Share Information: Demonstrate how to address communication, teaching and learning styles throughout Demonstrate activity progression throughout: static, simple, complex, whole exercise • Guided• Practice: See bullet points on next page Check for understanding: Ask questions and ask for paraphrase, have instructor show understanding by doing tasks • Give feedback using 5Ps:
    [Show full text]
  • Prior Planning, Conditioning Will Help Reduce Injuries on the Slopes
    Prior planning, conditioning will help reduce injuries on the slopes Since its inception in the 1960s, snowboarding has become a popular alternative to alpine skiing. In fact, of the more than 19.7 million Americans in 2010 participating in “sliding snow” sports, 41% were snowboarders—aka “riders” or “shredders.” While both sports share the snowy slopes, there are differences when it comes to injuries, age, experience and gender, according to an 18- year study recently published in the American Journal of Sports Medicine (AJSM). Knowing and understanding these differences gives snowboarders, skiers, equipment manufacturers, ski resorts and medical personnel important insight that ultimately will help make the sports safer and more enjoyable. The study, a first of this magnitude and duration for these sports, collected information between 1988-2006 on injured snowboarders and skiers in a Vermont ski resort base-lodge clinic. It also allowed researchers to assess whether the introduction of terrain parks in 1998 increased the incidence of injury compared to standard slope terrain. In keeping with findings from previous studies, the Vermont study researchers found wrist injuries (contusion, sprain, fracture) the most common for all snowboarders (28%), but only 3% for skiers. Conversely, skiers’ No. 1 injury (28 %) involved knee ligaments (anterior and posterior cruciate [ACL/PCL], and medial and lateral collateral ligaments [MCL:/LCL]), whereas only 6% of snowboarders’ injuries involved knee ligaments. Of those snowboarders with knee ligament injuries, 33% occurred when only one foot was attached to their board. This is significant when compared to all other snowboarding injuries (7%) when only one foot was attached to their board.
    [Show full text]
  • AASI Adaptive Snowboard Guide
    Adaptive Snowboard Guide 2013 1 Updated December 2013 Photo by Larry Pierce/Steamboat Ski Resort Table of Contents Acknowledgments................................................................................................................................3 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................4 Safety, Fun, and Learning ..................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 1: Introduction to the PSIA‐AASI Teaching Model ................................................................... 7 The Teaching Model .................................................................................................................................. 7 The Teaching Cycle .................................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 2: The AASI Snowboard Teaching System .............................................................................. 10 The Y Model ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Movement Concepts ............................................................................................................................... 11 Performance Concepts ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biomechanical Characteristics Related to Poling Propulsive Effectiveness in Cross-Country V2 Skating Technique
    35th Conference of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports, Cologne, Germany, June 14-18, 2017 BIOMECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS RELATED TO POLING PROPULSIVE EFFECTIVENESS IN CROSS-COUNTRY V2 SKATING TECHNIQUE Veronica Bessone1, Florian Paternoster1, Maximilian Stanglmeier1, Michael Veith2, Robert Schuster1, Ansgar Schwirtz1 and Wolfgang Seiberl1 Department of Biomechanics in Sports, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany1 Bavarian Olympic Training Center, Munich, Germany2 The purpose of this study was to investigate whether specific kinetic and kinematic characteristics distinguish the propulsive effectiveness of upper body in V2 cross-country skating technique. Female and male skiers (n=25) performed V2 on a treadmill using roller skis at a 6% incline, while kinetic parameters of plantar pressure and ski pole forces, as well as 3d-kinematic data were collected. The ratio between propulsive and overall impulse (effectiveness) of ski poles was 50% for female and 52% for male athletes and highly correlated with ski pole angles. Male skiers showed smaller pole angles at maximum propulsive force than females (P<0.05). Athletes should consider a more effective ski pole planting angle in order to improve propulsive poling action and consequently their performance. KEYWORDS: kinematics, kinetics, propulsion, efficiency INTRODUCTION: In cross-country skiing, the propulsion of upper and lower body is conveyed to the snow using skis and poles using specific coordinative patterns that distinguish the different sub-techniques. Drag and propulsive (i.e. in the skiing direction) forces are the main factors determining speed, especially in skating technique where skiers reach higher speeds in comparison to classic technique (Kvamme, Jakobsen, Hetland & Smith, 2005). V2 skating, also called G3 or double dance, is characterized by one symmetrical double pole push for each leg stroke and has become the main sub-technique during competitions due to its high adaptability from flat to moderate inclines.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Ski & Snowboard Masters Competition Guide
    Insurance isn’t one size fits all. At Liberty Mutual, we customize our policies to you, so you only pay for what you need. Home, auto and more, we’ll design the right policy, so you’re not left out in the cold. For more information, visit libertymutual.com. PROUD PARTNER Coverage provided and underwritten by Liberty Mutual Insurance and its affiliates, 175 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116 USA. ©2018 Liberty Mutual Insurance. 2019 ALPINE MASTERS COMPETITION GUIDE On The Cover Nancy Auseklis (IM - class 13) © Marshall Tate | Crystal Images bigskyphotos.com Editor Bill Skinner and Lauren Beckos Contributors Lisa Ballard Deb Lewis Carl Swanson Jack Ballard Horst Locher James Thoman Robert Cravens Bill McCollom Carol Tomassetti Ryan Fuller Nadine Price Ray Tulloch Meri Stratton Managing Editor and Layout Jeff Weinman Cover Design Jonathan McFarland | U.S. Ski & Snowboard Creative Services Published by U.S. Ski and Snowboard PO Box 100 | 1 Victory Lane Park City, UT 84060 usskiandsnowboard.org Copyright 2018 by the U.S. Ski & Snowboard. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the USA. Additional copies of this guide are available for $10.00 from Membership, 435.647.2666. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Key Contact Directory 4 1 U.S. Ski & Snowboard and the Masters Program 7 An Introduction to the Masters 8 What You Will Need to Compete 8 U.S. Ski & Snowboard and the Masters Program 9 Alpine Ski Racing Events 9 Where to Find More Information 10 Alpine Memberships 10 Code of Conduct 11 Athlete Safety 13 Insurance Coverage 14 Masters Contacts 15 2 Alpine Masters Champions 19 Alpine Masters National Championship Medalists 20 Division’s Cup 23 Al Sise/Ski Racing Recognition Awards 24 Spyder U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nordic Ski Touring by Gary Neptune
    r< .. :: , ; /Equipment, Wazjng, S/?J :Jvt.ountaineering, CJ3asic 7'ecfinUJ.ues rt(, Wfiere to go in Co[orado fi;;,~i .. , ·i.,) '::: {, . ' N ' Qi ~; D.· l ! C. Sl<J · 1 .· o, U.::IR~ l'.NG _:.. · ~ F !' , ..., I "!f " ·' .... , ·~ : . '-. '.'°!'1ii \ ::: . \ , \ ~tptune 6:33 S. BROADWAY I BOULDER, CO I TABLE MESA Sl-IOPPING CENTER I 303.499.8866 I Nl::PTUNl::MOUNTAINl::l::RING.COM FORWARD This booklet was prepared for customers and staff of Neptune Mountaineering in Boulder, Colorado and for the use of the Colorado Mountain Club. Many of the suggestiohs from the Colorado Mountain Club classes have been incorporated in this publication. I hope it will be a useful tool and an inspiration to everyone interested in skiing the Nor-way. Many thanks to everyone who helped with this publication, especially Jean Foster for her endless re-typing and Pete Birkeland for his suggestions and editing. · "'Gary Neptune © Gary Neptune, October 2012 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Forward......................................................................................... 2 Introduction ....... .. ..... .. .... ....... ... ... .. ... ....... .. ... .. ... .. ... ..... .. ... .. ...... ... 4 Equipment Skis ......, . ......................................................_ ........................... 5 Boots ...... .. .. ...... .. .. ...... .. ... ... ..... .. .. ... ... ..... .. ... ....... ... ... ... .. ... ... 9 Bindings ............................................................................... 10 Poles ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]