DOCSLIB.ORG

Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable Report SWRR Report SSuussttaaiinnaabbllee WWaatteerr RReessoouurrcceess RRoouunnddttaabbllee RReeppoorrtt MMaarrcchh 22001100 i SWRR Report Table of Contents Foreword………………………………………………………………………………………………ii Chapter 1: SWRR History 1 Authority ............................................................................................................................................1 Mission ...............................................................................................................................................1 Vision .................................................................................................................................................2 Primary Goals and Objectives ...........................................................................................................2 Chapter 2: Principles of Water Sustainability 3 Representing Sustainable Management with Systems Concepts and Indicators ...............................4 Developing the Indicator Framework ................................................................................................5 Chapter 3: Outreach Activities, Presentations, and Contributions 7 Roundtable Activities……………………………………………………………………………….7 The Energy and Water Nexus ..........................................................................................................13 Selected Abstracts by Roundtable Participants................................................................................23 Selected Abstracts by Water Resource Professionals ......................................................................24 Chapter 4: Applications and Case Studies 26 Chesapeake Bay: The Opportunity for Integrated Solutions………............................................... 26 Missouri River Basin: The Need for Sustainable Management.......................................................32 Sustainability in the Land of 10,000 Lakes………………………………………………………..40 Michigan Innovations in Water Management ..................................................................................48 Chapter 5: Highlights of National Initiatives on Sustainable Water Management 59 Recent Heinz Center Work on Water Indicators .............................................................................59 National Environmental Status and Trends .....................................................................................61 USGS National Water Census .........................................................................................................62 Water Environment Federation 2008 ...............................................................................................66 EPA Report on Environment, Water Chapter ..................................................................................66 Appendix A: Matrix of Candidate SWRR Criteria & Indicators 68 Appendix B: SWRR Letter to the National Environmental Status and Trends 86 Appendix C: Water Environment Federation Sustainability 2008, Green Practices for the Water Environment June 22-25, 2008, National Harbor, MD 90 Appendix D: Water Environment Federation WEFTEC.08 Annual Conference, Sustainable Water Resources Management, Technical Sessions, October 18-22, 2008, Chicago, Illinois 96 i SWRR Report Foreword The Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and information to promote better decision making regarding the sustainable management of our nation‘s water resources. SWRR was established as the fourth multi-stakeholder resource roundtable, bringing together a wide range of participants representing a diverse range of interests from academia, state and federal government, non-profit organizations, corporations, and regional partnerships. SWRR is a subgroup to the Advisory Committee on Water Information, a Federal Advisory Committee under Office of Management and Budget Memorandum 92-01. The roundtable encourages cross-sector collaboration and partnerships that foster greater understanding of our social, economic, and ecological systems. It supports development of sustainable management policies that contribute to the health and vitality of our economic, social, and environmental systems both now and in the future. This report outlines the formation of SWRR, provides insight into its mission and goals, and highlights activities in 2008 and 2009. We also hope it effectively communicates the roundtable‘s contributions to the field of water resources and suggests how the work of the roundtable can be applied to water resource sustainability topics and activities throughout the nation. This report consists of five main chapters. The first chapter provides an introduction to the history of SWRR and its relation to the other natural resource roundtables; the second discusses the roundtable‘s guiding principles and conceptual framework; the third provides a review of recent roundtable activities, and presentations and papers by SWRR participants and others who have contributed to the field of water resources. The fourth chapter provides case studies that apply principles of sustainable management. These case studies demonstrate the value of applying a sustainable approach to water management that is consistent with the mission, vision, and goals of the roundtable. Featured topics in this chapter include the innovative use of key indicators by citizens and stakeholders in the Chesapeake Bay region, Minnesota‘s and Michigan‘s efforts to develop frameworks for sustainable allocation of water, and opportunities to use a system of indicators and integrated stakeholder involvement in the Missouri River Basin. Chapter five provides insight into national initiatives on water resources and includes reports on the Council on Environmental Quality‘s National Environmental Status and Trends initiative, an interagency process led by the United States Forest Service; the United States Geological Survey National Water Census; The Heinz Center‘s work on ecosystem indicators; the Environmental Protection Agency Report on the Environment, water chapter, and collaborations between the ii SWRR Report roundtable and the Water Environment Federation. The roundtable anticipates that this report will be a resource for water resource managers, policymakers, and stakeholders who seek to inform policy decisions with principles of sustainable water management. In keeping with SWRR‘s focus to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and information, we look forward to enhancing dialogue and meaningful partnerships with organizations, institutions, government, and citizens alike. In 2010, SWRR will continue to be a forum for the exchange of information and ideas related to the sustainability of water resources. We have elected two new co-chairs, John Wells of the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board and Bob Wilkinson of the Bren School at UC Santa Barbara. The roundtable‘s 2010 meetings will take place in the San Francisco Bay area, the Midwest, and the Washington DC area. In 2010, the roundtable will work in support of: a) an ad hoc USGS working group to help design the national Water Census; b) efforts to build interest in and collaborate with the National Environmental Status and Trends project, which will establish a national set of environmental indicators; and c) the continuing national collaboration for a sustainable water resources future. In addition, we will continue efforts to further refine and populate the roundtable‘s framework of indicators for determining if the nation is managing its water resources on a sustainable basis. We welcome participation and input from all those with an interest in the sustainability of water resources. Finally, we recognize the efforts of all of those that have contributed to the work of SWRR over the years, and those that have contributed to this report. Special thanks to Douglas J. Wade, who proposed regular SWRR reports to the roundtable develop as a means to engage partners, and to this report‘s contributors, including Douglas, David Berry, Warren Flint, Rhonda Kranz, Robin O‘Malley, Ethan Smith, Alan Steinman, Stacy Tellinghuisen, John Wells, Harry Zhang, and the other SWRR participants and contributing organizations. Rick Swanson, US Forest Service Robert Goldstein, Electric Power Research Institute Co-Chairs Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable February 2010 Supporting Organizations University, Non-Profit, Companies & State Federal Alice Ferguson Foundation Advisory Committee on Water Information American Water Resources Association President‘s Council on Environmental Quality Annis Water Resources Institute U.S. Department of Agriculture California Department of Water Resources Natural Resources Conservation Service Ecological Society of America Forest Service Electric Power Research Institute U.S. Department of Commerce Five E‘s Unlimited National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Illinois State Water Survey U.S. Department of Energy Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments National Energy Technology Lab Minnesota Environmental Quality Board National Renewable Energy Lab Rural Community Assistance Partnership U.S. Department of the Interior Universities Council on Water Resources Bureau of Land Management University of California, Santa Barbara Bureau of Reclamation University of Illinois Fish and Wildlife Service University of Michigan, Ann Arbor U.S. Geological Survey Water Environment Federation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Western Pennsylvania Watershed Program iii SWRR Report Chapter 1: SWRR History The idea for a
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 11. Water Resources Element
    Humboldt County General Plan Planning Commission Approved Draft Chapter 11. Water Resources Element 11.1 Purpose This Element addresses water planning issues including river and stream water quality, stormwater runoff, groundwater management, water needs of fish and wildlife, water consumption, conservation and re-use methods, and state and federal regulations. 11.2 Relationship to Other Elements These and other water-related topics can be found throughout the General Plan. Water availability for development is addressed in the Land Use Element. The Conservation and Open Space elements address riparian corridors, wetlands, wildlife protection, fishery resources, other biotic resources, water-oriented recreation, and soil erosion. The Community Infrastructure and Services Element addresses public water and wastewater systems. 11.3 Background Surface and Groundwater Abundant water resources Large rivers and biologically rich watersheds are defining characteristics of Humboldt County. These resources provide local water supply, spawning habitat for fisheries, recreation opportunities, and local wealth for the fishing and tourism industries. The Eel, Trinity, and Klamath rivers extend well beyond county borders linking Humboldt to the complex regional, state, and interstate water resource and habitat management issues affecting their respective watersheds. The average annual runoff of the rivers running through the county reflects almost 30% of the state’s total runoff. Significant sections of these rivers and the Van Duzen River have been designated by the California legislature as wild, scenic, or recreational under the California Wild and Scenic River System. North Coast watersheds retain some of the last viable salmon and steelhead populations in the state and are a focal point for regional, state, federal, and tribal habitat recovery efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources Compared
    Water Resources Overview The goals of the Water Resources Chapter are listed below: - Protect the water supply from pollution and encroachment of developments. - Provide an adequate and safe drinking water supply to serve the existing and future residents of the City of Frederick. - Provide an adequate capacity of wastewater treatment with effluent meeting all necessary regulatory requirements for existing and future residents of the City. - Restore and protect water quality and contribute toward meeting the water qualityby striving to meet or exceed regulatory requirements. for water quality. This will require addressinginclude current water quality impacts as well as future impacts from land development and population growth. - Develop adequate stormwater management. - Protect the habitat value of the local and regional rivers and streams. - Efficiently use public dollars for infrastructure that ensures sustainable, safe, and adequate supply of water for all residents. The City is committed to ensuring water and wastewater (sewer) capacity for both existing and new developments andwhile minimizing the negative impacts of stormwater runoff. In 2002, the City established the Water and Sewer Allocation System to make certain that adequate treatment capacity for potable water and wastewater is in place for new growth prior to approval. In 2012, Ordinance G-12-13 was adopted which updated the allocation process and combined it with it the Impact Fees payable for water and sewer service. The City adopted an Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO) in 2007 that allows development to proceed only after it has been demonstrated that sufficient infrastructure exists or will be created in the water and wastewater systems.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Submitted to the Department of Environmental Sciences And
    A thesis submitted to the Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy of Central European University in part fulfilment of the Degree of Master of Science AN ANALYSIS ON SYNERGIC EFFORTS ON ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION TOWARDS ACHIEVING MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS IN NEPAL CEU eTD Collection arjun DHAKAL July, 2007 Budapest Notes on copyright and the ownership of intellectual property rights: (1) Copyright in text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies (by any process) either in full, or of extracts, may be made only in accordance with instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European University Library. Details may be obtained from the Librarian. This page must form part of any such copies made. Further copies (by any process) of copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the permission (in writing) of the Author. (2) The ownership of any intellectual property rights which may be described in this thesis is vested in the Central European University, subject to any prior agreement to the contrary, and may not be made available for use by third parties without the written permission of the University, which will prescribe the terms and conditions of any such agreement. (3) For bibliographic and reference purposes this thesis should be referred to as: Dhakal, A. 2007. An analysis on synergic efforts on environmental sustainability and poverty alleviation towards achieving Millennium Development Goals in Nepal. Master of Science thesis, Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Central European University, Budapest. Further information on the conditions under which disclosures and exploitation may take place is available from the Head of the Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Central European University.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Brief POLICY BRIEF February 2018
    TERI Policy Brief POLICY BRIEF FEBRUARY 2018 The Energy and Resources Institute Measures to Control Air Pollution in Urban Centres of India: Policy and Institutional framework Background and Objective Many Indian cities including New Delhi are included in the list of most polluted cities in the world (WHO 2014, Cheng et al. 2016). About 80 per cent of cities in India violate the prescribed standards of ambient air CONTENTS quality (CPCB 2014). Multiple sources contribute to the problem and, hence, sector-specific strategies are required for control of air quality. • Background and Objective 1 This policy brief aims to analyse the whole issue in terms of key drivers, • Drivers of Air Pollution 1 such as rapid urbanization, transportation, industrialization, power • Growth of Pollutant Emissions in generation, and agricultural activities, that subsequently lead to air India 2 pollution at different scales in India. These drivers lead to generation • Impacts of Air Pollution in India 2 of pressures on the air quality through release of pollutants. The brief • Urban Air Pollution Source assesses the contribution of different sources of emission and pollutant Apportionment Studies 4 concentrations at urban and national scales and the impact on human • Strategies for Control of Air health and other important receptors and discusses the key measures Pollution in Urban Centres 4 required for improvement of air quality in urban centres of India. • Conclusions 18 Drivers of Air Pollution Authors Urbanization, transportation, industrialization, power generation, and Sumit Sharma, Fellow agricultural activities are the key drivers that lead to air pollution through Jai Malik, Research Associate release of emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • RESEARCH EDITORIAL Advancing Water Resource Management in Agricultural, Rural, and Urbanizing Watersheds
    RESEARCH EDITORIAL ment of Engineering Professional Development doi:10.2489/jswc.68.4.337 at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Carl Evensen is a specialist in the De- partment of Natural Resources and Environmental Management at the University of Hawaii, Hono- lulu, Hawaii; Kitt Farrell-Poe is a water quality Advancing water resource management extension specialist and professor in the Agricul- tural and Biosystems Engineering Department at in agricultural, rural, and urbanizing the University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Cass Gardner is a professor at Florida A&M University, watersheds: Why land-grant Tallahassee, Florida; Wendy Graham is the Carl S. Swisher eminent scholar in Water Resources in the Department of Agricultural and Biological universities matter Engineering at the University of Florida and di- rector of the University of Florida Water Institute, A.J. Gold, D. Parker, R.M. Waskom, J. Dobrowolski, M. O’Neill, P.M. Groffman, K. Addy, M. Barber, Gainesville, Florida; Joe Harrison is an animal S. Batie, B. Benham, M. Bianchi, T. Blewett, C. Evensen, K. Farrell-Poe, C. Gardner, W. Graham, scientist and extension specialist at Washington J. Harrison, T. Harter, J. Kushner, R. Lowrance, J. Lund, R. Mahler, M. McClaran, M. McFarland, State University, Pullman, Washington; Thomas Copyright © 2013 Soil and Water Conservation Society. All rights reserved. D. Osmond, J. Pritchett, L. Prokopy, C. Rock, A. Shober, M. Silitonga, D. Swackhamer, J. Thurston, Harter is an extension groundwater hydrologist at Journal of Soil and Water Conservation D. Todey, R. Turco, G. Vellidis, and L. Wright Morton the University of California Davis, Davis, Califor- nia; Jennifer Kushner is an evaluation specialist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Federally funded university water pro- safety, agricultural water use, and groundwa- Wisconsin; Richard Lowrance is a research ecol- grams have had limited success in halting ter management.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on a National Water Policy
    UNIVERSITIES COUNCIL ON WATER RESOURCES WATER RESOURCES UPDATE, ISSUE 126, PAGES 6-11, NOVEMBER 2003 Perspectives on a National Water Policy Gerald E. Galloway Titan Corporation When the well’s dry, we know the worth of water. the above challenges and to discuss what could be -Benjamin Franklin- done to head off a looming crisis (AWRA, 2002). Poor Richard’s Almanac, 1746 The Setting oday, it is difficult to pick up a newspaper and not find a national or international story The Nation clearly faces water resources Tabout water. Droughts, floods, climate challenges. While there may be disagreements about change, navigation, water quality, riverine and the specific nature of the problems and their relative estuarine ecology are all in the headlines on a importance when weighed against other problems, frequent basis. Companion articles focus on the there was consensus on areas of concern. deteriorating infrastructure that supports these • Drought is a continuing problem across the systems. Scholars studying world water resources country. During the summer of 2002, 49 percent see water as a source of conflict and discord of the contiguous United States was in moderate throughout the world. A recent photo of farmers to extreme drought. Precipitation had been fighting with government officials to open the taps significantly below average in 27 states, and the for irrigation in the Klamath Valley, Oregon, months preceding the summers were the driest illustrates that such conflicts are not just overseas. on record in four southeastern states and two Yet, when one searches the Internet for a national Rocky Mountain States. Although 2003 offered water policy or vision statement that might in some some relief to the East, parts of the Southeast organized fashion inform government and public and Western United States have been in various action, nearly every citation deals with a country stages of drought since 1998 (NOAA, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • The National Water-Quality Assessment Program—Science to Policy and Management
    (version, June 30, 2010) The National Water-Quality Assessment Program—Science to Policy and Management In 1991, the U.S. Congress established the National Water-Quality NAWQA Science to Decision Making: Assessment (NAWQA) Program of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) • Sources and Transport of Contaminants in to develop long-term, nationally consistent information on the quality of Agricultural and Urban Areas – p. 11 the Nation’s streams and ground water, and thereby support scientifically • Vulnerability Assessments – p. 17 sound decisions for water-quality management, regulation, and policy decisions. The objectives of NAWQA are to assess the status and • Trends – p. 18 trends of national water-quality conditions and to understand the factors • Source Water Used for Drinking – p. 21 and processes that govern those conditions, thus, addressing the • Aquatic Ecosystem Health – p. 28 questions: • Linking Tributaries to Receiving Waters – p. 32 1. What is the quality of the Nation's streams and ground water? • Regulations, standards, guidelines, criteria – p. 33 2. How is water quality changing over time? • State assessments, source water protection, 3. How do natural factors and human activities affect the strategies, and fish consumption advisories – p. 37 quality of streams and ground water? • Monitoring Strategies and Sampling Protocols – p. 42 • Communicating Science to Policy – p. 45 NAWQA’s role in responding to national water-resource questions Our water resources are the basis for life and our economic vitality. These resources support a complex web of human activities and fishery and wildlife needs that depend upon clean water. Population growth and increasing demands for water, however, coupled with contamination from point and nonpoint sources, threaten the quality and quantity of our water resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics and the Modeling of Water Resources and Policies
    Economics and the Modeling of Water Resources and Policies James F. Booker, Richard E. Howitt, Ari M. Michelsen and Robert A. Young* * Respectively: Professor, Siena College; Professor, University of California, Davis; Professor, Texas A&M University; and Professor Emeritus, Colorado State University "This is a preprint of an article accepted for publication in the Natural Resource Modeling Journal 25th Anniversary Special Issue, (Volume 25, Issue 1) January 2012 Copyright 2012 Wiley-Blackwell" Contact Author: Ari M. Michelsen, [email protected] 915-859-9111 James F. Booker, Professor Economics Department, Siena College 515 Loudon Road Loudonville, NY 12211 Tel: 518-783-2929; email: [email protected] Richard E. Howitt, Professor Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics University of California, Davis 2120 Social Sciences and Humanities One Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616 Tel: 530-752-1521; e-mail: [email protected] Ari M. Michelsen, Professor Department of Agricultural Economics Texas AgriLife Research and Extension Center Texas A&M University System 1380 A&M Circle El Paso, TX 79927 Tel: 915-859-9111; e-mail: [email protected] Robert A. Young, Professor Emeritus Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Tel: 970-223-2206; e-mail: [email protected] NRMJ Economic Modeling Article page 0 of 42 7-29-2011 Abstract Over the last twenty-five years economic water policy models have evolved in concept, theoretical and technical methods, scope and application to address a host of water demand, supply, and management policy questions. There have been a number of theoretical and empirical advances over this period, particularly related to estimation of nonmarket, public good water-related values involving different methods of valuation.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Appendix
    Technical Appendix Managing California’s Water Insights from Interviews with Water Policy Experts Sarah Null, Eleanor Bartolomeo, Jay Lund, Ellen Hanak Contents Summary Introduction Long-Term Water Problems and Policy Actions Overcoming Obstacles Conclusions References List of Interview Respondents About the Authors Acknowledgments This paper is an online appendix to Managing California’s Water: From Conflict to Reconciliation, by Ellen Hanak, Jay Lund, Ariel Dinar, Brian Gray, Richard Howitt, Jeffrey Mount, Peter Moyle, and Barton “Buzz” Thompson, available at http://www.ppic.org/main/publication.asp?i=944. Supported with funding from S.D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation, The David and Lucile Packard Foundation, Pisces Foundation, Resources Legacy Fund, and Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Summary This paper synthesizes the results of interviews with more than 100 water policy experts from a range of sectors and regions within California, conducted in the spring and summer of 2010. Respondents were asked to provide open-ended answers to questions regarding California’s long-term water policy challenges and potential solutions. Top long-term policy problems cited include management of the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, unsustainable water supplies, lack of comprehensive groundwater management, threats to water supply and flood risk from climate change, and problems with the administration of the Endangered Species Act. In addition to a range of specific management solutions, respondents emphasized the importance of public education, strengthened leadership and reduced influence of special interests, development of a sustainable funding system, and more holistic resource management as solutions to California’s long-term water challenges. http://www.ppic.org/main/home.asp Technical Appendix Managing California’s Water: Insights from Interviews 2 Introduction As part of a project assessing the challenges and potential solutions to California’s water problems (Hanak et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing a National Approach to Water Background Paper Accompanying NCC Presentation for 5Th Annual National Water Conferen
    Implementing a National Approach to Water Reform Background Paper Presentation by Deborah Cope National Competition Council This paper accompanies the National Competition Council presentation at the 5th Annual National Water Conference. It provides more detailed background information on the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) water reforms and their place within National Competition Policy. The NCP Program Australia’s National Competition policy reform program, now in its sixth year, is designed to help develop a more dynamic, creative and competitive economy better able to serve the interests of the community. The program builds on pro- competitive reforms that commenced with the Trade Practices Act 1973, and focuses on monopoly arrangements. National Competition Policy (NCP) is part of an important ongoing process of review and reform. This continual process is necessary to ensure that laws, policies and industry structures in Australia continue to evolve in a way that enables businesses to respond flexibly to changing customer needs and new opportunities. The role of the NCP program in this ongoing process involves: · extending the reach of the anti-competitive conduct laws in Part IV of the Trade Practices Act to virtually all private and public sector businesses; · improving the performance of essential infrastructure by implementing nationally co-ordinated reform packages in: electricity: through the introduction of a fully competitive National Electricity Market by 1 July, 1999 which provides for consumer choice, third party
    [Show full text]
  • The Water Resources Protection Act and Its Impact on West Virginia Water Law
    Volume 107 Issue 3 Issue 3, Symposium: "A Look at Brown v. Board of Education in West Virginia: Article 12 Remembering the Past, Examining the Present, and Preparing for the Future" April 2005 The Water Resources Protection Act and Its Impact on West Virginia Water Law David M. Flannery Jackson Kelly PLLC Blair D. Gardner Jackson Kelly PLLC Jeffrey R. Vining Jackson Kelly PLLC Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr Part of the Water Law Commons Recommended Citation David M. Flannery, Blair D. Gardner & Jeffrey R. Vining, The Water Resources Protection Act and Its Impact on West Virginia Water Law, 107 W. Va. L. Rev. (2005). Available at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol107/iss3/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the WVU College of Law at The Research Repository @ WVU. It has been accepted for inclusion in West Virginia Law Review by an authorized editor of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Flannery et al.: The Water Resources Protection Act and Its Impact on West Virgini THE WATER RESOURCES PROTECTION ACT AND ITS IMPACT ON WEST VIRGINIA WATER LAW David M. Flannery* Blair D. Gardner Jeffrey R. Vining*** 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 750 II. WATER RESOURCES PROTECTION ACT ................................................. 753 A . Public Policy............................................................................ 753 B. Water WithdrawalSurvey ....................................................... 754 C. RegistrationProgram .............................................................. 757 D. Next Steps ................................................................................. 758 III. PROPERTY RIGHTS IN STREAMS AND WATER: THE COMMON LAW ORIGINS OF RIPARIAN RIGHTS ............................ 758 A. Scope of PropertyRights in Rivers & Streams ........................ 761 1. Virginia Land Grant ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Quality Commission-2012 to 2014 Work Plan
    AGENDA ITEM B-3 Environmental Quality Commission-2012 to 2014 Work Plan The Environmental Quality Commission is charged primarily with advising the City Council on matters Mission Statement involving environmental protection, improvement, and sustainability. Environmental Quality Commission 2012-2014 Name of Commission Cover Sheet Work Plan for 2012-2014 Commission Members Listing Commissioner Mitchel Slomiak (Chair) Commissioner Christina Smolke (Vice Chair) Commissioner Chris DeCardy Commissioner Kristin Kuntz-Duriseti Commissioner Adina Levin Commissioner Scott Marshall Commissioner Douglas Scott Environmental Quality Commission Priority List The Environmental Quality Commission has identified the following priorities to focus on during 2012 through 2014: 1. Analyze and recommend improvement on how the City’s planning process can be used to advance environmental sustainability 2. Assist in developing sustainable building policies and programs for private and public development projects 3. Maximize the urban canopy through programs and policies 4. Implement Climate Action Plan 5. Develop and evaluate resource conservation and pollution prevention programs and policies, such as solid waste reduction and water conservation and management policies, including gray water and groundwater management policies. Commission Work Plan Guidelines Work Plan Worksheet Step 1 Review purpose of The Environmental Quality Commission is charged primarily with advising the City Council on matters involving Commission as environmental protection, improvement,
    [Show full text]