1519038862M28translationand
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Cross-Talk Between Methylation and Phosphorylation in Lymphoid-Specific Helicase Drives Cancer Stem-Like Properties
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy www.nature.com/sigtrans ARTICLE OPEN The cross-talk between methylation and phosphorylation in lymphoid-specific helicase drives cancer stem-like properties Na Liu1,2,3, Rui Yang1,2, Ying Shi1,2, Ling Chen1,2, Yating Liu1,2, Zuli Wang1,2, Shouping Liu1,2, Lianlian Ouyang4, Haiyan Wang1,2, Weiwei Lai1,2, Chao Mao1,2, Min Wang1,2, Yan Cheng5, Shuang Liu4, Xiang Wang6, Hu Zhou7, Ya Cao1,2, Desheng Xiao1 and Yongguang Tao1,2,6 Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of proteins, including chromatin modifiers, play crucial roles in the dynamic alteration of various protein properties and functions including stem-cell properties. However, the roles of Lymphoid-specific helicase (LSH), a DNA methylation modifier, in modulating stem-like properties in cancer are still not clearly clarified. Therefore, exploring PTMs modulation of LSH activity will be of great significance to further understand the function and activity of LSH. Here, we demonstrate that LSH is capable to undergo PTMs, including methylation and phosphorylation. The arginine methyltransferase PRMT5 can methylate LSH at R309 residue, meanwhile, LSH could as well be phosphorylated by MAPK1 kinase at S503 residue. We further show that the accumulation of phosphorylation of LSH at S503 site exhibits downregulation of LSH methylation at R309 residue, which eventually promoting stem-like properties in lung cancer. Whereas, phosphorylation-deficient LSH S503A mutant promotes the accumulation of LSH methylation at R309 residue and attenuates stem-like properties, indicating the critical roles of LSH PTMs in modulating stem-like properties. Thus, our study highlights the importance of the crosstalk between LSH PTMs in determining its activity and function in lung cancer stem-cell maintenance. -
Control of Protein Function
3 Control of Protein Function In the cell, precise regulation of protein function is essential to avoid chaos. This chapter describes the most important molecular mechanisms by which protein function is regulated in cells. These range from control of a protein’s location and lifetime within the cell to the binding of regulatory molecules and covalent modifications such as phosphorylation that rapidly switch protein activity on or off. Also covered here are the nucleotide-driven switches in conformation that underlie the action of motor proteins and that regulate many signal transduction pathways. 3-0 Overview: Mechanisms of Regulation 3-1 Protein Interaction Domains 3-2 Regulation by Location 3-3 Control by pH and Redox Environment 3-4 Effector Ligands: Competitive Binding and Cooperativity 3-5 Effector Ligands: Conformational Change and Allostery 3-6 Protein Switches Based on Nucleotide Hydrolysis 3-7 GTPase Switches: Small Signaling G Proteins 3-8 GTPase Switches: Signal Relay by Heterotrimeric GTPases 3-9 GTPase Switches: Protein Synthesis 3-10 Motor Protein Switches 3-11 Regulation by Degradation 3-12 Control of Protein Function by Phosphorylation 3-13 Regulation of Signaling Protein Kinases: Activation Mechanism 3-14 Regulation of Signaling Protein Kinases: Cdk Activation 3-15 Two-Component Signaling Systems in Bacteria 3-16 Control by Proteolysis: Activation of Precursors 3-17 Protein Splicing: Autoproteolysis by Inteins 3-18 Glycosylation 3-19 Protein Targeting by Lipid Modifications 3-20 Methylation, N-acetylation, Sumoylation and Nitrosylation 3-0 Overview: Mechanisms of Regulation Protein function in living cells is precisely regulated A typical bacterial cell contains a total of about 250,000 protein molecules (comprising different amounts of each of several thousand different gene products), which are packed into a volume so small that it has been estimated that, on average, they are separated from one another by a distance that would contain only a few molecules of water. -
Casein Kinase 1 Isoforms in Degenerative Disorders
CASEIN KINASE 1 ISOFORMS IN DEGENERATIVE DISORDERS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Theresa Joseph Kannanayakal, M.Sc., M.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Jeff A. Kuret, Adviser Professor John D. Oberdick Professor Dale D. Vandre Adviser Professor Mike X. Zhu Biophysics Graduate Program ABSTRACT Casein Kinase 1 (CK1) enzyme is one of the largest family of Serine/Threonine protein kinases. CK1 has a wide distribution spanning many eukaryotic families. In cells, its kinase activity has been found in various sub-cellular compartments enabling it to phosphorylate many proteins involved in cellular maintenance and disease pathogenesis. Tau is one such substrate whose hyperphosphorylation results in degeneration of neurons in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). AD is a slow neuroprogessive disorder histopathologically characterized by Granulovacuolar degeneration bodies (GVBs) and intraneuronal accumulation of tau in Neurofibrillary Tangles (NFTs). The level of CK1 isoforms, CK1α, CK1δ and CK1ε has been shown to be elevated in AD. Previous studies of the correlation of CK1δ with lesions had demonstrated its importance in tau hyperphosphorylation. Hence we investigated distribution of CK1α and CK1ε with the lesions to understand if they would play role in tau hyperphosphorylation similar to CK1δ. The kinase results were also compared with lesion correlation studies of peptidyl cis/trans prolyl isomerase (Pin1) and caspase-3. Our results showed that among the enzymes investigated, CK1 isoforms have the greatest extent of colocalization with the lesions. We have also investigated the distribution of CK1α with different stages of NFTs that follow AD progression. -
Distinct Contributions of DNA Methylation and Histone Acetylation to the Genomic Occupancy of Transcription Factors
Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 8, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Research Distinct contributions of DNA methylation and histone acetylation to the genomic occupancy of transcription factors Martin Cusack,1 Hamish W. King,2 Paolo Spingardi,1 Benedikt M. Kessler,3 Robert J. Klose,2 and Skirmantas Kriaucionis1 1Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom; 2Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QU, United Kingdom; 3Target Discovery Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7FZ, United Kingdom Epigenetic modifications on chromatin play important roles in regulating gene expression. Although chromatin states are often governed by multilayered structure, how individual pathways contribute to gene expression remains poorly under- stood. For example, DNA methylation is known to regulate transcription factor binding but also to recruit methyl-CpG binding proteins that affect chromatin structure through the activity of histone deacetylase complexes (HDACs). Both of these mechanisms can potentially affect gene expression, but the importance of each, and whether these activities are inte- grated to achieve appropriate gene regulation, remains largely unknown. To address this important question, we measured gene expression, chromatin accessibility, and transcription factor occupancy in wild-type or DNA methylation-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells following HDAC inhibition. We observe widespread increases in chromatin accessibility at ret- rotransposons when HDACs are inhibited, and this is magnified when cells also lack DNA methylation. A subset of these elements has elevated binding of the YY1 and GABPA transcription factors and increased expression. The pronounced ad- ditive effect of HDAC inhibition in DNA methylation–deficient cells demonstrates that DNA methylation and histone deacetylation act largely independently to suppress transcription factor binding and gene expression. -
MP Kinase (Phosphoprotein) Assay
MSD® MAP Kinase Phosphoprotein Assay: Whole Cell Lysate Kit For quantitative determination of phosphorylated p38(Thr180/Tyr182), ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204; Thr185/Tyr187), and JNK (Thr183/Tyr185) in human, mouse, and rat whole cell lysate samples Alzheimer’s Disease Angiogenesis BioProcess Cardiac 1. Phospho-p38 Cell Signaling 2. BSA blocked Clinical Immunology 3. Phospho-JNK Cytokines 4. Phospho-ERK1/2 Growth Factors Hypoxia Immunogenicity Inflammation Metabolic MAP (Mitogen-Activated Protein) kinases are a family of evolutionarily conserved eukaryotic serine/threonine protein kinases which link Oncology receptors on the cell surface to important intracellular regulatory targets. MAP kinases also elicit an intracellular effect in response to physical and Toxicology chemical cellular stress. MAP kinase cascades within the cell are composed of a series of proteins, the first of which is a MAP kinase kinase kinase Vascular (MAPKKK).1 The MAPKKK is activated by phosphorylation in response to growth factors, mitogens, inflammatory cytokines, G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) or stress. The MAPKKK in turn phosphorylates MAPKK, which then phosphorylates MAPK.2 The activated terminal MAPK translocates into the nucleus, thereby exerting an effect on gene transcription. Through these pathways, the cell regulates responses leading to cell Catalog Numbers proliferation and differentiation, development, inflammation, and cell survival or apoptosis.2 ERK1/2, p38, and JNK are all MAP kinases, activated by the MAPK kinases MEK1/2, MKK3/6, and MKK4/7, respectively.2 Because these pathways are critical for the regulation of cell growth and survival, MAP Kinase 3 Phosphoprotein Assay: the MAP kinase family of enzymes offers desirable targets for the development of anti-cancer therapeutics. -
Small Nucleolar Rnas Determine Resistance to Doxorubicin in Human Osteosarcoma
International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Small Nucleolar RNAs Determine Resistance to Doxorubicin in Human Osteosarcoma Martina Godel 1, Deborah Morena 1, Preeta Ananthanarayanan 1, Ilaria Buondonno 1, Giulio Ferrero 2,3 , Claudia M. Hattinger 4, Federica Di Nicolantonio 1,5 , Massimo Serra 4 , 1 2 1, , 1, , Riccardo Taulli , Francesca Cordero , Chiara Riganti * y and Joanna Kopecka * y 1 Department of Oncology, University of Torino, 1026 Torino, Italy; [email protected] (M.G.); [email protected] (D.M.); [email protected] (P.A.); [email protected] (I.B.); [email protected] (F.D.N.); [email protected] (R.T.) 2 Department of Computer Science, University of Torino, 10149 Torino, Italy; [email protected] (G.F.); [email protected] (F.C.) 3 Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, 10043 Orbassano, Italy 4 Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, Pharmacogenomics and Pharmacogenetics Research Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy; [email protected] (C.M.H.); [email protected] (M.S.) 5 Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO–IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] (C.R.); [email protected] (J.K.); Tel.: +39-0116705857 (C.R.); +39-0116705849 (J.K.) These authors equally contributed to this work. y Received: 31 May 2020; Accepted: 21 June 2020; Published: 24 June 2020 Abstract: Doxorubicin (Dox) is one of the most important first-line drugs used in osteosarcoma therapy. Multiple and not fully clarified mechanisms, however, determine resistance to Dox. With the aim of identifying new markers associated with Dox-resistance, we found a global up-regulation of small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) in human Dox-resistant osteosarcoma cells. -
Ubiquitination/Deubiquitination and Acetylation/Deacetylation
Acta Pharmacologica Sinica (2011) 32: 139–140 npg © 2011 CPS and SIMM All rights reserved 1671-4083/11 $32.00 www.nature.com/aps Research Highlight Ubiquitination/deubiquitination and acetylation/ deacetylation: Making DNMT1 stability more coordinated Qi HONG, Zhi-ming SHAO* Acta Pharmacologica Sinica (2011) 32: 139–140; doi: 10.1038/aps.2011.3 n mammals, DNA methylation plays important role in human cancers[7, 8]. abundance of DNMT1 mutant lacking Ia crucial role in the regulation of Ubiquitinproteasome pathway is sig the HAUSP interaction domain, but not gene expression, telomere length, cell nificant in the stability of DNMT1[8], but the fulllength protein. These results differentiation, X chromosome inactiva ubiquitinmediated protein degradation show the coordination between ubiquit tion, genomic imprinting and tumori can be enhanced or attenuated by some ination of DNMT1 by UHRF1 and deu genesis[1]. DNA methylation patterns modifications like acetylation/deacety biquitination by HAUSP. Furthermore, are established de novo by DNA meth lation, protein methylation/demethyla they found that knockdown of HDAC1 yltransferases (DNMTs) 3a and 3b, tion, phosphorylation and Snitrosy increased DNMT1 acetylation, and whereas DNMT1 maintains the parent lation[9–11]. Estève et al demonstrated reduced DNMT1 abundance. Addition specific methylation from parental cells that SET7mediated lysine methy lation ally, acetyltransferase Tip60 which was to their progeny[2]. After DNA replica of DNMT1 decreased DNMT1 level found to acetylate DNMT1 promoted its tion, the new DNA strand is unmethy by ubiquitinmediated degradation[10]. ubiquitination, then destabilized it. At lated. Thus with the mother methylated Furthermore, an early study[12] showed last, Tip60 and HAUSP were found to strand, the DNA is hemimethylated. -
Protein Targeting Or Protein Sorting
Protein targeting or Protein sorting Refer Page 1068 to 1074 Principles of Biochemistry by Lehninger & Page 663 Baltimore Mol Cell Biology • Protein targeting or Protein sorting is the process of delivery of newly synthesized proteins to their proper cellular destinations • Proteins are sorted to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), mitochondria, chloroplasts, lysosomes, peroxisomes, and the nucleus by different mechanisms • The process can occur either during protein synthesis or soon after synthesis of proteins by translation at the ribosome. • Most of the integral membrane proteins, secretory proteins and lysosomal proteins are sorted to ER lumen from where these proteins are modified for further sorting • For membrane proteins, targeting leads to insertion of the protein into the lipid bilayer • For secretory/water-soluble proteins, targeting leads to translocation of the entire protein across the membrane into the aqueous interior of the organelle. • Protein destined for cytosol simply remain where they are synthesized • Mitochondrial and chloroplast proteins are first completely synthesized and released from ribosomes. These are then bound by cytosolic chaperone proteins and delivered to receptor on target organelle. • Nuclear proteins such as DNA and RNA polymerases, histones, topoisomerases and proteins that regulate gene expression contain Nuclear localization signal (NLS) which is not removed after the protein is translocated. Unlike ER localization signal sequence which is at N terminal, NLS ca be located almost anywhere along the -
Transcriptional Regulation by Histone Ubiquitination and Deubiquitination
Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 30, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press PERSPECTIVE Transcriptional regulation by histone ubiquitination and deubiquitination Yi Zhang1 Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA Ubiquitin (Ub) is a 76-amino acid protein that is ubiqui- The fact that histone ubiquitination occurs in the largely tously distributed and highly conserved throughout eu- monoubiquitinated form and is not linked to degrada- karyotic organisms. Whereas the extreme C-terminal tion, in combination with the lack of information regard- four amino acids are in a random coil, its N-terminal 72 ing the responsible enzymes, prevented us from under- amino acids have a tightly folded globular structure (Vi- standing the functional significance of this modification. jay-Kumar et al. 1987; Fig. 1A). Since its discovery ∼28 Recent identification of the E2 and E3 proteins involved years ago (Goldknopf et al. 1975), a variety of cellular in H2B ubiquitination (Robzyk et al. 2000; Hwang et al. processes including protein degradation, stress response, 2003; Wood et al. 2003a) and the discovery of cross-talk cell-cycle regulation, protein trafficking, endocytosis sig- between histone methylation and ubiquitination (Dover naling, and transcriptional regulation have been linked et al. 2002; Sun and Allis 2002) have set the stage for to this molecule (Pickart 2001). Ubiquitylation is pro- functional analysis of histone ubiquitination. In a timely posed to serve as a signaling module, and the informa- paper published in the previous issue of Genes & Devel- tion transmitted by this tag may depend on the nature of opment, Shelley Berger and colleagues (Henry et al. -
Phosphorylation of Protein 4.1 on Tyrosine-418 Modulates Its Function
Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 88, pp. 5222-5226, June 1991 Biochemistry Phosphorylation of protein 4.1 on tyrosine-418 modulates its function in vitro (epidermal growth factor receptor/spectrin/actin assembly) GOSUKONDA SUBRAHMANYAM*, PAUL J. BERTICStt, AND RICHARD A. ANDERSON**§ Department of *Pharmacology and tPhysiological Chemistry, and the tCell and Molecular Biology Program, University of Wisconsin Medical School, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706 Communicated by Vincent T. Marchesi, March IS, 1991 ABSTRACT Protein 4.1 was initially characterized as a actin/protein 4.1 complex (12). However, phosphorylation of protein that regulates cytoskeletal assembly in erythrocytes. protein 4.1 by protein kinase C also reduces protein 4.1 However, recent studies have shown that protein 4.1 is ubiq- binding to band 3 but not to glycophorin, while phosphory- uitous in mammalian cells. Here, we show that protein 4.1 is lation by cAMP-dependent kinase does not affect membrane phosphorylated on tyrosine by the epidermal growth factor interactions (12). These results suggest that protein 4.1 is receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase. The phosphorylation site has phosphorylated at multiple sites by different protein kinases, been localized to the 8-kDa domain, which has one tyrosine, and each phosphorylation event selectively modulates pro- tyrosine-418. The 8-kDa region is required for the assembly of tein 4.1 function. The phosphorylation sites by cAMP- the spectrin/actin complex, and phosphorylation by EGFR dependent protein kinase and protein kinase C are in the reduced the ability ofprotein 4.1 to promote the assembly ofthe 8-kDa and 16-kDa domains (10). -
The Structure and Mechanism of Phosphoprotein Phosphatases Many Phosphatases Require Two Metal Ions for Catalysis
WILLIAM P TAYLOR AND THEODORE S WIDLANSKI MINIREVIEW Charged with meaning: the structure and mechanism of phosphoprotein phosphatases Many phosphatases require two metal ions for catalysis. New structural information on two serinekhreonine phosphatases offers insight into how the metals contribute to catalysis. A comparison with the structures of protein tyrosine phosphatases, which do not use metal ions, shows that the only similarity at the active site is that of charge. Chemistry & Biology November 1995, 2:713-718 Many biological processes are regulated by J simple substrates; and (3) small-molecule specific - enzymes chcniical event - the cleavage or formation of phos- that hydrolyze one (or a group of structurally similar) phdte esters. In nature, these reactions are catalyzed by substrate(s), for example, phosphoinocitol nlonophos- tv,m sets of enzynws, phosphatases and kinnses. Kinases phatasc (this cnzyrne may be the clinical target of operate in the synthetic direction (phocphorylation) lithium ion therapy for depression [A]). while phosphatases catalyze the hydrolysis (cleavage) reaction. Over the last decade there has been a growing A second useful classification scheme is our according rcalizCition that phosphataws are extremely important in to the enzyme’s mechanism of action. Some phos- ccllulx and organismal functions [ 1 1. Here, we focus on phatascs use an active site nucleophile 3s the initi,J recent Ed\-antes in our understanding of phosphatases. phosphoryl group acceptor; others transfer it inuned- especially phosphoprotein phosphatases, with J vielv to atcly to water (Fig. 3). The first group cm be further clarifyiiig some of the mrchanictic and structural con- subdivided according to the phosphoryl group acceptor plcsitie and mlbiguities presented by this diverse group (cysteine. -
The Role of Casein Kinase 1 in Meiosis
e & Ch m rom ro o d s n o y m S Zhao and Liang, J Down Syndr Chr Abnorm 2016, 2:1 e n A Journal of Down Syndrome & w b o n DOI: 10.4172/2472-1115.1000106 D o f r m o l ISSN: 2472-1115a a l i n t r i e u s o J Chromosome Abnormalities Review Article Open Access The Role of Casein Kinase 1 in Meiosis Yue-Fang Zhao and Cheng-Guang Liang* The Key Laboratory of National Education Ministry for Mammalian Reproductive Biology and Biotechnology, The Research Center for Laboratory Animal Science, College of Life Science, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, People’s Republic of China Abstract The casein kinase 1 (CK1) belongs to the serine/threonine protein kinases. CK1 members, which commonly exist in all eukaryotes, are involved in the regulation of many cellular processes linked to cell cycle progression, spindle- dynamics, and chromosome segregation. Additionally, CK1 regulate key signaling pathways such as Wnt (Wingless/ Int-1), Hh (Hedgehog), and Hippo, known to be critically involved in tumor progression. Considering the importance of CK1 for accurate cell division and regulation of tumor suppressor functions, it is not surprising scientific effort has enormously increased. In mammals, CK1 regulate the transition from interphase to metaphase in mitosis. In budding yeast and fission yeast, CK1 phosphorylate Rec8 subunits of cohesin complex and regulate chromosome segregation in meiosis. During meiosis, two rounds of chromosome segregation after a single round of DNA replication produce haploid gametes from diploid precursors. Any mistake in chromosome segregation may result in aneuploidy, which in meiosis are one of the main causes of infertility, abortion and many genetic diseases in humans.