Cortaderia Selloana

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cortaderia Selloana Cortaderia selloana (Pampas grass, Silver pampas grass, Uruguayan Answer Score pampas grass) 1.01 Is the species highly domesticated? n 0 1.02 Has the species become naturalised where grown? 1.03 Does the species have weedy races? 2.01 Species suited to FL climates (USDA hardiness zones; 0-low, 1-intermediate, 2- 2 high) 2.02 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) 2 2.03 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y 1 2.04 Native or naturalized in regions with an average of 11-60 inches of annual y 1 precipitation 2.05 Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural y range? 3.01 Naturalized beyond native range y 2 3.02 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed y 2 3.03 Weed of agriculture y 4 3.04 Environmental weed y 4 3.05 Congeneric weed y 2 4.01 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y 1 4.02 Allelopathic n 0 4.03 Parasitic n 0 4.04 Unpalatable to grazing animals n -1 4.05 Toxic to animals n 0 4.06 Host for recognised pests and pathogens n 0 4.07 Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans y 1 4.08 Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems y 1 4.09 Is a shade tolerant plant at some stage of its life cycle y 1 4.10 Grows on infertile soils (oligotrophic, limerock, or excessively draining soils). n 0 North & Central Zones: infertile soils; South Zone: shallow limerock or Histisols. 4.11 Climbing or smothering growth habit y 1 4.12 Forms dense thickets y 1 5.01 Aquatic n 0 5.02 Grass y 1 5.03 Nitrogen fixing woody plant n 0 5.04 Geophyte n 0 6.01 Evidence of substantial reproductive failure in native habitat n 0 6.02 Produces viable seed y 1 6.03 Hybridizes naturally ? 6.04 Self-compatible or apomictic n -1 6.05 Requires specialist pollinators n 0 6.06 Reproduction by vegetative propagation y 1 6.07 Minimum generative time (years) 2 0 7.01 Propagules likely to be dispersed unintentionally (plants growing in heavily y 1 trafficked areas) 7.02 Propagules dispersed intentionally by people y 1 7.03 Propagules likely to disperse as a produce contaminant y 1 7.04 Propagules adapted to wind dispersal y 1 7.05 Propagules water dispersed y 1 7.06 Propagules bird dispersed n -1 7.07 Propagules dispersed by other animals (externally) y 1 7.08 Propagules dispersed by other animals (internally) n -1 8.01 Prolific seed production y 1 8.02 Evidence that a persistent propagule bank is formed (>1 yr) n -1 8.03 Well controlled by herbicides y -1 8.04 Tolerates, or benefits from, mutilation or cultivation y 1 8.05 Effective natural enemies present in U.S. Total Score 27 Implemented Pacific Second Screening No Risk Assessment Results Reject Reference Source data 1.01 Cultivated, but no evidence of selection for reduced weediness. 1.02 Skip to 2.01 1.03 Skip to 2.01 2.01 1. PERAL NAPPFAST Global Plant Hardiness 1. Global plant hardiness zones 9-11. 2. Distributional (http://www.nappfast.org/plant_hardiness/NAPPFAST%20 range: Native: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay, Uruguay. Global%20zones/10- 3. Native range: South America. 4. Origin: S America (Brazil, year%20climate/PLANT_HARDINESS_10YR%20lgnd.tif). (25 Argentina & Chile). 5. Geographic Distribution: Southen November 2008) 2. USDA, ARS, National Genetic Resources America: Tropical Caribbean, Chile, Argentina. 6. Native Program. Germplasm Resources Information Network - habitat - South America. (GRIN) [Online Database]. National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland. URL: http://www.ars- grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxgenform.pl?language=en. (25 November 2008). 3. Pacific Island Ecosystem at Risk (PIER) URL: http://www.hear.org/pier/species/cortaderia_selloana.htm . (25 November 2008). 4. Henderson, L (2001) Alien Weeds and Invasive Plants; p.12 5. Weber, E (2003) Invasive Plant Species of the World; p.120. 6. Dehgan, B (1998) Landscape Plants for Subtropical Climates; p. 189. 2.02 Native range is well known; refer to source data from 2.01. 2.03 1. Köppen-Geiger climate map (http://www.hydrol-earth- 1. Distribution in the native and cultivated ranges is syst-sci.net/11/1633/2007/hess-11-1633-2007.pdf). 2. widespread and occurs in more than 3 climatic groups. 2. USDA, ARS, National Genetic Resources Program. Distributional range: Native: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Germplasm Resources Information Network - (GRIN) Paraguay, Uruguay. 3. Native range: South America. 4. [Online Database]. National Germplasm Resources Origin: S America (Brazil, Argentina & Chile). 5. Geographic Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland. URL: http://www.ars- Distribution: Southen America: Tropical Caribbean, Chile, grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxgenform.pl?language=en. Argentina. 6. Hardiness zone - Zone 5, grows in all regions (25 November 2008). 3. Pacific Island Ecosystem at Risk of Florida. 7. Can tolerate winter frost; it also tolerates (PIER) URL: warmer summer temperatures, more intense sunlight, and http://www.hear.org/pier/species/cortaderia_selloana.htm moderate drought. 8. Most Cortaderia spp. tolerate short- . (25 November 2008). 4. Henderson, L (2001) Alien Weeds lived frosts -7°C/20°F, C. selloana occasional lows to - and Invasive Plants; p.12 5. Weber, E (2003) Invasive Plant 15°C/5°F, where winters are not excessively wet. Species of the World; p.120. 6. Dehgan, B (1998) Landscape Plants for Subtropical Climates; p. 189. 7. California Invasive Plant Council (Accessed 12/04/08) http://www.cal- ipc.org/ip/management/ipcw/pages/detailreport.cfm@user number=35&surveynumber=182.php. 8. Huxley, A. & Griffiths, M. (1992) The New Royal Horticultural Society Dictionary of Gardening. 2.04 1. Csurhes, S. & Edwards, R. (1998) Potential environmental 1. Has naturalized in several vegetation communities weeds in Australia: Candidate species for preventative including riparian areas, wetlands… 2. It prefers moist control. Canberra, Australia. Biodiversity Group, areas. 3. Invades: riverbanks, seasonally wet habitats. Environment Australia; Swarbrick, J.R. and D.B. Skarratt (1994) The Bushweed 2 Data Base of Environmental Weeds in Australia. The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia 2. Csurhes, S. & Edwards, R. (1998) Potential environmental weeds in Australia: Candidate species for preventative control. Canberra, Australia. Biodiversity Group, Environment Australia; Harradine, A (1991) The impact of pampas grass as weeds in southern Australia. Plant Protection Quarterly. 6: 111-115. 3. Henderson, L. (2001) Alien Weeds and Invasive Plants: a complete guide to declared weeds and invaders in South Africa, including another 36 species invasive in that region. 2.05 1. May, M et al (2003) Practical Guidebook for the 1. Has been used to control erosion in serpentine soils. 2. Identification and Control of Invasive Aquatic and Wetland Flowers used in dry arrangements; pampas grass plumes Plants in the San Francisco Bay-Delta Region, p.42-45; are grown commercially for this purpose in California, Danielsen et al. (2003) Vegetation Management Almanac where it has become a weed. 3. Much of the coastal for the East Bay Hills. 2. Dehgan, B. (1998) Landscape habitat appears to be saturated with infestations, but the Plants for Subtropical Climates. 3. California Invasive Plant total acreage in the state (CA) is probably still increasing. Council (Accessed 12/04/08) http://www.cal- Also colonizing naturally occuring landslides. Also invading ipc.org/ip/inventory/PAF/Cortaderia%20selloana.pdf. 4. Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. 4. Considerer Stopping the Silent Invasion (Accessed 12/04/08) very invasive and is on the Hawaii State Noxious Weed List. http://www.hawaiiinvasivespecies.org/pests/pampasgrass. Designated as one of Hawaii's Most Invasive Horticultural html. 5. ISSG Database (Accesses 11/12/2008) Plants. Serious pests in California and New Zealand. 5. http://www.issg.org/database/welcome/. Ideal for barrier and windbreak plantings. 3.01 1. Weber, E (2003) Invasive Plant Species of the World. 2. 1. Geographic distribution: Invasive in natural areas and not Howell, C and NZ Plant Conservation Network (2005) NZ native in Australia, New Zealand, western USA, and adventive vascular plant list. 3. May, M et al (2003) southern Europe; Introduced (e.g. not native to the area Practical Guidebook for the Identification and Control of but not invasive in natural areas, soley a weed of Invasive Aquatic and Wetland Plants in the San Francisco agrosystems, status as beign invasive, or unknown) in Bay-Delta Region; p.42-45. British Isles, southern Africa, and the Atlantic Islands of Canary and Madeira. 2. Fully naturalized. 3. ...now found all over Bay and Delta region in disturbed sites and broad variety of habitats. 3.02 1. California Invasive Plant Council (Accessed 12/04/08) 1. Often found in disturbed areas, including roadsides, http://www.cal- logged forests, and railroad tracks. 2. …in particular, ipc.org/ip/inventory/PAF/Cortaderia%20selloana.pdf. 2. disturbed areas associated with roads, pipeline cuts and ISSG Database (Accesses 11/12/2008) walking trails in forest areas and waste places. http://www.issg.org/database/welcome/. 3.03 1. Domenech, R. et al. (2006) Neighbourhood association of 1. Cortaderia selloana is invading abandoned agricultural Cortaderia selloana invasion, soil properties and plant lands close to coastal human settlements in Catalonia (NE community structure in Mediterranean coastal grasslands. Spain). ACTA Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology, 29(2); 171-177. 3.04 1. May, M et al (2003) Practical Guidebook for the 1. Can form dense stands that exclude other plants. Dense Identification and Control of Invasive Aquatic and Wetland colonies can be fire hazards. 2.a. The vigorous growth and Plants in the San Francisco Bay-Delta Region; p.42-45. 2. the large tussocks make it a strong competitor to Weber, E (2003) Invasisve Plant Species of the World, indigenous species.
Recommended publications
  • Pampas Grass and Jubata Grass
    PAMPAS GRASS AND JUBATA GRASS Cortaderia selloana Grass Family (Poaceae) Cortaderia jubata DESCRIPTION Pampas grass is a common name used masses. New seedlings often grow for both Cortaderia species. For clarity on the dead mass of the parent in this discussion, Cortaderia jubata plant, so what appears to be one will be called jubata grass,while pam- plant is often several generations, pas grass will refer only to C. selloana. growing one on top of the other.In Both species are rapid-growing contrast to jubata grass, pampas perennials that form large clumps. grass produces seeds only sexu- Jubata grass is found only in coastal ally, not apomictically, so both areas, but pampas grass also infests sexes of plants are necessary for more inland locales. Both are found in pollination and seed pro- disturbed areas, slopes and cliffs, duction. Both grasses PERENNIAL GRASSES coastal scrub, and forest clearings. can spread vegeta- Jubata grass leaves reach a height of tively from tillers or 5–7 feet at maturity. The dark green fragments of a leaves have sharply serrated margins.The mature plant that flowering stalks can tower up to 20 feet root in moist soil. above the mass of spreading leaves at the base. The inflorescence—a showy plume IMPACT ranging from pink to violet, turning Pampas grass is the more widespread creamy white or golden in maturity— species statewide, but jubata grass is con- typically appears from July to September. sidered more invasive in coastal areas. In Pampas grass leaves are gray-green forest gaps, both species can prevent the and narrower than those of jubata grass.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL REPORT PSRA Vegetation Monitoring 2005-2006 PC P502173
    Rare Plants and Their Locations at Picayune Strand Restoration Area: Task 4a FINAL REPORT PSRA Vegetation Monitoring 2005-2006 PC P502173 Steven W. Woodmansee and Michael J. Barry [email protected] December 20, 2006 Submitted by The Institute for Regional Conservation 22601 S.W. 152 Avenue, Miami, Florida 33170 George D. Gann, Executive Director Submitted to Mike Duever, Ph.D. Senior Environmental Scientist South Florida Water Management District Fort Myers Service Center 2301 McGregor Blvd. Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Table of Contents Introduction 03 Methods 03 Results and Discussion 05 Acknowledgements 38 Citations 39 Tables: Table 1: Rare plants recorded in the vicinity of the Vegetation Monitoring Transects 05 Table 2: The Vascular Plants of Picayune Strand State Forest 24 Figures: Figure 1: Picayune Strand Restoration Area 04 Figure 2: PSRA Rare Plants: Florida Panther NWR East 13 Figure 3: PSRA Rare Plants: Florida Panther NWR West 14 Figure 4: PSRA Rare Plants: PSSF Northeast 15 Figure 5: PSRA Rare Plants: PSSF Northwest 16 Figure 6: PSRA Rare Plants: FSPSP West 17 Figure 7: PSRA Rare Plants: PSSF Southeast 18 Figure 8: PSRA Rare Plants: PSSF Southwest 19 Figure 9: PSRA Rare Plants: FSPSP East 20 Figure 10: PSRA Rare Plants: TTINWR 21 Cover Photo: Bulbous adder’s tongue (Ophioglossum crotalophoroides), a species newly recorded for Collier County, and ranked as Critically Imperiled in South Florida by The Institute for Regional Conservation taken by the primary author. 2 Introduction The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) plans on restoring the hydrology at Picayune Strand Restoration Area (PSRA) see Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cortaderia Selloana
    Cortaderia selloana COMMON NAME Pampas grass FAMILY Poaceae AUTHORITY Cortaderia selloana (Schult. et Schult.f.) Asch. et Graebn. FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Exotic STRUCTURAL CLASS Grasses NVS CODE CORSEL BRIEF DESCRIPTION Robust tussock with tall erect flowering stems bearing dense heads of white to pale pink flowers. HABITAT Terrestrial. A coastal and lowland plant found between sea level and 800 metres. Plant grows in sites of all levels of fertility from low to high. The plant grows in a wide variety of soils from pumice and coastal sands to Plimmerton. Jun 2006. Photographer: Jeremy heavy clay (Ford 1993). Coloniser of open ground (West, 1996). A plant Rolfe that occurs in low or disturbed forest (including plantations), wetlands, grasslands, scrub, cliffs, coastlines, islands, forest margins, riverbanks, shrubland, open areas, roadsides and sand dunes. The plant’s primary habitat is disturbed ground. FEATURES Large-clump-forming grass to 4 m+. Leaf base smooth or sparsely hairy, no white waxy surface (cf. toetoe - Austroderia - species). Leaves with conspicuous midrib which does not continue into leaf base, no secondary veins between midrib and leaf edge. Leaves bluish-green above, dark green below, snap across readily when folded and tugged (toetoe species have multiple ribs in the leaves, making the leaves difficult to snap across). Dead leaf bases spiral like wood shavings, which makes pampas grasses more flammable than toetoe species. Flower head erect, dense, fluffy, white-pinkish, fading to dirty white, (Jan)-Mar-Jun. SIMILAR TAXA Can be separated from native Austroderia (toetoe) by the prominent single midrib on the leaves (Austroderia species have several prominent veins.).
    [Show full text]
  • Cortaderia Jubata in (Source: Mandy Tu, the Nature Conservancy, Bugwood.Org)
    Weed Risk Assessment for Cortaderia United States jubata (Lemoine ex Carrière) Stapf Department of Agriculture (Poaceae) – Jubata grass Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service February 18, 2014 Version 1 Left: Invasion of a coastal habitat in California by Cortaderia jubata in (source: Mandy Tu, The Nature Conservancy, Bugwood.org). Right: Habit of C. jubata (source: John M. Randall, The Nature Conservancy, Bugwood.org). Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service United States Department of Agriculture 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Weed Risk Assessment for Cortaderia jubata Introduction Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) regulates noxious weeds under the authority of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000) and the Federal Seed Act (7 U.S.C. § 1581-1610, 1939). A noxious weed is defined as “any plant or plant product that can directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops (including nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry, or other interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural resources of the United States, the public health, or the environment” (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000). We use weed risk assessment (WRA)—specifically, the PPQ WRA model (Koop et al., 2012)—to evaluate the risk potential of plants, including those newly detected in the United States, those proposed for import, and those emerging as weeds elsewhere in the world. Because the PPQ WRA model is geographically and climatically neutral, it can be used to evaluate the baseline invasive/weed potential of any plant species for the entire United States or for any area within it.
    [Show full text]
  • Pampasgrass and Jubatagrass Threaten California Coastal Habitats WRIC Leaflet 99-1 01/1999 (Edited 01/2010)
    University of California WEED Research & Information Center Pampasgrass and Jubatagrass Threaten California Coastal Habitats WRIC Leaflet 99-1 01/1999 (edited 01/2010) Joseph M. DiTomaso1, Evelyn Healy1 Carl E. Bell2, Jennifer Drewitz1, and Alison Stanton1 1 UC Davis; 2 UCCE Imperial County Where do they come from? Pampasgrass (Cortaderia selloana) is native to Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay, where it grows in relatively damp soils along river margins. It was first introduced to Europe in the early 1800s by a Scottish horticulturist. In 1848, nurserymen introduced pampasgrass to Santa Barbara, California. Commercial production began in California in 1874, and by 1895 nurserymen near Santa Barbara were the primary producers of pampasgrass as ornamental plants. In 1946, the Soil Conservation Service throughout Ventura and Los Angeles counties planted pampasgrass to provide supplementary dryland forage and Jubatagrass infestation prevent erosion. along the coast Jubatagrass (Cortaderia jubata) is native to northern Argentina, and along the Andes of Bolivia, Peru, and Ecuador. It was first cultivated in France and Ireland from seed collected in Ecuador. It is not clear how or when it was introduced into California, but it may have come through France, via the horticultural trade. Both species are true grasses (members of the Poaceae). Jubatagrass plant in redwood forest What problems do they cause? Jubatagrass is the more widespread and aggressive species. It is often called pampasgrass because of the difficulty in distinguishing the two species. Once established, mature plants of both species are very competitive. Large infestations of pampasgrass and jubatagrass threaten California's coastal ecosystems by crowding out native species, particularly in sensitive coastal dune areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Pampagrassen
    Kijk op Exoten / December 2019 12 Pampagrassen Ruud Beringen (FLORON), Johan van Valkenburg (NVWA Wageningen, Nationaal Referentiecentrum Fyto) & Leni Duistermaat (Naturalis Biodiversity Center, sectie Botanie) In augustus 2019 is er aan de EU-Unielijst met verboden uitheemse soorten ook een 'pampagras' toegevoegd; en wel hoog pampagras. In Europa wordt vooral pampagras, vanwege de decoratieve witte pluimen, veel als sierplant aangeplant. Beide soorten zijn nauw verwant en kunnen makkelijk met elkaar worden verward. Hoog pampagras is voor zover bekend alleen recent in het Verenigd Koninkrijk als sierplant geteeld. Gezien de grote gelijkenis tussen pampagrassen en de verwarrende naamgeving is het niet uitgesloten dat er meer soorten in de handel zijn en kunnen verwilderen. Herkomst Zowel hoog pampagras (Cortaderia jubata) als pampagras (Cortaderia selloana) zijn afkomstig uit Zuid Amerika. Pampagras is afkomstig uit de gematigde klimaatzones van Chili, Argentinië, Brazilië en Uruguay waar het voorkomt tot op hoogten van 1.900 meter boven zeeniveau. Het oorspronkelijk verspreidingsgebied van hoog pampagras ligt dichter bij de evenaar en omvat de alpine- tot subalpine zone (2.800-3.400 meter boven zeeniveau) van het Andesgebergte in Noord-Argentinië, Ecuador, Bolivia en Peru. Verspreiding en invasiviteit Hoog pampagras en pampagras zijn vanwege hun decoratieve waarde geïntroduceerd in Noord-Amerika, Zuid-Afrika, Australië en Nieuw-Zeeland. In deze landen zijn beide soorten nu beruchte invasieve exoten. De planten kunnen zich met hun lichte zaden over grote afstanden verspreiden en éénmaal gevestigd, verdringen ze de oorspronkelijke vegetatie. De grote hoeveelheden geproduceerd dood organisch materiaal verhoogt de brandgevoeligheid van de vegetaties waarin ze groeien. Hoog pampagras (Cortaderia jubata) in Nieuw-Zeeland (habitus).
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Pampas Cortaderia Jubata
    Purple pampas Cortaderia jubata Family Poaceae (grass) Also known as Cutty grass, Prince-of-Wales’ feathers Where is it originally from? South America What does it look like? Large, clump-forming grass (<3 m+). Very hairy leaf base with no white waxy surface. Leaves have a wide conspicuous midrib which does not continue into leaf base, and there are no secondary veins between midrib and leaf edge. Both leaf surfaces are dark green, leaves snap readily when tugged, and dead leaf bases spiral like wood shavings. Dense, erect, fluffy, bright purple flowerheads (Jan-Mar) fade to a dirty brown at the end of the flowering season. Photo: Carolyn Lewis Are there any similar species? Cortaderia selloana and native Austroderia species (toetoe). Toetoe leaves don't snap readily, have distinct secondary parallel veins between midrib and edge, midrib continues into leaf base, and leaves have white waxy sheaths. Dead leaves don't spiral. Drooping light golden-yellow flowers are produced from September to January. Why is it weedy? Tolerates heat and frost, salt, wind, wet and drought, moderate shade, most soils, and low fertility. Recovers quickly after fire. Prolific seeder and seeds are widely dispersed. How does it spread? Seeds are spread long distances by wind and occasionally water. Also Photo: Carolyn Lewis spreads by soil movement, dumped vegetation, contaminated forestry machinery, clothing, animal pelts. Common seed sources are plantation forests, roadsides, farm hedges, quarries and wasteland. What damage does it do? Colonises sprayed, burnt, slipped or otherwise disturbed sites, quickly becomes very dense. Replaces groundcovers, shrubs, and ferns, creates fire hazard, provides a habitat for possums and rats, and impedes access.
    [Show full text]
  • Pampas Grass (Cortaderia Jubata & C
    Pampas grass (Cortaderia jubata & C. selloana) An Alien Plant Report Prepared by: Charles Chimera, Forest Starr, Kim Martz and Lloyd Loope United States Geological Survey Biological Resources Division In cooperation with: American Water Works Association Research Foundation Maui County Board of Water Supply March, 1999 Pampas Grass (Cortaderia jubata & C. selloana) What is Pampas grass? Why is it bad? Pampas grass is a giant tussock forming perennial grass with saw toothed leaves and white to pink flower plumes. Pampas grass seeds itself freely, dispersing long distances. Once established, it can crowd out native plants, damage grazing lands, and create a fire hazard. Pampas is a pest in California and New Zealand. On Maui, pampas grass is widely planted and has been found from Iao valley to Haleakala crater. It has the potential to invade pristine rain forest and alpine shrubland. What should you do if you see this plant? 1. Call the HEAR project at 572-4418, or the State Department of Agriculture at 873-3555. 2. Dig out the plant, if possible. Otherwise treat with an herbicide. 3. For more information or additional copies of this flyer, call 572-4418, 873-3555, or websurf to www.hear.org. Pampas grass infestation -- Kula, Maui You can help keep Maui no ka oi. United States Geological Survey Maui County American Water Works Association Biological Resources Division Board of Water Supply Research Foundation Pampas grass (Cortaderia jubata & C. selloana) 2 Pampas grass (Cortaderia jubata & C. selloana) Overview: Pampas grass is a giant tussock forming perennial grass with saw toothed leaves and white to pink flower plumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Tall-Statured Grasses: a Useful Functional Group for Invasion Science
    Biol Invasions https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1815-z (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV) REVIEW Tall-statured grasses: a useful functional group for invasion science Susan Canavan . Laura A. Meyerson . Jasmin G. Packer . Petr Pysˇek . Noe¨lie Maurel . Vanessa Lozano . David M. Richardson . Giuseppe Brundu . Kim Canavan . Angela Cicatelli . Jan Cˇ uda . Wayne Dawson . Franz Essl . Francesco Guarino . Wen-Yong Guo . Mark van Kleunen . Holger Kreft . Carla Lambertini . Jan Pergl . Hana Ska´lova´ . Robert J. Soreng . Vernon Visser . Maria S. Vorontsova . Patrick Weigelt . Marten Winter . John R. U. Wilson Received: 13 March 2018 / Accepted: 9 August 2018 Ó Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 Abstract Species in the grass family (Poaceae) have statured grasses (TSGs; defined as grass species that caused some of the most damaging invasions in natural maintain a self-supporting height of 2 m or greater) to ecosystems, but plants in this family are also among the non-TSGs using the Global Naturalised Alien Flora most widely used by humans. Therefore, it is important database. We review the competitive traits of TSGs and to be able to predict their likelihood of naturalisation and collate risk assessments conducted on TSGs. Of the c. impact. We explore whether plant height is of particular 11,000 grass species globally, 929 qualify (c. 8.6%) as importance in determining naturalisation success and TSGs. 80.6% of TSGs are woody bamboos, with the impact in Poaceae by comparing naturalisation of tall- remaining species scattered among 21 tribes in seven subfamilies. When all grass species were analysed, TSGs and non-TSGs did not differ significantly in the Electronic supplementary material The online version of probability of naturalisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomical Enablers and the Evolution of C4 Photosynthesis in Grasses
    Anatomical enablers and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis in grasses Pascal-Antoine Christina, Colin P. Osborneb, David S. Chateleta, J. Travis Columbusc, Guillaume Besnardd, Trevor R. Hodkinsone,f, Laura M. Garrisona, Maria S. Vorontsovag, and Erika J. Edwardsa,1 aDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912; bDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom; cRancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA 91711; dUnité Mixte de Recherche 5174, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Université Paul Sabatier-Ecole Nationale de Formation Agronomique, 31062 Toulouse Cedex 9, France; eSchool of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland; fTrinity Centre for Biodiversity Research, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland; and gHerbarium, Library, Art and Archives, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey TW9 3AE, United Kingdom Edited by Elizabeth A. Kellogg, University of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, and accepted by the Editorial Board November 27, 2012 (received for review September 27, 2012) C4 photosynthesis is a series of anatomical and biochemical mod- metabolic modules that are suitable for the C4 pathway and can ifications to the typical C3 pathway that increases the productivity be recruited for this function through relatively few mutations of plants in warm, sunny, and dry conditions. Despite its complex- (6, 7). In addition, the photorespiratory pump based on glycine ity, it evolved more than 62 times independently in flowering decarboxylase is a likely evolutionary stable intermediate phe- plants. However, C4 origins are absent from most plant lineages notype on the road from C3 to C4 (3, 8).
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In
    A PHYLOGENETIC STUDY OF DANTHONIA DC. (POACEAE) IN NORTH AMERICA A thesis submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada By Elizabeth Reimer © Elizabeth Reimer, February 2006 All rights reserved PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department of the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying, publication, or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or to make use of other material in this thesis in whole or in part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Biology University of Saskatchewan 112 Science Place Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5E2 i ABSTRACT The Danthonioideae (Poaceae) has been the focus of several systematic studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Weed Risk Assessment for Cortaderia Selloana
    Weed Risk Assessment for Cortaderia United States selloana (Schult. & Schult. f.) Asch. & Department of Graebn. (Poaceae) – Pampas grass Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service February 18, 2014 Version 1 Cortaderia selloana (source for left image: The Nature Conservancy Archive, The Nature Conservancy, Bugwood.org; source for right image: Joseph M. DiTomaso, University of California - Davis, Bugwood.org). Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service United States Department of Agriculture 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Weed Risk Assessment for Cortaderia selloana Introduction Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) regulates noxious weeds under the authority of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000) and the Federal Seed Act (7 U.S.C. § 1581-1610, 1939). A noxious weed is defined as “any plant or plant product that can directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops (including nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry, or other interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural resources of the United States, the public health, or the environment” (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000). We use weed risk assessment (WRA)— specifically, the PPQ WRA model (Koop et al., 2012)—to evaluate the risk potential of plants, including those newly detected in the United States, those proposed for import, and those emerging as weeds elsewhere in the world. Because the PPQ WRA model is geographically and climatically neutral, it can be used to evaluate the baseline invasive/weed potential of any plant species for the entire United States or for any area within it.
    [Show full text]