Poisons Standard February 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Poisons Standard February 2020 POISONS STANDARD FEBRUARY 2020 I, Avi Rebera, as delegate of the Secretary to the Department of Health, make the following Poisons Standard. Dated 23 December 2019 Avi Rebera Assistant Secretary Regulatory Engagement and Planning Branch Health Products Regulation Group Department of Health Authorised Version F2020L00017 registered 10/01/2020 1. Name This instrument is the Poisons Standard February 2020. 2. New Poisons Standard This instrument consists of the Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Medicines and Poisons No. 27 (the SUSMP 27), as set out in Schedule 2. 3. Commencement (1) Each provision of this instrument specified in column 1 of the table commences, or is taken to have commenced, in accordance with column 2 of the table. Any other statement in column 2 has effect according to its terms. Commencement information Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Provisions Commencement Date/Details 1. The whole of this 1 February 2020. 1 February 2020 instrument Note: This table relates only to the provisions of this instrument as originally made. It will not be amended to deal with any later amendments of this instrument. (2) Any information in column 3 of the table is not part of this instrument. Information may be inserted in this column, or information in it may be edited, in any published version of this instrument. 4. Authority This instrument is made under paragraph 52D(2)(b) of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989. 5. Repeals Each instrument that is specified in Schedule 1 to this instrument is repealed as set out in that Schedule. Authorised Version F2020L00017 registered 10/01/2020 Schedule 1—Repeals Note: See section 5. Poisons Standard December 2019 1 The whole of the instrument Repeal the instrument Authorised Version F2020L00017 registered 10/01/2020 Schedule 2-Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Medicines and Poisons No. 27 Poisons Standard February 2020 i Authorised Version F2020L00017 registered 10/01/2020 STANDARD FOR THE UNIFORM SCHEDULING OF MEDICINES AND POISONS No. 27 February 2020 Poisons Standard February 2020 ii Authorised Version F2020L00017 registered 10/01/2020 Reasons for scheduling delegates’ final decisions can be accessed from the TGA website, at https://www.tga.gov.au/reasons-scheduling-delegates-final-decisions Further inquiries in relation to this document should be directed to: The Secretary Chemicals and Medicines SchedulingSecretariat (MD122) Scheduling and Committee Governance Therapeutic Goods Administration PO Box 100 WODEN ACT 2606 or by email to [email protected] [email protected] Media Liaison Unit Australian Government Department of Health Poisons Standard February 2020 iii Authorised Version F2020L00017 registered 10/01/2020 Table of Contents Table of Contents iv INTRODUCTION vi PART 1 1 INTERPRETATION ______________________________________________ 1 PART 2 10 CONTROL ON MEDICINES AND POISONS _______________________ 10 SECTION ONE LABELS __________________________________________ 10 SECTION TWO CONTAINERS _____________________________________ 21 SECTION THREE STORAGE ______________________________________ 27 SECTION FOUR DISPOSAL _________________________________________ 27 SECTION FIVE RECORD KEEPING ________________________________ 27 SECTION SIX SALE, SUPPLY, POSSESSION, or USE __________________ 28 SECTION SEVEN/Appendix I PAINT OR TINTERS ____________________ 28 PART 3 31 MISCELLANEOUS REGULATIONS ______________________________ 31 SECTION ONE ADVERTISING ____________________________________ 31 SECTION TWO SALE OR SUPPLY _________________________________ 31 SECTION THREE STORAGE ______________________________________ 32 PART 4 33 THE SCHEDULES ______________________________________________ 33 SCHEDULE 1 _____________________________________________________ 33 SCHEDULE 2 _____________________________________________________ 33 SCHEDULE 3 _____________________________________________________ 50 SCHEDULE 4 _____________________________________________________ 57 SCHEDULE 5 ____________________________________________________ 147 SCHEDULE 6 ____________________________________________________ 179 SCHEDULE 7 ____________________________________________________ 231 Poisons Standard February 2020 iv Authorised Version F2020L00017 registered 10/01/2020 SCHEDULE 8 ____________________________________________________ 243 SCHEDULE 9 ____________________________________________________ 247 SCHEDULE 10 ___________________________________________________ 254 PART 5 260 THE APPENDICES _____________________________________________ 260 APPENDIX A – GENERAL EXEMPTIONS ____________________________ 260 APPENDIX B – SUBSTANCES CONSIDERED NOT TO REQUIRE CONTROL BY SCHEDULING ________________________________________________ 263 APPENDIX C (see SCHEDULE 10) __________________________________ 281 APPENDIX D – ADDITIONAL CONTROLS ON POSSESSION OR SUPPLY OF POISONS INCLUDED IN SCHEDULE 4 OR 8 _________________________ 282 APPENDIX E – FIRST AID INSTRUCTIONS FOR POISONS _____________ 288 APPENDIX F – WARNING STATEMENTS AND GENERAL SAFETY DIRECTIONS FOR POISONS _______________________________________ 313 APPENDIX G – DILUTE PREPARATIONS ____________________________ 349 APPENDIX H – SCHEDULE 3 POISONS PERMITTED TO BE ADVERTISED352 APPENDIX I _____________________________________________________ 355 APPENDIX J – SCHEDULE 7 POISONS REQUIRING ADDITIONAL CONTROLS ON AVAILABILITY AND USE __________________________ 356 APPENDIX K – DRUGS REQUIRED TO BE LABELLED WITH A SEDATION WARNING ______________________________________________________ 361 APPENDIX L – REQUIREMENTS FOR DISPENSING LABELS FOR HUMAN AND VETERINARY MEDICINES ___________________________________ 370 APPENDIX M – ADDITIONAL CONTROLS OR SUPPLY REQUIREMENTS FOR POISONS INCLUDED IN SCHEDULE 3 TO ALLOW THEM TO BE PROVIDED BY A PHARMACIST ___________________________________ 374 INDEX 375 Poisons Standard February 2020 v Authorised Version F2020L00017 registered 10/01/2020 INTRODUCTION The Poisons Standard February 2020, which, under section 2 above consists of the Standard for the Uniform Scheduling of Medicines and Poisons No.27 (the Standard, or the SUSMP), is made under paragraph 52D(2)(b) of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989, and is a compilation of decisions made under section 52D of the same Act. The SUSMP should be read in conjunction with the Scheduling Policy Framework (SPF) of the Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council. Further information on the scheduling amendments and the SPF can be accessed at www.tga.gov.au. Refer to Part 1, Interpretation, on page 2 below for definitions of specific terms used in this document including “medicine” and “poison” (noting that the definition of poison includes medicine). The SUSMP serves two key purposes. Firstly, the SUSMP contains the decisions of the Secretary of the Department of Health or the Secretary's delegates regarding the classification of poisons into Schedules, as recommendations to Australian States and Territories. The scheduling classification sets the level of control on the availability of poisons. The scheduling of poisons is implemented through relevant State and Territory legislation. Certain advertising, labelling and packaging requirements may also be a consequence of scheduling, but are the subject of other Commonwealth registration schemes. Secondly, the SUSMP includes provisions for labelling, containers, storage, disposal, record- keeping, sale, supply and possession of poisons in general which are intended to be adopted for use in each jurisdiction of Australia. Other government agencies may also impose controls on certain products. The requirements for labelling and containers in the SUSMP are intended to integrate with existing legislative instruments for labelling and containers. Advertising, labelling and packaging of therapeutic goods and agricultural and veterinary chemicals are also dealt with through the respective product registration schemes provided for in Commonwealth legislation. Poisons which are packed and sold solely for industrial, manufacturing, laboratory or dispensary use are exempt from all labelling requirements included in the SUSMP as they are covered by labelling requirements under applicable jurisdictional Work Health and Safety laws, as amended from time to time. Note, however that this exemption does not extend to controls on supply of these poisons. The SUSMP is presented with a view to promoting uniform: scheduling of poisons throughout Australia; signal headings on labels for poisons throughout Australia; labelling and packaging requirements for poisons throughout Australia; additional controls on the availability and use of poisons in Australia. The various Commonwealth Acts, legislative instruments and other documents which integrate with the SUSMP include: the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Act 1994 the Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Code Regulations 1995 Poisons Standard February 2020 vi Authorised Version F2020L00017 registered 10/01/2020 the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 the Therapeutic Goods Order No. 69 – General Requirements for Labels for Medicines 2017 the Therapeutic Goods Order No. 91 – Standard for labels of prescription and related medicines (Compilation No. 2) the Therapeutic Goods Order No. 92 – Standard for labels of non-prescription medicines (Compilation No. 1) the Therapeutic Goods Order No. 95 – Child-resistant packaging requirements for medicines 2017 the Therapeutic Goods (Medicines Advisory Statements) Specification 2019 – Schedule 1 Required Advisory Statements for
Recommended publications
  • July 2019 New Drugs
    July 2019 Learn more New drugs Drug name Therapeutic category Indication(s) Launch information Manufacturer(s) AirDuo® Digihaler™ Treatment of asthma in patients aged 12 years and older. AirDuo Digihaler should be used for patients not adequately (fluticasone Corticosteroid/ long-acting beta controlled on a long term asthma control medication such as TBD propionate/salmeterol) agonist (LABA) an inhaled corticosteroid or whose disease warrants initiation Teva of treatment with both an inhaled corticosteroid and LABA Accrufer® (ferric maltol) Iron replacement Treatment of iron deficiency in adults TBD Shield Therapeutics ® Anticoagulant in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary Angiomax RTU (bivalrudin) intervention, including patients with heparin-induced Direct thrombin inhibitor TBD MAIA Pharmaceuticals thrombocytopenia and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis syndrome Baqsimi™ (glucagon) Treatment of severe hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes nasal powder Glucagon analog July 28, 2019 ages 4 years and above Eli Lilly Cuvitru (immune globulin subcutaneous [human], 20% Replacement therapy for primary humoral immunodeficiency solution) 10 mg/50 mL Immunoglobulin July 2, 2019 subcutaneous injection in adult and pediatric patients two years of age and older Baxalta 1 RxHighlights July 2019 Drug name Therapeutic category Indication(s) Launch information Manufacturer(s) Drizalma Sprinkle™ (duloxetine) Treatment of major depressive disorder in adults; generalized Serotonin and norepinephrine anxiety disorder in adults and pediatric
    [Show full text]
  • NCAA [R] Drug-Testing Program, 1999-2000
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 436 990 HE 032 608 AUTHOR Halpin, Ty, Ed. TITLE NCAA[R] Drug-Testing Program, 1999-2000. INSTITUTION National Collegiate Athletic Association, Indianapolis, IN. PUB DATE 1999-00-00 NOTE 15p. AVAILABLE FROM National Collegiate Athletic Association, P.O. Box 6222, Indianapolis, IN 46206-6222. Tel: 317-917-6222. PUB TYPE Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (090) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Athletes; *College Athletics; Drug Abuse; *Drug Use Testing; Higher Education; Illegal Drug Use IDENTIFIERS *National Collegiate Athletic Association ABSTRACT The drug testing program supports NCAA's goal to protect the health and safety of student-athletes competing for their institutions, while reaffirming the organization's commitment to fair and equitable competition. Proposal Nos. 30 and 52-54 provide a program for the NCAA's members to ensure that no one athlete has a chemically-induced advantage or is pressured to use chemical substances. The program involves urine collection on specific occasions and laboratory analyses for substances on a list of banned drugs including stimulants, anabolic agents such as steroids, diuretics, illegal drugs, or peptide hormones. Consent forms must be signed by student athletes if they wish to participate in NCAA programs. (JM) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. 6' 3r; - RUG- ESTING ROGRAI4 1999-2000 , Pso (2 BEST COPY AVAILABLE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS CENTER (ERIC) BEEN GRANTED BY his document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 8,343,962 B2 Kisak Et Al
    US008343962B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 8,343,962 B2 Kisak et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Jan. 1, 2013 (54) TOPICAL FORMULATION (58) Field of Classi?cation Search ............. .. 514/226.5, 514/334, 420, 557, 567 (75) Inventors: Edward T. Kisak, San Diego, CA (US); See application ?le fOr Complete Search history. John M. NeWsam, La Jolla, CA (US); _ Dominic King-Smith, San Diego, CA (56) References C‘ted (US); Pankaj Karande, Troy, NY (US); Samir Mitragotri, Goleta, CA (US) US' PATENT DOCUMENTS 5,602,183 A 2/1997 Martin et al. (73) Assignee: NuvoResearchOntano (CA) Inc., Mississagua, 6,328,979 2B1 12/2001 Yamashita et a1. 7,001,592 B1 2/2006 Traynor et a1. ( * ) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 7,795,309 B2 9/2010 Kisak eta1~ patent is extended or adjusted under 35 2002/0064524 A1 5/2002 Cevc U.S.C. 154(b) by 212 days. FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS This patent is subject to a terminal dis- W0 WO 2005/009510 2/2005 claimer- OTHER PUBLICATIONS (21) APPI' NO‘, 12/848,792 International Search Report issued on Aug. 8, 2008 in application No. PCT/lB2007/0l983 (corresponding to US 7,795,309). _ Notice ofAlloWance issued on Apr. 29, 2010 by the Examiner in US. (22) Med Aug- 2’ 2010 Appl. No. 12/281,561 (US 7,795,309). _ _ _ Of?ce Action issued on Dec. 30, 2009 by the Examiner in US. Appl. (65) Prior Publication Data No, 12/281,561 (Us 7,795,309), Us 2011/0028460 A1 Feb‘ 3’ 2011 Primary Examiner * Raymond Henley, 111 Related U 5 Application Data (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm * Foley & Lardner LLP (63) Continuation-in-part of application No.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Fluralaner and Afoxolaner Treatments to Control Flea
    Dryden et al. Parasites & Vectors (2016) 9:365 DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1654-7 RESEARCH Open Access Evaluation of fluralaner and afoxolaner treatments to control flea populations, reduce pruritus and minimize dermatologic lesions in naturally infested dogs in private residences in west central Florida USA Michael W. Dryden1*, Michael S. Canfield2, Kimberly Kalosy1, Amber Smith1, Lisa Crevoiserat1, Jennifer C. McGrady1, Kaitlin M. Foley1, Kathryn Green2, Chantelle Tebaldi2, Vicki Smith1, Tashina Bennett1, Kathleen Heaney3, Lisa Math3, Christine Royal3 and Fangshi Sun3 Abstract Background: A study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two different oral flea and tick products to control flea infestations, reduce pruritus and minimize dermatologic lesions over a 12 week period on naturally infested dogs in west central FL USA. Methods: Thirty-four dogs with natural flea infestations living in 17 homes were treated once with a fluralaner chew on study day 0. Another 27 dogs living in 17 different homes were treated orally with an afoxolaner chewable on day 0, once between days 28–30 and once again between days 54–60. All products were administered according to label directions by study investigators. Flea populations on pets were assessed using visual area counts and premise flea infestations were assessed using intermittent-light flea traps on days 0, 7, 14, 21, and once between days 28–30, 40–45, 54–60 and 82–86. Dermatologic assessments were conducted on day 0 and once monthly. Pruritus assessments were conducted by owners throughout the study. No concurrent treatments for existing skin disease (antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, anti-fungals) were allowed.
    [Show full text]
  • Darolutamide in Nonmetastatic, Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
    The new england journal of medicine Original Article Darolutamide in Nonmetastatic, Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Karim Fizazi, M.D., Neal Shore, M.D., Teuvo L. Tammela, M.D., Ph.D., Albertas Ulys, M.D., Egils Vjaters, M.D., Sergey Polyakov, M.D., Mindaugas Jievaltas, M.D., Murilo Luz, M.D., Boris Alekseev, M.D., Iris Kuss, M.D., Christian Kappeler, Ph.D., Amir Snapir, M.D., Ph.D., Toni Sarapohja, M.Sc., and Matthew R. Smith, M.D., Ph.D., for the ARAMIS Investigators*​​ ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Darolutamide is a structurally unique androgen-receptor antagonist that is under de- From Institut Gustave Roussy, Université velopment for the treatment of prostate cancer. We evaluated the efficacy of darolu- Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France (K.F.); Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, tamide for delaying metastasis and death in men with nonmetastatic, castration- SC (N.S.); Tampere University Hospital resistant prostate cancer. and University of Tampere, Tampere (T.L.T.), and Orion Pharma, Orion Corporation, METHODS Espoo (A.S., T.S.) — all in Finland; Na- tional Cancer Institute, Vilnius (A.U.), We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial involving and Medical Academy, Lithuanian Uni- men with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer and a prostate-specific versity of Health Sciences, Kaunas (M.J.) antigen doubling time of 10 months or less. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 — both in Lithuania; Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia (E.V.); ratio to receive darolutamide (600 mg [two 300-mg tablets] twice daily) or placebo N.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Center while continuing androgen-deprivation therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicines Regulations 1984 (SR 1984/143)
    Reprint as at 1 July 2014 Medicines Regulations 1984 (SR 1984/143) David Beattie, Governor-General Order in Council At the Government House at Wellington this 5th day of June 1984 Present: His Excellency the Governor-General in Council Pursuant to section 105 of the Medicines Act 1981, and, in the case of Part 3 of the regulations, to section 62 of that Act, His Excellency the Governor-General, acting on the advice of the Minister of Health tendered after consultation with the organisations and bodies that ap- peared to the Minister to be representatives of persons likely to be substantially affected, and by and with the advice and consent of the Executive Council, hereby makes the following regulations. Contents Page 1 Title and commencement 5 Note Changes authorised by subpart 2 of Part 2 of the Legislation Act 2012 have been made in this official reprint. Note 4 at the end of this reprint provides a list of the amendments incorporated. These regulations are administered by the Ministry of Health. 1 Reprinted as at Medicines Regulations 1984 1 July 2014 2 Interpretation 5 Part 1 Classification of medicines 3 Classification of medicines 11 Part 2 Standards 4 Standards for medicines, related products, medical 11 devices, cosmetics, and surgical dressings 5 Pharmacist may dilute medicine in particular case 12 6 Colouring substances [Revoked] 12 Part 3 Advertisements 7 Advertisements not to claim official approval 13 8 Advertisements for medicines 13 9 Advertisements for related products 15 10 Advertisements for medical devices 15 11 Advertisements
    [Show full text]
  • Properties and Units in Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology
    Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 479–552, 2000. © 2000 IUPAC INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE SCIENTIFIC DIVISION COMMITTEE ON NOMENCLATURE, PROPERTIES, AND UNITS (C-NPU)# and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY CHEMISTRY AND HUMAN HEALTH DIVISION CLINICAL CHEMISTRY SECTION COMMISSION ON NOMENCLATURE, PROPERTIES, AND UNITS (C-NPU)§ PROPERTIES AND UNITS IN THE CLINICAL LABORATORY SCIENCES PART XII. PROPERTIES AND UNITS IN CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY (Technical Report) (IFCC–IUPAC 1999) Prepared for publication by HENRIK OLESEN1, DAVID COWAN2, RAFAEL DE LA TORRE3 , IVAN BRUUNSHUUS1, MORTEN ROHDE1, and DESMOND KENNY4 1Office of Laboratory Informatics, Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Drug Control Centre, London University, King’s College, London, UK; 3IMIM, Dr. Aiguader 80, Barcelona, Spain; 4Dept. of Clinical Biochemistry, Our Lady’s Hospital for Sick Children, Crumlin, Dublin 12, Ireland #§The combined Memberships of the Committee and the Commission (C-NPU) during the preparation of this report (1994–1996) were as follows: Chairman: H. Olesen (Denmark, 1989–1995); D. Kenny (Ireland, 1996); Members: X. Fuentes-Arderiu (Spain, 1991–1997); J. G. Hill (Canada, 1987–1997); D. Kenny (Ireland, 1994–1997); H. Olesen (Denmark, 1985–1995); P. L. Storring (UK, 1989–1995); P. Soares de Araujo (Brazil, 1994–1997); R. Dybkær (Denmark, 1996–1997); C. McDonald (USA, 1996–1997). Please forward comments to: H. Olesen, Office of Laboratory Informatics 76-6-1, Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), 9 Blegdamsvej, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] Republication or reproduction of this report or its storage and/or dissemination by electronic means is permitted without the need for formal IUPAC permission on condition that an acknowledgment, with full reference to the source, along with use of the copyright symbol ©, the name IUPAC, and the year of publication, are prominently visible.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 6.12: Deaths from Poisoning, by Sex and Cause, Scotland, 2016
    Table 6.12: Deaths from poisoning, by sex and cause, Scotland, 2016 ICD code(s), cause of death and substance(s) 1 Both Males Females ALL DEATHS FROM POISONING 2 1130 766 364 ACCIDENTS 850 607 243 X40 - X49 Accidental poisoning by and exposure to … X40 - Nonopioid analgesics, antipyretics and antirheumatics Paracetamol 2 1 1 Paracetamol, Cocaine, Amphetamine || 1 0 1 X41 - Antiepileptic, sedative-hypnotic, antiparkinsonism and psychotropic drugs, not elsewhere classified Alprazolam, MDMA, Cocaine || Cannabis, Alcohol 1 1 0 Alprazolam, Methadone || Pregabalin, Tramadol, Gabapentin, Cannabis 1 1 0 Alprazolam, Morphine, Heroin, Dihydrocodeine, Buprenorphine || Alcohol 1 1 0 Alprazolam, Oxycodone, Alcohol || Paracetamol 1 0 1 Amitriptyline, Cocaine, Etizolam || Paracetamol, Codeine, Hydrocodone, Alcohol 1 1 0 Amitriptyline, Dihydrocodeine || Diazepam, Paracetamol, Verapamil, Alcohol 1 1 0 Amitriptyline, Fluoxetine, Alcohol 1 0 1 Amitriptyline, Methadone, Diazepam || 1 1 0 Amitriptyline, Methadone, Morphine, Etizolam || Gabapentin, Cannabis, Alcohol 1 1 0 Amitriptyline, Venlafaxine 1 0 1 Amphetamine 1 1 0 Amphetamine || 1 1 0 Amphetamine || Alcohol 1 1 0 Amphetamine || Chlorpromazine 1 1 0 Amphetamine || Fluoxetine 1 1 0 Amphetamine, Dihydrocodeine, Alcohol || Procyclidine, Tramadol, Duloxetine, Haloperidol 1 0 1 Amphetamine, MDMA || Diclazepam, Cannabis, Alcohol 1 1 0 Amphetamine, Methadone || 1 1 0 Amphetamine, Oxycodone, Gabapentin, Zopiclone, Diazepam || Paracetamol, Alcohol 1 0 1 Amphetamine, Tramadol || Mirtazapine, Alcohol 1 1 0 Benzodiazepine
    [Show full text]
  • Benzodiazepine Group ELISA Kit
    Benzodiazepine Group ELISA Kit Benzodiazepine Background Since their introduction in the 1960s, benzodiazepines have been widely prescribed for the treatment of anxiety, insomnia, muscle spasms, alcohol withdrawal, and seizure-prevention as they are depressants of the central nervous system. Despite the fact that they are highly effective for their intended use, benzodiazepines are prescribed with caution as they can be highly addictive. In fact, researchers at NIDA (National Institute on Drug Abuse) have shown that addiction for benzodiazepines is similar to that of opioids, cannabinoids, and GHB. Common street names of benzodiazepines include “Benzos” and “Downers”. The five most encountered benzodiazepines on the illicit market are alprazolam (Xanax), lorazepam (Ativan), clonazepam (Klonopin), diazepam (Valium), and temazepam (Restori). The method of abuse is typically oral or snorted in crushed form. The DEA notes a particularly high rate of abuse among heroin and cocaine abusers. Designer benzodiazepines are currently offered in online shops selling “research chemicals”, providing drug abusers an alternative to prescription-only benzodiazepines. Data defining pharmacokinetic parameters, drug metabolisms, and detectability in biological fluids is limited. This lack of information presents a challenge to forensic laboratories. Changes in national narcotics laws in many countries led to the control of (phenazepam and etizolam), which were marketed by pharmaceutical companies in some countries. With the control of phenazepam and etizolam, clandestine laboratories have begun researching and manufacturing alternative benzodiazepines as legal substitutes. Delorazepam, diclazepam, pyrazolam, and flubromazepam have emerged as compounds in this class of drugs. References Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control. “Benzodiazepines.” http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/drugs_concern/benzo_1.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Anti-Doping Agency
    2019U.S. ANTI-DOPING AGENCY WALLET CARDEXAMPLES OF PROHIBITED AND PERMITTED SUBSTANCES AND METHODS Effective Jan. 1 – Dec. 31, 2019 CATEGORIES OF SUBSTANCES PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES (IN AND OUT-OF-COMPETITION) • Non-Approved Substances: investigational drugs and pharmaceuticals with no approval by a governmental regulatory health authority for human therapeutic use. • Anabolic Agents: androstenediol, androstenedione, bolasterone, boldenone, clenbuterol, danazol, desoxymethyltestosterone (madol), dehydrochlormethyltestosterone (DHCMT), Prasterone (dehydroepiandrosterone, DHEA , Intrarosa) and its prohormones, drostanolone, epitestosterone, methasterone, methyl-1-testosterone, methyltestosterone (Covaryx, EEMT, Est Estrogens-methyltest DS, Methitest), nandrolone, oxandrolone, prostanozol, Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (enobosarm, (ostarine, MK-2866), andarine, LGD-4033, RAD-140). stanozolol, testosterone and its metabolites or isomers (Androgel), THG, tibolone, trenbolone, zeranol, zilpaterol, and similar substances. • Beta-2 Agonists: All selective and non-selective beta-2 agonists, including all optical isomers, are prohibited. Most inhaled beta-2 agonists are prohibited, including arformoterol (Brovana), fenoterol, higenamine (norcoclaurine, Tinospora crispa), indacaterol (Arcapta), levalbuterol (Xopenex), metaproternol (Alupent), orciprenaline, olodaterol (Striverdi), pirbuterol (Maxair), terbutaline (Brethaire), vilanterol (Breo). The only exceptions are albuterol, formoterol, and salmeterol by a metered-dose inhaler when used
    [Show full text]
  • Part I Biopharmaceuticals
    1 Part I Biopharmaceuticals Translational Medicine: Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Discovery First Edition. Edited by Robert A. Meyers. © 2018 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. Published 2018 by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. 3 1 Analogs and Antagonists of Male Sex Hormones Robert W. Brueggemeier The Ohio State University, Division of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA 1Introduction6 2 Historical 6 3 Endogenous Male Sex Hormones 7 3.1 Occurrence and Physiological Roles 7 3.2 Biosynthesis 8 3.3 Absorption and Distribution 12 3.4 Metabolism 13 3.4.1 Reductive Metabolism 14 3.4.2 Oxidative Metabolism 17 3.5 Mechanism of Action 19 4 Synthetic Androgens 24 4.1 Current Drugs on the Market 24 4.2 Therapeutic Uses and Bioassays 25 4.3 Structure–Activity Relationships for Steroidal Androgens 26 4.3.1 Early Modifications 26 4.3.2 Methylated Derivatives 26 4.3.3 Ester Derivatives 27 4.3.4 Halo Derivatives 27 4.3.5 Other Androgen Derivatives 28 4.3.6 Summary of Structure–Activity Relationships of Steroidal Androgens 28 4.4 Nonsteroidal Androgens, Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs) 30 4.5 Absorption, Distribution, and Metabolism 31 4.6 Toxicities 32 Translational Medicine: Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Discovery First Edition. Edited by Robert A. Meyers. © 2018 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. Published 2018 by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. 4 Analogs and Antagonists of Male Sex Hormones 5 Anabolic Agents 32 5.1 Current Drugs on the Market 32 5.2 Therapeutic Uses and Bioassays
    [Show full text]
  • The Misuse of Benzodiazepines Among High-Risk Opioid Users in Europe
    EMBARGO — 7 JUNE 7. 6. 2018 UPDATED 11:30 Central European Time/CET (10:30 Western European Time/WET/Lisbon) Proof - 28 May 2018 not for circulation PERSPECTIVES ON DRUGS The misuse of benzodiazepines among high-risk opioid users in Europe Benzodiazepines are a widely prescribed I Introduction group of medicines with a range of clinical uses that include treating Benzodiazepines have a range of clinical uses and are among the most commonly prescribed medicines globally. anxiety, insomnia and managing alcohol They are useful in the short-term treatment of anxiety and withdrawal. This group of medicines is insomnia, and in managing alcohol withdrawal (Medicines often misused by high-risk opioid users, and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, 2015). Like all medicines, benzodiazepines can produce side effects. They and this is associated with considerable may also be misused, which we define as use without a morbidity and mortality. This paper prescription from a medical practitioner or, if prescribed, when describes the impact of benzodiazepines they are used outside accepted medical practice or guidelines. misuse on the health and treatment of While the misuse of benzodiazepines has been identified high-risk opioid users. as a concern for large groups in the general population, for example, among elderly people and women, this analysis focuses specifically on misuse among high-risk opioid users (1), a group of people among whom these medicines have been linked with severe treatment challenges and implicated in considerable numbers of drug-related deaths. It is important to stress that much benzodiazepine prescribing to high-risk drug users is done with legitimate therapeutic aims in mind.
    [Show full text]