DOCSLIB.ORG

Terrestrial Planets – Begin with Mercury

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Terrestrial Planets – Begin with Mercury Terrestrial Planets – Begin With Mercury 1 2 Guiding Questions 1. What makes Mercury such a difficult planet to see? 2. What is unique about Mercury’s rotation? 3. How do the surface features on Mercury differ from those on the Moon? 4. Is Mercury’s internal structure more like that of the Earth or the Moon? 88 days 3 4 Solar Transit Earth-based optical observations of Mercury are difficult Transits occur • At its greatest eastern and western elongation, about Mercury is never more than 28° from the Sun twelve • It can be seen for only brief periods just after times a sunset or before sunrise century when the sun, Earth and Mercury are There was a aligned transit on 5 November 8, 6 2006 1 Earth-based Views of Mercury Mercury rotates slowly and has an unusual Difficulties observing Mercury from Earth led early spin-orbiting coupling astronomers to incorrectly decide that Mercury always kept the same face towards the sun in synchronous orbit Note phases like the moon 7 8 Radio telescope observations from sites such as Arecibo gave evidence of a non-synchronous orbit 9 10 •Mercury • Strong tidal spins 1 ½ effects, Mercury’s times on slightly its axis elongated for every shape and its complete very orbit eccentric •Mercury orbit cause spins this strange 3-to-2 orbit three times •A “day”of solar light on during Mercury every two would be 88 orbits11 earth days 12 2 MESSENGER Spacecraft Images from Mariner 10 revealed Mercury’s heavily cratered surface • Most of our detailed information about Mercury’s surface is from the Mariner 10 Image from Flyby #3 - 2009 flyby mission in 1974/1975. • Mariner only saw one side of the planet. • The MESSENGER mission spacecraft is now at Mercury. – It is adjusting its flight path for an ultimate orbit of Mercury – 3 flybys to date – Will achieve orbit in 2011 13 14 •Heavily cratered surface Note • Less how dense much cratering more than moon densely •Gently the rolling craters plains occur on •Scarps the •No Moon’s evidence of surface. tectonics 15 16 Scarps are cliffs This one is more than a km high They probably formed as the planet cooled and shrank 17 18 3 The seismic waves from •The the impact Caloris that caused the Caloris Basin is Basin caused evidence this of a large deformation on the impact opposite side of Mercury 19 20 Mercury has an iron core and a surprising magnetic field • Most iron-rich planet in the solar system with a core that is 75% of the diameter • The earth’s core is 55% of its diameter and the moon’s core is 20% of its diameter • Highest density for the planets • Weak magnetic field indicating part of the core is liquid • Magnetic field causes a magnetosphere similar to Earth’s but weaker This may be evidence of ice at 21 22 Mercury’s North Pole. 23 24 4 The magnetosphere blocks the solar wind from reaching the surface of the planet 25 26 Cloud-Covered Venus 27 28 • At its greatest Guiding Questions eastern and western elongations, Venus 1. What makes Venus such a brilliant “morning star” or “evening star”? is about 47° from 2. What is strange about the rotation of Venus? the Sun 3. In what ways does Venus’s atmosphere differ • It can be seen for radically from our own? several hours after 4. Why do astronomers suspect that there are active sunset or before volcanoes on Venus? sunrise 5. Why is there almost no water on Venus today? Why do astronomers think that water was once very common on Venus? 6. Does Venus have the same kind of active surface geology as the Earth? 29 30 5 The surface of Venus is hidden beneath a thick, In 1962 the unmanned U.S. spacecraft highly reflective cloud cover Mariner 2 made the first close flyby of Venus •Venus is similar to the Earth in its size, mass, average density, and surface gravity •It is covered by unbroken, highly reflective clouds that conceal its other features from Earth-based observers 31 32 Venus’s rotation is slow and “retrograde” Venus has a hot, dense atmosphere and corrosive cloud layers • Spacecraft measurements reveal that 96.5% of the Venusian atmosphere is carbon dioxide • Most of the balance of the atmosphere is nitrogen. • Venus’s clouds consist of droplets of concentrated sulfuric acid. • The surface pressure on Venus is 90 atm, and the surface temperature is 460°C • Venus rotates slowly in a retrograde direction with a solar day of 117 • Both temperature and Earth days and a rotation period of 243 Earth days pressure decrease as altitude increases • There are approximately two Venusian solar days in a Venusian year. 33 34 The upper cloud layers of the Venusian atmosphere move rapidly around the planet in a retrograde direction, with a period of only about The circulation of the Venusian atmosphere is dominated by two huge 4 Earth days convection currents in the cloud layers, one in the northern hemisphere 35 and one in the southern hemisphere 36 6 Volcanic eruptions are probably responsible for Venus’s clouds •Venus’s clouds consist of droplets of concentrated sulfuric acid •Active volcanoes on Venus may be a continual source of this sulfurous material The density of craters suggests that the entire surface of Venus is no more than a few hundred million years old. According to the equilibrium resurfacing hypothesis, this happens because old craters are erased by 37 38 ongoing volcanic eruptions The climate on Venus followed a different evolutionary path from that on Earth • Venus’s high temperature is caused by the greenhouse effect, as the dense carbon dioxide atmosphere traps and retains energy from sunlight. • The early atmosphere of Venus contained substantial amounts of water vapor • This caused a runaway greenhouse effect that evaporated Venus’s oceans and drove carbon dioxide out of the rocks and into the atmosphere • Almost all of the water vapor was eventually lost by the action of ultraviolet radiation on the upper atmosphere. • The Earth has roughly as much carbon dioxide as Venus, but it has been dissolved in the Earth’s oceans 39 and chemically bound into its rocks 40 The surface of Venus shows no evidence of plate tectonics • The surface of Venus is surprisingly flat, mostly covered with gently rolling hills • There are a few major highlands and several large volcanoes • The surface of Venus shows no evidence of the motion of large crustal plates, which plays a major role in shaping the Earth’s surface 41 42 7 43 44 Venusian Surfaces 45 46 What I’ll Talk About Mars • Some history – a view at the start of the 20th century • Mariners to Mars • Viking Mission – in search of life of Mars •A meteorite – in search of life in a rock • Some latest views from Mars •Conclusions – keeping it simple 47 48 8 The High Hopes • “The planet Mars, on the other hand, exhibits in the clearest manner the traces of adaptation to the wants of living beings such as we are acquainted with. Processes are at work out yonder in space which appear utterly useless, a real waste of Nature’s energies, unless, like their correlatives on earth, they subserve the wants of 49 organized beings.” [Richard Proctor, 1902] 50 From Schiaparelli… To Percival Lowell • As seen by telescopes from Earth • Percival Lowell – An orange-red orb, with (1855-1916) some darker patches and bright polar caps sometimes – appointed MIT visible astronomy professor • Giovanni Virginio in 1902 Schiaparelli (1835-1910) – published books – 1876 announced discovery • Mars (1895) of “canali” (channels) on • Mars and its Canals Mars (1906) – misreported as canals • Mars as the Abode (artificial) by the press 51 of Life (1908) 52 More Historical Background Lowell’s Observations and Explanation • At the turn of the 20th century: •No canals – publication offered a reward for anyone • human brain tendencies coming forth with proof of life on another • connect unrelated planet or anywhere in space EXCEPTING points together by lines Mars • Recent theory – just about every major observatory had • Lowell’s telescope acted as released hand paintings of Mars and some an ophthalmoscope were even releasing photographs as • caused Lowell to see astrophotography was in its infancy the reflection of the • no two drawings could agree on the radial pattern of his own formations on the planet's surface retinal blood vessels •they showed a Mars with a varied surface possessing darker and lighter areas, as well as the polar caps 53 54 9 Mariner 4, 6 and 7 Mariner 4 Photographs •Mariner 4 – Mars flyby mission – closest approach came on July 15, 1965 – pictures from this mission showed no canals and a surface that was disappointingly looking like that of the moon, quite LIFELESS • In 1969 the United States launched Mariner 6 (February) and Mariner 7 (March) • At closest approach (July for Mariner 6 and August for Mariner 7) both craft were at a distance of approximately 3400 kilometers 55 56 Mariners 6 and 7 A Time to Fail and Succeed • The Mariners (6 & 7) contained: • In 1969 – narrow and wide angle cameras – two unsuccessful attempts by the Russians – infra-red radiometer • In 1971 – both Americans and Russians had unsuccessful – infra-red spectrometer missions to Mars – ultra-violet spectrometer – Russian Mars 2 and Mars 3 • Temperature, pressure and atmospheric • both equipped with lander modules but neither lander was successful constituents were analyzed – Americans Mariner 9 • Pictures were still anything but • reached Mars during a global dust storm – the storm did eventually subside and the mission was spectacular enough of a success so as to provide pictures for the 57 choosing of a site for landing the upcoming Viking missions 58 Mariner’s Atmosphere Mariner 9 Photographs
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Financial Support for the Development of These Album Pages Provided by Mystic Stamp Company America's Leading Stamp Dealer
    SPACE ON STAMPS Created for free use in the public domain American Philatelic Society ©2010 • www.stamps.org Financial support for the development of these album pages provided by Mystic Stamp Company America’s Leading Stamp Dealer and proud of its support of the American Philatelic Society www.MysticStamp.com, 800-433-7811 Space on Stamps ou might say, it all started with the dream of flight and a desire to see the world as the birds do. For tens of thousands of years mankind has watched the stars Yand wondered what they might represent. Possibly the oldest constellation identified by humans as a permanent fixture in the night sky is Ursa Major, the Great Bear, the third largest of the constellations, and best known for the seven stars that make up its rump and tail: the Big Dipper (also known as the Plough or the Wagon). The most helpful of the sky maps, a line drawn though the two outside stars on the bowl of the “dipper” points directly to the North Star. Nothing successfully got human beings above the earth on a repeatable basis, however, until the age of ballooning. The first human to go aloft was a scientist, Pilatre de Rozier, who rose 250 feet into the sky in a hot air balloon and remained suspended above the French countryside for fifteen minutes in October 1783. A month later he and the Marquis d’Arlandes traveled about 5½ miles in the first free flight, using a balloon designed by the Montgolfier brothers. The first North American flight was made January 9, 1793, from Philadelphia to Gloucester County, New Jersey.
    [Show full text]
  • Electron Energetics in the Martian Dayside Ionosphere: Model Comparisons with MAVEN Data Shotaro Sakai1, Laila Andersson2, Thomas E
    Electron energetics in the Martian dayside ionosphere: Model comparisons with MAVEN data Shotaro Sakai1, Laila Andersson2, Thomas E. Cravens1, David L. Mitchell3, Christian Mazelle4,5, Ali Rahmati1,3, Christopher M. Fowler2, Stephen W. Bougher6, Edward M. B. Thiemann2, Francis G. Eparvier2, Juan M. Fontenla7, Paul R. Mahaffy8, John E. P. Connerney8, and Bruce M. Jakosky2 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kansas, Malott Hall, 1251 Wescoe Hall Drive, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA 2Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado Boulder, 1234 Innovation Drive, Boulder, Colorado 80303, USA 3Space Science Laboratory, University of California, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, California 94720, USA 4Université de Toulouse, UPS-OMP, IRAP, Toulouse, France 5CNRS, IRAP, 9 Av. Colonel Roche, BP 44346-31028 Toulouse Cedex 4, France 6Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, 2455 Hayward Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA 7NorthWest Research Associates, 3380 Mitchell Ln, Boulder, Colorado 80301, USA 8NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Rd, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA Corresponding Author: Thomas E. Cravens, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kansas, Malott Hall, 1251 Wescoe Hall Drive, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA ([email protected]) Main points * High electron temperatures (e.g., 3000 K) can be obtained in the Martian topside ionosphere without invoking solar wind heating. * The magnetic topology is a key factor in determining electron temperatures and photoelectron fluxes at Mars. This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Sector Brochure
    SPACE SPACE REVOLUTIONIZING THE WAY TO SPACE SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGIES PROPULSION Moog provides components and subsystems for cold gas, chemical, and electric Moog is a proven leader in components, subsystems, and systems propulsion and designs, develops, and manufactures complete chemical propulsion for spacecraft of all sizes, from smallsats to GEO spacecraft. systems, including tanks, to accelerate the spacecraft for orbit-insertion, station Moog has been successfully providing spacecraft controls, in- keeping, or attitude control. Moog makes thrusters from <1N to 500N to support the space propulsion, and major subsystems for science, military, propulsion requirements for small to large spacecraft. and commercial operations for more than 60 years. AVIONICS Moog is a proven provider of high performance and reliable space-rated avionics hardware and software for command and data handling, power distribution, payload processing, memory, GPS receivers, motor controllers, and onboard computing. POWER SYSTEMS Moog leverages its proven spacecraft avionics and high-power control systems to supply hardware for telemetry, as well as solar array and battery power management and switching. Applications include bus line power to valves, motors, torque rods, and other end effectors. Moog has developed products for Power Management and Distribution (PMAD) Systems, such as high power DC converters, switching, and power stabilization. MECHANISMS Moog has produced spacecraft motion control products for more than 50 years, dating back to the historic Apollo and Pioneer programs. Today, we offer rotary, linear, and specialized mechanisms for spacecraft motion control needs. Moog is a world-class manufacturer of solar array drives, propulsion positioning gimbals, electric propulsion gimbals, antenna positioner mechanisms, docking and release mechanisms, and specialty payload positioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Core Structure—Concise Review and Anticipated Insights from Insight George Helffrich
    Helffrich Progress in Earth and Planetary Science (2017) 4:24 Progress in Earth and DOI 10.1186/s40645-017-0139-4 Planetary Science REVIEW Open Access Mars core structure—concise review and anticipated insights from InSight George Helffrich Abstract This review summarizes the knowledge of Mars’ interior structure, its inferred composition, and the anticipated seismological properties arising from its composition with particular focus on Mars’ core. The emphasis on the core stems from the unusual morphology of the liquidus diagram of iron at moderate pressures when enriched in sulfur. From a fairly detailed liquidus diagram constructed from experimental studies, I identify a set of processes that could act within Mars’ core: an iron “snow” from the core-mantle boundary’s surface and a Fe3−xS2 “ground fog” forming at the base of the core. Depending on temperature and bulk sulfur composition, these could form an inner core or could stratify the outer core by enriching it in sulfur, or both. Core stratification could be one explanation for the extinction of Mars’ magnetic field early in the planet’s history, and I demonstrate the feasibility of this mechanism. The crystallization processes in the core could be observable in the seismic data that the future Mars geophysical mission, InSight, is planned to provide. The core size, the presence of an inner core, and the wavespeed profile of the outer core, whose radial derivative provides a proxy for changes in composition, are key observables to seek. Keywords: Mars, InSight, Dynamo, Core, Fe-FeS phase relations, Stratification Introduction Consequently, physical parameters provided by astro- The Earth’s density distribution is known principally nomical and orbital measurements yield the only con- through the eigenfrequencies of its whole-body oscil- straints on Mars’ internal structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Insight Spacecraft Launch for Mission to Interior of Mars
    InSight Spacecraft Launch for Mission to Interior of Mars InSight is a robotic scientific explorer to investigate the deep interior of Mars set to launch May 5, 2018. It is scheduled to land on Mars November 26, 2018. It will allow us to better understand the origin of Mars. First Launch of Project Orion Project Orion took its first unmanned mission Exploration flight Test-1 (EFT-1) on December 5, 2014. It made two orbits in four hours before splashing down in the Pacific. The flight tested many subsystems, including its heat shield, electronics and parachutes. Orion will play an important role in NASA's journey to Mars. Orion will eventually carry astronauts to an asteroid and to Mars on the Space Launch System. Mars Rover Curiosity Lands After a nine month trip, Curiosity landed on August 6, 2012. The rover carries the biggest, most advanced suite of instruments for scientific studies ever sent to the martian surface. Curiosity analyzes samples scooped from the soil and drilled from rocks to record of the planet's climate and geology. Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Begins Mission at Mars NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter launched from Cape Canaveral August 12. 2005, to find evidence that water persisted on the surface of Mars. The instruments zoom in for photography of the Martian surface, analyze minerals, look for subsurface water, trace how much dust and water are distributed in the atmosphere, and monitor daily global weather. Spirit and Opportunity Land on Mars January 2004, NASA landed two Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, on opposite sides of Mars.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting to Mars How Close Is Mars?
    Getting to Mars How close is Mars? Exploring Mars 1960-2004 Of 42 probes launched: 9 crashed on launch or failed to leave Earth orbit 4 failed en route to Mars 4 failed to stop at Mars 1 failed on entering Mars orbit 1 orbiter crashed on Mars 6 landers crashed on Mars 3 flyby missions succeeded 9 orbiters succeeded 4 landers succeeded 1 lander en route Score so far: Earthlings 16, Martians 25, 1 in play Mars Express Mars Exploration Rover Mars Exploration Rover Mars Exploration Rover 1: Meridiani (Opportunity) 2: Gusev (Spirit) 3: Isidis (Beagle-2) 4: Mars Polar Lander Launch Window 21: Jun-Jul 2003 Mars Express 2003 Jun 2 In Mars orbit Dec 25 Beagle 2 Lander 2003 Jun 2 Crashed at Isidis Dec 25 Spirit/ Rover A 2003 Jun 10 Landed at Gusev Jan 4 Opportunity/ Rover B 2003 Jul 8 Heading to Meridiani on Sunday Launch Window 1: Oct 1960 1M No. 1 1960 Oct 10 Rocket crashed in Siberia 1M No. 2 1960 Oct 14 Rocket crashed in Kazakhstan Launch Window 2: October-November 1962 2MV-4 No. 1 1962 Oct 24 Rocket blew up in parking orbit during Cuban Missile Crisis 2MV-4 No. 2 "Mars-1" 1962 Nov 1 Lost attitude control - Missed Mars by 200000 km 2MV-3 No. 1 1962 Nov 4 Rocket failed to restart in parking orbit The Mars-1 probe Launch Window 3: November 1964 Mariner 3 1964 Nov 5 Failed after launch, nose cone failed to separate Mariner 4 1964 Nov 28 SUCCESS, flyby in Jul 1965 3MV-4 No.
    [Show full text]
  • Explore Digital.Pdf
    EXPLORE “sic itur ad astra” ~ thus you shall go to the stars EXPERTISE FOR THE MISSION We’ve built more interplanetary spacecraft than all other U.S. companies combined. We’re ready for humanity’s next step, for Earth, the Sun, our planets … and beyond. We do this for the New capability explorers. And for us for a new space era Achieving in space takes tenacity. Lockheed Martin brings more We’ve never missed a tight (and finite) capability to the table than ever planetary mission launch window. before, creating better data, new Yet, despite how far we go, the most images and groundbreaking ways to important technologies we develop work. And we’re doing it with smarter improve life now, closer to home. factories and common products, Here on Earth. making our systems increasingly affordable and faster to produce. HALF A CENTURY AT MARS Getting to space is hard. Each step past that is increasingly harder. We’ve been a part of every NASA mission to Mars, and we know what it takes to arrive on another planet and explore. Our proven work includes aeroshells, autonomous deep space operations or building orbiters and landers, like InSight. AEROSHELLS VIKING 1 VIKING 2 PATHFINDER MARS POLAR SPIRIT OPPORTUNITY PHOENIX CURIOSITY INSIGHT MARS 2020 1976 1976 1996 LANDER 2004 2018 2008 2012 2018 2020 1999 ORBITERS MARS OBSERVER MARS GLOBAL MARS CLIMATE MARS ODYSSEY MARS RECONNAISSANCE MAVEN 1993 SURVEYOR ORBITER 2001 ORBITER 2014 1997 1999 2006 LANDERS VIKING 1 VIKING 2 MARS POLAR PHOENIX INSIGHT 1976 1976 LANDER 2008 2018 1999 Taking humans back to the Moon – We bring solutions for our customers that include looking outside our organization to deliver the best science through our spacecraft and operations expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Insight Launch Press Kit
    Introduction National Aeronautics and Space Administration Mars InSight Launch Press Kit MAY 2018 www.nasa.gov 1 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction 4 Media Services 8 Quick Facts: Launch Facts 12 Quick Facts: Mars at a Glance 16 Mission: Overview 18 Mission: Spacecraft 30 Mission: Science 40 Mission: Landing Site 53 Program & Project Management 55 Appendix: Mars Cube One Tech Demo 56 Appendix: Gallery 60 Appendix: Science Objectives, Quantified 62 Appendix: Historical Mars Missions 63 Appendix: NASA’s Discovery Program 65 3 Introduction Mars InSight Launch Press Kit Introduction NASA’s next mission to Mars -- InSight -- will launch from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California as early as May 5, 2018. It is expected to land on the Red Planet on Nov. 26, 2018. InSight is a mission to Mars, but it is more than a Mars mission. It will help scientists understand the formation and early evolution of all rocky planets, including Earth. A technology demonstration called Mars Cube One (MarCO) will share the launch with InSight and fly separately to Mars. Six Ways InSight Is Different NASA has a long and successful track record at Mars. Since 1965, it has flown by, orbited, landed and roved across the surface of the Red Planet. None of that has been easy. Only about 40 percent of the missions ever sent to Mars by any space agency have been successful. The planet’s thin atmosphere makes landing a challenge; its extreme temperature swings make it difficult to operate on the surface. But if a spacecraft survives the trip, there’s a bounty of science to be collected.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Spaceport
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration America’s Spaceport www.nasa.gov America’s Spaceport John F. Kennedy Space Center “This generation does not intend to founder in the backwash of the coming age of space. We mean to be a part of it — we mean to lead it.” President John Fitzgerald Kennedy September 12, 1962 he John F. Kennedy Space Center — America’s Spaceport — is the doorway to upon Spanish treasure ships laden with riches from space. From its unique facilities, humans and machines have begun the exploration the mines of Mexico and Peru. Shoals, reefs and T of the solar system, reaching out to the sun, the moon, the planets and beyond. storms also exacted their toll on the treasure fleets, While these spectacular achievements have fired the imagination of people throughout leaving behind a sunken bonanza now being reaped the world and enriched the lives of millions, they represent only a beginning. At America’s by modern-day treasure hunters. Spaceport, humanity’s long-cherished dream of establishing permanent outposts on the new space frontier is becoming a reality. By the early 18th century, America’s Spaceport Origins echoed with the footsteps of other intruders: Yet, our leap toward the stars is also an epilogue to a rich and colorful past . an almost English settlers and their Indian allies (the latter to forgotten legacy replete with Indian lore, stalwart adventurers, sunken treasure and hardy become known as the Seminoles) from colonies in pioneers. Georgia and South Carolina. Thus began a new era of conflict and expansion that ouldw continue until The sands of America’s Spaceport bear the imprint of New World history from its earliest the end of the Second U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • + Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Launch Press
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Launch Press Kit August 2005 Media Contacts Dolores Beasley Policy/Program Management 202/358-1753 Headquarters [email protected] Washington, D.C. Guy Webster Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Mission 818/354-5011 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, [email protected] Pasadena, Calif. George Diller Launch 321/867-2468 Kennedy Space Center, Fla. [email protected] Joan Underwood Spacecraft & Launch Vehicle 303/971-7398 Lockheed Martin Space Systems [email protected] Denver, Colo. Contents General Release ..................................………………………..........................................…..... 3 Media Services Information ………………………………………..........................................…..... 5 Quick Facts ………………………………………………………................................….………… 6 Mars at a Glance ………………………………………………………..................................………. 7 Where We've Been and Where We're Going ……………………................…………................... 8 Science Investigations ............................................................................................................... 12 Technology Objectives .............................................................................................................. 21 Mission Overview ……………...………………………………………...............................………. 22 Spacecraft ................................................................................................................................. 33 Mars: The Water Trail …………………………………………………………………...............……
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of Mars' Atmosphere up to 100 Kilometers from the Entry
    would be released as the martian atmo- struments flown on sounding rockets and sphere struck the surface, a phenomenon terrestrial satellites, by about a factor of seen earlier during perigee passes of the x 0.01 103. The low-mass spectra are currently Earth orbital satellites Explorer C, Ex- being analyzed: preliminary results sug- plorer D, and Explorer E. The mass peak 15N 14N 15N 14N 14N 14N gest upper limits for the mixing ratios of at 16 includes contributions from CO2, TERRESTRIAL H2 and He relative to CO2 of about 10-4. CO, 02, and H2O, in addition to a residu- A. 0. NIER al most probably due to 0. A quan- School of Physics and Astronomy, titative analysis is difficult, however, 12 170 University ofMinnesota, Minneapolis since 0 may be expected to react rapidly M. B. McELROY with surfaces in the instrument. It is Center for Earth and Planetary hoped that further laboratory studies will 13c 1O J2c 160, Physics, Harvard University, clarify these matters, and that they might Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 eventually permit a more quantitative es- timate for the concentration of 0. 14N 160 References and Notes 1. A. 0. Nier, W. B. Hanson, A. Seiff, M. B. The densities of NO, as shown in Fig. NOISE 12 _8 McElroy, N. W. Spencer, R. J. Duckett, T. C. 2, were obtained from a detailed analysis D. Knight, W. S. Cook, Science 193, 786 (1976). 30 29 28 A typographical error appears in line 11, column of the peak at mass number 30. Figure 3 MASS (AMU) 1, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Exploration Entry, Descent and Landing Challenges1,2
    Mars Exploration Entry, Descent and Landing Challenges1,2 Robert D. Braun Robert M. Manning Georgia Institute of Technology Jet Propulsion Laboratory Atlanta, GA 30332-0150 California Institute of Technology (404) 385-6171 Pasadena, CA 91109 [email protected] (818) 393-7815 [email protected] Abstract—The United States has successfully landed five interesting locations within close proximity (10’s of m) of robotic systems on the surface of Mars. These systems all pre-positioned robotic assets. These plans require a had landed mass below 0.6 metric tons (t), had landed simultaneous two order of magnitude increase in landed footprints on the order of hundreds of km and landed at sites mass capability, four order of magnitude increase in landed below -1 km MOLA elevation due the need to perform accuracy, and an entry, descent and landing operations entry, descent and landing operations in an environment sequence that may need to be completed in a lower density with sufficient atmospheric density. Current plans for (higher surface elevation) environment. This is a tall order human exploration of Mars call for the landing of 40-80 t that will require the space qualification of new EDL surface elements at scientifically interesting locations within approaches and technologies. close proximity (10’s of m) of pre-positioned robotic assets. This paper summarizes past successful entry, descent and Today, robotic exploration systems engineers are struggling landing systems and approaches being developed by the with the challenges of increasing landed mass capability to 1 robotic Mars exploration program to increased landed t while improving landed accuracy to 10’s of km and performance (mass, accuracy and surface elevation).
    [Show full text]