1-1-1996 Should the Michigan Supreme Court Adopt a Non-Majority Vote Rule for Granting Leave to Appeal? Carol A. Parker University of New Mexico - School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/law_facultyscholarship Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Carol A. Parker, Should the Michigan Supreme Court Adopt a Non-Majority Vote Rule for Granting Leave to Appeal?, 43 Wayne Law Review 345 (1996). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/law_facultyscholarship/251 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the UNM School of Law at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected]. SHOULD THE MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT ADOPT A NON-MAJORITY VOTE RULE FOR GRANTING LEAVE TO APPEAL? I.INTRODUcnON The MichiganSupreme Court enjoyed a reputation for activism and innovation in recent decades. The court took an active role in the development of civil liberties issuesand ton law innovations.1 During the past decade, however, the reputation of the Michigan Supreme Court has changed somewhat.! This shift appears to encompass not only a decline in the general reputation of the court for activism, but a more troublesome erosion of the court's reputation concerning its more fundamental role of providing guidanceto lower courts and the bar. Specifically, critics accusethe court of failing to produce an adequate number of opinions, and failing to provide adequate guidance for resolving inter-panel conflicts within the Michigan Court of Appeals.