Southern Alleghenies Greenways and Open Space Plan Executive

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Southern Alleghenies Greenways and Open Space Plan Executive Executive Summary Executive Summary Background 1. Conserve important natural resources; information has been made available to each of Analyzing Opportunities The Southern Alleghenies region, situated 2. Expand recreation opportunities; the counties for use on other planning projects. Previous planning efforts and the mapping in south-central Pennsylvania between 3. Celebrate cultural heritage; As a compliment to the technical nature of the of other data compiled for the Plan have Pittsburgh and Harrisburg, features 4,600 4. Bolster economic development; GIS analysis, an extensive public involvement revealed a number of opportunities and square miles of various man-made and 5. Increase pedestrian and bicycle process was incorporated into the planning challenges for the region. The key issues natural resources such as the historic Town mobility; and process so that review and feedback from that emerged include: of Bedford, the Laurel Highlands and the 6. Promote healthy lifestyles. residents of the counties and other key Juniata River. These resources provide the stakeholders could be gathered and Opportunities: Specific goals were also developed in incorporated. To guide the process, the region’s 470,000 residents with association with the six purposes collectively. Southern Alleghenies Regional Greenways opportunities for cultural and natural • Wealth of natural resources; resource preservation, recreation and These goals and purposes guided the Plan’s Committee was formed with representatives analyses, recommendations and actions that from each county, the Allegheny Ridge • Unique landscapes; economic development. The region is made • Existing projects underway; up of the following six counties: Bedford, emerged during the planning process. Corporation, the Western Pennsylvania • Abundance of existing/potential Blair, Cambria, Fulton, Huntingdon and Conservancy, Southern Alleghenies Planning public lands; Somerset. & Development Commission, Pennsylvania • Development pressures are Department of Transportation (PennDOT) and generally localized; and The Southern Alleghenies Greenways and Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and • Committed residents and Open Space Network Plan (the Plan) Natural Resources (DCNR). Additionally, public meetings and work sessions were held engaged political leadership. outlines a series of policies and projects for linking existing natural and man-made as the Plan progressed to gather additional resources within the region’s six counties. input from community groups, conservation Challenges: organizations, local political leadership and By connecting these assets into a comprehensive greenway network, the interested citizens. • Majority of existing open space is region’s natural resources are leveraged to unconnected; promote and strengthen their value to the • Limited regulatory tools are region for a range of purposes. available for implementation; • Environmental issues; In addition to delineating the elements that Figure 1: The Ridges and Valleys of the Southern Alleghenies Region • Funding and staffing resources make up the greenway network, the Plan for implementation; identifies a strategic framework for Planning Approach • Lack of a coordinated implementation and management. This In order to define a network of resource-based implementation approach; and framework provides an overall strategy for greenways, geographical information system • prioritizing greenways or project corridors Develop marketing and (GIS) mapping was used as the project’s as well as a palette of potential educational materials to build primary analytical tool. This analysis was implementation tools and a summary of awareness of the greenways completed through three key phases: the support and funding sources. vision. compilation of background mapping, establishing planning objectives and greenway Purpose and Goals Figure 2: Bedford Public Meeting criteria and the identification of potential The Plan was developed to achieve the greenway elements and corridors. The following purposes: resulting data as well as the background Southern Alleghenies Greenways and Open Space Network Plan May 2007 i Executive Summary Greenways and Open Space SchellsburgProject Connector Corridors creates a two-mile greenway to link Schellsburg (Bedford County) to the Allegheny GreenwaysVision and Open Space Crossing greenway via Shawnee State Park (Bedford VisionThrough an iterative planning process, an County). These two levels of greenway corridors – overall vision for the Plan was developed that County and Regional – were carefully optimized to both builds upon the region’s many balance the desire for a long-term vision and the need opportunities and addresses its challenges. for projects that can be initiated and completed at the Within this vision, greenways are comprised of local level by grass root efforts. two major elements: corridors and hubs. corridors are linear elements that, depending on their characteristics, are suitable for recreation Project Corridors or preservation purposes. Hubs are typically The greenways and open space networks as well as the non-linear sites that possess a common natural specific project corridors established throughout the or man-made asset, which makes them planning process defined a vision for an integrated significant. Natural hubs are considered habitat system of greenways that connect the region’s Figure 3: Laurel Hill Creek Figure 6: Bike Trails (www.gryphel.com) areas while man-made hubs are deemed numerous natural, historic and cultural assets. The destinations. Criteria developed through the project corridors seek to: planning process determined whether a corridor is suitable for recreation or • Link existing regional assets such as preservation and whether a hub is a destination biodiversity areas, State Forests, parks, or habitat. gamelands, steep slope complexes, stream valleys urban places and historic sites to Analysis of the mapping associated with each of establish the greenways network. these criteria delineated an open space network • Distinguish greenway elements as either that feature recreation and preservation conservation or recreation-oriented depending corridors as well as destinations and habitats. upon the types of features that comprise the From this overall open space network, a series greenway elements and their sensitivity to of greenway or project corridors for each human activity. individual county were established. • Delineate project corridors that can be implemented as discrete or individual projects. Figure 4: Greenwood Furnace Amish Buggies Figure 7: Glendale Lake at Prince Gallitzin State Park As the project corridors were developed, • Develop a balance of regional and county- significant corridors that spanned multiple significant project corridors to create a counties interconnected to other regions were comprehensive network of greenways. The designated as Regional Projects. These projects, balance proposed within the Plan is while more complex and difficult to implement, summarized in the table below. represent a grand vision of an integrated regional greenways network. For example, the Project Corridors proposed Allegheny Crossing traverses over 75 County County Regional miles as it connects the Great Allegheny Bedford 23 6 Passage in Somerset across the region to eastern Blair - 4 Fulton County. Cambria 18 5 Fulton 13 3 The counterpart to the Regional Projects, Huntingdon 15 5 County Projects connect places of county-level Somerset 27 5 significance to regional projects or to other parts Total 96 28 of the county. For example, the proposed Figure 5: Barronvale Covered Bridge Figure 8: Laurel Hill Greenway ii Southern Alleghenies Planning & Development Commission Executive Summary To The Grand Canyon LEGEND of Pennsylvania/ CLEARFIELD CENTRE Ansonia, PA Southern Alleghenies Regional Boundary County Boundary Susquehanna River SGL120 GALLITZIN STATE FOREST SNYDER ROTHROCK STATE FOREST Water Trail - West SUSQUEHANNA ROCK RUN Municipal Boundary RECRATION Glendale Branch ELDER AREA Lake READE SGL158 WARRIORS MARK WHIPPLE DAM W CHEST e C st PRINCE GALLITZIN Interstate Highway h TYRONE FRANKLIN e STATE PARK il Greenways Plan s a t r B k HASTINGS C WHITE T e r k JACKSON NORTHERNa e e r k e r e t n e CAMBRIA e a C c e SGL108 e t Cr Major Highway h r e k S BARREEr n C e to BIRMINGHAM e id v c a S GREENWOOD FURNACE S u M h g r n u SGL108 S i p d s ANTIS S n q Active Railroad PATTON k a u e SGL108 t e S WEST e WEST h r SPRUCE a C CARROLL BARR n d CREEK n l e a i Inactive Railroad f CLEARFIELD r SGL79 CARROLLTOWN a Greenway Network le BELLWOOD R ive C k r DEAN e TYRONE e River/Lake/Stream r EAST r C e LOGAN MILLER v CARROLL CHEST SGL184 i R DUMAN LAKE SPRINGS MORRIS Upper Juniata a k t PETERSBURG c a li PARK i TRAILS INDIANA n Water Trail k SGL267 c ASHVILLE u Preservation Corridors/Habitats - a J l B ALEXANDRIA le t Existing State/National it SGL322 h L c SGL166 SGL118 ONEIDA /Regional Trail n a MIFFLIN r ALLEGHENY PORTER SGL322 corridors intended to conserve the benefit J B u Proposed State/National n CAMBRIA i h GALLITZIN a t LOGAN CATHARINE r t HENDERSON a /Regional Trail o VALLEY VIEW PARK BLACKLICK R of environmental sections or biological N Ghost Town ALTOONA SGL112 i LORETTO v CAMBRIA e l To r i SGL79 Trail Water Trail Dilltown, PA a BLAIR HUNTINGDON r diversity areas; they generally do not EBENSBURG T SGL279 BRUSH RUN CANOE CREEK BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AREAS VINTONDALE GALLITZIN COUNTY PARK k SGL79 n NANTY GLO TUNNELHILL i SANKERTOWN un SGL118 SMITHFIELD
Recommended publications
  • Mid State Trail Association 2011 Product Order Form
    Mid State Trail Association 2011 Product Order Form Product Description Price Map 301-306 Covers Sections 1,2,3,4,5 & 6 - MD Border to PA 326 $9.00 (item # Map301) 2nd Crossing (30.3 km), Buchanan State Forest and SGL 97, Bedford County, Everett Region, 2nd PA 326 Crossing to SR 1004 (22.6 km), SGL 97, Bedford County, Everett Region, SR 1004 to PA 36 (30.9 km), Private Land and SGL 73, Bedford County, Everett Region (Map 303). PA 36 to PA 164 (20.6 km), SGL 73, Bedford/Blair/Huntingdon Counties, Everett Region, PA 164 to PA 866 (25.2 km), SGL 73, SGL 118, Blair/Huntingdon Counties, Everett Region, PA 866 to US 22, (18.3 km), Lower Trail, Williamsburg to Alfarata, Blair/Huntingdon Counties, Everett Region. Full Color water-proof map. Map 307-310 Covers Section 7, 8, 9, & 10 - US 22 to PA 26 (32.3 km), $9.00 (item # Map307) Rothrock State Forest, Huntingdon/Centre Counties, State College Region. PA 26 to Detweiler Junction (24.3 km), Rothrock State Forest, Huntingdon/Centre Counties, State College Region. Detweiler Junction to US 322 (16.4 km), Rothrock State Forest and Penn Roosevelt State Park, Centre/Huntingdon/Mifflin Counties, State College Region. US 322 to PA 45 (43.7 km), Bald Eagle State Forest and Poe Valley & Poe Paddy State Parks, Centre/Mifflin/Union Counties, State College Region. Full Color water-proof map. Map 311-316 Covers Section 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 & 16 - PA 45 to PA 192 $9.00 (item # Map311) (18.1 km), Bald Eagle State Forest, Centre/Union Counties, State College Region.
    [Show full text]
  • CENTRE COUNTY Recreation & Greenway Plan
    )" (! kh " (! ¤£ " ¨¦§ jg " (! ¨¦§ jg )" " )" ! jg (! ( jg (! jg jg jg " · )" ¨¦§ jg (! )" !|!M¾Ð " jg " jg )" " jg ²³ · " (! ÆQ ¤£ jg (! ¨¦§ jgn " (! (!jg jg jg jg jg · )" × ²³â kh!|â ²¸ " â !M n ·â (! â Greenways â jg ¨¦§ â ! â â ( jg !Mâ â â jg (! â CENTRE COUNTY Recreation & Greenway Plajgn: C×eâ ntre Reg¤£ ion â â â â â C7 - Spring Creek Canyon Greenway â !M â â â !| â â )" ÆI â · !M STATE GAME LANDS 103 · ù C30 - Halfmoon Wildlife Corridor(! Greenway T7 â (!(! (!â " C19 â â " C31 - Musser Gap Greenway T7 BOGGS TWP â jg jg (! â (! Pâleasant View â â WALKER TWP (! â R2 - Lewisburg and Tyrone Railroad Greenway â · ⠾Рjg â " !| Þ Þ R10 - Bellefonte Central Rail Trail Greenway ¾Ð Sunnyside n 550 jg !y ·××¾ÐnÆc × )" jg S-119 ¾Ð × kh ×n T3 !y ²¸²¸T××6 × j UNION TWP ÞÆc·(!ײ³Bellefonte (! Conservation Cojgrridors !( )" !M jg ²¸ · (! ²³kh¾Ð· Colevill·e × · C6 - Spr(!ing C·r·eek n !Ï!y · )" C8 - Buffal¾Ðo Run !y S-71 Unionville × jg ×C6 !M (! BLACK MOSHANNON SjTATE PARK Þ (! C28 - Spkh×ruce× Creek Valley View (! C29 - Slab Cabin Run RUSH TWP n C10 " n · ! C32 - Roaring Run !M( · kh SPRING TWP C33 - Gailbrlaith Gap jg jg Sp!kring Creek Axemann (! × Recreation Corridors !( ¤£220 · · × (! C27 !M )"26 R1 - Mid State Trail (! BENNER TWP Þ R9 - Colyer Lakjge to Tussey Mountain ¤£ R10 !k · MOSHANNONSTATE FOREST HUSTON TWP jg BALD EAGLE STATE FOREST R24 - Patton Woods/Haugh Farm ·! n )" ( Pleasant Gap × jg R25 - Arboretum Section of the Bellefonte Central Rail Trail R19 jg²³ )"150 )"144 (! (! Julian R26 - Musser Gap Greenway Connection · 99 !M
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating the MAPS Program Into Coordinated Bird Monitoring in the Northeast (U.S
    Integrating the MAPS Program into Coordinated Bird Monitoring in the Northeast (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5) A Report Submitted to the Northeast Coordinated Bird Monitoring Partnership and the American Bird Conservancy P.O. Box 249, 4249 Loudoun Avenue, The Plains, Virginia 20198 David F. DeSante, James F. Saracco, Peter Pyle, Danielle R. Kaschube, and Mary K. Chambers The Institute for Bird Populations P.O. Box 1346 Point Reyes Station, CA 94956-1346 Voice: 415-663-2050 Fax: 415-663-9482 www.birdpop.org [email protected] March 31, 2008 i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 3 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Collection of MAPS data.................................................................................................................... 5 Considered Species............................................................................................................................. 6 Reproductive Indices, Population Trends, and Adult Apparent Survival .......................................... 6 MAPS Target Species......................................................................................................................... 7 Priority
    [Show full text]
  • Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste D Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type D Award Allocatio Funding Types
    Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Alverthorpe Manor BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Cultural Park (6422) 11-3 11 Development $223,000 $136,900 Key - Community Abington Township TAP Trail- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township (1101296) 22-171 22 Trails $90,000 $90,000 Key - Community Ardsley Wildlife Sanctuary- BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Development 22-37 22 Development $40,000 $40,000 Key - Community Briar Bush Nature Center Master Site Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1007785) 20-12 20 Planning $42,000 $37,000 Key - Community Pool Feasibility Studies BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1100063) 21-127 21 Planning $15,000 $15,000 Key - Community Rubicam Avenue Park KEY-PRD-1- Region 1 Abington Township (1) 1 01 Development $25,750 $25,700 Key - Community Demonstration Trail - KEY-PRD-4- Region 1 Abington Township Phase I (1659) 4 04 Development $114,330 $114,000 Key - Community KEY-SC-3- Region 1 Aldan Borough Borough Park (5) 6 03 Development $20,000 $2,000 Key - Community Ambler Pocket Park- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Ambler Borough (1102237) 23-176 23 Development $102,340 $102,000 Key - Community Comp. Rec. & Park Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Ambler Borough (4438) 8-16 08 Planning $10,400 $10,000 Key - Community American Littoral Upper & Middle Soc/Delaware Neshaminy Watershed BRC-RCP- Region 1 Riverkeeper Network Plan (3337) 6-9 06 Planning $62,500 $62,500 Key - Rivers Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Valley View Park - Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Aston Township (1100582) 21-114 21 Development $184,000 $164,000 Key - Community Comp.
    [Show full text]
  • PRIMITIVE CAMPING in Pennsylvania State Parks and Forests 11/2014
    PRIMITIVE CAMPING in Pennsylvania State Parks and Forests 11/2014 What is Primitive Camping? Primitive camping is a simplistic style of camping. Campers hike, pedal or paddle to reach a location and spend the night without the presence of developed facilities. This primitive camping experience takes place off the beaten path, where piped water, restrooms and other amenities are not provided. You pack in all you need, exchanging a few conveniences for the solitude found in the back country setting. Fresh air, fewer people and out-of-the-way natural landscapes are some of the benefits of primitive camping. Once off the beaten path, however, additional advantages begin to surface such as a deeper awareness and greater appreciation of the outdoor world around you. Primitive camping also builds outdoor skills and fosters a gratifying sense of self-sufficiency. Where to Camp Pennsylvania has 2.2 million acres of state forest land with 2,500 miles of trails and 5,132 miles of Camping at rivers and streams winding through it. Hiking, biking and multi-use trails traverse most state forest districts and six districts have designated water trails that transect state forest land. Forest Districts State parks are not open to primitive camping. However, with the exception of William Penn State Forest, all state forest districts are open to this activity. Camping is not permitted in designated STATE FOREST DISTRICTS: natural areas or at vistas, trail heads, picnic areas and areas that are posted closed to camping. Bald Eagle State Forest (570) 922-3344 Contact a forest district office for specific information, maps and Camping Permits (if needed).
    [Show full text]
  • FALL FOLIAGE REPORT October 1 – October 7, 2020
    Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Bureau of Forestry PENNSYLVANIA WEEKLY FALL FOLIAGE REPORT October 1 – October 7, 2020 TIOGA CAMERON BRADFORD To predict peak season from the colors, use these guidelines: ➢ Dark Green/No Change= peak is three weeks to a month away ➢ Light Green/Starting to Change= peak is approximately two to three weeks away ➢ Yellow/Approaching Best Color= peak is approximately one week away ➢ Orange/Best Color= foliage is peaking this week ➢ Red/Starting to Fade= still some nice color but won’t last more than a few more days ➢ Brown/Past Peak= all or nearly all color is gone Statewide Fall Foliage Overview What a difference a week makes! Cold and frosty nights and very dry conditions have ushered in marked changes across the northern tier, where foliage is at its spectacular peak. Sugar and red maples are the stars of the show, contrasting beautifully with the still-green oak canopies. Another cold snap could jumpstart much of the Appalachian and Allegheny mountain regions, setting the table for back to back weeks of fantastic fall foliage viewing opportunities across wide swaths of the commonwealth. Northwestern Region The district manager in Cornplanter State Forest District (Warren, Erie counties) reports that cooler nights have spurred fall colors in northwest Pennsylvania. Many oaks are still quite green, but maples (sugar and red) are displaying brilliant colors. Aspen, hickory, and birch are continuing to color the landscape with warm yellow hues. Route 6 to Chapman State Park is a recommended fall foliage corridor in Warren County. Exciting fall color can be found at Chapman State Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Review the Commonwealth's Growing Greener II Initiative
    Legislative Budget and Finance Committee A JOINT COMMITTEE OF THE PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Offices: Room 400 Finance Building, 613 North Street, Harrisburg Mailing Address: P.O. Box 8737, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8737 Tel: (717) 783-1600 • Fax: (717) 787-5487 • Web: http://lbfc.legis.state.pa.us SENATORS JOHN R. PIPPY Chairman JAY COSTA, JR. WAYNE D. FONTANA ROBERT B. MENSCH DOMINIC PILEGGI JOHN N. WOZNIAK Review of the Commonwealth’s Growing Greener II Initiative REPRESENTATIVES ROBERT W. GODSHALL Secretary DAVID K. LEVDANSKY Treasurer STEPHEN BARRAR JIM CHRISTIANA H. SCOTT CONKLIN ANTHONY M. DELUCA As Required by House Resolution 2009-17 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PHILIP R. DURGIN March 2010 Table of Contents Page Summary .............................................................................................................. 1 I. Introduction ............................................................................................. 3 II. Growing Greener II Bond Issues and Debt Service ............................. 5 A. Bond Issues ............................................................................................ 5 B. Debt Service ............................................................................................ 6 III. Uses of Growing Greener II Funds ........................................................ 8 IV. Appendices .............................................................................................. 25 A. HR 2009-17 ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Outdoors Ec R the Keystone for Healthy Living Or Do Ut O E Iv Ns He 20 Pre 09– Om 2013 Statewide C
    lan n P tio rea Pennsylvania Outdoors ec R The Keystone for Healthy Living or do ut O e iv ns he 20 pre 09– om 2013 Statewide C www.paoutdoorrecplan.com lan into action. his p ut t o p e t ast d h an om isd w The preparation of this plan was financed in part through a Land and Water ith Conservation Fund planning grant and the plan was approved by the National Park k w Service, U.S. Department of the Interior under the provisions for the Federal Land or w and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (Public Law 88-578). uld We sho National Park Service – Joe DiBello, Jack Howard, David Lange and Roy Cortez September 2009 Contents Acknowledgements........................................................................................................2 Governor’s.Letter............................................................................................................3 Executive.Summary........................................................................................................4 Introduction.....................................................................................................................6 Public.Participation.Process.........................................................................................10 Research.and.Findings:.What.Pennsylvanians.Say.About.Outdoor.Recreation.........12 Goals.and.Recommendations.......................................................................................46 Funding.Needs.and.Recommendations....................................................................... 94
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Happy Places
    ( ) Finding Outside Insights from the People Who Know Pennsylvania’s State Parks and Forests DCNR.PA.gov 1845 Market Street | Suite 202 Camp Hill, PA 17011 717.236.7644 PAParksandForests.org Penn’s Woods is full of the kinds of places that make people happy. At the Pennsylvania Parks and Forests Foundation we discover this each year when we announce our annual Parks and Forests Through the Seasons photo contest and marvel as your breath-taking entries roll in. And we hear it every day when we talk to the hard-working men and women who earn their daily bread in one of the hundreds of different occupations throughout the parks and forests system. We see the pride they take in their work—and the joy they experience in being outside every day in the places we all love. On the occasion of this 2018 Giving Tuesday, we are delighted to share some of their favorite places. Maybe one of them will become your happy place as well! Visit DCNR.PA.gov for the state park or forest mentioned in this booklet. Drop us a line at [email protected] or visit our Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/PennsylvaniaParksAndForestsFoundation) and let us know what you find Out There. #PAParks&ForestsHappyPlace I’m drawn to rock outcroppings, hence my attraction to several hiking opportunities in the Michaux State Forest. Sunset Rocks Trail (https://www.purplelizard.com/blogs/news/ camp-michaux-and-sunset-rocks-history-vistas-and-more-in-michaux- state-forest), a spur to the Appalachian Trail, rewards the intrepid hiker with amazing views along a rocky spine.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Watersheds and Improving Water Quality for Future Generations
    VOLUME LVXI • SUMMER/FALL 2020 Restoring Watersheds and Improving Water Quality for Future Generations CONTENTS Message from the President The Importance of WPC’s Watershed Pennsylvania’s landscapes are defined by 3 Conservation Work dramatic rivers and many tens of thousands of miles of streams. One of the primary focuses of the WPC’s Land Protection Work in the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy’s mission is to 4 Laurel Highlands is Essential to Watershed Protection protect, and restore when needed, these rivers and streams across the region. Our rivers and streams Removing Manmade Barriers a provide beauty in our state’s fabulous landscape, 6 Key Strategy for Improving they provide places for recreation, and they serve Watershed Health many important ecological functions. The Importance of WPC’s Restoring Cherry Run from Historically, forest clearcuts had an impact 7 Abandoned Mine Drainage on Pennsylvania’s rivers and streams and their watersheds. Clearcuts from mining – with the Watershed Conservation Work School Rain Garden is an 10 Immersive Teaching Tool resulting abandoned mine discharge impacts we see so widely now – and from industry with Large Wood Projects Create its resulting pollutants had detrimental effects on the health of watersheds and their 12 “A Beautiful Mess” Helping ecosystems, as did alterations to rivers and streams from culverts, dams and changes Ecosystems Thrive to natural flow that were made in order to accommodate commerce and transportation. These impacts continue to varying degrees today, along with other issues such as Western Pennsylvania’s rivers and streams, and New High School STEM Partnership their associated watersheds, are still facing a 14 Teaches Students Aquatic Science streambank erosion and nutrient runoff from agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of PENNSYLVANIA's STATE PARKS 1984 to 2015
    i HISTORY OF PENNSYLVANIA'S STATE PARKS 1984 to 2015 By William C. Forrey Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Office of Parks and Forestry Bureau of State Parks Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Copyright © 2017 – 1st edition ii iii Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................................... vi INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. vii CHAPTER I: The History of Pennsylvania Bureau of State Parks… 1980s ............................................................ 1 CHAPTER II: 1990s - State Parks 2000, 100th Anniversary, and Key 93 ............................................................. 13 CHAPTER III: 21st CENTURY - Growing Greener and State Park Improvements ............................................... 27 About the Author .............................................................................................................................................. 58 APPENDIX .......................................................................................................................................................... 60 TABLE 1: Pennsylvania State Parks Directors ................................................................................................ 61 TABLE 2: Department Leadership .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Brushwacker Spring 2002 the Rarely Regular News Publication of the Mid State Trail Association P.O
    The Brushwacker Spring 2002 The Rarely Regular News Publication of the Mid State Trail Association P.O. Box 167 Boalsburg, PA 16827 Upcoming meeting: June 3, 2002. See last page for details. lack of written easement or KTA ownership, and property owner/manager attitude or personnel changes. All this additional overlayed volunteer effort detracts greatly from other important trail building programs. The Endangered Hiking Trails (EHT) concept is intended to greatly increase US 322 Relocation awareness and support for long term health of PA Tom Kelliher — In the past few years the Mid hiking trails. SUPPORT is spreading the word to State Trail has taken more than it share of lumps bring wider awareness of the issue, individual from landowners and Commonwealth officials. We lobbying, volunteering for trail work, donation of can now report some good news. As a result of money, etc. expected future traffic problems east of State The KTA-EHT committee met on April 20, College, PENNDOT is planning a major upgrade 2002, and agreed to present the following to KTA to US 322, including relocating it from its current council as the INITIAL EHT suggestion for policy, alignment. More than two dozen new routes have CRITERIA, and LISTING (for media release, been under consideration by the South Central KTA Newsletter, etc.): Criteria for KTA-EHT Centre County Transportation Study (SCCCTS). listing are simply that an EHT has a significant Six of the proposed routes would have traversed portion on private land without written easement Rothrock State Forest, five would cross Penns or KTA ownership, and/or has actual severing, Valley, and one would use Black Hawk Gap to and/or enforcement is poor.
    [Show full text]