DOCSLIB.ORG

Survey Methodology Was Developed with Regard to the Commonwealth and State Guidelines Applicable to the Relevant Species and Involved

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Survey Methodology Was Developed with Regard to the Commonwealth and State Guidelines Applicable to the Relevant Species and Involved Survey methodology was developed with regard to the Commonwealth and State guidelines applicable to the relevant species and involved: Fish survey - the fish survey undertaken aimed to sample the broad range of fish species that could potentially inhabit the project study area and included methods to specifically target threatened species. Survey techniques included: – Box traps – box traps were baited and set for a minimum of two (2) hours within suitable habitats. A total of ten (10) traps were set within the project study area. Individual trap placement aimed to sample the variety of microhabitats (e.g. woody debris, root); – Fyke netting – fyke netting was conducted where water levels provided suitable trapping conditions. The net was set with the cod end attached to the bank with the wings of the net outstretched and staked into the substrate (Plate 2-1). The fyke net was set overnight; and – Pool watches – pool watches were conducted within each aquatic habitat assessment site. Watches were a minimum of 30 search minutes in duration. Turtle survey - ten cathedral traps were baited with beef heart and set within the project study area. Traps were set for approximately 18 hours and checked twice during this period. Trapping targeted key habitat areas such as undercut banks and submerged woody debris. Bank margins within the project study area were also assessed for nesting habitat suitability; Platypus survey - suitability of the project study area for platypus habitat was assessed through habitat assessment and identification of banks potential suitable for burrows. Thirty minute pool watches were also undertaken within each habitat assessment site; and Opportunistic observations of aquatic fauna species were also undertaken within the project study area during the field survey event. Note – high water levels and poor visibility within the project study area prevented the inclusion of electrofishing and snorkelling as part of the field survey techniques. The survey techniques that were implemented are considered suitable for the purpose of identifying environmental values and potential project impacts. The exclusion of electrofishing and snorkelling is not considered to have impacted the likelihood of occurrence assessment for conservation significant species. The target surveys for aquatic fauna species builds on the surveys conducted within the project study areas by Central Queensland University in 2011 (Wormington and Black 2011). 2.2.5 Qualifications The results of the field survey are based on a single sampling event undertaken in February 2016. Field surveys aimed to identify the presence of terrestrial and aquatic environmental values within the project study area and were not designed to determine population abundance or density. The likelihood of occurrence of species not recorded during the field survey event is based on an assessment of habitat conditions/suitability and information identified during the desktop assessment. Habitat assessment, species profiles and hydrological information has been used to provide an understanding of the seasonal variability in the environment. 10 | GHD | Report for Department of Transport and Main Roads - Coondoo Creek Bridge Replacement, 41/29634 Plate 2-1 Turtle cathedral traps within the project study area 2.3 Likelihood of occurrence assessment The potential for species of conservation significance (listed as critically endangered, endangered, vulnerable, near threatened or special least concern under the EPBC Act and/or NC Act) to be present within the project study area was determined based on a likelihood of occurrence assessment. Conservation significant species identified during the desktop assessment were assessed using the following categories: Unlikely to occur: species has not been recorded in the desktop search extent and/or current known distribution does not encompass the project study area and/or suitable habitat is generally lacking from the project study area; May occur: species has not been recorded in the desktop search extent although species’ distribution incorporates the project study area and potentially suitable habitat occurs in the project study area (but may not be particularly abundant or optimal habitat); Likely to occur: species has been recorded in the desktop search extent and suitable habitat is present in the project study area (species determined to be ‘likely to occur’ are otherwise known to occur within the project study area or surrounding landscape, and has suitable habitat present; however were not recorded during field surveys); and Confirmed present: species recorded during field surveys in the project study area. GHD | Report for Department of Transport and Main Roads - Coondoo Creek Bridge Replacement, 41/29634 | 11 3. Existing ecological values 3.1 Mary River catchment The project study area is located within the lower Mary River drainage sub-basin, which has a total area of 6,758 square kilometres (km2) (DEHP 2016) (Figure 1-1). Major towns within the sub-basin include Gympie, Kilkivan, Maryborough and Tiaro (DEHP 2016). Coondoo Creek is a fifth order tributary that flows into the Mary River via Tinana Creek. The Mary River discharges into the Great Sandy Strait, approximately 110 km downstream from the project construction footprint. The Great Sandy Strait is a Wetland of International Importance (Ramsar wetland). Land use is dominated by state forest pine plantations. Queensland DAF has identified Coondoo Creek is an important waterway for fish passage and as such, the presence of an artificial barrier has the potential to have a major (purple) risk of impact on fish movement (Queensland Waterways for Waterway Barrier Works spatial layer; Figure 1-1). The design of temporary and permanent structures for the project must therefore consider potential impacts on fish movement. 3.2 Terrestrial habitat 3.2.1 Habitat description The existing environment within the project study area consists of mature riparian vegetation dominated by Melaleuca, Allocasuarina, Eucalyptus and Lophostemon species (Plate 3-1). The riparian vegetation associated with Coondoo Creek represents a large tract of remnant vegetation which provides fauna connectivity across the landscape. Toolara State Forest surrounds Coondoo Creek to the east and west of the project construction footprint (Figure 3-1). The dominant land use in the immediate surrounding area is plantation forestry of Pinus elliottii (slash pine). Road side maintenance and management of existing power easements appear to be the primary disturbances of fauna habitat, with a small amount of litter present and evidence of road drainage into adjacent habitats. Plate 3-1 Terrestrial habitat upstream (left) and downstream (right) of the existing Coondoo Creek bridge on Tin Can Bay Road 12 | GHD | Report for Department of Transport and Main Roads - Coondoo Creek Bridge Replacement, 41/29634 Terrestrial fauna habitat types present within the project study area, as described by GHD 2012, include: Riparian vegetation dominated by Melaleuca quinquenervia and Allocasuarina litoralis. Bank edges dominated by Lomandra longifolia (Plate 3-1) - upstream of the existing Coondoo Creek bridge; Riparian vegetation dominated by Melaleuca quinquenervia and Lophostemon suaveolens. Bank edges dominated by Lomandra longifolia (Plate 3-1) – downstream of the existing Coondoo Creek bridge; Non-riparian vegetation consisting of Allocasuarina open woodland, with edge effects from adjacent exotic pine plantation (Plate 3-2) - roadside vegetation on south-eastern side of Tin Can Bay Road; and Melaleuca swamp area (Plate 3-2) - patches of this habitat occur parallel to Coondoo Creek downstream of the existing bridge and south of the existing forestry track on the southern side of the road. The location of terrestrial habitats within the project study area are illustrated in Figure 3-1, while detailed terrestrial habitat descriptions are provided in Appendix B. Plate 3-2 Allocasuarina open woodland (left) and Melaleuca swamp (right) 3.2.2 Essential habitat The project construction footprint is mapped as containing essential habitat for two (2) NC Act listed threatened species; wallum froglet (Crinia tinnula) and wallum rocketfrog (Litoria freycineti) (Figure 3-1). The riparian habitat and Allocasuarina woodland within the project construction footprint contains limited suitable habitat for these species and no suitable breeding habitat occurs. The Melaleuca swamp habitat located adjacent to the project construction footprint (Figure 3-1), does provide suitable habitat for the wallum froglet and the species is considered likely to occur (refer to Section 3.5.3). The Melaleuca swamp provides suitable, although sub-optimal, habitat for the wallum rocketfrog and the species may occur. GHD | Report for Department of Transport and Main Roads - Coondoo Creek Bridge Replacement, 41/29634 | 13 483,250 483,400 483,550 483,700 483,850 484,000 484,150 484,300 484,450 484,600 7,125,600 7,125,600 NEERDIE STATE FOREST 2 OAD R Y Main view A NEERDIE STATE FOREST 1 B N A C IN T 7,125,450 TOOLARA STATE FOREST 7,125,450 5 4 GREAT SANDY NATIONAL PARK 1:150,000 3 2 Based on or contains data provided by the State of QLD (DNRM) 2016. 2 In consideration of the State permitting use of this data you acknowledge 7,125,300 and agree that the State gives no warranty in relation to the data 7,125,300 (including accuracy, reliability, completeness, currency or suitability) and accepts no liability (including without limitation, liability
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GYMPIE GYMPIE 0 5 10 Km
    Electoral Act 1992 N 2017 QUEENSLAND STATE ELECTORAL DISTRICT OF Boundary of Electoral District GYMPIE GYMPIE 0 5 10 km HERVEY Y W H BAY MARYBOROUGH Pioneers Rest Owanyilla St Mary E C U Bauple locality boundary R Netherby locality boundary B Talegalla Weir locality boundary Tin Can Bay locality boundary Tiaro Mosquito Ck Barong Creek T Neerdie M Tin Can Bay locality meets in A a n locality boundary R Tinnanbar locality and Great r a e Y Kauri Ck Riv Sandy Strait locality Lot 125 SP205635 and B Toolara Forest O Netherby Lot 19 LX1269 Talegalla locality boundary R O Gympie Regional Weir U Tinnabar Council boundary Mount Urah Big Sandy Ck G H H Munna Creek locality boundary Bauple y r a T i n Inskip M Gundiah Gympie Regional Council boundary C r C Point C D C R e a Caloga e n Marodian k Gootchie O B Munna Creek Bauple Forest O Glenbar a L y NP Paterson O Glen Echo locality boundary A O Glen Echo G L Grongah O A O NP L Toolara Forest Lot 1 L371017 O Rainbow O locality boundary W Kanyan Tin Can Bay Beach Glenwood Double Island Lot 648 LX2014 Kanigan Tansey R Point Miva Neerdie D Wallu Glen Echo locality boundary Theebine Lot 85 LX604 E L UP Glen Echo locality boundary A RD B B B R Scotchy R Gunalda Cooloola U U Toolara Forest C Miva locality boundary Sexton Pocket C Cove E E Anderleigh Y Mudlo NP A Sexton locality boundary Kadina B Oakview Woolooga Cooloola M Kilkivan a WI r Curra DE Y HW y BA Y GYMPIE CAN Great Sandy NP Goomboorian Y A IN Lower Wonga locality boundary Lower Wonga Bells Corella T W Cinnabar Bridge Tamaree HW G Oakview G Y
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Cultural Heritage of Noosa Shire - Report
    Historical Cultural Heritage of Noosa Shire - Report NOOSA COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLANNING The Noosa Plan SEPTEMBER 2002 Choosing Futures This document comprises a Planning Study prepared as part of the supporting documentation for The Noosa Plan: Choosing Futures process. It is intended to support a planning scheme that is consistent with the requirements of the Integrated Planning Act. Project: Historical Cultural Heritage Project Type: Cultural Historical Cultural Heritage of Noosa Shire: Report Authors: Raul Weychardt, Director Environment & Planning (5449 5266) Dr Ruth Kerr Peta Terry Citation Authors: Dr Ruth Kerr Dr David Hugo Rod Adams Aline Gillespie Irene Christie Source Documentation: Report: h:\planning scheme\planning studies\cultural heritage\historical report.doc Mapping: Citations Principal Themes At various scales prepared by Ian Lewis. Mapping prepared by Noosa Council for strategic planning purposes, with original mapping held in Noosa Council’s GIS. Accurate representation of boundaries over individual allotments cannot be guaranteed. Edited and reviewed by: Paul Summers, Manager Strategic Planning Rebecca Leyshan, Senior Strategic Planner Coordination & Final Documentation: Noosa Council Strategic Planning Section (07 5447 1553) Completion Date: September 2002 Status of Report:: Final endorsed by Council on 05/9/2002; Citations Edited October 2003 Acknowledgements: The project was commissioned by Noosa Council and co-ordinated by planning staff. Consultant historians led by Dr Ruth S. Kerr undertook the major work supporting the project. Dr Kerr managed the project for the period of investigation and compilation of material. Dr Kerr also prepared the Shire Overview and the thematic assessment. Local historians who focused on the citations were- Rod Adams Irene Christie Aline Gillespie Dr David Hugo Desley Armstrong of the Noosa Shire Library also gave valued assistance to the historians.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary River Environmental Values and Water Quality Objectives (Plan)
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! M A R Y R I V E R , I N C L U D I N G A L L T R I B U T A R I E S O F T H E R I V E! R ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Basin 138 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 152°E 152°20'E ! 152°40'E 153°E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! H E R V E Y B AY ! ! ! B ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Grego R ! ! ry i ! ! v u er ! ! ! ! ! ! ! r ! ! ! ! CORDALBA ! n ! ! ! ! ! WALKERS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! e ! ! ! POINT ! Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 2009 S ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! t ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! t t ! ! ! o ! ! Users must refer to plans WQ1372 k c ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! k ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! e ! y ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R ! r e a and WQ1402 for information on South-east Queensland Map Series ! r ! i d ! ! C v BURRUM
    [Show full text]
  • Gympie Regional Council Planning Scheme INDEX
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! F r a s e r C o a s t ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R e g i o n a l ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Gympie Regional Council Planning Scheme ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! C o! u n c i l ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! INDEX MAP ! ³ ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! N o r t h B u r n e t t ! ! ! ! F r a s e r C o a s t ! ! ! ! ! ! R e g i o n a l ! ! ! R e g i o n a l ! ! ! ! ! ! C o u n c i l ! ! ! ! F r a s e r C o a s t ! ! C o u n c i l ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R e g i o n a l ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! GREAT ! C o u n c i l ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! SANDY ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! STRAIT ! ! ! B ! ! ! O ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TUAN ! ! ! ! O ! ! ! ! ! N ! ! ! ! ! A ! TUAN!
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Statement for Traveston Crossing Dam (Mary River, Queensland): a Review with Regard for Species of Concern Under the EPBC Act 1999
    Environmental Impact Statement for Traveston Crossing Dam (Mary River, Queensland): A Review with regard for Species of Concern under the EPBC Act 1999 Report to the Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Canberra KF Walker Consultant in River and Floodplain Ecology PO Box 331, YANKALILLA 5203 Adjunct Associate Professor School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Adelaide www.sunwater.com.au November 2008 ii … This report may be cited as: Walker KF. 2008. Environmental Impact Statement for Traveston Crossing Dam (Mary River, Queensland): A Review with regard for Species of Concern under the EPBC Act 1999. Report to the Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Canberra. November 2008. xx+84p. iii Executive Summary Queensland Water Infrastructure (QWI) proposes to construct Traveston Crossing Dam on the Mary River as part of a strategy to meet anticipated water demands in south‐ eastern Queensland. This is the last high‐yield dam site available in the region, according to QWI, but it is also an extremely sensitive site in terms of significance for conservation. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been released for public comment, and a Supplement containing responses to submissions has also been issued. This review is concerned with the implications for a number of species listed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Act 1999 (EPBC Act), including three ‘iconic’ species, the Australian lungfish, Mary River cod and Mary River turtle. Context Ecologically Sustainable Development In many cases, the EIS makes assumptions on the basis of scant evidence and draws conclusions about impacts with little or no justification.
    [Show full text]
  • Gympie Regional Council Planning Scheme Bushfire Hazard Overlay
    INVESTIGATOR AVENUE Gympie Regional Council COOLOOLA COVE TOOLARA FOREST Planning Scheme R A AD IN H RO B OW BEAC Bushfire Hazard Overlay D R H C A E Development Constraints B T N I O Bushfire Hazard (High Risk Area) P D N Bushfire Hazard (Medium Risk Area) A L S I E L B Cadastre U O D DCDB ver. 05 June 2012 - H COOLOOLA A Suburb or Locality Boundary W E Local Government Boundary E T Waterbodies & Waterways Note - This map is adopted by Gympie Regional Council as a Natural Hazard Management Area GOOMBOORIAN (Bushfire) for the purpose of identifying areas of COUNTER ROAD Medium and High Bushfire Risk. D O A S R ME R O WILSONS POCKET Bushfire Hazard Overlay Disclaimer C The State of Queensland. Rural Fire Service, Queensland Fire and Rescue Authority 2001. O O L While every care is taken to ensure the accuracy of the this product, the Queensland Fire HOFF ROAD OO and Rescue Authority makes no representations or warranties about its accuracy, reliability, L A completeness or suitability for any particular purpose and disclaims all responsibility and W all liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for all expenses, A Y losses, damages (including indirect or consequential damages) and costs which you might K VERNE ROAD IN WOLVI incur as a result of the product being inaccurate or incomplete in any way and for any reason. K I N D R Disclaimer R OA Y While every care is taken to ensure the accuracy of this map, Gympie Regional Council AN D R makes no representations or warranties about its accuracy, reliability, completeness or A W O suitability for any particular purpose and disclaims all responsibility and all liability O A O (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for all expenses, losses, damage R D L (including indirect or consequential damage) and costs which might incur as a result S V E I of the data being inaccurate or incomplete in any way and for any reason.
    [Show full text]
  • Traveston Crossing Dam Stage 1
    Coordinator-General’s Evaluation Report Traveston Crossing Dam Stage 1 October 2009 Traveston Crossing Dam Stage 1 Contents Coordinator-General’s Evaluation Report: Synopsis ..............................................................................3 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................................15 1.1. The proponent ..........................................................................................................15 1.2. Project description ....................................................................................................15 1.3. Rationale for the Project ...........................................................................................18 1.4. Alternatives ...............................................................................................................23 2. The impact assessment process............................................................................................39 2.1. Commonwealth impact assessment.........................................................................39 2.2. State impact assessment..........................................................................................39 2.3. Terms of reference for EIS .......................................................................................40 2.4. Public notification of the EIS.....................................................................................40 2.5. Submissions received...............................................................................................41
    [Show full text]
  • South Pacific Ocean
    Gympie 152° 30' The Palms Widgee 152° 45' Coondoo 153° 00' 153° 15' 153° 30' Beenaam Valley Crossing Neusa Vale M a East Deep Creek SOURCES South ry Nahrunda This map has been compiled by Spatial Vision from data supplied by the Southside Monkland Cedar Pocket Como Australian Electoral Commission, Department of Natural Resources and Glastonbury Mines, Queensland Government, PSMA and Geoscience Australia. Scrubby Creek Other than the existing and proposed division boundaries, the data is Glanmire R provided by the PSMA, Geoscience Australia, and Department of Natural Pie Creek iv September 2017 er Resources and Mines, Queensland Government. Jones Hill COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA DISCLAIMER -26° 15' Marys Creek The Dawn Mothar Mountain This map has been compiled from various sources and the publisher Woondum and/or contributors accept no responsibility for any injury, loss or -26° 15' B Kin Kin McIntosh R damage arising from its use or errors or omissions therein. While all care U Lake Creek C is taken to ensure a high degree of accuracy, users are invited to notify of Long Flat E Cootharaba Noosa any map discrepancies. North Shore Lagoon Pocket © Commonwealth of Australia (2017) Tandur Boreen © State of Queensland (2017) Point Cootharaba Administrative Boundaries ©PSMA Australia Limited licensed by the Kybong Commonwealth of Australia under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 Upper Langshaw International licence (CC BY 4.0). Glastonbury Mooloo Calico Creek Gilldora This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the WIDE BAY Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without Map of the proposed Commonwealth electoral divisions of Dagun prior written permission from the Commonwealth.
    [Show full text]
  • Layout (Page 1)
    Maryborough 31km 60 70 80 Maryborough 36km 90 Tinnanbar 3km 5 00 000mE GREAT SANDY 10 20 RD 1234567152°40' C 152°50' Fraser Island 153°10' RD NATIONAL PARK Netherby C DR Tuan Forest 153°00' FRASER ISLAND A 1 For more information north of this map C Tinnanbar Sandy Talegalla WORLD HERITAGE AREA Redbank Weir see the Sunmap Regional Map Creek Access through GREAT SANDY HOFFMANS C RD private property WIDE BAY HARBOUR MAHOGANY CONSERVATION PARK RD RD Hook Point Sunmap Regional Map VA MARYBOROUGH LENTINE Creek CASSIA ‘Wide Bay - Burnett’ Big Angle Dinna Buttha RD RD 124 L V CONNOR Swan Hedleys For more detailed information north of this map RD BEHRENDORFF TALEGALLA CEDAR STRATHFORD see the Sunmap Regional Map TALEGALLA Numerous tracks TUAN STATE FOREST RD DR Black Kauri ‘Fraser Island’ Warning - Local beach RD MV Sarawak Creek ACACIA Creek MV Beagle Proctor speed limits apply. NETHERBY Mount Log Dump Bauple RD L TIN CAN BAY Inskip Point WILLETTS FORE RY Big Cooloola ST INSKIP 496 RD POINT MV Natone RD INSKIP PENINSULA Bauple FORESTRY Sugarloaf TINNANBAR MOUNT BAUPLE RD DR RFS RECREATION AREA SCALE 1 : 100 000 A NATIONAL PARK Pelican SS Dorrigo A (Scientific) Bay 0 2 4 6 8 10km Sandy Bullock RD Poona # KEENES C RD Creek Point RD Pannikin BULLOCK The Oaks Tinana Beach is trafficable RD Projection: Map Grid of Australia (MGA94) which is a standard Universal Tranverse Mercator (UTM) Little Island POINT No camping south Turkey in Zone 56 with Central Meridan 153°. The grid is shown as fine grey line at intervals of 5000 metres.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracks and Trails Plan (PDI022)
    Tracks and Trails Plan October 2014 Contents Glossary of terms ................................................................................. 1 Executive summary .............................................................................. 2 1.0 Background .................................................................................... 3 1.1 Preamble ............................................................................................................3 1.2 Purpose and aim of this plan .....................................................................3 1.3 Scope .................................................................................................................3 1.4 Methodology ...................................................................................................3 1.5 The Gympie regional profile – a snapshot............................................4 2.0 Benefits of trails ............................................................................. 5 2.1 Economic benefits ..........................................................................................5 2.2 Health and wellbeing benefits ..................................................................6 2.3 Education benefits .........................................................................................7 2.4 Liveability benefits .........................................................................................7 2.5 Environmental and cultural benefits .......................................................7 3.0 Trends
    [Show full text]
  • Road & Street Directory
    Road & Street Directory Gympie Regional Area Version 3 FOREWORD Welcome to the third edition of the Gympie Regional Area Road & Street Directory. The aim of this publication is to help residents and visitors to navigate the road network within the Gympie Regional Council Area. This is not intended to be Council’s “Roads Map” as defined in the Local Government Act 2009. Please note that the roads shown as unsealed do vary in standard, are not necessarily maintained by Council and may only be accessible by Four Wheel Drive vehicles. SOURCE INFORMATION This Road & Street Directory has been compiled by the Gympie Regional Council’s Design Services Division from information supplied by the Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines, and held within the Division. The Digital Cadastral Database (DCDB) dated at September 2012 has been used for road, lot and waterway boundaries. Please contact Council’s Design Division on (07) 5481 0622 for any further information or to notify Council of any errors or omissions. DISCLAIMER Gympie Regional Council Copyright © The State of Queensland Department of Natural Resource and Mines (2013) Please note that the accuracy of the information hereon is not guaranteed. The information is indicative and is meant only as a guide. You should therefore undertake your own site inspection to verify for yourself the information you are seeking. No liability is accepted by the Council for any error or omission or loss incurred by reliance being placed on the information contained on this directory. ESD-I-006
    [Show full text]
  • 2009-05-06 Planning & Development Committee Meeting Minutes
    MINUTES of the PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING CHAIRMAN: Cr Ian Petersen Held in the Boardroom Old Bank Building Cnr Nash & Channon Streets, Gympie Qld 4570 On Wednesday 6 May 2009 at 9.00 a.m. For Adoption at the General Meeting to be held on Wednesday 13 May 2009 Gympie Regional Council Planning & Development Committee Meeting – 6 May 2009 - 1 - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Cr I.T. Petersen (Chairman), Crs R.J. Dyne, G.L. Engeman, L.J. Friske, R.A. Gâté, D.R. Neilson, A.J. Perrett, J.A. Walker & J. Watt. APPOINTMENTS etc. Nil. CONTENTS LEAVE OF ABSENCE..........................................................................................................................................3 CONFIRMATION OF PREVIOUS MINUTES..................................................................................................3 APOLOGIES ..........................................................................................................................................................3 DECLARATION OF INTERESTS BY COUNCILLORS .................................................................................3 SECTION 1: STRATEGIC PLANNING MATTERS ........................................................................................4 1/1 STATE-WIDE HERITAGE SURVEY WITHIN THE GYMPIE REGIONAL COUNCIL AREA ...............................4 1/2 RELOCATION OPTIONS FOR NETBALL ....................................................................................................5 1/3 WIDE BAY BURNETT REGIONAL RECREATION AND SPORT STRATEGY ................................................11
    [Show full text]