Two Key Players in Britain's Hacking Trial

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Two Key Players in Britain's Hacking Trial INTERNATIONAL SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2013 Kenyan press up in arms over ‘draconian’ media bill NAIROBI: Kenya’s media reacted with has written away the media’s rights,” new bill will effectively hand the govern- also has the power to seize the property of shock and outrage yesterday after parlia- wrote the paper, a pillar of Kenya’s bur- ment “a stranglehold over the media”, an offender if a fine is not paid. ment voted through a bill that could see geoning and vibrant independent media. while The Standard said democracy and According to the Daily Nation, “even journalists and outlets slapped with huge “It is a frightening place, and it is valid to free speech in Kenya had been “dealt a one fine is enough to cripple most FM sta- fines for violating a code of conduct. In a ask: what is there to prevent Parliament major blow” and lambasted the bill as tions”. It also said the measures could late-night sitting Thursday, MPs voted to from simply sweeping away the inde- “draconian”. The passing of the bill comes have a devastating effect on what it set up and appoint a new pendence of the judiciary tomorrow?” the amid a string of measures to reinforce described as Kenya’s “lively blogosphere”. Communications and Multimedia Appeals paper said, challenging the bill as uncon- national security in the wake of the “By silencing the media, politicians know Tribunal with the teeth to impose penal- stitutional. September’s attack by Islamist gunmen on they can do whatever they like with ties of up to 20 million Kenyan shillings “This law is draconian and very puni- the Westgate shopping mall. impunity. No one will ever know,” wrote (173,000 euros, $234,000) on offenders tive and we reject it,” said Cyrus Kamau, Kenya media drew the ire of authorities Nation journalist Mutuma Mathiu, describ- and even bar journalists from working. managing director for Capital Group- by broadcasting security camera footage ing the Kenyan media as a key source of The bill, which is pending approval by home to CapitalFM, one of Kenya’s most of troops who were dispatched to the checks and balances in public life. President Uhuru Kenyatta, would also her- respected independent radio stations and scene of the attack purportedly robbing “Left to themselves, politicians would ald strict controls on radio and television news websites. He said the new media tri- the upmarket mall. bankrupt the country and take us back to broadcasts, with stations obliged to bunal “will always be biased because it’s Police chief David Kimaiyo reacted by hunting and gathering,” he wrote. Kenyan ensure that 45 percent of programme an extension of the government,” and that summoning two journalists and a media lawmakers have been the target of public content and advertising is locally-made. In restrictions on content and advertising executive for questioning, although the anger in the past. a furious attack on the bill, The Daily would damage Kenya’s place in the global summons was retracted following a media In May they voted to overturn cuts Nation newspaper said the bill “puts the economy. “I hope the president will listen outcry. Under the new bill, media houses ordered by the national salaries com- country in the same ranks with Zimbabwe, to us, and we appeal to him to reject this can be fined up to 20 million Kenyan mission and reinstate their hefty Cuba, Ethiopia and Kuwait” and had set bill and return it to the MPs,” he said. shillings and individual journalists up to salaries of around 532,000 shillings Kenya “firmly on the path of regression one million with the additional risk of (4,800 euros, around 6,200 dollars) a into the era of darkness.” ‘Stranglehold over the media’ being “de-listed”, or barred from receiving month tax-free-ranked among the “In one dramatic swoop, parliament According to The Star newspaper, the official press accreditation. The tribunal highest in the world. — AFP Israel ‘bombs’ Syria Two key players in Britain’s Continued from Page 1 criss-crossing the region to rally support for the so-called hacking trial ‘were lovers’ Geneva II talks. But Syria’s opposition has refused to attend unless President Bashar al-Assad’s resignation is on the table-a demand rejected by Damascus-and powerful rebel groups UK editor accused of hacking said ‘do his phone’ have warned that participants would be considered traitors. “If the opposition does not participate there will be no Geneva LONDON: Former News of the World editors conference,” Brahimi told reporters in Damascus before travel- Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson were hav- ling to Beirut. The veteran Algerian diplomat, who met with ing an affair for much of the time they were Assad on Wednesday, said his government had agreed to take allegedly involved in phone hacking at the part in the talks and that the opposition was “trying to find a Rupert Murdoch-owned tabloid, a London way to be represented”. court heard. Prosecutor Andrew Edis said The main opposition National Coalition plans to meet Thursday the affair, from 1998 to 2004, proved November 9 to decide whether to attend the Geneva talks, but “they trusted each other” and supported charges that they conspired to hack phones to key bloc member Syrian National Council threatened to quit if glean stories for the newspaper, which was it does so. Yesterday the Coalition criticized the Assad regime renowned for its celebrity scoops until for its “lack of courage to respond” to the reported Israeli Murdoch closed it in disgrace two years ago. strikes. “The Assad regime has managed to transform the Brooks edited the News of the World from Syrian army into a tool that kills the people rather than protect- 2000 to 2003, when her deputy Coulson took ing them, and that turns a blind eye against the (Israeli) ene- over as editor. A close confidante of my’s attacks,” it said. Murdoch’s, Brooks went on to become chief The reports of the Israeli strike came as the Organization for executive of his British newspaper operations the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons said all of Syria’s chemi- while Coulson became Prime Minister David cal arms were under “tamper proof” seals. Some 1,000 tons of Cameron’s media chief. Both Brooks and chemical agents and 290 tons of chemical weapons “have Coulson deny hacking and related allegations been placed under seals that are impossible to break,” OPCW in the high-profile trial at the Old Bailey in spokesman Christian Chartier said Thursday. London, which also involves six other defen- The OPCW also said Syria’s chemical arms production dants including Brooks’ current husband. equipment had been destroyed. Inspectors had until yester- Her affair with Coulson was revealed in a LONDON: Rebekah Brooks, former News International chief executive, and her day to destroy all production and filling equipment in accor- love letter dated February 2004 that was husband Charlie arrive for the phone-hacking trial at the Old Bailey court yes- dance with a timeline laid down by the OPCW and a UN found on her computer, the court heard. She terday. — AFP Security Council resolution. The resolution, stating that the apparently wrote it in response to Coulson’s arsenal must be destroyed by mid-2014, followed a US-Russian efforts to end the relationship. Both were we laugh and cry together. Mulcaire has since admitted phone hacking, deal to avert military strikes on Syria after chemical weapons married at the time-Brooks wed her first hus- “In fact without our relationship in my life I as has another member of the team, senior attacks near Damascus in August that killed hundreds of peo- band, actor Ross Kemp, in 2002. Coulson mar- am not sure I will cope.” The affair dominated journalist Greg Miskiw. ple. The West blamed those attacks on Assad’s regime, which ried in 2000 and has two children. Edis said he Britain’s newspapers yesterday, turning the Meanwhile, Andy Coulson, a former editor denied responsibility. made no “moral judgement” about the tables on a couple whose former paper was for Rupert Murdoch and Prime Minister David IHS Jane’s, a defense consulting firm, hailed the OPCW defendants, who sat next to each other in the renowned for exposing celebrity infidelities. Cameron’s ex-media chief, instructed one of his dock, Brooks’ head bowed and Coulson look- The Daily Telegraph, Guardian, Daily Mail and journalists involved in an exclusive story on a “milestone” but cautioned the work was far from over, noting ing towards the prosecutor. But the lawyer Independent all carried cover pictures of the well-known figure to “do his phone”, a London Syria’s entire arsenal was still under regime control. More than told the jury: “Mrs Brooks and Mr Coulson are couple, while the headline “Editors and court heard yesterday. Coulson, along with fel- 120,000 people have been killed in the 31-month rebellion charged with conspiracy, and when people lovers: couple at heart of hacking trial” low former News of the World editor Rebekah against the Assad regime triggered by his bloody crackdown are charged with conspiracy the first question topped the front-page of Murdoch title the Brooks, and two senior News International on Arab Spring-inspired democracy protests. On the battle- a jury has to answer is, how well did they Times. employees is accused of conspiring to hack field, regime troops battered rebel-held areas of southern know each other? How much did they trust phones. He and Brooks also face two charges Damascus to cut them off from rear bases in the countryside, each other? ‘Dog-eat-dog’ journalism each of making illegal payments to public offi- said the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.
Recommended publications
  • Before the Murdoch Takeover: New Evidence Indicating the Need for a Further “Fit and Proper” Review
    Before the Murdoch takeover: new evidence indicating the need for a further “Fit and Proper” review AVAAZ, 8th March 2017. Submission for Karen Bradley, Secretary of State for Culture Media and Sport Introduction An acquisition of Sky Plc. by 21st Century Fox (21CF) would result in a major expansion of the influence of the Murdoch Family Trust (MFT) over Sky. In 2012 Ofcom was highly critical of the role of James Murdoch who was CEO and Chairman of News International during the period of criminal and other reprehensible conduct at that organisation. This submission details a long list of wrongdoings and criminal misgovernance that has emerged since Ofcom reviewed the licenses held by BSkyB in 2012. It also draws attention to an unfolding sexual harassment epidemic being unearthed at Fox News in the US. The Secretary of State notes in her 6th March 2017 letter1 to 21CF and Sky that 21CF’s record of compliance with the broadcasting code might reflect on the culture or corporate governance at 21CF. The “huge failings of corporate governance” at News Corporation, the precursor company to 21CF were noted in the Culture, Media and Sport Committee on News International and Phone Hacking and the Secretary of State herself acknowledges that James Murdoch’s actions during this time was a “failure of corporate governance.” The shocking scale of corporate misgovernance and criminal conduct make it incumbent upon the Secretary of State to exercise her powers under Section 58(3) of the Communications Act 2003, to refer the Sky bid on broader public interest grounds than those she currently says she is minded to exercise.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2011 Bulletinprimary.Indd
    A PUBLICATION OF THE SILHA CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF MEDIA ETHICS AND LAW | SUMMER 2011 Not Just a ‘Rogue Reporter’: ‘Phone Hacking’ Scandal Spreads Far and Wide The so-called “phone hacking” scandal has led to more than Murdoch Closes News of the World and a dozen arrests, resignations by top News Corp. executives Speaks to Parliament while Public and British police, the launching of several new investigations Outrage Grows over Tabloid Crime, into News Corp. business practices, and pressured Murdoch to retreat from a business deal to purchase the remaining Collusion, and Corruption portion of BSkyB that he did not own. The U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) massive ethical and legal scandal enveloped the are reportedly conducting preliminary investigations into the Rupert Murdoch-owned British tabloid News of possibility of international law violations. The FBI is reportedly the World in the summer of 2011, leading to its investigating allegations that Murdoch journalists hacked into sudden closure. New allegations arose almost the phones of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks daily that reporters and private investigators or their families. British police have teamed up with Scottish Aillegally accessed the voice mail messages of politicians, authorities to continue investigating claims of phone hacking. celebrities, and private citizens. The revelations sparked Parliament launched a formal inquiry into the scandal and has worldwide public outcry and led to sweeping law enforcement questioned top News Corp. offi cials including Rupert Murdoch investigations directed at top editors of the paper, executives and his son, James Murdoch.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Aide to British PM Criminally Charged in Murdoch Phone-Hacking Scandal
    World Socialist Web Site wsws.org Former aide to British PM criminally charged in Murdoch phone-hacking scandal By Robert Stevens 25 July 2012 Former editors Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson He was forced to resign in January last year as further are among eight people facing criminal prosecution for details of his alleged involvement in phone hacking by their involvement in the News of the World phone News International continued to emerge. hacking scandal. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) The Labour Party is likewise in crisis over the phone announced yesterday that they are to appear in court hacking scandal. All the illegal acts attributed to the after being charged with 19 offences. eight defendants were allegedly carried out during the TheNews of the World was published by Rupert period 1997-2010, when the Labour governments of Murdoch’s News International, the British subsidiary Tony Blair and Gordon Brown maintained intimate of News Corp. The others charged are former contact with Murdoch’s publishing empire. Brooks is a managing editor Stuart Kuttner, former news editor friend of leading figures in the Labour Party, including Greg Miskiw, former assistant editor Ian Edmondson, former Prime Minister Blair and his wife Cherie. former chief reporter Neville Thurlbeck, former Blair’s successor, Gordon Brown, attended her 2009 assistant editor James Weatherup and private wedding to Charlie Brooks, alongside Cameron. investigator Glenn Mulcaire. They are all due to appear In a statement, Brooks denied the charges against her at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on 16 August. and claimed she “did not authorise, nor was I aware of, The charging of Brooks and Coulson is a major phone-hacking under my editorship.” Coulson said he political crisis for the Conservative-led government of would fight the charges.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward-V-Associated Newspaper Judgment
    Neutral Citation Number: [2021] EWHC 641 (QB) Case No: QB-2019-003661 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION MEDIA & COMMUNICATIONS LIST Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 18 March 2021 Before : THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE NICKLIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : Michael Ward Claimant - and - Associated Newspapers Ltd Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The Claimant appeared in person Andrew Caldecott QC and Clara Hamer (instructed by Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP) for the Defendant Hearing date: 18 December 2020 Further written submissions: 21 December 2020, 13 January 2021 and 2-3 February 2021 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Covid-19 Protocol: This judgment was handed down by the judges remotely by circulation to the parties’ representatives and BAILII by email. The date of hand-down is deemed to be as shown above. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE NICKLIN Ward -v- ANL (No.2) Approved Judgment The Honourable Mr Justice Nicklin : 1. This is the second substantial interim application with which the Court has had to deal in this case before even a Defence has been served. The hearing took almost a day, and further written submissions were submitted after the hearing. Mr Ward, the Claimant, is acting in person. He has dealt, admirably, with a further comprehensive attack on his statement of case, renewed by a new Leading Counsel instructed by the Defendant. Save in the limited respects identified below, this further attack has been unsuccessful. History 2. The nature of Mr Ward’s claim, the statement upon which he sues, and the history to the litigation is set out in the judgment given on 5 October 2020 [2020] EWHC 2797 (QB) (“the First Judgment”).
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court Strikes Down Stolen Valor
    A PUBLICATION OF THE SILHA CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF MEDIA ETHICS AND LAW | SUMMER 2012 Supreme Court Strikes Down Stolen Valor Act In an 18-page opinion joined by Chief Justice John Roberts Congress already working on new bills to and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor, Kennedy wrote that because the Stolen Valor Act restricted outlaw lying about military medals speech based on its content, it was “presumed invalid” and therefore the government bore the burden of proving its n a June 28, 2012 ruling that struck down a federal law constitutionality. Content-based restrictions on speech have known as the “Stolen Valor Act,” U.S. Supreme Court historically only been permitted when they fall into a few Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that “the remedy categories, including that which advocates and is likely to for speech that is false is speech that is true,” not incite “imminent lawless action,” obscenity, libel, “fi ghting government suppression, even when the speech “can words,” fraud, “true threats,” and “speech presenting some Idisparage, or attempt to steal, honor that belongs to those who grave and imminent threat the government has the power fought for this nation in battle.” to prevent,” Kennedy explained. “Absent from those few United States v. Alvarez was a case challenging 18 U.S.C. categories,” Kennedy wrote, “is any general exception to §§704 (b)(c), a federal statute passed in 2006 which made the First Amendment for false statements.” United States v. lying about receiving military awards or medals, especially the Alvarez, 132 S. Ct. 2537 (June 28, 2012) Congressional Medal of Honor, a crime punishable by a fi ne and In defense of the statute, the government cited several up to a year in jail.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Standards, Privacy and Libel
    For Distribution to CPs House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport C o m m itte e Press standards, privacy and libel Second R eport o f Session 2009-10 V o l u m e I Report, together w ith form al m inutes Ordered by the House o f Commons to be printed 9 February 2010 HC 362-1 Incorporating HC 275-i-xv, Session 2008-09 Published on 24 February 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 5 2 6 MODI 00045526 For Distribution to CPs The Culture, Media and Sport Committee The Culture, Media and Sport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mr John Whittingdale MP {Conservative, M aldon and East Chelm sford) (Chairman) Mr Peter Ainsworth MP {Conservative, East Surrey) Janet Anderson MP {Labour, Rossendale and Darwen) Mr Philip Davies MP {Conservative, Shipley) Paul Farrelly MP {Labour, Newcastle-under-Lym e) Mr Mike Hall MP {Labour, W eaver Vale) Alan Keen MP {Labour, Feltham and Heston) Rosemary McKenna MP {Labour, Cum bernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) Adam Price MP (Plaid Cym ru, Carm arthen East and Dinefw r) Mr Adrian Sanders MP (Liberal Democrat, Torbay) Mr Tom Watson MP {Labour, W est Brom wich East) The following members were also members of the committee during the inquiry: Mr Nigel Evans MP {Conservative, Ribble Valley) Helen Southworth MP {Labour, W arrington South) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152.
    [Show full text]
  • Various V NGN Judgment
    Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWHC 961 (Ch) Case No: Various IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Rolls Building, Fetter Lane London EC4A 1NL Date: 28/04/2016 Before : MR JUSTICE MANN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : Various Claimants Claimants - and - News Group Newspapers Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr David Sherborne and Mr Julian Santos (instructed by Hamlins LLP) for the Claimants Mr Antony White QC, Mr Antony Hudson QC and Mr Ben Silverstone (instructed by Linklaters LLP) for the Defendant Hearing dates: 13th & 14th April 2016 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic. ……………… MR JUSTICE MANN MR JUSTICE MANN Various v NGN Approved Judgment Mr Justice Mann : Introduction 1. These are two partially matching applications relating to some of the claims made against the defendant (NGN) alleging phone hacking and other unlawful activities in relation to several claimants, though the impact of the applications is capable of being felt in an unknown number of cases which might be launched in the future. Putting the matter shortly, the position is as follows. Like many other claimants before them, 4 claimants seek to make claims about such activities against NGN as proprietor of the former News of the World newspaper. There is no problem about that in these applications, though I have previously ruled on whether they are entitled to plead the full extent of wrongdoing that they sought to rely on. They also seek to make claims against the Sun newspaper, of which NGN is also the proprietor.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Standards, Privacy and Libel
    House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee Press standards, privacy and libel Second Report of Session 2009–10 Volume I EMBARGOED ADVANCE COPY Not to be published in full, or in part, in any form before 00:01 hrs GMT on Wednesday 24 February 2010 HC 362-I House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee Press standards, privacy and libel Second Report of Session 2009–10 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 9 February 2010 EMBARGOED ADVANCE COPY Not to be published in full, or in part, in any form before 00:01 hrs GMT on Wednesday 24 February 2010 HC 362-I Incorporating HC 275-i–xv, Session 2008–09 Published on 24 February 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 EMBARGOED UNTIL 00:01 HRS GMT ON WEDNESDAY 24 FEBRUARY 2010 The Culture, Media and Sport Committee The Culture, Media and Sport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mr John Whittingdale MP (Conservative, Maldon and East Chelmsford) (Chairman) Mr Peter Ainsworth MP (Conservative, East Surrey) Janet Anderson MP (Labour, Rossendale and Darwen) Mr Philip Davies MP (Conservative, Shipley) Paul Farrelly MP (Labour, Newcastle-under-Lyme) Mr Mike Hall MP (Labour, Weaver Vale) Alan Keen MP (Labour, Feltham and Heston) Rosemary McKenna MP (Labour, Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) Adam Price MP (Plaid Cymru, Carmarthen East and Dinefwr) Mr Adrian Sanders MP (Liberal Democrat, Torbay) Mr Tom Watson MP (Labour, West Bromwich East) The following members were also members of the committee during the inquiry: Mr Nigel Evans MP (Conservative, Ribble Valley) Helen Southworth MP (Labour, Warrington South) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Was Hacked? an Investigation Into Phone Hacking and Its Victims Part I: News of the World
    Who was hacked? An investigation into phone hacking and its victims Part I: News of the World March 2015 Martin Moore Cover photo courtesy of tommyslawyer.co.uk Report first published March 2015 Written by Martin Moore Additional research by Felix Tomlinson For comments and corrections please contact the author at [email protected] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- ShareAlike 4.0 International License. CONTENTS Summary 3 Introduction 4 1. Methodology 6 6 7 Phone hacking - available evidence 8 Phone hacking victims –limitations of the evidence The Mulcaire Papers Mulcaire – one of many engaged in hacking phones 11 2. NumberPhone ofhacking Victims – one of many methods 1613 Total number 16 3. Types of Victim 21 Identifying the victims 18 Identifying types of hacking victims 21 Non-Public Figures 26 Partners & ex-partners Families Friends Professional connections Victims of crime/tragedy Police Journalists Agents Lawyers Random targets Public Figures 34 Entertainment & Music Sports Politics Unions Home Office & Metropolitan Police Royalty and Royal Household Conclusion Witness Protection Programme 43 Appendix 45 Who Was Hacked? An investigation into phone hacking and its victims (Part 1) 2 SUMMARY News of the World Police estimate that 5,500 people were ‘likely’ or ‘potential’ victims of phone hacking. This figure may rise as new evidence comes to light. Due to the incomplete,News of the inconclusive World and sometimes incoherent nature of the evidence, we will never know exactly how many people were hacked by the . Phone hacking was one of a range of methods of gathering personal information, and was often one of the less directly intrusive.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 554 3 December 2012 No. 79 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 3 December 2012 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2012 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 569 3 DECEMBER 2012 570 Matthew Hancock: I warmly welcome the Richard House of Commons report, which stresses the need for rigour in apprenticeships and for apprenticeships to be more employer focused. I am studying it in great detail. The hon. Gentleman says Monday 3 December 2012 that apprenticeships need to be for a minimum of a year, and in almost all cases that is already happening, thanks to changes introduced by my predecessor, but The House met at half-past Two o’clock we want to look at all the recommendations and see which we can implement. PRAYERS Mr James Gray (North Wiltshire) (Con): I welcome some of the things the Minister said to the hon. Member for Hartlepool (Mr Wright) about engineering, but is he [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] not concerned that Sir James Dyson—Dyson engineering is based in my constituency—said last week that he needs 200 new designers and engineers in Malmesbury alone but cannot find them and that across the nation Oral Answers to Questions we are desperately short of them. What will we do to improve science, engineering and design in our schools and universities? EDUCATION Matthew Hancock: Not only is the number of engineering apprenticeships up, but a higher proportion of young people are now starting STEM—science, technology, The Secretary of State was asked— engineering and maths—degrees at university.
    [Show full text]
  • UNCORRECTED TRANSCRIPT of ORAL EVIDENCE to Be Published As HC 903-Ii
    UNCORRECTED TRANSCRIPT OF ORAL EVIDENCE To be published as HC 903-ii HOUSE OF COMMONS ORAL EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE THE CULTURE, MEDIA AND SPORT PHONE HACKING TUESDAY 19 JULY 2011 RUPERT MURDOCH and JAMES MURDOCH REBEKAH BROOKS Evidence heard in Public Questions 151 - 580 USE OF THE TRANSCRIPT 1. This is an uncorrected transcript of evidence taken in public and reported to the House. The transcript has been placed on the internet on the authority of the Committee, and copies have been made available by the Vote Office for the use of Members and others. 2. Any public use of, or reference to, the contents should make clear that neither witnesses nor Members have had the opportunity to correct the record. The transcript is not yet an approved formal record of these proceedings. 3. Members who receive this for the purpose of correcting questions addressed by them to witnesses are asked to send corrections to the Committee Assistant. 4. Prospective witnesses may receive this in preparation for any written or oral evidence they may in due course give to the Committee. 1 Oral Evidence Taken before the Culture, Media and Sport on Tuesday 19 July 2011 Members present: Mr John Whittingdale (Chair) Dr Thérèse Coffey Damian Collins Philip Davies Paul Farrelly Cathy Jamieson Alan Keen Louise Mensch Mr Adrian Sanders Jim Sheridan Mr Tom Watson Examination of Witnesses Witnesses: Rupert Murdoch, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, News Corporation, and James Murdoch, Chairman, News International, gave evidence. James Murdoch: Mr Chairman, I have a procedural question, if it pleases you. Our understanding was that we would be afforded the opportunity to make an opening statement, and we prepared on that basis.
    [Show full text]
  • CORRESPONDENCE with MORRISON FOERSTER 2014‐16 Part 1
    CORRESPONDENCE WITH MORRISON FOERSTER 2014‐16 Part 1 Letter from Morrison Foerster to the Chair of the Committee of Privileges, 30/10/2014 Letter from the Acting Clerk of the Committee of Privileges to Morrison Foerster, 12/12/2014 Letter from Morrison Foerster to the Chair of the Committee of Privileges, 19/12/2014 Letter from the Clerk of the Committee of Privileges to Morrison Foerster, 23/12/2014 Letter from Morrison Foerster to the Clerk of the Committee of Privileges, 24/12/2014 Letter from the Clerk of the Committee of Privileges to Morrison Foerster, 19/01/2015 Letter from the Clerk of the Committee of Privileges to Morrison Foerster, 23/01/2015 Letter from Morrison Foerster to the Clerk of the Committee of Privileges, 26/01/2015 Letter from the Clerk of the Committee of Privileges to Morrison Foerster, 28/01/2015 Letter from Morrison Foerster to the Clerk of the Committee of Privileges, 28/01/2015 Letter from Morrison Foerster to the Clerk of the Committee of Privileges, 2/02/2015 Letter from the Clerk of the Committee of Privileges to Morrison Foerster, 3/02/2015 Letter from Morrison Foerster to the Clerk of the Committee of Privileges and evidence, 5/02/2015 Letter from the Clerk of the Committee of Privileges to Morrison Foerster, 12/02/2015 Letter from the Clerk of the Committee of Privileges to Morrison Foerster, 13/02/2015 Letter from the Clerk of the Committee of Privileges to Morrison Foerster, 19/02/2015 Letter from Morrison Foerster to the Clerk of the Committee of Privileges, 24/02/2015 Letter from Morrison Foerster
    [Show full text]