II. Notes on the Life of Thomas Hainborowe, Officer in the Army and Navy in the Service of the Parliament of England

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

II. Notes on the Life of Thomas Hainborowe, Officer in the Army and Navy in the Service of the Parliament of England II. Notes on the Life of Thomas Hainborowe, Officer in the Army and Navy in the service of the Parliament of England. By EDWARD PEACOCK, Esq. E.S.A. Eead December 14, 1876. THE want of a really good biographical dictionary of Englishmen is, perhaps, more felt by those whose vocation it is to investigate the details of the great civil war of the seventeenth century than by students of any other class. The fame of three or four of the leading spirits of the time has eclipsed in the common memory almost all the other people who took an important part in the struggle between Charles the First and his Parliament. Such must be in a great degree the case whenever the dramatic interest of the story centres in the actions of one commanding intellect or the misfortunes and errors of a single sufferer ; but there is, we believe, no other great crisis in modern history where the less known have been permitted to remain so entirely unknown as the time of which we speak. Thomas Rainborowe, or, as printed books commonly give his name, Rains- borough, has not found his way into our biographical literature, and in the popular histories of the period there is little recorded concerning him save his tragic death. Yet his was a well-known name to contemporaries, and evidence survives to prove that he was one of the most active and energetic of the officers in the service of the Long Parliament; and, furthermore, that, when the split had taken place between the Presbyterians and Independents, he was regarded, alike by foes and allies, as one of the most important members of the latter party. Of his family and ancestors we do not know much. They certainly ranked as gentle, but were probably of little note or distinction. His grandfather, also called Thomas, was the first of the line who has, as far as we have been able to discover, left any record of himself behind him. He was a sailor, and dwelt at Greenwich ; but he possessed a not inconsiderable leasehold estate at Claver- hambury, in Essex, held under " the Right Honourable Edward Lord Denny, VOL. XLVI. c 10 Notes on the Life of Thomas Rainborowe. Baron of Waltham holy Crosse."a It has been suggested that he or his immediate ancestor may have been a Bavarian Protestant exile, but the only ground for the idea is the similarity of his name as commonly spelt with Raynesbury," the old English form of Regensburg, that is, Ratisbon. That foreign settlers in this country sometimes took to themselves surnames from the places from whence they came is probable, could be proved, indeed, if the investigation were worth the labour, which it is not on this occasion, for there seems here nothing but similarity of sound to give countenance to the conjecture that they were not of English blood except the fact that neither the name of Rainborowe, nor any spelling into which it could easily have been corrupted, or of which it might well be a corruption, occurs in any English name-list earlier than the seventeenth century that we have had the opportunity of consulting, and that Johannes Reynberg is mentioned in 1351 as one of the " mercators de hansa Alemannie " in Die Recesse und andere Akten der Sansetage, i. 83. The Rainborowes were, it has also been imagined, of Dutch extraction, and kinsmen or namesakes of a certain ambassador from the Seven United Provinces to Charles I., who is sometimes called Rainsborough.0 The ambassador's real name was John Van Reede, and he was Lord of Renswoude/ and consequently commonly called after his domain, a name quite sufficiently like Rainborowe to account for the mistake. There are two fine medals of him by Simon, on which his titles occur.6 That the Rainborowes were an English family is, if not proven, made highly probable by the arms they bore, which are almost identical with those attributed in the romance to Guy of Warwick and his son Rainburn. " Capten Ransbrowe " bore : Checquy or and azure, a Moor's head proper, wreathed argent, bearded sable/ and Thomas Rainborowe, the Parliamentarian. Colonel, sealed his letters with a signet-ring bearing this coat. The shield of a Will of Tho. Rainborowe, dated 4 December, 1622, as quoted in the will of his wife, Margaret, dated 29 November, 1626, in Archiepisc. Eeg. Cant. b Bayle's Select Works, pp. 449, 525. c Whitelock, p. 148. a Johan van Eeede, Lord of Eenswoude, son of Gerard van Reede, Lord of Nederhorst, by his wife, Machteld van Dirt, born in 1593. In 1611 he was " chanoine," and in 1620 dean of the chapter of Utrecht. In 1623 he bought the seignieury of Renswoude. He was many times a member of the States General of the United Provinces, and frequently employed in embassies. In 1644 he was despatched with Boreel and Joachimi to England with instructions to mediate between the King and the Parliament. He died in February 1682, leaving eight children by his wife Jacoba.—From information furnished by Dr. M. F. A. G. Campbell, Royal Librarian, the Hague. e These medals were executed in 1645 and 1672. See Medallic History of England, pi. xxiv. 4; Vertue, Medals, &c. by Simon, pi. xxii.; Van Loon, ii. 274, iii. 125. Specimens of both are in the British Museum. f Heralds' Coll. Miscell. Grants, iv. 89. Notes on the Life of Thomas Hainborowe. 11 Guy of Warwick, after his assumption of pilgrim's weeds, is represented as bearing Checquy or and azure, a man's head affronte, filleted argent. It is the head of Colbrand, the Danish giant, whom he had slain. Rainburn, Raiburn, or Sir Raynbrown, was Guy's son, and he is said to hare borne the above coat quartered with other imaginary ones.a There is no reason for doubting that Rainborowe is one of the many English family names that have been assumed or given from the possession or home of the family. There is a Rainsbarrow in Cumberland, and a Rainsborough Camp near Charlton in Oxfordshire.11 Thomas Rainborowe, the sailor, had two sons, Thomas, probably an armourer in the city, and William, who seems to have been brought up to the sea. Though not, apparently, in the constant employment of the Crown, William Rainborowe was frequently engaged in the public service, and often consulted when advice on naval matters was required. Lord Clarendon tells us that he was "an eminent commander at sea,"c a compliment which he probably received from having suc- cessfully commanded the English fleet which was sent to attack the Sallee pirates in 1637. His naval instructions on that occasion and several of his letters con- cerning the business are preserved among the State Papers.d There is also a curious journal of the expedition, in the form of a quarto tract, by a certain John Dunton, entitled, " A true journall of the Sally Meet with the proceedings of the voyage, whereunto is annexed a list of the Sally Captives' names, and the places where they dwell." London, 1637. William Rainborowe's conduct in this expedition was thought very praiseworthy, for the King proposed to knight him, but he declined the honour; therefore an order issued that a gold chain and medal should be given to him worth 300Z.e In 1627 we find William Rainborowe living at Wapping, and petitioning with others against the noxious smell of the alum-works there/ In 1640 he was chosen a Member of the Long Parliament for the town of Aldborough, in Suffolk, and on the 12th of December of that year "Mr. Treasurer and Capt. Rains- borow " were appointed to represent to the King that ten sail of Turkish pirates were harassing our western coasts, and to urge upon the King that two ships then riding in the Downs should be forthwith sent to scour the seas.g He never could have taken a very active part in the proceedings of that assembly, for on 14th of February, 1642, a warrant issued for a new writ because his seat had become vacant by death." a Row's Roll, 22, 23. b Fraser's Mag. February 1877, p. 169 ; Proc. Soc. Ant. 2d S. i. 324. c Ed. 1843, chap. xi. 646. a Stat. Pap. Dom. Car. I. vols. cccxxxyii.-cccxxxix. e Stafford's Letters, ii. 129. f Stow's Surrey of London, ed. Strype, 1755, ii. 41. « Com. Jour. ii. 50. h Ibid. ii. 429. c2 12 Notes on the Life of Thomas Rainborowe. "William Rainborowe left at his death several sons and daughters. We are only concerned with Thomas, who was probably the eldest. He, like his father, was a seaman, and there are several obscure notices in the pamphlets and news- papers of the time indicating that he had, before the breaking out of the Civil war, become known as a man serviceable in nautical affairs. Clarendon, who was no admirer of his, says of him that " he had been bred to the sea, and was the son of an eminent commander lately dead." a Perhaps he had gained experience under his father in the African expedition; no record of the fact, if it were so, has yet been discovered. The fisrt time he emerges into daylight is in 1640, when we find him elected member for the borough of Droitwich. There is little evidence that he gave attention to his parliamentary duties in the earlier days of that assembly. After the war-storm had burst it is certain that he was almost constantly occupied in military or naval service.
Recommended publications
  • The Merry Adventures of Robin Hood of Great Renown in Nottinghamshire
    GIFT OF Mrs. S. Einarsson Advent ures-of. I 1 heTAerry-Friar-carriefh Robia-acro/VfheWater : %??VV' V THE MERRY ADVENTURES of ROBIN HOOD of Great Renown, in Nottinghamshire . WRITTEN and ILLUSTRATED W\ By HOWARD PYLE. NEW YORK-. Printed by CHARLES SCR IBNER'S SONS A^.743^74 5 Broadway, and sold by same MDCCCLXXXIU. Copyright, 1883, By CHARLES SCKIBNER'S SONS. From the Author to the Reader. U who so plod amid serious things that you feel it shame to give even a short moments to mirth and rOyourself tip for few joyous- in the land think that ness of Fancy ; you who life hath nought to do with innocent laughter that can harm no one ; these pages are not to the leaves and no than this I tell for you. Clap go farther ', for you plainly that if you go farther you will be scandalized by seeing good, sober folks of real history so frisk and caper in gay colors and motley, that you would not know them but for the names tagged to them. Here is a stout, lusty fellow with a quick temper, yet none so ill for all that, who goes by the name of Henry II. Here is a fair, gentle lady before whom all the others bow and call her Queen Eleanor. Here is a fat rogue of a fellow, dressed up in rich robes of a clerical kind, that all the good folk call my Lord Bishop of Hereford. Here is a certain fellow with a sour temper and a grim look the worshipful, the Sheriff of Nottingham.
    [Show full text]
  • Pride Lineup R Ee Qb
    F PRIDE LINEUP R EE QB Nottinghamshire’s Queer Bulletin August/September 2011 Number 61 The Pride stage will undergo meiosis and divide into 4. As well as the Main Stage (hosted by Harry Derbridge - from “The only way is Essex”), Politicians experience often scath- you can enjoy the Acoustic Stage, the Comedy Stage and a family zone - ing criticism on a daily basis in our The Village Green. Some of the performers featured are listed below. newspapers. On radio and televi- sion they are subject to the mock- MAIN STAGE ACOUSTIC STAGE COMEDY STAGE ery which is part of a tradition going Booty Luv Kenelis Julie Jepson back to - at least - the ancient Ruth Lorenzo Maniére des Suzi Ruffle Greeks. Cartoonists have a field day. David Cameron is portrayed Drag with No Name Bohémiens Rosie Wilby by one as a "Little Lord Fauntleroy" Fat Digester Gallery 47 Rachel Stubbins type and by another as a pink hu- Propaganda Betty Munroe & Josephine Ettrick-Hogg man condom with big wobbly Danny Stafford The Blue Majestix Carly Smallman Youth Spot The Idolins breasts. VILLAGE GREEN Jo Francis Emily Franklin Our mockery and fact-based criti- Captain Dangerous Wax Ersatz Asian Dance Group cisms of Kay Cutts pale beside this Vibebar May KB Pirate Show and beside what one reads on the Benjamin Bloom Selma Thurman Carlton Brass Band local Parish of Nottinghamshire Grey Matter Ball Bois display website, to which we referred. Poli- The Cedars Hosts: John Gill & Dog display team ticians need broad shoulders. Bear- NG1/@D2 Princess Babserella Tatterneers Band ing in mind the size of Mrs Cutts' "shoulders", the County Library QB ban is utterly predictable.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lies of the Regicides? Charles I's Judges at the Restoration
    THE LIES OF THE REGICIDES? CHARLES I’S JUDGES AT THE RESTORATION By Dr Jason Peacey Those involved in the trial of Charles I, and who were still living in 1660, found themselves marked men. Vilified in public and in print, they faced choices about how to behave, and how to respond to the probability that they would be punished by the king or parliament. Some fled, and some of these lived out their days in relative safety, although others lived troubled lives, either because of the threat of violence or of capture, and some clearly lived in obscurity and sought to cover their tracks and assume new identities. Some were eventually caught, and three were brought back to England, tried, sentenced and executed. Others surrendered under the terms of a June 1660 proclamation, either in the hope of securing pardon or of mitigating their guilt, although it was always clear that their fate depended upon the attitude of MPs, who were given the power to determine who should be punished and who should be pardoned. As it turned out, MPs proved more vindictive than the king, resulting in the trial of twenty-nine men in October 1660, twenty-seven of whom pleaded guilty. There followed a bloody week of hangings, drawings and quarterings, when ‘the stench of their burnt bowels had so putrefied the air as the inhabitants thereabouts petitioned His Majesty there might be no more executed in that place’.1 My aim here is to explore how some of those associated with the king’s trial responded to the Restoration, not least because the fate of the regicides has received considerably less attention than that of Charles I, and because most attention has been paid to the attitude and grizzly fate of those radical and defiant king-killers who expressed little remorse.2 And my purpose is to suggest that existing treatments of the regicides focus too heavily upon a small group of living and dead men, from Oliver Cromwell to Thomas Harrison.
    [Show full text]
  • The Levellers: Radical Political Thought in the English Revolution
    Published on Reviews in History (https://reviews.history.ac.uk) The Levellers: Radical Political Thought in the English Revolution Review Number: 1519 Publish date: Thursday, 12 December, 2013 Author: Rachel Foxley ISBN: 9780719089367 Date of Publication: 2013 Price: £70.00 Pages: 304pp. Publisher: Manchester University Press Publisher url: http://www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk/cgi-bin/indexer?product=9780719089367 Place of Publication: Manchester Reviewer: John Rees It may be hard to believe but there has been no single-author, book length study of the Levellers since H. N. Brailsford’s The Levellers and the English Revolution was published in 1961. Rachel Foxley has ended this interregnum in fine style, but before looking at her new work it is worth examining why its publication is such a rare occurrence. Firstly, the absence of a monograph about the Levellers is not the same as there being no published work at all. The recent collection of essays on the Agreement of the People edited by Philip Baker and Elliott Vernon was a substantial contribution to the history of the Levellers. Michael Mendel edited a similar collection about the Putney Debates in 2001. And there have been some collections of Leveller writings brought together by Geoffrey Robertson in 2007 and by Andrew Sharp in 1998.(1) Beyond this there has been a mass of essays and articles in academic journals which have debated the role of the Levellers in the revolution. But taken all together this is still a relatively small amount of material compared to the rate at which books came from the presses between, say, the two collections of Leveller tracts published by Wolfe and by Haller and Davies in 1944 and Christopher Hill’s The World Turned Upside Down in 1971.
    [Show full text]
  • For Children 1
    1 500BOOKS FOR CHILDREN 1 NORA E. BEUST Specialist in School Libraries /114.4 14. or, . 11 4 -es . - ,0 I . A PW oh Bulletin 1939, No. 11 It t<1 maim STATICS DEPARTMENT OPTILEINTERIOR,HaroldL. Ickes,Seeman MIMIOFIDUCATION, J. W. Studebaker,Ceuradosiesar ailed States GarmasheetPrintingMks Wesklegtsa 44t re Oa tif fla 011111010111,stOfDmINIIN, WasiOntra,D. A hieslasea* . ,': i ....- ,..- i: : ... 4.1 :. - '' , .t t^ bayV . - - .4,)' 4: I r * $'` :f . o W...1*- 4"4'-' ' .''... r . 4l 4.47. .5 14.11$f 4'.'t :..!`'.: t I ' . r :" ' gi ' ,k, i 4't, 'I: - 4 , ' '... ..!1' 'et i; s :- i . 7.% t . t .. nzs 1 - 7,...., k trd, '; "'" ". , e" e 7 4 , J t, RAY, Ars "274LV,INi .th Wei LW" lb 1 s . CONTENTS Page FOREWORD_ 01, 411. v bi PRIPIACZ _ SECTIONI (Grades 1-3)__ 6 SECTIONII (Grades 4-6) ,. .......... - - - ........___ 20 , SECTIONIII (Grades 7-8) 38 NEWBRRTMEI3AL BOOKS _ 53 CALDICOTI' AWARDS__IMP MO OW as I ND 55 ILLUSTRATORS 59 PuBusaxas. 66 k hoax_ 110 am, airo 69 vt, In I 1 *0' e. 7t. ' A. " -.Or' ' ,s a __,* '--. .4- a .I, ,,,e vala. a,ra ., . * * i f, Or . N, :' * 10 ara.." .1,-*-vot. 1 v.irjrr; ,- ''4" 1,4-*vf.1.4 5 at: IC .._." 1. 1 ''''', , -4` -. % ... t p - _., J:, tit .3,..7" t. '-,,,....,....;lf,- riit, t,..12 ..PFle-... re .0* - .).... 1- . - ' .i. 41; , '9.14 a Onegift thefairiesgave me.(Three Theycommonlybestowedof yore.) Thelove ofbooks,the goldenkey Thatopenstheenchanteddoor. IOW ANDREW LANG. FromBallade oftheBookworm. Iv- - - 4. -'k,' 7 t45.11.. et* 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Speakers of the House of Commons
    Parliamentary Information List BRIEFING PAPER 04637a 21 August 2015 Speakers of the House of Commons Speaker Date Constituency Notes Peter de Montfort 1258 − William Trussell 1327 − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Styled 'Procurator' Henry Beaumont 1332 (Mar) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Sir Geoffrey Le Scrope 1332 (Sep) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Probably Chief Justice. William Trussell 1340 − William Trussell 1343 − Appeared for the Commons alone. William de Thorpe 1347-1348 − Probably Chief Justice. Baron of the Exchequer, 1352. William de Shareshull 1351-1352 − Probably Chief Justice. Sir Henry Green 1361-1363¹ − Doubtful if he acted as Speaker. All of the above were Presiding Officers rather than Speakers Sir Peter de la Mare 1376 − Sir Thomas Hungerford 1377 (Jan-Mar) Wiltshire The first to be designated Speaker. Sir Peter de la Mare 1377 (Oct-Nov) Herefordshire Sir James Pickering 1378 (Oct-Nov) Westmorland Sir John Guildesborough 1380 Essex Sir Richard Waldegrave 1381-1382 Suffolk Sir James Pickering 1383-1390 Yorkshire During these years the records are defective and this Speaker's service might not have been unbroken. Sir John Bussy 1394-1398 Lincolnshire Beheaded 1399 Sir John Cheyne 1399 (Oct) Gloucestershire Resigned after only two days in office. John Dorewood 1399 (Oct-Nov) Essex Possibly the first lawyer to become Speaker. Sir Arnold Savage 1401(Jan-Mar) Kent Sir Henry Redford 1402 (Oct-Nov) Lincolnshire Sir Arnold Savage 1404 (Jan-Apr) Kent Sir William Sturmy 1404 (Oct-Nov) Devonshire Or Esturmy Sir John Tiptoft 1406 Huntingdonshire Created Baron Tiptoft, 1426.
    [Show full text]
  • To Registers of General Admission South Yorkshire Lunatic Asylum (Later Middlewood Hospital), 1872 - 1910 : Surnames L-R
    Index to Registers of General Admission South Yorkshire Lunatic Asylum (Later Middlewood Hospital), 1872 - 1910 : Surnames L-R To order a copy of an entry (which will include more information than is in this index) please complete an order form (www.sheffield.gov.uk/libraries/archives‐and‐local‐studies/copying‐ services) and send with a sterling cheque for £8.00. Please quote the name of the patient, their number and the reference number. Surname First names Date of admission Age Occupation Abode Cause of insanity Date of discharge, death, etc No. Ref No. Laceby John 01 July 1879 39 None Killingholme Weak intellect 08 February 1882 1257 NHS3/5/1/3 Lacey James 23 July 1901 26 Labourer Handsworth Epilepsy 07 November 1918 5840 NHS3/5/1/14 Lack Frances Emily 06 May 1910 24 Sheffield 30 September 1910 8714 NHS3/5/1/21 Ladlow James 14 February 1894 25 Pit Laborer Barnsley Not known 10 December 1913 4203 NHS3/5/1/10 Laidler Emily 31 December 1879 36 Housewife Sheffield Religion 30 June 1887 1489 NHS3/5/1/3 Laines Sarah 01 July 1879 42 Servant Willingham Not known 07 February 1880 1375 NHS3/5/1/3 Laister Ethel Beatrice 30 September 1910 21 Sheffield 05 July 1911 8827 NHS3/5/1/21 Laister William 18 September 1899 40 Horsekeeper Sheffield Influenza 21 December 1899 5375 NHS3/5/1/13 Laister William 28 March 1905 43 Horse keeper Sheffield Not known 14 June 1905 6732 NHS3/5/1/17 Laister William 28 April 1906 44 Carter Sheffield Not known 03 November 1906 6968 NHS3/5/1/18 Laitner Sarah 04 April 1898 29 Furniture travellers wife Worksop Death of two
    [Show full text]
  • Stapylton Final Version
    1 THE PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE OF FREEDOM FROM ARREST, 1603–1629 Keith A. T. Stapylton UCL Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2016 Page 2 DECLARATION I, Keith Anthony Thomas Stapylton, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed Page 3 ABSTRACT This thesis considers the English parliamentary privilege of freedom from arrest (and other legal processes), 1603-1629. Although it is under-represented in the historiography, the early Stuart Commons cherished this particular privilege as much as they valued freedom of speech. Previously one of the privileges requested from the monarch at the start of a parliament, by the seventeenth century freedom from arrest was increasingly claimed as an ‘ancient’, ‘undoubted’ right that secured the attendance of members, and safeguarded their honour, dignity, property, and ‘necessary’ servants. Uncertainty over the status and operation of the privilege was a major contemporary issue, and this prompted key questions for research. First, did ill definition of the constitutional relationship between the crown and its prerogatives, and parliament and its privileges, lead to tensions, increasingly polemical attitudes, and a questioning of the royal prerogative? Where did sovereignty now lie? Second, was it important to maximise the scope of the privilege, if parliament was to carry out its business properly? Did ad hoc management of individual privilege cases nevertheless have the cumulative effect of enhancing the authority and confidence of the Commons? Third, to what extent was the exploitation or abuse of privilege an unintended consequence of the strengthening of the Commons’ authority in matters of privilege? Such matters are not treated discretely, but are embedded within chapters that follow a thematic, broadly chronological approach.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the NAVY in the ENGLISH CIVIL WAR Submitted by Michael James
    1 THE NAVY IN THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR Submitted by Michael James Lea-O’Mahoney, to the University of Exeter, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in September 2011. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. 2 ABSTRACT This thesis is concerned chiefly with the military role of sea power during the English Civil War. Parliament’s seizure of the Royal Navy in 1642 is examined in detail, with a discussion of the factors which led to the King’s loss of the fleet and the consequences thereafter. It is concluded that Charles I was outmanoeuvred politically, whilst Parliament’s choice to command the fleet, the Earl of Warwick, far surpassed him in popularity with the common seamen. The thesis then considers the advantages which control of the Navy provided for Parliament throughout the war, determining that the fleet’s protection of London, its ability to supply besieged outposts and its logistical support to Parliamentarian land forces was instrumental in preventing a Royalist victory. Furthermore, it is concluded that Warwick’s astute leadership went some way towards offsetting Parliament’s sporadic neglect of the Navy. The thesis demonstrates, however, that Parliament failed to establish the unchallenged command of the seas around the British Isles.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhoda (Axtell) Cory
    LINEAL ANCESTORS of RHODA (AXTELL) CORY, mother of Captain James Cory GENEALOGICAL HISTORICAL and BIOGRAPHICAL Volume II Part I Compiled from various xenealo.~ies and histories for private distribution among interested partics and libraries with no pecuniary solicitions whatever. 1937 DEDICATED TO OUR IMMIGRANT MOTHERS WHO BRAVED HARDSHIPS AND TRIALS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THEIR PIONEER HUSBANDS, SO THEIR POSTERITY MIGHT HAVE FULL FREEDOM IN THE NEW COUNTRY OF AMERICA, OF WHICH THEY COULD BUT LITTLE DREAM. RHODA(AXTELL) CORY (177 5-1865) ERRATA, Cory Geneal. (E7.C82) r. !I, 75. Maryl. Withington m. 'Ihomas~ Danforth .in New Eng. having emigrated in 1654. (See Danforth GeneLl.,-p.18) m.w.f. 1939 THE AXTELL LINEAGE THO MAS1 AXTELL was the third son in the family of William Axtell, born in Berkhamstead, Hertfordshire, England. When a few months old he was baptized at St. Peter's Church there on January 26, 1619. As his father had died and was buried on May 23, 1638, he had not reached his majority. By his father's will he was remem­ bered by a bequest of ten shillings. While yet under age he mar­ ried his wife there, as indicated by the birth of his first child, the year being 1639. Their marriage is not recorded in the Hertfordshire parish register, which obliterates any attempt to discover the identity of his wife. His mother's Christain name was Thomasin, but unfortunately there is no record to tell whose daughter she was. He had brothers, John, baptized August 11, 1614; William, December 1, 1616; Dan­ iel, May 26, 1622; Samuel, December 15, 1624 and a sister Sarah, June 20, 1628.
    [Show full text]
  • J\S-Aacj\ Cwton "Wallop., $ Bl Sari Of1{Ports Matd/I
    :>- S' Ui-cfAarria, .tffzatirU&r- J\s-aacj\ cwton "Wallop., $ bL Sari of1 {Ports matd/i y^CiJixtkcr- ph JC. THE WALLOP FAMILY y4nd Their Ancestry By VERNON JAMES WATNEY nATF MICROFILMED iTEld #_fe - PROJECT and G. S ROLL * CALL # Kjyb&iDey- , ' VOL. 1 WALLOP — COLE 1/7 OXFORD PRINTED BY JOHN JOHNSON Printer to the University 1928 GENEALOGirA! DEPARTMENT CHURCH ••.;••• P-. .go CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS Omnes, si ad originem primam revocantur, a dis sunt. SENECA, Epist. xliv. One hundred copies of this work have been printed. PREFACE '•"^AN these bones live ? . and the breath came into them, and they ^-^ lived, and stood up upon their feet, an exceeding great army.' The question, that was asked in Ezekiel's vision, seems to have been answered satisfactorily ; but it is no easy matter to breathe life into the dry bones of more than a thousand pedigrees : for not many of us are interested in the genealogies of others ; though indeed to those few such an interest is a living thing. Several of the following pedigrees are to be found among the most ancient of authenticated genealogical records : almost all of them have been derived from accepted and standard works ; and the most modern authorities have been consulted ; while many pedigrees, that seemed to be doubtful, have been omitted. Their special interest is to be found in the fact that (with the exception of some of those whose names are recorded in the Wallop pedigree, including Sir John Wallop, K.G., who ' walloped' the French in 1515) every person, whose lineage is shown, is a direct (not a collateral) ancestor of a family, whose continuous descent can be traced since the thirteenth century, and whose name is identical with that part of England in which its members have held land for more than seven hundred and fifty years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Extraordinary Case of the Blood-Drinking and Flesh-Eating Cavaliers1 Angela Mcshane
    13TEME_cha11(192-210) 4/24/10 12:11 PM Page 192 This file is to be used only for a purpose specified by Palgrave Macmillan, such as checking proofs, preparing an index, reviewing, endorsing or planning coursework/other institutional needs. You may store and print the file and share it with others helping you with the specified purpose, but under no circumstances may the file be distributed or otherwise made accessible to any other third parties without the express prior permission of Palgrave Macmillan. Please contact [email protected] if you have any queries regarding use of the file. Proof 11 The Extraordinary Case of the Blood-Drinking and Flesh-Eating Cavaliers1 Angela McShane In May 1650, A Perfect Diurnall of Some Passages and Proceedings of Parliament and in Relation to the Armies in England and Ireland reported that ‘very lately […] at Milton in Barkeshire’ a ‘company of [5] Royalists at an alehouse, being drunke, they out of zeale of affection to their King at Bredagh, would drink his health in blood, and to effect this, unanimously agreed to cut a peece of their Buttocks, and fry their flesh that was cut off on a grid-iron’. The group were discovered when one man’s ‘excessive bleeding’ forced his companions to call a surgeon. In turn, this alerted another man’s wife who lived nearby. She burst into the room and ‘laid about her’ with a pair of tongs ‘so sav[ing] her husband cutting of his flesh’. The ensuing commotion drew the attention of the authorities. The men were questioned by the Governor of Wallingford, Major Arthur Evelyn, and were bound over to appear before the next Quarter Sessions.2 Little further information about the case remains.
    [Show full text]