DOCSLIB.ORG

Air Monitoring Network

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Air Monitoring Network 2016-2017 Ohio Air Monitoring222 Network Plan Division of Air Pollution Control May 2016 Revised December 2016 Table of Contents Introduction and Requirements _______________________________________________ 1 Guidance and Priorities _____________________________________________________ 1 Network Changes __________________________________________________________ 1 PM2.5 FRM Filter Based and PM2.5 Continuous Network ________________________________ 2 Ozone Network ________________________________________________________________ 4 PM10 Network _________________________________________________________________ 4 SO2 Network __________________________________________________________________ 5 PWEI ________________________________________________________________________________ 5 SO2 Data Requirement Rule ______________________________________________________________ 6 AEP Cardinal Power Plant SO2 Network_____________________________________________________ 6 Nitrogen Dioxide Network _______________________________________________________ 6 Carbon Monoxide Network_______________________________________________________ 7 Lead (Pb) Network ______________________________________________________________ 7 Annual Pb Emissions Review ____________________________________________________________ 10 Pb Monitoring Waiver Review ___________________________________________________________ 10 SEDO Community Scale Grant Project _____________________________________________ 11 NCore Monitoring Network ______________________________________________________ 12 Summary of Network Changes by MSA ____________________________________________ 12 Tabular Summary of Proposed Monitoring Changes by Reporting Organization ____________ 16 Tabular Summary of Proposed Changes by Pollutant _________________________________ 17 Ohio’s Primary Quality Assurance Organization Changes (PQAO) _______________________ 19 Complete Network Plan Description __________________________________________ 20 Public Review and Comment ________________________________________________ 38 Table of Tables Table 1: Minimum PM2.5 Monitoring Requirements ................................................................ 2 Table 2: Minimum Ozone Monitoring Requirements .............................................................. 4 Table 3: Minimum PM10 Monitoring Requirements ................................................................ 5 Table 4: 2016-2017 Lead/Metals Monitoring Network Plan .................................................... 9 Table 5:Tabular Summary of Proposed Monitoring Changes by Reporting Organization .... 16 Table 6: Tabular Summary of Proposed Changes by Pollutant .............................................. 17 Table 7: 2016-2017 Ohio Air Monitoring Network ............................................................... 22 Table of Appendices Appendix A- Ohio Active Monitoring Sites Quick View Tabulation Table Appendix B- RAPCA 2016-2017 Air Monitoring Network Plan Appendix C- SWOAQA 2016-2017 Air Monitoring Network Plan Appendix D- 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D Site Requirements Analysis Appendix E- Ohio EPA Pollutant Network Maps Appendix F- Monitoring Site Description Templates Appendix G – USEPA Data Assessment Tool Results Appendix H- Public Comments Attachment: Comments from May 2016 Draft Ohio 2016-2017 Air Monitoring Network Introduction and Requirements As required by 40 CFR 58.10, Ohio EPA provided the annual 2016-2017 Air Monitoring Network Plan to US EPA Region V by July 1, 2016. Ohio EPA is now providing a revision to this plan for a 30-day public review and comment period. No revisions are being incorporated into Appendices B, C, E or F of this document at this time. These appendices remain as they were submitted by the July 1, 2016 deadline although they are being provided during the review period for clarity. This document, along with Appendices A, D and G are being updated to provide additional details regarding Ohio’s plan for fulfilling the requirements of Appendices A, C, D, and E of 40 CFR Part 58. This document addresses the Ohio air monitoring network, as it existed as of July 1, 2016, and as it is expected to be updated through June 30, 2017. Further, Ohio’s air monitoring network plan contained within meets all the requirements of Appendices A, C, D, and E of 40 CFR Part 58. Ohio EPA will submit the revised plan, and all appendices, with any comments received, to the US EPA Region V Regional Administrator. All comments received in the original and revised monitoring network plan can be found in Appendix H. Guidance and Priorities Ohio EPA follows the federal general guidance and requirements for air monitoring according to 40 CFR 58, Appendix D, including monitoring 1) areas of expected high concentrations, 2) areas of high population density, 3) areas with significant sources, 4) general background concentration sites and 5) areas of regional transport of a pollutant. Not all air pollutants need to have sites for all of these categories. In addition to the above, the Air Directors in the Region 5 states of Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin and Minnesota have adopted the following air monitoring objectives: 1) Areas of high concentration and high population, provide timely air quality data to the public, support compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and control strategy development and support air pollution research studies 2) Multi-pollutant monitoring such as the NCore sites 3) Source-oriented monitoring such as required monitoring for lead, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide 4) Rural monitoring and medium size city monitoring 5) Environmental justice monitoring 6) School air toxics monitoring A fundamental consideration for all air monitoring projects and sites is that the monitoring locations meet US EPA requirements and that the state and local air agencies are available to operate and maintain the sites and equipment, to provide sample analyses, and are available for data collection and reporting. Network Changes The plan for Ohio’s Air Monitoring Network for 2016-2017 is to make changes as required, or necessary, for the air monitoring network. A quick-view of Ohio’s current monitoring network for each of the criteria pollutants can be found in Appendix A. Network maps for Page | 1 each of the US EPA criteria pollutants, critical summary statistics from 2015 monitoring data, and three-year averages of the 2013-2015 monitoring data are presented in Appendix E. All planned, proposed and potential network changes for each local and district office monitoring network are tabulated in Tables 5 and 6 below. A larger detailed table provided at the end of this document contains a listing of Ohio’s complete air monitoring network with proposed changes noted. Unplanned site changes occur to the network each year. Changes or temporary interruptions of sampling may occur because of events such as building or roof maintenance, construction, change of ownership of the site, or other changes at the site that require moving the instruments. Some changes that may not be planned could include adding sites for complaint areas or for a new or proposed facility. Other changes that are planned may not be implemented due to unforeseen circumstances, such as the inability to secure a new site or because of other constraints. All site and parameter changes are made in consultation with, and approval of, the US EPA Region V air monitoring staff. Ohio EPA retains the right to install and operate ambient air quality monitors that go beyond federal minimum requirements without federal approval. PM2.5 FRM Filter Based and PM2.5 Continuous Network For sites that monitor very fine particulate matter (PM2.5), Ohio EPA expects to continue with monitoring or sampling using the PM2.5 Federal Reference Method (FRM) at the majority of the sites as they existed at the beginning of 2016. Ohio’s 2016-2017 PM2.5 monitoring network can be seen in Appendix A. Maps depicting locations of each site are presented in Appendix E. Table 1 below identifies the minimum FRM monitoring sites required under 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, Table D-5. 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, Section 4.7.2 requires continuous PM2.5 analyzers in the same MSAs be equal to at least one-half (round up) of the minimum required FRM monitoring sites listed in the 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, Table D-5. Appendix D of this document includes an analysis showing Ohio’s existing network meets the minimum siting requirements in 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D for both PM2.5 FRM monitoring and PM2.5 continuous monitoring in Ohio’s Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA), taking into account known network changes as outlined in this document. Design values to compare to the NAAQS can be found in Appendix E of this document. Table 1: Minimum PM2.5 Monitoring Requirements Table D-5 Appendix D to Part 58 SLAMS Minimum PM2.5 Monitoring Requirements MSA population1,2 Most recent 3-yr design Most recent 3-yr design Value >=of any PM2.5 Value >=of any PM2.5 3 3,4 NAAQS NAAQS >1,000,0000…… 3 2 500,000-1,000,000 2 1 50,000<500,000 1 0 1 Minimum monitoring requirements apply to the Metropolitan statistical area (MSA). 2 Population based on latest available census figures. 3 The PM2.5 NAAQS levels and form are defined in 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D 4 These minimum monitoring requirements apply in the absence of a design value 5 MSA must contain an urbanized area of 50,000 or more population Page | 2 In Ohio, there are a number of continuous monitors that are designated as a Federal Equivalent
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States
    +44 20 8123 2220 [email protected] Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States https://marketpublishers.com/r/AC4983D1366EN.html Date: June 2012 Pages: 700 Price: US$ 450.00 (Single User License) ID: AC4983D1366EN Abstracts The global energy industry has explored many options to meet the growing energy needs of industrialized economies wherein production demands are to be met with supply of power from varied energy resources worldwide. There has been a clearer realization of the finite nature of oil resources and the ever higher pushing demand for energy. The world has yet to stabilize on the complex geopolitical undercurrents which influence the oil and gas production as well as supply strategies globally. Aruvian's R'search’s report – Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States - analyzes the scope of American energy production from varied traditional sources as well as the developing renewable energy sources. In view of understanding energy transactions, the report also studies the revenue returns for investors in various energy channels which manifest themselves in American energy demand and supply dynamics. In depth view has been provided in this report of US oil, electricity, natural gas, nuclear power, coal, wind, and hydroelectric sectors. The various geopolitical interests and intentions governing the exploitation, production, trade and supply of these resources for energy production has also been analyzed by this report in a non-partisan manner. The report starts with a descriptive base analysis of the characteristics of the global energy industry in terms of economic quantity of demand. The drivers of demand and the traditional resources which are used to fulfill this demand are explained along with the emerging mandate of nuclear energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Tcu Winter 2020
    THE A Publication of The Association of CONSTRUCTIONWINTER 2020 USERUnion Constructors www.tauc.org ADVANCING UNION CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE A Celebration of Safety at the National Cathedral SEE PAGE 18 664527_Winter2020Magazine.indd4527_Winter2020Magazine.indd 1 11/25/20/25/20 99:04:04 AAMM The Boilermakers advantage FORGED FROM INTEGRITY. WE ARE MULTI-SKILLED RIGGERS, FITTERS, WELDERS AND MORE. WE ARE COMMITTED TO WORKING SAFELY. WE ARE 100% SUBSTANCE ABUSE TESTED. WE ARE COMMITTED TO YOUR SUCCESS. WE LIVE THE BOILERMAKER CODE. WE ARE BOILERMAKERS. Let’s get to work together. Visit us online at BestInTrade.org 664527_Winter2020Magazine.indd4527_Winter2020Magazine.indd 2 11/25/20/25/20 110:250:25 AAMM THE A Publication of The Association of CONSTRUCTIONWINTER 2020 USERUnion Constructors www.tauc.org ADVANCING UNION CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE The Construction User is published quarterly by: IN EVERY ISSUE IN EVERY CORNER THE ASSOCIATION OF UNION 4 FROM THE DESK OF THE PRESIDENT 8 THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS CORNER CONSTRUCTORS The Safety Seven: Perspectives 1501 Lee Highway, Suite 202 Breaking Unsafe Routines Arlington, Va 22209 From the C-Suite Jim Daley 703.524.3336 Steve Johnson 703.524.3364 (Fax) 10 THE BRESLIN CORNER www.tauc.org Safety: A Leadership Belief EXECUTIVE EDITOR FEATURED ARTICLE at Every Level David Acord Mark Breslin 703.628.5545 6 The First Pillar [email protected] Steve Lindauer 11 THE TECH CORNER ADVERTISING REPRESENTATIVE A Seat at the Table: TAUC, (Contact for rates and details) Technology & the Future of ZISA® COVERAGE Bill Spilman Our Industry Innovative Media Solutions Todd Mustard 320 W. Chestnut St. 18 A Night to Remember P.o.
    [Show full text]
  • January 6, 2017 Administrator Gina Mccarthy U.S
    January 6, 2017 Administrator Gina McCarthy U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Room 3000 William Jefferson Clinton Building – Mail Code 1101A 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20460 Via e-mail: [email protected] and Federal Express Re: Petition for Reconsideration of Air Quality Designation for Gallia County, Ohio for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard – Round 2; Final Rule, EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0464, FRL-9948-87-OAR Dear Administrator McCarthy: Pursuant to Section 307(d)(7)(B) of the Clean Air Act (“CAA” or “Act”), Sierra Club hereby petitions the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA” or “Agency”) to reconsider her decision to designate the Gallia County, Ohio area surrounding the Gavin and Kyger coal-burning plants as unclassifiable for the 2010 sulfur dioxide (“SO2”) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (“NAAQS”) in the final rule, Air Quality Designations for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard – Round 2, 81 Fed. Reg. 45,039, 45,053 (July 12, 2016) (“SO2 Designation Rule”). In the Ohio Technical Support Document for the SO2 Designation Rule, EPA determined that it could not designate Gallia County as nonattainment based on Sierra Club’s air dispersion modeling showing SO2 NAAQS exceedances.1 After the close of the comment period for the proposed SO2 designations, however, EPA issued designations for the SO2 NAAQS for four areas in Texas, along with accompanying technical support and response to comment documents, that are inconsistent with EPA’s rejection of Sierra Club’s modeling for Gallia County. See 81 Fed.
    [Show full text]
  • Affidavit of CW Billups in Support of NRC Motion for Summary
    , . .: . UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY AND ) Docket Nos. 50-400-0L NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN MUNICIPAL ) 50-401-0L POWER AGENCY ) ) (Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, ) Units 1 and 2) ) AFFIDAVIT OF CHARLES W. BILLUPS IN SUPPORT OF NRC STAFF M0TinN FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION OF EDDLEMAN CONTENTION 8F(1) I, Charles W. Billups, being first duly sworn do depose and state: 1. I, Charles W. Billups, am an employee of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. My present position is as an Aquatic Scientist in the Environmental and Hydrologic Engineering Branch, within the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. A copy of my professional qualifications is attached. 2. I give this affidavit in support of Summary Disposition of Eddleman Contention 8F(1) in this proceeding, and I certify that I have | personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein and that the state- ments are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. 3. Eddleman Contention 8F(1) in this proceeding states: < " Health effects of the coal particulates 1,154 MT per year, are not analyzed nor given sufficient | | weight." I 8312300270 831202 PDR ADOCK 05000400 0 PDR i , . .- -- W . - . - , . ~ . - . - . -. ,. - . _ . , ,. -2- 4. The purpose of this affidavit is to demonstrate (1) that the Table S-3 level of coal particulates released in the uranium fuel cycle is negligible with regard to the operation of the Harris Nuclear Plant, (2) that f.ie impacts including health effects of emitted particulates from coal combustion at the electrical generating stations or grids involved in the uranium fuel cycle have been thoroughly considered in the NEPA reviews for-the individual gaseous diffusion plants, the major source (96%) of emitted coal particulates in the uranium fuel cycle, and (3) that there is reasonable assurance that the 10 C.F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear and Coal in the Postwar US Dissertation Presented in Partial
    Power From the Valley: Nuclear and Coal in the Postwar U.S. Dissertation Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Megan Lenore Chew, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Steven Conn, Advisor Randolph Roth David Steigerwald Copyright by Megan Lenore Chew 2014 Abstract In the years after World War II, small towns, villages, and cities in the Ohio River Valley region of Ohio and Indiana experienced a high level of industrialization not seen since the region’s commercial peak in the mid-19th century. The development of industries related to nuclear and coal technologies—including nuclear energy, uranium enrichment, and coal-fired energy—changed the social and physical environments of the Ohio Valley at the time. This industrial growth was part of a movement to decentralize industry from major cities after World War II, involved the efforts of private corporations to sell “free enterprise” in the 1950s, was in some cases related to U.S. national defense in the Cold War, and brought some of the largest industrial complexes in the U.S. to sparsely populated places in the Ohio Valley. In these small cities and villages— including Madison, Indiana, Cheshire, Ohio, Piketon, Ohio, and Waverly, Ohio—the changes brought by nuclear and coal meant modern, enormous industry was taking the place of farms and cornfields. These places had been left behind by the growth seen in major metropolitan areas, and they saw the potential for economic growth in these power plants and related industries.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Kyger Creek Emergency Action Plan
    Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 11687 Lebanon Road, Cincinnati, OH 45241-2012 April 17, 2017 File: 175534017 Revision 0 Ohio Valley Electric Corporation 3932 U.S. Route 23 P.O. Box 468 Piketon, Ohio 45661 RE: Emergency Action Plan South Fly Ash Pond and Boiler Slag Pond EPA Final Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) Rule Kyger Creek Station Cheshire, Gallia County, Ohio 1.0 PURPOSE This letter documents Stantec’s certification of the emergency action plan (EAP) for the Ohio Valley Electric Corporation (OVEC) Kyger Creek Station’s South Fly Ash Pond (SFAP) and Boiler Slag Pond (BSP). The EPA Final CCR Rule requires owners or operators of CCR surface impoundments classified as high or significant hazard potential (per 40 CFR 257.73(a)(2)) to prepare and maintain a written EAP. Stantec has reviewed the existing EAP for the Kyger Creek Station’s SFAP and BSP. Based on this assessment, the EAP for the SFAP and BSP is in compliance with requirements listed in 40 CFR 257.73(a)(3). 2.0 EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN - REQUIREMENTS As described in 40 CFR 257.73(a)(3), for a high hazard or significant hazard potential CCR surface impoundment, a documented EAP is required to: A) Define the events or circumstances involving the CCR unit that represent a safety emergency, along with a description of the procedures that will be followed to detect a safety emergency in a timely manner; B) Define responsible persons, their respective responsibilities, and notification procedures in the event of a safety emergency involving the CCR unit; C) Provide contact information of emergency responders; D) Include a map which delineates the downstream area which would be affected in the event of a CCR unit failure and a physical description of the CCR unit; and E) Include provisions for an annual face-to-face meeting or exercise between representatives of the owner or operator of the CCR unit and the local emergency responders.
    [Show full text]
  • April 27, 2020 Mr. Kurt A. Thiede Regional
    Mike DeWine, Governor Jon Husted, Lt. Governor Laurie A. Stevenson, Director April 27, 2020 Mr. Kurt A. Thiede Regional Administrator U.S. EPA, Region 5 77 West Jackson Blvd. Chicago, Illinois 60604 Re: Ohio EPA’s Request for Designation of Gallia County, OH and Partial Meigs County, OH to Attainment/Unclassifiable as Part of U.S. EPA’s Round 4 Designation Process Associated with the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) Dear Administrator Thiede: I am writing to submit Ohio’s request for the area of Gallia County, OH and partial Meigs County, OH to be designated attainment/unclassifiable as a part of U.S. EPA’s round 4 designation process associated with the 2010 SO2 NAAQS. U.S. EPA promulgated the revised SO2 NAAQS on June 2, 2010. U.S. EPA replaced the 24-hour and annual standards with a new short-term one-hour standard of 75 parts per billion (ppb). The new one-hour SO2 standard was published on June 22, 2010 (75 FR 35520) and became effective on August 23, 2010. The standard is based on the three-year average of the annual 99th percentile of one-hour daily maximum concentrations. On July 12, 2016, U.S. EPA published (81 FR 45039) final second round designations for these source areas included in a U.S. EPA consent decree. In this action, U.S. EPA designated the area around Gavin and Kyger Creek Power Plants (specifically, all of Gallia County and the western half of Meigs County, which includes Bedford, Columbia, Rutland, Salem, Salisbury, and Scipio Townships) as unclassifiable.
    [Show full text]
  • Tcu Winter 2019
    A D V A N C I N G U N I O N C O N S T R U C T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E A Publication of The Association of Union Constructors | www.tauc.org | Winter 2019 0>1 THE VALUE OF ZERO CELEBRATING THE 18TH ANNUAL ZISA® WINNERS PAGE 9 LINDAUER: IT'S ALL ABOUT THE DATA PAGE 6 BRESLIN: A DIFFERENT KIND OF SAFETY PAGE 8 SNYDER: THE SECRET TO BETTER CREATIVITY PAGE 24 55277_Magazine_X2.indd 1 1/25/19 4:354:44 PM A D V A N C I N G U N I O N C O N S T R U C T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E A Publication of The Association of Union Constructors | www.tauc.org | Winter 2019 0>1 INDUSTRIAL GENERAL THE CONTRACTING, ENGINEERING VALUE & MAINTENANCE OF ZERO That’s a fancier way of saying that we’re a group of highly-skilled and experienced union contractors that help organizations plan, build, and maintain some of the most CELEBRATING THIS YEAR’S complex infrastructures around the globe. ZISA® WINNERS PAGE 9 Need something? Give us a call. LINDAUER: IT'S ALL ABOUT THE DATA PAGE 6 BRESLIN: A DIFFERENT KIND OF SAFETY PAGE 8 SNYDER: THE SECRET TO BETTER CREATIVITY PAGE 24 2755A PARK AVE, WASHINGTON, PA 15301 - PHONE: 724-884-0184 - FAX: 724-884-0185 55277_Magazine.indd55277_Magazine_X2.indd 2 2 1/23/191/25/19 12:14 4:44 PM A D V A N C I N G U N I O N C O N S T R U C T I O N A N D M A I N T E N A N C E A Publication of The Association of Union Constructors | www.tauc.org | Winter 2019 The Construction User is published quarterly by: The Association of Union Constructors 1501 Lee Highway, Suite 202 From the Desk of the President Arlington, VA 22209 703.524.3336 4 The Pledge 703.524.3364 - fax By Jake Locklear www.tauc.org EXECUTIVE EDITOR 0>1 David Acord Features 703.628.5545 [email protected] 6 It’s All About the Data ADVERTISING REPRESENTATIVE By Steve Lindauer (Contact for rates and details) Bill Spilman 8 A Different Kind of Safety Innovative Media Solutions INDUSTRIAL GENERAL By Mark Breslin 320 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Tcu Winter 2017
    AA DD VV AA NN CC II NN GG UU NNIIOONN CC OONNSS TT RR UU CC TT II OONN AA NN DD MM AA II NN TT EE NN AA NN CC EE A Publication of The Association of Union Constructors | www.tauc.org | Winter 2017-18 2018 FIELD GUIDE Winter 17-18 32 Pages PAGE 6 – TAUC’s 2018 Priorities PAGE 8 – What’s Your Story for 2018? PAGE 10 – When Labor & Antitrust Laws Clash PAGE 11 – Worker Shortages & Safety: The Hidden Link 8.375” x 10.875” The Association of Union Constructors Made in Saddle Stitched America The Construction User Magazine is published quarterly 45617_MAGWinter.indd 1 12/1/17 7:38 AM ADVANCING UNION CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE THECONSTRUCTIONUSER aa veryvery A Publication of The Association of Union Constructors | www.tauc.org | Winter 2017-18 OdeOde ChristmasChristmas BRIAN CHAD FRED ODE MIKE ODE FOUNDER / CEO PRESIDENT KEVIN MELORA MATT TuneTune inin forfor aa freefree demo!demo! VISIT WWW.FOUNDATIONSOFT.COM/ODEBUNCH AMERICA'S #1 CONSTRUCTION ACCOUNTING SOFTWARE® 45617_MAGWinter.indd 2 12/1/17 7:34 AM ADVANCING UNION CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE THECONSTRUCTIONAA DD VV AA NN CC II NN GG UU NNIIOONN CC OONNSS TT RR UU CC TT II OONN AA NN DD MM AA II NN TT EE NN AA NN CC EE USER A Publication of The Association of Union Constructors | www.tauc.org | Winter 2017-18 a veryvery A Publication of The Association of Union Constructors | www.tauc.org | Winter 2017-18 a The Construction User 2018 is published quarterly by: FIELD GUIDE Winter 17-18 32 Pages PAGE 6 – TAUC’s 2018 Priorities PAGE 8 – What’s Your Story for 2018? PAGE 10 – When Labor &
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Valley Electric Corporation
    OHIO VALLEY ELECTRIC CORPORATION P. 0. BOX 16631 COLUMBUS, OH 43216 MEDIA CONTACT: G. Annette Hope Plant Manager Ohio Valley Electric Corporation (7 40) 367-5050 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE KYGER CREEK PLANT TO REDUCE EMISSIONS THROUGH NEW SCRUBBER SYSTEM GALLIPOLIS, Ohio, Oct. 28, 2011 -The Ohio Valley Electric Corp. (OVEC) announced that its Kyger Creek power plant in Cheshire, Ohio, will begin operating the first of two new flue gas desulfurization (FGD) scrubbers in early November, start- up is 1 anticipated the weekend of November 5 h. These state-of-the-art environmental control systems will reduce sulfur dioxide (S02) emissions by up to 98 percent- providing cleaner air for all of us. This $660 million investment is in addition to other investments in environmental control technologies in recent years that reduced our emissions of nitrogen oxides by some 95 percent and our particulate (fly ash) emissions by more than 99 percent. "The scrubber system is an investment in cleaner air for southeastern Ohio," said Annette Hope, Kyger Creek plant manager. "This technology will allow us to continue producing safe and reliable power while meeting environmental regulations and providing critical employment for the surrounding communities." The Kyger Creek plant has five separate 217-MW generating units. The first scrubber will be connected to three of the units at the plant. A second scrubber, connected to the other two units, will begin operation in early 2012. A new stack- 838 feet high and 75 feet in diameter at the base- was built for the FGD system. Hope noted that the scrubber technology increases the amount of water vapor emitted through the stack, causing the plume to be more visible.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Organizations Comments on Ohio’S Proposed Regional Haze State Implementation Plan for the Second Implementation Period
    June 28, 2021 Holly Kaloz Ohio Environmental Protection Agency DAPC Lazarus Government Center P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 Submitted via email to: [email protected] Re: Conservation Organizations Comments on Ohio’s Proposed Regional Haze State Implementation Plan for the Second Implementation Period Dear Ms. Kaloz: The National Parks Conservation Association, Sierra Club, Coalition to Protect America’s National Parks, and Ohio Environmental Council (“Conservation Organizations”) submit the following and attached comments regarding the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency’s (“OEPA”) Regional Haze State Implementation Plan for the Second Implementation Period.1 The Conservation Organizations appreciate the short extension granted to the public comment period. National Parks Conservation Association (“NPCA”) is a national organization whose mission is to protect and enhance America's National Parks for present and future generations. NPCA performs its work through advocacy and education. NPCA has over 1.4 million members and supporters nationwide with its main office in Washington, D.C. and 24 regional and field 1 The attachment comments include, “A Review of the Ohio Regional Haze State Implementation Plan,” which was prepared for NPCA and Sierra Club by Joe Kordzi (June 2021) (Enclosure 1, “Kordzi Report”). Mr. Kordzi is an independent air quality consultant and engineer with extensive experience in the regional haze program. 1 offices. NPCA is active nation-wide in advocating for strong air quality requirements to protect our parks, including submission of petitions and comments relating to visibility issues, regional haze State Implementation Plans, global warming and mercury impacts on parks, and emissions from individual power plants and other sources of pollution affecting National Parks and communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Combustion Waste Damage Case Assessments
    Coal Combustion Waste Damage Case Assessments U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste July 9, 2007 Coal Combustion Waste Damage Case Assessments July 9, 2007 With the exception of the documents listed below, the documents referenced throughout this assessment are available from the docket to the Notice of Data Availability on the Disposal of Coal Combustion Wastes in Landfills and Surface Impoundments at www.regulations.gov, docket ID EPA-HQ-RCRA-2006-0796, through internet links provided, or from other identified sources. 1. Application of Don Frame Trucking, Inc. Petitioner for a Judgment Pursuant to Article 78 of the CPLR against the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Respondent; Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Chautauqua (July 22, 1988). Order G11278. 2. Selenium Posting on Hyco Lake Rescinded, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (NCDHHS), August 2001. 3. Feasibility Study for the Y-12 Chestnut Ridge Operable Unit 2 Filled Coal Ash Pond, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. DOE/OR/02-1259&D1. August 1994. 4. Final Site Investigation Report on Groundwater Contamination, Township of Pines, Porter County, Indiana. December 2002. 5. Texas Bureau of Health (TBH). 1992. Fish Advisory: Brandy Branch Reservoir. May 1992. 6. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). 2003. Improving Water Quality in Brandy Branch Reservoir; One TMDL for Selenium. February 2003. 7. Report: Sulfate Investigation, Miamiview Landfill, Hamilton County, Ohio. Prepared for the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company by Dames & Moore. December 13, 1994. Available in the docket titled Availability of Report to Congress on Fossil Fuel Combustion; Request for Comments and Announcement of Public Hearing, EPA-HQ-RCRA-1999-0022-0632.
    [Show full text]