Arxiv:1812.03136V2 [Gr-Qc] 22 Jun 2019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A Complementary Third Law for Black Hole Thermodynamics Yuan Yao,1 Meng-Shi Hou,1 and Yen Chin Ong1, 2, 3, l 1Center for Gravitation and Cosmology, College of Physical Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, 180 Siwangting Road, Yangzhou City, Jiangsu Province 225002, China 2School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China 3Nordita, KTH Royal Institute of Technology & Stockholm University, Roslagstullsbacken 23, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden There are some examples in the literature, in which despite the fact that the underlying theory or model does not impose a lower bound on the size of black holes, the final temperature under Hawking evaporation is nevertheless finite and nonzero. We show that under some loose conditions, the black hole is necessarily an effective remnant, in the sense that its evaporation time is infinite. That is, the final state that there is nonzero finite temperature despite having no black hole remaining cannot be realized. We discuss the limitations, subtleties, and the implications of this result, which is reminiscent of the third law of black hole thermodynamics, but with the roles of temperature and size interchanged. We therefore refer to our result as the \complemetary third law" for black hole thermodynamics. I. INTRODUCTION: THE ISSUE WITH From here onwards, we set ~ = c = G = kB = 1, unless TEMPERATURE OF BLACK HOLE REMNANTS when explicitly restored for clarity. Note that if α ∼ O(1), as is usually considered in theoretical calculation, then In the usual picture of Hawking evaporation, an asymp- the correction term becomes important at Planck scale. totically flat Schwarzschild black hole evaporates com- It has been argued that this leads to a correction in the pletely in finite time, although the time scale is extremely Hawking temperature, resulting in a black hole remnant long for a stellar mass black hole1. Since the Hawking [12]. In this scenario however, as the evaporation stops at temperature is inversely proportional to the mass, the some finite mass, the temperature also stops at a finite, black hole becomes hotter as it shrinks. Eventually the nonzero value, see Fig.(1) below. This is somewhat pe- energy scale becomes so high that new physics could po- culiar: a positive temperature seems to suggest that the tentially enter and affect the subsequent evolution. In black hole continues to emit particle, how then does the particular, novel quantum gravity effect may put a stop evaporation completely stop? A possible interpretation is on Hawking evaporation, thus resulting in a black hole as follows: since the remnant heat capacity vanishes, there \remnant". is no thermodynamical interaction with its environment. The idea of a black hole remnant can be traced back to Therefore, it is thermodynamically inert and behaves like the work of Aharonov, Casher and Nussinov [1]. It has an elementary particle [13]. The finite remnant \temper- been suggested that black hole remnants could help to ature" should therefore be interpreted as energy of the ameliorate the black hole information paradox, though remnant (via E = kBT ). there are arguments against the very existence of rem- If one takes α < 0 in Eq.(1), we would find that there nants. See [2] for a comprehensive discussion of the debate is no lower bound for black hole mass, so in principle the and a review of various remnant scenarios. black hole can evaporate completely. However the final A popular way of obtaining a black hole remnant is temperature is finite and nonzero [14, 15], also see Fig.(1). via the generalized uncertainty principle (GUP), which Such a choice of sign of α may seem unusual, but it is incorporates the effect of gravity into the Heisenberg's consistent with some quantum gravity models in which uncertainty principle. Since GUP arises from various physics at the Planck scale \classicalized" and becomes arXiv:1812.03136v2 [gr-qc] 22 Jun 2019 general considerations involving gravity and quantum deterministic (as the RHS of the GUP equation goes to mechanics, as well as string theory [3{11], it is usually zero when ∆p · c is equal to the Planck energy) [13{16]. treated as a phenomenological approach to study various Specifically, we have seen that a lattice \spacetime crystal" properties of quantum gravity. The simplest form of GUP gives rise to such a GUP [13]. Negative GUP parameter is given by is also required if one accepts that Wick-rotation can be applied to obtain GUP-corrected black hole temperature " 2 2 # from a Schwarzschild-like black hole (with higher order 1 αLp∆p ∆x∆p > ~ + : (1) terms) [17]. More recently, it has also been shown that 2 ~ non-commutative geometry [18], as well as corpuscular gravity, give rise to negative GUP parameter [19]. In addition, even without GUP, the situation that ∆x∆p ∼ 0 is compatible with other scenarios that have lElectronic address: [email protected] been proposed in the literature, such as the possibility 1 67 A solar mass non-rotating neutral black hole takes 10 years that is a dynamical field that flows to zero in high energy to evaporate, which far exceeds the current age of the Universe ~ ∼ 1010 years. limit [20, 21]; and with Planck mass fixed in 4-dimensions, 2 evaporate completely, so there is no need to resort to the aforementioned interpretation; the black hole simply con- tinues to evaporate indefinitely (indeed its heat capacity is always negative and so it interacts thermodynamically with the environment), with temperature asymptotes to a finite nonzero value. This value is T ∗ = 1=(4πpjαj) [14, 15] (note the typo in [15]). Thus even though black hole mass is not bounded below, the black hole behaves effectively as a meta-stable remnant at late times. See Fig.(2). This behavior is due to the fact that dM= dt, though always negative, is not monotonic, and tends to zero as M ! 0. FIG. 1: The Hawking temperature of an asymptotically flat Schwarzschild black hole. The middle dashed curve corresponds to the usual picture of Hawking evaporation, which diverges as M ! 0. The divergence is removed with GUP correction. Specifically,p if α > 0, the temperature curve terminates at around M ∼ αMp, as shown by the right-most curve. If α < 0, however, GUP correction no longer imposes a lower bound on the black hole size. This corresponds to the left- most curve: the temperature remains finite as the black hole appears to shrink down to zero size. Asymptotically Safe Gravity with G ! 0 is equivalent to ~ ! 0 [22] (see also a similar proposal in f(R) gravity FIG. 2: The Hawking temperature of an asymptotically flat [23]). Incidentally, although some of the very first GUP Schwarzschild black hole with α = −1, here in black dash-dotted curve, as a function of time, shows that the temperature tends to a constant scenarios came from string theory, in which α is naturally value. The mass of the black hole, in red solid curve, tends to zero positive, it is not clear that negative α is incompatible asymptotically. In order to display both curves in the same diagram, we have multiplied the Hawking temperature by a factor of 120, so that with string theory. For example, low energy limit of string the temperature curve tends to 120T ∗ = 120=4π ≈ 9:549. theory gives rise to charged dilaton black hole, with string coupling being weak near the singularity. Though we have no right to trust this solution near the singularity, as Indeed, the fact that the black hole lifetime is infinite Horowitz put it [24], it is tempting to speculate whether can be shown analytically [15]. The evolution equation is \contrary to the usual picture of large quantum fluctuations (a minus sign in missing in [15]): and spacetime foam near the singularity, quantum effects r !4 might actually be suppressed." This would then be, at dM M 6 jαj = − 1 − 1 + : (2) least naively, compatible with the ∆x∆p ∼ 0 scenario at dt (4jαjπ)4 M 2 high energy. This can be seen as a virtue of GUP as a phenomenologi- so as M becomes sufficiently small, we have cal tool: by taking different signs of α, it can accommodate different kinds of quantum gravity models. The question dM M 2 ∼ − ; (3) is: How does one make sense of a nonzero black hole dt (4π)4α2 temperature if the black hole has completely evaporated? A possible interpretation is that this is the temperature which leads to of the Hawking radiation at the final moment just before the black hole disappears [14]. This parallels the expla- 256π4α2 M = M0 4 2 ; (4) nation for the α > 0 case, but instead of interpreting the 256π α + M0t temperature as energy of the remnant (since there is no radiation), one now takes it to be the temperature of the where M0 is the \initial" (small) mass. final emission of radiation (since there is no black hole). This leads to a natural question: how generic is this An alternative interpretation as \vacuum fluctuation” is behavior of having an infinite evaporation time when the discussed further Sec.(II). final temperature is finite and nonzero? Are there any However, in [15], a more detailed study of the evap- condition required to ensure this? Black holes are known oration process reveals that the α < 0 GUP-corrected to behave like thermodynamical systems, in particular the black hole actually takes an infinite amount of time to third law states that a black hole (of course of nonzero 3 mass) cannot reach zero temperature state in finite num- it is the geometric optic cross section that goes into the ber of steps. Here we are claiming a complementary result: Stefan-Boltzmann law, but we also absorb this correction a black hole cannot reach a state with nonzero tempera- into C, as it will not affect the qualitative behavior of the ture but zero mass.