DOCSLIB.ORG

South Metropolitan (West Norwood) Cemetery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South Metropolitan (West Norwood) Cemetery SOUTH METROPOLITAN (WEST NORWOOD) CEMETERY ADVISORY GROUP Date and Time: Wednesday 2nd July 2003, 7:00pm Venue: Nettlefold Lower Hall, Norwood High Street, SE27. Present: Jill Dudman (Archbishops Representative), Rev Luke Wickings (Archdeacons Rep), George Young (Friends of West Norwood Cemetery), Don Bianco (English Heritage), Councillor Robert McConnell (London Borough of Lambeth) and Dr B Elliott (Victorian Society) (Vice Chair) Also Robert Holden (Grave Owner), Robert Mackay (Scheme of Present: Management Committee), Ken Dry (Cemeteries and Crematoria Manager), Dick Tooze (Scheme of Management Committee), Jill O’Meara (Special Projects Officer, Lambeth Council). Mathew Toy (Atkins Water) and Richard Buck (Democratic Services Officer, London Borough of Lambeth) Apologies: Dr Robert Flanagan (Chair), Tony Farrow (Users of the Cemetery Rep), Nicholas Long (Scheme of Management Committee), Councillor Myerson, Councillor Kimm and Mike Dickens (Acting Head of Legal Services) Action to be taken 1. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS Introductions were made. In the absence of the Chair, Dr Elliot chaired the meeting and welcomed those present to the meeting. The Group AGREED to vary the order of business, NB: These minutes reflect the order of business at the meeting. 2. Minutes of the Advisory Group (02.04.03) The minutes of the meeting of the Advisory Group of the 02.04.03 were agreed as a correct record of proceedings. 3. MATTERS ARISING Signage - Don Bianco noted that in relation to signing, English Heritage might have comments on the proposed design. Concern had been expressed in respect of the West Norwood Cemetery Advisory Group – Minutes– 02.07.03 1 proposed colour scheme. Mr Bianco confirmed he sat of the Group as a representative of English Heritage although English Heritage did not wish to formally comment on the proposed signage. Greek Orthodox Graves – To date, there had been no update in respect of police investigations and the damaged crosses have been moved into the chapel. Mr Bianco confirmed that a complete condition assessment of the damaged graves would be completed by the end of the week. 4. CAPITAL WORKS PROGRAMME - PROGRESS UPDATE • Drainage - (presentation by Mr Matthew Toy of Atkins Water) Mr Toy advised that Atkins Water had been examining the general drainage situation at the Cemetery. A background investigation and topographical study had been undertaken. CCTV had also been used to investigate leakage from certain drains. Then current drainage route had been determined by the route of the River Effra when the site was constructed. The Effra had been rerouted via a culvert which may have been too undersized. The re-routed river now formed a public sewer and the end of the culvert has become partially blocked. There were indications that the early drainage system allowed for a series of openings to allow the free flow of water. Further drainage was constructed for discharging excess water into the sewer. On examination, the sewer is in relatively good condition but is heavily silted and cleaning would allow a greater outflow into the lower Bazelgette sewer. A number of smaller drainage systems were located at the north of the site and had outflows into the Effra River. On inspection, there were a number of drainage problems in the western and central part of the Cemetery, but the primary issue of concern was the eastern part of the site. The eastern wall had been replaced approximately a century ago and since then, drainage issues have caused slippage of the eastern embankment and the ditch has been backfilled obstructing a number of weep holes that were intended to allow water dispersal. More widely, there were a series of underground chambers that in some cases do not interconnect. On some maps, they are marked as wells. On examination, the drainage is heavily silted and this has a detrimental effect of the flow of excess water. The size of existing road drains was considered to be at the lower end of acceptable for this site, but the silting exacerbated flooding West Norwood Cemetery Advisory Group – Minutes– 02.07.03 2 issues. The drainage problems were particularly acute at the eastern part of the site due to the fall in land, which causes water to flow towards the eastern wall which then cannot escape. The clear weep holes are small and so do not effectively discharge the water, which puts increasing pressure on the wall. This was also causing movement of the embankment. The concrete ditch had been constructed in the late 19th or early 20th century in an attempt to alleviate drainage problems. Atkins Water had identified a number of options to resolve drainage issues at the cemetery. These were; • Repair of broken drainpipes; • High pressure jet cleaning of blocked drain pipes; • To re-instate previous drainage networks, containing collector drainpipes from low points amongst the graves in order to re-establish natural overland drainage paths; • Kerb removal in specific locations to allow the free flow of drainage overland onto roads; • An increase in the number and extent of access road drain gullies; • Increasing the extent of drains beneath existing access roads. A localised drainage system would take water from certain locations, particularly to the north and deposit in the Effra sewer. This option was the most cost effective, although there would be a difficulty in installing a pipe along the route of the failed concrete pipe. There was also the possibility of installing under the road, however the road went against the contour of the land which was a problem for a gravity based drainage system. A drainage system running through the low points of the site with a pipe overlaid with gravel at a shallow level could alleviate the drainage issues at the east of the cemetery. The pipe would need to be approximately 150mm in diameter and fin drains could be installed between graves. It would be necessary to undertake a ground radar study of this area to locate graves and establish whether this option was feasible. A drain at approximately 1 metre depth at most could follow the gradient of the land with a drop consistent with the lie of the land and would connect with the drainage system at the north of the site. The following points and issues of concern were raised by those present; • Where is the silt transported to once it has been removed West Norwood Cemetery Advisory Group – Minutes– 02.07.03 3 from the site? • Would the Council be able to undertake silt clearance on a regular basis? • A possible option would be to replace drains at the same time as maintenance and resurfacing work was carried out on the roads; • Newly dug graves have, in the past rapidly filled up with water. A point at the Dalton Path often gets boggy and waterlogged; • Why don’t the catacombs flood? Had there been any assessment of the underlying soil? • It would be sensible to assess the measures taken at other cemeteries that have experienced similar flooding issues; • Dr Elliot noted that the identification of graves with no monument was a great problem and the cost of a geo- tech survey could be significant. He considered an overlay map with the plans could achieve a reasonably accurate survey for the purposes of drainage work. However, Ordnance Survey Maps did not always tie in with actual ground features; In response, Mr Toy and officers present advised; • Drainage issues in the west of the site could be resolved by high pressure cleaning to break down the silt. Investigations had established that the silt was highly compacted. The silt would be transported by tanker to a tip site for disposal; • The Council could undertake regular silt maintenance subject to funds. A particular issue was the significant migration and movement of silt across the site; • Drainage replacement could be arranged to coincide with roadway maintenance. However, this was a relatively expensive option and has not been fully investigated; • In respect of excavated graves, the level of water logging was not surprising given that water will follow the path of least resistance. There was a significant amount of water that is naturally retained in the ground. Only approximately 10 – 30% of the total water volume runs off the surface; • The catacombs have tended not to flood due to their topographical location. In relation to soil assessment, a low intrusion investigation had been undertaken which demonstrated that the soil was of a consistent nature where it had not been disturbed due to construction; • Atkins Water has done similar work at other cemeteries. However, flooding issues were often unique to a particular location. Any solution would clearly need take account of West Norwood Cemetery Advisory Group – Minutes– 02.07.03 4 the sensitivity of the site. Dr Elliot noted that neither Kensal Green Cemetery nor Nun Head Cemetery had been the subject of the thorough investigation undertaken at West Norwood. Recent common graves were often very shallow; • The most urgent issue at the Cemetery was the movement of the eastern section of the site, which had insufficient and ineffective drainage. This was a dynamic situation, which would progressively worsen unless action was taken. The cleaning and subsequent monitoring of drainage in other parts of the site was relatively straightforward. It was not coincidence that the eastern part of the site was both the lowest lying and most prone to flooding and it would be difficult to estimate how rapidly the bank will subside in the future. The issue of drainage had been noted when work was undertaken in the early part of the last century. It would be sensible to commission a geo-tech survey of the site to identify any underlying problems; • The cost of clearing the drains in the west of the Cemetery would be approximately £25,000.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Magnificent 7 Seminars: 'Diversity in Cemeteries' 11.00-4.30 PM
    Magnificent 7 Seminars: ‘Diversity in Cemeteries’ 11.00-4.30 PM | Small Crematorium Chapel, West Norwood Cemetery 10.30 Registration, teas and coffees 11.00 Welcome and the Future of Magnificent 7 | Greg McErlean, Ruth Holmes , Nigel Thorne | The Royal Parks Panel 1: Challenges to Diversity in Cemeteries 11.15-11.30 Rules, glorious rules: Challenges in introducing Diversity at Highgate Cemetery | Ian Dungavell Friends groups are often founded to protect cemeteries. You can protect cemeteries by keeping people out, but also by welcoming them in. There is no consistent set of rules to govern appropriate behaviour in cemeteries, and notions of what is ‘respectful’ vary enormously. Having too many rules risks alienating visitors and creates problems for those who have to police them. Having no rules invites mayhem. 11.30-11.45 Diversifying Audiences in Abney Park Cemetery | Tom Simpson | Abney Park manager For those of the Magnificent Seven that no-longer operate as working cemeteries, increasing the diversity of park users and uses is crucial in preserving and protecting these unique sites. However, encouraging people to engage with spaces that are ‘full of dead people’ can be challenging. This presentation explores how Cemeteries can diversify audiences and the challenges faced when trying to attract new users to a cemetery. 11.45-12.00 Q&A: Challenges to diversity in cemeteries with Ian Dungavell and Tom Simpson. Chaired by Nigel Thorne Panel 2: Biodiversity in Cemeteries 12.00-12.15 The Green Reaper - bringing life to a Cemetery | Kenneth Greenway - Cemetery Park Manager The Friends of Tower Hamlets Cemetery Park have been involved in site management since the 1990's.
    [Show full text]
  • Caring for Historic Graveyard and Cemetery Monuments
    Caring for Historic Graveyard and Cemetery Monuments Guidance and best practice for the assessment, planning and implementation of conservation work to monuments as well as legal frameworks and statutory duties. www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications/ caring-historic-graveyard-cemetery-monuments Contents Summary 3 1 Approach 4 2 Historical background 5 Churchyards 5 Burial grounds 6 Cemeteries 6 War cemeteries and war graves 6 3 Monuments 8 Types of monuments 8 Materials 10 4 Deterioration 14 Material properties and decay characteristics 14 Structure 16 Inappropriate treatments 16 5 Legislation 19 Health and safety 19 Statutory designations 19 6 Management 20 Prioritisation of work 20 7 Inspection and assessment 21 Inspection survey process 21 Documentation 21 Condition survey and risk assessment 25 8 Practical treatment 27 Establishing priorities 27 Commissioning conservation work 27 Routine care and maintenance 27 Practical intervention 28 9 Further information 39 Funding 39 Principal sources of advice 39 Other sources of advice 41 Bibliography 41 2 Summary Monuments mark the final resting place of people DEFINITIONS whatever their origins and status.The materials, design, Monuments: throughout this document, the word craftsmanship and inscriptions of these monuments are ‘monuments’ has been used to include outdoor a rich and irreplaceable repository of information that monuments, memorials, sculptures and other symbols of connects us with previous generations and their history. commemoration They continue to be objects of respect but unfortunately, many monuments are also neglected. Churchyards: a burial ground around a church or other place of worship Many burial sites are still in use and provide us with Burial grounds: a pre-Victorian place of burial without a landscapes of cultural, historical and natural interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation on Proposed Changes and Investment Into West Norwood Cemetery (Phase 2 Consultation)
    Consultation on proposed changes and investment into West Norwood Cemetery (Phase 2 consultation) Consultation Report June 2018 Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Background West Norwood Cemetery was established by Act of Parliament in 1836 and designed by Sir William Tite. It was laid out, in what was then open countryside, close to the Great North Wood to relieve the over-full churchyards of the growing city of London. In recent years the Gothic Revival-style cemetery, which contains 69 Listed Grade II* and II memorials and structures, has faced an increasing threat to its future and long-term sustainability. With local residents and our partners we hope to address this through a National Lottery-funded project. With Heritage Lottery funding (HLF) and Lambeth’s match funding we have a budget of £441,000 to develop proposals for the Cemetery over an 18-month period, up to August 2018. If we successfully secure a HLF grant to protect and improve the cemetery, we expect work will be carried out over five years between 2019 and 2024. 1.2 Our proposals ‘West Norwood Cemetery: A New Beginning’ is a HLF-funded project that proposes conservation of the cemetery’s significant landscape and built structures and increased community use. It includes ideas for the conservation of monuments along with a new visitor centre to tell the cemetery’s history. By enhancing visitor amenities - and accessibility - we want to encourage greater use by local people, in a densely populated area, where there is a lack of open space. We aim to deliver an activities programme to support volunteering and learning as well as design digital and interpretation materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Triendi3 of Lr{Ei3f 12Orwood Jlemefery
    }triendi3 of lr{ei3f 12orwood Jlemefery NEWSLEITER NO 4: DECEMBER 1990 THE MEETING OF LAMBETH COUNCIL, 17th October 1990 At a typically lively and noisy meeting of the Full Council in October, Councillor John Whelan, and Nicholas Reed, FOWNC Chairman, asked questions of two Committee Chairmen. Councillor Stewart Hunter, Chair of Lambeth's Public Works Corrmittee said his officers were doing a splendid job, and 'Went on to take a completely political stance, accusing his first questioner of wishing to turn. the Cemetery back into a private company (something he had never mentioned). Yet in view of Lambeth I S apparent eagerness to demolish so much in the Cemetery, simply in order to provide more burial space, and thus increase the revenues received by the Cemetery, one begins to wonder if things are so very different from when the old Cemetery Companies used to maximise their burial revenues. One would have expected such behaviour from capitalist Victorian businesses 100 years ago, but one hardly expects it nowadays from a left-wing Labour Council! Lambeth declared the Cemetery a Conservation Area in 1978, This makes it also a matter for the Planning Coomittee, since tedmically, any changes made to such an area should be notified to, and approved by, the Planning Committee. In her reply, Councillor Arma Tapsell, Chair of Lambeth's Planning COIlII1i.ttee, pointed out that many Lambeth Councillors may not be aware of the decisions taken many years ago to carry out "lawn conversion" in the Cemetery. And "in view of the criticisms raised by the Friends of the Cemetery," she is asking for a detailed report on all three cemeteries to be prepared by her officers, after consulting all parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Price List – Valid for All New Funerals Arranged from 6 July 2020 Onwards
    Standard Funeral Service - £2,670 (or £2,765 including embalming) Professional Fee ............................................................................................................................................................ £1,050 • Taking all instructions and making the necessary arrangements for the funeral • Obtaining and preparing the necessary statutory documents • Liaising with cemetery/crematorium authorities • Liaising with hospitals, doctors, HM Coroner, clergy and other third parties • Providing advice on all aspects of the funeral arrangements Care of the Deceased ....................................................................................................................................................... £610 • Provision of private mortuary facilities prior to the funeral • Care of the deceased prior to the funeral • Provision of a standard white gown or dressing in clothes provided • Bereavement and aftercare assistance Vehicles and Funeral Staff ............................................................................................................................................ £1,010 • Closed hearse / private ambulance from place of death to our chapels (within a 10-mile radius of our premises) • Provision of a hearse and chauffeur on the day of the funeral • The provision of all necessary staff on the day of the funeral, including Funeral Conductor and four bearers • Provision of a limousine seating six people and chauffeur on the day of the funeral The Standard Funeral Service does not include
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and London's Victorian Cemeteries
    Geology and London’s Victorian Cemeteries Dr. David Cook Aldersbrook Geological Society 1 Contents Part 1: Introduction Page 3 Part 2: Victorian Cemeteries Page 5 Part 3: The Rocks Page 7 A quick guide to the geology of the stones used in cemeteries Part 4: The Cemeteries Page 12 Abney Park Brompton City of London East Finchley Hampstead Highgate Islington and St. Pancras Kensal Green Nunhead Tower Hamlets West Norwood Part 5: Appendix – Page 29 Notes on other cemeteries (Ladywell and Brockley, Plumstead and Charlton) Further Information (websites, publications, friends groups) Postscript 2 Geology and London’s Victorian Cemeteries Part 1: Introduction London is a huge modern city - with congested roads, crowded shopping areas and bleak industrial estates. However, it is also a city well-served by open spaces. There are numerous small parks which provide relief retreat from city life, while areas such as Richmond Park and Riverside, Hyde Park, Hampstead Heath, Epping Forest and Wimbledon Common are real recreational treasures. Although not so obviously popular, many of our cemeteries and churchyards provide a much overlooked such amenity. Many of those established in Victorian times were designed to be used as places of recreation by the public as well as places of burial. Many are still in use and remain beautiful and interesting places for quiet walks. Some, on ceasing active use for burials, have been developed as wildlife sanctuaries and community parks. As is the case with parklands, there are some especially splendid cemeteries in the capital which stand out from the rest. I would personally recommend the City of London, Islington and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthews Brothers of Staines 18 St Lawrence, Brentford
    WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY Joint Presidents: Rob and Bridget Purr Executive Committee Chairman Ann Greene 39 Broughton Avenue, Richmond, Surrey TW10 7UG [email protected] Secretary Roland Bostock Flat 8, 167 Park Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0BP [email protected] Treasurer Muriel Sprott [email protected] Membership Patricia Candler Secretary 57 The Vale, Feltham, Middlesex, TW14 0JZ [email protected] Programme Hilary Strudwick Co-ordinator [email protected] Society Archivist Yvonne Masson Editor Ann Greene 39 Broughton Avenue, Richmond, Surrey TW10 7UG [email protected] Webmaster Roland Bostock [email protected] Bookstall Manager Margaret Cunnew 25 Selkirk Road, Twickenham, Middlesex, TW2 6PS [email protected] Committee Members Brian Page, Cheryl Ford Post Holders not on the Committee Examiner David Burton Society website west-middlesex-fhs.org.uk Subscriptions All categories: £15 per annum Subscription year 1 January to 31 December If you wish to contact any of the above people, please use the postal or email address shown. In all correspondence please mark your envelope WMFHS in the upper left-hand corner; if a reply is needed, a SAE must be enclosed. Members are asked to note that receipts are only sent by request, if return postage is included. Published by West Middlesex Family History Society Registered Charity No.291906 WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY JOURNAL Volume 38 Number 1 March 2020 Contents Future Meetings 2 Want A Lift? 3 Advice Sessions 5 Annual General Meeting Agenda 6 Monthly Talks 7 A Notorious Ancestor 14 Matthews Brothers of Staines 18 St Lawrence, Brentford.
    [Show full text]
  • 23, July 1995
    FQIENDS OF WEST NOQWOOD CEMETERY NEWSLEITER NO.23: JULY 1995 Price 50 pence Free to Members Chairman's Report - Bob Flanagan olished tombs (Henry Christmas, Douglas Jerrold). We are also grateful to John Brown/Local History There has been no progress on implementing the Publications for producing the booklets to such a Land Management Strategy for the cemetery, or on high standard. Don and John have joined forces to initiating repairs either to the boundary wall or to produce a new FOWNC logo based on Tite's en• the roof of the Catacombs on the site of the Epi• trance arch. This has been used in the booklets and scopal chapel. However, I have been invited to a will appear on other FOWNC material in due meeting at the cemetery early in July to discuss course. these issues with Lambeth. By this time I hope to have obtained plans describing the planned tomb• stone restorations from English Heritage so that these can be made available for consultation in the West Norwood Cemetery's cemetery office and a notice displayed in the cem• etery to that effect. I am becoming increasingly concerned that new burials are taking place in consecrated parts of the cemetery (notably squares 78/79/90/101 and 96/97/ 107) which records show had been used for private By Bob Flanagan graves before 1965. The cemetery management did give an undertaking prior to the Consistory Court hearing that the then current practice of reselling graves would cease pending the judgement. As we know, during the hearing even Lambeth's own counsel, Mr Briden, stated in open court that this practice was illegal, a view the Chancellor endorsed in his judgement.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairman's Report
    Newsletter No. 79 – January 2014 Free to members Chairman’s Report In this Issue: Bob Flanagan The dislocation within Lambeth caused by internal • ConservationPrivate Edward Francis Hughes restructuring is slowly being resolved it seems, and there News Page 3 seems to be a willingness amongst officers to get back on (d. 1916) Page 4 track as regards agreeing a way forward for the • The Page 4 • The Bramah Cemetery, including a Heritage Lottery Fund submission. • andHenry St JohnPage 6 We are informed that a project officer is to be allocated to Families in this work in the New Year. We can but hope! Meanwhile, • John Page 9 the drainage and roadway works at the entrance to the Norwood Page 5 Cemetery continue apace, and by chance works on • Tap Page 12 • Who Made the Norwood High Street and Robson Road aimed in part at • WhiteIron Tsar House Page 13 slowing traffic speeds in the road in front of Church White? Page 7 • The Page 14 Gate have also commenced. • Sir George One rather sad item of news • Cemetery Page is that Cemetery Project 14Shenton (1842- 1909) Page 9 Officer Callum Livingstone • has returned to his native • Forthcoming EventsThe Story Page of 15 Sir New Zealand. Callum was a Henry Bessemer great supporter of FOWNC • APage Bit 13 of Mystery and helped guide the capital • Page 16 works programme through Recent FOWNC the difficult times that we Events Page 14 have faced in the last couple • of years. We wish him well, Forthcoming and in turn welcome his Events Page 15 replacement Steven Wong.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairman's Report
    Newsletter No. 101 – May 2021 Free to members Chairman’s Report In this Issue: Bob Flanagan John Bazley Good news this month is that restoration of the monu- White (1784- ment to dramatist and judge Sir Thomas Noon Talfourd 1867): Solid (1795–1854; grave 1,452, square 34) has been completed save for work on the brickwork that will be finished once Foundations (if) the weather improves. The elegant cross atop the Page 5 monument had been demolished and the vault damaged The Mabey by a falling tree (see Newsletter 87, September 2016). Sculptors : An Thanks to the Old Reding- Immense ensians Association, the Dickens Fellowship, Kev- Contribution in Crook & Jacqueline Page 10 Landy (Lambeth) and to monumental masons Row- The Curlings, land Brothers. They have The Hunters, as always done an ex- and the Dunns cellent job! Page 14 Other news is that the con- Tidying-up the tract for the roadways and drainage package of the Cemetery NHLF grant has been aw- Page 15 arded to idverde UK Ltd. However, seemingly work Forthcoming cannot start until May at Events Page 15 the earliest. Inevitably this work will be disruptive, A Bit of Mystery but a one-way traffic sys- Page 16 tem is being planned that should allow unimpeded access to all parts of the cemetery. The restored Talfourd cross Planning for the new entrances on Robson Road and at Hubbard Road continues. At Hubbard Road it is apparent that one of the original gateposts has been hit recently by a high-sided vehicle. The damage will be repaired as part of the works to enable this entrance to be reopened.
    [Show full text]
  • Addresses of Funeral Services in the London Area Containing 1. Registrars of Death by Borough 2 2. Mosques with Funeral Serv
    Addresses of Funeral Services in the London Area containing 1. Registrars of Death by Borough 2 2. Mosques with Funeral Services 8 3. Muslim Funeral Directors 16 4. Cemetery List by Borough 19 Published by Ta-Ha Publishers Ltd www.taha.co.uk 1. LONDON REGISTER OFFICES It is important to telephone the offices first as some town halls operate on an appointment only basis. Inner London boroughs City of London This service is provided by Islington Council City of Westminster Westminster Council House Marylebone Road, Westminster London, NW1 5PT 020 7641 1161/62/63 Camden Camden Register Office Camden Town Hall, Judd Street London, WC1H 9JE 020 7974 1900 Greenwich Greenwich Register office Town Hall, Wellington Street London, SE18 6PW 020 8854 8888 ext. 5015 Hackney Hackney Register Office 2 Town Hall, Mare Street London, E8 1EA 020 8356 3365 Hammersmith & Fulham Hammersmith & Fulham Register Office Fulham Town Hall, Harewood Road London, SW6 1ET 020 8753 2140 Islington Islington Register Office (and London City) Islington Town Hall, Upper Street London, N1 2UD 020 7527 6347/50/51 Kensington & Chelsea The Register Office Chelsea Old Town Hall, Kings Road London, SW3 5EE 020 7361 4100 Lambeth Lambeth Register Office, Brixton Hill, Lambeth London, SW2 1RW 020 7926 9420 Lewisham Lewisham Register Office 368 Lewisham High Street London, SE13 6LQ 020 8690 2128 3 Southwark Southwark Register Office 34 Peckham Road, Southwark London, SE5 8QA 020 7525 7651/56 Tower Hamlets Tower Hamlets Register Office Bromley Public Hall, Bow Road London, E3 3AA
    [Show full text]
  • A Self-Guided Walk Around West Norwood Cemetery
    Lives of the dead A self-guided walk around West Norwood Cemetery Explore one of London’s ‘Magnificent Seven’ cemeteries Discover why it was built and Victorian attitudes to death Find out about about some of the famous people buried there .discoveringbritain www .org ies of our land the stor scapes throug discovered h walks Created in collaboration with 2 Contents Introduction 4 Route map 5 Practical information 6 Commentary 8 Further information 46 Credits 47 © The Royal Geographical Society with the Institute of British Geographers, London, 2014 Discovering Britain is a project of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG) The digital and print maps used for Discovering Britain are licensed to the RGS-IBG from Ordnance Survey Cover image: Memorials in the Greek necropolis © Rory Walsh 3 Lives of the dead Discover how people from around the world found peace in south London Welcome to this Discovering Britain walk in West Norwood Cemetery. West Norwood was one of seven private cemeteries founded on the outskirts of London in the nineteenth century, when life expectancy was short and burial space scarce. This walk explores the cemetery to find out more about some of the View of the South Metropolitan Cemetery (1891) notable people buried here. © London Borough of Lambeth From Victorian household names to post Second World War migrants, people from many walks of life and from many countries around the world have their final resting place in West Norwood. They include royals, inventors, artists, writers, soldiers and sports heroes. On this walk you can discover some of their incredible monuments and hear their fascinating stories.
    [Show full text]