Coleoptera: Carabidae) Assemblages Within a New York State Wetland Complex

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coleoptera: Carabidae) Assemblages Within a New York State Wetland Complex J. New York Entomol. Soc. 110(1):127±141, 2002 DISTINCT GROUND BEETLE (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE) ASSEMBLAGES WITHIN A NEW YORK STATE WETLAND COMPLEX JAMES K. LIEBHERR1 AND HOJUN SONG1,2 1Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-0901 U.S.A; and 2Current address: The Ohio State University, Department of Entomology, Museum of Biological Diversity, Columbus, Ohio 43212 U.S.A. Abstract.ÐCarabid beetle communities were compared for adjacent marsh and bog biotopes at the McLean Bogs Preserve, Tompkins Co., New York by means of pitfall-trap sampling. Though the sampled marsh and bog habitats were only 200 m distant, with the umbrotrophic bog isolated from the marsh/fen complex by a Wisconsin-aged glacial esker of only 7 m ele- vation, the resident wetland carabid species assemblages differed signi®cantly between the sites during the spring and summer seasons. Of 62 species observed in the wetlands, 36 were found exclusively in the marsh biotope, 17 were exclusive to the bog site, and only 9 were found at both sites. This level of wetland habitat ®delity was maintained in spite of potential colonization of the two sites each spring by adult beetles dispersing from overwintering sites in surrounding forest edge habitats. Pitfall sampling found 59 native carabid species, of which 52 were found during a survey conducted from 1916±1925, suggesting that the McLean Bogs Preserve sup- ports locally resident populations for the vast majority of carabid species found during this study. The McLean Bogs Preserve supports geographically southern, peripheral populations of the bog-specialist Platynus mannerheimii Dejean, as well as four marsh/fen-inhabiting speciesÐ Trechus crassiscapus Lindroth, Bembidion muscicola Hayward, B. praticola Lindroth, and Bra- dycellus semipubescens LindrothÐemphasizing the role this preserve plays in maintaining the distributional ranges of both bog- and marsh-resident taxa. The distinct faunas observed in these two proximate biotopes clearly illustrate that comprehensive conservation of the carabid beetle fauna of northeastern North America should involve preservation of a variety of wetland types. Key words: ground beetles, umbrotrophic bog, fen, microhabitat, community The degree to which species utilize only particular microhabitats in a landscape profoundly impacts how preserves should be con®gured and managed to conserve biotic diversity. For wetland biotopes, the special association of particular species with particular habitat types has been demonstrated for European mires, or bogs (Kvamme, 1976; Butter®eld and Coulson, 1983; Holmes et al., 1993; Batzer and Wissinger, 1996). New World bogs have been much less comprehensively studied, with the results displaying a variety of trends. Rosenberg et al. (1988) found a high level of habitat speci®city, but relatively low levels of taxonomic diversity for chi- ronomid midges in Ontario peatlands. Conversely, Runtz and Peck (1994), studying a late-successional bog in Ontario, report only a single bog-speci®c carabid beetle species±Platynus mannerheimii Dejean±among the 14 species observed. They char- acterized the bog-habitat species assemblage as derivative of adjacent forest habitats. FraÈmbs (1994) compared a Swedish plateau bog with various bog formations in Maine and New York, U.S.A., ®nding that highest carabid beetle diversity and abun- 128 JOURNAL OF THE NEW YORK ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY Vol. 110(1) Fig. 1. A. Location of McLean Bogs Preserve in New York state, U.S.A. B. Local topog- raphy within Preserve near sample sites, redrawn from MSSCU (1926): ll 5 marsh trap transect, 11 5 Bog A trap transect. Contours indicate 10 ft (3.05 m) changes in elevation. dance were supported by bogs exhibiting a hummock-hollow mosaic of microhabi- tats, thereby allowing individuals to overwinter in the bog habitat. Such situations are obviously of maximal importance in expansive bogs characteristic of Canada and Maine (Johnson, 1985; Damman, 1995). As with earlier studies (Kvamme, 1976; Mossakowski, 1977), FraÈmbs found the European carabid beetle, Agonum ericeti (Panzer) to be an extreme bog-habitat specialist, most at home on the open sphagnum lawn of the Swedish Ryggmossen. His northeastern North American sampling did not indicate that any North American species exhibited such ®delity to bog habitats, though Agonum ericeti's sister species, Agonum belleri Hatch, has been long known as a sphagnum bog specialist of the North American Paci®c northwest (Hatch, 1933; Lindroth, 1966; Schreiner, 1978). Capitalizing on the advantages associated with a long-term ecological preserveÐ access to a variety of well-conserved habitat types (Needham, 1921), and an histor- ical record of taxonomic diversity (Members of the Scienti®c Staff Cornell Univer- sity [MSSCU] 1926, Leng, 1928)Ðwe undertook the study of a wetland complex consisting of adjacent fen-fed marsh and umbrotrophic bog microhabitats at McLean Bogs Preserve, Tompkins Co., New York (Fig. 1). We set out to answer two ques- tions: (1) what is the carabid beetle species composition in the fen and bog, and does this composition differ signi®cantly between the two habitats; and (2) have the species assemblages found in these habitats changed signi®cantly during the 75 years since the initial biotic survey? The preserve encompasses upland old growth hardwood forest, a complex of fens and ponds fed by runoff and springs ¯owing through glacial deposits, and various acidic bogs, including a topographically isolated umbrotrophic bog, plus a second bog that grades into surrounding marshland via wooded swamp. The isolated um- brotrophic bog and fen-stream fed marshland are separated by an esker ridge ap- proximately 100 m wide and7minheight, permitting comparable sampling on a 2002 WETLAND GROUND BEETLE ASSEMBLAGES (COLEOPTERA) 129 local scale to determine whether any differences in the biota of these microhabitats persist in the face of extreme geographic proximity. We focused on the carabid beetle assemblages associated with the umbrotrophic bog and alkaline marshlands. Carabid beetles offer the advantages of an extensive literature on taxonomy, biology, and habitat preference (e.g., Lindroth, 1945; 1961±1969a), and relatively high numerical abundance within wetland habitats (e.g., Runtz and Peck, 1994). We demonstrate that signi®cant differences exist between carabid assemblages occupying the bog and marshland habitats at McLean Preserve, with both habitat types supporting geograph- ically peripheral populations of carabid species. We also report that the species as- semblages found in this study are consistent with species reported from the preserve 75 years ago. These ®ndings establish for North America the importance of pre- serving a variety of wetland habitat types in situations such as the McLean Bogs Preserve, in order to comprehensively conserve the breadth of taxonomic diversity across the Carabidae, and by extension, other less well-studied wetland insect groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS Carabid beetle sampling was undertaken at the McLean Bogs Natural Area, a 40.5 hectare old-growth preserve situated in the Beaver Creek drainage, extreme north- eastern Tompkins Co., New York (428329480N, 0768169010W, Fig. 1A). The preserve centers on an alkaline marsh biotope surrounding Mud Pond (Fig. 1B). Both surface- fed streams and springs associated with glacial deposits drain into the marsh and pond. Demand for carbon dioxide in Mud Pond periodically removes all CO2 from solution, with resultant deposition of marl characterizing portions of the pond basin. Alkaline conditions (pH 5 8.4±9.4) have been reported in Mud Pond in August (Chamot and Georgia, 1926). Due to impoundment by a glacial esker, an umbro- trophic kettlehole bog±Bog A (Fig. 1B)±lies within 200 m of Mud Pond. A second transitional or oligotrophic bog (Johnson, 1985)±Bog B±drains circuitously into Ar- gus Brook, which lies at the north end of the basin occupied by Mud Pond. Hydrogen ion concentrations are such that pH values range from 3.7±4.4 at various times in the bogs (Chamot and Georgia, 1926). We conducted pitfall sampling at a marsh site on the northwest margin of Mud Pond (Fig. 1B), and a bog site near the northeast margin of Bog A. Five 9.4 cm diameter pitfall traps, covered by a suspended plastic plate, were arrayed at 3±5 m intervals (FraÈmbs, 1994). Each transect started at the forest edge and extended into the respective wetland habitat. Each trap was ¯anked by two 0.3 m long plastic sections of lawn edging, placed 1808 to each other, the cardinal direction determined by roots surrounding the pitfall cup; i.e., contingent on the most local conditions. The forest-edge trap was placed at the extreme margin of terra ®rma forest soil that was rarely inundated. The four wetland traps at each site were placed in the marsh or in the sphagnum carpet of the bog, either under the canopy of emergent shrubs, or along the edges of hummocks, thereby minimizing ¯ooding of the traps by rising water. Traps were half-®lled with ethylene glycol (1999) and propylene glycol (2000), and emptied on an approximate weekly schedule (shortened or lengthened slightly depending on weather conditions). Trapping was initiated 10 June 1999 and continued until 12 September 1999. Based on results of the ®rst year, a second spring season of sampling was started 19 April 2000 and ®nished 12 June 2000, thereby 130 JOURNAL OF THE NEW YORK ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY Vol. 110(1) producing data for the two sites that span ®ve months characterized by the warmest nighttime temperatures over the year. The marsh biotope surrounding Mud Pond consists of a shrubby quaking matÐ locally called a grass bog (Needham and Claassen, 1926)±consisting of tussock- forming grasses and sedges. The dominant shrubby vegetation on the mat includes speckled alder (Alnus rugosa), red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea), and silky willow (Salix sericea). Bog A is surrounded by tall trees±beech (Fagus grandifolia), hem- lock (Tsuga canadensis), and sugar maple (Acer saccharum) dominating±with a well-developed root mat resulting in a hummocky shoreline.
Recommended publications
  • Viability of Ground Beetle Populations in Fragmented Heathlands
    Viability of ground beetle populations in fragmented heathlands Henk de Vries Promotoren: Dr. L. Brussaard Hoogleraar in de Bodembiologie Dr. W. van Delden Hoogleraar in de Populatiegenetica Rijksuniversiteit Groningen Co-promotor: Dr. Th. S. van Dijk Universitair docent Biologisch Station Wijster Viability of ground beetle populations in fragmented heathlands H. H. de Vries Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van de Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen, Dr. C. M. Karssen, in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 30 oktober 1996 des namiddags te vier uur in de Aula. t/)H cs"ic>zy>b LANDïîOUVV UXI VERSIT3T T ISBN 90-5485-586-X Printed on Challenger, 100% recycled paper This thesis has been accomplished at: Biological Station Wijster Wageningen Agricultural University Kampsweg 27 9418 PD Wijster The Netherlands Abstract Numbers of ground beetle species that are characteristic for heathlands were negatively associated with area, whereas this relationship was not found for the total number of ground beetle species or for unspecialised ground beetle species. In particular the number of heathland species with low dispersal ability was strongly related to area. Transplant experiments showed that some heathland species with low dispersal ability experienced reduced habitat quality in small habitats, whereas for others at least part of the unoccupied areas were of sufficient quality for successful reproduction. From the presence of occupied as well as unoccupied habitats and from knowledge on its possibilities for dispersal, it is inferred that Pterostichus lepidus lives in metapopulations with continuously and discontinuously occupied patches. Using allozymes, high levels of genetic variation were found in P.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of the Tribe Platynini in New Zealand (Coleoptera: Carabidae)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 3-30-2021 Synopsis of the tribe Platynini in New Zealand (Coleoptera: Carabidae) André Larochelle Marie-Claude Larivière Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. A journal of world insect systematics INSECTA MUNDI 0864 Synopsis of the tribe Platynini in New Zealand Page Count: 96 (Coleoptera: Carabidae) André Larochelle and Marie-Claude Larivière Larochelle and Larivière New Zealand Arthropod Collection, Manaaki Whenua–Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland 1142, New Zealand Prosphodrus waimana Larochelle and Larivière, new species Date of issue: April 30, 2021 Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc., Gainesville, FL Larochelle A, Larivière M-C. 2021. Synopsis of the tribe Platynini in New Zealand (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Insecta Mundi 0864: 1–96. Published on April 30, 2021 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc. P.O. Box 141874 Gainesville, FL 32614-1874 USA http://centerforsystematicentomology.org/ Insecta Mundi is a journal primarily devoted to insect systematics, but articles can be published on any non- marine arthropod. Topics considered for publication include systematics, taxonomy, nomenclature, checklists, faunal works, and natural history. Insecta Mundi will not consider works in the applied sciences (i.e. medi- cal entomology, pest control research, etc.), and no longer publishes book reviews or editorials.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Factors Affecting the Diversity of Sphagnum Cover Inhabitants with the Focus on Ground Beetle Assemblages in Central-Eastern European Peat Bogs
    COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 20(1): 45-52, 2019 1585-8553 © AKADÉMIAI KIADÓ, BUDAPEST DOI: 10.1556/168.2019.20.1.5 Key factors affecting the diversity of Sphagnum cover inhabitants with the focus on ground beetle assemblages in Central-Eastern European peat bogs G. Sushko Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Vitebsk State University P. M. Masherov, Moskovski Ave. 33, 21008 Vitebsk, Belarus. E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Belarus, Carabidae, diversity, environmental factors, Sphagnum dwellers. Abstract. A key structural component in peat bog formation is Sphagnum spp., which determines very specific associated envi- ronmental conditions. The aim of this study was to characterise some of the key factors affecting the diversity, species richness and abundance of sphagnum inhabiting ground beetles and to examine the maintenance of stable populations of cold adapted specialised peat bog species. A total of 52 carabid species were recorded by pitfall traps along six main habitats, such as the lagg zone, pine bog, hollows, hummock open bog and dome. The results are characterised by a low diversity, which vary significantly among habitat types, and include a high abundance of a few carabid species. Among the variables influencing carabid species richness and abundance were plant cover, pH and the conductivity of the Sphagnum mat water. Vascular plant cover was a key factor shaping carabid beetle assemblages in the slope and the dome, while electric conductivity affected carabid beetle assem- blage in the lagg. Whereas, the water level was the most important factor for the hollows. At the same time, peat bog specialists showed low sensitivity to the gradient of the analysed variables.
    [Show full text]
  • The Compositional and Configurational Heterogeneity of Matrix Habitats Shape Woodland Carabid Communities in Wooded-Agricultural Landscapes
    The compositional and configurational heterogeneity of matrix habitats shape woodland carabid communities in wooded-agricultural landscapes Article Accepted Version Neumann, J. L., Griffiths, G. H., Hoodless, A. and Holloway, G. J. (2016) The compositional and configurational heterogeneity of matrix habitats shape woodland carabid communities in wooded-agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 31 (2). pp. 301-315. ISSN 0921-2973 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0244-y Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/46912/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0244-y Publisher: Springer All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online The compositional and configurational heterogeneity of matrix habitats shape woodland carabid communities in wooded- agricultural landscapes. Jessica L. Neumann1,3*, Geoffrey H. Griffiths1, Andrew Hoodless2 and Graham J. Holloway3 1 Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Reading, Reading, UK 2 Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, Fordingbridge, Hampshire, UK 3 Centre for Wildlife Assessment and Conservation, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK Abstract Context Landscape heterogeneity (the composition and configuration of matrix habitats) plays a major role in shaping species communities in wooded-agricultural landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) Assemblages in a North American Sub-Boreal Forest
    Forest Ecology and Management 256 (2008) 1104–1123 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Catastrophic windstorm and fuel-reduction treatments alter ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages in a North American sub-boreal forest Kamal J.K. Gandhi a,b,1, Daniel W. Gilmore b,2, Steven A. Katovich c, William J. Mattson d, John C. Zasada e,3, Steven J. Seybold a,b,* a Department of Entomology, 219 Hodson Hall, 1980 Folwell Avenue, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA b Department of Forest Resources, 115 Green Hall, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA c USDA Forest Service, State and Private Forestry, 1992 Folwell Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA d USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 5985 Hwy K, Rhinelander, WI 54501, USA e USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 1831 Hwy 169E, Grand Rapids, MN 55744, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: We studied the short-term effects of a catastrophic windstorm and subsequent salvage-logging and Received 9 September 2007 prescribed-burning fuel-reduction treatments on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages in a Received in revised form 8 June 2008 sub-borealforestinnortheasternMinnesota,USA. During2000–2003, 29,873groundbeetlesrepresentedby Accepted 9 June 2008 71 species were caught in unbaited and baited pitfall traps in aspen/birch/conifer (ABC) and jack pine (JP) cover types. At the family level, both land-area treatment and cover type had significant effects on ground Keywords: beetle trap catches, but there were no effects of pinenes and ethanol as baits.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrates
    State Wildlife Action Plan Update Appendix A-5 Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fact Sheets INVERTEBRATES Conservation Status and Concern Biology and Life History Distribution and Abundance Habitat Needs Stressors Conservation Actions Needed Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 2015 Appendix A-5 SGCN Invertebrates – Fact Sheets Table of Contents What is Included in Appendix A-5 1 MILLIPEDE 2 LESCHI’S MILLIPEDE (Leschius mcallisteri)........................................................................................................... 2 MAYFLIES 4 MAYFLIES (Ephemeroptera) ................................................................................................................................ 4 [unnamed] (Cinygmula gartrelli) .................................................................................................................... 4 [unnamed] (Paraleptophlebia falcula) ............................................................................................................ 4 [unnamed] (Paraleptophlebia jenseni) ............................................................................................................ 4 [unnamed] (Siphlonurus autumnalis) .............................................................................................................. 4 [unnamed] (Cinygmula gartrelli) .................................................................................................................... 4 [unnamed] (Paraleptophlebia falcula) ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Biodiversity in a Modified Landscape Charlotte Louise Owen
    Mapping biodiversity in a modified landscape Charlotte Louise Owen 2008 Athesissubmittedinpartialfulfilmentofthe requirementsforthedegreeofMasterofScienceandthe DiplomaofImperialCollegeLondon Contents Abstract 1 1. Introduction 2 1.1Conservationinmodifiedlandscapes 2 1.2Mapping biodiversityatthe landscapescale 2 1.3Projectaimsandobjectives 4 2. Background 5 2.1Betadiversity 5 2.2Characteristicsofmodifiedlandscapes 6 2.3Carabidsasa bioindicator 8 2.4Carabidsinmodifiedlandscapes 9 2.5Thestudysite 11 3. Methods 13 3.1Selectionofsamplingsites 13 3.2Fieldsampling 14 3.3Environmentalvariables 15 3.4Statisticalanalysis 15 3.4.1Diversityindices 15 3.4.2Fragmentationandedgeeffects 16 3.4.3Carabidspecies assemblages 17 3.4.4Modellingcarabiddiversityatthelandscapescale 17 i 4. Results 18 4.1Abundance 18 4.2Diversityandevenness 20 4.3Fragmentationeffects 21 4.4Edgeeffectsacross transects 22 4.5Carabidspecies assemblages 24 4.6Predictedspeciesdiversity 27 4.7Predictedbetadiversity–generalizeddissimilaritymodelling 27 5. Discussion 30 5.1Carabidspeciesdiversity,evennessandabundance 30 5.2Edgeeffects 31 5.3Carabidspecies assemblages 32 5.4Predictedspeciesdiversity 33 5.5Predictedbetadiversity 34 6. References 37 7. Acknowledgements 46 8. Appendix 47 ii Abstract Themajorityoftheworld’s biodiversityexistsoutside protectedareas,inlandscapes heavilymodifiedbyanthropogenic activity.Itis thereforenecessarytogaina better understandingoftherolethatmodifiedlandscapes playinthemaintenanceof biodiversity.Theapplicationofmethodsusedtoassessandprioritiseareasfor
    [Show full text]
  • ES Teacher Packet.Indd
    PROCESS OF EXTINCTION When we envision the natural environment of the Currently, the world is facing another mass extinction. past, one thing that may come to mind are vast herds However, as opposed to the previous five events, and flocks of a great diversity of animals. In our this extinction is not caused by natural, catastrophic modern world, many of these herds and flocks have changes in environmental conditions. This current been greatly diminished. Hundreds of species of both loss of biodiversity across the globe is due to one plants and animals have become extinct. Why? species — humans. Wildlife, including plants, must now compete with the expanding human population Extinction is a natural process. A species that cannot for basic needs (air, water, food, shelter and space). adapt to changing environmental conditions and/or Human activity has had far-reaching effects on the competition will not survive to reproduce. Eventually world’s ecosystems and the species that depend on the entire species dies out. These extinctions may them, including our own species. happen to only a few species or on a very large scale. Large scale extinctions, in which at least 65 percent of existing species become extinct over a geologically • The population of the planet is now growing by short period of time, are called “mass extinctions” 2.3 people per second (U.S. Census Bureau). (Leakey, 1995). Mass extinctions have occurred five • In mid-2006, world population was estimated to times over the history of life on earth; the first one be 6,555,000,000, with a rate of natural increase occurred approximately 440 million years ago and the of 1.2%.
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalogue of Lithuanian Beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera) 1 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.121.732 Catalogue Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 121: 1–494 (2011) A catalogue of Lithuanian beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera) 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.121.732 CATALOGUE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A catalogue of Lithuanian beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera) Vytautas Tamutis1, Brigita Tamutė1,2, Romas Ferenca1,3 1 Kaunas T. Ivanauskas Zoological Museum, Laisvės al. 106, LT-44253 Kaunas, Lithuania 2 Department of Biology, Vytautas Magnus University, Vileikos 8, LT-44404 Kaunas, Lithuania 3 Nature Research Centre, Institute of Ecology, Akademijos 2, LT-08412 Vilnius, Lithuania Corresponding author: Vytautas Tamutis ([email protected]) Academic editor: Lyubomir Penev | Received 6 November 2010 | Accepted 17 May 2011 | Published 5 August 2011 Citation: Tamutis V, Tamutė B, Ferenca R (2011) A catalogue of Lithuanian beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera). ZooKeys 121: 1–494. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.121.732 Abstract This paper presents the first complete and updated list of all 3597 species of beetles (Insecta: Coleop- tera) belonging to 92 families found and published in Lithuania until 2011, with comments also pro- vided on the main systematic and nomenclatural changes since the last monograic treatment (Pileckis and Monsevičius 1995, 1997). The introductory section provides a general overview of the main features of territory of the Lithuania, the origins and formation of the beetle fauna and their conservation, the faunistic investigations in Lithuania to date revealing the most important stages of the faunistic research process with reference to the most prominent scientists, an overview of their work, and their contribution to Lithuanian coleopteran faunal research. Species recorded in Lithuania by some authors without reliable evidence and requiring further confir- mation with new data are presented in a separate list, consisting of 183 species.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon
    Portland State University PDXScholar Institute for Natural Resources Publications Institute for Natural Resources - Portland 8-2016 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon James S. Kagan Portland State University Sue Vrilakas Portland State University, [email protected] John A. Christy Portland State University Eleanor P. Gaines Portland State University Lindsey Wise Portland State University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/naturalresources_pub Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Oregon Biodiversity Information Center. 2016. Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon. Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon. 130 pp. This Book is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Institute for Natural Resources Publications by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors James S. Kagan, Sue Vrilakas, John A. Christy, Eleanor P. Gaines, Lindsey Wise, Cameron Pahl, and Kathy Howell This book is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/naturalresources_pub/25 RARE, THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF OREGON OREGON BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION CENTER August 2016 Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Institute for Natural Resources Portland State University P.O. Box 751,
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Insects in Eastern Oregon and Washington Forests and Adiacent Lands
    JamesR. LaBonte, P ant D v s on OregonDepartrnent of Agr cu ture 635Capto NE Sae.n,Oregon97810email j abonte@odastate or.us DonaldW Scott, B ue Mountans Pestlvlanagement Serv ce Center,USDA Forest Service, 140T Geke er Lane.La Grande,Oregon 97850 James D. Mclver and Jane Leslie Hayes,Pacfic NorthwestResearch Staton Forestryand Fange Scences LaboratorvT40T GekeLer Lane La Grande Oregon97850 Threatened,Endangered, and SensitiveInsects in EasternOregon and WashingtonForests and AdiacentLands Abstract lnsecrspla) an inrcgral role in ihe heald of lbrest ecosystens. While mosl insect spcciesin easiernOregon and [ishington forestsare presumcdto be abundantand secure.some may bc rare or in decline.Accounts are given lbr iltcen east-sideforesl insed speciescurrenrly listed as threatcned.endangered. or rensitile (TES). We discussreasons for thcir listjng, \\'hich includc peripheralpopulations. relict spccics.species with resficted habitatsor hosls. and endemi( \peLi(\ Wherherlhc nccdsofcurently listcd TES east-sideibrest insectsare being met by cuffent managementpracdces can onl) be ascenainedil adequateinforDarion is availableon their distribuiion. abundance.habital requiremenls,and biologies. However' thjs infofmation is lacking for many specics.For instance.i\c of lhe TES speciesdiscussed in ibis paper have poorly known di\tributions, andbeucr information may changctheir status.Applicatjon ofgeneral principlcsforthe conser!adonofinvertebrale di\crsj!y andfunctions na,v help prevento$ercas! sideforest inseclsliom acquiringlederal or stateTESclassiiicalion and could aid spcciesalreadl lisred. Manl' pracricesalrcady undenakenb,,- lcdcral land m.rnagersma! be helping to prolec! TES popula- lions and habirar.Spcciiic managemenlpractices, such as preserlalion of key habrlu|sat risk of degfadalionor alteration (e.9., springs and sphagnun bogs), may be ncccssarl,to prevenr fic dccljne or local extinction of someTES insccls.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 42 Numbers 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2009 Numbers Article 3 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2009 April 2009 An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Peter W. Messer Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Messer, Peter W. 2009. "An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 42 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol42/iss1/3 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Messer: An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: C 30 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 42, Nos. 1 & 2 An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Peter W. Messer1 Abstract A survey of Carabidae in the state of Wisconsin, U.S.A. yielded 87 species new to the state and incorporated 34 species previously reported from the state but that were not included in an earlier catalogue, bringing the total number of species to 489 in an annotated checklist. Collection data are provided in full for the 87 species new to Wisconsin but are limited to county occurrences for 187 rare species previously known in the state. Recent changes in nomenclature pertinent to the Wisconsin fauna are cited. ____________________ The Carabidae, commonly known as ‘ground beetles’, with 34, 275 described species worldwide is one of the three most species-rich families of extant beetles (Lorenz 2005).
    [Show full text]