DOCSLIB.ORG

Wallowa 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wallowa 2020 Wallowa Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan February 27, 2020 Developed by the Oregon Department of Agriculture and the Wallowa Local Advisory Committee with support from the Wallowa Soil and Water Conservation District Oregon Department of Agriculture Wallowa SWCD Water Quality Program 401 NE 1st Street Suite E 635 Capitol St. NE Enterprise, Oregon 97828 Salem, OR 97301 541-456-4521 Phone: (503) 986-4700 Website: oda.direct/AgWQPlans (This page is blank) Table of Contents Acronyms and Terms .................................................................................................................................... i Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................ iii Required Elements of Area Plans ......................................................................................................... iii Plan Content.................................................................................................................................................. iii Chapter 1: Agricultural Water Quality Program ........................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of Agricultural Water Quality Program and Applicability of Area Plans...... 1 1.2 History of the Ag Water Quality Program .............................................................................. 1 1.3 Roles and Responsibilities ......................................................................................................... 2 1.3.1 Oregon Department of Agriculture ......................................................................................................................2 1.3.2 Local Management Agency .....................................................................................................................................5 1.3.3 Local Advisory Committee ......................................................................................................................................5 1.3.4 Agricultural Landowners ........................................................................................................................................5 1.3.5 PuBlic Participation ...................................................................................................................................................6 1.4 Agricultural Water Quality ......................................................................................................... 6 1.4.1 Point and Nonpoint Sources of Water Pollution .............................................................................................6 1.4.2 Beneficial Uses and Parameters of Concern .....................................................................................................6 1.4.3 Impaired WaterBodies and Total Maximum Daily Loads.............................................................................7 1.4.4 Oregon Water Pollution Control Law – ORS 468B.025 and 468B.050 ....................................................7 1.4.5 Streamside Vegetation and Agricultural Water Quality ...............................................................................8 1.4.6 Soil Health and Agricultural Water Quality ......................................................................................................9 1.5 Other Water Quality Programs ................................................................................................. 9 1.5.1 Confined Animal Feeding Operation Program .................................................................................................9 1.5.2 Groundwater Management Areas ..................................................................................................................... 10 1.5.3 The Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds .............................................................................................. 10 1.5.4 Pesticide Management and Stewardship ........................................................................................................ 10 1.5.5 Drinking Water Source Protection .................................................................................................................... 11 1.6 Partner Agencies and Organizations .....................................................................................11 1.6.1 Oregon Department of Environmental Quality ............................................................................................ 11 1.6.2 Other Partners ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 1.7 Measuring Progress ...................................................................................................................12 1.7.1 MeasuraBle OBjectives .......................................................................................................................................... 12 1.7.2 Land Conditions and Water Quality ................................................................................................................. 12 1.7.3 Focused Implementation in Small Geographic Areas ................................................................................. 13 1.8 Progress and Adaptive Management.....................................................................................13 1.8.1 Biennial Reviews ..................................................................................................................................................... 13 1.8.2 Water Quality Monitoring .................................................................................................................................... 14 Chapter 2: Local Background ........................................................................................................... 15 2.1 Local Roles ....................................................................................................................................16 2.1.1 Local Advisory Committee ................................................................................................................................... 16 2.1.2 Local Management Agency .................................................................................................................................. 16 2.2 Area Plan and Area Rules: Development and History ......................................................16 2.3 Geographical and Physical Setting .........................................................................................16 2.3.1 Geographic Area ...................................................................................................................................................... 16 Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan February 2020 2.3.2 Climate........................................................................................................................................................................ 17 2.3.3 Land Use..................................................................................................................................................................... 17 2.3.4 Environmental Benefits of Agricultural Production ................................................................................... 18 2.3.5 Relation to Fish Recovery Plans......................................................................................................................... 18 2.4 Agricultural Water Quality .......................................................................................................20 2.4.1 Water Quality Issues .............................................................................................................................................. 20 2.4.1.1 Beneficial Uses ................................................................................................................................................... 20 2.4.1.2 WQ Parameters and 303(d) list.................................................................................................................... 20 2.4.1.3 TMDLs and Agricultural Load Allocations ................................................................................................ 20 2.4.1.4 Drinking Water .................................................................................................................................................. 20 2.4.2 Sources of Impairment .......................................................................................................................................... 21 2.5 Regulatory and Voluntary Measures .....................................................................................24 2.5.1 Sheet and Rill Erosion ........................................................................................................................................... 25 2.5.2 Excessive Gully Erosion ........................................................................................................................................ 26 2.5.3 StreamBank Erosion .............................................................................................................................................. 26 2.5.4 Streamside and Riparian Vegetation................................................................................................................ 27 2.5.5 Waste Management ...............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon – 2011
    Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon – 2011 Submitted by The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. Title: Monitoring Wolverine in Northeast Oregon – 2011 Authors: Audrey J. Magoun, Patrick Valkenburg, Clinton D. Long, and Judy K. Long Funding and Logistical Support: Dale Pedersen James Short Marsha O’Dell National Park Service Norcross Wildlife Foundation Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Seattle Foundation The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. U.S. Forest Service Wildlife Conservation Society Special thanks to all those individuals who provided observations of wolverines in the Wallowa- Whitman National Forest and other areas in Oregon. We also thank Tim Hiller, Mark Penninger, and Glenn McDonald for their assistance in the field work. This document should be cited as: Magoun, A. J., P. Valkenburg, C. D. Long, and J. K. Long. 2011. Monitoring wolverines in northeast Oregon – 2011. Final Report. The Wolverine Foundation, Inc., Kuna, Idaho, USA. 2 INTRODUCTION The Oregon Conservation Strategy lists “species data gaps” and “research and monitoring needs” for some species where basic information on occurrence and habitat associations are not known (ODFW 2006; pages 367-368). For the Blue Mountains, East Cascades, and West Cascades Ecoregions of Oregon, the Strategy lists wolverine as a species for which status is unknown but habitat may be suitable to support wolverines. ODFW lists the wolverine as Threatened in Oregon and the USFWS has recently placed the species on the candidate list under the federal Endangered Species Act. Wolverine range in the contiguous United States had contracted substantially by the mid-1900s, probably because of high levels of human-caused mortality and very low immigration rates (Aubry et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon
    Monitoring Wolverines in Northeast Oregon January 2011 – December 2012 Final Report Authors: Audrey J. Magoun Patrick Valkenburg Clinton D. Long Judy K. Long Submitted to: The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. February 2013 Cite as: A. J. Magoun, P. Valkenburg, C. D. Long, and J. K. Long. 2013. Monitoring wolverines in northeast Oregon. January 2011 – December 2012. Final Report. The Wolverine Foundation, Inc., Kuna, Idaho. [http://wolverinefoundation.org/] Copies of this report are available from: The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. [http://wolverinefoundation.org/] Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife [http://www.dfw.state.or.us/conservationstrategy/publications.asp] Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation [http://www.owhf.org/] U. S. Forest Service [http://www.fs.usda.gov/land/wallowa-whitman/landmanagement] Major Funding and Logistical Support The Wolverine Foundation, Inc. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation U. S. Forest Service U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Wolverine Discovery Center Norcross Wildlife Foundation Seattle Foundation Wildlife Conservation Society National Park Service 2 Special thanks to everyone who provided contributions, assistance, and observations of wolverines in the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest and other areas in Oregon. We appreciate all the help and interest of the staffs of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation, U. S. Forest Service, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wildlife Conservation Society, and the National Park Service. We also thank the following individuals for their assistance with the field work: Jim Akenson, Holly Akenson, Malin Aronsson, Norma Biggar, Ken Bronec, Steve Bronson, Roblyn Brown, Vic Coggins, Alex Coutant, Cliff Crego, Leonard Erickson, Bjorn Hansen, Mike Hansen, Hans Hayden, Tim Hiller, Janet Hohmann, Pat Matthews, David McCullough, Glenn McDonald, Jamie McFadden, Kendrick Moholt, Mark Penninger, Jens Persson, Lynne Price, Brian Ratliff, Jamie Ratliff, John Stephenson, John Wyanens, Rebecca Watters, Russ Westlake, and Jeff Yanke.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Invasives Rapid Response Environmental Assessment
    DRAFT DREISSENID MUSSEL RAPID RESPONSE ACTION PLAN PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division PPLPL-C-2018-0062 July 2019 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background Information ..................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Dreissenid Mussel Presence and Life History in North American ................ 2 1.1.2 Invasion Risk ............................................................................................... 4 1.1.3 Effects of the Establishment of Dreissenid Mussels in the Four State Area 7 1.1.4 Current Prevention Efforts ......................................................................... 13 1.1.5 Need for coordinated action and path forward ........................................... 14 1.1.6 Authority .................................................................................................... 15 1.2 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................... 16 2 Alternatives ............................................................................................................ 17 2.1 Alternative 1 – No Action (Current Practice)..................................................... 17 2.1.1 Action Area ................................................................................................ 18 2.1.2 Alternative Description ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Variations in Water Quality and Recreational Use Along the Upper Wallowa River and Selected Tributaries
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Theodore R. McDowellfor the degree ofDoctor of Philosophy in Geography presented on December 21, 1979 Title:Geographic Variations in Water Quality and Recreational Use Along the Upper Wallowa River and Selected Tributaries Abstract approved: Redacted for privacy Assistant Pro(sp)sornarl es Rosenfeld Physical, chemical and bacterial water quality parameters of the upper Wallowa River were sampled periodically between July 2, 1978 and June 9, 1979 at nine stream and lake sampling sites.Water upstream from Wallowa Lake was typified by low nutrient concentra- tions ( generally below detectable limits except for nitrates), low. specific conductivity (50-99 micromhos), and water temperatures below 15°C.Results of bacterial sampling were inconclusive, but sites and areas warranting further study were identified. An intensive study of spatial variations in bacterial water quality and recreational use was conducted at 15 stream and lake sampling sites on the East Fork of the Wallowa River between July 5 and September 3, 1979.Streamflow, precipitation, water temperatures, and fecal coliform bacteria counts were determined two or three times per week and during storm events.Levels and patterns of recreational use were also monitored during that period.Fecal coliform counts varied significantly (at the 0.001 p level) with geographic patterns of recreational use, but there was no significant relationship between levels of recreational use.Bacterial water quality also varied signi- ficantly (at the 0.001 p level) between
    [Show full text]
  • Nez Perce Tribe Nacó'x ̣(Chinook Salmon) and Héeyey (Steelhead
    Nez Perce Tribe Nacó’x ̣(Chinook salmon) and Héeyey (Steelhead) Adult Escapement and Spawning Ground Survey 2010 Summary Report Prepared by: Adult Technical Team Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management Fisheries Research Division Lapwai, ID 83540 May 2011 Nez Perce Tribe Nacó’x ̣(Chinook salmon) and Héeyey (steelhead) Adult Escapement and Spawning Ground Survey 2010 Summary Report Prepared by: Adult Technical Team Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management Fisheries Research Division Lapwai, ID 83540 This document should be cited as follows: Adult Technical Team. 2011. Nez Perce Tribe Nacó’x ̣(Chinook salmon) and Héeyey (steelhead) adult escapement and spawning ground survey 2010 summary report. Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management, Fisheries Research Division. Lapwai, ID INTRODUCTION This document summarizes adult spring, summer, and fall Nacó’x ̣(Chinook salmon) and Héeyey (steelhead) population estimates and spawning ground survey information collected on streams surveyed by the Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management (DFRM) during 2010. The purpose of this document is to provide resource assessment information to co-managers on a timely basis. Data collection is conducted under multiple contracts with specific project objectives and study designs. Methods have been standardized to assure accurate characterization of basic performance measures (Beasley et al. 2008). The reader is directed to project specific annual reports for a detailed description of methods used for calculation of performance measures. Adult spring and summer Nacó’x ̣(Chinook salmon) escapement estimates are presented from six streams where adult monitoring sites are located. Age 3 to 5 adult Chinook salmon are considered adults for this report.
    [Show full text]
  • DOE/EIS-0340-SA-01: Supplement Analysis for NEOH Grande Ronde
    DOE F 1325.8e Electronic Form Approved by CILR – 10/08/2002 (08-89) United States Government Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration memorandum DATE: March 23, 2006 REPLY TO ATTN OF: KEC-4 SUBJECT: Supplement Analysis for NEOH Grande Ronde - Imnaha Spring Chinook Hatchery Project (DOE/EIS-0340-SA-01) TO: Ken Kirkman - KEWU-4 Project Manager Proposed Action: Grande Ronde - Imnaha Spring Chinook Hatchery Project Modifications Resulting from Final Design Project No.: 1988-053-01 Location: Wallowa County, Oregon Proposed By: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and Nez Perce Tribe Introduction: BPA, in its March 11, 2005 Record of Decision (ROD) on the Grande Ronde - Imnaha Spring Chinook Hatchery Project, decided to fund value engineering, land acquisition and final design of fish production facilities to support an ongoing program of Snake River spring chinook propagation for conservation and recovery of the species. BPA analyzed the environmental impacts of the program in the NEOH Grande Ronde - Imnaha Spring Chinook Hatchery Project (DOE/EIS-0340) completed in July 2004. Subsequently, modifications to some of the proposed facilities and sites have been made to reduce costs, improve efficiency, reduce hazards and risks, and ameliorate some physical limitations and lingering public issues associated with some aspects of certain facilities. These changes are detailed in the attached report entitled “Supplement Analysis for the NEOH Grande Ronde - Imnaha Spring Chinook Hatchery Project Final Environmental Impact Statement.” The purpose of the Supplement Analysis (SA) is to determine if a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is needed to analyze and disclose the environmental impacts of the proposed changes in project design since the Final EIS and ROD were issued.
    [Show full text]
  • Wallowa River, Oregon
    Hydropower Project License Summary WALLOWA RIVER, OREGON WALLOWA FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-308) Photo Credit: Pacific Power This summary was produced by the Hydropower Reform Coalition Wallowa River, Oregon Wallowa River, OR WALLOWA FALLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT (P-308) DESCRIPTION: The Wallowa Falls Project is located approximately 6 miles south of Joseph, Oregon in Wallowa County on the East Fork Wallowa River and on Royal Purple Creek, a tributary of the Wallowa River. The project is operated by PacifiCorp Energy (PacifiCorp), and occupies 12 acres of federal land within the Wallowa- Whitman National Forest administered by the U.S. Forest Service. The project has an authorized capacity of 1.1 megawatts (MW). A popular summer camping and hiking destination, the project’s affected rivers are also home federally listed Bull Trout. As such, the updated license contains many provisions to ensure that the species is protected from the dam’s continuing operations. These updated requirements are addressed in the pages that follow. A. SUMMARY 1. License Application Filed: February 28, 2014 2. License Issued: January 5, 2017 3. License Expiration: 12/31/2056 4. Capacity: 1.1 MW 5. Waterway: East Fork Wallowa River, West Fork Wallowa River, & Royal Purple Creek 6. Counties: Wallowa County 7. Licensee: PacifiCorp Energy 8. Licensee Contact: PacifiCorp Energy 825 NE Multnomah Street Portland, OR 97232 9. Project Website: http://www.pacificorp.com/es/hydro/hl/wf.html 10. Project Area: The project is located in the Wallowa Mountain Range and affects three waterways: the East Fork Wallowa River (East Fork), Royal Purple Creek, and the West Fork Wallowa River (West Fork).
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Q2
    QUARTERLY impactREPORT Q2 2019 HELLO FRIEND, The Freshwater Trust (TFT) protects and restores rivers all year round, but the next few months are our busiest season. It’s all helicopters, plants and restoration professionals on deck. Due to permitting and weather, we have a narrow window when we can install large wood structures for fish habitat and river complexity in places like the Sandy River basin.In a matter of weeks, helicopters will carry massive logs to key You’ll also hear about our fifth water quality places along a river or creek – places that have trading program to benefit the McKenzie River, been carefully identified by our project staff this won this past quarter. past quarter. These large wood structures will improve the overall river function, create new These reports are intended to shine a spotlight side channels, and increase the complexity of the on what we’ve accomplished with your support habitat for native fish species. Much of this work and provide you with a sneak peak of where we’re is paid for through grants and contracts. But going. Our past successes and future wins are another big piece comes from the dollars you’ve both thanks to you. helped raise already this year. The next couple months is also the season when Thank you for your continued our water deals shine – when the contracts we’ve signed with farmers and ranchers kick into action support of this organization. and save thousands of gallons of water in rivers that need it – when the temperatures are high and the fish need all the cool water they can get.
    [Show full text]
  • Wallowa Coordinates: 45.571936,-117.52125
    Application Name: Tamkaliks Side Channel and Wetland Complex By: Nez Perce Tribe Offering Type: Open Solicitation Application Type: Restoration OWEB Region: Eastern Oregon County: Wallowa Coordinates: 45.571936,-117.52125 Applicant: Kathryn Frenyea PO Box 909 Joseph OR 97846-0909 541.432.2506 [email protected] Payee: Arleen Henry PO Box 365 Lapwai ID 83540 208.843.7317 [email protected] Project Manager: Montana Pagano PO Box 909 Joseph Or 97846 (541) 432-2507 [email protected] Budget Summary: OWEB Amount Requested: $0 Total Project Amount: $0 Page 1 of 26 Printed by OWEB Grant Management System (OGMS) on 10/15/2018 2:15:36 PM Online Application for Tamkaliks Side Channel and Wetland Complex --In-progress-- , By Nez Perce Tribe Administrative Information Abstract Provide an abstract statement for the project. Include the following information: 1) Identify the project location; 2) Briefly state the project need; 3) Describe the proposed work; 4) Identify project partners. The proposed project site is located adjacent to the Wallowa River, in the town of Wallowa, and is part of a 320 acre parcel belonging to the Wallowa Band Nez Perce Trail Interpretive Center, Inc. (the Homeland Project). The local non-profit organization, chartered in 1995, is supported regionally by private citizens, local government, and representatives from the Nez Perce Tribe, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation and Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation. This land provides a place for Nez Perce people ranging from Washington, Oregon and Idaho, to exercise traditional cultural practices – such as the annual Tamkaliks Celebration – in their historical homeland territory.
    [Show full text]
  • West Fork Wallowa River Trail #1820
    FOREST TRAILS SERVICE 2 to 3 day trip Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Wallowa Mountains Visitor Center Eagle Cap Wilderness 201 East 2nd Street P.O. Box 905 Joseph, OR 97846 (541) 426-5546 www.fs.usda.gov/wallowa-whitman WEST FORK WALLOWA RIVER TRAIL #1820 TRAIL BEGINNING: West Fork Wallowa River Trailhead (Wallowa Lake) TRAIL ENDING: Hawkins Pass ACCESS: From Enterprise, Oregon, take State Highway #82 through Joseph and past Wallowa Lake. The trailhead is at the end of the road approximately one mile past the lake. Parking is available at the trailhead along with a loading ramp and hitch rails for stock. ATTRACTIONS: The trail follows the west fork of the Wallowa River through open meadows and forests. The trail is a gradual climb to Six Mile Meadow, then becomes steeper up to Hawkins Pass. Many wildflowers can be seen along the trail such as mountain bluebells, forget-me-nots, paintbrush and columbine. There are fishing opportunities near Six Mile Meadows where the river flows a little slower. Keep your eyes open for indications of past landslides and avalanches. Frazier Lake and Little Frazier Lake are at the end of this hike, where you will have spectacular views of limestone cliffs and a waterfall cascading down the cliffs. CONSIDERATIONS: Northwest Forest Passes are NOT required at Wallowa Lake Trailhead. The trail is well maintained for hikers and stock. It is signed at the trailhead and at all main junctions. This trail provides access to many other trails, and to the Lakes Basin. There are no campsites at the trailhead.
    [Show full text]
  • Recreation Overview
    APPENDIX 8-1 RECREATION OVERVIEW SUMMARY: Recreation and tourism are increasingly important parts of Wallowa County’s economy. Overall tourism and recreation spending has doubled over the last ten years, with an increased emphasis on conventional tourism (As opposed to more traditional recreation such as hunting, fishing and backcountry trips, conventional tourism is more centered on nice lodging, fine dining, shopping and sight seeing). People come to Wallowa County for scenery, solitude, camping, picnicking, boating, snow and water skiing, snowmobiling, auto touring, hiking and backpacking, horseback riding, fishing, hunting, and to visit the shops, galleries and restaurants in the Joseph and the Wallowa Lake area.. Recreation is centered around Wallowa Lake and the Eagle Cap Wilderness and to a lesser extent the streams and rivers of the County including the Snake River and the Hells Canyon National Recreation Area. Tourism is centered around Joseph and the Wallowa Lake area. PAST AND PRESENT: Recreation and tourism are considered a primary part of the County’s economy , and are the fastest growing segment of the economy. Wallowa Lake and Joseph are the center of tourism in the County and the State Park at Wallowa Lake is a major attraction. The Joseph Economic Improvement District and resultant improvements has turned Joseph into a center for tourism, and has led to a doubling of businesses on main street. This industry is highly seasonal and operates from late May to mid October, with peak activity from the first of July to mid October. The tourist facilities at the lake, including the State Park parking area, the moorage and docks, short term rentals, the motels, and the restaurants, now stand idle during the winter months.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidate Conservation Agreement
    CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT FOR Lomatium greenmanii Greenman’s Desert Parsley U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Eagle Cap Ranger District U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, La Grande Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office September 2007 ii CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT FOR Lomatium greenmanii Greenman’s Desert Parsley __/s/ Mary C. DeAguero____________________________________________________9/15/07________ Mary DeAguero Date District Ranger HCNRA/Eagle Cap District, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest _/s/ Steven A. Ellis _______________________________________________________ 9/18/07______ Steven A. Ellis Date Forest Supervisor Wallowa-Whitman National Forest __/s/ Gary S. Miller ________________________________________________________9/20/07___ Gary S. Miller, Field Supervisor Date U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service La Grande Field Office _/s/ Kemper M. McMaster __________________________________________________9/25/07_______ Kemper McMaster, State Supervisor Date U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office iii iv Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................1 I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 II. SPECIES INVOLVED ........................................................................................... 2 Lomatium greenmanii (Greenman’s desert parsley) ..................................................
    [Show full text]