DOCSLIB.ORG

Improving Maternal Health Access, Coverage, and Outcomes in Medicaid

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Improving Maternal Health Access, Coverage, and Outcomes in Medicaid Improving Maternal Health Access, Coverage, and Outcomes in Medicaid A Resource for State Medicaid Agencies and Medicaid Managed Care Organizations Preface Shortly after this project was completed, the first cases of COVID-19 in the United States were reported. As we go to press, the pandemic is bringing to the forefront the very issues this project was designed to address; never could we have anticipated such a need for attention to maternal health policy in Medicaid, particularly midwifery-led care at freestanding birth centers. COVID-19 is laying bare existing health inequities, the consequences of lack of health insurance coverage, as well as the limited capacity of existing birth centers, regulatory barriers and restrictive requirements for midwives. This moment presents an opportunity to address these inequities and barriers and fully incorporate the midwifery-led model of care into the Medicaid program. Acknowledgments We are grateful for the community of voices who have guided this project and the expertise, wisdom, and support of the many contributors and reviewers of this report and accompanying resources. The Institute for Medicaid Innovation also thanks the members of the national technical expert panel who helped to guide this project from its inception. Members of the panel challenged us to think beyond the obvious and volunteered their expertise in reviewing draft reports. In addition, we thank the organizations and individuals who responded to the national request for information to identify exemplars in the maternal model of care for Medicaid and who participated in extensive phone and in-person interviews. They included Birth Detroit, Boston Medical Center, Buffalo Prenatal-Perinatal Network, Community of Hope, Dasher Inc., El Rio Birth Center, HealthConnect One, HealthNet Community Doula Program, Mamatoto Village, Mountain Area Health Education Center, Penn Center for Community Health Workers, Roots Community Birth Center, San Francisco Support Sisters, and Uzazi Village. Their dedication to improving maternal and child health outcomes in the Medicaid population has resulted in the development of innovative programs and critical lessons learned that have the potential to assist other Medicaid stakeholders. Technical Expert Panel Members Expert Contributors Brenda Blasingame Zsakeba Henderson, MD Former Executive Director Medical Epidemiologist HealthConnect One National Network of Perinatal Quality Collaboratives Centers for Disease Control Carolyn J. Brooks, ScD, MA Maternal Child Health Program Director Vanessa Lee, MPH UnitedHealthcare Community and State Infant Mortality Collaborative Improvement & Innovation Networks Coordinator and Public Health Analyst Steven Calvin, MD Division of Healthy Start and Perinatal Services Maternal Founder and Medical Director and Child Health Bureau Minnesota Birth Center and the Birth Bundle Health Resources and Services Administration Amy Chen, JD Kacie McLaughlin, MPH Senior Attorney Public Health Analyst National Health Law Program Maternal and Child Health Bureau Health Resources and Services Administration Eugene Declerq, PhD Professor of Community Health Sciences Kimberly Sherman, MPH, MPP Boston University Division of Healthy Start and Perinatal Services Maternal and Child Health Bureau Blair Dudley, MPH Health Resources and Services Administration Senior Manager Transform Maternity Care Pacific Business Group on Health Authors Jordana Frost, DrPH, MPH, CPH, CD(DONA) Jennifer E. Moore, PhD, RN, FAAN Director, Maternal Child Health and Government Affairs Founding Executive Director March of Dimes Primary Investigator Institute for Medicaid Innovation Lisa Kane Low, PhD, CNM, FACNM, FAAN Associate Professor of Nursing and Women’s Studies Karen E. George, MD, MPH, FACOG University of Michigan Senior Women’s Health Fellow Project Director Jere McKinley Institute for Medicaid Innovation Acting Executive Director HealthConnect One Chloe Bakst Health Policy & Research Assistant Pooja Mittal, DO Project Manager Family Physician and Medical Director Institute for Medicaid Innovation HealthNet Karen Shea, MSN, RN Aza Nedhari, CPM, DHSc, MFT Senior Healthcare Management Consultant Founding Executive Director Institute for Medicaid Innovation Mamatoto Village This report was produced with support from the Yellow Chair Foundation. Amy Romano, MBA, MSN, CNM Copyright 2020 Improving Access, Coverage, and Outcomes in Medicaid: A Guide Independent Consultant for State Medicaid Agencies and Medicaid Managed Care Organizations Statement on Gender The Institute for Medicaid Innovation (IMI) recognizes that there are The document uses the pronouns “they/them/theirs” whenever possible individuals who become pregnant and give birth who might not identify in recognition of the gender-diverse population who may be included as women. Individuals who identify as women might also depend on a in maternal care. IMI has attempted to create a resource that is gender- diverse set of health care needs. The following report frequently uses the neutral, limiting gendered language and only using such terms when words “woman,” “women,” and “maternal.” This includes transgender, necessary to conform with language specified in Medicaid requirements, gender non-conforming, and non-binary individuals who might need the statutes/policy language, and cited research and data. IMI hopes to create suite of care services related to pregnancy, birth, and postpartum care. a resource that is inclusive of all individuals in the Medicaid community Also, “maternal care” in this document includes all individuals who require and their diverse health care needs. such services. Table of Contents Executive Summary 7 Coverage of Pregnancy Service in Medicaid 11 Disparities Among Maternal Health Outcomes Challenges in Accessing Pregnancy Services in Medicaid Eligibility and Coverage Gaps Unmet Social Needs Implicit Bias and Racism What is the Midwifery-Led Model of Care? 19 What is the Evidence on the Midwifery-Led Model of Care? Practice Settings 25 Hospital Births Case Study: BMC Birth Center Freestanding Birth Centers Freestanding Birth Center Outcomes in Medicaid Case Study: Birth Detroit Licensure & Scope of Practice 32 Medicaid Billing & Reimbursement 35 Billing and Service Codes Incident to Billing Establishing Reimbursement Rates for Midwifery-Led Care The Influence of Medical Loss Ratios on Reimbursement Equitable Compensation Medicaid Contract Considerations 41 Contracting with Freestanding Birth Centers Contracting Challenges with Freestanding Birth Centers Case Study: Baby and Company Alternative Payment Models 46 Bundled Payment Arrangements Federally Qualified Health Centers Case Study: Community of Hope Birth Center Monitoring & Evaluation 50 Challenges in Quality Measurement Measurement Development & Reporting Developing the Business Case 56 What is a Reasonable ROI? Business Case Scenarios to Consider Essential Elements for a Maternal Health Initiative Business Case 63 Opportunities Engagement in the State Medicaid RFP and Procurement Process Clinical, Research, and Policy Opportunities 70 Appendices Glossary Overview of CNM, CM, and CPM Education Credentialing, and Licensure State Regulations of Midwifery Practice & Medicaid Reimbursement 163 References Executive Summary U nder-utilization of high-value, evidence-based care, such as the midwifery-led model of care, and over-utilization of unnecessary care, such as cesarean deliveries without indication, are gaining attention in the U.S. as the nation attempts to address growing concerns about maternal health. These concerns include rising rates of maternal mortality and morbidity, increased costs of care, poor or even traumatic patient experiences, workforce shortages, and decreases in access to care in some regions of the country. The alarming trends of racial/ethnic, geographic, and socioeconomic disparities are necessitating local, state, and national conversations. These concerns are compounded by increased awareness of the role that unmet social needs, implicit bias, and structural racism have on maternal and infant outcomes. The factors contributing to poor maternal and infant outcomes in the U.S. are extensive and complex. There will not be only one intervention that will address all of these factors. As the nation considers the combination of potential interventions, it is important to fully consider opportunities to implement a high-value, evidence-based maternal model of care such as the midwifery-led model, both in hospitals and in freestanding birth centers. Midwifery-led care might be a means to improve health equity and ultimately, maternal and infant outcomes for pregnant individuals enrolled in Medicaid. Midwife-led continuity of care has been defined as care where “the midwife is the lead professional in the planning, organization, and delivery of care given to a woman from initial booking to the postnatal period.”1 www.MedicaidInnovation.org 8 This report reflects the Institute for Medicaid Innovation’s ambitious national project to answer critical questions that are needed to advance maternal health, specific to the midwifery-led model of care, for the Medicaid population: What is the current evidence on the midwifery-led maternity model of care 1 and freestanding birth centers? Are there differences between Medicaid and commercially insured populations? What are the state variations in access and coverage for the Medicaid 2 population specific to midwifery services and freestanding birth centers? What are the policy barriers by
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Implementation Guide Improving the Quality of Facility-Based Delivery for Mothers and Newborns
    BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Implementation Guide Improving the quality of facility-based delivery for mothers and newborns WHO SAFE CHILDBIRTH CHECKLIST IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE 1 WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data WHO safe childbirth checklist implementation guide: improving the quality of facility-based delivery for mothers and newborns. 1.Parturition. 2.Birthing Centers. 3.Perinatal Care. 4.Maternal Health Services. 5.Infant, Newborn. 6.Quality of Health Care. 7.Checklist. I.World Health Organization. ISBN 978 92 4 154945 5 (NLM classification: WQ 300) © World Health Organization 2015 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO web site (www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications—whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution—should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO website (www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organiza- tion concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety of Immunization During Pregnancy a Review of the Evidence
    Safety of Immunization during Pregnancy A review of the evidence Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety © World Health Organization 2014 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO website (www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications –whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution– should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO website (www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.2016 SOGH Newsletter Exerpt
    NEWSLETTER February 2016 Edition SOGH is dedicated to enhancing the safety and quality of OB/GYN Hospital Medicine by promoting excellence through education, coordination of hospital teams, and collaboration with healthcare delivery systems. Newsletter articles and content © Society of OB/GYN Hospitalists www.societyofobgynhospitalists.org 11200 Broadway, Suite 2743 Pearland, TX 77584 E-mail: [email protected] Twitter & Instagram: @SOGHofficial SOGH Newsletter 2.2016 Practice Matters by REBECCA DUNSMOOR- SU, MD MSCE FACOG January 28, 2016 After many years in a traditional university based academic practice I transitioned to a full time obstetric hospitalist practice in 2012. I am employed by Obstetrix Medical Group as part of a larger organization that includes perinatologists, obstetric hospitalists, and advanced registered nurse practitioners. Our hospital, Swedish Medical Center (SMC), First Hill Campus, in Seattle, WA does over 7000 deliveries a year. A large proportion of these patients are cared for by community based family practitioners. Seattle is a large urban center with extensive tertiary medical services. It serves as a referral center for a large 5 state region (including Washington, Alaska, Wyoming, Idaho and Montana). In these outlying rural areas, a high proportion of the obstetric care is provided by family medicine physicians. Seattle also has a very active Certified Nurse Midwife community who provide obstetric care in free standing birthing centers and attend home births. SMC is a community teaching hospital with medical students, family practice residents, a rotating ob-gyn resident, and family practice fellows. Interestingly, SMC offers a one year family medicine fellowship program to interested family medicine physicians in cesarean delivery and more intensive obstetrics.
    [Show full text]
  • Out of Institution Birth Packet
    Out of Institution Birth Packet Revised 6/2021 511-1-3-05. Registration of Out of Institution Births 1. In any case where a birth occurs outside a hospital, or other recognized medical facility, without medical attendance and the birth certificate is filed by someone other than a health care provider, additional evidence in support of the facts of birth shall be completed and filed in the presence of the local Vital Records registrar in the county where the birth occurred. A birth certificate for a birth which occurs outside a recognized medical institution shall only be filed upon personal presentation of the following evidence by the individual(s) filing the certificate: (a) Proof of pregnancy: 1. Prenatal records; or 2. Statement from a physician or other licensed health care provider who is qualified to determine pregnancy; or 3. Prenatal blood analysis or positive pregnancy test results from a laboratory. (b) Proof of the mother’s residence on the date of the out of institution birth: 1. A valid driver’s license, or a state-issued identification card, which includes the mother’s current residence on the face of the license or card; or 2. A rent receipt which includes the mother’s name and address, and the name, address, and signature of the mother’s landlord. 3. A utility bill (e.g. electric bill, phone bill, or water bill) showing the address at child’s birth. (c) A copy of a bank statement showing the address at child’s birth. 2. An identifying document, with photograph, for the individual(s) personally presenting the evidence required to file the certificate.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiv Prevention in Maternal Health Services Programming Guide
    PREVENTING HIV,PROMOTING REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH HIV PREVENTION IN MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES PROGRAMMING GUIDE HIV Prevention in Maternal Health Services: Programming Guide © 2004 UNFPA and EngenderHealth. All rights reserved. United Nations Population Fund 220 East 42nd Street New York, NY 10017 U.S.A. www.unfpa.org EngenderHealth 440 Ninth Avenue New York, NY 10001 U.S.A. Telephone: 212-561-8000 Fax: 212-561-8067 e-mail: [email protected] www.engenderhealth.org This publication was made possible through financial support provided by UNFPA. Design: Deb Lake Typesetting: ConsolidatedGraphics Cover design: Cassandra Cook Cover photo credits: Liz Gilbert, on behalf of the David and Lucile Packard Foundation Printing: Automated Graphics Systems, Inc. ISBN 0-89714-694-8 Printed in the United States of America. Printed on recycled paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication data are available from the publisher. CONTENTS Acknowledgements v • Making Services Friendlier for Stigmatised Populations 55 Introduction 1 • Universal Precautions 57 • Why Was This Guide Developed? 3 • Safer Delivery Practises 58 • What Is Covered in This Guide? 5 • Staff Training 59 • How Was This Guide Developed? 6 • Facilitative Supervision 61 • Who Is This Guide For? 7 • Programme Resources 62 • How Can This Guide Be Used? 8 • How Is This Guide Organised? 8 Chapter 3: Training Topics 67 Chapter 1: Programme Planning 11 • Basic HIV and STI Orientation 69 • Planning Process 13 • Group Education Strategies 70 • Step 1: Needs Assessment 14 • Core Counselling
    [Show full text]
  • Iutzi, Masters Thesis 1 EVALUATION of A
    EVALUATION OF A TRADITIONAL BIRTH ATTENDANT AND COMMUNITY HEALTH LEADER TRAINING AND MENTORING PROGRAM: MATAGALPA, NICARAGUA Cassie J. Iutzi A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Public Health University of Washington June 2013 Committee: Wendy Johnson Christopher Dodd Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Global Health Iutzi, Masters Thesis 1 Abstract Evidence strongly shows that the risk of childbirth is best mitigated through giving birth at or near a health institution with emergency obstetrical services and receiving regular prenatal visits. These interventions have been shown to improve maternal morbidity and mortality. Many under-resourced areas of the world continue to have difficulty connecting poor rural women to these services. In Matagalpa, Nicaragua a pioneering project, “Destrezas para Salvar Vidas,” was implemented in August 2011 to provide training and mentorship to the traditional birth attendants and community health leaders to connect pregnant women in rural communities with the formal health sector. This project was evaluated at the one-year point through tests of knowledge both before and after an initial one-week training, records of activities conducted by participants, and interviews with program participants and mentors. The aggregate test scores of participants’ knowledge during the initial week of training increased from an average score of 59.5% to 79.9% (differences 21.4%, p<0.001). Of the pregnant women in contact with program participants, 93% delivered at an institution, compared to 81% of all pregnant women in Matagalpa. Participants performed an average of 51 home visits each over the year. Reciprocal trust and communication increased between community participants and health sector workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Maternal Health Outcomes in Dc
    MATERNAL HEALTH OUTCOMES IN DC: Why are Black Women Dying from Pregnancy- Professor Jocelyn Johnston American University PUAD 610.003 | April 26th, 2020 Related Complications in Wards 7 & 8? Nancy Erickson, Matthew Hufford, & Isabel Taylor OUR MOTIVATION CAUSES • The US ranks 60th in maternal mortality rate out of 187 ranked Policy nations, placing well behind other developed nations1. Unlike • In DC, Medicaid only pays for health services up to ing, affordable childcare, and job opportunities. other countries, the American mortality rate has increased over 60 days postpartum and 1-2 visits. the past 10 years2 even though 3 in 5 pregnancy-related deaths in • In DC, inequitable resource distribution, limited Race and History the USA are preventable3. number of health systems funded, and delayed • Many black women do not trust medical institu- • The DC maternal mortality rate is still almost 2 times the national passing of key legislation.10 tions due to a long history of mistreatment toward rate4 despite dramatic improvements since 2014.5 Within DC, African-Americans. Wards 7 and 8 experience the highest rates of women delaying Socioeconomics • Black women frequently experience disrespect, proce- prenatal care, smoking during pregnancy, preterm births, low • Nearly 97% of DC residents “It’s hard to repair birth weights, and infant mortality.6 have health insurance11; free dures without consent, rough preventative healthcare services 100 years of harmful handling, and dismissiveness Percentage of D.C. Women Who Initiated Prenatal Care by decisions with 5 years toward pain from doctors. 25 are underutilized. Ward and Trimester, 2015-2016 • There is insufficient research of positive ones.” Various studies have indicated into social determinants of ac- implicit racial bias among 100% - Kristina Wint, AMCHP 17 cessing preventative care in DC.
    [Show full text]
  • Tackling Maternal Health Disparities: a Look at Four Local Organizations with Innovative Approaches
    Tackling Maternal Health Disparities: A Look at Four Local Organizations with Innovative Approaches Maternal health disparities have many causes, but disparate social conditions and a lack of prenatal care or substandard maternal care are often key factors. Community-based maternal care models can help to narrow the disparities in maternal health outcomes by providing expanded prenatal, childbirth and postpartum support that is respectful and culturally relevant to at-risk women. These models may also focus on breastfeeding and parental development. This issue brief highlights four programs from across the country, examines the importance of community-based maternal care models and offers recommendations for supporting and expanding them. Maternal Health Disparities The United States has some of the worst rates of maternal and infant health outcomes among high-income nations, despite spending an estimated $111 billion per year on maternal, prenatal and newborn care.1 For example, Black, American Indian and Alaska Native2 women are more likely to experience complications during pregnancy and are nearly four times more likely to die from pregnancy or childbirth than white women.3 Latina, Asian and Pacific Islander women generally have birth outcomes that are similar to those of white women, but some reports show that certain subgroups fare worse than white women.4 National Partnership for Women & Families Tackling Maternal Health Disparities 1 Many of the poor maternal health outcomes that women of color experience are due to systemic barriers that create METHODOLOGY unequal social conditions. Compared to white women, women The National Partnership for Women of color are: & Families research team visited }}More likely to experience discrimination, which can increase Mamatoto Village in Washington, cortisol levels with adverse effects on maternal and infant DC and conducted the interview in person; the other three interviews took health.5 Racism can have negative consequences on the birth place as conference calls.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations for Maternal Health and Infant Health Quality Improvement in Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Prog
    Anchor Recommendations for Maternal Health and Infant Health Quality Improvement in Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program December 18, 2020 JudyAnn Bigby, Jodi Anthony, Ruth Hsu, Chrissy Fiorentini, and Margo Rosenbach Submitted to: Division of Quality & Health Outcomes Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 7500 Security Blvd. Baltimore, MD 21244 Contracting Officer Representative: Deirdra Stockmann, Ph.D. Contract Number: HHSM-500-2014-00034I/75FCMC18F0002 Submitted by: Mathematica 955 Massachusetts Avenue Suite 801 Cambridge, MA 02139 Telephone: (617) 491-7900 Facsimile: (617) 491-8044 Project Director: Margo L. Rosenbach, Ph.D. Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Poor outcomes and disparities call for urgent actions to improve maternal and infant health ............. 1 The role for Medicaid and CHIP to improve maternal and infant health .............................................. 2 Opportunities to Improve Maternal and Infant Health .................................................................................. 4 Maternal health ................................................................................................................................... 4 Infant health ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Recommendations .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pregnancy Intention and Utilization of Maternal And
    Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi, 9(1), 2018: 27-36 DOI: 10.22435/kespro.v9i1.891.27-36 PREGNANCY INTENTION AND UTILIZATION OF MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CARE SERVICES IN INDONESIA Ika Saptarini1,2,*, Diahhadi Setyonaluri1 1Faculty of Economic and Business, University of Indonesia 2National Institute of Health Research and Development, Ministry of Health, Indonesia Submitted 31 May 2018; reviewed 3 June 2018; approved 30 June 2018 Abstrak Latar belakang: Antenatal care, persalinan oleh tenaga kesehatan, postnatal care serta imunisasi lengkap membantu meningkatkan kesehatan ibu dan anak. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara perencanaan kehamilan dan pemanfaatan pelayanan kesehatan ibu dan anak. Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan data dari Survei Kesehatan Demografi Indonesia 2012. Empat model regresi digunakan untuk mengidentifikasi hubungan antara perencanaan kehamilan dan pemanfaatan pelayanan kesehatan ibu dan anak. Hasil: Lebih dari seperlima (25,5%) responden menerima kelima jenis perawatan ibu dan anak. Lima belas persen wanita melaporkan bahwa kehamilan terakhir mereka tidak diinginkan. Perencanaan kehamilan berhubungan secara bermakna dengan penggunaan antenatal care yang memadai (OR: 0,53, 95% CI, 0,46-0,60), pemanfaatan antenatal care dan persalinan oleh tenaga kesehatan (OR: 0,62, 95% CI, 0,55-0,71), pemanfaatan antenatal care, persalinan oleh tenaga kesehatan dan postnatal care ( OR: 0,82, 95% CI, 0,72-0,93), namun tidak berhubungan secara signifikan dengan pemanfaatan antenatal care, persalinan oleh tenaga kesehatan, postnatal care hingga imunisasi lengkap (OR: 1,06, 95% CI, 0,91-1,22) setelah dikontrol menggunakan variabel sosiodemografi dan faktor obstetrik. Kesimpulan: Intervensi diperlukan untuk mengurangi kehamilan yang tidak diinginkan seperti meningkatkan akses ke layanan keluarga berencana.
    [Show full text]
  • ACI's 12Th National Forum on Residential Mortgage
    ACI’s 13th Annual Forum on Obstetric Malpractice Claims June 25-26, 2014 Minimizing Exposure to Obstetric Malpractice Litigation: Implementing Preventative Measures, Reducing Risk and Managing Adverse Outcomes John F. Rodis, MD Chair, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Medical Director, Women & Infants Health Services Executive Vice President/Chief Operating Officer St. Francis Hospital & Medical Center Professor of Obstetrics & Gynecology University of Connecticut School of Medicine Tweeting about this conference? #Obstetric Goals/Objectives . To identify and prevent the most common adverse pregnancy outcomes leading to long term harm and litigation. To learn how to mitigate the risks when obstetric emergencies occur through patient safety/risk reduction initiatives, including team training and drills. To learn what to do when, despite your best efforts, adverse events occur. #Obstetric Medical Error: Frame of Reference Source: Philadelphia Inquirer, 2008 #Obstetric The Facts . Obstetricians saw a four-fold increase in malpractice premiums from 1975-2000. Most ob/gyns pay annual premiums of over $80K. Premiums exceeding $100,000 are common. Obstetricians rank first among all specialties for the number of claims reported. Ob/Gyn has the highest percentage of claims closed with payment…35.3% Willis. Healthtrek: Healthcare Practice. September 2008 #Obstetric The Facts (continued) . 75% of ACOG members have been sued at least once1 . 65% of practitioners have made one or more changes to their practice out of fear of litigation2 . Ob/Gyns have an average of 2.6 claims filed against them during their careers (61% are obstetrics related)2 1 Tuhus, Melinda. Women’s News. www.womensenews.org 2 www.acog.org ACOG survey conducted in 2006 #Obstetric 6 Worse States for Med Malpractice .
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Staff
    medical staff March 2015 NEWSLETTER volume 53, issue 3 From the President Inside this issue: “The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.” From the President 1, 3 - George Bernard Shaw Summary of the Minutes 1-2 Outpatient Blood Transfusion 3 We are living in a new time of technologic advancement and Service is Moving change, commonly coined The Information Age. The dawn of the Information Age, also known as the Computer Age, New Board Members 4 Digital Age, or New Media Age is considered the period in human history where From the Health 5-6 our economy became based not on heavy industry or the making of things, but Science Library instead on the storage, retrieval, and sharing of data over an ever expanding global base. The premise that underlies this paradigm shift is that this inter- From Physician Informatics 6-7 connectivity and rapid access to information helps create a knowledge-based technology that has a world-wide sphere of influence on creating greater efficiency Celebrating Milestones 7 on production in both the service and manufacturing sectors. As our capacity to Save the Date 7 become interconnected continually increases, we find ourselves now communi- cating and executing data bits and information through ever more sophisticated From the Clinical 8 technological means. Yet, despite all this new found capability. I have noted that Documentation Specialists no one refers to this time as the “Communication Age.” Cerner Upgrade Training 8 Humans have a distinct need for communication. Indeed, humans in isolation Physicians Inspiring Donors: 9 don’t tend to fare well physically or mentally.
    [Show full text]