DOCSLIB.ORG

European Aquaculture Production Report 2007-2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Aquaculture Production Report 2007-2015 European Aquaculture Production Report 2007-2015 Prepared by the FEAP secretariat (October 2016) contact: FEAP Secretariat - [email protected] FEAP PRODUCTION REPORT - 2016 The Member Associations of the FEAP provide production data for the activities of their national producers on an annual basis. In addition, if available, forecasts for the coming year are also provided, based on their own individual reporting systems. The FEAP Secretariat groups this information into European and National reports on production for publication in this document. The information and figures used for the preparation of this report have been provided, for the most part, by the Member Associations of the FEAP while additional data has been sourced from National statistical offices and/or other national sources. For further statistical information on aquaculture production and values, the FAO provides a wide range of data for global aquaculture and fisheries statistics (FISHSTAT) while Globefish, another initiative of the FAO, represents a network of regional marketing information services that provides data on markets and prices. European trade data can be ac- cessed through EUMOFA – the European Market Observatory for Fisheries and Aquaculture Products (see www.eumofa.eu) and EUROSTAT. This FEAP Production report is split up in 3 sections, PRODUCTION BY REGION (pp. 2-6), BY COUNTRY (pp. 7-28) and BY SPECIES (pp. 30-45), covering the period 2007-2015: 1. Production by Region • Total European production (including EU and non EU countries) • EU Member State production (where available) • Non-EU European State production 2. Production by Country, covering Austria Iceland Croatia Ireland Cyprus Italy Czech Republic Netherlands Denmark Norway Faroe Islands Poland Finland Portugal France Spain Germany Sweden Greece Turkey Hungary United Kingdom • Countries with a total production <1000 tons have not been included • Figures in red indicate that updated data are not yet available and figures identical to previous year(s) have been included so as to provide estimates. Images courtesy of Canstock FEAP Production Report 2016 1 FISH FARMING PRODUCTION IN EUROPE PRODUCTION (tons) YEAR COUNTRY 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 NORWAY 842.521 904.623 967.235 1.018.201 1.093.300 1.325.550 1.270.150 1.370.090 1.382.800 TURKEY 136.573 149.589 155.802 164.197 187.136 210.824 231.672 232.152 234.000 UTD. KINGDOM 143.721 144.031 154.949 158.268 161.033 175.292 174.897 178.417 201.578 GREECE 130.872 148.509 138.513 122.590 111.217 116.073 125.580 115.200 112.159 FAROE ISLANDS 29.183 45.506 57.900 47.190 62.400 76.800 76.480 86.449 66.090 SPAIN 62.293 65.835 69.866 63.200 61.992 59.920 55.694 59.356 64.186 ITALY 63.815 64.073 65.137 64.382 64.781 58.100 57.590 57.990 55.480 FRANCE 49.491 47.110 45.954 44.342 45.980 44.540 40.205 41.641 44.595 DENMARK 40.068 39.831 38.216 37.904 38.548 33.447 39.176 38.829 38.829 POLAND 34.898 34.370 35.048 29.250 28.745 32.524 33.535 37.070 38.590 CZECH REPUBLIC 19.794 19.765 19.464 19.953 20.393 19.407 18.201 19.092 19.113 GERMANY 35.038 34.964 33.356 33.453 16.464 15.155 16.150 16.449 15.341 HUNGARY 14.942 15.860 13.976 13.524 15.297 14.433 14.251 14.378 16.124 FINLAND 11.000 12.000 12.700 10.400 9.220 9.000 9.954 12.448 12.500 IRELAND 13.060 12.020 14.500 13.934 13.434 13.434 12.450 11.400 12.000 SWEDEN 4.956 6.703 7.023 9.171 11.963 12.441 11.657 11.144 11.144 CROATIA 6.913 7.635 9.946 9.823 10.681 8.822 8.512 10.201 12.093 ICELAND 5.588 5.014 5.116 5.018 5.260 7.368 6.886 8.289 8.249 NETHERLANDS 9.640 9.340 7.095 6.560 6.110 5.560 6.155 6.155 6.155 PORTUGAL 4.274 4.024 4.097 4.674 5.130 7.000 3.635 5.760 5.919 CYPRUS 2.229 2.452 3.343 4.118 4.665 4.313 6.171 4.810 5.409 AUSTRIA 2.669 2.206 2.260 2.279 2.813 3.001 3.115 3.121 3.121 Grand Total 1.663.538 1.775.460 1.861.496 1.882.431 1.976.562 2.253.004 2.222.116 2.340.441 2.365.475 2 FEAP Production Report 2016 FISH FARMING PRODUCTION IN EUROPE 2,500,000 AUSTRIA CYPRUS PORTUGAL 2,000,000 ICELAND NETHERLANDS CROATIA SWEDEN FINLAND 1,500,000 IRELAND HUNGARY CZECH REPUBLIC GERMANY POLAND 1,000,000 DENMARK FRANCE ITALY FAROE ISLANDS 500,000 SPAIN GREECE UTD. KINGDOM TURKEY NORWAY 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 FEAP Production Report 2016 3 FISH FARMING PRODUCTION IN THE EU PRODUCTION (tons) YEAR COUNTRY 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 UTD. KINGDOM 143,704 144,015 154,933 158,252 161,033 175,292 174,897 178,417 201,578 GREECE 130,872 148,509 138,513 122,590 111,217 116,073 125,580 115,200 112,159 SPAIN 62,293 65,835 69,866 63,200 61,992 59,920 55,694 59,356 64,186 ITALY 63,792 64,054 65,120 64,365 64,781 58,100 57,590 57,990 55,480 FRANCE 49,491 47,110 45,954 44,342 45,980 44,540 40,205 41,641 44,595 DENMARK 40,115 39,886 38,322 38,009 38,653 33,552 39,281 38,934 38,829 POLAND 34,898 34,370 35,048 29,250 28,745 32,524 33,535 37,070 38,590 CZECH REPUBLIC 19,833 19,814 19,516 19,994 20,448 19,462 18,201 19,092 19,113 GERMANY 35,041 34,967 33,359 33,456 16,467 15,155 16,150 16,449 15,341 HUNGARY 14,974 15,892 14,016 13,562 15,343 14,477 14,251 14,378 16,124 FINLAND 11,000 12,000 12,700 10,400 9,220 9,000 9,954 12,448 12,500 IRELAND 13,060 12,020 14,500 13,934 13,434 13,434 12,450 11,400 12,000 SWEDEN 4,956 6,703 7,023 9,171 11,963 12,441 11,657 11,144 11,144 CROATIA 6,929 7,642 9,952 9,829 10,687 8,822 8,512 10,201 12,093 NETHERLANDS 8,740 8,440 7,110 6,570 6,150 5,620 6,305 6,305 6,305 PORTUGAL 4,274 4,024 4,097 4,674 5,130 7,000 3,635 5,760 5,919 CYPRUS 2,229 2,452 3,343 4,118 4,665 4,313 6,171 4,810 5,409 AUSTRIA 2,671 2,209 2,262 2,282 2,823 3,007 3,121 3,128 3,128 Grand Total 648,872 669,942 675,634 647,998 628,731 632,732 637,189 643,723 674,493 SOURCE: FEAP members & national statistics NOTE: Countries with a production less than 1000T are not included Malta is not included due to lack of availability of reliable data Tuna spp. and some minor freshwater pecies like (Northern) pike, (pike) perch, roach, tench are not included due to lack of reliable data 4 FEAP Production Report 2016 FISH FARMING PRODUCTION IN THE EU 800,000 700,000 AUSTRIA CYPRUS PORTUGAL 600,000 NETHERLANDS CROATIA SWEDEN 500,000 FINLAND IRELAND 400,000 HUNGARY CZECH REPUBLIC GERMANY 300,000 POLAND DENMARK FRANCE 200,000 ITALY SPAIN GREECE 100,000 UTD. KINGDOM 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 FEAP Production Report 2016 5 FISH FARMING PRODUCTION IN NON-EU EUROPE PRODUCTION (tons) YEAR COUNTRY 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 NORWAY 842,521 904,623 967,235 1,018,201 1,093,300 1,325,550 1,270,150 1,370,090 1,382,800 TURKEY 136,573 149,589 155,802 164,197 187,136 210,824 231,672 232,152 234,000 FAROE ISLANDS 29,183 45,506 57,900 47,190 62,400 76,800 76,480 86,449 66,090 ICELAND 5,588 5,014 5,116 5,018 5,260 7,368 6,886 8,289 8,249 Grand Total 1,013,865 1,104,732 1,186,053 1,234,606 1,348,096 1,620,542 1,585,188 1,696,980 1,691,139 2,000,000 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 ICELAND CZECH REPUBLIC 1,000,000 FAROE ISLANDS TURKEY 800,000 NORWAY 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 6 FEAP Production Report 2016 FISH FARMING PRODUCTION BY COUNTRY Members Associations in 2016 • Belgium • Croatia • Cyprus • Czech Republic • Denmark • Faroe Islands • Finland • France • Germany • Greece • Hungary • Iceland • Ireland • Italy • Netherlands • Norway • Poland • Portugal • Spain • Turkey • United Kingdom FEAP Production Report 2016 7 CROATIA PRODUCTION (tons) YEAR COUNTRY SPECIES 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 CROATIA Sea Bream 1,500 1,800 2,000 2,000 1,793 2,105 2,466 3,640 4,500 Sea Bass 2,500 2,700 3,000 3,200 2,785 2,375 3,014 3,500 4,500 Common Carp 1,503 1,546 2,058 1,816 2,891 2,484 2,100 2,100 2,100 Portion Rainbow Trout 800 800 2,000 2,095 2,358 1,232 350 361 400 Silver Carp 250 100 100 70 95 384 350 350 315 Grass carp 257 156 196 231 158 202 200 200 200 CROATIA Total 6,810 7,102 9,354 9,412 10,080 8,782 8,480 10,151 12,015 SOURCE: Croation chamber of Economy - Aquaculture unit NOTES: * from 2012 onwards figures for bighead carp included in the silver carp data * species with lower production than 100T are not included(perch, eel, catfish, meagre) 14,000 12,000 10,000 Grass carp 8,000 Silver Carp Portion Rainbow Trout 6,000 Sea Bream Sea Bass 4,000 Common Carp 2,000 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 CROATIA 8 FEAP Production Report 2016 CYPRUS PRODUCTION (tons) YEAR COUNTRY SPECIES 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 CYPRUS Sea Bream 1,404 1,600 2,572 2,799 3,065 3,121 4,444 2,919 3,656 Sea Bass 740 752 703 1,237 1,500 1,096 1,621 1,817 1,725 CYPRUS Total 2,144 2,352 3,275 4,036 4,565 4,217 6,065 4,736 5,381 SOURCE: Cyprus Mariculture Association 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 Sea Bass 3,000 Sea Bream 2,000 1,000 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 CYPRUS FEAP Production Report 2016 9 CZECH REPUBLIC PRODUCTION (tons) YEAR COUNTRY SPECIES 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 CZECH REPUBLIC Common Carp 17,947 17,507 17,258 17,746 18,198 17,972 16,809 17,833 17,860 Portion Rainbow Trout 623 614 526 476 580 388 439 426 368 Grass carp 342 394 409 488 412 456 384 337 445 Bighead carp 252 394 461 461 460 379 358 309 264 Tench 268 284 252 215 220 166 150 151 152 Silver Carp 405 586 601 583 546 162 150 133 113 European Wels Catfish 63 60 58 47 52 50 61 54 63 CZECH REPUBLIC Total 19,900 19,839 19,565 20,016 20,468 19,573 18,351 19,243 19,265 SOURCE: Czech Fish Farmers Association NOTE: Species with production <100T without reliable data sources are not mentioned ((pike)-perch,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020-2021 Regulations Book of Game, Fish, Furbearers, and Other Wildlife
    ALABAMA REGULATIONS 2020-2021 GAME, FISH, FURBEARERS, AND OTHER WILDLIFE REGULATIONS RELATING TO GAME, FISH, FURBEARERS AND OTHER WILDLIFE KAY IVEY Governor CHRISTOPHER M. BLANKENSHIP Commissioner EDWARD F. POOLOS Deputy Commissioner CHUCK SYKES Director FRED R. HARDERS Assistant Director The Department of Conservation and Natural Resources does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, age, sex, national origin, disability, pregnancy, genetic information or veteran status in its hiring or employment practices nor in admission to, access to, or operations of its programs, services or activities. This publication is available in alternative formats upon request. O.E.O. U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20204 TABLE OF CONTENTS Division of Wildlife and Freshwater Fisheries Personnel: • Administrative Office .......................................... 1 • Aquatic Education ................................................ 9 • Carbon Hill Fish Hatchery ................................... 8 • Eastaboga Fish Hatchery ...................................... 8 • Federal Game Agents ............................................ 6 • Fisheries Section ................................................... 7 • Fisheries Development ......................................... 9 • Hunter Education .................................................. 5 • Law Enforcement Section ..................................... 2 • Marion Fish Hatchery ........................................... 8 • Mussel Management ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • A. Update on the Implementation of Past Recommendations/Action Items
    U.S. Department of the Interior Oce of the Secretary C Street Washington, DC date: 11/30/2016 department poc: Hilary Smith email: [email protected] A. Update on the implementation of past recommendations/action items Spring 2015 – Recommendation: isac recommends that the nisc member agencies develop the early detection and rapid response framework and emergency funding plan called for in the Council on Climate Preparedness and Resilience and Natural Resources Working Group’s Priority Agenda: Enhancing the Climate Resilience of America’s Natural Resourc- es (October 2014); and, that they seek the involvement and advice of non-federal stakeholders, subject matter experts, tribal, state, and local government representatives who will be critical partners in the successful implementation of this framework and fund. In February, the Administration released the interdepartmental report, Safeguarding America’s Lands and Waters from Invasive Species: A National Framework for Early Detection and Rapid Response (https://www.doi.gov/ppa/reports-and-statistics). The nisc Management Plan, released in July, incorporates recommendations in the report as action items. This includes un- dertaking a series of scientific, technical, and institutional assessments to determine the capacities and resources necessary to establish a national edrr program. The nisc Secretariat is facilitating these assessments which are in progress. Additional action items within the nisc Management Plan related to the edrr Framework include: Establish Terms of Reference for and institute a National edrr Task Force within the nisc structure that will guide implementation of the edrr Framework; Produce an implementation plan for a nation-wide program for edrr; Assess investments, resource needs, and opportunities to leverage additional resources; Conduct cost-benefit analyses of edrr programs for potential invasive species; and Promote pilot projects across a variety of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Planer Boards on the Chesapeake
    Volume 24, Number 9 FREE April 2015 www.jayflemingphotography.com • AnnApolis updAte • the greAtest thing since sliced breAd! THIS ISSUE COMPLIMENTS OF FREE • big rAck burger • plAner boArds • WhAt is the super 25? • bustin’ bAss • the Monsters Are coMing April 2015 www.fishingandhuntingjournal.com 1 ALL FISHING! ALL THE TIME! Bay • Surf • Bass • Trout • Panfish SPECIAL ORDERS OUR SPECIALTY STRIPER TACKLE! Bay Trolling • Fly Fishing E-Mail Questions and Tackle Inquiries Freshwater Tackle Welcomed: [email protected] Lead Molds, All Sizes ROD & REEL REPAIRS & SERVICE Waders & Hip Boots for Over 200 Different Do-It & Cast Iron Molds in Stock ALL Sizes Over 600 Different Reels In Stock Complete Selection of Visit Our FLY FISHING TACKLE Distinctive Fly Rods • Reels • Tying Supplies & Equipment Fishing Room • How-To Books & Videos Since 1916... First Choice of Fishermen Around the World (410) 327-6942 Tuscorara found this Ground Hog mixed in with Snow Geese on 1919-25 Eastern Ave. Baltimore, MD. 21231 the first day of Spring. Rated by The National Check out Shooting Sports Foundation our video Pro Shop Mathews & Mission Bows • on line! Equipment Rentals Where the Hunt Never Ends! We welcome all types of events-Birthday, Bachelor & Bachelorette parties, Corporate Team Building Events! Crossbow Range featuring Now Open! Four Star Rated Range! Kevin Harris & Phil Warnick caught this 38 George E. Bennett, Owner- 3021 Churchville Road inch Northern Pike while ice fishing on Deep A+ Creek Lake on 2/8/15. (Rt. 22) • Churchville, MD 410-734-9554 Photo Courtesy of MD Anglers Log. www.deercreekarchery.com Colt Ask us about Taurus • Ruger HQL Classes! ON TARGET Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Fish of the Mekong the Mekong River © Daniel Cheong / Executive Summary WWF Greater Mekong Programme ©
    Riverof Giants Giant Fish of the Mekong The Mekong River © Daniel Cheong / www.flickr.com Executive Summary WWF Greater Mekong Programme © The worlds biggest freshwater fish and 4 out of the top ten As ambassadors of the Greater Mekong region, vulnerable to giant freshwater fish species can be found in the Mekong River fishing pressure and changes in the river environment, the which flows through Cambodia, China, Lao PDR, Myanmar, status of the giant fish is one indicator of the health and Thailand and Vietnam. More giants inhabit this mighty river ecological integrity of the Mekong. The well-being of these than any other on Earth. species is therefore closely linked to the sustainable management of the region and to limiting the environmental Little is known about these magnificent species of the Greater impacts of increased regional economic activity and Mekong region, some attaining five metres in length and over integration. half a ton in weight. What is known is that their future is uncertain. Any impact on the ecological balance of the river also threatens the sustainability of the aquatic resources that support Populations of the Mekong giant catfish have plummeted 90 millions of people. There are at least 50 migratory species per cent in just two decades, whilst the giant dog-eating catfish which are highly vulnerable to mainstream dam development. is seldom seen now in the wild. Living amongst the new These make up between 40-70 per cent of the catch of fish in emerging economic powers of Asia, a combination of the Mekong. infrastructure development, habitat destruction and overharvesting, is quickly eroding populations of these The 1995 agreement of the Mekong River Commission should extraordinary species.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Habitat Demands of Wels Catfish (Silurus Glanis) in a Swedish Lake - a Look Into Muddy Waters
    Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences Defining habitat demands of Wels catfish (Silurus glanis) in a Swedish lake - A look into muddy waters David Spange Department of Aquatic Resources Institute of Freshwater Research Master’s thesis • 30 hec Master Programme in Biology - Limnology Drottningholm 2018 Defining habitat demands of Wels catfish (Silurus glanis) in a Swedish lake - A look into muddy waters Definiering av den europeiska malens (Silurus glanis) habitatkrav i en svensk sjö. David Spange Supervisor: Henrik Jeuthe, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of aquatic resources Assistant supervisor: Joep De Leeuw, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of aquatic resources Examiner: Kerstin Holmgren, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of aquatic resources Credits: 30 hec Level: A2E Course title: Independent Project in Biology – Master’s thesis Course code: EX0565 Programme/education: Master Programme in Biology Limnology – Ecology and Environment of Inland Waters, 120 hec Place of publication: Drottningholm Year of publication: 2018 Cover picture: David spange Online publication: https://stud.epsilon.slu.se Keywords: Wels catfish, Silurus glanis, Sweden, Spawning, Spawning habitats, acoustic camera, ARIS, telemetry Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences Department of Aquatic Resources Abstract The wels catfish (Silurus glanis) is a rare species in Swedish waters, it demands higher water temperatures than most lakes and rivers can offer. One of the few locations with naturally occurring wels catfish in Sweden is Lake Båven, situated about an hour and a half south of Stockholm, in the county of Södermanland. Due to declines of the Swedish catfish populations, which are mostly a result of human impacts such as the destruction of spawning habitats, conservational actions are now needed in purpose to secure the future of the species in Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic List of the Romanian Vertebrate Fauna
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © Décembre Vol. LIII pp. 377–411 «Grigore Antipa» 2010 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-010-0028-1 SYSTEMATIC LIST OF THE ROMANIAN VERTEBRATE FAUNA DUMITRU MURARIU Abstract. Compiling different bibliographical sources, a total of 732 taxa of specific and subspecific order remained. It is about the six large vertebrate classes of Romanian fauna. The first class (Cyclostomata) is represented by only four species, and Pisces (here considered super-class) – by 184 taxa. The rest of 544 taxa belong to Tetrapoda super-class which includes the other four vertebrate classes: Amphibia (20 taxa); Reptilia (31); Aves (382) and Mammalia (110 taxa). Résumé. Cette contribution à la systématique des vertébrés de Roumanie s’adresse à tous ceux qui sont intéressés par la zoologie en général et par la classification de ce groupe en spécial. Elle représente le début d’une thème de confrontation des opinions des spécialistes du domaine, ayant pour but final d’offrir aux élèves, aux étudiants, aux professeurs de biologie ainsi qu’à tous ceux intéressés, une synthèse actualisée de la classification des vertébrés de Roumanie. En compilant différentes sources bibliographiques, on a retenu un total de plus de 732 taxons d’ordre spécifique et sous-spécifique. Il s’agît des six grandes classes de vertébrés. La première classe (Cyclostomata) est représentée dans la faune de Roumanie par quatre espèces, tandis que Pisces (considérée ici au niveau de surclasse) l’est par 184 taxons. Le reste de 544 taxons font partie d’une autre surclasse (Tetrapoda) qui réunit les autres quatre classes de vertébrés: Amphibia (20 taxons); Reptilia (31); Aves (382) et Mammalia (110 taxons).
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fishes and Lampreys of Greece
    HELLENIC CENTRE FOR MARINE RESEARCH Monographs on Marine Sciences No. 8 Freshwater Fishes and Lampreys of Greece An Annotated Checklist Barbieri R., Zogaris S., Kalogianni E., Stoumboudi M. Th, Chatzinikolaou Y., Giakoumi S., Kapakos Y., Kommatas D., Koutsikos N., Tachos, V., Vardakas L. & Economou A.N. 2015 Freshwater Fishes and Lampreys of Greece An Annotated Checklist HELLENIC CENTRE FOR MARINE RESEARCH Monographs on Marine Sciences No. 8 Freshwater Fishes and Lampreys of Greece An Annotated Checklist Barbieri R., Zogaris S., Kalogianni E., Stoumboudi M. Th, Chatzinikolaou Y., Giakoumi S., Kapakos Y., Kommatas D., Koutsikos N., Tachos, V., Vardakas L. & Economou A.N. 2015 Monographs on Marine Sciences 8 Authors: Barbieri R., Zogaris S., Kalogianni E., Stoumboudi M.Th., Chatzinikolaou Y., Giakoumi S., Kapakos Y., Kommatas D., Koutsikos N., Tachos V., Vardakas L. & Economou A.N. Fish drawings: R. Barbieri English text editing: S. Zogaris, E. Kalogianni, E. Green Design and production: Aris Vidalis Scientific reviewers: Jörg Freyhof, Dimitra Bobori Acknowledgements We would like to thank the following people for significant assistance in the field, for providing unpublished information, and/or support during the preparation of this work: Apostolos Apostolou, Nicolas Bailly, Bill Beaumont, Dimitra Bobori, Giorgos Catsadorakis, Charalambos Daoulas, Elias Dimitriou, Panayiotis Dimopoulos, Uwe Dussling, Panos S. Economidis, Jörg Freyhof, Zbigniew Kaczkowski, Nektarios Kalaitzakis, Stephanos Kavadas, Maurice Kottelat, Emmanuil Koutrakis, David Koutsogianopoulos, Marcello Kovačić, Ioannis Leonardos, Danilo Mrdak, Theodoros Naziridis, Elena Oikonomou, Kostas G. Papakonstatinou, Ioannis Paschos, Kostas Perdikaris, Olga Petriki, Radek Šanda, Nikolaos Skoulikidis, Manos Sperelakis, Kostas Tsigenopoulos, Maarten Vanhove, Haris Vavalidis, Jasna Vukić , Brian Zimmerman and the HCMR library staff (Anavissos Attiki).
    [Show full text]
  • Five Species of Sturgeons Under the Endangered Species Act
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/31/2013 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2013-25358, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code 3510-22-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 224 [Docket No. 120705210-3872-02] RIN 0648-XC101 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding and Proposed Endangered Listing of Five Species of Sturgeons under the Endangered Species Act AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Proposed rule; 12-month petition finding; request for comments. SUMMARY: We, NMFS, have completed comprehensive status reviews under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of five species of foreign sturgeons in response to a petition. We have determined, based on the best scientific and commercial data available and after taking into account efforts being made to protect the species, that Acipenser naccarii (Adriatic sturgeon), and A. sturio (European sturgeon) in Western Europe, A. sinensis (Chinese sturgeon) in the Yangtze River basin, and A. mikadoi (Sakhalin sturgeon) and Huso dauricus (Kaluga sturgeon) in the Amur River Basin/Sea of Japan/Sea of Okhotsk region, meet the definition of endangered species. We are not proposing to designate critical habitat because the geographical areas occupied by these species are entirely outside U.S. jurisdiction and we have not identified any unoccupied areas that are currently essential to the conservation of any of these species. We are soliciting information that may be relevant to these listing and critical habitat determinations, 1 especially on the status and conservation of these species.
    [Show full text]
  • NSW Pest Fish List As Part of a Consistent Approach to the Management of Ornamental Fish Throughout Australia
    Ornamental Fish Update – Important Information Regarding Pest Fish July 2017 On 16 December 2016, NSW government introduced further changes to the NSW Pest Fish List as part of a consistent approach to the management of ornamental fish throughout Australia. The NSW Pest Fish List now includes an additional 65 listings that have been nationally agreed as having a high-risk potential. ____________________________________________________________________________________ part 2, schedule 1 of the Biosecurity Regulation Why are there changes to the pest 2017, are subject to notification and must not be fish list? dealt with. Compliance with the NSW Pest Fish List is mandatory by law. In 2006, all Australian governments, in consultation with representatives of the ornamental fish industry, developed a National Strategy called the What should I do with any pest ‘A Strategic Approach to the Management of fish that I have? Ornamental Fish in Australia’. The National A number of ornamental fish species that were Strategy contains seven recommendations for the previously traded by the aquarium industry, management of ornamental fish in Australia, aquarium enthusiasts or hobbyists are now including the development of an agreed National prohibited from being sold and/or being in your Pest Fish List. possession. Pest fish possess characteristics that have the However, NSW DPI is providing a six month potential to trigger, or contribute to, aquatic pest or advisory period, which commenced on 1 March disease outbreaks, impacting upon natural 2017 to provide time for advisory materials to be biodiversity and fisheries resources. Weatherloach distributed and ornamental fish owners to comply and Tilapia are two examples of pest species with the new additions to the NSW pest fish list which, when released, are known to have impacts on our natural aquatic systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Environmental DNA for Sampling Fish – Is It the Future?
    Using environmental DNA for sampling fish – is it the future? Graeme Peirson 25th July 2018 What is eDNA? DNA that has been released by an organism into the environment in the form of mucus, skin, hair, faeces, urine, gametes etc. From live organisms and dead ones as they decompose eDNA degrades at varying rates according to the environment – may persist for 000’s years! Much shorter decay time in water – weeks only eDNA can be extracted from water without having to isolate the individual organism So why eDNA? Conventional capture methods: Labour-intensive Bulky equipment, costly to store & maintain Health & safety/biosecurity concerns Invasive / destructive (some methods) Limited effectiveness in some water types Hydroacoustics Information on size and abundance only, limited species ID Ineffective in many environments • Shallow, weedy, snaggy areas, marginal zones, benthic species The Process….. Water sampled & filtered (>3 x 15 ml -2L samples) Free-floating DNA (from sloughed skin cells faeces/urine, gametes, decaying matter) and microscopic taxa Next steps… Filtration and Non – specific PCR Extract DNA DNA extraction Blanks! Blanks! Primers: Riaz et al. 2011, Kocher et al. 1989 Metabarcoding and species-specific approaches eDNA targeted approches: • Targeted detection • Species-specific primers • Standard or qPCR • Traditional Sequencing = eDNA metabarcoding: • Screen whole community • (Several) conserved primers • PCR • Next generation sequencing = Sequencing and bioinformatics High Bioinformatics Final outputs Throughput Sequencing
    [Show full text]
  • A Set of Synopses of Works Which Are Planned to Report at the KINR Annual Conference-2020
    A set of Synopses of works which are planned to report at the KINR Annual conference-2020 PLASMA PHENOMENA CONNECTED WITH THE TRANSFER OF ENERGY AND MOMENTUM BY EIGENMODES A. V. Tykhyy Institute for Nuclear Research, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine The phenomenon of SC of energy and momentum is a factor that can affect plasma performance in toroidal devices. It is associated with energetic ions produced by NBI, ICRH, and fusion reactions; but it can occur also in a Maxwellian plasma, being caused by suprathermal ions with energies exceeding the thermal energy by a few times. The latter is true, at least, for stellarators where Alfvén eigenmodes can be destabilized by the ion temperature gradient due to non- axisymmetric resonances. In the steady state, the mode energy flux is directed from the unstable region to the region where damping dominates, i.e., either outwards or inwards. However, when the drive exceeds the damping, so that the mode amplitude grows, the picture of the mode fluxes is more complicated, and both outward and inward wave energy / momentum fluxes in different plasma regions during the same instability may occur. Since SC transfers energy and momentum, it may affect plasma energy confinement (deteriorating or improving it), plasma rotation and concomitant frequency Doppler shift, the heating of the electron and ion components, and features of the eigenmodes themselves. In general, SC plays a considerable role when, first, the region driving the instability is well separated from the damping region Sketch of spatial channeling and, second, the mode amplitudes are not very small.
    [Show full text]
  • New Data on the Subfossil Fauna from “Forum Serdica” (Sofia City, Bulgaria; 3Rd-19Th Century AD)
    Published online 29 December 2017 Historia naturalis bulgarica • ISSN 0205-3640 (print) | ISSN 2603-3186 (online) • http://www.nmnhs.com/historia-naturalis-bulgarica/ Historia naturalis bulgarica, 24: 179-186, 2017 New data on the subfossil fauna from “Forum Serdica” (Sofia City, Bulgaria; 3rd-19th century AD) Zlatozar Boev Abstract: Presented are the results of the excavations in the central Sofia circus of 3rd-4th to 16-19th c. AD from 2016, deposited over the Roman “Forum Serdica”. They number 8313 bone/shell finds of 47 taxa (at least 36 species and domestic forms) of invertebrates (mollusks – land snails and freshwater mussels) and vertebrate animals (bony ray-finned fishes, birds and mammals /incl. man/). One species, the Aurochs, is globally extinct and 1 disappeared from the recent fauna of Bulgaria (Great bustard). Seven species are listed in the country’s Red Data Book: European carp, Great bustard, Eurasian lynx, Gray wolf, Red deer, Brown bear, and Wildcat. Keywords: Medieval animal husbandry and hunting, Last Aurochs on the Balkans, Late-medieval poultry, Means of livelihood in the Ottoman period of Sofia Introduction AD (more often 17th-19th c. AD). When collected, the materials of a total of 37 collection samples were The continuation of the “Forum Serdica” pro- dated as “mixed”. The chronological distribution of ject (Archaeological excavations and exploration each species/sample is given in Table 1. The finds of “St Nedelya Circus”) revealed a lots of new ar- from the Ottoman period make up the vast majority chaeozoological materials in 2016. It remains un- (over 85%) of the material. All avian bone material examined and unpublished, as the previous study (562 findings) has been inventoried in the Fossil and of Boev (2016) covered the animal remains only of subfossil birds collection of the National Museum 2015.
    [Show full text]