Idaho Freight Network Key Contacts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Idaho Freight Network Key Contacts Transportation System Idaho Transportation Department Director Brian Ness, (208) 334-8807, [email protected] Idaho Freight Program – Mark Bathrick, (208)-334-8210, [email protected] Committees and Councils Idaho Transportation Department – Sue Higgins, Board Secretary (208) 334-8808, [email protected] Idaho Freight Advisory Committee (ITD) – Mark Bathrick, ITD Freight Coordinator, (208)-334- 8210, [email protected] Idaho Growers/Shippers Association – Mark Klompien, President, (208) 529-4400 Network Owners/Operators Highways Idaho Transportation Department Staff Idaho Transportation Department – Jim Carpenter, Chief Operating Officer, (208) 334-8811, [email protected] Ports of Entry – Pat Carr, (208) 334-4426, [email protected] Motor Carrier Services – Reymundo Rodriguez, (208) 334-8699, [email protected] Committees and Councils Idaho Trucking Council (ITD) – Beverlie Edwards, (208) 334-8609, [email protected] Idaho Trucking Association - Julie Pipal, President, (208) 342-3521, [email protected] Rail Class I Union Pacific – Sandy Lindstrom, 503.249.2717, [email protected] Burlington Northern (BNSF) – Colleen Weatherford, 206-625-6233, [email protected] Class II Montana Rail Link, Thomas Walsh, 406) 523-1500, [email protected] Idaho Freight Network Key Contacts Class III WATCO – John Brown, 208-734-4644 o Boise Valley Railroad, Gary Wagenseller, 208.442.0144, [email protected] o Eastern Idaho Railroad, Jack Lisle, 208.529.5828, [email protected] o Great Northwest, Bill Brown, 208-816-0730,[email protected] o Palouse River Railroad, Brian Simpson, 208.816.0730, [email protected] Bountiful Grain and Craig Mountain – Neil Cox, 208-365-6353, [email protected] Pend Orielle Valley Railroad – Kelly Driver, 509.445.1090, [email protected] St. Maries River Railroad – Bill Barnholt, 208.245.4531, [email protected] Washington and Idaho – Stan Patterson, (509) 523-4445, [email protected] Water Port of Lewiston – David Doeringsfeld, 208-743-5531, [email protected] Air Bill Statham (ITD), (208) 334-8784, [email protected] .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Billings Area Emergency Response Action Plan
BILLINGS AREA EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTION PLAN PHMSA Sequence Number 2988 Owner/Operator: Phillips 66 3010 Briarpark Drive Houston, Texas 77024 24-Hour Number: (800) 231-2551 or (877) 267-2290 Page A7-1 Confidentiality Notice: This document is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains information that is considered to be proprietary to Phillips 66. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. Billings Area Appendix 7: Response Zone Appendix ERAP Appendix 7: ERAP Table of Contents 7.1 Area Information .......................................................................................................... 1 7.1.1 Tank Table ....................................................................................................... 2 7.2 Communication Equipment ......................................................................................... 2 7.3 Notification Sequence ................................................................................................. 2 7.4 Emergency Notification Contact List ........................................................................... 5 7.5 Emergency Response Equipment, Testing & Deployment ......................................... 9 7.6 Immediate Actions ..................................................................................................... 10 7.7 Maps and Diagrams .................................................................................................. 12 7.8 Response Forms ......................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Parks & Recreation Board Agenda Headwaters
PARKS & RECREATION BOARD AGENDA HEADWATERS CONFERENCE ROOM 600 Cregg Ln. Missoula, Montana July 9, 2019, 12:00 PM I. Administrative Business A Roll Call-- History Members Present: Dale Harris, Sonja Verlanic, Wendy Ninteman, John O’Connor, Johnna Eisenman Members Absent: Chris Ryan, Ross Mollenhauer Guests: Madison Doner; NBC Montana Staff Present: Donna Gaukler, Ryan Applegate, Cassy Gladwin B Approval of minutes - June 11, 2019 Meeting-- History Wendy Ninteman moved to approve the minutes. Sonja Verlanic seconded the motion. Minutes were approved as posted C Announcements-- History Montana Rail Link Park ribbon cutting ceremony is planned for Thursday, July 11, 2019 D Public/Guest comments-- none History II. Action Items A Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Requests and Prioritizations--Ryan History Applegate Ryan Applegate gave a presentation on the departments fiscal year 2020 budget requests and prioritizations. Ryan outlined the department’s mission, strategic goals, and funding priorities. The main operating budgets from fiscal year 2017 to 2019 were also reviewed. The committee made discussed the presentation and discussed the ranking of priorities. Dale Harris – how much was funded in the previous fiscal year? Ryan Applegate – around $100,000 in budget enhancement requests. Park District allow any savings to be retained which is a benefit in budgeting. Sonja Verlanic – can the department ask for a budget when taking on new maintenance of parks, boulevards, etc.? Donna Gaukler –cost to maintain is provided by department upfront; won’t receive operational funding new park/boulevard, etc. is up and running, Dale Harris – Park District increase contribution to Aquatics Ryan Applegate - contribution from Park District was included in FY2019 requests but not funded.
[Show full text]
3.0 State Rail Planning
2010 Montana State Rail Plan 3.0 State Rail Planning 3.1 MONTANA RAIL SYSTEM SUMMARY In 2006, eight freight railroads operated 3,238 rail miles in Montana (excluding trackage rights).26 These eight carriers include: BNSF Railway (BNSF); Union Pacific (UP); Dakota, Missouri Valley, and Western (DMVW); Montana Rail Link (MRL); Central Montana Rail (CMR); Mission Mountain Railroad (MMR); Yellowstone Valley Railroad (YVR); and Rarus/Butte, Anaconda, and Pacific Railway (BAP). Table 3.1 summarizes the rail miles contributed by each carrier and Figure 3.1 illustrates the State’s freight railroad network. Table 3.1 Montana Railroad Statistics Miles of Railroad Operated in Montana 2000 2005 2006 BNSF Railway 2,135 1,983 1,942 Union Pacific 125 125 125 Class I Railroads Total 2,260 2,108 2,067 Dakota, Missouri Valley, and Western 57 58 58 Montana Rail Link 812 807 807 Regional Railroads Total 869 865 865 Central Montana Rail 87 88 88 Mission Mountain Railroad N/A 39 39 Yellowstone Valley Railroad N/A 186 186 Montana Western Railway 59 N/A N/A Butte, Anaconda and Pacific Railway 69 25 25 Local Railroads Total 215 338 338 Network Total 3,344 3,311 3,270 Source: 2005 and 2006 data from the Association of American Railroads, 2000 data from the 2000 Montana State Rail Plan Update. Note: Miles operated includes trackage rights. One mile of single track is counted the same as one mile of double track. 26 Rail miles, synonymous with route miles, represents the total miles of road in freight service operation.
[Show full text]
Freight Tariff MRL 8000-F (Cancels Freight Tariff MRL 8000-E)
Freight Tariff MRL 8000-F (Cancels Freight Tariff MRL 8000-E) Naming Local Rates and Distances and Miscellaneous Rules and Charges Applying at and between Stations on Montana Rail Link, Inc. Local Tariff This tariff is also applicable on intrastate traffic, except where expressly stated otherwise provided to the contrary in connection with particular rates and provisions contained herein. Issued: December 1, 2018 Effective: January 1, 2019 Issued By: Montana Rail Link, Inc. P.O. Box 16390 101 International Drive Missoula, MT 59808 1 Contents ITEM 450 CALCULATION OF DISTANCES PART 1 RULES AND OTHER GOVERNING ON MRL ...................................................... 9 PROVISIONS ....................................................... 5 PART 2 LOCAL RATES AND DISTANCES ............ 10 SECTION 1 – GENERAL.................................... 5 SECTION 1 – SPECIFIC COMMODITY RATES . 10 ITEM 1 CANCELLATION NOTICE ................ 5 ITEM 500 CARLOAD FUEL SURCHARGE... 10 ITEM 2 EXEMPT FROM REGULATION ........ 5 ITEM 510 COMMODITY: ......................... 10 ITEM 4 CAPACITIES, LENGTHS, AND SECTION 2 – DISTANCE COMMODITY RATES DIMENSIONS OF CARS ................................ 5 ..................................................................... 10 ITEM 5 DESCRIPTION OF GOVERNING ITEM 600 COMMODITY: ......................... 10 CLASSIFICATION ......................................... 5 ITEM 610 COMMODITY: ......................... 11 ITEM 8 APPLICATION OF INCREASES ......... 5 ITEM 620 COMMODITY: ......................... 11 ITEM 9 DISPOSITION
[Show full text]
Foundation for Community Health 2013-2015 Annual Report
2013-2015 ANNUAL REPORT A NEW CHAPTER 1 2 Strong History & New Opportunities Looking back on the changes in the life of our Foundation, the The last 12-18 months have brought significant change to ever-constant presence is you, our donors and volunteers. our Foundation with the sale of Community Medical Center. Your support for the health and well-being of our greater The transition to our new purpose to provide philanthropic community was the reason Community Medical Center support for the advancement of healthy lives in Western Foundation came into being in 1988. You made gifts. You Montana along with our new name, Foundation for served on our committees and Board. You invited others Community Health, has provided the Board with new and to join with you. Working together, we provided more than exciting philanthropic opportunities. $11 million for hospital programs and care initiatives like the Women’s and Newborn Center, healthcare scholarships As we look to the future, the Board and Staff are dedicated and public health presentations. One can only imagine the to advancing the need for “healthy lives” and we extend our numbers of lives impacted, but each of us can readily picture invitation to all to partner with us in that effort. It is a worthy some of the faces of those we have served, young and old Dorcie Dvarishkis Barry Kenfield cause. alike. Thank you for creating such a strong Foundation. On behalf of the Board and Staff of the Foundation for When Community Medical Center sold to a for-profit Community Health, we thank you for your past and future entity in January 2015, a new chapter began for us.
[Show full text]
Montana Kaimin, November 3, 1987 Associated Students of the University of Montana
University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Associated Students of the University of Montana Montana Kaimin, 1898-present (ASUM) 11-3-1987 Montana Kaimin, November 3, 1987 Associated Students of the University of Montana Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/studentnewspaper Recommended Citation Associated Students of the University of Montana, "Montana Kaimin, November 3, 1987" (1987). Montana Kaimin, 1898-present. 7960. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/studentnewspaper/7960 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Associated Students of the University of Montana (ASUM) at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Montana Kaimin, 1898-present by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Montana Kaimin University of Montana Tuesday/November 3, 1987 Missoula, Montana Schwinden: my criticisms meant to help By Rebecca Manna sentative Harry Fritz said he Kaimin Reporter thought it was unfortunate Gov. Ted Schwinden said that Schwinden publicly spoke Monday he believes it’s the out against the university sys responsibility of your best tem. friend to tell you what your Fritz criticized Schwinden problems are. for accusing university-system It was in this context, he officials of misrepresenting said, that he tried to offer the their financial need: “That’s university system constructive not true, it’s the worst critique criticism during a controver you could make,” he said. sial speech last Thursday at Fritz said, “He (Schwinden) the Board of Regents meeting and Ray Peck (Rep.-D, Havre) in Bozeman.
[Show full text]
93-103 in the SUPREME COURT of the STATE of MONTANA 1993 MONTANA RAIL LINK Petitioner/Respondent, M. JANE BYARD and the MONTANA
NO. 93-103 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1993 MONTANA RAIL LINK Petitioner/Respondent, -v- M. JANE BYARD and the MONTANA HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, Respondents/Appellants. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, In and for the County of Missoula, The Honorable Edward P. McLean, Judge presiding. COUNSEL OF RECORD: For Appellant: Edward A. Murphy, Datsopoulos, MacDonald & Lind, Missoula, Montana For Respondents: David Rusoff, Human Rights Commission, Helena, Montana: Joan Jonkel, Missoula, Montana Submitted on Briefs: July 20, 1993 Decided: September 16, 1993 Filed: Justice James C. Nelson delivered the Opinion of the Court. Before the Court is Petitioner's appeal from a Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, order affirming the Montana Human Rights Commission determination that Montana Rail Link (MRL) discriminated against the Respondent M. Jane Byard (Byard) in violation of the Montana Human Rights Act, based on her sex. We affirm. We restate the issues on appeal: I. Did the hearing examiner err in allowing Byard to amend her complaint? II. Did the hearing examiner err in allowing the testimony of Dr. Hacker? III. Did the hearing examiner err in prohibiting the testimony of Ron Dean? IV. Did the hearing examiner err in concluding that MRL subjected Byard to discriminatory treatment? V. Did the hearing examiner err in concluding that MRL's hiring practices had a disparate impact on women? BACKGROUND Byard was hired by Burlington Northern Railroad (BN) in 1977. She received a promotion in November of 1978 when she became an engineer. Byard is currently employed as a BN engineer in Havre, Montana, although she is on a leave of absence.
[Show full text]
Railroad Industry Modal Profile an Outline of the Railroad Industry Workforce Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities
Railroad Industry Modal Profile An Outline of the Railroad Industry Workforce Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities October 2011 Version: Release_v3.0 DOT/FRA/ORD-11/20 The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views, positions, or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation or the Federal Government. Reference to any specific programs does not constitute official Federal Government endorsement or approval of the programs, the views they express, or the services they offer. TABLE of CONTENTS 1. Overview of the Railroad Industry ....................................................................................... 7 2. Current Railroad Workforce ................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Total Estimated Railroad Workforce ............................................................................11 2.1.1 Class I Freight Railroad Companies .....................................................................12 2.1.2 Class I Passenger Railroad: Amtrak ...................................................................13 2.1.3 Regional and Short Line Railroad Companies......................................................14 2.1.4 Manufacturers and Suppliers ...............................................................................14 2.1.5 Union Representation ..........................................................................................14 2.1.6 Major Associations ...............................................................................................14
[Show full text]
Federal Register/Vol. 66, No. 113/Tuesday, June 12, 2001/Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 66, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 12, 2001 / Notices 31751 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION of the carriers controlled by Watco; and Pacific Railroad Company (UP). In (iii) the transaction does not involve a addition, K&O will acquire, by Surface Transportation Board Class I carrier. Therefore, the transaction assignment from CKR, incidental [STB Finance Docket No. 34042] is exempt from the prior approval trackage rights over seven segments of requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323. See 49 rail line in the State of Kansas owned by Watco Companies, Inc.—Continuance CFR 1180.2(d)(2). the UP and The Burlington Northern in Control Exemption—Kansas & Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF). Oklahoma Railroad, Inc. may not use its exemption authority to K&O will acquire from CKR the relieve a rail carrier of its statutory following rail lines located in the State Watco Companies, Inc. (Watco), a obligation to protect the interests of its of Kansas: noncarrier, has filed a verified notice of employees. Section 11326(c), however, (1) The Salina Subdivision rail line exemption to continue in control of does not provide for labor protection for between milespost 20 + 492 feet, at Kansas & Oklahoma Railroad, Inc. transactions under sections 11324 and Salina, and milepost 103.34, at Osborne; (K&O), upon K&O’s becoming a carrier. 11325 that involve only Class III rail (2) The Scott City Subdivision rail This transaction is related to two carriers. Because this transaction line between milepost 0.0, at Great concurrently filed verified notices of involves Class III rail carriers only, the Bend, and milepost 120 + 1338.7 feet, at exemption: STB Finance Docket No.
[Show full text]
MRL) Alberton, MT July 3, 2014
Federal Railroad Administration Office of Railroad Safety Accident and Analysis Branch Accident Investigation Report HQ-2014-8 Montana Rail Link (MRL) Alberton, MT July 3, 2014 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report, including this one, made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. U.S. Department of Transportation FRA File #HQ-2014-8 Federal Railroad Administration FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT TRAIN SUMMARY 1. Name of Railroad Operating Train #1 1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. Montana Rail Link MRL 2014093 GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance 1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. Montana Rail Link MRL 2014093 2. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing Identification Number 3. Date of Accident/Incident 4. Time of Accident/Incident 7/3/2014 12:00 AM 5. Type of Accident/Incident Derailment 6. Cars Carrying 7. HAZMAT Cars 8. Cars Releasing 9. People 10. Subdivision HAZMAT 16 Damaged/Derailed 3 HAZMAT 0 Evacuated 0 Fourth 11. Nearest City/Town 12. Milepost (to nearest tenth) 13. State Abbr. 14. County Alberton 164.4 MT MINERAL 15. Temperature (F) 16. Visibility 17. Weather 18. Type of Track 90 ̊ F Day Clear Main 19. Track Name/Number 20. FRA Track Class 21. Annual Track Density 22. Time Table Direction (gross tons in millions) Main Freight Trains-60, Passenger Trains-80 West 53 U.S.
[Show full text]
Federal Register/Vol. 74, No. 190/Friday, October 2
50998 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 190 / Friday, October 2, 2009 / Notices the United States may announce to attached, it is sufficient to type ‘‘See pursuant to 15 CFR 2006.13, except implement the decision. attached’’ in the ‘‘Type Comment and confidential business information China alleges that the higher tariffs, Upload File’’ field. exempt from public inspection in not having been justified as emergency A person requesting that information accordance with 15 CFR 2006.15 or action under relevant WTO rules, are contained in a comment submitted by information determined by USTR to be inconsistent with Article I:1 of the that person be treated as confidential confidential in accordance with 19 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade business information must certify that U.S.C. 2155(g)(2). Comments open to 1994 (‘‘GATT 1994’’). China also alleges such information is business public inspection may be viewed on the that these measures have not been confidential and would not customarily http://www.regulations.gov Web site. properly justified pursuant to Article be released to the public by the XIX of the GATT 1994 and the WTO submitter. Confidential business Daniel Brinza, Agreement on Safeguards. China also information must be clearly designated Assistant United States Trade Representative alleges that these measures have not as such and the submission must be for Monitoring and Enforcement. been properly justified as China-specific marked ‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’ [FR Doc. E9–23829 Filed 10–1–09; 8:45 am] restrictions under the Protocol on the at the top and bottom of the cover page BILLING CODE 3190–W9–P Accession of the People’s Republic of and each succeeding page.
[Show full text]
Federal Register/Vol. 74, No. 190/Friday, October 2, 2009/Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 190 / Friday, October 2, 2009 / Notices 50999 Railroad, Inc. In that proceeding, Watco DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION transaction is not part of a series of seeks to continue in control of BVR, anticipated transactions that would upon BVR’s becoming a Class III rail Surface Transportation Board connect these rail lines with any other carrier. [STB Finance Docket No. 35260] railroad in the Watco corporate family; The transaction is scheduled to be and (3) the transaction does not involve a Class I rail carrier. Therefore, the consummated on or after October 16, Watco Companies, Inc.—Continuance transaction is exempt from the prior 2009, (the effective date of the in Control Exemption—Boise Valley Railroad, Inc. approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. exemption). 11323. See 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2). BVR certifies that its projected annual Watco Companies, Inc. (Watco), a Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board revenues as a result of this transaction noncarrier, has filed a verified notice of may not use its exemption authority to will not result in BVR becoming a Class exemption under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2) to relieve a rail carrier of its statutory II or Class I rail carrier and further continue in control of Boise Valley obligation to protect the interests of its certifies that its projected annual Railroad, Inc. (BVR), upon BVR’s employees. Section 11326(c), however, 1 revenue will not exceed $5 million. becoming a Class III rail carrier. does not provide for labor protection for This transaction is related to a transactions under sections 11324 and Pursuant to the Consolidated concurrently filed verified notice of 11325 that involve only Class III rail Appropriations Act, 2008, Public Law exemption in STB Finance Docket No.
[Show full text]