DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploitative and Explorative Attentional Mechanisms Salv

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploitative and Explorative Attentional Mechanisms Salv 1 Investigating the Temporal Dynamics of Covert Visual Spatial Attention: Exploitative and Explorative Attentional Mechanisms Salvatore Simone Russo School of Psychology The University of Adelaide A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy February 2020 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................. 2 Abstract............................................................................................................................................. 4 Declaration ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................... 7 List of Publications............................................................................................................................ 8 List of Conference Presentations........................................................................................................ 9 CHAPTER 1: General Introduction ................................................................................................. 10 1.1 Attention................................................................................................................................ 11 1.2 Attention and Learning .......................................................................................................... 14 1.3 Attentional Learning Theories ................................................................................................ 17 1.3.1 Mackintosh.(1975) Model ............................................................................................... 18 1.3.2 Pearce-Hall (1980) Model ............................................................................................... 22 1.4 Time ...................................................................................................................................... 25 1.5 Electroencephalography ......................................................................................................... 32 1.6 General Aims and Chapter Summary ..................................................................................... 34 CHAPTER 2: Exploring the Dot Probe Task and the N2pc .............................................................. 39 2.1. Experiment 1 ........................................................................................................................ 39 2.1.1. Method .......................................................................................................................... 41 2.1.2. Results ........................................................................................................................... 49 2.1.3. Discussion...................................................................................................................... 54 2.2. Experiment 2 ........................................................................................................................ 55 2.2.1. Method .......................................................................................................................... 55 2.2.2. Results ........................................................................................................................... 57 2.2.3. Discussion...................................................................................................................... 61 2.3. Experiment 3 ........................................................................................................................ 63 2.3.1. Method .......................................................................................................................... 63 2.3.2. Results ........................................................................................................................... 66 2.3.3. Discussion...................................................................................................................... 71 2.5. General Discussion ............................................................................................................... 72 CHAPTER 3: Multiple SOAs .......................................................................................................... 76 3 3.1. Experiments 4 and 5.............................................................................................................. 78 3.1.1. Method .......................................................................................................................... 79 3.1.3. Discussion...................................................................................................................... 90 3.3. Experiment 6 ........................................................................................................................ 98 3.3.1. Method ........................................................................................................................ 103 3.3.2. Results ......................................................................................................................... 107 3.3.3. Discussion.................................................................................................................... 114 3.4. General Discussion ............................................................................................................. 116 CHAPTER 4: Automaticity and Learning ...................................................................................... 119 4.1. Experiment 7 ...................................................................................................................... 122 4.2.1. Method ........................................................................................................................ 123 4.2.2. Results ......................................................................................................................... 125 4.2.3. Discussion.................................................................................................................... 128 4.2. Experiment 8 ...................................................................................................................... 133 4.1.1. Method ........................................................................................................................ 134 4.1.2. Results ......................................................................................................................... 137 4.1.3. Discussion.................................................................................................................... 143 4.3. Experiment 9 ...................................................................................................................... 147 4.3.1. Method ........................................................................................................................ 148 4.3.2. Results ......................................................................................................................... 151 4.3.3. Discussion.................................................................................................................... 153 4.4. General Discussion ............................................................................................................. 156 CHAPTER 5: General Discussion ................................................................................................. 160 References .................................................................................................................................... 184 Appendix A: Latencies and probe locked ERPs at each SOA for Experiments 4 and 5 ................... 200 Appendix B: Latencies and probe locked ERPs at each SOA for Experiments 6 ............................. 207 Appendix C: Discussion of cue-locked N2pc ................................................................................. 215 Appendix D: Latencies, CS onset and probe locked ERPs at each SOA for Experiments 7 ............. 222 Appendix E: Latencies, CS onset and probe locked ERPs at each SOA for Experiment 8 ............... 231 Appendix F: Latencies, CS onset and probe locked ERPs at each SOA for Experiment 9 ............... 239 Appendix G: Attention Modulated Auto-Associator....................................................................... 247 4 Abstract This thesis explores how trial and error learning affects attentional processes. Previous research has shown that selective attention tends to be biased towards cues that accurately and consistently predict future events. Paying attention to predictive cues is adaptive because an animal can use the information that these cues convey to predict future events and change their behaviour accordingly. However, some research has shown that selective attention can be biased towards non-predictive, or uncertain, stimuli. Paying attention to non-predictive cues could also be adaptive because it could help establish the true nature of these currently uncertain stimuli. Although selective attention can be driven by both high and low levels of uncertainty, the factors that determine which driving force prevails are not fully understood. This thesis investigates whether time is one such factor. The experiments presented here involved training participants on a categorisation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Multiple Electrophysiological Markers of Visual-Attentional Processing in a Novel Task Directed Toward Clinical Use
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Ophthalmology Volume 2012, Article ID 618654, 11 pages doi:10.1155/2012/618654 Research Article Multiple Electrophysiological Markers of Visual-Attentional Processing in a Novel Task Directed toward Clinical Use Julie Bolduc-Teasdale,1, 2, 3 Pierre Jolicoeur,2, 3 and Michelle McKerral1, 2, 3 1 Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Lucie-Bruneau Rehabilitation Centre, 2275 Laurier Avenue East, Montreal, QC, Canada H2H 2N8 2 Centre for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognition, University of Montreal, C.P. 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC, Canada H3C 3J7 3 Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, C.P. 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC, Montr´eal, QC, Canada H3C 3J7 Correspondence should be addressed to Michelle McKerral, [email protected] Received 2 July 2012; Accepted 16 September 2012 Academic Editor: Shigeki Machida Copyright © 2012 Julie Bolduc-Teasdale et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Individuals who have sustained a mild brain injury (e.g., mild traumatic brain injury or mild cerebrovascular stroke) are at risk to show persistent cognitive symptoms (attention and memory) after the acute postinjury phase. Although studies have shown that those patients perform normally on neuropsychological tests, cognitive symptoms remain present, and there is a need for more precise diagnostic tools. The aim of this study was to develop precise and sensitive markers for the diagnosis of post brain injury deficits in visual and attentional functions which could be easily translated in a clinical setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Attention to Features Precedes Attention to Locations in Visual Search: Evidence from Electromagnetic Brain Responses in Humans
    1822 • The Journal of Neuroscience, February 25, 2004 • 24(8):1822–1832 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive Attention to Features Precedes Attention to Locations in Visual Search: Evidence from Electromagnetic Brain Responses in Humans Jens-Max Hopf,1,2 Kai Boelmans,1 Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld,1 Steven J. Luck,3 and Hans-Jochen Heinze1 1Department of Neurology II, Otto-von-Guericke-University, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany, 2Leibniz-Institute for Neurobiology, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany, and 3Department of Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1407 Single-unit recordings in macaque extrastriate cortex have shown that attentional selection of nonspatial features can operate in a location-independent manner. Here, we investigated analogous neural correlates at the neural population level in human observers by using simultaneous event-related potential (ERP) and event-related magnetic field (ERMF) recordings. The goals were to determine (1) whether task-relevant features are selected before attention is allocated to the location of the target, and (2) whether this selection reflects the locations of the relevant features. A visual search task was used in which the spatial distribution of nontarget items with attended feature values was varied independently of the location of the target. The presence of task-relevant features in a given location led to a changeinERP/ERMFactivitybeginningϳ140msecafterstimulusonset,withaneuraloriginintheventraloccipito-temporalcortex.This effect was independent of the location of the actual target. This effect was followed by lateralized activity reflecting the allocation of attention to the location of the target (the well known N2pc component), which began at ϳ170 msec poststimulus. Current source localization indicated that the allocation of attention to the location of the target originated in more anterior regions of occipito-temporal cortex anterior than the feature-related effects.
    [Show full text]
  • XXIII National Congress of the Italian Society of Psychophysiology Main
    XXIII National Congress of the Italian Society of Psychophysiology – Scientific Program XXIII National Congress of the Italian Society of Psychophysiology PROCEEDINGS - ABSTRACTS Main lectures Sinigaglia C. The space of action 51 Strata P. The responsible mind 51 Symposia abstracts Addabbo M. - Bolognini N. - Nava E. - Turati C. The processing of others’ touch early in human development 53 Betti V. Dynamic reorganization of functional connectivity 54 during naturalist viewing Bevilacqua V. Home environment perception and virtual reality: cognitive 55 and emotional reactions to domotic induced changes of colours and sounds Bocci T. From metaplasticity to interhemispheric connectivity: 56 electrophysiological interrogation of human visual cortical circuits in health and disease Bortoletto M. TMS-EEG coregistration in the exploration of human cortical 57 connectivity Bove M. An integrated approach to investigate the human neuroplasticity 57 Brattico E. The impact of sound environments on the brain circuits 58 for mood, emotion, and pain Cattaneo L. The motor cortex as integrator in sensorimotor behavior 59 Cecchetti L. How (lack of) vision shapes the morphological architecture 60 of the human brain: congenital blindness affects diencephalic but not mesencephalic structures Neuropsychological Trends – 18/2015 http://www.ledonline.it/neuropsychologicaltrends/ 6 XXIII National Congress of the Italian Society of Psychophysiology – Scientific Program Costantini M. Objects within the sensorimotor system 61 De Cesarei A. - Codispoti M. Relationship between perception and emotional responses 61 to static natural scenes De Pascalis V. - Scacchia P. Influence of pain expectation and hypnotizability 62 on auditory startle responses during placebo analgesia in waking and hypnosis: a brain potential study Garbarini F. Feeling sensations on the other’s body after brain damages 63 Gazzola V.
    [Show full text]
  • Functionally Dissociated Aspects in Anterior and Posterior Electrocortical Processing of Facial Threat
    International Journal of Psychophysiology 53 (2004) 29–36 Functionally dissociated aspects in anterior and posterior electrocortical processing of facial threat Dennis J.L.G. Schutter*, Edward H.F. de Haan, Jack van Honk Helmholtz Research Institute, Affective Neuroscience Section, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands Received 12 June 2003; received in revised form 1 October 2003; accepted 15 January 2004 Available Online 9 April 2004 Abstract The angry facial expression is an important socially threatening stimulus argued to have evolved to regulate social hierarchies. In the present study, event-related potentials (ERP) were used to investigate the involvement and temporal dynamics of the frontal and parietal regions in the processing of angry facial expressions. Angry, happy and neutral faces were shown to eighteen healthy right-handed volunteers in a passive viewing task. Stimulus-locked ERPs were recorded from the frontal and parietal scalp sites. The P200, N300 and early contingent negativity variation (eCNV) components of the electric brain potentials were investigated. Analyses revealed statistical significant reductions in P200 amplitudes for the angry facial expression on both frontal and parietal electrode sites. Furthermore, apart from being strongly associated with the anterior P200, the N300 showed to be more negative for the angry facial expression in the anterior regions also. Finally, the eCNV was more pronounced over the parietal sites for the angry facial expressions. The present study demonstrated specific electrocortical correlates underlying the processing of angry facial expressions in the anterior and posterior brain sectors. The P200 is argued to indicate valence tagging by a fast and early detection mechanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Homologues of Human Event-Related Potential Components in Nonhuman
    MONKEY ERPs 1 In press: to appear in The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components. Luck, S.J. & Kappenman, E.S. (Eds.), New York: Oxford University Press. Homologues of human ERP components in nonhuman primates Geoffrey F. Woodman Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience Running Head: MONKEY ERPs Correspondence from the editor/publisher should be addressed to: Geoffrey F. Woodman Department of Psychology Vanderbilt University PMB 407817 2301 Vanderbilt Place Nashville, TN 37240-7817 615-343-8901 (telephone) 615-343-8449 (fax) [email protected] (e-mail) MONKEY ERPs 2 Like many electrophysiologists who record the electroencephalogram (EEG) and event- related potentials (ERPs) from humans, I was a heavy user of the techniques before I became aware of the fact that EEG activity was originally observed during recordings from animals, including nonhuman primates (Caton, 1875). It was the 50-year-old studies with animals that motivated Hans Berger’s discovery and naming of the EEG recorded from his son, Klaus, and other human subjects (Berger, 1929). Moreover, many users of the ERP technique may be surprised to learn just how rarely the ERP components we use as tools to study human cognition have been studied in other model species, such as nonhuman primates. This chapter chronicles the discovery of ERP components in nonhuman primates. I focus mainly on monkeys but also include evidence from other species when it exists. The discussion generally unfolds chronologically beginning with work from the 19th century and continuing up through current research. During this review I will address differences in the methods and tasks that have been utilized to record ERPs in the different species.
    [Show full text]
  • Auditory P300 and N100 Components As Intermediate Phenotypes for Psychotic Disorder: Familial Liability and Reliability ⇑ Claudia J.P
    Clinical Neurophysiology 122 (2011) 1984–1990 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Clinical Neurophysiology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/clinph Auditory P300 and N100 components as intermediate phenotypes for psychotic disorder: Familial liability and reliability ⇑ Claudia J.P. Simons a,b, , Anke Sambeth c, Lydia Krabbendam a,e, Stefanie Pfeifer a, Jim van Os a,d, Wim J. Riedel c a Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, European Graduate School of Neuroscience, SEARCH, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands b GGzE, Institute of Mental Health Care Eindhoven en de Kempen, P.O. Box 909, 5600 AX Eindhoven, The Netherlands c Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands d Visiting Professor of Psychiatric Epidemiology, King’s College London, King’s Health Partners, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, UK e Centre Brain and Learning, Department of Psychology and Education, VU University Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands article info highlights Article history: A reliable N100 latency delay was found in unaffected siblings of patients with a psychotic disorder. Accepted 28 February 2011 P300 amplitude and latency were not found to be affected in siblings. Available online 1 April 2011 Short-term test–retest reliability of N100 and P300 components were sound across patients, siblings and controls, with the main exception of N100 latency in patients. Keywords: Electroencephalography Event-related potentials abstract Psychoses Schizophrenia Objective: Abnormalities of the auditory P300 are a robust finding in patients with psychosis. The pur- Test–retest poses of this study were to determine whether patients with a psychotic disorder and their unaffected Relatives siblings show abnormalities in P300 and N100 and to establish test–retest reliabilities for these ERP com- ponents.
    [Show full text]
  • Inability to Suppress Salient Distractors Predicts Low Visual Working Memory
    Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low SEE COMMENTARY visual working memory capacity John M. Gaspara,1, Gregory J. Christiea, David J. Primeb, Pierre Jolicœurc, and John J. McDonalda,1 aDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada; bDepartment of Psychology, Douglas College, New Westminster, British Columbia, V3M 5Z5, Canada; and cCentre de Recherche en Neuropsychologie et Cognition, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3J7, Canada Edited by Michael I. Posner, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, and approved January 26, 2016 (received for review December 1, 2015) According to contemporary accounts of visual working memory Precise characterization of individual differences in filtering effi- (vWM), the ability to efficiently filter relevant from irrelevant in- ciency requires not only a method for determining what items gain formation contributes to an individual’s overall vWM capacity. Al- access to vWM but also a method for isolating processes associ- though there is mounting evidence for this hypothesis, very little is ated with the two diametrically opposed facets of filtering. Be- known about the precise filtering mechanism responsible for control- havioral measures (e.g., negative priming) have been used to study ling access to vWM and for differentiating low- and high-capacity in- the link between attention and vWM capacity (17, 18), but given dividuals. Theoretically, the inefficient filtering observed in low- the difficulty in linking such measures to specific processes (e.g., capacity individuals might be specifically linked to problems enhancing perceptual inhibition, memory retrieval), existing behavioral results relevant items, suppressing irrelevant items, or both. To find out, we do not clearly indicate whether individual differences in capacity recorded neurophysiological activity associated with attentional selec- are related to selective enhancement or suppression.
    [Show full text]
  • Early-Stage Visual Processing Abnormalities in ASD by Investigating Erps Elicited in a Visual of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40202 Oddball Task Using Illusory Figures
    Communication • DOI: 10.2478/v10134-010-0024-9 • Translational Neuroscience • 1(2) •2010 •177–187 Translational Neuroscience EARLy-stAGE VISUAL PROCESSING ABNORMALITIES Joshua M. Baruth1*, Manuel F. Casanova1,2, Lonnie Sears3, IN high-funcTIONING AUTISM 2 SPECTRUM DISORDEr (ASD) Estate Sokhadze Abstract 1Department of Anatomical Sciences and It has been reported that individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have abnormal responses to the Neurobiology, University of Louisville sensory environment. For these individuals sensory overload can impair functioning, raise physiological School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40202 stress, and adversely affect social interaction. Early-stage (i.e. within 200 ms of stimulus onset) auditory 2 processing abnormalities have been widely examined in ASD using event-related potentials (ERP), while Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral ERP studies investigating early-stage visual processing in ASD are less frequent. We wanted to test the Sciences, University of Louisville School hypothesis of early-stage visual processing abnormalities in ASD by investigating ERPs elicited in a visual of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40202 oddball task using illusory figures. Our results indicate that individuals with ASD have abnormally large 3Department of Pediatrics, University of cortical responses to task irrelevant stimuli over both parieto-occipital and frontal regions-of-interest Louisville School of Medicine, (ROI) during early stages of visual processing compared to the control group. Furthermore, ASD patients showed signs of an overall disruption in stimulus discrimination, and had a significantly higher rate of Louisville, KY 40202 motor response errors. Keywords Autism • Event-related potentials • EEG • Visual processing • Evoked potentials Received 8 June 2010 © Versita Sp. z o.o.
    [Show full text]
  • Lateralized Suppression of Alpha-Band EEG Activity As a Mechanism of Target Processing
    900 • The Journal of Neuroscience, January 30, 2019 • 39(5):900–917 Behavioral/Cognitive Lateralized Suppression of Alpha-Band EEG Activity As a Mechanism of Target Processing Felix Bacigalupo1,2,3,4 and XSteven J. Luck1 1Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, California 95616, 2Escuela de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Pontificia Universidad Cato´lica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 3Departamento de Psiquiatría, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Cato´lica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, and 4Centro Interdisciplinario de Neurociencia, Pontificia Universidad Cato´lica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. Alpha-band (8–12 Hz) EEG activity has been linked to visual attention since the earliest EEG studies. More recent studies using spatial cuing paradigms have shown that alpha is suppressed over the hemisphere contralateral to a to-be-attended location, suggesting that alpha serves as a mechanism of preparatory attention. Here, we demonstrate that alpha also plays a role in active target processing. EEG activity was recorded from a group of healthy male and female human subjects in two visual search experiments. In addition to alpha activity, we also assessed the N2pc event-related potential component, a lateralized transient EEG response that has been tightly linked with the focusing of attention on visual targets. We found that the visual search targets triggered both an N2pc component and a suppression of alpha-band activity that was greatest over the hemisphere contralateral to the target (which we call “target-elicited lateralized alpha suppression” or TELAS). In Experiment 1, both N2pc and TELAS were observed for targets presented in the lower visual field but were absent for upper-field targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Difficulty of Discrimination Modulates Attentional Capture by Regulating Attentional Focus
    Difficulty of Discrimination Modulates Attentional Capture by Regulating Attentional Focus Risa Sawaki1,2 and Jun’ichi Katayama1 Downloaded from http://mitprc.silverchair.com/jocn/article-pdf/21/2/359/1759917/jocn.2008.21022.pdf by guest on 18 May 2021 Abstract & Attentional capture for distractors is enhanced by increas- results revealed that discrimination difficulty had opposite ing the difficulty of discrimination between the standard and effects on the P3a response between central and surround- the target in the three-stimulus oddball paradigm. In this ing locations. With an increase in the difficulty of discrim- study, we investigated the cognitive mechanism of this mod- ination, the P3a response was enhanced when distractor ulation of attentional capture. Event-related brain potentials stimuli were presented in the central location. In contrast, the were recorded from participants while they performed a visual P3a response was reduced when distractor stimuli were three-stimulus oddball paradigm (frequent standard, rare tar- presented in a surrounding location. This finding suggests get, and rare distractor). The discrimination difficulty between that spatial attention was focused by the difficulty of dis- standard and target was manipulated in the central location. crimination, and deviant processing was increased within its Distractor stimuli were presented in the central or surrounding focus but decreased outside its focus. Therefore, attentional locations. The P3a component was elicited by distractor stim- capture for deviant distractors is modulated by top–down uli and was used as a measure of attentional capture. The controlled attentional focus. & INTRODUCTION salience (Theeuwes, 2004; Friedman, Cycowicz, & Gaeta, In the external environment, we are faced with a vast 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Unspecific Hypervigilance and Spatial Attention in Early Visual Perception
    Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Advance Access published May 24, 2013 doi:10.1093/scan/nst044 SCAN (2013) 1 of 7 Timing the fearful brain: unspecific hypervigilance and spatial attention in early visual perception Mathias Weymar,1,2 Andreas Keil,2 and Alfons O. Hamm1 1Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology, University of Greifswald, 17487 Greifswald, Germany and 2Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention (CSEA), University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Numerous studies suggest that anxious individuals are more hypervigilant to threat in their environment than nonanxious individuals. In the present event-related potential (ERP) study, we sought to investigate the extent to which afferent cortical processes, as indexed by the earliest visual component C1, are biased in observers high in fear of specific objects. In a visual search paradigm, ERPs were measured while spider-fearful participants and controls searched for discrepant objects (e.g. spiders, butterflies, flowers) in visual arrays. Results showed enhanced C1 amplitudes in response to spatially directed target stimuli in spider-fearful participants only. Furthermore, enhanced C1 amplitudes were observed in response to all discrepant targets and distractors in spider-fearful compared with non-anxious participants, irrespective of fearful and non-fearful target contents. This pattern of results is in line with theoretical notions of heightened sensory sensitivity (hypervigilance) to external stimuli in high-fearful individuals. Specifically, the findings suggest that fear facilitates afferent cortical processing in the human visual cortex in a non-specific and temporally sustained fashion, when Downloaded from observers search for potential threat cues. Keywords: emotion; hypervigilance; spatial attention; C1; event-related potentials (ERPs) http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/ INTRODUCTION in specific object fear should show sensory facilitation when expecting Voluntary attention to a specific location in the environment results in to confront the feared object.
    [Show full text]
  • Cortical Mechanisms of Prioritizing Selection for Rejection in Visual Search
    4738 • The Journal of Neuroscience, May 16, 2018 • 38(20):4738–4748 Behavioral/Cognitive Cortical Mechanisms of Prioritizing Selection for Rejection in Visual Search X Sarah E. Donohue,1,2 XMandy V. Bartsch,2 Hans-Jochen Heinze,1,2 XMircea A. Schoenfeld,1,2,3 and XJens-Max Hopf1,2 1Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany, 2Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, 39118 Magdeburg, Germany, and 3Kliniken Schmieder Heidelberg, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany In visual search, the more one knows about a target, the faster one can find it. Surprisingly, target identification is also faster with knowledge about distractor-features. The latter is paradoxical, as it implies that to avoid the selection of an item, the item must somehow be selected to some degree. This conundrum has been termed the “ignoring paradox”, and, to date, little is known about how the brain resolves it. Here, in data from four experiments using neuromagnetic brain recordings in male and female humans, we provide evidence that this paradox is resolved by giving distracting information priority in cortical processing. This attentional priority to distractors manifests as an enhanced early neuromagnetic index, which occurs before target-related processing, and regardless of distractor pre- dictability. It is most pronounced on trials for which a response rapidly occurred, and is followed by a suppression of the distracting information. These observations together suggest that in visual search items cannot be ignored without first being selected. Key words: human; ignoring paradox; magnetoencephalography; visual attention; visual search Significance Statement How can we ignore distracting stimuli in our environment? To do this successfully, a logical hypothesis is that as few neural resources as possible should be devoted to distractor processing.
    [Show full text]