Sport Fishing C2362 Unit FISH-1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sport Fishing C2362 Unit FISH-1 EC Directorate-General for Fisheries Sport Fishing C2362 Unit FISH-1 FINAL REPORT EU contract FISH/2004/011 on “Sport Fisheries” (or Marine Recreational Fisheries) in the EU For The European Commission Directorate-General for Fisheries Prepared by M. G. Pawson1, D. Tingley2, G, Padda1, and H. Glenn 2 1. The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT, UK. 2. Centre for the Economics & Management of Aquatic Resources (CEMARE) Boathouse no 6, College Road, HM Naval Base, Portsmouth, PO1 3LJ, UK. Correspondence to M. G. Pawson; Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, NR33 OHT, UK tel: +44 1502 524436; e-mail: [email protected]. 1 EC Directorate-General for Fisheries Sport Fishing C2362 Unit FISH-1 EU contract FISH/2004/011 on “Sport Fisheries” (or Marine Recreational Fisheries) in the EU Table of Contents Page Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction and background 5 2. Definitions and legal perspectives 10 3. Description of European marine recreational fisheries 25 4. Evaluation of the socio-economic importance of marine 55 recreational fisheries in Europe 5. Environmental impacts of fishing on marine ecosystems 107 6. Issues and management 123 Annexes: 1. The legal definition and scope of sea fishing for recreation 136 and sport in Europe – in contrast to commercial fishing. 2. Information sources and references describing MRF in Europe 163 3. Review of methodology for economic evaluation of MRF 172 4. References on the economic evaluation of MRF 186 5. References on the environmental impacts of fishing 190 6. References for issues and management of MRF 207 Appendix 1. Common and scientific names of fish and shellfish species of interest to European recreational fishers. 2 EC Directorate-General for Fisheries Sport Fishing C2362 Unit FISH-1 Executive summary. This report provides a first assessment of marine recreational fisheries at the EU level. In it we evaluate their importance in environmental, social and economic terms, compared with commercial fisheries, explore public perception of any related problems and issues, and attempt to indicate the most important issues on which fisheries management should concentrate (Call for Tenders FISH/2004/011 “Sport Fisheries”). The study has been carried out by accessing available data (published or through web-sites) and through personal contact with individuals and organisations involved with recreational fisheries in the relevant countries. No original data were derived and, where possible, information was validated from more than one source. The report is divided into 6 chapters, structured in relation to the Terms of Reference of the Tender and broken down by the regions defined for Regional Advisory Committees, viz.: Baltic Sea, North Sea, North Western waters, South Western waters and Mediterranean Sea. In order to “describe sport fisheries at EU level by type of fishing, its social importance (time of occupation, associations, level of organisation), and its level of management by Member States” (TOR 1), it proved necessary to define what is meant by sport fishing in the context of recreational fishing. A review of European Member States’ national legislation (provided in Annex 1) revealed considerable variation in ownership and access to coastal waters/fisheries, and in the legal distinction between sport fishing and other recreational uses of fisheries (for example, where commercial fishing gear is used chiefly for home consumption) and their commercial (catching for sale and profit) counterparts. It has, however, clarified the issue and enabled us to suggest common definitions for the various forms of recreational fishing. Thus, Recreational fishing is fishing which is not deemed to be commercial fishing (i.e. it does not have sale or profit connotations), and is not undertaken for predominantly subsistence purposes. Angling is the activity of catching or attempting to catch fish on hooks, principally by rod and line, whilst recreational anglers do not sell the fish they catch. Sports fishing is generally perceived to be a sub-set of recreational angling, although the distinction varies between countries (and may be absent), is often associated with competitions, and may include underwater spear fishing. The review indicated that we should adopt ‘Marine Recreational Fishing’ for the overall title of the report and, as a consequence, the generic MRF is used wherever we refer to marine recreational fishing. On this basis, an exhaustive search of relevant websites and literature sources has been used to describe the recreational fisheries in each Member State, the gears used, species fished for, and level of involvement (as far as is possible). This information is presented, together with an appreciation of the social importance of these fisheries, management infrastructure (if any), and an exploration of public perception of the interactions between recreational and commercial fisheries and any issues arising (TOR 4: “to explore and summarize the results of existing polls of opinion about both sectors”). The main areas of conflict are competition for resources in terms of sharing mortality/catch and space/gear interactions, for example between anglers and nets set close inshore or around wrecks, and the perception that the use of some gears leads to over fishing. In northwest Europe (UK, Ireland, France and Norway), the availability 3 EC Directorate-General for Fisheries Sport Fishing C2362 Unit FISH-1 of large fish (possibly with a degree of exclusive access) is important to sport anglers, who increasingly practice catch and release as a conservation aid. Much of this information is pertinent to TOR 3: to describe and, where possible, assess the economic importance of sport fisheries and associated industries such as tourism, transport, tackle manufacturing and sale, etc. We have collated and reviewed readily available published information and data on the economic impact of recreational fishing (it is sometimes difficult to distinguish between marine and freshwater activity) in the different Member States. Using readily accessible data for a variety of years ranging from 1997-2005, but lacking figures for Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Portugal and Slovenia, we estimate that at least ten million people are active in the MRF sector in Europe. Any assessment of the economic importance of recreational fishing requires careful consideration of the geographic coverage and quality of available information for each country and the variety of methods used to prepare existing studies or reports, whether to arrive at an EU-wide valuation or to compare these values with commercial fishing activity. At present, it is not possible to produce a comprehensive, quantitative overview of the importance of MRF because the information is neither available for each country nor is it in a consistent format. This suggests that new studies are required to provide robust information upon which to make decisions, and we have included a description of the methodological approaches to this task in Annex 3. In order “to describe and, where possible, assess the environmental impact of sport fisheries and associated industries, including the relative importance of catch of target species, by-catch, lost gear, use of bait, etc, and how this compares with the environmental effects of commercial fisheries” (TOR 2), we have reviewed what is know about the environmental effects of commercial fisheries on benthic fauna, habitat, diversity and community structure in a European context. This provides a perspective against which to view whether it is possible or necessary to predict or manage MRF-induced changes in marine ecosystems. These, and the most important issues on which fisheries management should concentrate to alleviate problems associated with MRF, are more fully explored in the final chapter, which presents information and discusses the implications for policy, legislation and/or management systems and addresses TOR 5: “to describe the most important areas of conflict or mutual interest between the sport and commercial sectors and identify possible management action associated to these”. Management options are considered at a pan-European level, describing the problem and possible solutions, without considering the differing legal and management structures existing in each Member State. For this reason alone, we conclude that though some solutions may be possible through European legislation, they are most likely to be achieved through subsidiarity in the short to medium term. 4 EC Directorate-General for Fisheries Sport Fishing C2362 Unit FISH-1 Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Outline and objectives of study. Managers of marine fisheries in European Community waters have paid little attention to the impacts or requirements of recreational fisheries, though recreational fishing constitutes a considerable social and economic activity. Total expenditure on recreational fishing across Europe is believed to exceed €25 billion a year (Dillon, 2004). By comparison, the 1998 value of commercial landings in the 15 EU member states was estimated at €20 billion (Megapesca, no date given). In its report on the problems encountered by inshore fishermen (A6- 0141/2006), the European Parliament’s Committee on Fisheries noted that there is increasing tension between inshore fishermen, who fish for a livelihood, and recreational fisheries that are competing in the same physical space
Recommended publications
  • Fisheries Bill Explanatory Notes
    FISHERIES BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES What these notes do These Explanatory Notes relate to the Fisheries Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 25 October 2018 (Bill 278). • These Explanatory Notes have been prepared by the Department for Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs in order to assist the reader of the Bill and to help inform debate on it. They do not form part of the Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament. • These Explanatory Notes explain what each part of the Bill will mean in practice; provide background information on the development of policy; and provide additional information on how the Bill will affect existing legislation in this area. • These Explanatory Notes might best be read alongside the Bill. They are not, and are not intended to be, a comprehensive description of the Bill. Bill 278–EN 57/1 Table of Contents Subject Page of these Notes Overview of the Bill 4 Policy background 6 Exiting the EU 6 The Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) 6 Access 6 The management of fishing opportunities 7 Coastal State negotiations 7 December Fisheries Council 7 National quotas 7 Management regime 7 European Maritime Fisheries Fund 8 Fisheries management in the UK 8 Quota distribution 8 Producer Organisations 8 Fisheries Management in England 9 Devolution 9 Sustainable fisheries for future generations 9 Legal background 9 Legal background to the Common Fisheries Policy 9 London Fisheries Convention 10 UK law relating to fisheries 11 Legal background to the devolution of fisheries 12 International law: the United Nations Convention
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees
    PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Public Bill Committee FISHERIES BILL [LORDS] First Sitting Tuesday 8 September 2020 (Morning) CONTENTS Programme motion agreed to. CLAUSE 1 agreed to, with an amendment. Adjourned till this day at Two o’clock. PBC (Bill 153) 2019 - 2021 No proofs can be supplied. Corrections that Members suggest for the final version of the report should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor’s Room, House of Commons, not later than Saturday 12 September 2020 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2020 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1 Public Bill Committee 8 SEPTEMBER 2020 Fisheries Bill [Lords] 2 The Committee consisted of the following Members: Chairs: †STEVE MCCABE,SIR CHARLES WALKER † Bonnar, Steven (Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) † O’Hara, Brendan (Argyll and Bute) (SNP) (SNP) † Owatemi, Taiwo (Coventry North West) (Lab) † Bowie, Andrew (West Aberdeenshire and † Peacock, Stephanie (Barnsley East) (Lab) Kincardine) (Con) † Pollard, Luke (Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport) † Butler, Rob (Aylesbury) (Con) (Lab/Co-op) † Coutinho, Claire (East Surrey) (Con) † Prentis, Victoria (Parliamentary Under-Secretary of † Duffield, Rosie (Canterbury) (Lab) State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) † Smith, Cat (Lancaster and Fleetwood) (Lab) † Fletcher, Katherine (South Ribble) (Con) † Wild, James (North West
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Exploitation of the Mussel, Mytilus Edulis, in Scotland
    Review of the Exploitation of the Mussel, Myti/us edulis, in Scotland David W McKay and Sarah L Fowler No68 Review of the Exploitation of the Mussel, Mytilus edulis, in Scotland David W McKay and Sarah L Fowler 1997 The Nature Conservation Bureau Ltd 36 Kingfisher Court, Hambridge Road, Newbury, Berkshire RG14 5SJ Nominated Officer: K Duncan, Aquatic Environment Branch Report date: 1996 Report to: Scottish Natural Heritage Contract No: RASD/026/195 AEB This report should be cited as follows: McKay, D.W. and Fowler, S.L. 1997. Review of the Exploitation of the Mussel, Myti/us edulis, in Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage Revjew. No 68 Scottish Natural Heritage Scottish Natural Heritage Publications Section Research and Advisory Services Directorate Battleby, Redgorton, Perth PH1 3EW 2 Anderson Place, Edinburgh EH6 5NP UNITED KINGDOM UNITED KINGDOM ISSN 1350-3111 Review ofthe Exploitation ofthe Mussel, Mvtilus edulis in Scotland Contents 1. Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 2 3. Methods ................................................................................................................................................ 3 3 .1. Questionnaire survey ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Bill [Hl] Explanatory Notes
    FISHERIES BILL [HL] EXPLANATORY NOTES What these notes do These Explanatory Notes relate to the Fisheries Bill [HL] as introduced in the House of Lords on 29 January 2020 (HL Bill 71). • These Explanatory Notes have been prepared by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs in order to assist the reader of the Bill and to help inform debate on it. They do not form part of the Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament. • These Explanatory Notes explain what each part of the Bill will mean in practice; provide background information on the development of policy; and provide additional information on how the Bill will affect existing legislation in this area. • These Explanatory Notes might best be read alongside the Bill. They are not, and are not intended to be, a comprehensive description of the Bill. HL Bill 71–EN 58/1 Table of Contents Subject Page of these Notes Overview of the Bill 4 Policy background 6 Exiting the EU 6 The Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) 6 Access 6 The management of fishing opportunities 6 Coastal State negotiations 7 December Fisheries Council 7 National quotas 7 Management regime 7 European Maritime and Fisheries Fund 8 Fisheries management in the UK 8 Quota distribution 8 Producer Organisations 8 Fisheries Management in England 8 Devolution 9 Sustainable fisheries for future generations 9 Legal background 9 Legal background to the Common Fisheries Policy 9 London Fisheries Convention 10 UK law relating to fisheries 11 Legal background to the devolution of fisheries 12 International law: the United
    [Show full text]
  • Fourteenth Report: Draft Statute Law Repeals Bill
    The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 211) (SCOT. LAW COM. No. 140) STATUTE LAW REVISION: FOURTEENTH REPORT DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL Presented to Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor and the Lord Advocate by Command of Her Majesty April 1993 LONDON: HMSO E17.85 net Cm 2176 The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission were set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the Law. The Law Commissioners are- The Honourable Mr. Justice Brooke, Chairman Mr Trevor M. Aldridge, Q.C. Mr Jack Beatson Mr Richard Buxton, Q.C. Professor Brenda Hoggett, Q.C. The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Collon. Its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WClN 2BQ. The Scottish Law Commissioners are- The Honourable Lord Davidson, Chairman .. Dr E.M. Clive Professor P.N. Love, C.B.E. Sheriff I.D.Macphail, Q.C. Mr W.A. Nimmo Smith, Q.C. The Secretary of the Scottish Law Commission is Mr K.F. Barclay. Its offices are at 140 Causewayside, Edinburgh EH9 1PR. .. 11 THE LAW COMMISSION AND THE SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION STATUTE LAW REVISION: FOURTEENTH REPORT Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill To the Right Honourable the Lord Mackay of Clashfern, Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain, and the Right Honourable the Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Q.C., Her Majesty's Advocate. In pursuance of section 3(l)(d) of the Law Commissions Act 1965, we have prepared the draft Bill which is Appendix 1 and recommend that effect be given to the proposals contained in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Instrument Practice
    Statutory Instrument Practice A guide to help you prepare and publish Statutory Instruments and understand the Parliamentary procedures relating to them - 5th edition (November 2017) Statutory Instrument Practice Page i Statutory Instrument Practice is published by The National Archives © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to: [email protected]. Statutory Instrument Practice Page ii Preface This is the fifth edition of Statutory Instrument Practice (SIP) and replaces the edition published in November 2006. This edition has been prepared by the Legislation Services team at The National Archives. We will contact you regularly to make sure that this guide continues to meet your needs, and remains accurate. If you would like to suggest additional changes to us, please email them to the SI Registrar. Thank you to all of the contributors who helped us to update this edition. You can download SIP from: https://publishing.legislation.gov.uk/tools/uksi/si-drafting/si- practice. November 2017 Statutory Instrument Practice Page iii Contents PREFACE ............................................................................................................................. 3 CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................... 4 PART 1: INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Provide That the Fishery Limits Act 1976
    Fishery Limits (United Kingdom) Amendment Bill 1 A BILL TO Provide that the Fishery Limits Act 1976 shall have effect regardless of the provisions of the European Communities Act 1972; that Part II of the Merchant Shipping Act 1988 shall have effect as though it had not been repealed by the Merchant Shipping (Registration etc) Act 1993; to confer upon the Secretary of State powers to license fishing vessels to fish within United Kingdom waters; to exclude vessels of specified nations or specified vessels from fishing United Kingdom waters; to negotiate common policies with other countries to preserve fish stocks; to invalidate any provisions of the Common Fisheries Policy of the European Community; and for connected purposes. E IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present BParliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— 1 Effect on Common Fisheries Policy (1) At the date on which this Act comes into force (the “commencement date”) the United Kingdom shall withdraw from the Common Fisheries Policy of the European Union. (2) The Fishery Limits Act 1976 (c. 86) shall have effect from the commencement 5 date regardless of any provision of community law to the contrary and notwithstanding the provisions of the European Communities Act 1972 (c. 68). 2 Amendment of the Fishery Limits Act 1976 (1) The Fishery Limits Act 1976 is amended as follows. (2) In section 2 (access to British fisheries), for subsection (2) there is substituted— 10 “(2) A foreign fishing boat not registered in a country for the time being designated under subsection (1) shall not enter British fishery limits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ownership of Inshore Fisheries in Scotland
    The ownership of inshore fisheries in Scotland: an opportunity for community ownership? Sir Crispin Agnew of Lochnaw Bt QC, Westwater Advocates Thomas Appleby University of the West of England Emma BeannUniversity of the West of England Acknowledgements: the research underpinning this article is part funded by the Sustainable Inshore Fisheries Trust (a Scottish charity founded to promote the sustainable management of Scotland’s inshore waters in order to achieve the maximum long-term socio-economic benefits for Scotland’s coastal communities) and, through the International Water Security Network, by the Lloyd’s Register Foundation (a charitable foundation helping to protect life and property by supporting engineering- related education, public engagement and the application of research). <ABSTRACT> The Scottish Government has pledged to reform inshore fisheries by 2020, while the UK Government is in the process of reforming fisheries legislation with the Fisheries Bill, brought forward in anticipation of the departure of the UK from the EU. As the necessary starting point for any regulatory reform is an understanding of the existing rights subject to regulation, this article investigates the nature of the existing rights to fish in inshore Scottish waters and assesses whether reform of the ownership of Scotland’s fishery needs to be assessed at the same time as its regulation. The article considers the theory behind Scotland’s fishing rights, the extent of the right to fish, the Crown’s right to alienation and the statutory impacts on
    [Show full text]
  • Scrutiny of Bills: Final Progress Report
    House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights Scrutiny of Bills: Final Progress Report Seventeenth Report of Session 2002–03 Drawing special attention to: Hunting Bill European Parliamentary and Local Elections (Pilots) Bill Company Directors’ Performance and Compensation Bill Consumer Protection (Unsolicited E-mails) Bill Corporate Responsibility Bill Fishery Limits (United Kingdom) Amendment Bill Medical Practitioners & Dentists (Professional Negligence Insurance) Bill Street Furniture (Graffiti) Bill HL Paper 186 HC 1278 House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights Scrutiny of Bills: Final Progress Report Seventeenth Report of Session 2002–03 Report, together with formal minutes and appendices Ordered by The House of Lords to be printed 17 November 2003 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 17 November 2003 HL Paper 186 HC 1278 Published on 24 November 2003 by authority of the House of Lords and the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 JOINT COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS The Joint Committee on Human Rights is appointed by the House of Lords and the House of Commons to consider matters relating to human rights in the United Kingdom (but excluding consideration of individual cases); proposals for remedial orders, draft remedial orders and remedial orders. The Joint Committee has a maximum of six Members appointed by each House, of whom the quorum for any formal proceedings is two from each House. Current Membership HOUSE OF LORDS HOUSE OF COMMONS Lord Bowness Mr David Chidgey
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Bill [HL]
    Fisheries Bill [HL] EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, have been ordered to be published as HL Bill 71—EN. EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Lord Gardiner of Kimble has made the following statement under section 19(1)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1998: In my view the provisions of the Fisheries Bill [HL] are compatible with the Convention rights. HL Bill 71 58/1 Fisheries Bill [HL] CONTENTS Fisheries objectives, fisheries statements and fisheries management plans 1 Fisheries objectives 2 Joint fisheries statement 3 Joint fisheries statement: procedure 4 Secretary of State fisheries statement 5 Secretary of State fisheries statement: procedure 6 Fisheries management plans: duty to comply with proposals in JFS 7 Fisheries management plans: power to depart from proposals in JFS 8 Fisheries management plans: procedure 9 Fisheries management plans: transitional provision 10 Effect of fisheries statements and fisheries management plans 11 Reports on fisheries statements and fisheries management plans Access to British fisheries and regulation of foreign fishing boats 12 Access to British fisheries by foreign fishing boats 13 Regulation of foreign fishing boats Licensing of fishing boats 14 British fishing boats required to be licensed 15 Power to grant licences in respect of British fishing boats 16 Foreign fishing boats required to be licensed if within British fishery limits 17 Power to grant licences in respect of foreign fishing boats 18 Further provision
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Fisheries Act 1968
    Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Sea Fisheries Act 1968. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes Sea Fisheries Act 1968 1968 CHAPTER 77 An Act to make further provision with respect to the subsidies payable to, and the levies which may be imposed on, the white fish and herring industries, to make further provision for the regulation of sea fishing, to amend the Sea Fisheries (Shell fish) Act 1967 and the Sea Fish (Conservation) Act 1967, to make provision with respect to fishing boats and gear lost or abandoned at sea, to remove anomalies in certain enactments relating to sea fisheries and the white fish and herring industries and to repeal other such enactments which are obsolete or unnecessary; and for connected purposes. [18th December 1968] Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act extended by S.I. 1988/1926, reg. 32 C2 By Criminal Justice Act 1991 (c. 53, SIF 39:1), s. 101(1), Sch. 12 para.23; S.I. 1991/2208, art. 2(1), Sch.1 it is provided (14.10.1991) that in relation to any time before the commencement of s. 70 of that 1991 Act (which came into force on 1.10.1992 by S.I. 1992/333, art. 2(2), Sch. 2) references in any enactment amended by that 1991 Act, to youth courts shall be construed as references to juvenile courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Statute Law Revision: Sixteenth Report Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill
    LAW COMMISSION SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION STATUTE LAW REVISION: SIXTEENTH REPORT DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL CONTENTS Paragraph Page REPORT 1 APPENDIX 1: DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL 2 APPENDIX 2: EXPLANATORY NOTE ON THE DRAFT BILL 46 Clauses 1 – 3 46 Schedule 1: Repeals 47 PART I: Administration of Justice 47 Group 1 - Sheriffs 1.1 47 Group 2 - General Repeals 1.4 48 PART II: Ecclesiastical Law 51 Group 1 - Ecclesiastical Leases 2.1 51 Group 2 - Tithe Acts 2.6 53 PART III: Education 57 Group 1 - Public Schools 3.1 57 Group 2 - Universities 3.2 57 PART IV: Finance 60 Group 1 - Colonial Stock 4.1 60 Group 2 - Land Commission 4.4 60 Group 3 - Development of Tourism 4.6 61 Group 4 - Loan Societies 4.7 62 Group 5 - General Repeals 4.9 62 PART V: Hereford and Worcester 65 Statutory Undertaking Provisions 5.8 68 Protective Provisions 5.15 71 Bridges 5.16 72 Miscellaneous Provisions 5.24 75 PART VI: Inclosure Acts 77 iii Paragraph Page PART VII: Scottish Local Acts 83 Group 1 - Aid to the Poor, Charities and Private Pensions 7.7 84 Group 2 - Dog Wardens 7.9 85 Group 3 - Education 7.12 86 Group 4 - Insurance Companies 7.13 86 Group 5 - Local Authority Finance 7.14 87 Group 6 - Order Confirmation Acts 7.19 89 Group 7 - Oyster and Mussel Fisheries 7.22 90 Group 8 - Other Repeals 7.23 90 PART VIII: Slave Trade Acts 92 PART IX: Statutes 102 Group 1 - Statute Law Revision Acts 9.1 102 Group 2 - Statute Law (Repeals) Acts 9.6 103 PART X: Miscellaneous 106 Group 1 - Stannaries 10.1 106 Group 2 - Sea Fish 10.3 106 Group 3 - Sewers Support 10.4 107 Group 4 - Agricultural Research 10.5 108 Group 5 - General Repeals 10.6 108 Schedule 2: Consequential and connected provisions 115 APPENDIX 3: CONSULTEES ON REPEAL OF LEGISLATION 117 PROPOSED IN SCHEDULE 1, PART V iv THE LAW COMMISSION AND THE SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION STATUTE LAW REVISION: SIXTEENTH REPORT Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill To the Right Honourable the Lord Irvine of Lairg, Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain, and the Right Honourable the Lord Hardie, QC, Her Majesty’s Advocate 1.
    [Show full text]