DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Report «Surgutneftegas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Report «Surgutneftegas ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT Contents MESSAGE FROM ANATOLY S. NURYAEV, FIRST DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL OF “SURGUTNEFTEGAS” PJSC Protection and rational use KEY AREAS of water resources 24 OF THE COMPANY'S ENVIRONMENTAL Waste management 26 ACTIVITY Protection and rational use of land 30 Forest protection 34 01 Indicators PJSC “Surgutneftegas” The Ecology national project of an environmental impact 35 and key areas of the Company's environmental activity 6 In-house environmental monitoring 38 Key areas of the Ecology program 7 Biodiversity conservation and support of specially protected The Company's readiness to adopt natural reservations the best available technologies 9 and other territories with special mode of management 40 Interaction with the small-numbered ENVIRONMENTAL indigenous peoples of the North 44 SAFETY R&D activities in the field of environmental protection 45 Industrial environmental control 46 02 The “green office” principles 47 Accident risk mitigation measures 12 Environmental education and professional training Receipt inspection of pipe products 13 of employees 48 Field pipeline corrosion monitoring Cooperation with public organizations and diagnostics 14 and media 50 Pipeline inhibitor protection 15 Use of pipe products BASIC STRATEGIC with an internal coating 16 DOCUMENTS IN THE FIELD Dehydration of oil 17 OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITY 04 Environmental policy 54 The Company's responsibilities 55 Policy on interaction 03 with the small-numbered indigenous Air protection 20 peoples of the North 56 ANATOLY S. NURYAEV First Deputy Director General “Surgutneftegas” PJSC Environmental report 2018 Environmental 2 For the period from 2018 to 2024, at resource saving and energy efficiency. the Ecology national project has become For the last five years, “Surgutneftegas” PJSC one of the priority development vectors for investments in environmental activity the Russian Federation. Its objectives and aims exceeded RUB 92 billion. align with the regulations of the Environmental The Company understands policy of “Surgutneftegas” PJSC. For almost the importance of maintaining balance, 30 years, the Company has successfully been providing not only an economic performance implementing the comprehensive measures of “Surgutneftegas” PJSC operations, but also of the Ecology corporate program, closely the reliability and environmental friendliness PJSC “Surgutneftegas” following the requirements of environmental of all production processes as well as legislation. the social responsibility of the business. “Surgutneftegas” PJSC is the all-time The Company develops an effective leader of Russian fuel and energy complex collaboration with various public institutions. in terms of utilization of associated petroleum Thanks to our combined efforts a solid gas. As far back as ten years ago, the Company foundation is laid for the further sustainable reached the level of 95% in terms of efficient development of Surgutneftegas and utilization of associated petroleum gas. territories of the Company’s operations. Since 2012 to the present day, Surgutneftegas The Company is engaged in has been holding the record in the sector – a constructive dialog with the indigenous more than 99%. people representing the small-numbered The Company ensures environmental peoples of the North, who revere customs safety of field pipelines: for the fifth year, it has and the way of life of their ancestors, been operating its own in-house specialized engaging in deer herding and other enterprise for application of an internal traditional industries. Surgutneftegas cares polymer coating on pipes and pipeline about biodiversity conservation, performs fittings. At the end of 2024, the Company an extensive work to artificially restore will use only pipelines with an internal anti- aquatic biological resources and forests. corrosion coating. The Company shows a high level The Company continues to develop and of information transparency in the issues move forward: it tests and implements the best of environmental responsibility. available technologies, new machinery, “Surgutneftegas” PJSC uses resources equipment, improves the competences in the most efficient way, minimizes its of its personnel. In all areas of its operations environmental impact in order to preserve the Company steadily mitigates a negative the unique natural heritage of Russia for environmental impact of production aiming future generations. 3 01 Key areas of the Company's environmental activity The Ecology national project and key areas of the Company’s environmental activity Throughout the entire territory of Russia we must ensure the highest standards of ecological well-being. Vladimir V. Putin, President of the Russian Federation The Ecology national project is management”, “Infrastructure for especially implemented pursuant to Decree of hazardous waste management (hazard the President of the Russian Federation, classes I-II)”, “Biodiversity conservation and Vladimir Putin, dated 7 May 2018 ecological tourism development”, etc. “On the national goals and strategic tasks of “Surgutneftegas” PJSC pays close the development of the Russian Federation attention to the issues of environmental for the period up to 2024”. The project covers protection. The implementation of 11 areas, including “Clean country”, “Fresh the Ecology corporate program provides air”, “Clean water”, “Forests preservation”, resource saving and a consistent reduction of “Integrated system for municipal waste the environmental impact of production. Environmental report 2018 Environmental 6 Key areas of the Ecology program: construction of environmental facilities, 6 centers for oily soil decontamination; including air protection facilities, waste decontamination and utilization facilities; 3 centers for sludge decontamination with sludge storage ponds, units for oily air protection; fluid recovery and Heater-Treater three- phase separators; protection and rational use of water resources; 5 mobile units for tank cleaning and initial oil sludge treatment, including three- industrial waste decontamination and phase centrifuges; utilization; 33 single- and multiple- cell sludge PJSC “Surgutneftegas” protection and rational use of land; storage ponds with a total capacity of 81 thousand cubic meters; monitoring of environmental components and control of production 10 units for thermal oil sludge facilities operation; decontamination with a total capacity of 70 thousand cubic meters per year; ensuring environmental safety of oil production facilities, including 5 landfills for disposal of solid household pipelines; and industrial wastes designed to dispose of production and consumption environmental training and education of waste with a total capacity of the personnel; 1,671 thousand cubic meters; implementation of the “green office” 21 Forsazh mobile units for thermal principles in each administrative building decontamination of solid oily waste with of “Surgutneftegas” PJSC; a total capacity of 15.75 thousand tonnes per year; biodiversity conservation in the areas of the Company’s operations; units for shredding waste paper and non-returnable plastic containers with R&D activities in the field of a capacity of 1,150 kilograms per hour environmental protection. and 50 kilograms per hour respectively; The Company annually increases a tire recycling plant for recycling worn- its production resource saving capacity, out tires and inner tubes with a capacity and owns a vast fleet of machinery and of 5 thousand tonnes per year; equipment, including: a workshop for application of an anti- gas processing plant; corrosion coating on pipes and pipeline fittings with a capacity of 720 kilometers 23 gas turbine power plants and 7 gas of pipes and 15 thousand fittings per year. reciprocating engine power plants (GTPP, GREPP); A high level of environmental safety of “Surgutneftegas” PJSC production across 31 compressor stations; the whole territory of the Company’s operations, including new regions of operations is ensured 2 gas processing units for utilization of by a sustainable financing of environmental associated petroleum gas (APG); protection measures. The annual costs of the Company for 112 initial water separation units (IWSUs); environmental protection are made up of 7 a number of different expenses, including wastewater utilization, waste management, those of repairing and replacing pipelines, land reclamation, environmental monitoring protecting oilfield equipment and facilities and R&D activities. In the reporting year, from corrosion, preventing equipment failures the costs reached RUB 17.4 billion. In 2019, and oil contamination, and elimination of the costs are planned to be increased by their consequences, air protection, industrial RUB 0.5 billion. INVESTMENTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES BY “SURGUTNEFTEGAS” PJSC FOR 2014-2019, RUB MN 2019 Measures 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 (as planned) Construction of 4,100.43 5,078.51 4,010.00 4,566.71 2,382.55 2,536.36 environmental facilities Pipeline accident prevention 4,981.09 4,306.14 5,193.77 5,078.22 4,814.70 4,925.87 Industrial wastes and wastewater utilization and 7,333.30 6,457.79 6,370.34 9,330.36 8,493.88 8,007.65 decontamination Prevention and elimination of oil contamination 1,487.13 1,293.76 1,183.44 1,083.96 750.93 898.54 consequences, reconstruction of production facilities Sludge pits reclamation 360.15 398.90 487.86 441.17 396.14 792.97 Monitoring 131.64 143.19 189.03 249.93 268.64 287.46 Air protection 90.98 104.37 98.42 92.73 105.99 95.31
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russia's Oil&Gas Development and Exports Trends Oil Industry Gas
    Eleventh Japan–Russia Energy and Environment Dialogue in Niigata R1-GROMOV Russia’s Oil&Gas Development and Exports Trends Alexey GROMOV, PhD, Principal Director on Energy Studies Institute for Energy and Finance The Eleventh Japan-Russia Energy and Environment Dialogue (JREED) Niigata, Japan 30th January 2019 1 Oil Industry Global oil market context Russian oil production and export trends up to 2023 2 Gas Industry EU Gas market trends Russian gas production and export trends up to 2023 1 ©ERINA Eleventh Japan–Russia Energy and Environment Dialogue in Niigata R1-GROMOV OPEC+ Agreement has a crucial role to stabilize the global oil market 90 $/bbl Brent WTI 80 70 60 OPEC+ Agreement Update 50 (June 2018) OPEC+ Agreement 40 Update (December 2018) OPEC+ OECD commercial Agreement stocks reduction 30 Decrease (December during 2015 2016) 20 01/15 03/15 05/15 07/15 09/15 11/15 01/16 03/16 05/16 07/16 09/16 11/16 01/17 03/17 05/17 07/17 09/17 11/17 01/18 03/18 05/18 07/18 09/18 11/18 • OPEC+ Agreement (December 2016) to cut collective oil production of 1,8 MMb/d supported global oil prices and reduced price volatility in 1Q2017- 1Q2018. • The threat of US sanctions against Iranian oil exports led to OPEC+ Agreement Update in June 2018 (increase collective oil production of 1 MMb/d). • New OPEC+ Agreement Update (December 2018) to cut collective oil production of 1,2 MMb/d has to reduce the oil market volatility in 2019 2 OPEC+ Agreement Update in December 2018 lead to gradually balancing the global oil market in 2019 Changes in global liquid fuels market balance Mbd 2.0 1.6 1.2 -0,4 -0,4 0.8 -0,8 0,75 0.4 0,7 +0,2 +0,2 +0,4 0,4 0,35 +0,4 -0,1 0,1 0.0 -0,2 +0,3 +1,2 -0,1 +0,3 -0,5 +0,3 -0.4 +0,2 -0,0 +0,2 Доп.
    [Show full text]
  • Negativliste. Fossil Energi
    Bilag 6. Negativliste. Fossil energi Maj 2017 Læsevejledning til negativlisten: Moderselskab / øverste ejer vises med fed skrift til venstre. Med almindelig tekst, indrykket, er de underliggende selskaber, der udsteder aktier og erhvervsobligationer. Det er de underliggende, udstedende selskaber, der er omfattet af negativlisten. Rækkeetiketter Acergy SA SUBSEA 7 Inc Subsea 7 SA Adani Enterprises Ltd Adani Enterprises Ltd Adani Power Ltd Adani Power Ltd Adaro Energy Tbk PT Adaro Energy Tbk PT Adaro Indonesia PT Alam Tri Abadi PT Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd Africa Oil Corp Africa Oil Corp Alpha Natural Resources Inc Alex Energy Inc Alliance Coal Corp Alpha Appalachia Holdings Inc Alpha Appalachia Services Inc Alpha Natural Resource Inc/Old Alpha Natural Resources Inc Alpha Natural Resources LLC Alpha Natural Resources LLC / Alpha Natural Resources Capital Corp Alpha NR Holding Inc Aracoma Coal Co Inc AT Massey Coal Co Inc Bandmill Coal Corp Bandytown Coal Co Belfry Coal Corp Belle Coal Co Inc Ben Creek Coal Co Big Bear Mining Co Big Laurel Mining Corp Black King Mine Development Co Black Mountain Resources LLC Bluff Spur Coal Corp Boone Energy Co Bull Mountain Mining Corp Central Penn Energy Co Inc Central West Virginia Energy Co Clear Fork Coal Co CoalSolv LLC Cobra Natural Resources LLC Crystal Fuels Co Cumberland Resources Corp Dehue Coal Co Delbarton Mining Co Douglas Pocahontas Coal Corp Duchess Coal Co Duncan Fork Coal Co Eagle Energy Inc/US Elk Run Coal Co Inc Exeter Coal Corp Foglesong Energy Co Foundation Coal
    [Show full text]
  • Morning Headlines
    MORNING HEADLINES RUSSIAN CAPITAL MARKETS FRIDAY, MARCH 05, 2004 Sales/TradingLondon (+44 020) 7439 6881 Moscow (+7 095) 995 2400 MARKET NEWS COMMENT Surgutneftegas minori Market: Continue to see support in Gazprom, LUKoil and the cells. PM ties attempt to cancel ratified today.RTS closed Thursday at 669.26 up 0.3% or 1.99 points from the previous close. Trading volume Thursday fell to U.S. $45.5 million from U.S. $54.2 million Wednesday. The MICEX closed Thursday at Sibneft charged with 582.11, up 0.1% from the previous close. Trading volume on the MICEX $420 mn more in back was down to $582.1 million from $660.0 million on Wednesday. taxes LUKoil JV to tap Saudi natural gas field EVENTS Russia’s cellular sub TO WATCH Mar 11 Golden Telecom 2003 US GAAP results scriber base up 5% in Mar 14 Russia's presidential election scheduled February to 39.9 million Mar 20 SurgutNG AGM Mar 26 Results of March 14 presidential elections to be an URSI: new licenses for nounced Mar 28 Sibneft EGM and 2003 GAAP results Ekaterinburg, Sverd Yukos 2003 operating results Apr 1 Russia’s oil export duty set at $35.2 per tonne lovsk region; plans con Apr 6 Sibneft’s EMG expected to be held solidation Apr 15 NW Tel to consider merger with Lensvyaz and Komi's Svyaz RUSSIAN ADRs, LONDON INDICATORS Changes Changes Price Vol 1 day 1 mo YTD Value 1 day 1 mo YTD $ $ mn % % % $ % % % Gazprom 34.2 28.2 3.0 14.8 31.9 Urals, bbl 30.7 0.7 15.1 6.5 Lukoil 116.1 79.1 1.7 15.0 24.7 Nickel, t 13150.0 5.6 12.3 20.6 Surgut 31.7 6.2 1.6 12.2 7.8 Eurobond Rus10 112.5 0.1 5.8 7.3
    [Show full text]
  • Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas
    Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas Total score ACT rating Ranking out of 100 performance, narrative and trend 1 Neste 57.4 / 100 8.1 / 20 B 2 Engie 56.9 / 100 7.9 / 20 B 3 Naturgy Energy 44.8 / 100 6.8 / 20 C 4 Eni 43.6 / 100 7.3 / 20 C 5 bp 42.9 / 100 6.0 / 20 C 6 Total 40.7 / 100 6.1 / 20 C 7 Repsol 38.1 / 100 5.0 / 20 C 8 Equinor 37.9 / 100 4.9 / 20 C 9 Galp Energia 36.4 / 100 4.3 / 20 C 10 Royal Dutch Shell 34.3 / 100 3.4 / 20 C 11 ENEOS Holdings 32.4 / 100 2.6 / 20 C 12 Origin Energy 29.3 / 100 7.3 / 20 D 13 Marathon Petroleum Corporation 24.8 / 100 4.4 / 20 D 14 BHP Group 22.1 / 100 4.3 / 20 D 15 Hellenic Petroleum 20.7 / 100 3.7 / 20 D 15 OMV 20.7 / 100 3.7 / 20 D Total score ACT rating Ranking out of 100 performance, narrative and trend 17 MOL Magyar Olajes Gazipari Nyrt 20.2 / 100 2.5 / 20 D 18 Ampol Limited 18.8 / 100 0.9 / 20 D 19 SK Innovation 18.6 / 100 2.8 / 20 D 19 YPF 18.6 / 100 2.8 / 20 D 21 Compania Espanola de Petroleos SAU (CEPSA) 17.9 / 100 2.5 / 20 D 22 CPC Corporation, Taiwan 17.6 / 100 2.4 / 20 D 23 Ecopetrol 17.4 / 100 2.3 / 20 D 24 Formosa Petrochemical Corp 17.1 / 100 2.2 / 20 D 24 Cosmo Energy Holdings 17.1 / 100 2.2 / 20 D 26 California Resources Corporation 16.9 / 100 2.1 / 20 D 26 Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen (PKN Orlen) 16.9 / 100 2.1 / 20 D 28 Reliance Industries 16.7 / 100 1.0 / 20 D 29 Bharat Petroleum Corporation 16.0 / 100 1.7 / 20 D 30 Santos 15.7 / 100 1.6 / 20 D 30 Inpex 15.7 / 100 1.6 / 20 D 32 Saras 15.2 / 100 1.4 / 20 D 33 Qatar Petroleum 14.5 / 100 1.1 / 20 D 34 Varo Energy 12.4 / 100
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution in the Russian Gas Market – the Competition for Customers
    Evolution in the Russian Gas Market – The Competition for Customers James Henderson NG 73 January 2013 The contents of this paper are the author’s sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, of any of the Institute’s members, and/or of the author’s other affiliations. Copyright © 2013 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-907555-66-4 ii Abbreviations and Units of Measurement bbls Barrels bcm Billion cubic metres bcma Billion cubic metres per annum bn bbls Billion barrels boepd Barrels of oil equivalent per day bpd Barrels per day E&P Exploration and Production ESPO East Siberia – Pacific Ocean (Pipeline) FSU Former Soviet Union IOC International Oil Company kboepd Thousands of barrels of oil equivalent per day kbpd Thousands of barrels per day km Kilometres mm bbls Million barrels mcm Thousands of cubic metres mmboepd Millions of barrels of oil equivalent per day] mmbpd Millions of barrels per day mmbtu Million British thermal units mmcm Millions of cubic metres mmt Millions of tonnes mmtpa Millions of tonnes per annum Mm tonnes Millions of tonnes P&P Proved and Probable tcm
    [Show full text]
  • US Sanctions on Russia
    U.S. Sanctions on Russia Updated January 17, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45415 SUMMARY R45415 U.S. Sanctions on Russia January 17, 2020 Sanctions are a central element of U.S. policy to counter and deter malign Russian behavior. The United States has imposed sanctions on Russia mainly in response to Russia’s 2014 invasion of Cory Welt, Coordinator Ukraine, to reverse and deter further Russian aggression in Ukraine, and to deter Russian Specialist in European aggression against other countries. The United States also has imposed sanctions on Russia in Affairs response to (and to deter) election interference and other malicious cyber-enabled activities, human rights abuses, the use of a chemical weapon, weapons proliferation, illicit trade with North Korea, and support to Syria and Venezuela. Most Members of Congress support a robust Kristin Archick Specialist in European use of sanctions amid concerns about Russia’s international behavior and geostrategic intentions. Affairs Sanctions related to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine are based mainly on four executive orders (EOs) that President Obama issued in 2014. That year, Congress also passed and President Rebecca M. Nelson Obama signed into law two acts establishing sanctions in response to Russia’s invasion of Specialist in International Ukraine: the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Trade and Finance Ukraine Act of 2014 (SSIDES; P.L. 113-95/H.R. 4152) and the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 (UFSA; P.L. 113-272/H.R. 5859). Dianne E. Rennack Specialist in Foreign Policy In 2017, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the Countering Russian Influence Legislation in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 (CRIEEA; P.L.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Annual Report
    Online Annual Report Gazprom Neft Performance review Sustainable 2020 at a glance 62 Resource base and production development CONTENTS 81 Refining and manufacturing 4 Geographical footprint 94 Sales of oil and petroleum products 230 Sustainable development 6 Gazprom Neft at a glance 114 Financial performance 234 Health, safety and environment (HSE) 8 Gazprom Neft’s investment case 241 Environmental safety 10 2020 highlights 250 HR Management 12 Letter from the Chairman of the Board of Directors 254 Social policy Technological Strategic report development Appendices 264 Consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended 31 December 2020, with the 16 Letter from the Chairman of the Management Board 122 Innovation management independent auditor’s report About the Report 18 Market overview 131 2020 highlights and key projects 355 Company history This Report by Public Joint Stock Company Gazprom Neft (“Gazprom 28 2020 challenges 135 Import substitution 367 Structure of the Gazprom Neft Group Neft PJSC”, the “company”) for 2020 includes the results of operational activities of Gazprom Neft PJSC and its subsidiaries, 34 2030 Strategy 370 Information on energy consumption at Gazprom collectively referred to as the Gazprom Neft Group (the “Group”). 38 Business model Neft Gazprom Neft PJSC is the parent company of the Group and provides consolidated information on the operational and financial 42 Company transformation 371 Excerpts from management’s discussion and performance of the Group’s key assets for this Annual Report. The analysis of financial condition and results of list of subsidiaries covered in this Report and Gazprom Neft PJSC’s 44 Digital transformation operations interest in their capital are disclosed in notes to the consolidated Governance system IFRS financial statements for 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Determinants for the Future of Russian Oil Production and Exports
    April 2015 Key Determinants for the Future of Russian Oil Production and Exports OIES PAPER: WPM 58 James Henderson* The contents of this paper are the authors’ sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2015 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-78467-027-6 *James Henderson is Senior Research Fellow at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. i April 2015 – Key Determinants for the Future of Russian Oil Production and Exports Acknowledgements I would like to thank my colleagues at the OIES for their help with this research and to those who also assisted by reviewing this paper. In particular I am very grateful for the support and comments provided by Bassam Fattouh, whose contribution was vital to the completion of my analysis. I would also like to thank my editor, Matthew Holland, for his detailed corrections and useful comments. Thanks also to the many industry executives, consultants, and analysts with whom I have discussed this topic, but as always the results of the analysis and any errors remain entirely my responsibility. ii April 2015
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Russian Oil Production in the Short, Medium, and Long Term
    September 2019 The Future of Russian Oil Production in the Short, Medium, and Long Term Introduction This paper has two major goals. The first is to update reports published by the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies in April 2015 and February 2017 which both assessed the short-term outlook for Russian oil production in the light of sanctions and the first OPEC+ agreement which committed Russia to a production cut of 300,000 bpd from January 2017. Both these papers argued that, despite the impact of sanctions on the financing of the Russian oil sector and the availability of international technology in some spheres (most specifically offshore, the Arctic, and shale oil), the immediate impact on Russian oil production would be low due to the number of new projects already under development or close to production. Indeed, it was already clear in February 2017 that the main constraint on Russian oil output in the short-term would be the low oil price and the resulting cooperation between OPEC and non-OPEC producers to constrain production in order to reduce the oversupply of oil in the global market. As will be discussed below, the initial plan for a six-month production cut by the OPEC+ group was ultimately extended to 18 months, and then after only a six-month period of increased output a new agreement was put into place at the start of 2019. As a result, the full potential of Russian production has yet to be proven, with the Russian oil companies remaining frustrated at the necessity of holding back new fields and restraining production at many existing assets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Petroleum Industry: Mergers, Structural Change, and Antitrust
    Federal Trade Commission TIMOTHY J. MURIS Chairman MOZELLE W. THOMPSON Commissioner ORSON SWINDLE Commissioner THOMAS B. LEARY Commissioner PAMELA JONES HARBOUR Commissioner Bureau of Economics Luke M. Froeb Director Mark W. Frankena Deputy Director for Antitrust Paul A. Pautler Deputy Director for Consumer Protection Timothy A. Deyak Associate Director for Competition Analysis Pauline M. Ippolito Associate Director for Special Projects Robert D. Brogan Assistant Director for Antitrust Louis Silvia Assistant Director for Antitrust Michael G. Vita Assistant Director for Antitrust Denis A. Breen Assistant Director for Economic Policy Analysis Gerard R. Butters Assistant Director for Consumer Protection This is a report of the Bureau of Economics of the Federal Trade Commission. The views expressed in this report are those of the staff and do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Trade Commission or any individual Commissioner. The Commission has voted to authorize staff to publish this report. Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the Bureau of Economics under the supervision of David T. Scheffman, former Director; Mary T. Coleman, former Deputy Director and Mark Frankena, Deputy Director; and Louis Silvia, Assistant Director. Bureau economists who researched and drafted this report were Jay Creswell, Jeffrey Fischer, Daniel Gaynor, Geary Gessler, Christopher Taylor, and Charlotte Wojcik. Bureau Research Analysts who worked on this project were Madeleine McChesney, Joseph Remy, Michael Madigan, Paul Golaszewski, Matthew Tschetter, Ryan Toone, Karl Kindler, Steve Touhy, and Louise Sayers. Bureau of Economics staff also acknowledge the review of drafts and many helpful comments and suggestions from members of the staff of the Bureau of Competition, in particular Phillip L.
    [Show full text]
  • Vladimir Leonidovich Bogdanov Date of Birth: 28.05.1951
    Information on the candidates for election to Rosneft Board of Directors 1. Full Name: Vladimir Leonidovich Bogdanov Date of birth: 28.05.1951 Education: higher, Tyumen Industrial Institute, Academy of People’s Economy with the Council of Ministers of the USSR, PhD Econ. Places of employment and positions for the last five years in the chronological order, including part-time jobs: Organization: OJSC Surgutneftegas Period: 1984 to date Title: General Director, Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors Positions held in the governing bodies of other legal entities: Chairman of the Board of Directors of CJSC Surgutneftegasbank, member of the Board of Directors of OJSC Rosneft Oil Company,, LLC National Petroleum Consortium. List of entities to whom the candidate is an affiliate with statement of affiliation grounds: V.L. Bogdanov is an affiliate to OJSC Surgutneftegas as the member of the Board of Directors and authorized sole executive body of OJSC Surgutneftegas, as well as a member of the group of individuals who own OJSC Surgutneftegas; V.L. Bogdanov is affiliated with CJSC Surgutneftegasbank, OJSC Rosneft Oil Company, LLC National Petroleum Consortium, being a member of the Boards of Directors of the said entities. Nature of any relationship to individuals – members of the Company management bodies or bodies of control over the Company financial and economic performance: V.L. Bogdanov is not a relative of the President, members of the Management Board, members of the Board of Directors and members of the Internal Audit Commission of Rosneft. Contact address of the candidate: 628415 Tyumen Region, Surgut, 1 Grigory Kukuevitsky st., bldg.1.
    [Show full text]
  • National Oil Company Efficiency: Theory and Evidence
    RICE UNIVERSITY National Oil Company Efficiency: Theory and Evidence Stacy Eller Peter Hartley Kenneth B Medlock III James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy RICE UNIVERSITY 1 RICE UNIVERSITY Theoretical Model 2 Economic model precepts RICE UNIVERSITY n Intertemporal, optimizing model of a National Oil Company (NOC) n Contrast a NOC to a shareholder­owned firm n Capture systematic effects from the NOC institutional arrangement n Weaker monitoring of a NOC and differing political goals imply that in addition to commercial returns NOC management choices will reflect: u Increased employment in the firm of labor or other domestic inputs u Domestic consumer surplus from oil product sales u Pressure to increase current relative to future revenue – a high discount rate n Without these concerns, the NOC optimization problem approaches that of a private monopoly firm n In the efficient case: u Domestic oil consumers are neither taxed nor subsidized relative to other constituents, and u Domestic consumer surplus is weighed identically to NOC profits 3 NOC versus efficient case: output, inputs, cash flow RICE n Output shifted forward, lower reserves & cash flow, higher employment UNIVERSITY Output Reserves 0.40 1.20 NOC output NOC reserves 0.35 Efficient output Efficient reserves 1.00 0.30 0.80 0.25 0.20 0.60 0.15 0.40 0.10 0.20 0.05 0.00 0.00 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Years Years Employment Cash Flow 4.00 0.25 NOC employment NOC cash flow 3.50 0.20 Efficient cash Efficient employment flow 3.00 0.15 2.50 0.10 2.00 0.05 1.50 0.00
    [Show full text]