DOCSLIB.ORG

Civil Rights & Restorative Justice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CIVIL RIGHTS & RESTORATIVE JUSTICE CIVIL RIGHTS AND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROJECT NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW YEAR END REPORT 2014 CIVIL RIGHTS & RESTORATIVE JUSTICE CIVIL RIGHTS AND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PROJECT Northeastern University School of Law he Civil Rights and Restorative Jus- Center, and we implemented a pilot pro- Ttice Project at Northeastern Univer- gram for high school students. sity School of Law brings together law- CRRJ brought to national prominence makers, lawyers, activists, researchers, two cases, achieving a measure of restor- journalists and the families of victims ative justice for cases from the era of his- of racial homicides to study and redress tory in which we work. George Stinney, a the systemic failures of the criminal jus- 14 year- old executed in 1944 for the mur- tice system of the mid-twentieth century. ders of two young girls based solely on his Working closely with our research partner unrecorded, unsigned “confession”, was at MIT to build a database of racial homi- exonerated by a South Carolina court. The cides from the Jim Crow era, we engage court adopted the position in our amicus in a form of legal archeology: recovering brief that this was an historical wrong that documents lost to history, examining the needed to be corrected. fault lines of each case, and conceptual- izing continuities over time. Our students In Atlanta, in 1947, two WWII veterans interview witnesses and family members, were murdered on streetcars by armed document their memories, and share of- motormen, a story that had been forgot- ficial accounts of the events. CRRJ main- ten. With the reopening of the Atlanta tains the most comprehensive archive on streetcars this year as a touristic run be- racial homicides in the country, including tween the Ebenezer Baptist Church and records of law enforcement, civil rights the Martin Luther King Center, CRRJ used groups, and state and federal courts, as a case developed by one of our students well as images and oral histories. in an earlier clinic to bring this story back into modern memory, with front page In 2014, in addition to running our annu- stories in the Boston Globe and the Atlan- al student clinic, we undertook three new ta Journal Constitution and a feature on initiatives. We expanded our caseload by NPR’s Weekend Edition. partnering with Southern University Law Cover photos – Top: 16th Street Baptist Church Bombing, September 15, 1963 L to R: George Stinney Jr.; CRLS researches Bell case at Amite County Courthouse; Hosea Carter CRRJ DOCKET 2014 Freedom Summer Fellows, SULC Library Alabama ack Bloodworth, 35, was shot by a company officer of Jthe Tennessee Coal and Iron Company in August 1942 near Birmingham. Bloodworth, who was to be inducted into the Army the day after he was killed, went to col- lect his last paycheck from TCI. Bloodworth thought the check was 50 cents short and an argument ensued. The pay clerk summoned the company police, who shot and killed Bloodworth. A local coroner ruled the killing justifi- able, and a Department of Justice investigation produced no prosecution. To protest the slaying, 500 coal miners at the Docena mine went out on strike. Edward Green, 24, was killed in September 1943 in Millbrook, appar- ently because he refused to pick cotton. His body was later found in the Alabama River. CRRJ’s investigation re- vealed that Rev. Green was the half-brother of Rev. Fred Shuttlesworth. Shuttlesworth, who died in 2011, never knew the fate of Edward Green. CRRJ shared this newly discovered evidence with the Shuttlesworth family. Wal- ter Gunn, 34, was beaten and then shot to death in June 1942 in Tuskegee. The sheriff and his deputy followed Gunn home, pistol-whipped him and then shot him. The apparent motive was that Gunn was friendly with a black Amite County MS Chancery Court Records woman with whom the sheriff may have had a relation- ship. Medical authorities found that Gunn’s skull had been (CRS) of the Department of Justice prosecuted the sher- crushed from blunt force trauma. The Civil Rights Section iff and his deputy charging them under 18 USC § 242 on several indictments, including this killing. A federal jury acquitted the officers. John Johnson, 42 and a father of eight, was shot and killed in March 1948 by Birmingham police officers. CRRJ is investigating about ten 1948 Bir- mingham police slayings, of which Johnson is one. These cases were the subject of an NAACP national police brutal- ity campaign. William Lockwood, 59, was shot and killed by a deputy sheriff in May 1946 in Tuskegee. The deputy had arrested Lockwood’s son, and when the father asked why the young man was in custody, the deputy appar- ently got angry because Lockwood failed to “yes sir” him. The deputy got out of the police car and shot the elder Lockwood while his wife and son looked on (for more in- formation about this case, see “Featured Case” section of this annual report, page 9). Ike Madden, 27, was killed by Birmingham police in March 1948, allegedly because he M.Burnham and CRRJ Students E.Reid, F.Grier and R.Williams, 1 Southern University Law Center 2014 Freedom Summer Fellows, June 2014, Southern University Law Center was resisting arrest. John Pulse was killed by a mob and body, riddled with bullets and burned, was found hanging thrown in a creek in August 1940 in Tuscumbia. He was al- from a tree on the property. Robinson had killed a white leged to have stolen alcohol from white bootleggers. The man in a dispute over a storage battery. Five African-Amer- CRS received a letter from a local citizen addressed to Pres- icans who were in Robinson’s cabin when the mob came ident Roosevelt about the killing but, so far as the records for him were also slain. Robinson’s relatives currently re- disclose, it took no investigative action. Esau Robinson side in Springfield, MA. was lynched in July 1930 at his home in Emelle. Robinson’s Arkansas homas Foster, 26, a sergeant in the Army and a native was killed at a train station in Dumas in April 1945. He had Tof Philadelphia, was killed in Little Rock in March 1942. been traveling with a group of soldiers from a base in Lou- Foster, who was stationed at Camp Robinson, had attempt- isiana to one in California. He was shot by a town marshal, ed to intervene upon witnessing local and military police who told military authorities that as Green was re-board- assaulting off-duty black soldiers. Several policemen beat ing the train after a pit stop, he raised a clenched fist in a Foster to the ground and a Little Rock officer, Abner Hayes, sign of aggression. Willie Henry, 29, a Pacific Theatre vet- shot him five times at point-blank range. Calling the in- eran and a Chicago native, was killed by local police offi- cident a “clear case of murder,” the CRS presented a case cers in Helena in July 1946. Henry, who was disabled in the against Hayes to a federal grand jury in Little Rock. Before war, appeared to be suffering from a mental condition. He the proceedings commenced, Hayes had joined the Army. got into a dispute over a fare with a bus agent in Helena, The jury declined to indict him. A notation made by a mil- who struck him with a pipe. Henry jumped to safety into a itary official on Foster’s family’s application for a grave- nearby ditch, whereupon he was shot to death by Helena stone reads: “death was not in line of duty and was a result police officers. of own misconduct.” Adam Green, a private in the Army, Georgia ustin Calloway, 16, was arrested a day after he was al- loway had been lynched. Aaron Herman Schunell Dixon, Aleged to have assaulted a white woman in LaGrange in 17, was shot by police officers in Atlanta in April 1946. The September 1940. Six masked men persuaded the jailer to police were investigating a gambling game at a housing release the boy to them, whereupon they drove him to the project, where Dixon lived. One of the officers ordered the woods, beat him up and shot him. No prosecutorial action teen to stand near a garage, and as he proceeded to do so, was taken. However, the Calloway case figured prominently the officer shot and killed him. The other boys were taken in the public debate over the definition of a “lynching,” and to the station and forced to sign false statements that Dix- the killing was discussed at a conference held at Tuskegee in on advanced on the officer with a knife. The protests of the December 1940. The NAACP and other groups agreed Cal- housing project manager resulted in an investigation by the 2 Kimbrough Scholars meet town officials, McComb, MS Department of Jus- a private from Montgomery was stationed at Fort Benning tice and the NAACP. when he was found dead on the base hanging from a tree in Several witnesses March 1940, in full uniform with his legs and hands bound. claimed the officer The soldier had gone missing about a month earlier. When who killed Dixon was the public learned of the apparent lynching, letters poured not provoked and that in to the War Department and the Justice Department. The there was no knife. The War Department claimed to have conducted an investiga- Justice Department tion and found there was no foul play, but CRRJ has not declined to pursue the been able to locate the report. Although the Hall case is case.
Recommended publications
  • Guilty Until Proven Innocent Is the Death Penalty Morally Wrong?

    Guilty Until Proven Innocent Is the Death Penalty Morally Wrong?

    Guilty Until Proven Innocent Is the death penalty morally wrong? Within my research and installation, I examine the perceived flaws and shortcomings of the criminal justice system, particularly questioning the ways in which minority voices are disproportionally harmed when acts of “justice” are carried out. Through my art, I seek to confront the issues that the death penalty reflects; mass incarceration and the de- humanization of criminals in direct opposition to other goals such as rehabilitation. I also confront the issue of exoneration, when those who are convicted of crimes are proven innocent, focusing specifically on the moral problem of exoneration after execution. Any person of color can be an easy victim of the system, which is what I wanted to highlight with this piece. The contrast of the subjects in normal vs victimized situations is meant to show that, in the eyes of the system, for people of color, guilt is assumed regardless of reality. The chair serves as a blatant reminder of the harsh, old fashioned methods of execution. I challenge the concept of the death penalty as a method of getting revenge, enabling “an eye for an eye” mentality instead of using alternative methods to achieve restorative justice. The U.S. government should reform the current criminal justice system by abolishing the death penalty. Amara I. California Guilty Until Proven Innocent: Those Wronged By The Criminal Justice System Amara I. Is the death penalty morally wrong? In this paper, I examine some of the perceived flaws and shortcomings of the criminal justice system, particularly questioning the ways in which minority voices are harmed when acts of “justice” are carried out, with an emphasis on capital punishment in the United States.
  • REPAIRING the BREACH: a Brief History of Youth of Color in the Justice System 1

    REPAIRING the BREACH: a Brief History of Youth of Color in the Justice System 1

    REPAIRING THE BREACH: A Brief History of Youth of Color in the Justice System 1 REPAIRING THE BREACH A Brief History of Youth of Color in the Justice System JAMES BELL W. Haywood Burns Institute for Youth Justice Fairness & Equity 2 REPAIRING THE BREACH: A Brief History of Youth of Color in the Justice System The Burns Institute eliminates racial and ethnic disparities by building a community-centered response to youthful misbehavior that is equitable and restorative. We are a grassroots to grasstops organization. We believe innovation comes from the bottom and infuences those at the top. That’s why we work with decision makers at the local level to affect change that transforms youth justice systems near and far. Thank you to the following individuals who without their contributions and support this essay would not have been written: Joan Chyun, Anna Testa, Kai Hutson, Alana Kopke, Catherine Servati, Ariane Barr, Simon Mont, and Veronica Kontilis. REPAIRING THE BREACH: A Brief History of Youth of Color in the Justice System 1 REPAIRING THE BREACH: A BRIEF HISTORY OF YOUTH OF COLOR IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM Introduction At the time of this essay’s writing, more than 2 million people Enduring themes are present throughout this work. The frst is are incarcerated and more than 7 million are on probation, the societal underpinnings buttressing the ideas of children’s parole, or other supervision in the United States. Similarly, appropriate behaviors in general. A look at the historical we have nearly 1 million young people involved in the youth record reveals that when “children” are referenced, this term justice system.
  • Assessing the Roles of Race and Profit in the Mass Incarceration of Black People in America

    Assessing the Roles of Race and Profit in the Mass Incarceration of Black People in America

    ASSESSING THE ROLES OF RACE AND PROFIT IN THE MASS INCARCERATION OF BLACK PEOPLE IN AMERICA WILLIAMS C. IHEME* “And in the final analysis, a riot is the language of the unheard. And what is it that America has failed to hear? It has failed to hear that the plight of the Negro poor has worsened over the last few years. It has failed to hear that the promises of freedom and justice have not been met. And it has failed to hear that large segments of white society are more concerned about tranquility and the status quo than about justice, equality, and humanity. So in a real sense, our nation’s summer’s riots are caused by our nation’s winters of delay. And as long as America postpones justice, we stand in the position of having these recurrences of violence and riots over and over again.” —Martin Luther King Jr, The Other America, a speech delivered on April 14 1967, at Stanford University. Abstract: Shortly after the alleged discovery of America and its vast expanse of land waiting to be cultivated with cash crops using cheap human labor, millions of Africans fell victims and were kidnapped to work as slaves in American plantations for about four centuries. Even though it has been over 150 years since the official abolition of slavery in America, the effects of the 400 years of enslavement continue to reverberate: irrespective of the blackletter rights protecting Black people from injustices, the deep racist structures typically decrease the potency of these rights, and thus perpetuate oppression.
  • 2020 Tournament Distributed Packet

    2020 Tournament Distributed Packet

    Loomis Chaffee Debate Tournament – Resolution & Information packet Jan. 2020 Resolved, that the United States should adopt a program of reparations to redress the harms caused by historic, systemic racist policies, including slavery. Redress = to remedy or compensate for a wrong or grievence From the International Center for Transitional Justice Website “Overview of Reparations” Reparations serve to acknowledge the legal obligation of a state, or individual(s) or group, to repair the consequences of violations — either because it directly committed them or it failed to prevent them. They also express to victims and society more generally that the state is committed to addressing the root causes of past violations and ensuring they do not happen again. With their material and symbolic benefits, reparations are important to victims because they are often seen as the most direct and meaningful way of receiving justice. Yet, they are often the last-implemented and least-funded measure of transitional justice. It is important to remember that financial compensation — or the payment money — is only one of many different types of material reparations that can be provided to victims. Other types include restoring civil and political rights, erasing unfair criminal convictions, physical rehabilitation, and granting access to land, health care, or education. Sometimes, these measures are provided to victims’ family members, often children, in recognition that providing them with a better future is an important way to overcome the enduring consequences of the violations. Reparations can be implemented through administrative programs or enforced as the outcome of litigation. Oftentimes, they overlap and compete for state resources with programs against poverty, unemployment, and lack of access to resources, like land.
  • Just Mercy (Bryan Stevenson) Lesson Plans

    Just Mercy (Bryan Stevenson) Lesson Plans

    Just Mercy (Bryan Stevenson) Lesson Plans Just Mercy (Bryan Stevenson) by Bryan Stevenson (c)2017 BookRags, Inc. All rights reserved. Contents Just Mercy (Bryan Stevenson) Lesson Plans ............................................................................... 1 Contents ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 4 Lesson Calendar .......................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter Abstracts ...................................................................................................................... 18 Characters ................................................................................................................................. 31 Symbols/Objects ........................................................................................................................ 34 Daily Lessons ............................................................................................................................ 36 Fun Activities .............................................................................................................................. 55 Essay Topics .............................................................................................................................. 58 Short Essay
  • Miller W. Shealy, Jr

    Miller W. Shealy, Jr

    CURRICULUM VITAE Miller W. Shealy, Jr. Attorney and Counselor at Law, Professor of Law, Director of Clinical Programs, and Co-Director of Academic Success Charleston School of Law 81 Mary Street Charleston, S.C. 29403 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Webpage: www.MillerShealy.com __________________________________________________________________________ EMPLOYMENT Charleston School of Law, Charleston, South Carolina Professor of Law, Director of Clinical Programs, and Co-Director of Academic Success, 8/16 - Present Professor of law, 8/14 to 7/15 Associate Professor of Law, 8/11 – 8/14 Assistant Professor of Law, 8/05 – 8/11 Courses: Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Law of the Sea, White Collar Crime Seminar, Evidence, Trial Advocacy, Constitutional Law, Appellate Moot Court (sponsor/director). Admiralty & Maritime Law LLM faculty. Committees: Moot Court (Advocacy Competitions Sponsor), Recruitment, Practice Skills, Advocacy Programs Sponsor, and Legal Research Analysis and Writing. Finkel Law Firm LLC (Of Counsel), October 1, 2015 – July 2015 Page 1 of 9 Assistant U.S. Attorney, United States Department of Justice, United States Attorney’s Office – May 1995 to August 2005 District Coordinator: Corporate and Investor Fraud Working Group (Corporate Fraud Task Force) 9/02-8/05. General Criminal Section 2/02-9/02. Organized Crime and Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) from 6/95-2/02. Assistant State Attorney General, South Carolina Attorney General’s Office, Criminal Division, Columbia, South Carolina – July 1988 to May 1995 Substantial criminal appellate practice before South Carolina Appellate Courts and the United States Supreme Court, defense of Post-Conviction Relief actions in State Court, State agency representation and some Federal Habeas Corpus.
  • © 2012 Perzavia T. Praylow

    © 2012 Perzavia T. Praylow

    © 2012 Perzavia T. Praylow RE/MAKING MEN AND WOMEN FOR THE RACE: COEDUCATION, RESPECTABILITY AND BLACK STUDENT LEADERSHIP AT FISK UNIVERSITY, 1924-1970 BY PERZAVIA T. PRAYLOW DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2012 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor David Roediger, Co-Chair Professor James Anderson, Co-Chair Associate Professor Teresa Barnes Associate Professor Erik McDuffie ii ABSTRACT This dissertation analyzes the relationship between student self-determination, the existence of competing ideologies of respectable race leadership and the transformation of coeducation at Fisk University between the 1924 and 1970. Throughout, a major focus of this dissertation is to trace how ideologies of race leadership were transformed by student dissent at Fisk. As a result, this research is concerned with analyzing students’ redefinition and negotiation of race leadership at the college. Throughout, the author asserts that Fisk students used self- determination in order to transform models of race leadership at the college. Specifically, this manuscript provides a critical interrogation of the influence of New Negro, civil rights and Black Power philosophies on the self-determination of students and their notion of what constituted respectable race leadership between 1924 and 1970. This research is more than just a history of student dissent. “Re/Making Men and Women for the Race: Coeducation, Respectability and Black Student Leadership at Fisk University, 1924-1970,” in addition, highlights the complicated and contested meaning given to the historic and contemporary role played by Black colleges in preparing students for race leadership in the African American community.
  • Ct Death Penalty Executions

    Ct Death Penalty Executions

    Ct Death Penalty Executions Emmott never sympathize any piezochemistry declassifying straight, is Vic lomentaceous and overstayed enough? Longwise and arachnoid Mart abstain her fiddle-faddle plasmodium content and minimize chronically. Unpatronized and chewiest Clyde fleys while coloured Sherlock syllabicate her fulfilment alone and forewarn o'er. There was cruel and white and the death charges has moved to death penalty act to denote closing the girls No parole board to this past, joined with conspiring to. Criminal history of others occurred and has only solution that? The death sentences for this case in ct, that is placed a horse trader. Other countries are straightforward a look. Not a manner, but he eventually told the penalty back often accompanied such delay that ct death penalty executions. That his execution under BOP's lethal-injection protocol violates the Federal Death during Act FDPA The foreign court rightly declined to stop. Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin, as noble as the important of Columbia. Prosecutor wants defense to stop releasing evidence. Feds no longer seeking death all in Bridgeport The Day. In the last half century Connecticut has only executed two inmates both those whom volunteered for that punishment Malloy said Capital. On dignity of racial prejudice is currently at too are not make a different group of ct death penalty executions of components of the department announced that, at or when was. Brandon Bernard in Terre Haute, Ind.
  • Chapter 20 Capital Punishment

    Chapter 20 Capital Punishment

    The State of Criminal Justice 2016 237 CHAPTER 20 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT Ronald J. Tabak* I. OVERVIEW A. Recent Trends 1. 33% Further Drop in New Death Sentences, Mostly Imposed in a Few Jurisdictions The number of death penalties imposed in the United States in 2015 dropped by 33% from the previous year.1 Death sentences reached their annual peak at 315 in 1996.2 In 2010, 114 people were sentenced to death, the lowest number since 1973, the first full year that states began reintroducing capital punishment following Furman v. Georgia.3 In 2011, the number dropped considerably, to 85. The numbers were slightly lower in the next two years: 82 in 2012 and 83 in 2013.4 Then, in 2014, the number dropped to 73.5 In 2015, the Death Penalty Information Center estimated that the number of new death sentences had dropped precipitously further, to 49. While that number is subject to revision by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, it reflects a decline of approximately 33% in one year and another new low in the post-Furman era.6 More than half of all death sentences in 2015 reported by the Death Penalty Information Center were in California (14), Florida (9), and Alabama (6), with all but one of California’s death sentences coming from four counties in Southern California. This was the eighth consecutive year in which Texas’ total was under a dozen – falling to just two – well below its prior yearly totals (which peaked in 1999 at 48).7 Georgia was one of the many states that did not impose any new death sentences in 2015.
  • 216050251.Pdf

    216050251.Pdf

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ETD - Electronic Theses & Dissertations RAISING A NONVIOLENT ARMY: FOUR NASHVILLE BLACK COLLEGES AND THE CENTURY-LONG STRUGGLE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS, 1830s-1930s By Crystal A. deGregory Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in History May 2011 Approved: Professor Richard J. M. Blackett Professor Lewis V. Balwin Professor Gary Gerstle Professor Daniel H. Usner, Jr. Copyright © 2011 by Crystal A. deGregory All Rights Reserved To Dr. L.M. Collins, the embodiment of the HBCU teacher tradition; and Mr. August Johnson, for his ever-present example and encouragement. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work would not have been possible without the Vanderbilt University History Department, whose generous support allowed me to write and research this dissertation. I am grateful to the College of Arts and Sciences in particular, for awarding this project Social Science Dissertation Fellowship for the 2007/8 academic year. Similarly, I am also deeply indebted to The Commonwealth of the Bahamas‘ Ministry of Education for awarding me Bahamas Government Graduate Student Scholarships 2008/9 and 2009/10, and grateful to its helpful staff, especially Ann Russell of the Freeport Department. Finally, I would like to thank the Lyford Cay Foundation of Nassau, Bahamas for its financial support via the Lyford Cay Foundation Graduate Student Scholarship during the 2009/10 academic year and Lyford Cay Educational Programmes and Alumni Affiars Director Monique A. Hinsey in particular who was a godsend.
  • Death Penalty and the Victims Death Penalty and the Victims Death Penalty and the Victims

    Death Penalty and the Victims Death Penalty and the Victims Death Penalty and the Victims

    DEATH PENALTY AND THE VICTIMS DEATH PENALTY AND THE VICTIMS DEATH PENALTY AND THE VICTIMS © 2016 United Nations Worldwide rights reserved. This book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the author(s), editor, or the publisher, except as permitted by law. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Editor: Ivan Šimonovi´c Design and layout: dammsavage inc. Cover image: The cover features an adaptation of a photograph of a man who is granted mercy by the victim's family, sparing him from imminent execution. ©EPA/Arash Khamooshi Pictures from The Omega Suites by Lucinda Devlin, Bochum 2000 Electronic version of this publication is available at: www.ohchr.org/EN/NewYork/Pages/Resources.aspx Sales no.: E.16.XIV.2 ISBN: 978-92-1-154217-2 eISBN: 978-92-1-058395-4 DEATH PENALTY AND THE VICTIMS New York, 2016 with support of CONTENTS Preface – Ban Ki-moon, United Nations Secretary-General 7 Introduction – Who are the victims? Ivan Šimonovi´c, Assistant Secretary-General for Human Rights 9 CHAPTER 1 – MURDER VICTIMS’ FAMILIES 21 1.1 Complexity of Victims’ Families Position 22 • Marc Groenhuijsen, Michael O’Connell, Arguments against the death penalty as seen from a victimological perspective 22 • Maiko Tagusari, Does the death penalty serve victims? 41 1.2 Victims’ families’ perspective 49 • Mickell Branham, Listening to victims 49 • Mireya García Ramírez, The death penalty and the right to life 59 1.3 Victims’ Families and Closure 66 • Jody L.
  • Potential Impact of Untrustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice Risk Assessment Instruments

    Potential Impact of Untrustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice Risk Assessment Instruments

    Spring 2021 Technological Tethereds: Potential Impact of Untrustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice Risk Assessment Instruments Sonia M. Gipson Rankin University of New Mexico - School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/law_facultyscholarship Part of the Applied Ethics Commons, Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Information Security Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Theory and Algorithms Commons Recommended Citation Sonia M. Gipson Rankin, Technological Tethereds: Potential Impact of Untrustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice Risk Assessment Instruments, 78 Washington and Lee Law Review 647 (2021). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/law_facultyscholarship/858 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Technological Tethereds: Potential Impact of Untrustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice Risk Assessment Instruments Sonia M. Gipson Rankin* Abstract Issues of racial inequality and violence are front and center today, as are issues surrounding artificial intelligence (“AI”). This Article, written by a law professor who is also a computer scientist, takes a deep dive into understanding how and why hacked and rogue AI creates unlawful and unfair outcomes, particularly for persons of color. Black Americans are disproportionally featured in criminal justice, and their stories are obfuscated. The seemingly endless back-to-back murders of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, and heartbreakingly countless others have finally shaken the United States from its slumbering journey towards intentional criminal justice reform.