DOCSLIB.ORG

A Review of Captives and the Bermuda Captive Insurance Market

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Review of Captives and the Bermuda Captive Insurance Market Captive Insurance Guide A review of captives and the Bermuda captive insurance market Adding strength and balance to risk management — September, 2020 Contents © 2021 KPMG, a group of Bermuda limited liability companies which are member firms of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. KPMG Captive Insurance Guide 2 Additionally, a business won’t know the cost or terms of their insurance program for the upcoming year until policy renewal. This makes insurance a very difficult cost to budget against. Even if a business has a great year with very low claims, it is still possible for the premium Introduction to increase if the insurers portfolio (that includes your risk) has experienced a large volume of losses. These factors are receiving increased attention across businesses globally as the commercial insurance market has seen significant price increases globally. Businesses are now reviewing alternatives to commercial insurance and questioning whether their current insurance programs are still fit for purpose. Insurance premiums are a significant This guide provides a comprehensive background to one such alternative, captive insurance. Within the guide we will provide: operating cost for any business, irrespective of its location or industry. Unfortunately, the An overview of captives underwriting process isn’t as simple as an insurer pricing a risk to cover the potential loss for that business in the upcoming period. The insurer will also factor in the cost of Potential captive structures using their capital to insure the risk, including a margin for profit, as well as the overall performance of all their clients within the The drivers and benefits of captives for decision-makers: Risk Managers, CFOs, & CEOs risk concerned. A fundamental principle of insurance being that the premiums of the many cover the losses of the few. Major captive jurisdictions, and why Bermuda is a market leader The process of setting up a captive We will also include several case studies for projects we have completed, and background to the KPMG team in Bermuda that is leading the way as a captive centre of excellence. © 2021 KPMG, a group of Bermuda limited liability companies which are member firms of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. KPMG Captive Insurance Guide 3 An introduction and background to captives Captives – The captive insurance industry is experiencing change driven by the shifting regulatory landscape, the introduction of Solvency II, international tax developments and the hardening of the commercial an overview insurance market. More than 90% We see a number of trends in the use of captives: of Fortune 500 companies have A significant increase in small to mid-size captives, a captive up to US$5m net premium, created in recent years. An introduction and background to captives A growing trend for increased diversification within A ‘captive’ insurance company is an insurance company that captives to cover new risks, such as terrorism, 2018 net premiums for captives in is established to predominantly insure or reinsure the risks cyber and employee benefits. This has been led by Bermuda, Cayman and Barbados of its parent, or organisations affiliated with its parent(s). an increased drive for capital efficiency and building surpassed $3.5 bn out the captive based on success. Captives have existed in some form since the 1870s, when the first protection and indemnity clubs were created. Captives have also witnessed growth in insuring However, growth of the captive market was slow up until third party risks, such as insuring contractors hired the 1960s when only about 100 captives were formed. by the captive’s parent under an owner controlled program. By doing this the captive achieves The Bermuda market was where the significant growth In 2017 there were greater risk management, as well as recapturing of captives began in the 1970s, with greater growth in underwriting profit from the commercial 6,647 active captives worldwide the 1980s and 1990s due to a hard insurance market and insurance market. the difficulty in obtaining traditional insurance to cover organisations’ exposure to liability claims. A wide range of companies, not-for-profit organisations and government agencies worldwide rely on captives as part of their programs for managing risk. Emerging risks that are difficult to insure within traditional insurance markets have acted as another driving force behind the growth in captive insurance. A captive can also include risks that are generally excluded in traditional insurance policies. © 2021 KPMG, a group of Bermuda limited liability companies which are member firms of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. KPMG Captive Insurance Guide 4 Captives – There are a wide range of potential structures that can be adopted, including: Third party captives such as rent-a- 01 A single parent captive 02 structures captives and protected cell captives, and 03 A group/association captive. 01 02 03 Single parent captives Third party captives Group/association captives The captive is 100% owned by it’s parent who sets the risk Segregated Account Companies offer a business a softer Here multiple businesses, usually from the same industry, appetite and decides which lines of insurance the captive approach to incorporating a captive. The business can own will join together to pool their risk for one or more lines of underwrites and how capital should be utilised. Additionally, shares or a governing instrument within a segregated account insurance into one structure. This generally offers greater the parent also sets the investment strategy and can from the segregated account core. Most large insurance economies of scale and diversification if a business isn’t large decide how to distribute profits, should they be generated, managers operate a segregated account company. The core enough to warrant its own individual captive. This structure remains the most used within the industry comprises of a board of directors providing minimal regulatory and is accepted globally, proving an effective alternative to or operating capital. The liabilities of each cell is independent commercial insurance. and attributable to the shareholder. The liability of each cell owner are independent. © 2021 KPMG, a group of Bermuda limited liability companies which are member firms of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. KPMG Captive Insurance Guide 5 01 02 03 Captives – Captive Managers Fronting Insurer Reinsurance Solutions Captive managers provide a wide range Typically, captives are not licensed to Direct access to the reinsurance of services including: issue policies internationally, and some markets is a significant benefit of insurance products can only be provided creating a captive. The advantage of stakeholders Being the primary contact for the by locally regulated insurers. Through a purchasing reinsurance direct is that regulator, ensuring the captive is fronting arrangement a licensed insurer there is generally greater flexibility compliant with all regulations will issue the policy in the relevant within the policy terms, and the country, and then reinsure the risk, either wholesale pricing is comparably There are three primary stakeholders Preparing the captive’s financial and in whole (gross) or part (net) back to the lower than the commercial insurance for a captive: operational records captive. Today, many fronting insurers market. The cost for reinsurance will Providing insurance, risk prefer to retain a portion of the risk being heavily depend upon the risk appetite management and fronted. The major insurers who offer of the captive. underwriting expertise fronting services include: Preparing quarterly and annual AIG; financial reports Chubb; Coordinating captive board meetings Zurich; and Providing the link between the captive’s other service providers, AXA XL such as auditors and actuaries In terms of program structure fronting Bermuda is home to many of the largest partners offer a wide range of captive managers. services, including: Policy administration; Cash flow management; Claims management; and Compliance support © 2021 KPMG, a group of Bermuda limited liability companies which are member firms of the KPMG global organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee. All rights reserved. KPMG Captive Insurance Guide 6 Captives – drivers and benefits for decision-makers: Risk Managers, CFOs, and CEOs Risk Manager Chief Financial Officer Chief Executive Officer Improve the operational performance of the business Control cost management within the business Achieve stability and growth for the business Remove insurance pricing and coverage Reduce the insurance spend Remove any unwelcome surprises uncertainties Price risk in line with your experience and Long-term risk management strategy Create a program that meets the needs of not the market’s experience the business Internal company focus Control the claims process Allow staff to take greater accountability
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Gold Standard of the South Tennessee’S Director of Captive Insurance Belinda Fortman Discusses the State’S Latest Milestone of 700 Risk Bearing Entities
    www.captiveinsurancetimes.com The primary source of global captive insurance news and analysis 06 January 2021 - Issue 214 The gold standard of the southTennessee’s director of captive insurance Belinda Fortman discusses the state’s latest milestone of 700 risk bearing entities District of Columbia | New and Emerging Risks | 2021 Predictions | Industry Appointments The World’s Leading Independent Captive Manager SRS Europe is changing the Face of European Captive Management Specialist focus on captive insurance management and consultancy... It’s all we do Offering impartial advice and bespoke solutions without conflicting internal vested interests... It’s how we do it Driven by client service excellence underpinned by flexible, innovative and solid delivery... It’s focused on you Our Services European Operations Captive management Ireland Feasibility studies Liechtenstein Program management Luxembourg and underwriting services Malta Governance, risk & Netherlands compliance consulting Sweden Strategic reviews Switzerland Find out why over 500 captive clients trust SRS strategicrisks.com Captive Insurance Times Issue 214 www.captiveinsurancetimes.com Published by Black Knight Media Ltd 16 Bromley Road, New Beckenham Beckenham, BR3 5JE Editorial Editor: Becky Bellamy [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)208 075 0927 Reporter: Maria Ward-Brennan [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)208 075 0923 Contributor: Maddie Saghir [email protected] Designer: James Hickman [email protected] Marketing and sales Publisher: Justin Lawson [email protected] Associate Publisher: John Savage [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)208 075 0932 Office Manager: Chelsea Bowles Tel: +44 (0)208 075 0930 Follow us on Twitter: @CITimes Copyright © 2021 Black Knight Media Ltd All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit Era
    Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 2020, 151-168 The sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit era Maria Mut Bosque School of Law, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Spain MINECO DER 2017-86138, Ministry of Economic Affairs & Digital Transformation, Spain Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London, UK [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: This paper focuses on an analysis of the sovereignty of two territorial entities that have unique relations with the United Kingdom: the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories (BOTs). Each of these entities includes very different territories, with different legal statuses and varying forms of self-administration and constitutional linkages with the UK. However, they also share similarities and challenges that enable an analysis of these territories as a complete set. The incomplete sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and BOTs has entailed that all these territories (except Gibraltar) have not been allowed to participate in the 2016 Brexit referendum or in the withdrawal negotiations with the EU. Moreover, it is reasonable to assume that Brexit is not an exceptional situation. In the future there will be more and more relevant international issues for these territories which will remain outside of their direct control, but will have a direct impact on them. Thus, if no adjustments are made to their statuses, these territories will have to keep trusting that the UK will be able to represent their interests at the same level as its own interests. Keywords: Brexit, British Overseas Territories (BOTs), constitutional status, Crown Dependencies, sovereignty https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.114 • Received June 2019, accepted March 2020 © 2020—Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Guernsey 2014
    GUERNSEY 2014 From the publishers of GROWTH The captive space continues to demonstrate significant growth on the island STRUCTURE Why insurance-linked securities and PCCs are proving to be popular captive structures LOCATION How Guernsey offers an alternative location to other European domiciles 001_CRGuernsey2014_Cover.indd 1 07/02/2014 16:48 High-flying CORPORATE & COMMERCIAL / TRUST & FIDUCIARY / FUNDS INSURANCE / PROPERTY / DISPUTE RESOLUTION / INSOLVENCY Advocates PO Box 69, La Vieille Cour, La Plaiderie St Peter Port, Guernsey GY1 4BL Tel +44 (0)1481 713371 www.babbelegal.com Untitled-30616BAB_Ad_CaptiveReview_GR_200114_Fnl.indd 1 1 05/02/201420/01/2014 17:3216:10 FOREWORD Strategic thinking puts Guernsey in first position he Guernsey Financial Services Commis- Of particular importance is our regulatory sion (GFSC) licensed 89 new interna- regime which continues to respond to innova- REPORT EDITOR T tional insurers during 2013. This means tive proposals and this was reinforced by the Karolina Kaminska there were 758 international insurers licensed GFSC’s decision to form an Innovation Unit +44 (0)20 7832 6654 in the island at the end of December 2013. within the regulator. [email protected] A signifi cant proportion of the licences is- Guernsey also o ers proportionality STAFF WRITER sued were associated with structures related through meeting the insurance core principles Alexis Burris to insurance linked securities (ILS). This in- of the International Association of Insurance +44 (0) 20 7832 6656 cluded a Shariah-compliant ILS structure that Supervisors (IAIS). The decision taken in Janu- [email protected] was judged as the top innovative deal in Eu- ary 2011 not to seek equivalence with Solvency GROUP HEAD OF CONTENT rope and one of the Islamic fi nance Deals of II looks prescient in the light of the recent an- Gwyn Roberts the Year 2013 by Islamic Finance News.
    [Show full text]
  • English Economic Commission for Latin
    LIMITED LC /CAR/L. 210 ( Sem. 1 / 3 ) 3 February 1987 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN Subregional Headquarters for the Caribbean UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT Regional Workshop on Trade in Services St. John's, Antigua and Barbuda 10-12 March 1987 CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANIES IN THE CARIBBEAN - AN ANALYSIS by Greg L* Christie- The author is a lecturer in law at the University of the West Indies and is Director of the University's LL.M. Insurance Law postgraduate programme at the University's Cave Hill campus in Barbados. He is a member of the Barbados Institute of Insurance. This document has been prepared without formal editing. The views expressed are those of the Consultant and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Organizations. CONTENTS c (1) AN OVERVIEW OF CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANIES Page 1.1 THE CAPTIVE DEFINED 1 1.2 THE GROWTH DF THE WORLD CAPTIVE INDUSTRY 2 1.3 TYPES OF CAPTIVES 4 1. The Single Parent Owned Captive 2. The Group Captive 3. The Association Captive 4. The Rent-A-Captive 5. The Agency Captive 6. The Direct Writing Captive and the Reinsurance Capt ive 7. The Domestic captive and the Offshore Captive 1.4 REASONS FOR CAPTIVE FORMATION 15 1. Cost Reductions 2. Enhanced Cash Flow and Investment Income 3. Access to Reinsurance Markets 4. Personalized Coverage 5.. Provision of Coverage not Otherwise Available 6. Freedom of Investment and Movement of Funds 7. Enhanced Loss Control and Risk Management 1.5 CRITERIA FOR SELECTING CAPTIVE LOCATION 23 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeacon of Gibraltar and Archdeacon of Italy and Malta
    The Bishop in Europe: The Right Reverend Dr. Robert Innes The Suffragan Bishop in Europe: The Right Reverend David Hamid ARCHEACON OF GIBRALTAR AND ARCHDEACON OF ITALY AND MALTA Statement from the Bishops The Diocese in Europe is the 42nd Diocese of the Church of England. We are by far the biggest in terms of land area, as we range across over 42 countries in a territory approximately matching that covered by the Council of Europe, as well as Morocco. We currently attract unprecedented interest within the Church of England, as we are that part of the Church that specifically maintains links with continental Europe at a time of political uncertainty between the UK and the rest of Europe. Along with that, we have been in the fortunate position of being able to recruit some very high calibre lay and ordained staff. To help oversee our vast territory we have two bishops, the Diocesan Bishop Robert Innes who is based in Brussels, and the Suffragan Bishop David Hamid who is based in London. We have a diocesan office within Church House Westminster. We maintain strong connections with staff in the National Church Institutions. Importantly, and unlike English dioceses, our chaplaincies pay for their own clergy, and the diocese has relatively few support staff. Each appointment matters greatly to us. The diocesan strategy was formulated and approved over the course of 2015. We are emphasising our commitment to building up congregational life, our part in the re- evangelisation of the continent; our commitment to reconciliation at every level; and our particular role in serving the poor, the marginalised and the migrant.
    [Show full text]
  • British Overseas Territories Law
    British Overseas Territories Law Second Edition Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson HART PUBLISHING Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Kemp House , Chawley Park, Cumnor Hill, Oxford , OX2 9PH , UK HART PUBLISHING, the Hart/Stag logo, BLOOMSBURY and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published in Great Britain 2018 First edition published in 2011 Copyright © Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson , 2018 Ian Hendry and Susan Dickson have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identifi ed as Authors of this work. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. While every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this work, no responsibility for loss or damage occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any statement in it can be accepted by the authors, editors or publishers. All UK Government legislation and other public sector information used in the work is Crown Copyright © . All House of Lords and House of Commons information used in the work is Parliamentary Copyright © . This information is reused under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 ( http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/3 ) except where otherwise stated. All Eur-lex material used in the work is © European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ , 1998–2018. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Arm of the Bribery
    8 The Lawyer | 30 July 2012 Opinion On 5 July the Competition Appeal can be awarded where compensatory Holdvery Tribunal (CAT) handed down its damages alone would be insufficient judgment in the Cardiff Bus case, to punish the defendant for ‘outra- awarding damages in a ‘follow-on’ geous conduct’ including, as in this tightplease, claim for the first time. This is also case, when the defendant was or the first case in which exemplary should have been aware that its con- claimants damages for a breach of competition duct was probably illegal. law have been awarded. The CAT also stated that when ex- Award of exemplary In January 2011, 2 Travel brought a emplary damages are considered claim against Cardiff Bus following a they should have some bearing to the Y damages in Cardiff 2008 decision of the Office of Fair M compensatory damages awarded – in A L Bus case raises the Trading (OFT) which found that, by A this case, awarding exemplary dam- engaging in predatory conduct, Wheels of justice go round and round ages about twice the size of the com- stakes for claimants in Cardiff Bus had infringed the Com- pensatory award – and that they damages actions petition Act by abusing a dominant awarded damages for loss of profits should have regard to the economic position in the market. In particular, (of £33,818.79 plus interest) and also size of the defendant to be “of an when 2 Travel launched a no-frills exemplary damages of £60,000. order of magnitude sufficient to bus service, Cardiff Bus introduced Notwithstanding the low value of make the defendant take notice”.
    [Show full text]
  • Work in Progress Work Is Underway to Boost Captive Growth in Hong Kong but Will Updated Legislation Be Enough to Draw in New Captives?
    www.captiveinsurancetimes.com The primary source of global captive insurance news and analysis 27 May 2020 - Issue 199 Work in progress Work is underway to boost captive growth in Hong Kong but will updated legislation be enough to draw in new captives? Barbados Insight CIC Services vs IRS Emerging Talent Justin Cole of DGM Financial Sean King of CIC Services discusses Mike Scott Group discusses the current the firm’s upcoming case against Assistant vice president captive climate in Barbados the IRS in the Supreme Court Global Captive Management Captive Insurance Times Issue 199 www.captiveinsurancetimes.com Published by Black Knight Media Ltd 16 Bromley Road, New Beckenham Beckenham, BR3 5JE Editorial Editor: Becky Bellamy [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)208 075 0927 cover image by weerasak_saeku/shutterstock.com Reporter: Maria Ward-Brennan [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)208 075 0923 Contributor: Maddie Saghir [email protected] Designer: James Hickman [email protected] Marketing and sales Associate Publisher: John Savage [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)208 075 0932 Publisher: Justin Lawson [email protected] Office Manager: Chelsea Bowles Tel: +44 (0)208 075 0930 Follow us on Twitter: @CITimes Copyright © 2020 Black Knight Media Ltd All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without permission in writing from the publisher. Company reg: 0719464 www.captiveinsurancetimes.com WE KNOW CAPTIVE INSURANCE. For more than 70 years, no firm has had a more complete understanding of the captive and self- insured market than Milliman.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    PRESS RELEASE No: 81/2018 Date: 12th February Territories Take up Oceans, Plastics and More Minister for Environment and Climate Change John Cortes has co-chaired a meeting of the Council of Environment Ministers of the U.K. Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies held in Douglas on the Isle of Man. The meeting was hosted by the Isle of Man Government, whose Minister for Environment the Hon Geoffrey Boot co-chaired the two-day meeting. Thirteen territories were represented, and discussed a wide range of issues centring around the Environment. These included Climate Change, severe weather events, sustainable development, biodiversity, renewable energy, funding, Brexit, plastic pollution and the protection of the oceans. The Council was joined on the second day by officials from three U.K. Government departments, including Mr Ben Merrick, Director Overseas Territories at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Dr Gemma Harper, Depty Director for Marine from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), and Mr Huw Davis, Deputy Head of UNFCCC Negotiations representing the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. The Under-Secretary of State for the Environment, Dr Therese Coffey, joined the meeting by Skype. This was the first time that a UK Minister has directly participated in a meeting of the Council, which was originally set up in Gibraltar in 2015. The aim of the Council is to bring together Ministers and equivalents and senior officials from all the UK overseas jurisdictions in order to work together to improve environmental governance and sustainable development, and to engage the UK Government as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Overseas Territories
    INFORMATION PAPER United Kingdom Overseas Territories - Toponymic Information United Kingdom Overseas Territories (UKOTs), also known as British Overseas Territories (BOTs), have constitutional and historical links with the United Kingdom, but do not form part of the United Kingdom itself. The Queen is the Head of State of all the UKOTs, and she is represented by a Governor or Commissioner (apart from the UK Sovereign Base Areas that are administered by MOD). Each Territory has its own Constitution, its own Government and its own local laws. The 14 territories are: Anguilla; Bermuda; British Antarctic Territory (BAT); British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT); British Virgin Islands; Cayman Islands; Falkland Islands; Gibraltar; Montserrat; Pitcairn, Henderson, Ducie and Oeno Islands; Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha; South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands; Turks and Caicos Islands; UK Sovereign Base Areas. PCGN recommend the term ‘British Overseas Territory Capital’ for the administrative centres of UKOTs. Production of mapping over the UKOTs does not take place systematically in the UK. Maps produced by the relevant territory, preferably by official bodies such as the local government or tourism authority, should be used for current geographical names. National government websites could also be used as an additional reference. Additionally, FCDO and MOD briefing maps may be used as a source for names in UKOTs. See the FCDO White Paper for more information about the UKOTs. ANGUILLA The territory, situated in the Caribbean, consists of the main island of Anguilla plus some smaller, mostly uninhabited islands. It is separated from the island of Saint Martin (split between Saint-Martin (France) and Sint Maarten (Netherlands)), 17km to the south, by the Anguilla Channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Vanuatu Insurance Act No. 54 of 2005
    REPUBLIC OF VANUATU INSURANCE ACT NO. 54 OF 2005 Arrangement of Sections PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1 Interpretation 2 Meaning of insurance policy 3 Marine Insurance Act PART 2 – THE COMMISSION’S ADMINISTRATION OF THE ACT 4 The objectives of insurance supervision 5 Applications to the Commission 6 Powers of the Commission to obtain information and documents 7 On site inspections 8 Variations to an advertisement, brochure or similar document 9 Policy classification 10 Appointment of Inspector 11 Investigation by inspectors 12 Exchange of information with other insurance supervisors 13 Confidentiality PART 3 LICENCES 14 Licence to conduct insurance business 15 Domestic insurers to maintain assets 16 Licensing of insurance broker, insurance agent and independent insurance salesperson 17 Application for licence 18 Additional information and consideration of a licence application 19 Licence 20 Conditions of licence 21 Variation and cancellation of conditions of a licence 22 A licensee’s obligation 23 Reporting duties of an insurance manager 24 Restriction on activities of insurer 25 Suspension of a licence 26 Revocation of the suspension of a licence 27 Cancellation of licence 28 Failure to commence or continue a licensed business 1 29 Prohibition on using certain words or doing certain acts 30 Unlicensed person cannot conduct insurance business PART 4 CAPITAL ADEQUACY 31 Minimum capital 32 Maintenance of financially sound condition 33 Assets of an insurer 34 Categories of assets 35 Deeming provisions of assets 36 Life insurer’s liabilities 37 General
    [Show full text]
  • Cagliari International Container Terminal
    CAGLIARI INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMINAL THE CENTER AT YOUR SERVICE 1 Copyright Contship Italia Group 2019 CAGLIARI INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMINAL MINIMAL DEVIATION FROM SUEZ–GIBRALTAR MAIN ROUTE Optimal weather conditions 365 d/y Zero delays on vessel maneuvring in-out EXTENDED HOME PORT FOR NORTH AFRICAN ECONOMIES 2 Copyright Contship Italia Group 2019 TOTAL RELIABILITY UPDATED 2019 WAIT AT ANCHOR VESSEL ON BERTH START OPERATIONS UNBERTHING AFTER (PILOT STATION) END OF OPERATIONS 1.5 Hours 20 Minutes 1.2 Hours AVERAGE DATA CALCULATED ON 192 OCEAN VESSELS AND 72 FEEDER VESSEL CALLS DURING 2018 3 Copyright Contship Italia Group 2019 CICT AT A GLANCE Handling Capacity Length of Quay Terminal Area 1.3 million TEUs 1,520 m 400,000 m2 3.6 million TEUs* 1,900 m* 900,000 m2* Water Depth Quay Cranes Yard Equipment Reefer Plugs 17 RTG 7 Gantry Crane 5 Reach Stacker 16 m (up to 18 rows) 10 Front Loader 1,000 1 Mobile Crane 31 Trucks *Future development *Future 32 Trailers UPDATED 2019 4 Copyright Contship Italia Group 2019 OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY AND RELIABILITY MAXIMUM RELIABILITY FOR MOTHER-MOTHER AND MOTHER-FEEDER DIRECT CONNECTIONS FLEXIBLE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY VESSEL OPERATION 5 Copyright Contship Italia Group 2019 VOLUMES (TEUs and Vessel Calls) 8.4 MILLION TEUS HANDLED 303,000 495,000 631,000 690,000 532,000 257,000 709,000 576,000 558,000 582,000 656,000 656,000 686,000 671,000 433,000 215,000 UPDATED 2019 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 341 788 1081 791 421 289 963 813 770 811 835 795
    [Show full text]