Anaesthesia and Allergic Drug Reactions G
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Allergic Reactions After Vaccination: Translating Guidelines Into Clinical Practice
R E V I E W EUR ANN ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL VOL 51, N 2, 51-61, 2019 A. RADICE1, G. CARLI2, D. MACCHIA1, A. FARSI2 Allergic reactions after vaccination: translating guidelines into clinical practice 1SOS Allergologia e Immunologia, Firenze, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Italy 2SOS Allergologia e Immunologia, Prato, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Italy KEYWORDS Summary vaccine; vaccination; allergic reactions; Vaccination represents one of the most powerful medical interventions on global health. anaphylaxis; vaccine hesitancy; vaccine Despite being safe, sustainable, and effective against infectious and in some cases also components; desensitization non-infectious diseases, it’s nowadays facing general opinion’s hesitancy because of a false perceived risk of adverse events. Adverse reactions to vaccines are relatively rare, instead, and those recognizing a hypersensitivity mechanism are even rarer. Corresponding author The purpose of this review is to offer a practical approach to adverse events after vaccina- Anna Radice Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio tion, focusing on immune-mediated reactions with particular regard to their recognition, Via Torregalli 3, 50143 Firenze diagnosis and management. Phone: +39 055 6932304 According to clinical features, we propose an algorythm for allergologic work-up, which E-mail: [email protected] helps in confirming hypersensitivity to vaccine, nonetheless ensuring access to vaccination. Finally, a screening questionnaire is included, providing criteria for immunisation in spe- Doi cialized care settings. 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.86 Introduction The gain from vaccination is not just about human health, but it is also a matter of financial resources for health systems. “Smallpox is dead” stated the magazine of the World Health It has been calculated that for every dollar spent in vaccines, Organisation (WHO) in 1980. -
Expression of Multiple Populations of Nicotinic Acetylcholine
EXPRESSION OF MULTIPLE POPULATIONS OF NICOTINIC ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORS IN BOVINE ADRENAL CHROMAFFIN CELLS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Bryan W. Wenger, B.A. The Ohio State University 2003 Dissertation Committee: Approved by: Professor Dennis B. McKay, Advisor Professor R. Thomas Boyd ________________________ Advisor Professor Popat N. Patil College of Pharmacy Professor Lane Wallace, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The importance of the role of nAChRs in physiological and pathological states is becoming increasingly clear. It is apparent that there are multitudes of nAChR subtypes with different expression patterns, pharmacologies and functions that may be important in various disease states. Therefore, a greater understanding of nAChR subtypes is essential for potential pharmacological intervention in nAChR systems. Bovine adrenal chromaffin cells are a primary culture of a neuronal type cell that express ganglionic types of nAChRs whose activation can be related to a functional response. While much is known about the outcome of functional activation of adrenal nAChRs, little work has been done in characterizing populations of nAChRs in adrenal chromaffin cells. These studies characterize the pharmacology and regulation of populations of nAChRs found in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. The primary findings of this research include 1) the characterization of an irreversible antagonist of adrenal nAChRs, 2) the discovery of -
Muscle Relaxants Physiologic and Pharmacologic Aspects
K. Fukushima • R. Ochiai (Eds.) Muscle Relaxants Physiologic and Pharmacologic Aspects With 125 Figures Springer Contents Preface V List of Contributors XVII 1. History of Muscle Relaxants Some Early Approaches to Relaxation in the United Kingdom J.P. Payne 3 The Final Steps Leading to the Anesthetic Use of Muscle Relaxants F.F. Foldes 8 History of Muscle Relaxants in Japan K. Iwatsuki 13 2. The Neuromuscular Junctions - Update Mechanisms of Action of Reversal Agents W.C. Bowman 19 Nicotinic Receptors F.G. Standaert 31 The Neuromuscular Junction—Basic Receptor Pharmacology J.A. Jeevendra Martyn 37 Muscle Contraction and Calcium Ion M. Endo 48 3. Current Basic Experimental Works Related to Neuromuscular Blockade in Present and Future Prejunctional Actions of Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs I.G. Marshall, C. Prior, J. Dempster, and L. Tian 51 VII VIII Approaches to Short-Acting Neuromuscular Blocking Agents J.B. Stenlake 62 Effects Other than Relaxation of Non-Depolarizing Muscle Relaxants E.S. Vizi 67 Regulation of Innervation-Related Properties of Cultured Skeletal Muscle Cells by Transmitter and Co-Transmitters R.H. Henning 82 4. Current Clinical Experimental Works Related to Neuromuscular Blockade in Present and Future Where Should Experimental Works Be Conducted? R.D. Miller 93 Muscle Relaxants in the Intensive Care Unit ! J.E. Caldwell 95 New Relaxants in the Operating Room R.K. Mirakhur 105 Kinetic-Dynamic Modelling of Neuromuscular Blockade C. Shanks Ill 5. Basic Aspects of Neuromuscular Junction Physiology of the Neuromuscular Junction W.C. Bowman 117 Properties of <x7-Containing Acetylcholine Receptors and Their Expression in Both Neurons and Muscle D.K. -
Muscle Relaxants Femoral Arteriography.,,>
IN THIS ISSUE: , .:t.i ". Muscle Relaxants fI, \'.' \., Femoral ArteriographY.,,> University of Minnesota Medical Bulletin Editor ROBERT B. HOWARD, M.D. Associate Editors RAY M. AMBERG GILBERT S. CAMPBELL, M.D. ELLIS S. BENSON, MD. BYRON B. COCHRANE, M.D. E. B. BROWN, PhD. RICHARD T. SMITH, M.D. WESLEY W. SPINK, MD. University of Minnesota Medical School J. 1. MORRILL, President, University of Minnesota HAROLD S. DIEHL, MD., Dean, College of Medical SciencBs WILLIAM F. MALONEY, M.D., Assistant Dean N. 1. GAULT, JR., MD., Assistant Dean University Hospitals RAY M. AMBERG, Director Minnesota Medical Foundation WESLEY W. SPINK, M.D., President R. S. YLVISAKER, MD., Vice-President ROBERT B. HOWARD, M.D., Secretary-Treasurer Minnesota Medical Alumni Association BYRON B. COCHRANE, M.D., President VIRGIL J. P. LUNDQUIST, M.D., First Vice-President SHELDON M. LAGAARD, MD., Second Vice-President LEONARD A. BOROWICZ, M.D., Secretary JAMES C. MANKEY, M.D., Treasurer UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Medical Bulletin OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA HOSPITALS, MINNE· SOTA MEDICAL FOUNDATION, AND MINNESOTA MEDICAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION VOLUME XXVIII December 1, 1956 NUMBER 4 CONTENTS STAFF MEETING REPORTS Current Status of Muscle Relaxants BY J. Albert Jackson, MD., J. H. Matthews, M.D., J. J. Buckley, M.D., D.S.P. Weatherhead, M.D., AND F. H. Van Bergen, M.D. 114 Small Vessel Changes in Femoral Arteriography BY Alexander R. Margulis, M.D. AND T. O. Murphy, MD.__ 123 EDITORIALS .. - -. - ---__ __ _ 132 MEDICAL SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ----------- 133 POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION - 135 COMING EVENTS 136 PIIb1ished semi.monthly from October 15 to JUDe 15 at Minneapolis, Minnesota. -
Pharmacological Studies on Pupillary Reflex Dilatation
PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDIES ON PUPILLARY REFLEX DILATATION SHINJI OONO Departmentof Pharmacology,Faculty of Medicine,Kyushu University, Fukuoka Received for publication September 20, 1964 Concerning the role of sympathetic and parasympathetic mechanisms in reflex dilatation of the pupil elicited by painful stimuli, there have long been many argu ments. One group of authors, for example, Bechterew (1) and Braunstein (2) concluded that the pupillary dilatation resulting from painful stimuli was caused solely by inhibi tion of the third cranial nerve activity. Another group of investigators, for example, Lieben and Kahn (3), Bain, Irving and McSwiney (4), Ury and Gellhorn (5), Ury and Oldberg (6) and Seybold and Moore (7) were of the opinion that parasympathetic in hibition was the principal factor in the reflex dilatation while sympathetic excitation was a negligible one. On the contrary, others, for instance, Luchsinger (8), Anderson (9), and Dechaume (10) claimed that sympathetic excitation was responsible for the pupillary reaction which was absent after cervical sympathectomy. Weinstein and Bender (11) compared the pupillary reflex activity in cats and mon keys. They concluded that a species-difference exists: in both species pupillary dilata tion is accomplished by both parasympathetic inhibitory and sympathetic excitatory mechanism. In the cat, inhibition of the parasympathetic mechanism is predominant while in the monkey excitation of the sympathetic mechanism is of greater importance . Later Lowenstein and Loewenfeld (12) performed more detailed experiments in cats using their own pupillographic instrument; they observed that pupillary reflex dilata tion was mostly due to sympathetic excitation, and was reduced to less than one-fifth of the normal control dilatation after sympathectomy. -
Drug Allergies: an Epidemic of Over-Diagnosis
Drug Allergies: An Epidemic of Over-diagnosis Donald D. Stevenson MD Senior Consultant Div of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Scripps Clinic Learning objectives • Classification of drug induced adverse reactions vs hypersensitivity reactions • Patient reports of drug induced reactions grossly overstate the true prevalence • The 2 most commonly recorded drug “allergies”: NSAIDs and Penicillin • Accurate diagnoses of drug allergies • Consequences of falsely identifying a drug as causing allergic reactions Classification of Drug Associated Events • Type A: Events occur in most normal humans, given sufficient dose and duration of therapy (85-90%) – Overdose Barbiturates, morphine, cocaine, Tylenol – Side effects ASA in high enough doses induces tinnitus – Indirect effects Alteration of microbiota (antibiotics) – Drug interactions Increased blood levels digoxin (Erythromycin) • Type B: Drug reactions are restricted to a small subset of the general population (10-15%) where patients respond abnormally to pharmacologic doses of the drug – Intolerance: Gastritis sometimes bleeding from NSAIDs – Hypersensitivity: Non-immune mediated (NSAIDs, RCM) – Hypersensitivity: Immune mediated (NSAIDs, Penicillins ) Celik G, Pichler WJ, Adkinson Jr NF Drug Allergy Chap 68 Middleton’s Allergy: Principles and Practice, 7th Ed, Elsevier Inc. 2009; pg 1206 1206. Immunopathologic (Allergic) reactions to drugs (antigens): Sensitization followed by re-exposure to same drug antigen triggering reaction Type I Immediate Hypersensitivity IgE Mediated Skin testing followed -
Neuronal Nicotinic Receptors
NEURONAL NICOTINIC RECEPTORS Dr Christopher G V Sharples and preparations lend themselves to physiological and pharmacological investigations, and there followed a Professor Susan Wonnacott period of intense study of the properties of nAChR- mediating transmission at these sites. nAChRs at the Department of Biology and Biochemistry, muscle endplate and in sympathetic ganglia could be University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK distinguished by their respective preferences for C10 and C6 polymethylene bistrimethylammonium Susan Wonnacott is Professor of compounds, notably decamethonium and Neuroscience and Christopher Sharples is a hexamethonium,5 providing the first hint of diversity post-doctoral research officer within the among nAChRs. Department of Biology and Biochemistry at Biochemical approaches to elucidate the structure the University of Bath. Their research and function of the nAChR protein in the 1970’s were focuses on understanding the molecular and facilitated by the abundance of nicotinic synapses cellular events underlying the effects of akin to the muscle endplate, in electric organs of the acute and chronic nicotinic receptor electric ray,Torpedo , and eel, Electrophorus . High stimulation. This is with the goal of affinity snakea -toxins, principallyaa -bungarotoxin ( - Bgt), enabled the nAChR protein to be purified, and elucidating the structure, function and subsequently resolved into 4 different subunits regulation of neuronal nicotinic receptors. designateda ,bg , and d .6 An additional subunit, e , was subsequently identified in adult muscle. In the early 1980’s, these subunits were cloned and sequenced, The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) arguably and the era of the molecular analysis of the nAChR has the longest history of experimental study of any commenced. -
Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Muscle Relaxants
i ,I .. / ,""- Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2: 330-343 (1977) © ADIS Press 1977 Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Muscle Relaxants L.B. Wingard and DR. Cook Departments of Pharmacology and Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania SUl1lmary Muscle relaxants are commonly used as an adjunct to general anaesthesia and to facilitate ventilator care in the intensive care unit. The muscle relaxants are unique in that the degree of neurol1luscular blockade can be directly measured. Thus, for some of the muscle relaxants it is possible to correlate the degree of neuromuscular blockade with the plasma concentration of drug. This quantilalive pllGrmacokinelic approach has been applied primarily to d tubocurarine and to a lesser extent to suxamethonium (succinylcholine), gallamine and pan curoniul1l. The pharl1lacokinetic information for the other relaxants is mostly descriptive and incomplete. The variation in drug concentration over time is in.fluenced by the distribution, metabolism and excretion of drug. Metabolism by plasma cholinesterase plays a maJor role in the termina tion (~f action of suxamethonium. Although pancuronium is partly metabolised its major metabolites have moderate pharmacological activity. The other relaxants are excreted through the kidney. For gallamine and dimethyl-tubocurarine, renal excretion appears to be the only means qf eliinination. However, biliary excretion probably provides an alternative route of elimination for d-tubocurarine and pancuronium. In patients with impaired renal function the duration qf neuromusClilar blockade may be markedly prolonged following standard doses of gallamine or dimethyl-tubocurarine, may be slightly prolonged following standard doses of pancumnium, and is near normal following standard doses qf d-tubocurarine. Following large or repeated doses q(pancuronium or d-tubocurarine, the duration q{ neuromuscular blockade may be markedly prolonged. -
Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
nAChR Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors nAChRs (nicotinic acetylcholine receptors) are neuron receptor proteins that signal for muscular contraction upon a chemical stimulus. They are cholinergic receptors that form ligand-gated ion channels in the plasma membranes of certain neurons and on the presynaptic and postsynaptic sides of theneuromuscular junction. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are the best-studied of the ionotropic receptors. Like the other type of acetylcholine receptor-the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR)-the nAChR is triggered by the binding of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh). Just as muscarinic receptors are named such because they are also activated by muscarine, nicotinic receptors can be opened not only by acetylcholine but also by nicotine —hence the name "nicotinic". www.MedChemExpress.com 1 nAChR Inhibitors & Modulators (+)-Sparteine (-)-(S)-B-973B Cat. No.: HY-W008350 Cat. No.: HY-114269 Bioactivity: (+)-Sparteine is a natural alkaloid acting as a ganglionic Bioactivity: (-)-(S)-B-973B is a potent allosteric agonist and positive blocking agent. (+)-Sparteine competitively blocks nicotinic allosteric modulator of α7 nAChR, with antinociceptive ACh receptor in the neurons. activity [1]. Purity: 98.0% Purity: 99.93% Clinical Data: No Development Reported Clinical Data: No Development Reported Size: 10mM x 1mL in Water, Size: 10mM x 1mL in DMSO, 100 mg 5 mg, 10 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg (±)-Epibatidine A-867744 (CMI 545) Cat. No.: HY-101078 Cat. No.: HY-12149 Bioactivity: (±)-Epibatidine is a nicotinic agonist. (±)-Epibatidine is a Bioactivity: A-867744 is a positive allosteric modulator of α7 nAChRs (IC50 neuronal nAChR agonist. values are 0.98 and 1.12 μM for human and rat α7 receptor ACh-evoked currents respectively, in X. -
On the Approximation of the Laws of the Member States Relating to Cosmetic Products (76/768/EEC )
27 . 9 . 76 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 262/169 COUNCIL DIRECTIVE of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products (76/768/EEC ) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, regards the composition, labelling and packaging of cosmetic products ; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the Euro pean Economic Community, and in particular Whereas this Directive relates only to cosmetic prod Article 100 thereof, ucts and not to pharmaceutical specialities and medicinal products ; whereas for this purpose it is necessary to define the scope of the Directive by Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, delimiting the field of cosmetics from that of phar maceuticals ; whereas this delimitation follows in particular from the detailed definition of cosmetic Having regard to the opinion of the European Parlia products, which refers both to their areas of appli ment ( 1 ), cation and to the purposes of their use; whereas this Directive is not applicable to the products that fall Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and under the definition of cosmetic product but are Social Committee (2 ), exclusively intended to protect from disease; whereas, moreover, it is advisable to specify that certain prod ucts come under this definition, whilst products Whereas the provisions laid down by law, regulation containing substances or preparations intended to be or administrative action in force in the Member ingested, inhaled, injected or implanted in the human States -
Prevalence and Impact of Reported Drug Allergies Among Rheumatology Patients
diagnostics Article Prevalence and Impact of Reported Drug Allergies among Rheumatology Patients Shirley Chiu Wai Chan , Winnie Wan Yin Yeung, Jane Chi Yan Wong, Ernest Sing Hong Chui, Matthew Shing Him Lee, Ho Yin Chung, Tommy Tsang Cheung, Chak Sing Lau and Philip Hei Li * Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong; [email protected] (S.C.W.C.); [email protected] (W.W.Y.Y.); [email protected] (J.C.Y.W.); [email protected] (E.S.H.C.); [email protected] (M.S.H.L.); [email protected] (H.Y.C.); [email protected] (T.T.C.); [email protected] (C.S.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +852-2255-3348 Received: 28 October 2020; Accepted: 7 November 2020; Published: 9 November 2020 Abstract: Background: Drug allergies (DA) are immunologically mediated adverse drug reactions and their manifestations depend on a variety of drug- and patient-specific factors. The dysregulated immune system underpinning rheumatological diseases may also lead to an increase in hypersensitivity reactions, including DA. The higher prevalence of reported DA, especially anti-microbials, also restricts the medication repertoire for these already immunocompromised patients. However, few studies have examined the prevalence and impact of reported DA in this group of patients. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA), or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were recruited from the rheumatology clinics in a tertiary referral hospital between 2018 and 2019. Prevalence and clinical outcomes of reported DA among different rheumatological diseases were calculated and compared to a cohort of hospitalized non-rheumatology patients within the same period. -
Drug and Medication Classification Schedule
KENTUCKY HORSE RACING COMMISSION UNIFORM DRUG, MEDICATION, AND SUBSTANCE CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE KHRC 8-020-1 (11/2018) Class A drugs, medications, and substances are those (1) that have the highest potential to influence performance in the equine athlete, regardless of their approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or (2) that lack approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration but have pharmacologic effects similar to certain Class B drugs, medications, or substances that are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Acecarbromal Bolasterone Cimaterol Divalproex Fluanisone Acetophenazine Boldione Citalopram Dixyrazine Fludiazepam Adinazolam Brimondine Cllibucaine Donepezil Flunitrazepam Alcuronium Bromazepam Clobazam Dopamine Fluopromazine Alfentanil Bromfenac Clocapramine Doxacurium Fluoresone Almotriptan Bromisovalum Clomethiazole Doxapram Fluoxetine Alphaprodine Bromocriptine Clomipramine Doxazosin Flupenthixol Alpidem Bromperidol Clonazepam Doxefazepam Flupirtine Alprazolam Brotizolam Clorazepate Doxepin Flurazepam Alprenolol Bufexamac Clormecaine Droperidol Fluspirilene Althesin Bupivacaine Clostebol Duloxetine Flutoprazepam Aminorex Buprenorphine Clothiapine Eletriptan Fluvoxamine Amisulpride Buspirone Clotiazepam Enalapril Formebolone Amitriptyline Bupropion Cloxazolam Enciprazine Fosinopril Amobarbital Butabartital Clozapine Endorphins Furzabol Amoxapine Butacaine Cobratoxin Enkephalins Galantamine Amperozide Butalbital Cocaine Ephedrine Gallamine Amphetamine Butanilicaine Codeine