DOCSLIB.ORG

Expression of Multiple Populations of Nicotinic Acetylcholine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Expression of Multiple Populations of Nicotinic Acetylcholine EXPRESSION OF MULTIPLE POPULATIONS OF NICOTINIC ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORS IN BOVINE ADRENAL CHROMAFFIN CELLS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Bryan W. Wenger, B.A. The Ohio State University 2003 Dissertation Committee: Approved by: Professor Dennis B. McKay, Advisor Professor R. Thomas Boyd ________________________ Advisor Professor Popat N. Patil College of Pharmacy Professor Lane Wallace, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The importance of the role of nAChRs in physiological and pathological states is becoming increasingly clear. It is apparent that there are multitudes of nAChR subtypes with different expression patterns, pharmacologies and functions that may be important in various disease states. Therefore, a greater understanding of nAChR subtypes is essential for potential pharmacological intervention in nAChR systems. Bovine adrenal chromaffin cells are a primary culture of a neuronal type cell that express ganglionic types of nAChRs whose activation can be related to a functional response. While much is known about the outcome of functional activation of adrenal nAChRs, little work has been done in characterizing populations of nAChRs in adrenal chromaffin cells. These studies characterize the pharmacology and regulation of populations of nAChRs found in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. The primary findings of this research include 1) the characterization of an irreversible antagonist of adrenal nAChRs, 2) the discovery of spare nAChRs in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells, 3) the pharmacological characterization of mAb35 insensitive nAChRs which may account for as many as 45% of nAChRs in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells, 4) the finding that disulfide bonds do not play a critical role in the function of adrenal nAChRs which is contrary to their importance in other tissues, 5) the use of (+)-tubocurarine in a receptor protection assay ii to identify a subpopulation of nAChRs, 6) the characterization of the role of protein synthesis, glycosylation, and phosphorylation in the turnover of nAChRs, and 7) the identification and partial sequencing of a bovine β4 nAChR transcript expressed in adrenal chromaffin cells. iii This work is dedicated to Amelia Elisabeth Wenger, whose mere possibility allowed me to finish what I had started. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to sincerely thank Dr. Dennis McKay who guided me through this long process and never gave up on me even when I disappeared into another profession. I can not overstate the importance of the love of my wonderful wife Jane and my family in the completion of this long task. Their interest, support, understanding, and, yes, even nagging pushed me the rest of the way through. Finally, I would also like to thank the excellent staff of the College of Pharmacy and my dissertation committee, Dr. R. Thomas Boyd, Dr. Popat N. Patil, and Dr. Lane J. Wallace, for teaching me the nuances of this amazing science and for allowing me to complete my studies. v VITA December 28, 1966……………………….. Born – Tiffin, Ohio December, 1989…………………………... BA. Chemistry, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio September 1993 – September 1996………. Graduate Teaching Assistant, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio September 1996 – September 1997 Presidential Fellow, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio August 1999 – present Chemistry Teacher, Westland High School, South Western City Schools, Columbus, Ohio PUBLICATIONS 1. Maurer, J. A., Wenger, B. W., Guan, Z., Stokes, B. T. and McKay, D. B.: Staurosporine affects calcium homeostasis in cultured bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 288: 163-172, 1995. 2. Maurer, J. A., Wenger, B. W. and McKay, D. B.: Effects of protein kinase inhibitors on morphology and function of cultured bovine adrenal chromaffin cells: KN- 62 inhibits secretory function by blocking stimulated Ca2+ entry. J. Neurochem. 66: 105- 113, 1996. 3. Gu, H., Wenger, B. W., Lopez, I., McKay, S. B., Boyd, R. T. and McKay, D. B.: Characterization and localization of adrenal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: evidence that mAb35-nicotinic receptors are the principle receptors mediating adrenal catecholamine secretion. J. Neurochem. 66: 1454-1461, 1996. 4. Wenger, B. W., Bryant, D. L., Boyd, R. T. and McKay, D. B.: Evidence for spare nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and a ß4 subunit in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells: studies using bromoacetylcholine, epibatidine, cytisine, and mAb35. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 281: 905-913, 1997. 5. Free, R. B., Wenger, B. W., McKay, D. B.: Effects of sulfhydryl modifications of adrenal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Disulfide integrity is not essential for activation. Life Sciences 68: 373-385, 2000. vi 6. Free, R. B., and McKay, D. B.: Receptor protection studies to characterize neuronal nicotinic receptors: tubocurarine prevents alkylation of adrenal nicotinic receptors. Brain Research 891: 176-184, 2001. 7. Wenger, B. W., Boyd, R. T. and McKay, D. B.: Evidence that phosphorylation events and protein synthesis are important in nAChR turnover in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 22: 1523, 1996. 8. Wenger, B.W., Boyd, R. T., and McKay, D. B.: Evidence for a nicotinic acetycholine receptor reserve in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. Pharmacologist 39: 55, 1997. FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Pharmacy vii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………….ii. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS……………………………………………………………....v. VITA……………………………………………………………………………………vi. LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………………x. LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………..xi. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM……………………………………………………1 CHAPTERS 1. Introduction 1.1 Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in health and disease………………………..4 1.2 nAChR diversity………………………………………………………………..6 1.3 nAChR Subunit Structure………………………………………………………7 1.4 Neuronal nAChR Subtypes…………………………………………………….9 1.5 Heterogeneous Population of Neuronal nAChRs……………………………..13 1.6 Biochemical Regulation of nAChRs………………………………………….13 1.7 Adrenal nAChRs………………………………………………………………20 2. Materials and methods 2.1 Materials………………………………………………………………………23 2.2 Isolation and primary culture of bovine adrenal chromaffin cells……………24 2.3 Catecholamine secretion studies……………………………………………..27 viii 2.4 Alkylation of nAChRs………………………………………………………..28 2.5 Isolation and purification of mAb35…………………………………………29 2.6 Reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction (RT/PCR), cloning, sequencing and Northern analysis………………………………………………………..29 2.7 Calculations and Statistics…………………………………………………..32 3. Results 3.1 Alkylation of adrenal nAChRs………………………………………………33 3.2 Identification of a nAChR reserve…………………………………………..38 3.3 Identification of nAChR subpopulations using monoclonal antibodies…….44 3.4 Identification of nAChR subpopulations using receptor protection assays…53 3.5 Effects of disulfide bond reduction on nAChR pharmacology……………..65 3.6 Biochemical regulation of nAChR turnover………………………………..75 3.7 Identification of nAChR subunits…………………………………………..85 4. Discussion 4.1 Adrenal chromaffin cells contain spare receptors………………………….89 4.2 Receptor protection assays detect a subpopulation of nAChRs……………96 4.3 Disulfide integrity is not required for nAChR function…………………..100 4.4 Protein synthesis, glycosylation and phosphorylation are important in nAChR turnover…………………………………………………………………...103 4.5 β4 subunits are expresses in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells……………108 BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………………110 ix LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Changes in EC50 values and Emax values of several nAChR agonists after brACh treatment……………………………………………………….43 Table 2. Changes in EC50 values and Emax values of several nAChR agonists after mAb35 treatment………………………………………………………50 Table 3. Sensitivity of residual adrenal nAChRs to nAChR antagonists after mAb35-induced nAChR modulation………………………………….51 Table 4. Ability of nAChR inhibitors to protect nAChRs from alkylation: studies using intermediate and low concentrations of brACh for alkylation….61 Table 5. Pharmacology of tubocurarine-protected nAChRs……………………64 Table 6. Effects of DTT pretreatment on the affinity of nAChR inhibitors……67 Table 7. EC50 and Emax values for agonists after treatment with DTT…………74 x LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. BrACh-induced stimulation of bovine adrenal nAChRs: concentration- dependent effects………………………………………………………...35 Figure 2. BrACh-induced inactivation of bovine adrenal nAChRs: concentration- dependent effects………………………………………………………..36 Figure 3. Time course for recovery from the inhibitory effects of brACh on adrenal catecholamine release……………………………………………………37 Figure 4. The concentration-response effects of nicotine after brACh-induced nAChR inactivation……………………………………………………...40 Figure 5. The concentration-response effects of epibatidine after brACh-induced nAChR inactivation……………………………………………………...41 Figure 6. The concentration-response effects of cytisine after brACh-induced nAChR inactivation……………………………………………………...42 Figure 7. The concentration-response effects of nicotine after mAb35-induced nAChR modulation………………………………………………………47 Figure 8. The concentration-response effects of cytisine after mAb35-induced nAChR modulation………………………………………………………48 Figure 9. The concentration-response effects of cytisine after mAb35-induced nAChR modulation………………………………………………………49 Figure 10. Effects of submaximal concentrations of brACh on mAb35 insensitive nAChRs………………………………………………………………….52 Figure 11. Ability of nAChR inhibitors to protect nAChRs from alkylation using 30 µM brACh………………………………………………………………..57
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Use of Chemical Chelators As Reversal Agents for Drug
    (19) TZZ_ _ZZZ_T (11) EP 1 210 090 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: A61K 31/724 (2006.01) A61K 31/194 (2006.01) 18.06.2014 Bulletin 2014/25 A61P 39/04 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 00964006.1 (86) International application number: PCT/EP2000/007694 (22) Date of filing: 07.08.2000 (87) International publication number: WO 2001/012202 (22.02.2001 Gazette 2001/08) (54) USE OF CHEMICAL CHELATORS AS REVERSAL AGENTS FOR DRUG- INDUCED NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCK VERWENDUNG VON CHEMISCHEN CHELATOREN ZUR UMKEHRUNG VON PHARMAKOLOGISCH-INDUZIERTER NEUROMUSKULÄRER BLOCKIERUNG UTILISATION D’AGENTS CHIMIQUES CHELATANTS COMME AGENTS DE NEUTRALISATION DU BLOCAGE NEUROMUSCULAIRE PROVOQUE PAR DES MEDICAMENTS (84) Designated Contracting States: (56) References cited: AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU AU-A- 3 662 895 MC NL PT SE • B DESIRE: "Inactivaton of sarin and soman by (30) Priority: 13.08.1999 EP 99306411 cyclodextrins in vitro" EXPERIENTIA, vol. 43, no. 4, 1987, pages 395-397, XP000907287 (43) Date of publication of application: • B. DESIRE: "Interaction of soman with beta- 05.06.2002 Bulletin 2002/23 cyclodextrin" FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, vol. 7, no. 4, 1986, pages 647-657, (73) Proprietor: Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. XP000911170 2031 BN Haarlem (NL) • C. MAY: "Development of a toxin-binding agent as a treatment for tunicamycinuracil toxicity: (72) Inventors: protection against tunicamycin poisoning of • BOM, Antonius, Helena, Adolf sheep" AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, Ratho, Midlothian EH28 8NY (GB) vol. 76, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Muscle Relaxants Physiologic and Pharmacologic Aspects
    K. Fukushima • R. Ochiai (Eds.) Muscle Relaxants Physiologic and Pharmacologic Aspects With 125 Figures Springer Contents Preface V List of Contributors XVII 1. History of Muscle Relaxants Some Early Approaches to Relaxation in the United Kingdom J.P. Payne 3 The Final Steps Leading to the Anesthetic Use of Muscle Relaxants F.F. Foldes 8 History of Muscle Relaxants in Japan K. Iwatsuki 13 2. The Neuromuscular Junctions - Update Mechanisms of Action of Reversal Agents W.C. Bowman 19 Nicotinic Receptors F.G. Standaert 31 The Neuromuscular Junction—Basic Receptor Pharmacology J.A. Jeevendra Martyn 37 Muscle Contraction and Calcium Ion M. Endo 48 3. Current Basic Experimental Works Related to Neuromuscular Blockade in Present and Future Prejunctional Actions of Neuromuscular Blocking Drugs I.G. Marshall, C. Prior, J. Dempster, and L. Tian 51 VII VIII Approaches to Short-Acting Neuromuscular Blocking Agents J.B. Stenlake 62 Effects Other than Relaxation of Non-Depolarizing Muscle Relaxants E.S. Vizi 67 Regulation of Innervation-Related Properties of Cultured Skeletal Muscle Cells by Transmitter and Co-Transmitters R.H. Henning 82 4. Current Clinical Experimental Works Related to Neuromuscular Blockade in Present and Future Where Should Experimental Works Be Conducted? R.D. Miller 93 Muscle Relaxants in the Intensive Care Unit ! J.E. Caldwell 95 New Relaxants in the Operating Room R.K. Mirakhur 105 Kinetic-Dynamic Modelling of Neuromuscular Blockade C. Shanks Ill 5. Basic Aspects of Neuromuscular Junction Physiology of the Neuromuscular Junction W.C. Bowman 117 Properties of <x7-Containing Acetylcholine Receptors and Their Expression in Both Neurons and Muscle D.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Muscle Relaxants Femoral Arteriography.,,>
    IN THIS ISSUE: , .:t.i ". Muscle Relaxants fI, \'.' \., Femoral ArteriographY.,,> University of Minnesota Medical Bulletin Editor ROBERT B. HOWARD, M.D. Associate Editors RAY M. AMBERG GILBERT S. CAMPBELL, M.D. ELLIS S. BENSON, MD. BYRON B. COCHRANE, M.D. E. B. BROWN, PhD. RICHARD T. SMITH, M.D. WESLEY W. SPINK, MD. University of Minnesota Medical School J. 1. MORRILL, President, University of Minnesota HAROLD S. DIEHL, MD., Dean, College of Medical SciencBs WILLIAM F. MALONEY, M.D., Assistant Dean N. 1. GAULT, JR., MD., Assistant Dean University Hospitals RAY M. AMBERG, Director Minnesota Medical Foundation WESLEY W. SPINK, M.D., President R. S. YLVISAKER, MD., Vice-President ROBERT B. HOWARD, M.D., Secretary-Treasurer Minnesota Medical Alumni Association BYRON B. COCHRANE, M.D., President VIRGIL J. P. LUNDQUIST, M.D., First Vice-President SHELDON M. LAGAARD, MD., Second Vice-President LEONARD A. BOROWICZ, M.D., Secretary JAMES C. MANKEY, M.D., Treasurer UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Medical Bulletin OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA HOSPITALS, MINNE· SOTA MEDICAL FOUNDATION, AND MINNESOTA MEDICAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION VOLUME XXVIII December 1, 1956 NUMBER 4 CONTENTS STAFF MEETING REPORTS Current Status of Muscle Relaxants BY J. Albert Jackson, MD., J. H. Matthews, M.D., J. J. Buckley, M.D., D.S.P. Weatherhead, M.D., AND F. H. Van Bergen, M.D. 114 Small Vessel Changes in Femoral Arteriography BY Alexander R. Margulis, M.D. AND T. O. Murphy, MD.__ 123 EDITORIALS .. - -. - ---__ __ _ 132 MEDICAL SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ----------- 133 POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION - 135 COMING EVENTS 136 PIIb1ished semi.monthly from October 15 to JUDe 15 at Minneapolis, Minnesota.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacological Studies on Pupillary Reflex Dilatation
    PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDIES ON PUPILLARY REFLEX DILATATION SHINJI OONO Departmentof Pharmacology,Faculty of Medicine,Kyushu University, Fukuoka Received for publication September 20, 1964 Concerning the role of sympathetic and parasympathetic mechanisms in reflex dilatation of the pupil elicited by painful stimuli, there have long been many argu ments. One group of authors, for example, Bechterew (1) and Braunstein (2) concluded that the pupillary dilatation resulting from painful stimuli was caused solely by inhibi tion of the third cranial nerve activity. Another group of investigators, for example, Lieben and Kahn (3), Bain, Irving and McSwiney (4), Ury and Gellhorn (5), Ury and Oldberg (6) and Seybold and Moore (7) were of the opinion that parasympathetic in hibition was the principal factor in the reflex dilatation while sympathetic excitation was a negligible one. On the contrary, others, for instance, Luchsinger (8), Anderson (9), and Dechaume (10) claimed that sympathetic excitation was responsible for the pupillary reaction which was absent after cervical sympathectomy. Weinstein and Bender (11) compared the pupillary reflex activity in cats and mon keys. They concluded that a species-difference exists: in both species pupillary dilata tion is accomplished by both parasympathetic inhibitory and sympathetic excitatory mechanism. In the cat, inhibition of the parasympathetic mechanism is predominant while in the monkey excitation of the sympathetic mechanism is of greater importance . Later Lowenstein and Loewenfeld (12) performed more detailed experiments in cats using their own pupillographic instrument; they observed that pupillary reflex dilata tion was mostly due to sympathetic excitation, and was reduced to less than one-fifth of the normal control dilatation after sympathectomy.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 7,265,099 B1 Born Et A1
    US007265099B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 7,265,099 B1 Born et a1. (45) Date of Patent: *Sep. 4, 2007 (54) USE OF CHEMICAL CHELATORS AS Tarver, G. et al “2-O-Substituted cyclodextrins as reversal REVERSAL AGENTS FOR DRUG-INDUCED agents . ” Bioorg. Med. Chem. (2002) vol. 10, pp 1819-1827.* NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCK Zhang, M. “Drug-speci?c cyclodextrins . ” Drugs of the Future (2003) vol. 28, no 4, pp 347-354.* (75) Inventors: Antonius Helena Adolf Bom, Lee, C. “Structure, conformation, and action of neuromuscular Midlothian (GB); Alan William Muir, blocking drugs” Brit. J. Anesth. (2001) vol. 87, no 5, pp 755-769.* Lanark (GB); David Rees, Gothenburg B Desire: “Inactivation of sarin and soman by cyclodextrins in (SE) vitro” EXPERIENTIA, vol. 43, No. 4, 1987, pp. 395-397. B. Desire: “Interaction of soman with beta-cyclodextrin” Funda (73) Assignee: Organon N.V., Oss (NL) mental and Applied Toxicology, vol. 7, No. 4, 1986, pp. 647-657. ( * ) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this C. May: “Development of a toxin-bindng agent as a treatment for patent is extended or adjusted under 35 tunicamycinuracil toxicity: protection against tunicamycin poison U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. ing of sheep” Australian Veterinary Journal, vol. 76, No. 11, 1998 pp. 752-756. This patent is subject to a terminal dis K. Uekama: “Effects of cyclodextrins on chlorpromaZine-induced claimer. haemolysis and nervous systems responses” J. Pharm. Pharmacol., vol. 33, No. 11, 1981, pp. 707-710. (21) Appl. No.: 10/049,393 T. Irie: “Protective mechanism of beta-cyclodextrin for the hemolysis induced With phenothiazine neuroleptics in vitro” J.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuronal Nicotinic Receptors
    NEURONAL NICOTINIC RECEPTORS Dr Christopher G V Sharples and preparations lend themselves to physiological and pharmacological investigations, and there followed a Professor Susan Wonnacott period of intense study of the properties of nAChR- mediating transmission at these sites. nAChRs at the Department of Biology and Biochemistry, muscle endplate and in sympathetic ganglia could be University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK distinguished by their respective preferences for C10 and C6 polymethylene bistrimethylammonium Susan Wonnacott is Professor of compounds, notably decamethonium and Neuroscience and Christopher Sharples is a hexamethonium,5 providing the first hint of diversity post-doctoral research officer within the among nAChRs. Department of Biology and Biochemistry at Biochemical approaches to elucidate the structure the University of Bath. Their research and function of the nAChR protein in the 1970’s were focuses on understanding the molecular and facilitated by the abundance of nicotinic synapses cellular events underlying the effects of akin to the muscle endplate, in electric organs of the acute and chronic nicotinic receptor electric ray,Torpedo , and eel, Electrophorus . High stimulation. This is with the goal of affinity snakea -toxins, principallyaa -bungarotoxin ( - Bgt), enabled the nAChR protein to be purified, and elucidating the structure, function and subsequently resolved into 4 different subunits regulation of neuronal nicotinic receptors. designateda ,bg , and d .6 An additional subunit, e , was subsequently identified in adult muscle. In the early 1980’s, these subunits were cloned and sequenced, The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) arguably and the era of the molecular analysis of the nAChR has the longest history of experimental study of any commenced.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Muscle Relaxants
    i ,I .. / ,""- Clinical Pharmacokinetics 2: 330-343 (1977) © ADIS Press 1977 Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Muscle Relaxants L.B. Wingard and DR. Cook Departments of Pharmacology and Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania SUl1lmary Muscle relaxants are commonly used as an adjunct to general anaesthesia and to facilitate ventilator care in the intensive care unit. The muscle relaxants are unique in that the degree of neurol1luscular blockade can be directly measured. Thus, for some of the muscle relaxants it is possible to correlate the degree of neuromuscular blockade with the plasma concentration of drug. This quantilalive pllGrmacokinelic approach has been applied primarily to d­ tubocurarine and to a lesser extent to suxamethonium (succinylcholine), gallamine and pan­ curoniul1l. The pharl1lacokinetic information for the other relaxants is mostly descriptive and incomplete. The variation in drug concentration over time is in.fluenced by the distribution, metabolism and excretion of drug. Metabolism by plasma cholinesterase plays a maJor role in the termina­ tion (~f action of suxamethonium. Although pancuronium is partly metabolised its major metabolites have moderate pharmacological activity. The other relaxants are excreted through the kidney. For gallamine and dimethyl-tubocurarine, renal excretion appears to be the only means qf eliinination. However, biliary excretion probably provides an alternative route of elimination for d-tubocurarine and pancuronium. In patients with impaired renal function the duration qf neuromusClilar blockade may be markedly prolonged following standard doses of gallamine or dimethyl-tubocurarine, may be slightly prolonged following standard doses of pancumnium, and is near normal following standard doses qf d-tubocurarine. Following large or repeated doses q(pancuronium or d-tubocurarine, the duration q{ neuromuscular blockade may be markedly prolonged.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacology of Ophthalmologically Important Drugs James L
    Henry Ford Hospital Medical Journal Volume 13 | Number 2 Article 8 6-1965 Pharmacology Of Ophthalmologically Important Drugs James L. Tucker Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.henryford.com/hfhmedjournal Part of the Chemicals and Drugs Commons, Life Sciences Commons, Medical Specialties Commons, and the Public Health Commons Recommended Citation Tucker, James L. (1965) "Pharmacology Of Ophthalmologically Important Drugs," Henry Ford Hospital Medical Bulletin : Vol. 13 : No. 2 , 191-222. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.henryford.com/hfhmedjournal/vol13/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Henry Ford Health System Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Henry Ford Hospital Medical Journal by an authorized editor of Henry Ford Health System Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Henry Ford Hosp. Med. Bull. Vol. 13, June, 1965 PHARMACOLOGY OF OPHTHALMOLOGICALLY IMPORTANT DRUGS JAMES L. TUCKER, JR., M.D. DRUG THERAPY IN ophthalmology, like many specialties in medicine, encompasses the entire spectrum of pharmacology. This is true for any specialty that routinely involves the care of young and old patients, surgical and non-surgical problems, local eye disease (topical or subconjunctival drug administration), and systemic disease which must be treated in order to "cure" the "local" manifestations which frequently present in the eyes (uveitis, optic neurhis, etc.). Few authors (see bibliography) have attempted an introduction to drug therapy oriented specifically for the ophthalmologist. The new resident in ophthalmology often has a vague concept of the importance of this subject, and with that in mind this paper was prepared.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
    nAChR Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors nAChRs (nicotinic acetylcholine receptors) are neuron receptor proteins that signal for muscular contraction upon a chemical stimulus. They are cholinergic receptors that form ligand-gated ion channels in the plasma membranes of certain neurons and on the presynaptic and postsynaptic sides of theneuromuscular junction. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are the best-studied of the ionotropic receptors. Like the other type of acetylcholine receptor-the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR)-the nAChR is triggered by the binding of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh). Just as muscarinic receptors are named such because they are also activated by muscarine, nicotinic receptors can be opened not only by acetylcholine but also by nicotine —hence the name "nicotinic". www.MedChemExpress.com 1 nAChR Inhibitors & Modulators (+)-Sparteine (-)-(S)-B-973B Cat. No.: HY-W008350 Cat. No.: HY-114269 Bioactivity: (+)-Sparteine is a natural alkaloid acting as a ganglionic Bioactivity: (-)-(S)-B-973B is a potent allosteric agonist and positive blocking agent. (+)-Sparteine competitively blocks nicotinic allosteric modulator of α7 nAChR, with antinociceptive ACh receptor in the neurons. activity [1]. Purity: 98.0% Purity: 99.93% Clinical Data: No Development Reported Clinical Data: No Development Reported Size: 10mM x 1mL in Water, Size: 10mM x 1mL in DMSO, 100 mg 5 mg, 10 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg (±)-Epibatidine A-867744 (CMI 545) Cat. No.: HY-101078 Cat. No.: HY-12149 Bioactivity: (±)-Epibatidine is a nicotinic agonist. (±)-Epibatidine is a Bioactivity: A-867744 is a positive allosteric modulator of α7 nAChRs (IC50 neuronal nAChR agonist. values are 0.98 and 1.12 μM for human and rat α7 receptor ACh-evoked currents respectively, in X.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Approximation of the Laws of the Member States Relating to Cosmetic Products (76/768/EEC )
    27 . 9 . 76 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 262/169 COUNCIL DIRECTIVE of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products (76/768/EEC ) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, regards the composition, labelling and packaging of cosmetic products ; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the Euro­ pean Economic Community, and in particular Whereas this Directive relates only to cosmetic prod­ Article 100 thereof, ucts and not to pharmaceutical specialities and medicinal products ; whereas for this purpose it is necessary to define the scope of the Directive by Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, delimiting the field of cosmetics from that of phar­ maceuticals ; whereas this delimitation follows in particular from the detailed definition of cosmetic Having regard to the opinion of the European Parlia­ products, which refers both to their areas of appli­ ment ( 1 ), cation and to the purposes of their use; whereas this Directive is not applicable to the products that fall Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and under the definition of cosmetic product but are Social Committee (2 ), exclusively intended to protect from disease; whereas, moreover, it is advisable to specify that certain prod­ ucts come under this definition, whilst products Whereas the provisions laid down by law, regulation containing substances or preparations intended to be or administrative action in force in the Member ingested, inhaled, injected or implanted in the human States
    [Show full text]
  • Drug and Medication Classification Schedule
    KENTUCKY HORSE RACING COMMISSION UNIFORM DRUG, MEDICATION, AND SUBSTANCE CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE KHRC 8-020-1 (11/2018) Class A drugs, medications, and substances are those (1) that have the highest potential to influence performance in the equine athlete, regardless of their approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or (2) that lack approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration but have pharmacologic effects similar to certain Class B drugs, medications, or substances that are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Acecarbromal Bolasterone Cimaterol Divalproex Fluanisone Acetophenazine Boldione Citalopram Dixyrazine Fludiazepam Adinazolam Brimondine Cllibucaine Donepezil Flunitrazepam Alcuronium Bromazepam Clobazam Dopamine Fluopromazine Alfentanil Bromfenac Clocapramine Doxacurium Fluoresone Almotriptan Bromisovalum Clomethiazole Doxapram Fluoxetine Alphaprodine Bromocriptine Clomipramine Doxazosin Flupenthixol Alpidem Bromperidol Clonazepam Doxefazepam Flupirtine Alprazolam Brotizolam Clorazepate Doxepin Flurazepam Alprenolol Bufexamac Clormecaine Droperidol Fluspirilene Althesin Bupivacaine Clostebol Duloxetine Flutoprazepam Aminorex Buprenorphine Clothiapine Eletriptan Fluvoxamine Amisulpride Buspirone Clotiazepam Enalapril Formebolone Amitriptyline Bupropion Cloxazolam Enciprazine Fosinopril Amobarbital Butabartital Clozapine Endorphins Furzabol Amoxapine Butacaine Cobratoxin Enkephalins Galantamine Amperozide Butalbital Cocaine Ephedrine Gallamine Amphetamine Butanilicaine Codeine
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceuticals As Environmental Contaminants
    PharmaceuticalsPharmaceuticals asas EnvironmentalEnvironmental Contaminants:Contaminants: anan OverviewOverview ofof thethe ScienceScience Christian G. Daughton, Ph.D. Chief, Environmental Chemistry Branch Environmental Sciences Division National Exposure Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development Environmental Protection Agency Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 [email protected] Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada Why and how do drugs contaminate the environment? What might it all mean? How do we prevent it? Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada This talk presents only a cursory overview of some of the many science issues surrounding the topic of pharmaceuticals as environmental contaminants Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada A Clarification We sometimes loosely (but incorrectly) refer to drugs, medicines, medications, or pharmaceuticals as being the substances that contaminant the environment. The actual environmental contaminants, however, are the active pharmaceutical ingredients – APIs. These terms are all often used interchangeably Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada Office of Research and Development Available: http://www.epa.gov/nerlesd1/chemistry/pharma/image/drawing.pdfNational
    [Show full text]