Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology Editors: Damian Ballam Msc and Allister Vale MD
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology Editors: Damian Ballam MSc and Allister Vale MD January 2016 CONTENTS General Toxicology 8 Metals 38 Management 20 Pesticides 40 Drugs 22 Chemical Warfare 42 Chemical Incidents & 33 Plants 43 Pollution Chemicals 34 Animals 44 CURRENT AWARENESS PAPERS OF THE MONTH Sea-dumped chemical weapons: environmental risk, occupational hazard Greenberg MI, Sexton KJ, Vearrier D. Clin Toxicol 2015; online early: doi: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1121272: Introduction Chemical weapons dumped into the ocean for disposal in the twentieth century pose a continuing environmental and human health risk. Objective In this review we discuss locations, quantity, and types of sea-dumped chemical weapons, related environmental concerns, and human encounters with sea-dumped chemical weapons. Methods We utilized the Ovid (http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com) and PubMed (http://www.pubmed.org) search engines to perform MEDLINE searches for the terms 'sea-dumped chemical weapons', 'chemical warfare agents', and 'chemical munitions'. The searches returned 5863 articles. Irrelevant and non-English articles were excluded. A review of the references for these articles yielded additional relevant sources, with a total of 64 peer-reviewed articles cited in this paper. History and geography of chemical weapons dumping at sea Hundreds of thousands of tons of chemical munitions were disposed off at sea following Current Awareness in Clinical Toxicology is produced monthly for the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology by the Birmingham Unit of the UK National Poisons Information Service, with contributions from the Cardiff, Edinburgh, and Newcastle Units. The NPIS is commissioned by Public Health England 2 World War II. European, Russian, Japanese, and United States coasts are the areas most affected worldwide. Several areas in the Baltic and North Seas suffered concentrated large levels of dumping, and these appear to be the world's most studied chemical warfare agent marine dumping areas. Chemical warfare agents Sulfur mustard, Lewisite, and the nerve agents appear to be the chemical warfare agents most frequently disposed off at sea. Multiple other type of agents including organoarsenicals, blood agents, choking agents, and lacrimators were dumped at sea, although in lesser volumes. Environmental concerns Numerous geohydrologic variables contribute to the rate of release of chemical agents from their original casings, leading to difficult and inexact modeling of risk of release into seawater. Sulfur mustard and the organoarsenicals are the most environmentally persistent dumped chemical agents. Sulfur mustard in particular has a propensity to form a solid or semi-solid lump with a polymer coating of breakdown products, and can persist in this state on the ocean floor for decades. Rates of solubility and hydrolysis and levels of innate toxicity of a chemical agent are used to predict the risk to the marine environments. The organoarsenicals eventually breakdown into arsenic, and thus present an indefinite timeline for contamination. Generally, studies assaying sediment and water levels of parent chemical agents and breakdown products at dumpsites have found minimal amounts of relevant chemicals, although arsenic levels are typically higher in dumpsites than reference areas. Studies of marine organisms have not shown concerning amounts of chemical agents or breakdown products in tissue, but have shown evidence of chronic toxicity. There is believed to be minimal risk posed by seafood consumption. Microbiota assays of dumpsites are significantly altered in species composition compared to reference sites, which may imply unseen but significant changes to ecosystems of dumpsites. Human health concerns The major human health risk at this time appears to arise from acute exposure to an agent by either accidental recovery of a chemical weapon on a fishing vessel, or by munitions washed ashore onto beaches. Conclusions Improving technology continues to make the deep sea more accessible, thus increasing the risk of disturbing munitions lying on or buried in the seabed. Pipe laying, cable burying, drilling, scuba diving, trawling, and undersea scientific research are the activities posing the most risk. The long-term threat to the benthic habitat via increased arsenic concentrations, shifts in microbiota speciation, and chronic toxicity to vertebrates and invertebrates is not currently understood. The risk to the environment of massive release via disturbance remains a distinct possibility. Terrorist recovery and re-weaponization of chemical agents is a remote possibility. Full text available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2015.1115056 New regimens for intravenous acetylcysteine, where are we now? Bateman DN, Dear JW, Thomas SHL. Clin Toxicol 2015; online early: doi: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1121545: Acetylcysteine has been used as a treatment for paracetamol overdose as a 20.25- or 21-h infusion for nearly 40 years. These regimens give 50% of the dose in the first 15 min or 1 h, and are associated with high rates of adverse reactions. A randomised controlled trial has demonstrated that a shorter (12 h) and simpler (two infusions) acetylcysteine regimen using 3 a slower initial infusion rate produces lower rates of adverse events than the original 20.25- h regimen. However, this study was not sufficiently large to show therapeutic equivalence as a hepatoprotective therapy in paracetamol overdose. Two further studies are now reported, which also suggest lower rates of adverse reactions with lower initial rates of acetylcysteine administration. These modified regimens can now be accepted as better tolerated, but it is unlikely that a randomised study of sufficient size to demonstrate non-inferiority of any novel regimen would ever be funded. Against this background we suggest what can be done to establish the efficacy of these less toxic and potentially shorter alternative acetylcysteine regimens and to establish them into routine clinical use. Full text available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2015.1121545 A prospective observational study of a novel 2-phase infusion protocol for the administration of acetylcysteine in paracetamol poisoning Isbister GK, Downes MA, Mcnamara K, Berling I, Whyte IM, Page CB. Clin Toxicol 2015; online early: doi: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1115057: Context The current 3-phase acetylcysteine infusion for paracetamol poisoning delivers half the dose over 15-60 min and frequently results in adverse reactions. Objective We aimed to determine adverse reaction frequency with a modified 2-phase infusion protocol with a longer initial infusion. Materials and methods A prospective observational study of a modified 2-phase acetylcysteine protocol was undertaken at two hospitals. Acetylcysteine was commenced on admission and ceased if paracetamol concentrations were low-risk (below the nomogram line). The first infusion was 200 mg/kg over 4–9 h based on ingestion time or 4 h for staggered/chronic ingestions. The second infusion was 100 mg/kg over 16 h. Pre-defined outcomes were frequency of adverse reactions (systemic hypersensitivity reactions or gastrointestinal); proportion with alanine transaminase (ALT) > 1000 U/L or abnormal ALT. Results 654 paracetamol poisonings were treated with the new protocol; median age 29 y (15–98 y); 453 females; 576 acute and 78 staggered/chronic ingestions. In 420 (64%) acetylcysteine was stopped for low-risk paracetamol concentrations. An adverse reaction occurred in 229/654 admissions (35%; 95% CI: 31–39%): 173 (26.5%; 95% CI: 23–30%) only gastrointestinal, 50 (8%; 95% CI: 6–10%) skin only systemic hypersensitivity reactions; and three severe anaphylaxis (0.5%; 95% CI: 0.1–1.5%; all hypotension). Adverse reactions occurred in 111/231 (48%) receiving full treatment compared to 116/420 (28%) in whom the infusion was stopped early (absolute difference 20%; 95% CI: 13–28%; p < 0.0001). In 200 overdoses < 10 g, one had toxic paracetamol concentrations, but 53 developed reactions. Sixteen patients had an ALT > 1000 U/L and 24 an abnormal ALT attributable to paracetamol; all but one had treatment commenced >12 h post-ingestion. Conclusion A 2-phase acetylcysteine infusion protocol results in a fewer reactions in patients with toxic paracetamol concentrations, but is not justified in patients with low-risk paracetamol concentrations. Full text available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2015.1115057 4 Plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a predictive biomarker for the detection of acute kidney injury in adult poisoning Ahn JY, Lee MJ, Seo JS, Choi D, Park JB. Clin Toxicol 2015; online early: doi: 10.3109/15563650.2015.1118487: Context Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a serious complication in intoxicated patients. Recently, a new biomarker - neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) - was used to predict AKI in patients who were critically ill or had sepsis. Objective To evaluate the utility of plasma NGAL as an early predictor of AKI in adults with acute poisoning. Materials and methods This retrospective, observational, cohort study was conducted between December 2013 and November 2014. A total of 157 consecutive adult patients who presented to the emergency department (Level 1 regional center) of Kyungpook National University Hospital, a tertiary teaching hospital in Daegu, Korea, within 24 h of poisoning were included. Initial plasma NGAL levels and laboratory parameters were concurrently measured upon hospital arrival. AKI was defined according to Acute