• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Issue 357 of Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin 2 July 2018 Issue number 357 2 July 2018 Issue 357 of Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin 2 July 2018 Contents Introduction 3 Broadcast Standards cases In Breach Rob Jones Show Time 107.5, 13 March 2018, 20:35 6 Point of View Channel 44, 4 and 11 December 2017, 17:00 8 Suddenly It’s Spring That’s Oxford, 17 March 2018, 11:20 23 35 minutes Abu Dhabi Channel, 5 February 2018, 00:35 26 North East Live Made in Tyne and Wear, 30 March 2018, 18:20 36 Indian Law KTV, 14 January 2018, 19:30 39 Advertising minutage FreeSports, various dates and times between 14 March 2018 and 23 April 2018 43 Resolved Mid Mornings Talk Radio, 8 March 2018, 10:00 45 Broadcast Licence Conditions cases Resolved Provision of information: Local TV annual returns data Various licensees 49 Tables of cases Investigations Not in Breach 51 Complaints assessed, not investigated 52 Complaints outside of remit 59 Issue 357 of Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin 2 July 2018 BBC First 60 Investigations List 62 Issue 357 of Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin 2 July 2018 Introduction Under the Communications Act 2003 (“the Act”), Ofcom has a duty to set standards for broadcast content to secure the standards objectives1. Ofcom also has a duty to ensure that On Demand Programme Services (“ODPS”) comply with certain standards requirements set out in the Act2. Ofcom reflects these requirements in its codes and rules. The Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin reports on the outcome of Ofcom’s investigations into alleged breaches of its codes and rules, as well as conditions with which broadcasters licensed by Ofcom are required to comply. The codes and rules include: a) Ofcom’s Broadcasting Code (“the Code”) for content broadcast on television and radio services licensed by Ofcom, and for content on the BBC’s licence fee funded television, radio and on demand services. b) the Code on the Scheduling of Television Advertising (“COSTA”), containing rules on how much advertising and teleshopping may be scheduled on commercial television, how many breaks are allowed and when they may be taken. c) certain sections of the BCAP Code: the UK Code of Broadcast Advertising, for which Ofcom retains regulatory responsibility for television and radio services. These include: • the prohibition on ‘political’ advertising; • ‘participation TV’ advertising, e.g. long-form advertising predicated on premium rate telephone services – notably chat (including ‘adult’ chat), ‘psychic’ readings and dedicated quiz TV (Call TV quiz services); and • gambling, dating and ‘message board’ material where these are broadcast as advertising3. d) other conditions with which Ofcom licensed services must comply, such as requirements to pay fees and submit information required for Ofcom to carry out its statutory duties. Further information can be found on Ofcom’s website for television and radio licences. e) Ofcom’s Statutory Rules and Non-Binding Guidance for Providers of On-Demand Programme Services for editorial content on ODPS (apart from BBC ODPS). Ofcom considers sanctions for advertising content on ODPS referred to it by the Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”), the co-regulator of ODPS for advertising, or may do so as a concurrent regulator. Other codes and requirements may also apply to broadcasters, depending on their circumstances. These include the requirements in the BBC Agreement, the Code on Television Access Services (which sets out how much subtitling, signing and audio description relevant licensees must provide), the Code on Electronic Programme Guides, the Code on Listed Events, and the Cross Promotion Code. 1 The relevant legislation is set out in detail in Annex 1 of the Code. 2 The relevant legislation can be found at Part 4A of the Act. 3 BCAP and ASA continue to regulate conventional teleshopping content and spot advertising for these types of services where it is permitted. Ofcom remains responsible for statutory sanctions in all advertising cases. 4 Issue 357 of Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin 2 July 2018 It is Ofcom’s policy to describe fully television, radio and on demand content. Some of the language and descriptions used in Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin may therefore cause offence. 5 Issue 357 of Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin 2 July 2018 Broadcast Standards cases In Breach Rob Jones Show Time 107.5, 13 March 2018, 20:35 Introduction Time 107.5 is a commercial radio station licensed to provide a service of broad music, information and news in the London Borough of Havering and the immediate area. The Licence for the service is held by Lyca Media II Limited (“Lyca” or “the Licensee”). The Rob Jones show is broadcast on Tuesdays between 20:00 and 22:00. Ofcom received a complaint about offensive language in the music track Tribute by Tenacious D, broadcast at approximately 20:35. This song lyrics included two instances of the word “motherfucker” and one instance of the word “fuck”. Ofcom considered the material raised issues under Rule 2.3 of the Code: Rule 2.3: “In applying generally accepted standards broadcasters must ensure the material which may cause offence is justified by the context…”. Ofcom requested comments from the Licensee about how the content complied with this rule. Response Lyca said that it could not “justify the use of the song”. It explained that the presenter responsible for playing the track sourced it from the internet and did not realise that the song contained offensive language. The Licensee added that playing music from the internet was against the station’s protocols. The Licensee said that the presenter broadcast an apology in his show the week following the incident. In addition, it said it had “re-enforced [its] style guide to all [its] team and will continue to re-enforce this on a regular basis as a constant reminder never to make this error again”. Decision Reflecting our duties under the Communications Act 20031, Section Two of the Code requires that generally accepted standards are applied to provide adequate protection for members of the public from the inclusion of offensive and harmful material in programmes. Rule 2.3 requires broadcasters to ensure that the broadcast of potentially offensive material is justified by the context. Context includes for example: the editorial content of the programme, the service on which it is broadcast, the time of broadcast and the likely size and composition of the potential audience and the likely expectation of the audience. 1 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/section/319 6 Issue 357 of Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin 2 July 2018 Ofcom’s research on offensive language2 indicates that the words “motherfucker” and “fuck” are considered by audiences to be among the most offensive language. The use of the words in this case clearly had the potential to cause offence to the audience. Ofcom therefore considered whether the content was justified by the context. Our guidance on offensive language3 in radio states that: “In reaching any decision about compliance with the Code, Ofcom will take into account the likely audience expectations of a particular radio station at the time of broadcast”. In our view, the majority of listeners to a local commercial radio station playing a broad range of music would be unlikely to expect programmes to contain the most offensive language at the time this song was broadcast. Ofcom’s Decision is that the broadcast was in breach of Rule 2.3 of the Code. Breach of Rule 2.3 2 https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0022/91624/OfcomOffensiveLanguage.pdf 3 https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/40541/offensive-language.pdf 7 Issue 357 of Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin 2 July 2018 In Breach Point of View Channel 44, 4 and 11 December 2017, 17:00 Introduction Channel 44 is a cable and satellite channel that broadcasts Urdu language news and current affairs programmes. The licence for the service is held by City News Network (SMC) Pvt Ltd (“the Licensee”). We received three complaints about two episodes of Point of View, a current affairs discussion programme made in Pakistan and broadcast in the UK on Channel 44. The programme is presented by Dr Danish, a well-known Pakistani television presenter and journalist. The complainants alleged that the programme incited hatred towards the Ahmadiyya community. The Ahmadi movement identifies itself as a Muslim movement which follows the teachings of the Qur’an. However, it is widely regarded as heretical by orthodox Islam since it differs in its interpretation of the finality of prophethood. There are Ahmadiyya communities around the world. They face restrictions in many Muslim countries and are described in publicly available reports as one of the most persecuted communities in Pakistan1. There have also been reports of discrimination and threats against the community in the UK2. The programmes discussed the resurfacing of a 2010 video in which Rana Sanaullah, the Provincial Law Minister in the Punjab Government, was interviewed on the Ahmadiyya television channel MTA. Clips of this interview were used in the 4 December episode of Point of View. In these clips, Mr Sanaullah made a number of remarks that appeared conciliatory towards the Ahmadiyya community. This led to calls from some orthodox Muslims for Mr Sanaullah to resign from his government position on the grounds that his comments amounted to blasphemy. As the programme was in Urdu, Ofcom prepared an English translation of the material and gave the Licensee an opportunity to comment on the accuracy of the translation.

Load more

  63

Copy Link