Evelyn Jean Buchinger Revocable Living Trust STATE of MICHIGAN COURT of APPEALS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Every month I summarize the most important probate cases in Michigan. Now I publish my summaries as a service to colleagues and friends. I hope you find these summaries useful and I am always interested in hearing thoughts and opinions on these cases. PROBATE LAW CASE SUMMARY BY: Alan A. May Alan May is a shareholder who is sought after for his experience in guardianships, conservatorships, trusts, wills, forensic probate issues and probate. He has written, published and lectured extensively on these topics. He was selected for inclusion in the 2007 through 2010 issues of Michigan Super Lawyers magazine featuring the top 5% of attorneys in Michigan and is listed in the 2011 compilation of The Best Lawyers in America. He has been called by courts as an expert witness on issues of fees and by both plaintiffs and defendants as an expert witness in the area of probate and trust law. He is listed by Martindale-Hubbell in the area of Probate Law among its Preeminent Lawyers. He is a member of the Society of American Baseball Research (SABR). For those interested in viewing previous Probate Law Case Summaries, click on the link below. http://www.kempklein.com/probate-summaries.php DT: March 25, 2011 RE: Evelyn Jean Buchinger Revocable Living Trust STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS MAJOR LEAGUE STATS: All right baseball fans spring training has started and it’s time to look to see what records will be broken this year. Let’s look at homeruns. There are three active players in the top 20 lifetime homerun list. Alex Rodriquez is ranked sixth. He has 613 homeruns. Fifth is the retired Ken Griffey with 630 and fourth is Willie Mays with 660. Alex, absent injury, will pass Ken. Willie is another story. Although Alex led the league in 2007 with 54 homeruns, the last three years he has hit 35, 30 and 30. In 2008 he was on the disabled list for 20 days, 2009 for 41 days and 2010 for 15 days. His at bats were 510, 444 and 522, respectively through those years. His games played were 138, 124 and 127. Therefore, 30 to 35 is reasonable; 47 is quite problematic. 201 West Big Beaver, Suite 600, Troy, Michigan 48084 | Phone: 248.528.1111 | Fax: 248.528.5129 | www.kempklein.com STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS Evelyn Jean Buchinger Revocable Living Trust –continued– Jim Thome just keeps on ticking and he ranks eighth with 589 behind steroid Sammy Sosa at 609. Jim is 40 years old and will be 41 in August. Jim was a designated hitter last year and played 108 games. He was not injured. I peg him at 610 – one more than Sammy; then retirement. Manny Ramirez is 14th at 555. He needs nine (9) to pass Reggie Jackson, 13 to pass Harmon Killebrew, 15 to pass Rafael Palmeiro and 23 to pass another juicer, Mark McGuire. He’s 38 years of age and played 90 games last year, plus eight (8) games in the minors. He hit nine (9) homeruns. He was picked up in free agency by Tampa. My prediction, Manny passes no one. No one will break the 500 barrier or the 400 barrier this year. In the next issue we’ll take a look at lifetime batting averages. Clue, Miguel Cabrera needs 531 bats to reach 5,000; then be considered in the ranking for lifetime averages. He has been above that since 2004. REVIEW OF CASE: Reference Files: Transferors’ Intent Reformation Parole Evidence Rule Decedent conveyed Black Acre to Trust No. 1. Attorney drew Trust No. 2. Attorney prepared Deed from Appellant to the Decedent as joint tenants, intending Brown Acre but describing Black Acre. The Deeds were recorded. Post mortem, the error was discovered. Attorney drew a second Deed, noting Scrivener error. It was signed and recorded.1 The Trust sued for reformation and the Probate Court granted same upon Scrivener’s testimony and the second Deed was reformed. The Court of Appeals affirmed the Probate Court; allowing the Scrivener’s testimony, contravening the parole evidence rule, saying that this was allowed to prove mutual mistake and reformation. The reviewer agrees but believes that the statement contradicts previous rulings by the Court of Appeals, which includes one panel member. Also, where was the mutual mistake except between transferor and Scrivener? Transferee didn’t even know there was a transfer. That fact was cited by both the Lower and Higher Courts as probative. The race notice statute was not applicable as Appellant was not a bona fide purchaser for value. If I have my facts right, there was a much simpler solution. If Settlor had deeded Black Acre to Trust No. 1, the erroneous Deed requires no reformation as Settlor lost power to re-convey Black Acre. A simple Deed from Trust No. 1 to Trust No. 2 would settle the matter as Deed No. 2 had no efficacy as being outside the chain of title. The reader is alerted to the April 1, 2010 Trust Code relative to reformation. AAM/jv/doc 683965v2 Attachment 1 The Court of Appeals does not say who signed it. Reviewer assumes the trustee of the first Trust signed it. 2 .